Next Article in Journal
Environmental Impacts of Organic and Biodynamic Wine Produced in Northeast Italy
Next Article in Special Issue
The Circular Economy Concept in the Outdoor Sporting Goods Industry: Challenges and Enablers of Current Practices among Brands and Retailers
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Architecture Based System for the Establishment of Sustainable Environment in a Construction Site with 433 MHz LoRa and 2.4 GHz Zigbee
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Management of High School Athletics: A Comparative Study of the U.S. and South Korea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Homogeneity or Heterogeneity: An Institutional Theory View on Circular Economy Practices in the Outdoor Sporting Goods Industry

Department for Sports Economics and Sports Management, Sports Science Faculty, Leipzig University, 04109 Leipzig, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(10), 6279; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106279
Submission received: 17 March 2022 / Revised: 16 May 2022 / Accepted: 18 May 2022 / Published: 21 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Management of Sport Organizations)

Abstract

The concept of a circular economy (CE) has recently gained attention within the field of corporate sustainability, including the textile sector. Although CE-related literature often mentions actors from the outdoor sporting goods industry (OSGI) as forerunners, an analysis of their CE implementation is missing. Thus, in this paper, we attempt to identify the structure of the current state of CE activities in this field. To develop the study, we used a qualitative methodology through content analysis of documents as well as expert interviews, taking an institutional theory (IT) view to support that analysis. Our findings indicate that many outdoor brands and retailers are engaged in practices related to the CE and that homogeneity among these practices varies between moderate to high. Thus, we assume that processes of institutional isomorphism are in place and that there will be increasingly uniform CE practices in the OSGI in the future. Our study not only contributes to a more organised understanding of the diverse CE playing field, as it adds an industry-specific perspective to the literature, but it also helps managers to draw practical implications.
Keywords: institutional isomorphism; organisational fields; sustainability; recycling; reuse; repair; reduce institutional isomorphism; organisational fields; sustainability; recycling; reuse; repair; reduce

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fuchs, M.; Hovemann, G. Homogeneity or Heterogeneity: An Institutional Theory View on Circular Economy Practices in the Outdoor Sporting Goods Industry. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6279. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106279

AMA Style

Fuchs M, Hovemann G. Homogeneity or Heterogeneity: An Institutional Theory View on Circular Economy Practices in the Outdoor Sporting Goods Industry. Sustainability. 2022; 14(10):6279. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106279

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fuchs, Michael, and Gregor Hovemann. 2022. "Homogeneity or Heterogeneity: An Institutional Theory View on Circular Economy Practices in the Outdoor Sporting Goods Industry" Sustainability 14, no. 10: 6279. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106279

APA Style

Fuchs, M., & Hovemann, G. (2022). Homogeneity or Heterogeneity: An Institutional Theory View on Circular Economy Practices in the Outdoor Sporting Goods Industry. Sustainability, 14(10), 6279. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106279

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop