Systematic Literature Review on Self-Assessment Inventory for Quality Teaching among Islamic Education Teachers
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
This work is of interest as it reflects the impact of teacher behavior on the quality of teaching and how self-assessment has become an emerging trend to sustain education, providing an option for teacher development. Thus, this review identifies the aspects of teaching behavior and the quality of teaching, and the instruments of self-evaluation in the teaching profession, being of value to help teachers prepare to cultivate aspects of quality of teaching behavior and carry out practices thoughtful for your personal development. The methodological approach is correct and the results respond to the intentions of the study.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
I would like to thank the opportunity of reviewing the article entitled "Systematic Literature Review on Self-Assessment Inventory for Quality Teaching among Islamic Education Teachers".
The study is interesting; addresses an important a current topic.
Here are my comments and suggestions about the article:
(a) The research question or study objective is clearly defined.
(b) The methods are sufficiently explained to allow replication of the study.
(c) Results address the research question or purpose.
(d) Discussion and conclusions are confirmed by results.
(e) References are current and relevant.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
This article is interesting. It follows a clear structure and is supported by a noteworthy scientific bibliography. It proposes initiatives that can contribute high quality to the Islamic teaching-learning system, and analysis of them are in the very essence of Islamic culture and religion, as occurs with the reflective self-evaluation of teachers (with replication in the students), presented in the Quran and Sunnah. The impact of creativity on everything is also another aspect analyzed. Through PRISMA, and the use of three databases: Web of Science, Scopus Google Scholar, tools, initiatives and methodologies that can increase the quality of teaching-learning processes are presented.
However, it would be necessary to argue in greater depth about the reasons why the aforementioned databases have been considered, and not others. This point is crucial and decisive in the development of the article and its conclusions, and therefore should be reinforced.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
