Next Article in Journal
Safety Analysis of Young Pedestrian Behavior at Signalized Intersections: An Eye-Tracking Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Using a Board Game to Teach about Sustainable Development
Previous Article in Journal
Parametric Study on Residential Passive House Building in Different Chinese Climate Zones
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Study on Decision-Making Opinion Exploration in Windows-Based Information Security Monitoring Tool Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Basic Courses of Design Major Based on the ADDIE Model: Shed Light on Response to Social Trends and Needs

1
Graduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan
2
School of Arts, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China
3
School of Art and Design, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(8), 4414; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084414
Submission received: 29 March 2021 / Revised: 10 April 2021 / Accepted: 13 April 2021 / Published: 15 April 2021

Abstract

:
Social innovation leads to more diverse methods for design education, which helps design education response to social trends and needs. Social change has brought about the transformation of teaching objects for design education courses, which can provide the public with more opportunities to recognise and understand design. Through the introduction of the ADDIE (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation) model in teaching design pattern through social innovation, this paper explores the system design construction of a design education course. Using the teaching practice for the course “Three-dimensional Composition” in the product design major at Tianjin University of Technology as an example and relying on a process of analysing, designing, developing, implementing and evaluating, this paper launches a design plan for design education courses. Students’ learning satisfaction is used to measure the course design, and the latest course works of applied research results in 2020 will be displayed to show students’ self-confidence and satisfaction after class. The research described in this paper attempts to construct the teaching design of design courses based on the ADDIE model. It is intended to analyse the multi-dimensional connection of design education: meeting the expectations of college students seeking to acquire design knowledge and social experience, cultivating students’ interest, and enhancing their design achievement and confidence. Moreover, this paper seeks to shed light on ways to reform design course teaching so that the design education results are more in line with the needs and expectations of the times and society.

1. Introduction

1.1. Research Background and Motivation

Time to change design education [1]. Moreover, it gets a new approach in which everyone can participate in design. Meanwhile, we need to rethink the role of design and designers, as well as cultivate new knowledge and skills that can better serve our modern world. We also need to prepare for constructing a sustainable, resilient social culture and new civilisation [2].
Design education has ushered in many changes and challenges in the context of social innovation. Designers must pay attention to organisational structure and social issues [1]. Design education is already an instrumental force among business and business schools and is a highly desired skill among employees [3]. Over time, the requirements and opportunities for design have expanded dramatically. The most valuable elements of the designer’s perspective and process, however, are seldom taught [4]. Design discipline faces current and ever-changing global challenges, which, when successful, leads to development and adaptation to the field. The change in the demands for design personnel requires design education to make the corresponding changes and transformations to suit the challenges of the time [5]. Design education must ensure that course content and delivery is relevant to the needs of industry [6]. Chinese design education has experienced three discrete stages of rapid expansion, development and discipline transformation [7]. Design education combines technological change, social transformation and international competition to meet the needs of society. It results in the cultivation of innovative national strategy and industrial development [8]. Successful design education needs the participation of colleges, teachers, students, industry organisations, enterprises and the public. As such, through the reform of design course teaching in design colleges, socialized design education is continuously promoted.
Today, “social innovation” often occurs via the popularisation of smart devices, the Internet of Things, Virtual Reality, 5G networks, and Artificial Intelligence, as well as the improvement of urban public cultural facilities, the extensive construction of urban commercial complexes and the spurt of self-media development. Social innovation provides more opportunities for design education; as such, design education has been transformed by social trends. Various social changes, such as the improvement of public awareness of design and increased demand for design in the industry, have promoted the transformation of design education. Social change has brought about the transformation of teaching objects for design education courses, so that more people have the opportunity to understand the design and, at the same time, it has expanded the voice of designers in social development. With regards to classroom teaching, however, the teaching objects are students in school; as such, traditional design education lacks opportunities to communicate with society, enterprises and industries. It is therefore difficult for teaching results to be evaluated by society.
The present research uses social innovation to make use of collaborative design and participatory design [2]. Through the five stages of the ADDIE teaching model analysis (i.e., analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation) [9], we explore the design foundation of basic design courses. The ADDIE model is applied to the foundation of basic design courses, and the course design evaluation is carried out based on students’ learning satisfaction through the implementation process of course teaching. One 2008 case study was conducted to test a course design in art design education by applying the ADDIE model and measuring learning achievement [10]. The ADDIE teaching model was applied to the design education course to understand the integration of practical ability cultivation within the design discipline and concerning industrial development in response to social demand. It was further used to analyse the course objectives and students’ needs throughout the course design process. Reasonable application of social transformation and technological change was brought about by various media, industry associations, other social organisations and the use of social network platforms. Meanwhile, it makes full use of social resources to organise professional teachers, complete course design, and develop, implement, and conduct course design evaluations to achieve the goal of cultivating compound innovative talents in design education.

1.2. Research Purpose

The present research uses as an example of the teaching practice of the course entitled the “Three-dimensional Composition” course within the product design major at the Tianjin University of Technology. We aimed to develop and implement a course design based on the ADDIE model. During the autumn semester of 2018, the ADDIE model was applied to the sophomore course of product design. We attempted to use social media, collaborative innovation teaching based on cross-professional teachers, the online MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) platform [11,12], industry association networks, public works design exhibitions and other diversified design course designs. We further attempted to develop a design education course based on the ADDIE model to achieve multiple connections with design education, meet the design knowledge acquisition and social experience goals of college students, and try to contribute to the promotion and application of design course teaching.
The purpose of this study is: (1) design a course according to the ADDIE model; (2) evaluate the effect of the course design through learning satisfaction; (3) summarise the application methods of the ADDIE model.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Social Innovation

Nearly 50 years ago, in Design for the Real World, Papenek proposed improving social balance through a new design agenda [13]. Social innovation is distinctive both in its outcomes and in its relationships, because it often leads to new forms of cooperation and collaboration [14].
Social innovation results not only in the rapid development of the social economy, but also in changes to human lifestyles that penetrate all aspects of life. In the context of social innovation of “mass entrepreneurship and innovation by all people,” the public is full of enthusiasm for product innovation and industrial innovation. At the same time, the demand for experience and participation in design is also becoming stronger [15]. Social innovation design is a form of design that combines social resources and public service. It can be applied to social organisations and the internet to help solve various social issues and promote social development [16]. Socially responsible design and need-induced design are important for training design talents in higher education. Students in the design department should be aware of the potential impact of their professional activities and make positive contributions to global communities [17]. With the process of social innovation, the public pays more attention to the creation of a social design culture [18,19]. In this way, everyone can design and redesign their existence [2].
In the context of social innovation, design education is increasingly a field that impacts the general public. From living quarters to schools, online courses to self-media sharing, design art exhibitions to commercial cultural facilities, design can reflect the cultivation of aesthetics in society and promote public participation in design. In turn, design can respond to the needs and desires of society. Design education has gradually evolved into a model built on the social network, which is, essentially, a design education for the general public. Through government guidance, media promotion and public participation, it can enhance the overall sense of design identity and design innovation. It aims to improve the degree of social innovation and development to promote industrial improvements through the cultivation of aesthetics and design skills. Design education starts with the education of the young to cultivate design interest and popularise design knowledge through educational media. It also extends the learning environment through the concept of Community-Based Education and Service, and results in educating the general public through public cultural facilities [20,21].

2.2. ADDIE Model

The ADDIE model of instructional design is a five-step process to developing iterative learning and training activities. ADDIE stands for analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation, the five stages of the teaching process. In 1978, Branson used ADDIC (analysis, design, development, implementation, control) as interservice procedures for Instructional Systems Development for different branches of the U.S. military [22,23]. The ADDIE model was later adapted and applied to teaching design, where it was equally useful and practical [24].
Analysis refers to the analysis of objectives, objects, contents, requirements, resources and tools of teaching design at the beginning of teaching design. Teaching analysis enables us to match the contents of teaching design development of the teaching activities and needs and, ultimately, achieve good results. Content design, including teaching methods, field, process and time planning of the teaching course, ensures proper interaction and organisation of the various stages of teaching implementation. Development uses modern information and training platforms to provide the content of teaching courses and process needs to promote teaching results. Implementation refers to the stage of practical application of course teaching, the necessary supporting measures for the use of course teaching, the cooperation of teaching team, hardware facilities, teaching environment to achieve the purpose of teaching. During the evaluation stage, emphasis is placed on formative evaluation to make improvements to the teaching course, summary evaluation to describe learning satisfaction and outcomes. Evaluation is helpful for the systematic improvement of teaching courses and the revision of insufficient content. It is also the standardisation and value evaluation of teaching course. Generally speaking, the ADDIE teaching model is designed to provide systematic planning indicators for teaching designers to ensure the quality of teaching design results [7,25,26]. The ADDIE model has effectively created the process of teaching activities in higher education, and, meanwhile, it has provided a clear structure of teaching design to higher education teachers [27].

2.3. Learning Satisfaction

Learning satisfaction is generally used to measure learning outcomes in the learning environment (Piccoli, Ahmad, and Ives 2001). Scholar Gordon (2001) pointed out that learning satisfaction is a systematic process that helps to improve learning outcomes and allows learners to enjoy learning experiences [28,29].
In this study, learning satisfaction was considered to be the learning experience after the design of the course was updated based on the ADDIE model. The experience of learning, as well as whether individual learning needs and learning objectives were met, was analysed through a questionnaire about learning satisfaction.
Fujca-starck and Thompson (1994) studied adult learning satisfaction and learning activities using six aspects: course quality, atmosphere, teacher–student relationship, peer relationship, support system, and physical environment. Yu-Xiang (2002) divided learning satisfaction into six categories: learning environment, school administration, teacher teaching, course content, learning outcome and interpersonal relationship. Tongmiao (2011) claimed that learning satisfaction is divided into six aspects: teacher teaching, course identification, interpersonal interaction, social care, problem-solving, and self-realisation [30,31,32]. In keeping with Yu-Xiang and Tongmiao, this study divided learning satisfaction of a design education course into the teaching field, group, methods, achievements, goals and participation, as shown in Table 1.

3. Course Design Methodology

In keeping with the ADDIE model, this study divides the basic course design into five stages: course analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation. This study takes a popular course in design education as an example, elaborating on its design process using the ADDIE model.
The course “Three-dimensional Composition” for product design majors at the Tianjin University of Technology is based on the teaching practice of the ADDIE model. As one of three basic courses of design, “Three-dimensional Composition” is scheduled for the second semester of college, and it is an important basic course for the construction of three-dimensional (3D) design thinking in product design. The course has existed in the Tianjin course catalogue for nearly ten years. Through this course, the interdisciplinary and multi-teaching model of “schools—enterprises, schools—industry associations, learning—exhibition” was established. Course teaching is based on the concepts of social innovation technology application, collaborative innovation, cross-border integration, and sustainability. The comprehensive course system was designed to meet the goals of design knowledge acquisition and social experience development for students, and tried to make some contributions to the teaching promotion and application of design courses, as shown in Table 2.

3.1. Course Analysis

3.1.1. Course Uniqueness

The “Three-dimensional Composition” course is a compulsory course for design majors at the Tianjin University of Technology, an optional course for other majors, and one of the core courses for those who specialize in product design at Tianjin. It is the main basic course for the study of 3D modelling. The course enables students to grasp the material characteristics of blocks, wires, plates and construction, as well as shapes and processing methods. It can also cultivate students’ spatial imagination, aesthetics, and creative thinking to lay a foundation for future courses in product design [33].
The course design uses the ADDIE method and focus group discussions to carry out the design process in two stages. In the first stage, the design of the course’s teaching model is explored through the ADDIE model. In the second stage, analysis and focus group discussions are conducted in the form of a teaching meeting [34].
The teaching goals of the “Three-dimensional Composition” course are to expand and improve students’ imagination of shapes through the analysis of and research about the creation law of stereo form, to explore and cultivate students’ ability to create 3D shapes, and to improve the aesthetic and aesthetic abilities of abstract forms. All of these goals centre around laying a good design foundation for students to enter the professional field of design. After many years of teaching practice, it has been found that students with lower grades need to fully understand design, not just the teaching goals of the course. This course can help students to define learning goals in the future and cultivate professional interests. After many attempts and improvements, the course teaching has been adopted through trade associations and the establishment of course websites, but it still lacks systematic course planning and design. After the introduction of the ADDIE model, the course design was planned comprehensively and systematically. The course aims to function with “art worker’s combination,” together with local industries; as such, students can better understand product creation and innovation based on market demand. School-enterprise cooperation in education results in social education and ultimately make the design course audience more extensive.
The teaching design combined with the ADDIE model divides teaching objectives of the course into five categories: material cognition, 3D modelling performance, creative ideas, creative performance, and evaluation of course outcomes, as shown in Table 3.

3.1.2. Analysis of Students’ Needs

Before the start of the course, according to the relevant literature and experience summarized in teaching practice, a survey of learning needs was conducted for the members of seven classes in the 2017 product design major. The class meeting, assignment notices, and assignment collection in the class were completed by the monitor and study members, because they understood the needs of the student group and are representative. The survey was conducted in the form of a group discussion, focusing on the “Three-dimensional Composition” course involving people, objects, environment, teaching field, teaching teachers, teaching methods, teaching results and teaching objectives.
Through a seminar, the teaching team sought to understand the needs of the student representatives in each class, as shown in Table 4.

3.1.3. Classification of Course Design

Design education driven by social innovation integrates the educational environment (school), industrial environment (industry), social environment (online), and social-cultural environment (cultural venues) of social innovation. Design education can further popularise design knowledge and improve people’s aesthetic level to promote everyone to be designers and, meanwhile, can promote social innovation. Easterday (2018) divided social design education into four categories: (1) social innovation networks; (2) project-based learning; (3) studio-based learning environments; 4) network improvement community [20].
Given the teaching objectives and student needs in the course “Three-dimensional Composition,” combined with the teaching methods and environment of design education, the courses are classified as shown in Table 5.
Classroom teaching in the school environment is a basic form of university education. Online teaching is a social inclusive education model under the development of MOOCs, and a social way of teaching and learning. Industry teaching is an extension of the teaching method based on Problem-Based Learning (PBL) [35], which was used in the project but is also commonly used in the industry so that the course and industry share a platform. Performance teaching is an extension of the course vision, with a variety of intersections with performance, display and interaction, so that students get a sense of design identity and at the same time improve their design communication.

3.2. Course Design

The course is designed around the teaching objectives and the needs of students through focus group discussions with the teaching faculty. Finally, the teaching mode of 3D design is determined.

3.2.1. Determine the Participants of the Course Design

The participants of the course design are composed of seven class teachers and three off-campus tutors. Ten teachers jointly developed and implemented the teaching course structure, as shown in Table 6.
The seven on-campus teachers graduated from different universities and have rich experience in product design, display design, service design, and many additional fields. They graduated from well-known institutions around the world, including Bauhaus Design Institute in Germany, Dongseo University of Korea, Renmin University of China, Hunan University, Jiangnan University and Tianjin Academy of Fine Arts. The teachers’ educational background, professional situation and teaching time affect their teaching quality, content and impact. The seven teachers had an average of 13 years of experience. The rich teaching experience and diverse professional backgrounds of the professors played a positive role in the design and implementation of course teaching. The three out-of-school teachers were in three different fields, two were professors from Tianjin Normal University and Tianjin University of Science and Technology, and one was the head of the Tianjin Bicycle Electric Vehicle Industry Association. They conducted professional guidance and training on the design and performance of clothing in the course, and guided the application of on-site effects and the exhibition of trade.

3.2.2. Determination of Course Teaching Structure

The focus group discussion was conducted by ten participating teachers, both on- and off-campus, and a teaching conference was held in conjunction with the teaching goals and student needs. The course structure, themes, and arrangements were jointly determined. Through the summary and review of the previous years, the industry association proposed the project requirements for the Tianjin North International Bicycle and Electric Vehicle Exhibition. That company provided a social teacher to join the course teaching conference and joined participating teachers in discussions about the course structure, as shown in Table 7.
After focus group discussions, the teaching design framework for the course was established, as shown in Figure 1.
(1)
Interdisciplinary cooperation of teaching teachers: combination of various professional fields.
Product design majors receive training with diverse educational content such as fashion design, fashion show design, exhibition design, stage art design, etc.
(2)
Transformation of teaching mode: offline education combined with online education.
The course network teaching platform is supplemented by the offline educational content and provides a learning and discussion platform. Through the platform, the following were set up: professional introduction and teaching teams, course introduction and teaching documents, course and teaching videos, teaching and practice results of recent years, course teaching material data, design competition information and award-winning works, peer evaluation, teaching material and interactive columns (e.g., homework submissions and Q&As).
(3)
Production and learning cooperation in the classroom: the combination of university course education and industry alliance education.
The combination of the university course education and the trade association, together with the introduction of the resources of industrial associations, have had a positive impact on academic talent and industry. At the same time, it has realised a docking platform for academic course and corporate or industry needs.
(4)
Social display of teaching achievements
The teaching results of the course are produced at the campus and displayed to society. The course results are used to educate the public about design knowledge, and also to allow students to impart relevant knowledge learned in the course to the public. As such, the dissemination of design knowledge for social audiences is complete.
(5)
Change of teaching field: the combination of teaching displays in the school and social public exhibition spaces
Students and teachers take the coursework out of the classroom, participation in international exhibitions, displays in commercial spaces, and other external-facing exhibitions. Course teachings are brought to a public space and thus face more audiences.

3.3. Course Development

3.3.1. Construction of Course Network Platform

The course network platform, as a necessary component of the course network, was the foundation of the MOOC teaching and one of the responses to student needs. During the course, the network platform accumulated 2000 clicks. The settings of the platform included professional introduction and teaching team, course introduction and teaching documents, course materials and teaching videos, teaching and practice achievements of recent years, design contest information and award-winning works, peer expert evaluation and interactive Bulletin Board System (BBS).
The course videos and teaching practice results were the most-clicked columns on the website. The assignments and discussions provided in the interactive BBS and Q&A provided students with an after-school communication area.

3.3.2. Industry Association-Based Learning (IBL)

Tianjin is the most important manufacturing and export base of China’s bicycle and electric vehicle industry [36]. Adhering to the principle of education for serving local industries, it actively serves the local industries. The course invites the Tianjin Bicycle and Electric Vehicle Industry Association to introduce industry needs based on the status of industry development. As such, the industry association introduces the teachers’ resources and exhibition resources into the course. Using Tianjin North International Bicycle Electric Vehicle Industry Expo as the context, the course determined the theme of “Belt and Road-Green Manufacturing.” It was agreed that the design consequences would be performed and displayed in the North International Bicycle Electric Vehicle Industry Expo.

4. Course Implementation and Evaluation

Course implementation and evaluation involved two stages, as in the ADDIE model. According to the design of an education course based on the ADDIE model, the course implementation stage is divided into two parts: the arrangement of course teachers and the arrangement of course teaching. Course evaluation includes a research sample, questionnaire composition and data analysis. Course design is evaluated by learning satisfaction, as shown in Table 8.

4.1. Course Implementation Arrangements

According to the syllabus, the course has only 72 h in six weeks. However, we rearranged the whole course time according to the previous course design. According to the course design, the course is divided into three stages. The first stage is the teaching week of course planning. This stage takes a total of 72 h for six weeks in the course plan, mainly to complete the teaching and practice of the school courses. This stage consists of four focal areas: cognition (empathy), topic analysis (definition of problems), design conception (exploration of ideas), design presentation (design prototype) [37]. The second stage occurs after class training week. This stage mainly prepares and trains for the course verification and is also the transitional stage of the course. The third stage is social performance teaching week. This stage involves the demonstration of course products. The outputs of the course will be examined via the participation of the course works in the exhibition. At the same time, it is also the stage when outputs of the design education are displayed to the public.

4.1.1. Course Teacher Arrangement

During the 12 week teaching cycle, the course teachers participate in the whole process of guidance. W1–W6 is the teaching plan time in the syllabus, W7–W12 is the teaching time after class. According to the schedule for the three stages of the course, course teachers, costume design teachers, costume performance teachers, and industry association instructors were arranged at different stages of the course, as shown in Table 9.

4.1.2. Course Teaching Arrangements

The whole course teaching arrangement is based on the ADDIE model. According to the three stages of teaching arrangement and course design framework and model, the course was arranged as shown in Table 10.

4.2. Course Evaluation

4.2.1. Research Sample

The course design of ADDIE model is evaluated by the evaluation of students’ satisfaction with the course. Our research sample was selected from November 2018 to March 2019 during a study about student satisfaction with the “Three-dimensional Composition” course for second-year product design students at Tianjin University of Technology.
Based on the characteristics of user satisfaction research, the sample was selected as a representative sample for the analysis of student satisfaction in specific courses. In this study, the product design department of the Tianjin University of Technology was selected as the research sample. A total of seven classes and 140 students, 121 questionnaires were collected, 102 of which were valid.

4.2.2. Composition of Questionnaire

The questionnaire was scored using a five-point Likert scale [38]. The content of the questionnaire refers to factors affecting learning, as described by Urdan (1997), factors affecting job satisfaction, as described by Seashore and Taber (1976) and Jennifer and Gareth (2004), and factors affecting service-learning and achievement, as described by Eyler and Giles (1999). The questionnaire scale references are shown in Table 11 [39,40,41,42].
This study combined the theory of ADDIE course design model and the above analysis of learning satisfaction. The course learning satisfaction scale was divided into six topics: teaching field (teaching location, virtual and real space), teaching teachers (teacher background, teacher source), teaching methods (teaching means, course design arrangement), teaching achievements (form of work display), teaching objectives (course teaching objectives) and teaching participation (understanding of design, learning achievement and self-confidence). It had a total of 18 questions, each of which sought to measure and evaluate the degree of college students’ satisfaction after participating in the ADDIE model teaching course, “Three-dimensional Composition.”
Before the formal distribution of the questionnaire, seven class monitors and study committee members were pre-tested and provided feedback about where the questionnaire was unclear and where students might be confused. As a result of these discussions, the description of the course achievement promotion meeting and the cross-disciplinary teachers were explained in the questionnaire, as shown in Table 12.

4.2.3. Data Analysis

In this study, 121 questionnaires were collected for data processing, 19 invalid questionnaires were deleted, and 102 valid questionnaires were finally analysed using SPSS statistical software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
(1)
Reliability Analysis (Cronbach’s alpha)
Through analysis of the literature and expert discussion, a scale to measure students’ learning satisfaction was obtained. The scale measures students’ learning satisfaction with the course. After a Cronbach’s alpha analysis, the internal consistency was high, indicating that the measurement of course satisfaction with this scale is reliable.
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett methods were used to verify the validity of the questionnaire. The KMO value of the questionnaire was 0.940, and the significance of the Bartlett spherical test was 0.000. Cronbach’s alpha [43] was used to measure the reliability of the questionnaire. If the components that made up this construct are highly correlated, the alpha value is high. Cronbach ≥ 0.70 is considered to demonstrate high internal consistency [44]. The overall alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.986. Therefore, these projects had acceptable reliability and validity for the topic of interest, and the samples were of sufficient size [45].
(2)
Analysis of Questionnaire Data
After the analysis of the learning satisfaction questionnaire, the average score was 4.235, and students’ overall satisfaction with course learning was high. The mean and standard deviation of constructs of students’ learning through the course and the average score of each dimension were as follows: “Teaching Field” (M = 4.15), “Teaching Faculty” (M = 4.20), “Teaching Methods” (M = 4.25), “Teaching Results” (M = 4.29), “Teaching Objectives” (M = 4.27) and “Teaching Participation” (M = 4.26). See Table 13 and Table 14.
Item A1, online teaching and course integration teaching of online colleges (online and offline teaching), had a mean of 4.11, sd = 1.024. Item A2, performance and exhibition teaching of industry exhibitions (social teaching), had a mean of 4.2, sd = 1.093. Item A3, performance teaching (social teaching) of the course promotion meeting (hotel opening ceremony), had a mean of 4.12, sd = 1.093. The item with the highest learning satisfaction was item A2, which was in cooperation with course design and industry associations, teaching achievements and participation in industry exhibitions and opening receptions, extending teaching space to public convention and exhibition centres, commercial hotels, and linking online teaching to achieve O2O teaching integration.
In the teaching teacher’s construct, item B1, the teaching for teachers with multi-professional background, was 4.23, sd = 1.033. For item B2, interdisciplinary teaching (fashion design, fashion performance) was 4.25, sd = 1.085. For item B3, teaching to teachers of industry associations, the mean was 4.11, sd = 1.052. Among them, item B2, which had the highest mean, reflects that students had the highest satisfaction with the interdisciplinary cooperation of the teacher team.
In the construct of teaching methods, item C1, design creative guidance for teachers in the classroom, had a mean of 4.21, sd = 1.066. For C2, teaching methods for teachers, the mean was 4.21, sd = 0.998. For C3, course design for teachers, the mean was 4.29, sd = 0.960. Among them, item C3 had the highest mean, indicating the highest satisfaction with the entire course design arrangement. It confirms the benefit of designing courses from the analysis needs theory in the ADDIE model.
In the construct of teaching achievement, item D1, for the performance form of the work, the mean was 4.30, sd = 0.973. For D2, the exhibition form of the work, the mean was 4.32, sd = 0.956. For D3, the form of interactive teaching of the work and the audience, the mean was 4.25, sd = 1.057. Among them, the item with the highest average score, D2, was also the highest score among the 18 questions. This result demonstrates students’ needs for teaching achievements to be recognised by more audiences off-campus, which is a developing trend in education for design teaching and social education.
Under the construct of teaching goals, item E1, learning about the selection and application of materials, had a mean of 4.27, sd = 0.935. Likewise, E2, understanding and shaping of three-dimensional form, had a mean of 4.30, sd = 0.942. E3, the integration of creative performance and industry topics, had a mean of 4.25, sd = 1.031. The item with the highest mean was E2, the understanding and shaping of three-dimensional forms, which is also the core content of the course teaching goals. The students’ high satisfaction demonstrates the achievement of the teaching goals of the course.
In the construct of teaching participation, item F1, perception of design, had a mean of 4.26, sd = 0.943. F2, sense of achievement in design, had a mean of 4.28, sd = 0.969. F3, increased confidence in design, had a mean equal to 4.25, sd = 1.096. The item with the highest average score, F2, shows that students had a high degree of satisfaction with design achievement after participating in the course, which is also one of the teaching purposes of junior design courses. It is of great significance for the future course teaching and career planning to cultivate students’ interest in learning, enhance their design achievements and cultivate their self-confidence.

5. Discussion and Conclusions

5.1. Discussion

Through the application of the ADDIE model to course design and implementation, our research passed through five complete stages of the design process: analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation [9,10]. Through this research process, we found that design courses carried out through the ADDIE model can be better based on the needs of students combined with social innovation resources. They can integrate cross-disciplinary teacher teams, industry project placement courses, social performance platforms, etc. to increase learning satisfaction. Continuous teaching discussions with the teaching team, in-depth cooperation of the industry association, and the student interest and confidence in the design profession have affirmed the course design. Besides the affirmation, the research on the ADDIE course design method used for the design course can be applied to other design teaching applications [1,2].
Through the application of the ADDIE course design to complete the teaching practice in the course, “Three-dimensional Composition,” this paper compares the teaching method, teaching environment, evaluation, object and effect with the traditional teaching mode without course reform, as shown in Table 15. Through the application of the ADDIE model utilising social innovation, course teaching has changed significantly in many aspects [4,5,6,7,8]. With the change of information technology and students’ learning needs, as well as the change of the design industry and social needs, design education must be changed in the course design [1].
Through introduction of the concept of social innovation, this paper keeps the five stages: analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation in the course of curriculum design [13,14,15,16,17]. These concepts are used in relation to the teaching field, teaching teachers, teaching methods, teaching achievements, teaching objectives and teaching participation. It also attempts to promote the application of other design courses and optimise the impact of the course [20,21].

5.2. Course Work

In the teaching of the Three-dimensional Composition course in 2020, we used the complete framework of this research. We involved students in the design of a course, one of which incorporates a three-dimensional presentation of the theme of fighting COVID-19. Another assignment is the paper clothing design with the theme of “One Belt and One Road”. Through the presentation of the new course, we saw the excellent work of the students, as well as their confidence and satisfaction when they stood on the stage, as shown in Table 16. I believe that is the meaning of our course design [4].

5.3. Conclusions

(1)
Course adjustment
Course reform is a step-by-step teaching process, through the introduction of the ADDIE model of course design. We found that appropriate adjustments to the course schedule can maximise the impact of the course. The adjustment of the course time cycle requires the input of the school teaching management department. To adapt to the development of design teaching, future design courses should have a more flexible method of course planning [4,5,6,7,8]. This is exactly the limitation of course design, such as the overall arrangement of teaching plan time and extracurricular teaching time in this study. Course design lengthens the teaching time and increases more extracurricular teaching. It brings time problems to teachers and students in the second and third stages of course design.
(2)
Teaching teambuilding
The formation of a teacher team will also be the limitation of course design, which will directly affect the success or failure of course design. Teaching faculty is the core of the teaching process. A teaching team with a reasonable professional background and stable team members is one of the driving forces for the continuous development and improvement of the course. In addition, increasing the value of the teaching team through the regular addition of new, social teachers can aid in achieving the goals of design education and social development.
(3)
Construction of the social cooperation platform
A social cooperation platform is not only a bridge between school teaching and social needs, but also a difficult link in course design [15,16]. We found that, without industry association and cross-disciplinary teachers, the impact of the course will be reduced. The in-depth exploration of the social cooperation platform enables design courses to connect with society and have more opportunities to interact with social issues and achieve opportunities for public display. The teaching process is more open so that the public can better understand the design and set up a better social view for design education [46,47].

Author Contributions

All the authors contributed to the paper. X.Z. collected data and wrote the manuscript; J.-C.T. supervised the writing; X.-Y.Z. gave suggestions; X.Z. acted as the corresponding author. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “Tianjin Art Science Planning Project”, grant number: C18026.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Norman, D. Why (Art and) Design Education Must Change. Core77. 26 November. Available online: http://www.core77.com/blog/columns/whydesigneducationmustchange (accessed on 1 October 2019).
  2. Manzini, E. Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for social Innovation, 1st ed.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; ISBN 9780262028608. [Google Scholar]
  3. Berk, S. Designing for the Future of Education Requires Design Education. Art Educ. 2016, 69, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Meyer, M.; Norman, D. Changing Design Education for the 21st Century. She Ji J. Des. Econ. Innov. 2020, 6, 13–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, X. Interdisciplinary View on Design Education. In Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management, London, UK, 19–21 June 2019; Volume 1, pp. 59–72. [Google Scholar]
  6. Griffiths, R. Design education: Ensuring course content and delivery is relevant to the needs of industry. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Salzburg, Austria, 7–8 September 2006; pp. 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, L.H. Teaching is Reflective Training to Find Design Solutions. Design 2019, 4, 73–75. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, D.D.; Xie, H.L. Chinese Industrial Design Education in the View of Internationalization and Digitization: Interview with Professor He Renke. Zhuangshi 2019, 5, 40–44. [Google Scholar]
  9. Molenda, M. In Search of the Elusive ADDIE Model. Perform. Improv. 2003, 5, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, S.H.; Tseng, H.C. Investigation of technology integrated instruction in art education: A case study of exploring learning achievement. J. Educ. Multimed. Hypermedia 2008, 17, 337–361. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mcauley, A.; Stewart, B.; Cormier, D.; Siemens, G. The MOOC Model for Digital Practice. 2010. Available online: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/43171365/MOOC_Final.pdf?1456693335=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DThe_MOOC_model_for_digital_practice.pdf&Expires=1618299466&Signature=DZe8sFhseCqVOJ~daYk2biJoDsywwhLZ4EzN0OZZhOV7J29S7rEPhfKLn82XQB8NPBgJldXm4tfrDMojtdJDyLW6EO93NJ68wgzN8I2LW6tcN56WaNT7U6yP7TGR06SEQWiLw8b6~NvoaMni0PhwPtHbr8mZbeIi~qKM1RCMeeYPTpzkesl3RITT0EqHhizS~JM4MnehPrgEODXKIBIjeVe9W0Aw~zgBd8OPwXoZwk~EhIDR9TfDjc3ZRZz30Yf7bQYxpZ5lJWdZoZK06rzTzKFXny~5y~MskI29pHpfEaqLUSXlMYH02OzJH7KHK4~IHIHlqlEQ-Gqrn4UcAHZ7FA__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA (accessed on 1 October 2019).
  12. Wikipedia. Model Online Course. Available online: https://zh.wikipedia.org (accessed on 2 October 2019).
  13. Papanek, V. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, 1st ed.; Pantheon Books: New York, NY, USA, 1971; ISBN 0-394-47036-2. [Google Scholar]
  14. Murray, R.; Caulier-Grice, J.; Mulgan, G. The Open Book of Social Innovation: Ways to Design, Develop and Grow Social Innovation, 1st ed.; The Young Foundation: London, UK, 2010; ISBN 9781848750715. [Google Scholar]
  15. Manzini, E. Making things happen: Social innovation and design. Des. Issues 2014, 30, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhong, F.; Liu, X. Design for and by the people: Paths, challenges and opportunities for social innovation. Zhuangshi 2018, 5, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
  17. Vere, I.; Charny, D. Social Innovation in the Curriculum: A Model for Community Engagement and Design Intervention. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Design Education, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 21–25 August 2017; Volume 9. [Google Scholar]
  18. Julier, G. The Culture of Design, 3rd ed.; Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2014; ISBN 9781412930451. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bennett, A.G.; Cassim, F.; Merwe, M. How design education can use generative play to innovate for social change: A case study on the design of South African children’s health education toolkits. Int. J. Des. 2017, 11, 57–72. [Google Scholar]
  20. Easterday, M.W.; Gerber, E.M.; Lewis, D.G.R. Social innovation networks: A new approach to social design education and impact. Des. Issues 2018, 34, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Goldberger, P.; Li, Y.-C. Design, Education and Social. Times Archit. 2005, 6, 122–125. [Google Scholar]
  22. Branson, R.K. The interservice procedures for instructional systems development. Educ. Technol. 1978, 3, 11–14. [Google Scholar]
  23. Nadiyah, R.S.; Faaizah, S. The Development of Online Project Based Collaborative Learning Using ADDIE Model. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 195, 1803–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Tzu-Chuan, H.; Jane, L.H.; Turton, M.A.; Su-Fen, C. Using the ADDIE model to develop online continuing education courses on caring for nurses in taiwan. J. Contin. Educ. Nurs. 2014, 45, 124–131. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lin, Y.-J. ADDIE Instructional Model. University of Library Science and Information. October 2012. Available online: http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678782 (accessed on 1 December 2019).
  26. ADDIE-Instructional Designer’s Handbook. Instructional Designers of Penn State. Available online: https://psu.pb.unizin.org/idhandbook/chapter/addie (accessed on 1 December 2019).
  27. Fang, M.J.; Zheng, X.X.; Hu, W.Q.; Shen, Y. On the ADDIE-based effective instructional design for higher education classrooms. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 271–273, 1542–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Piccoli, G.; Ahmad, R.; Ives, B. Web-Based Virtual Learning Environment: A Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic IT Skill Training. MIS Q. 2001, 25, 401–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Gordon, D.G. Classroom management: Problems and solutions. Music Educ. J. 2001, 88, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Fujita-Starck, P.J.; Thompson, J.A. The Effects of Motivation and Classroom Environment on the Satisfaction of Noncredit Continuing Education Students. AIR 1994 Annual Forum Paper. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed.373646). Ph.D. Thesis, University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  31. Huang, Y.X. Study on Motivation and Motivation of Students at Community University. Bachelor’s Thesis, Institute of Adult and Continuing Education, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan, 2002. Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  32. Guan, T.M. The Impact on Satisfaction of College Students towards Participating Service-Learning Course. J. Gen. Educ. Tainan Univ. Technol. 2011, 1, 87–110. [Google Scholar]
  33. Undergraduate Teaching and Training Program. School of Art, Tianjin University of Technology. Intern. Mater. 2017. Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  34. Guan, Y.S. Design Research Methods, 3rd ed.; Quanhua Books Co., Ltd.: New Taipei City, Taiwan, 2015; ISBN 9789572179062. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wood, D.F. Problem-based learning. JPMA J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2004, 51, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Tianjin Became the Largest Electric Bicycle Production Base in China. China Quality News, 3 January 2014. Available online: http://www.cqn.com.cn (accessed on 1 October 2019).
  37. Brown, T.; Wyatt, J. Design thinking for social innovation. Standford Soc. Innov. Rev. 2010, 8, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wikipedia. Likert Scale. Available online: https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki (accessed on 1 October 2019).
  39. Urdan, T.C. Examining the relations among early adolescent students’ goals and friends’ orientation toward effort and achievement in school. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 1997, 22, 165–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Seashore, S.E.; Taber, T.D. Job Satisfaction and Their Correlation. Am. Behav. Sci. 1976, 18, 346–368. [Google Scholar]
  41. Jennifer, M.; Gareth, R. Organizational Behavior, Structure, Processes; Mc Graw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2004; ISBN 9780136124436. [Google Scholar]
  42. Eyler, J.; Giles, D. Where’s the Learning in Service-Learning? Jossey-Bass Publishing Company: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1999; ISBN 9780787944834. [Google Scholar]
  43. Cronbach, L.J.; Meehl, P.E. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 1955, 52, 52–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, S.L.; Chen, H.P.; Hu, S.L.; Lee, C.D. Analyzing Student Satisfaction in the Technical and Vocational Education System through Collaborative Teaching. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Tu, J.-C.; Liu, L.-X.; Wu, K.-Y. Study on the Learning Effectiveness of Stanford Design Thinking in Integrated Design Education. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Li, W.-T.; Ho, M.-C.; Yang, C. A Design Thinking-Based Study of the Prospect of the Sustainable Development of Traditional Handicrafts. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Instructional Design Structure of the Course “Three-dimensional Composition”.
Figure 1. Instructional Design Structure of the Course “Three-dimensional Composition”.
Sustainability 13 04414 g001
Table 1. Analysis of learning satisfaction literature.
Table 1. Analysis of learning satisfaction literature.
SourceDiscourse on Learning SatisfactionResearch Object
Piccoli, Ahmad & Ives (2001)Variables used to measure learning effectiveness in the learning environmentStudent
Gordon (2001)A systematic process that helps to improve learning outcomes and enables learners to experience learningStudent
Fujita-Starck & Thompson (1994)Course quality, atmosphere, teacher–student relationship, peer relationship, support system, physical environment equipmentAdult Student
Huang Yu-Xiang (2002)Learning environment, school administration, teacher teaching, course content, learning outcomes and interpersonal relationshipsCommunity Student
Chang Tongmiao (2011)Teacher teaching, course identification, interpersonal interaction, social care, problem-solving, self-realisationCollege Students
Present study (2020)Teaching field, teaching group, teaching methods, teaching achievements, teaching goals, teaching participationCollege Students
Table 2. Course design methodology.
Table 2. Course design methodology.
Research MethodADDIE Model Stage StepsCourse Design Content
Course AnalysisThe uniqueness of the course
Student needs analysis
Course design classification
Course DesignThe identity of course design participants
Determination of course teaching structure
Course DevelopmentConstruction of the course network platform
Introduction of business issues
Table 3. Course objectives.
Table 3. Course objectives.
Phase StepsCourse TargetsDetails
1Material recognitionKnowledge and exploration of paper
23D modelling performanceConstruction and implementation of three-dimensional structure
3Creative ideasIdeas for paper theme design
4Creative performancePerformance of paper-fitting theme design
5Evaluation of course outcomesExhibition of course achievements
Table 4. Analysis of students’ needs.
Table 4. Analysis of students’ needs.
Serial NumberDiscussion TopicsStudents’ Needs
1Teaching FieldExpectations for the course’s online delivery platform
Looking forward to the opportunity to teach in out-of-school enterprises
Expect courses to be extended off-campus
Expect more fields for design research
Expect design materials to be taught outside the school
2Teaching StaffExpect teachers from different professional backgrounds
Expect professionals from the enterprise to teach together
Expect the involvement of cross-disciplinary teachers
Expect teachers with an overseas background
3Teaching MethodExpect more creative thinking guidance
Expect a livelier classroom atmosphere
Expect to have the opportunity to learn and extend after class
4Teaching AchievementsExpect less homework
Expect the course results to be seen by more people
Expect more people to learn about our courses
Expect not to spend too much
5Teaching ObjectivesExpectation of design materials
Expect an understanding of three-dimensional form
Expect to be helpful for product design
Expectations that can help the development of design thinking
Table 5. Course Design Classification.
Table 5. Course Design Classification.
Course Design Classification
CategoryForm
Classroom teachingSchool education environment
Online teachingNetwork communication environment
Industry teachingIndustry environment
Show TeachingPublic venue environment
Table 6. Basic information for teachers.
Table 6. Basic information for teachers.
CodingNameProfessionTeaching Tasks
School TeacherZ_LZ-ProfessorProduct designCourse planning and teaching
Design education
L_YL-associate professorProduct designCourse leader and teaching
Design Culture Studies
W_LW- associate professorExhibition space designCourses
Design education
L_ZL-associate professorHuman factors engineeringCourses
Smart product design
Z_QZ-lecturerCeramic art designCourses
Public art design
W_HW-lecturerService designCourses
User experience design
Z_XZ-associate professorProduct designCourses
Author of this article
Service design
Off-campus TeacherZ_HProfessor ZCostume showCostume Tutor
Image design
Q_SProfessor QFashion designCostume Design Instructor
X_BX EngineerMechanical designIndustry Mentor
Table 7. Transcript for teaching meetings.
Table 7. Transcript for teaching meetings.
ProjectTeacherTeaching Meeting Minutes
1Z_LDemand introduction of Industry Association and combination of production, learning and research
2L_YSocial education, design communication
3W_LExhibition effect and presentation
4L_ZTheme determination, smart manufacturing, green, sustainable
5Z_QPractical Teaching, Art and Technology, Art and Craft
6W_HCombination of online teaching, online education and offline education
7Z_XCross-domain integration, integration of different professional knowledge
8Z_HThe introduction of costume expertise
9Q_SThe introduction of fashion design expertise
10X_BRequests for Tianjin North International Bicycle Electric Vehicle Exhibition
Table 8. Course implementation and evaluation.
Table 8. Course implementation and evaluation.
Course Implementation and EvaluationADDIE Model Stage StepsCourse Design Content
Course implementation arrangementsCourse teacher arrangement
Course teaching arrangement
Course evaluationResearch sample
Questionnaire composition
Data analysis
Table 9. Course teacher arrangements.
Table 9. Course teacher arrangements.
Lesson Plan Teaching WeekAfter-School Training and Teaching WeekSocial Show Teaching Week
Teaching WeekW1W2W3W4W5W6W7W8W9W10W11W12
Course teacher Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001
Costume teacher Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001
Performance teacher Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001
Industry Association Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001 Sustainability 13 04414 i001
Table 10. Teaching arrangements.
Table 10. Teaching arrangements.
Teaching MethodsWeek NumberWeekCourse Progress
Classroom teaching1st weekMondayTeaching of course theoretical knowledge, teaching and learning case introduction, textbook interpretation;
Multimedia teaching, teaching schedule;Interpretation of outstanding work cases over the years.
Live teaching WednesdayGoing to Tianjin Paper market to understand the types of paper materials and collect the composition of paper art materials
Assignment: Collect ten different paper materials, sample 10 * 10 cm, and mount them on black cardboard.
Classroom teaching2nd weekMondayCourse objective: 3D training and scenario design
1. Assignment 1: Paper survey, collection, display and exchange report
2. Assignment 2: 2D to 3D
Subject: A piece of paper story
“Thanksgiving” as the theme, to think about gratitude. A piece of A4 paper is used to make a three-dimensional greeting card, which is presented in the form of two-dimensional to three-dimensional transformation. There is no limit to the paper material and performance.
After reviewing the homework, students are encouraged to give their work to “grateful” people.
Wednesday1. Assignment 3: Who am I
Make a hat out of paper and express your own identity.
May wear it on the head and walk around the classroom to complete the statement of “Who Am I”?
Online teaching3rd weekMondayCourse website learning
Complete the website hours and upload the learning experience report in the discussion area
Classroom teaching WednesdayAssignment 3: Who am I?
Class catwalks and reports
Classroom teaching4th weekMondayCourse Objectives: Three-dimensional thinking and the use of materials.
Assignment 4: Experimental group project
Topic: “One Belt, One Road-Green Manufacturing” Creative Paper Show
With the theme of “One Belt, One Road-Green Manufacturing”, select national characteristics or green manufacturing industry elements along the Belt and Road to complete 1: 1 paper clothing design and production.
A group of three members each completed one piece, and the group members acted as models to complete the catwalk performance
Creative ideas and sketches
WednesdayDetermine the design plan and prepare materials and tools
Design Workshop5th WeekMondayCourse Purpose: Design Practice and Expression
Design and guidance
WednesdayCourse Purpose: Design Practice and Expression
Design and guidance
6th WeekMondayCourse Purpose: Design Practice and Expression
Design and guidance
On-campusOpen teaching WednesdayReports and exhibitions
After-school Training and Teaching Week7th–9th week Stage performance training, booth design and construction
Social Show Teaching Week10th–12th Week 1. Tianjin North International Bicycle Electric Vehicle Industry Expo
 (1) Opening Ceremony: Creative Paper Show
 (2) Exhibition scene: works exhibition and catwalk
2. Exhibition of works in commercial space
Teaching Conference Comprehensive evaluation and consideration of course performance
Table 11. Questionnaire scale reference.
Table 11. Questionnaire scale reference.
SourceQuestionnaireResearch Object
Urdan (1997)Study motivation, work motivation, service motivationFactors affecting learning
Seashore and Taber (1976)
Jennifer and Gareth (2004)
Personal factors: including demographic variables, personality traits, situational personality (such as motivation, preference, value), temporary personality (such as anger), perceptual cognition and expectation, abilityJob satisfaction
Environmental factors: working conditions, organisational environment, occupational nature, social environment, political and economic environment, etc.
Eyler and Giles (1999)Learning cognition, learning achievementService-learning cognition and achievement
Chang Tongmiao (2011)Teachers’ teaching, course identification, interpersonal interaction, social care, problem-solving and self-realisationService-learning satisfaction
Present study (2020)Teaching field, teaching faculty, teaching methods, teaching achievements, teaching goals, teaching participationCourse learning satisfaction
Table 12. Questionnaire scale.
Table 12. Questionnaire scale.
Course DesignLearning Satisfaction Scale
Teaching Field01. Integration of online network teaching and offline course teaching
02. Performance and display teaching of Industry Exhibition
03. Performance teaching for the course achievement introduction meeting (hotel opening ceremony)
Teaching Staff04. Teaching teachers in multi-disciplinary subjects
05. Lectures to interdisciplinary teachers (costume design, fashion show)
06.Teaching to teachers of industry associations
Teaching Method07. Design creative guidance for teachers
08. Teaching methods for teachers
09. Course design arrangements for teachers
Teaching Achievements10. Performance form of works
11. Forms for exhibition of works
12. Forms of interactive lectures on works and audiences
Teaching Objectives13. Learning of material selection and application
14. Understanding and shaping of three-dimensional form
15. Fusion of creative performance and industry topics
Teaching Participation16. Perception of design
17. Sense of achievement in design
18. Increased confidence in design
Table 13. Mean and standard deviation of constructs.
Table 13. Mean and standard deviation of constructs.
ConstructParticipantsMeanStandard Deviation
ATeaching Field1024.151.070
BTeaching Staff1024.201.056
CTeaching Method1024.251.008
DTeaching Achievements1024.290.995
ETeaching Objectives1024.270.969
FTeaching Participation1024.261.003
Table 14. Means and standard deviations of the items.
Table 14. Means and standard deviations of the items.
Term Statistics
MeanStandard DeviationParticipants
A1. Integration of online network teaching and offline course teaching4.111.024102
A2. Performance and display teaching of Industry Exhibition4.211.093102
A3. Performance teaching for the course achievement introduction meeting (hotel opening ceremony)4.121.093102
B1. Teaching teachers in multi-disciplinary subjects4.231.033102
B2. Interdisciplinary teaching (fashion design, fashion performance)4.251.085102
B3. Teaching to teachers of industry associations4.111.052102
C1. Creative design guidance for teachers4.211.066102
C2. Teaching methods for teachers4.210.998102
C3. Course design for teachers4.290.960102
D1. Form of performance of works4.300.973102
D2. Work exhibition form4.320.956102
D3. The form of interactive teaching of works and audience4.251.057102
E1. Learning of material selection and application4.270.935102
E2. Understanding and shaping of three-dimensional form4.300.942102
E3. Fusion of creative performance and industry issues4.251.031102
F1. Perception of design4.260.943102
F2. Sense of achievement in design4.280.969102
F3. Increased confidence in design4.251.096102
Table 15. Comparison of traditional courses and ADDIE design courses.
Table 15. Comparison of traditional courses and ADDIE design courses.
Comparison of the Teaching of Three-Dimensional Composition Course with and without the ADDIE Approach
Traditional TeachingADDIE Approach to Social Innovation
Teaching methodsTeach in-personO2O combined online and offline
Course website re-learning, assignment submission and discussion
Listening-style teachingParticipatory teaching
Students, teachers, industry, industry, and the public participate in the course process, multiple interactions
Lecture provided by product design teacherDiversified teaching
Multi-domain integration of design, performance, director, industry and other teachers
Teaching environmentIn-school teachingSocial teaching
On-campus exhibitions,
off-campus teaching, performances, exhibitions
Teaching evaluationTeacher evaluationOverview
Teacher evaluation, public evaluation, industry evaluation, exhibition evaluation, media evaluation, etc.
Teaching objectCourse classSocial multiple groups
Staff of different specialities, industries and the public, etc.
Teaching effectCourse cognitionSocial communication
Table 16. Course work.
Table 16. Course work.
StudentProject 1Project 2
A Sustainability 13 04414 i002 Sustainability 13 04414 i003
B Sustainability 13 04414 i004 Sustainability 13 04414 i005
C Sustainability 13 04414 i006 Sustainability 13 04414 i007
D Sustainability 13 04414 i008 Sustainability 13 04414 i009
E Sustainability 13 04414 i010 Sustainability 13 04414 i011
F Sustainability 13 04414 i012 Sustainability 13 04414 i013
G Sustainability 13 04414 i014 Sustainability 13 04414 i015
H Sustainability 13 04414 i016 Sustainability 13 04414 i017
I Sustainability 13 04414 i018 Sustainability 13 04414 i019
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tu, J.-C.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.-Y. Basic Courses of Design Major Based on the ADDIE Model: Shed Light on Response to Social Trends and Needs. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084414

AMA Style

Tu J-C, Zhang X, Zhang X-Y. Basic Courses of Design Major Based on the ADDIE Model: Shed Light on Response to Social Trends and Needs. Sustainability. 2021; 13(8):4414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084414

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tu, Jui-Che, Xu Zhang, and Xiu-Yue Zhang. 2021. "Basic Courses of Design Major Based on the ADDIE Model: Shed Light on Response to Social Trends and Needs" Sustainability 13, no. 8: 4414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084414

APA Style

Tu, J. -C., Zhang, X., & Zhang, X. -Y. (2021). Basic Courses of Design Major Based on the ADDIE Model: Shed Light on Response to Social Trends and Needs. Sustainability, 13(8), 4414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084414

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop