Employable through Social Media: An Intervention Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theory and Hypotheses’ Development
2.1. Employability
2.2. Social Media Use for Professional Development
2.3. The Effectiveness of Training in Social Media Use for Professional Development
2.4. The Relationship between Social Media Use for Professional Development and Employability
2.5. The Moderating Role of Motivation in the Relationship between Acutal Social Media Use for Professional Development and Employability
3. Methodology
3.1. Procedure and Sample
3.2. The Learning Intervention
3.3. Measures
3.4. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive Statistics
4.2. The Difference in Social Media Use for Professional Development before and after the Learning Intervention (LinkedIn)
4.3. The Direct Relationships between Social Media Use for Professional Development Exploitation Levels and the Employability Dimensions
4.4. The Moderating Role of Motivation in the Relationship between Exploitation Levels of Social Media Use for Professional Development and the Employability Dimensions
5. Discussion and Conclusions
5.1. The Difference in Social Media Use for Professional Development before and after the LinkedIn Intervention
5.2. The Direct Relationships between Social Media Use for Professional Development Exploitation Levels and the Employability Dimensions
5.3. The Moderating Role of Motivation in the Relationship between Exploitation Levels of Social Media Use for Professional Development and the Employability Dimensions
6. Practical Implications
7. Limitations and Recommendations for Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Martínez-Cerdá, J.F.; Torrent-Sellens, J.; González-González, I.; Ficapal-Cusí, P. Opening the black-box in lifelong e-learning for employability: A framework for a socio-technical e-learning employability system of measurement (STELEM). Sustainability 2018, 10, 1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sun, Y.; Ding, Z.; Zhang, Z.J.; Gauthier, J. The sustainable positive effects of enterprise social media on employees: The visibility and vicarious learning lens. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nisar, T.M.; Prabhakar, G.; Strakova, L. Social media information benefits, knowledge management and smart organizations. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 94, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clayton, K.E.; Blumberg, F.C.; Anthony, J.A. Linkages between course status, perceived course value, and students’ preference for traditional versus non-traditional learning environments. Comput. Educ. 2018, 125, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- LinkedIn. Available online: https://about.linkedin.com/nl-nl?lr=1 (accessed on 10 March 2021).
- Bridgstock, R. Educational practices for employability and career development learning through social media: Exploring the potential of LinkedIn. In Practice Futures for the Common Good; Higgs, J., Horsfall, D., Cork, S., Jones, A., Eds.; Sense-Brill Publishers: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 143–152. [Google Scholar]
- Moghavvemi, S.; Sulaiman, A.; Jaafar, N.I.; Kasem, N. Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: The case of Youtube. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 2018, 16, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nussbaum-Beach, S.; Hall, L.R. The Connected Educator: Learning and Leading in a Digital Age; Solution Tree Press: Bloomington, IN, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Grosseck, G. To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education? Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2009, 1, 478–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamel, S.H. Egypt’s ongoing uprising and the role of social media: Is there development? Inf. Technol. Dev. 2014, 20, 78–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobaih, A.E.E.; Moustafa, M.A.; Ghandforoush, P.; Khan, M. To use or not to use? Social media in higher education in developing countries. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 58, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osgerby, J.; Rush, D. An exploratory case study examining undergraduate accounting students’ perceptions of using Twitter as a learning support tool. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 2015, 13, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratten, V. Coronavirus (Covid-19) and the entrepreneurship education community. J. Enterprising Communities People Places Glob. Econ. 2020, 14, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coleman, J. Foundations of Social Theory; Harvard University Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Manzoor, F.; Wei, L.; Bányai, T.; Nurunnabi, M.; Subhan, Q.A. An examination of sustainable HRM practices on job performance: An application of training as a moderator. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nahapiet, J.; Ghoshal, S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1998, 23, 242–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Klink, M.V.; van der Heijden, B.I.J.M.; Boon, J.; Rooij, S.W. Exploring the contribution of formal and informal learning to academic staff member employability: A Dutch perspective. Career Dev. Int. 2014, 19, 337–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, F.; Partridge, H.; Bruce, C.; Hemmings, B. Designing informal learning experiences for early career academics using a knowledge ecosystem model. J. Furth. High. Educ. 2017, 41, 692–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Gao, Y.; Yan, X.; de Pablos, P.O.; Sun, Y.; Cao, X. From e-learning to social-learning: Mapping development of studies on social media-supported knowledge management. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 51, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, N.; Quadri, N.N.; Qureshi, M.R.; Alam, M.M. Relationship modeling of critical success factors for enhancing sustainability and performance in e-learning. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Spitzberg, B.H. Preliminary development of a model and measure of computer-mediated communication (CMC) competence. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 2006, 11, 629–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hobfoll, S.E. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am. Psychol. 1989, 44, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Zhang, W.; Zeng, R. WeChat use intensity and social support: The moderating effect of motivators for WeChat use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 91, 244–251. [Google Scholar]
- Mayrhofer, W.; Briscoe, J.P.; Hall, D.T.T.; Dickmann, M.; Dries, N.; Dysvik, A.; Kaše, R.; Parry, E.; Unite, J. Career success across the globe: Insights from the 5C project. Organ. Dyn. 2016, 45, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tang, K.Y.; Hsiao, C.H.; Su, Y.S. Networking for educational innovations: A bibliometric survey of international publication patterns. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peters, P.; Lam, W. Can employability do the trick? Revealing paradoxical tensions and responses in the process of adopting innovative employability enhancing policies and practices in organizations. Ger. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2015, 29, 235–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Heijde, C.M.; van der Heijden, B.I.J.M. A competence-based and multi-dimensional operationalization and measurement of employability. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2006, 45, 449–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van der Heijden, B.I.J.M.; Notelaers, G.; Peters, P.; Stoffers, J.M.; de Lange, A.H.; Froehlich, D.E.; van der Heijde, C.M. Development and validation of the short-form employability five-factor instrument. J. Vocat. Behav. 2018, 106, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Katz, D.; Kahn, R.L. The Social Psychology of Organizations, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Nonaka, I.; Takeuchi, H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Anand, A.; Singh, M.D. Understanding knowledge management. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2011, 3, 926–939. [Google Scholar]
- Wiig, K.M. Knowledge Management Foundations: Thinking About Thinking—How People and Organizations Create, Represent and Use Knowledge, 2nd ed.; Schema Press: Arlington, TX, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Polanyi, M. Tacit knowing: Its bearing on some problems of philosophy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1962, 34, 601–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nonaka, I.; von Krogh, G. Perspective—Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organ. Sci. 2009, 20, 635–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nonaka, I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 1994, 5, 14–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nonaka, I.; Umemoto, K.; Senoo, D. From information processing to knowledge creation: A paradigm shift in business management. Technol. Soc. 1996, 18, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, D.J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 2007, 28, 1319–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Antunes, H.D.J.G.; Pinheiro, P.G. Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory. JIK 2020, 5, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morris, M.G.; Venkatesh, V.; Ackerman, P.L. Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: An extension to the theory of planned behavior. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2005, 52, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Culpan, O. Attitudes of end-users towards information technology in manufacturing and service industries. Inf. Manag. 1995, 28, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosenbusch, K. Technology intervention: Rethinking the role of education and faculty in the transformative digital environment. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 2020, 22, 87–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sigala, M.; Chalkiti, K. Knowledge management, social media and employee creativity. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 45, 44–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Heijden, B.I.J.M.; Boon, J.; van der Klink, M.; Meijs, E. Employability enhancement through formal and informal learning: An empirical study among Dutch non-academic university staff members. Int. J. Train. Dev. 2009, 13, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Callanan, M.; Cervantes, C.; Loomis, M. Informal learning. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 2011, 2, 646–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Froehlich, D.E.; Segers, M.; Beausaert, S.; Kremer, M. On the relation between task-variety, social informal learning, and employability. Vocat. Learn. 2019, 12, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Froehlich, D.E.; Beausaert, S.; Segers, M.; Gerken, M. Learning to stay employable. Career Dev. Int. 2014, 19, 508–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ross, C.; Orr, E.S.; Sisic, M.; Arseneault, J.M.; Simmering, M.G.; Orr, R.R. Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2009, 25, 578–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bryant, J.A.; Sanders-Jackson, A.; Smallwood, A.M. IMing, textmessaging, and adolescent social networks. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 2006, 11, 577–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wlodkowski, R.J.; Ginsberg, M.B. Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn: A Comprehensive Guide for Teaching All Adults, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Brooks, S.; Roberts, E. ‘Simultaneous immersion’: How online postgraduate study contributes to the development of reflective practice among public service practitioners. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2016, 24, 1692–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pintrich, P.R.; Smith, D.A.F.; Garcia, T.; McKeachie, W.J. A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ); National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning; The University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- De Lange, A.H. What about Causality? Examining Longitudinal Relations between Work Characteristics and Mental Health. Ph.D. Thesis, Offsetdrukkerij Ridderprint, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Griffin, M.A.; Parker, S.K.; Mason, C.M. Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: A longitudinal study. J. Appl. Psychol. 2010, 95, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed.; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Williamson, B.; Eynon, R.; Potter, P. Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learn. Media Technol. 2020, 45, 107–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Carril, S.; Añó, V.; González-Serrano, M.H. Introducing TED talks as a pedagogical resource in sport management education through YouTube and LinkedIn. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whiting, A.; Williams, D. Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qual. Mark. Res. 2013, 16, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Weick, K.E. Enactment and the boundaryless career: Organizing as we work. In The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era; Arthur, M.B., Rousseau, D.M., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1996; pp. 40–57. [Google Scholar]
- Froehlich, D.E.; Mingyang, L.M.; van der Heijden, B.I.J.M. Work in progress: The progression of competence-based employability. Career Dev. Int. 2018, 23, 230–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hemsley, J.; Mason, R.M. The nature of knowledge in the social media age: Implications for knowledge management models. In Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 4–7 January 2012; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 3928–3937. [Google Scholar]
M | SD | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) Social media use for professional development _ exploitation level 1 | 4.69 | 1.55 | ||||||||
(2) Social media use for professional development _ exploitation level 2 | 4.48 | 1.51 | 0.71 ** | |||||||
(3) Social media use for professional development _ exploitation level 3 | 4.48 | 1.50 | 0.71 ** | 0.77 ** | ||||||
(4) Motivation | 3.18 | 0.76 | 0.31 ** | 0.36 ** | 0.41 ** | |||||
(5) Occupational expertise | 4.93 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.10 | ||||
(6) Anticipation and optimization | 4.32 | 0.77 | 0.04 | 0.24 * | 0.06 | −0.06 | 0.53 ** | |||
(7) Corporate sense | 4.67 | 0.86 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.21 * | 0.03 | 0.53 ** | 0.52 ** | ||
(8) Personal flexibility | 4.51 | 0.62 | 0.02 | −0.05 | −0.06 | −0.08 | 0.55 ** | 0.45 ** | 0.57 ** | |
(9) Balance | 3.78 | 0.86 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.39 ** | 0.58 ** | 0.41 ** | 0.38 ** |
Occupational Expertise T2 | Anticipation and Optimization T2 | Corporate Sense T2 | Personal Flexibility T2 | Balance T2 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | B | SE | ß | B | SE | ß | B | SE | ß | B | SE | ß | B | SE | ß |
Constant | 3.35 | 0.46 | 3.20 | 0.49 | 3.44 | 0.53 | 3.49 | 0.45 | 2.08 | 0.51 | |||||
Occupational expertise T1 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 0.37 *** | ||||||||||||
Anticipation and optimization T1 | 0.25 | 0.09 | 0.27 ** | ||||||||||||
Corporate Sense T1 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.26 * | ||||||||||||
Personal flexibility T1 | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.34 *** | ||||||||||||
Balance T1 | 0.34 | 0.10 | 0.33 *** | ||||||||||||
Social media use for PD_1 | −0.05 | 0.06 | −0.13 | −0.10 | 0.07 | −0.20 | −0.10 | 0.09 | −0.17 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.06 |
Social media use for PD_2 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.48 ** | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.08 | −0.01 | 0.07 | −0.02 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.26 |
Social media use for PD_1 | −0.06 | 0.07 | −0.14 | −0.11 | 0.08 | −0.22 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.19 | −0.08 | 0.07 | −0.20 | −0.12 | 0.10 | −0.20 |
Motivation | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.15 | −0.01 | 0.11 | −0.11 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.04 |
R2 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.17 |
Occupational Expertise T2 | |||||
Moderation | B | T | p | F | R2 |
Social media use for PD_1 * Motivation | −0.08 | −1.25 | 0.22 | 4.38 | 0.16 |
Social media use for PD_2 * Motivation | −0.06 | −1.10 | 0.27 | 3.89 | 0.15 |
Social media use for PD_2 * Motivation | −0.08 | −1.54 | 0.13 | 4.60 | 0.17 |
Anticipation and optimization T2 | |||||
B | T | p | F | R2 | |
Social media use for PD_1 * Motivation | −0.08 | −1.04 | 0.30 | 2.67 | 0.10 |
Social media use for PD_2 * Motivation | −0.07 | −1.13 | 0.26 | 3.64 | 0.14 |
Social media use for PD_2 * Motivation | −0.06 | −0.83 | 0.41 | 2.54 | 0.10 |
Corporate sense T2 | |||||
B | T | p | F | R2 | |
Social media use for PD_1 * Motivation | −0.08 | −0.94 | 0.35 | 2.31 | 0.09 |
Social media use for PD_2 * Motivation | −0.02 | −0.32 | 0.75 | 2.32 | 0.09 |
Social media use for PD_2 * Motivation | −0.05 | −0.72 | 0.47 | 2.62 | 0.10 |
Personal flexibility T2 | |||||
B | T | p | F | R2 | |
Social media use for PD_1 * Motivation | −0.05 | −0.84 | 0.40 | 2.66 | 0.11 |
Social media use for PD_2 * Motivation | −0.04 | −0.81 | 0.42 | 2.81 | 0.11 |
Social media use for PD_2 * Motivation | −0.04 | −0.79 | 0.43 | 3.10 | 0.12 |
Balance T2 | |||||
B | T | p | F | R2 | |
Social media use for PD_1 * Motivation | −0.03 | −0.39 | 0.70 | 3.93 | 0.15 |
Social media use for PD_2 * Motivation | −0.06 | −0.90 | 0.37 | 4.52 | 0.17 |
Social media use for PD_2 * Motivation | 0.03 | 0.35 | 0.73 | 3.63 | 0.14 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Habets, O.; Van der Heijden, B.; Ramzy, O.; Stoffers, J.; Peters, P. Employable through Social Media: An Intervention Study. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5093. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095093
Habets O, Van der Heijden B, Ramzy O, Stoffers J, Peters P. Employable through Social Media: An Intervention Study. Sustainability. 2021; 13(9):5093. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095093
Chicago/Turabian StyleHabets, Omar, Beatrice Van der Heijden, Omar Ramzy, Jol Stoffers, and Pascale Peters. 2021. "Employable through Social Media: An Intervention Study" Sustainability 13, no. 9: 5093. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095093
APA StyleHabets, O., Van der Heijden, B., Ramzy, O., Stoffers, J., & Peters, P. (2021). Employable through Social Media: An Intervention Study. Sustainability, 13(9), 5093. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095093