Next Article in Journal
Alterations of Historic Rural Landscape Based on the Multifunctional Approach: The Case of Coastal Fishing Villages in the Yangtze River Basin
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Sustainable Processing Mode for Burr Classified Prediction of Weak Rigid Drilling Process Using a Fusion Modeling Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Innovation and Technological Management Model in the Tequila Sector in Mexico

by
Antonia Terán-Bustamante
1,*,
Antonieta Martínez-Velasco
2,
Víctor Manuel Castillo-Girón
3 and
Suhey Ayala-Ramírez
4
1
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad Panamericana, Ciudad de México 03920, Mexico
2
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Ciudad de México 03920, Mexico
3
Departamento de Ciencias Económico Administrativas, Centro Universitario de los Valles, University of Guadalajara, Ameca 46600, Mexico
4
Departamento de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Centro Universitario de los Valles, University of Guadalajara, Ameca 46600, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(12), 7450; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127450
Submission received: 18 April 2022 / Revised: 6 June 2022 / Accepted: 13 June 2022 / Published: 18 June 2022

Abstract

:
Creativity, ideas, and an entrepreneurial attitude are needed to innovate. However, it is also necessary to have practical instruments that allow innovations to be reflected in the company. One of those tools is technology. This research aims to analyze innovation and technology in the tequila industry through Bayesian networks with machine learning techniques. Likewise, an innovation and technology management model will be developed to make better decisions, which will allow the company to innovate to generate competitive advantages in a mature low-tech industry. A model is made in which the critical factors that influence management innovation and technology optimally to generate value translate into competitive advantages. The evidence shows that the optimal or non-optimal management of knowledge management and its various factors, through the causality of the variables, allow the interrelation to be more adequately captured to manage it. The results show that the most relevant factors for adequate management of innovation and technology are knowledge management, sales and marketing, organizational and technological architecture, national and international markets, cultivation of raw materials, agave, and management, use of waste, and not research and development.

1. Introduction

Innovation is increasingly important, particularly in economic crises like the one we are currently experiencing caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, to innovate, one must consider two key elements within the firm: the management of innovation and technology. These are dynamic processes that need to be considered strategically to generate value.
Innovation is a crucial factor in economic development for companies. Currently, in the knowledge economy, more accelerated innovation processes are developed that generate new products, production processes, and distinctive forms of marketing, commercialization, and organization, which contribute to raising competitiveness, the economic growth of the firm, and at the same time impact the well-being and quality of life of people [1,2].
The company will look for tools that allow it to innovate, improve its productivity, and have competitive advantages. One of those tools that allow the company to innovate is technology management (GT) because the company’s activities related to innovation have a more significant impact to the extent that they are adequately managed, their processes are well defined, they are carried out systematically, and they have an area that coordinates them [3].
COVID-19 affected almost all sectors of the economy; however, the tequila sector in 2021 grew. Production increased by 41.2% compared to 2020, reaching 487.3 million liters produced. On the other hand, exports also registered their highest level in history, reaching 310.5 million liters. This figure represents 17.6% compared to the same period in 2020. It is worth mentioning that 70% of the tequila exported is bottled from the origin, which translates into a more significant economic benefit for the territory protected by the designation of origin tequila (DOT) [4].
Along with production, the consumption of agave grew, presenting an increase of 43.5%, reaching 1 million 866 thousand tons. That is also a historical high for tequila agribusiness [4].
Two other figures that are added to the previous records in the year 2022 of 2021 are the number of registered trademarks. At the end of 2021, the CRT registered 1913 trademarks, while in the year 1995, there were only 516 trademarks; for their part, the registered agave growers at the end of 2021 reached a critical number of 25 thousand agave producers; in 2014, there were barely 3000 agave growers. Therefore, the above figures represent new records for this production chain [4]. The tequila industry has established itself as one of the leading agribusinesses in Mexico by producing one of the most emblematic alcoholic beverages worldwide [5] (Gallardo, 2019); however, to innovate and adopt new technologies throughout the sector, it has to focus on addressing the problems that it presents integrally.
The main problems faced by the tequila industry are the following:
  • Many medium and small companies compete with large companies.
  • Availability and supply of raw material, which suffers from cyclical crises that fluctuate over the years and have a considerable impact on both production levels, costs, and all the points mentioned for the production of tequila and the different distillates [6].
  • The adulterations.
  • Sustainability, since its treatment processes for some types of waste, such as stillage, are not yet fully efficient.
  • Dissimilar use and development of technology between large and smaller companies, which continue to use old processes.
In addition to the above, it is necessary to consider that the tequila industry is a mature low-tech industry, where there is low intensity in research and development (R&D).
Derived from the previous problem, the questions that guide the research are: What are the main factors to innovate in a mature low-tech sector like tequila? What are the critical factors in the optimal management of innovation and technology in the tequila industry? Using an innovation and technology management model, how can a company in the tequila sector make better decisions to innovate new products/services, processes, sales and marketing, and the organization? What are the best correlations between the various factors in the innovation management model in the tequila industry?
This research aims to analyze innovation and technology in a mature low-tech sector such as the tequila industry. For this purpose, a predictive decision-making model is designed through Bayesian networks with machine learning techniques.
This research is structured into three sections. The first section addresses the theoretical framework, specifically the management of innovation and technology and its relationship with knowledge. Characterization of the tequila sector in Mexico is also made. The second section presents the methodology of analysis and construction of the tequila model based on Bayesian networks (BNs). Finally, the third section presents the results, discussion, and conclusions.

2. Theoretical Framework

2.1. Innovation and Technology Management: Key Elements

Management contemplates the activities from which the human being reflects his creativity and ways of adapting to the context in which he participates. It is the form from which it uses the available knowledge, both theoretical and practical, and the forms in which it manifests itself (artifacts, experience, processes, systems, and products/services) [7].
Innovation and its management are an important issue for high-tech industries and lower technological industries and companies because it has a significant impact on competitiveness.
Technology is applied knowledge (scientific, technical, and traditional). It is a set of knowledge about techniques that can encompass both knowledge and the tangible materialization of that knowledge in a production process, in a system, machinery, or equipment [7].
It is action-oriented practical knowledge; it involves the systematic application of scientific knowledge or other knowledge organized into practical tasks. It is a knowledge whose application is oriented to a specific end to solve action problems, and its object is not simply to know but to act. That is, a knowledge that one has not only in terms of knowledge but also knowing how to do [8,9] and why to do it [10].
Technology integrates components associated with innovation. Innovation is a complex concept, which according to Schumpeter [11], is related to that process of creative destruction in which you have to rebuild to innovate. This process is both a means and an end for companies to respond faster to customer needs and achieve advantages in a global economy. It is about managing a process that always seeks improvements in itself. Nevertheless, it also delivers new products and services to customers efficiently, effectively, and faster than the competition or improves the delivery of existing products and services by improving processes [3,10].
Currently, innovation is a constant process in companies, in which changes are continuously introduced in their products and processes, new organizational methods are applied, new business methods are implemented, essential changes are implemented in the company, and new knowledge is acquired, among others [1,3].
Therefore, innovation has become a core factor in the company that allows it to generate value for its implementation and achieve benefits that are reflected in profitability due to the risks assumed [3,9].
Therefore, the company will look for tools that allow it to innovate, improve its productivity, and have competitive advantages. One of these tools that allow the company to innovate is the management of technology (GT) because the company’s activities related to innovation have a more significant impact to the extent that they are properly managed, have well-defined processes, are carried out systematically, and have an area that coordinates them [2,3,10,12,13].
Technological management should be seen as the process that allows acquiring knowledge necessary to make technological innovations; that is, value is created for the company since the efficiency of operations is increased [14].
The company must be able to develop technological capabilities through its management that allow it to identify, adopt, use, dominate, modify, and/or create technologies and make use of new or existing knowledge for the development of new products and improvement in products, processes [15] and the company itself, which enable its sustainability over time [2,3,7,9,10].
The Cotec Foundation [8] conceptualizes technological management as the organization and direction of human and economic resources to increase the creation of new knowledge. The generation of technical ideas allows obtaining new products, processes, and services or improving existing ones; the development of these ideas in prototypes and their transfer to the manufacturing, marketing, and use phases.
For Solleiro and Castañon [16], technology management is the set of tools and techniques that allow an organization to properly take advantage of its resources (people, money, machines, and information, among others) through the elaboration and execution of innovation plans.
For its part, the National Technology and Innovation Award includes five functions to manage innovation: (i) monitor, (ii) plan, (iii) enable, (iv) protect, and (v) implement [17].
For the Mexican Standard NMX-GT-003-IMNC-2008 on Technology Management [18], adopting a technology management system is a strategic decision of the organization. Therefore, its design and implementation in an organization are influenced by its different needs [3,18].
Barletta et al. [19] argue that innovation is the result of multiple factors that go beyond the activities carried out in R&D laboratories and include a combination of routines and solutions to problems both inside and outside the R&D laboratory.
According to the above, to understand the explanatory factors of these activities, it is necessary to understand innovative behavior as a complex phenomenon that is part of the firm’s competencies.

2.1.1. Management of Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge

Innovation management requires capturing the continuously created knowledge, which is integrated into work routines when defining long-range strategies or complex problems that demand more structured decision-making. In all cases, knowledge is required. Therefore, it is necessary to understand how it is valued economically, in the organization, and socially and created, used, disseminated, managed, and changed [7].
Innovation implies applying new knowledge; for this reason, companies follow particular learning processes and have defined trajectories that influence their development. Through these learning processes, companies build competencies.
Learning is a process that involves repetition and experimentation, which makes it possible to perform tasks better and faster and identify new production opportunities [3,20].
According to the above, managing knowledge does not necessarily mean innovating; the relevant thing is knowing and understanding how to manage it to influence company improvements. That is, innovations are made in any of its possible forms. That is, to know the dynamics of planning, organizing, controlling, and directing the process so that when used, it has a productive result so that it becomes a conscious and deliberate act of creation, access, use, and protection. Technological learning refers to the dynamic process of acquiring technological capabilities.
Companies learn over time, accumulate knowledge and technological capabilities, progressively undertake new activities, and acquire new technological capabilities. Studies tend to analyze technological learning processes and capacity-building processes together [21].
External sources include strategic alliances and licensing agreements; independent suppliers of materials, components, and equipment; technical analysis of competitors’ products; research institutes and universities; experts and consulting firms; patents; conferences; professional and scientific journals; fairs and exhibitions, among others.
Therefore, the learning process is fundamental in the construction of innovation capabilities. The ability to learn and accumulate knowledge over time is the essence of the innovation process, and this is built through its management.
Therefore, knowledge and the development of learning processes become critical elements in generating competitive advantages.
Innovation is a process that enables value to be created and captured from ideas.
Successful innovation management routines are not easy to acquire. Because they represent what a particular firm has learned over time, through a process of trial and error, they tend to be very firm specific.
From a general perspective, knowledge is relevant for low-tech firms and can be conceived as practical knowledge, where it cannot always be distinguished from scientifically generated knowledge. In other words, the adaptation of the process is constructed in an application-oriented form—by doing—are based on the accumulated practical knowledge of the company and the tacit knowledge of people [22].

2.1.2. Innovation in Low-Tech Industries or Non-Research-Intensive

According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) [23], a firm’s technological level is related to its intensity and expenditure on R&D. Thus, in the classification, there are companies and sectors of high-tech, medium-tech, and low-tech, measured by the results and impact of R&D.
For Tidd and Bessant [24], innovation and competitive success are not simply about high-technology companies, innovating is about learning. In recent decades, literature on innovative activities in sectors and firms that do not carry out formal R&D activities has become widespread, mainly in Germany and Spain [19,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34] among others.
However, derived from specific studies, especially in the manufacturing industry, these researchers agree that studies of innovation are reduced to the analysis of the intensity of formal R&D. For this reason, it is only possible to explain the behavior of a part of the productive structure, generally based on knowledge-intensive activities.
However, a significant proportion of studies confirm a strong influence of other factors on the rest of the productive structure. In other words, different types of resources and skills are mobilized that can compensate for the absence of formal efforts in internal R&D [22,31].
In these companies, the primary sources of knowledge to innovate come from external laboratories, customers, and suppliers. Bender and Laestadius [26] and Rammer, Czarnitzki, and Spielkamp [27] argue that, especially in the case of small and medium-sized companies, R&D laboratories are often replaced by the development of social technologies, which are associated with human resource management, work organization, and the search for external sources of innovation.
Bender and Laestadius [26] also suggest that formal R&D is not an essential asset that firms have to generate innovation processes, which are their skills to transform codified knowledge into specific knowledge contextualized in each process organization. Moreover, tacit knowledge allows them to utilize dispersed organizational knowledge to put it together creatively. To generate the organizational skills to innovate, in low-tech sectors, innovation is the result of a particular configuration of tacit and codified resources that firms build throughout their lives rather than strategies based on R&D [19].
According to Potters [29], R&D as an input for innovation (output) plays a minor role in low-tech sectors, as they are mature industries where many (small) producers operate at marginal cost. However, these sectors play an essential role in the economy.
For Som and Kirner [30,31], despite the debate and criticism of innovation with a high-tech focus, low manufacturing tech (LMT) research shows that non-research-intensive industries are surprisingly innovative and play an essential role in the development of modern economies. The LMT sector bases its innovation on modifying available technologies and existing knowledge to combine them in a hybrid concept with high-tech components.
According to Zouaghi [33] and Law [34], low-tech companies—in contrast with the complexity of high-tech companies—are characterized by focusing on innovation by process, organization, and marketing. For this reason, these companies have low internal innovation capabilities and are dependent on external knowledge acquisitions. In addition to the above low-tech firms, to improve their innovation performance, look for R&D human capital, while high-tech firms invest in R&D expenditures. However, due to low R&D investment, low-tech firms usually lack absorptive capacity [33].
Thomä [32] asserts that innovation at the firm level occurs with or without R&D, but rarely without acquired skills such as by doing, using, and interacting. These competencies are given through an informal learning process and know-how based on experience. Thus, the excessive emphasis on formal, internal R&D processes ignores the fact that competencies of this type are a prerequisite for successful innovation.
Knowledge management practices (KMP) are a critical factor that directly affects innovation activities [34]. Thus, knowledge is an essential and complex input.

2.2. Characterization of the Tequila Industry in Mexico

Tequila is one of the most famous drinks nationally and worldwide. It is obtained from the Agave Tequilana Weber Blue plant, better known as Agave Azul, which is produced in 181 municipalities in five states, where there is a denomination of origin for such purposes: Jalisco, its 125 municipalities; Michoacán, 30 municipalities; Nayarit, 8 municipalities; Tamaulipas, 11 municipalities; Guanajuato, 7 municipalities [35].
Tequila is a product that has been associated with the values of regional and national identity, popular culture, literature, and Mexican cinema [36]. Currently, its production constitutes one of the usual activities of Mexico and is significant in the agricultural and industrial development of various states, especially Jalisco [37,38]. Its distinction and importance come from its historical roots; its production and commercialization have reached great cultural and economic relevance [39].
The consolidation of the tequila industry in Mexico has been evident since the last century and now continues. However, in recent years, the popularity of the drink has been increasing, not only nationally but also internationally [40]. This is reflected in the increase in beverage production. From 1995 to 2008, production tripled, going from 104.3 to 312.1 million liters [4]. In terms of value, in 2019, the exports made by 162 companies represented USD 1874.00 (millions of dollars). In 2021, production reaches the highest point in its history, producing about 374 million liters of tequila, the highest volume recorded since 2000, representing, in the last two decades, an increase of 106% [4]. Germany, Spain, France, and Canada are the leading destinations for these exports. However, the United States is positioned as the leading destination country for this beverage [41,42].

2.2.1. Cultivation and Production of The Agave Tequilana Weber Blue Variety

Agave is a plant native to Mexico, there are more than 200 varieties, and only one can be used to produce tequila, the Agave Tequilana Weber Blue variety, which gives the drink its unique organoleptic characteristics and its denomination of origin (DO) [43].
According to the General Declaration of Protection of the Denomination of Origin Tequila (DO) and the NOM of Tequila, for the Weber Blue variety to be used in the manufacture of tequila, it must meet the following two requirements: 1. The Agave Tequilana Weber Blue must be grown within a geographical area delimited by the general declaration of the denomination of origin, and 2. Must be registered with the Tequila Regulatory Council (CRT), a tequila certification body [4].
The Agave Tequilana Weber Blue variety does not exist in wild form, and its vegetative propagation is carried out using the offspring produced by the mother plants, whose ideal planting time is just before the rainy season to favor the beginning of the development of the plant. The average time required by the plant to reach maturity ranges from seven to nine years, a period in which the maximum accumulation of carbohydrates is reached [6,44,45]. The main carbohydrate is inulin, a high molecular weight polymer of approximately 43 fructose monomers whose ends constitute a glucose molecule. For the harvest or Jima of the agaves, all the leaves are cut, and then the plant with a pineapple appearance is cut, which weighs between 20 and 90 kg [6,46].
Being the raw material for the elaboration of tequila, some companies also take advantage of it to elaborate functional foods such as inulin and fructose; the availability of agave is one of the strategic elements of this industry. Furthermore, given its long life cycle and that during its development it is exposed to various climatic factors such as frost/snowfall, droughts, fires, pests, and diseases, the planning of the crop is essential and must be aligned with the market expectations of tequila. Thus, one of the priorities of the actors involved, particularly the Tequila Regulatory Council, is the inventory of the number of agaves planted according to their age, the place of planting, their owner, their phytosanitary status, their link with a tequila company, among other aspects [4,47,48].

2.2.2. The Process of Elaboration and Types of Tequila

Tequila is made through a process that, although it varies depending on the tools, artifacts, practical types, and techniques that are used, in general, is integrated into six phases: the cultivation and Jima of the agave, cooking, grinding, fermentation, distillation, and packaging for sale and marketing (Figure 1).
According to SAGARPA [44], although agave can be grown on land with a particular slope, the ideal is to do it on flat land whose preparation before planting must include proper subsoiling and fallowing, and be tracked, whitewashed, and quartered or marked. The harvest or Jima of agave usually occurs between 7 and 9 years after planting and translates into obtaining the pineapples or heads of the agave that, when transferred to the factory, undergo a cooking process.
The cooking aims to perform the hydrolysis of fructans to generate simple sugars, fructose, and glucose in an approximate ratio of 90/10, soften the agave for subsequent grinding and promote the generation of essential compounds for the aromatic profile of the final distillate [48].
The grinding consists of tearing cooked heads or pineapples to extract the sugars from the agave. Fermentation is the biochemical breakdown that results in transforming agave sugars into alcohol. Distillation is divided into three phases. In the first, the vinasses are separated from other components such as aldehydes and ketones, obtaining a low alcohol content. In the second, known as rectification, ethyl alcohol is concentrated and purified from other alcohols obtaining what is known as heads and tails. In economic terms, distillation consumes about 50% of the energy required in the production process, and, therefore, it is the phase where costs could be reduced through strategies that reduce energy consumption. [50]. With these operations, a tequila of 45° to 50° GL is obtained that can be immediately packaged as white tequila or move to a third phase, known as the aging process, whose objective is to give the tequila the color and the bouquet (scent and flavor) depositing it in barrels for a specific time which gives rise to different types of tequila [51].
The packaging of tequila differs according to the type of tequila. For example, in the case of mixed tequila and the sugar of the blue weber tequila, agave contains other types of sugars; its distribution can be in bulk or without packaging or packaging. On the contrary, 100% Agave Tequila needs to be packaged, usually in new glass containers and with its due labeling to show that the production of agave and the elaboration of tequila occurred within the denomination of origin zone [51].
As shown in Table 1, by the type of sugars used, tequila can be 100% tequila, mixed tequila, and due to the rest time, it is classified into white, young, and rested [49].

2.2.3. A Technical But Also Traditional Industry

One of the differentiating elements between companies in the tequila industry is the level of equipment and automation of the different phases of the production process [3,49,50,52]. Although it is not a rule, the most technical companies are those with the largest size and production capacity [53]. At the same time, the rest of the producers experience a hybridization of their processes, and even in many cases, small companies continue to use the artisanal method, as explained in Table 2.
According to the above, the composition of tequila is very complex, it is affected by each of the stages of its production process. Therefore, its scent and flavor—sensory characteristics—depend on the amount and type of volatile compounds present [50].

2.2.4. Waste and Environmental Sustainability in the Tequila Industry

During the tequila production process, various wastes are generated that, as a whole, place the tequila industry as one of the most polluting [54] and, therefore, this constitutes one of the significant challenges for the sector. The residues with the greatest impact are the leaves of the agave rosette, bagasse, and vinasses [55].
The leaves of the agave rose window represent about 14% of the usable portion of the plant that, despite its biotechnological potential, are left in the field when harvesting the pineapples or heads, constituting a residue that has no uses so far [45,56].
Bagasse is the fiber of the agave that is obtained once the pineapples have been cooked and ground to generate sugars that, during fermentation, will produce alcohols and other chemical compounds, which will be separated in distillation. In the production of one liter of tequila, between seven and eight kilograms of agave are required, which are converted into five kilograms of bagasse/wet base (residue) once the juice is extracted [45].
According to Moreno et al. [45], bagasse residues can become a raw material source for obtaining various by-products. For example, bagasse as a material to produce organic fertilizer stands out through composting incorporated into the crop fields as fertilizer. The potential of agave bagasse for the production of biofertilizers is very significant due to the recirculation of nutrients in the agave crops themselves. Some tequila companies are trying to change the bagasse composting process to a vermicomposting process to reduce time and improve agave waste management [45,48].
Bagasse can also be used as fuel in boilers, filling furniture and mattresses, fodder for birds and livestock, and brick and adobe making. Another alternative for its use is the one made by obtaining some enzymes with high commercial value that can be used in the development of new products such as biofuels such as bioethanol, mainly due to its hexose content that makes fermentation processes less complicated [45,48].
Vinasses are liquid residues composed of non-volatile substances generated and remain at the bottom of the still after distillation of fermented agave must [45]. In the vinasses remain the agave fibrils that were not retained in the juice filtration stage, depleted yeast cells, residual sugars, acids, esters, higher alcohols, and substances that give caramel color. Although these effluents are not classified as hazardous waste, they are considered complex wastewater [57,58] because they have a chemical oxygen demand more significant than 38,215 mg/L, total solids (ST) greater than 21,883 mg/L, and have a low pH of 3.5–3.9 [59,60].
Vinasses also contain high concentrations of phenolic compounds that give them a characteristic dark brown color [61]. Although they have some use as biofuels, their characteristics and the high volumes generated make vinasses a tremendous environmental concern [45,54,60], since their incorrect disposal can cause significant environmental impacts [62], in addition to the significant cost of treating vinasses through an evaporation-oxidation process in large vats [63].
This is especially worrisome in regions with high rates of tequila production, such as the state of Jalisco [64,65].
To find alternative solutions to this environmental problem, anaerobic biological processes have been presented, which, in addition to reducing the concentration of pollutants, make it possible to recover methane and hydrogen as potential energy sources within the same tequila production process [60,65,66]. However, currently, this treatment only occurs in large companies, while small and medium-sized companies do not have the financial resources.
On the other hand, the high agricultural and agro-industrial activities of this industry also lead to greater exploitation and contamination of water resources [67,68].
In this context, various eutrophic conditions have been identified in multiple bodies of water caused by excessive and uncontrolled discharges of solid waste and wastewater by agro-industrial activities, which generates anoxic conditions and toxic blooms of cyanobacteria, which can harm wildlife and even pose a threat to nearby settlements [69,70].
Thus, the reduction of this eutrophication demands better management practices for both solid waste and wastewater to reduce the amounts of organic matter and nutrient discharge that enter the hydrographic systems of Jalisco [67,68,71]. The foregoing is so relevant that the government of Jalisco has set a goal for 2030 to reduce its current GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions by 22%, of which 14% is attributed to waste management and sewage [72,73].

3. Materials and Methods

This research is qualitative (descriptive) and quantitative, with a correlational scope and based on information obtained through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. A focus group was carried out during the first two months of 2022. A total of four questionnaires were collected, five semi-structured script interviews with experts, cameras, and consultants. The questionnaire was applied to the leading companies in the tequila industry. These firms represent 68% [4] of the industry. These interviews were conducted with managers and key personnel performing essential activities and processes, such as production and administration. In addition, three interviews were conducted with consultants of the company and two with researchers from the university. All interviewees handle strategic information to generate knowledge and management of innovation and technology within the company or in the study sector.
The focus groups were based on experts’ opinions. This model was made to identify the main processes needed for technological innovation management in the tequila industry. The model was developed through a Bayesian network. Once the model was created, a database of 100 records was generated based on the patterns generated through the Bayes network. The data generated represents the network in the sense that it comes from a joint probability distribution modeled by the network. Several experiments were done, generating 1000-, 300-, and 100-record databases. The archive with 100 records was sufficient to obtain conclusions since there were no significant differences in the results in the other two cases.
Once the dataset was available, a classification was made through machine learning tools based on the objective variable management of innovation and technology. The most relevant variables were selected to predict the management of innovation and technology class or variable objective employing the RRelief metric. The central idea of the RRelief algorithm is to estimate the quality of variables based on how well it can distinguish between instances that are close to each other. RRelief calculates a variable score for each variable that can then be applied to classify and select the highest-scoring characteristics to select the most relevant variables to predict the management of innovation and technology variables.
The fundamental challenge in data mining or modeling is to identify and characterize the relationships between one or more data features and some target feature. The remaining features, which are usually not distinguished a priori in real-world problems, are not informative but contribute to the overall dimensionality of the problem space. This increases the computational load for the modeling methods. Feature selection is defined as the process of identifying relevant features and discarding irrelevant ones [74]. There are several types of methods for variable selection. Among them, the filter method stands out.
Filtering methods use an indirect measure calculated from the general characteristics of the training data as a pre-modeling step. Filters are generally fast and work independently of the induction algorithm. Therefore, selected features can be passed to any modeling algorithm. Filtering methods can be roughly classified according to the filtering measures they employ. Those are information, distance, dependency, consistency, similarity, and statistical measures.
Kira and Rendell [75] conceived the original Relief algorithm based on instance-based learning. As an individual evaluation, Relief computes an indirect statistic for each feature that can be used to estimate the feature’s relevance to the target variable. These feature weights can range from −1 (worst) to +1 (best). Its strengths are that it does not depend on heuristics, runs in low-order polynomial time, is noise tolerant, and resistant to feature interactions, as well as being applicable for binary or continuous data.
ReliefF is an adaptation of the original Relief algorithm, which is based on many neighbors user parameter k that specifies the use of k nearest hits and k nearest misses in the score update for each. This change increased the reliability of the weight estimate. It is also capable of handling missing data values. It also uses strategies to handle multiclassing. During the evaluation of multiclass problems, ReliefF finds the k closest bugs from each “other” class and averages the weight update based on the prior probability of each class [76].
Next, a clustering process was carried out, that is, unsupervised classification. Clustering is a set of machine learning techniques that select observation classes (clusters), which contribute identical characteristics. Where it happens that the same class has similar characteristics and the observation of separate groups shows a difference in features. It is a non-supervised learning method, where the group tries to identify a relationship between the data without being trained by the response variable (Figure 2).
The K-means grouping is the most direct and frequently practiced group method to categorize a data set in many classes [77].
Clustering was carried out using the K-means algorithm, where the number of clusters was selected based on the Silhouette metric that compares the distance between the elements in a cluster with the average distance between the elements of other clusters. It will make it possible to elucidate the factors that allow us to achieve the best results in terms of innovation (Figure 2).
Next, the relationship between the variables was modeled through a Bayesian network (BN). A BN is a probabilistic graphic model that represents a set of variables and their conditional dependencies through a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Bayesian networks can represent and solve decision problems under uncertainty; these are called influence diagrams [78].
In this work, the definition of the variables—parent node to a child—of the model is made up of 36 relevant factors to carry out the management of innovation and technology—6 parent nodes and 30 child nodes—which are presented in Table 3.
In this manner, the conceptual model is made and the Bayesian network was built from six parent nodes called competitive and technological intelligence, strategic planning, technological planning, human capital, intellectual property protection, and quality and risk management (Figure 3 and Table 4).

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Management of Innovation and Technology Model Results

The management of innovation and technology model’s result was to develop the best practices of the leading companies in the tequila industry in Mexico.
Once the model was proposed using a Bayes network, multiple assignments were made to the probabilities for each variable (node) based on the experts’ opinions until reaching the optimal configuration (Figure 4).
The probabilistic or propagation reasoning of probabilities is to disseminate the effects of evidence through the BN to know the subsequent probability of the other variables. That is, values are assigned to some variables (evidence), and the subsequent probability for the other variables is obtained, given the known variables.
In this way, the 97% probability of optimal management of innovation and technology was reached with the probabilities indicated in the model. That allows the company to generate value and competitive advantages.
It should be noted that the arcs that join the nodes have thickness and color intensity according to the strength of the interactions between nodes (Table 4).
The strength of influence is calculated from the conditional probability of the child node and expresses the distance between various conditional probability distributions over the child node conditional on the states of the parent node.
The variables protection of intellectual property and designation of origin have the most substantial interaction among all the variables.
The next step was the search for the most relevant variables for the classification, based on the objective variable management of innovation and technology. The RRelief metric indicates that the essential variables are knowledge management, MKT, organizational and technological architecture, national and international markets, cultivation of raw materials, agave, management, and use of waste (Table 5).
Next, the database clustering process was done. Two clusters were generated through the K-means algorithm; this allowed to group the records based on their similarities. In cluster 1 (C1) are grouped the registries with a denomination of origin and intellectual property protection. These pair of variables are the ones that showed strong linkage with each other. That is, the value of one of the influences that of the other (Figure 5).
Thus, C1 has the desirable characteristics to achieve innovation. This is shown by the relationship between the most relevant variables. C1 shows that if the protection of intellectual property variable has a “YES” value, the cultivation of raw material variable obtains the optimal value in most cases (see Figure 6).
Similarly, it was found that if the knowledge management variables have optimum value, the sales and MKT variable has optimum value in most cases (see Figure 7).

4.2. Innovation and Industrial Property in the Tequila Sector

The results show that in a low technology sector such as the tequila industry there is not much focus and investment towards research and development (R&D). However, there is innovation. Innovation has allowed this low-tech sector to improve agricultural management processes, facilitating activities and reducing the risks to which workers are exposed. Likewise, it has been possible to mechanize tasks that allow the establishment of plantations in places where labor is scarce.
According to Cárdenas [81], over several decades, there have been significant technological advances in the tequila industry, which have been taken advantage of in all stages of its production process: cooking, grinding, fermentation, and distillation. However, these advances have been exploited unevenly due to the abysmal differences between large, medium, and small companies.
In addition to the above, there is also innovation in its products, where premium and superpremium artisan tequilas stand out and all tequila drinks.
On the other hand, the intensity of the innovation process can measure its results—outputs—and the efforts made to innovate—inputs. One of these ways of measuring innovation has been the patents obtained as an indicator of the result.
In the case of patents, in 2012 the tequila sector had 92, and in 2021, it has 120, representing an increase of 30.4% [82]. Concerning trademarks, in the year 2022 there are 1590 registered trademarks of packaging at the national level with a denomination of origin and 380 registered trademarks of packaging abroad with a denomination of origin. In addition, the number of trademarks registered as a tequila drink is 226 certified under the NMX-049-NORMEX-2004 standard [4,79].
For the tequila industry, the primary protection element is the denomination of origin certificate. The number of companies that produce tequila certified with a denomination of origin amounts to 272 by 2022. In addition, there are currently 118 companies for mixed tequila, while among 100% tequila companies there are 154 [4].
According to the above, a strong influence of other factors was confirmed to innovate in the tequila industry. These factors are characterized by focusing on innovation by process, organization, and marketing, which can compensate for the absence of formal efforts in internal R&D [19,22,29,33,34].
In these sectors, the primary sources of knowledge to innovate come from social technologies associated with human resource management, work organization, and the search for external sources of innovation like customers and suppliers [19,26,27].
Therefore, R&D as an input for innovation (output) plays a minor in this mature low-tech sector [29]. Instead, innovation results from a particular configuration of tacit and codified resources that firms build throughout their lives rather than strategies based on R&D [19,29]. Thus, knowledge management practices (KMP) are a critical factor that directly affects innovation activities [32,34].

5. Conclusions

Innovation and technology management are crucial in creating value for companies by allowing people and companies to use knowledge and existing resources more efficiently to learn and innovate. Moreover, the ability to manage it for the benefit of the business, aligned with the rest of its strategic functions considering a dynamic environment such as the current one, will allow it to maximize its competitive advantages. In other words, it is learning to identify or create opportunities, developing products with added value, looking for new ways to serve different consumers, detecting where and how new markets can be created and grown, rethinking services, among others, and seeking a social impact.
Implementing an innovation and technology management model allows companies to make better decisions to innovate and have competitive advantages. The benefits of this model are reflected in the new products or services, savings due to the development of new processes; entering new markets, increased sales, and higher profitability.
Based on this, a model has been generated through a Bayes network based on expert opinions in the tequila industry. A set of data was obtained based on the existing patterns between the nodes (variables).
The analysis of the data generated through the model has shown that according to their relevance for the classification, the essential variables for innovation are knowledge management, marketing, organizational and technological architecture, national and international markets, cultivation of raw materials, and management and use of waste, among others.
Likewise, it is shown that the variables that are related to greater strength through the arcs that join the nodes that represent them in the model are protection of intellectual property and designation of origin, strategic planning and mission, vision, values, value system model and clients, protection of intellectual property and sales, and MKT. These relationships emphasize the aspects that need to be taken care of to consolidate innovation.
Thus, it is essential to note that the variables that represent the concepts taken into account by experts in the field should be monitored and improved, considering the synergy suggested by the relationships between them and the relevance found through the analysis of the data generated using the patterns found in the designed model.
On the other hand, innovation can be of vital importance for the performance of low-tech companies. However, a large part of the public policies to stimulate innovation is focused on R&D and in high-tech companies, which leaves out the low-tech sectors that have a significant impact on the economic development of countries. Moreover, the classification and use of the term low-tech sectors do not clarify the limits between high- and low-tech industries, affecting public policy formulation that supports these low-tech sectors.
In the case of the tequila sector, there are agricultural producers and small and medium-sized companies that could benefit from public policies focused on the knowledge of innovation and its application in their context. It would allow them to innovate to have competitive advantages and be more profitable and sustainable.
In summary, considering only formal R&D activities in low-tech industries leaves out a large part of the productive apparatus with different competencies to innovate and not necessarily traditional R&D activities.
In future work, it is recommended to consider more factors that improve innovation in the sustainability of the process. In this sense, relations with companies that participate in the world market for alcoholic beverages, mergers between these companies, and legal and informal national and international mechanisms regulate business networks and the consumption of these drinks.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T.-B., A.M.-V., V.M.C.-G. and S.A.-R.; methodology, A.T.-B. and A.M.-V.; software, A.T.-B. and A.M.-V.; validation A.T.-B. and A.M.-V.; formal analysis, A.T.-B. and A.M.-V.; investigation, A.T.-B., A.M.-V., V.M.C.-G. and S.A.-R.; resources, A.T.-B., A.M.-V., V.M.C.-G. and S.A.-R.; data curation, A.T.-B. and A.M.-V.; writing—original draft preparation, A.T.-B., A.M.-V., V.M.C.-G. and S.A.-R.; writing—review and editing, A.T.-B. and A.M.-V.; visualization, A.T.-B., A.M.-V., V.M.C.-G. and S.A.-R.; supervision, A.T.-B., A.M.-V., V.M.C.-G. and S.A.-R.; project administration, A.T.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. OECD/Eurostat. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. In The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, 4th ed.; OECD Publishing/Eurostat: Paris, France; Luxembourg, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Terán-Bustamante, A.; Martínez-Velasco, A.; Dávila-Aragón, G. Knowledge Management for Open Innovation: Bayesian Networks through Machine Learning. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Terán-Bustamante, A.; Davila, G.; Castañon, R. Management of Technology and Innovation: A Bayesian Network Model. Económia Teória Práctica 2019, 50, 63–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Consejo Regulador del Tequila (CRT). Producción Total: Tequila y Tequila 100%. 2022. Available online: https://www.crt.org.mx/EstadisticasCRTweb/ (accessed on 2 February 2022).
  5. Rosalba, C. Between traditions and modernity: Technological strategies at three tequila firms. Technol. Soc. 2006, 28, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Herrera-Pérez, L.; Esteban Valtierra-Pacheco, E.; Ignacio Ocampo-Fletes, I.; Mario, A.; Tornero-Campante, M.; Hernández-Plascencia, J.; Rodríguez-Macías, R. Esquemas de contratos agrícolas para la producción de agave tequilana weber en la región de Tequila, Jalisco. Agric. Soc. Desarro. 2018, 15, 619–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Jasso, J. Administración: Innovación, conceptos, prácticas y tendencias. In Innovación Ante la Sociedad del Conocimiento; Disciplinas y Enfoques; Plaza y Valdés: Mexico City, Mexico, 2010; ISBN 9780070218231. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fundación Cotec. Pautas Metodológicas en Gestión de la Tecnología y de la Innovación para Empresas; t. II, Perspectiva Empresarial; t. III, Herramientas de Gestión de la Tecnología, Casos Prácticos de Gestión de la Tecnología; TEMAGUIDE, Cotec: Madrid, Spain, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  9. Solleiro, J.L.; Castañon, R. Gestión Tecnológica: Conceptos y Prácticas. Coordinadores: Solleiro, José Luís y Castañón Rosario; Plaza y Valdés: Mexico City, Mexico, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  10. Terán-Bustamante, A. Competencias del Talento Humano y de la Organización para la Gestión de la Tecnología: El Caso de Una Empresa Farmacéutica. 2017: XVII Congreso Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica. 2021. Available online: https://repositorio.altecasociacion.org/handle/20.500.13048/1675 (accessed on 15 January 2022).
  11. Schumpeter, J. The Theory of Economic Development; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1934. [Google Scholar]
  12. Medellín, E. Gestión de Tecnología, su Desarrollo e Implantación en la Empresa. In Gestión de la Innovación: Una Visión Actualizada para el Contexto Iberoamericano; Editorial Academia: Havana, Cuba, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. Medellín, E. Gestión Tecnológica en Empresas Innovadoras Mexicanas. Rev. Adm. Inovação 2010, 7, 58–78. [Google Scholar]
  14. Perozo, E.; Nava, A. El Impacto de la Gestión Tecnológica en el Contexto Empresarial. Rev. Venez. Cienc. Soc. 2005, 9, 488–504. Available online: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/309/30990214.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  15. Hernández, J. Capacidades tecnológicas y organizacionales de las empresas mexicanas participantes en la cadena de valor de la industria aeronáutica. Econ. Teoría Práct. Nueva Época 2017, 47, 65–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Solleiro, J.L.; Castañón, R. Manual de Gestión Tecnológica para Pymes Mexicanas; CamBioTec: Mexico City, Mexico, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fundación de Premio Nacional de Tecnología e Innovación (FPNTI). Modelo Nacional de Tecnología e Innovación; Gobierno de México: Mexico City, Mexico, 2018.
  18. IMNC. NMX-GT-003-IMNC-2008, Norma Mexicana Sobre Gestión de la Tecnología-Sistema de Gestión Tecnológica-Requisitos; Governement of Mexico: Mexico City, Mexico, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  19. Barletta, F.; Suárez, D.; Yoguel, G. Teoría de la Innovación: Evolución, Tendencias y Desafíos Herramientas Conceptuales para la Enseñanza y el Aprendizaje, 1st ed.; Suárez, D., Erbes, A., Florencia Barletta, F., Eds.; Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento: Madrid, Spain, 2020; Available online: https://www.ucm.es/ediciones-complutense/teoria-de-la-innovacion (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  20. Teece, D.J.; Pisano, G.; Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 1997, 18, 509–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dutrénit, G.; Torres, A.; Vera-Cruz, A. Procesos de aprendizaje y construcción de capacidades tecnológicas en el nivel de empresa. In Analía Erbes y Florencia Barletta, 1st ed.; Suárez, D., Ed.; Ediciones Complutense; Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento: Los Polvorines, Argentina, 2020; pp. 265–302. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H.; Jacobson, D. Innovation in Low-Tech Firms and Industries; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2008; ISBN 978-1-84720-823-1. [Google Scholar]
  23. OECD. ISIC rev.3 Technology Intensity Definition—Classification of Manufacturing Industries Into Categories Based on R&D Intensities; OECD: Paris, France, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tidd, J.; Bessant, J. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 7th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bender, G. Peculiarities and Relevance of Non-Research-Intensive Industries in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Final Report of the Project Policy and Innovation in Low-Tech—Knowledge Formation, Employment & Growth Contributions of the ‘Old Economy’ Industries in Europe—Pilot; University of Dortmund: Dortmund, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bender, G.; Staffan, L. Non-science based innovativeness: On capabilities relevant to generate profitable novelty. Perspect. Econ. Political Soc. Integration 2005, 11, 123–170. [Google Scholar]
  27. Rammer, C.; Czarnitzki, D.; Spielkamp, A. Innovation Success of Non-R&D-Performers: Substituting Technology by Management in SMEs, ZEW Discussion Papers, No. 08-092, Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW). Mannhei. 2008. Available online: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/27569/1/dp08092.pdf (accessed on 3 June 2022).
  28. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. Low-Tech’ Innovations. Ind. Innov. 2008, 15, 19–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Potters, L. R&D in low-tech sectors. In IPTS Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation Sectors IPTS; European Communities: Luxembourg, 2009; Available online: https://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/contentype/publication/workingpaper/1568810976/R%26D%20in%20LowTech%20Sectors.pdf (accessed on 4 June 2022).
  30. Som, O.; Kirner, E. Low-Tech Innovation; Springer International: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Som, O.; Kirner, E.; Jäger, A. The Absorptive Capacity of Non-R&D-Intensive Firms; Som, O., Kirner, E., Eds.; Low-tech Innovation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Thomä, J. Dui mode learning and barriers to innovation—A case from Germany. Res. Policy 2017, 46, 1327–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Zouaghi, F.; Sánchez, M.; Martínez, M.G. Did the global financial crisis impact firms’ innovation performance? The role of internal and external knowledge capabilities in high and low-tech industries. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 132, 92–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Law, K.M.; Lau, A.K.; Ip, A.W. The Impacts of Knowledge Management Practices on Innovation Activities in High- and Low-Tech Firms. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 2021, 29, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Instituto de Información Estadística y Geográfica del Estado de Jalisco (IIEG). Tequila: Diagnóstico del Municipio Agosto 2021. 2022. Available online: https://iieg.gob.mx/ns/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Tequila.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2022).
  36. Olmedo-Carranza, B. El Tequila: De su Origen A su Desnaturalización. ¿A Quién le Pertenece su Conocimiento? Una Aproximación. Revista CENIC. Cienc. Quím. 2010, 41, 1–13. Available online: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=181620500061 (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  37. Cedeño, M.; Álvarez, J. Tequila production from agave: Historical influences and contemporary process. In The Alcohol Textbook, 4th ed.; Jacques, K.A., Lyons, T.P., Kelsall, D.R., Eds.; Nottingham University Press: Nottingham, UK, 2003; pp. 223–245. [Google Scholar]
  38. Coelho, A.; Castillo, V.M. “Mi Sueño”: Emprendedores y Tequila Artesanal en el Territorio del Agave Azul. In Proceedings of the IV Congresso Internacional de Investigação e Desenvolvimento Sócio-Cultural, Guadalajara, Mexico, 19–21 October 2006. [Google Scholar]
  39. Luna, R. La Historia del Tequila, de Sus Regiones y Sus Hombres; CONACULTA: Mexico City, Mexico, 1991.
  40. Castillo, V.; Coelho, A. Dinámicas de la cadena agave-tequila. Tendencias y adaptación a la globalización. In Agaves del Occidente de Mexico; Vázquez, A., Vargas, Y., Saldívar, S., Eds.; Universidad de Guadalajara-CUCBA, CRT, CIATEJ, LSU y CONAFOR: Mexico City, Mexico, 2007; pp. 160–182. [Google Scholar]
  41. Statista. Exportaciones de Tequila Desde Mexico de 1995 a 2020. 2021. Available online: https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/1170629/mexico-cantidad-exportada-tequila/ (accessed on 29 April 2022).
  42. Statista. Principales Países de Destino de las Exportaciones de Tequila de Mexico en 2020. 2021. Available online: https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/1058207/mexico-cantidad-exportada-tequila-pais-destino/ (accessed on 25 March 2022).
  43. Cámara Nacional de la Industria del Tequila. (CNIT). El Agave. 2022. Available online: https://www.tequileros.org/el-tequila/ (accessed on 26 January 2022).
  44. SAGARPA, Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. Agave Tequilero y Mezcalero Mexicano. Planeación Agrícola Nacional 2017–2030. 2017. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/257066/Potencial-Agave_Tequilero_y_Mezcalero.pdf (accessed on 7 February 2022).
  45. Moreno, R.; Escalante, A.; Verdugo, A.G.; De la Rosa, M.; Ortiz Basurto, R.I.; Orantes, C.; Palafox, L.; Castro, A.S.; Lappe, P. Bebidas Refrescantes y Alcohólicas de Agave. In Panorama del Aprovechamiento de los Agaves en Mexico; Estado del Arte publicado por agared-Red Temática Mexicana; Aprovechamiento Integral Sustentable y Biotecnología de los Agaves; Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco, A.C.: Mexico City, Mexico, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rivera, J.; Blanco, J. Agave-Tequila Rutas Tecnológicas 2014–2018. Proyecto FINNOVA: Sistema de Inteligencia Estratégica (THINK-TANK) Para la Identificación, Impulso, Coordinación y Transferencia de la I+D Innovadora Entre el CIATEJ y su Ecosistema Biotecnológico; CIATEJ: Guadalajara, Mexico, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  47. Consejo Regulador del Tequila (CRT). Agave y Tequila un Binomio de Éxito; Temacilli: Guadalajara, Mexico, 2016; Available online: https://www.crt.org.mx/images/Documentos/Libro/AGAVE_TEQUILA_UN_BINOMIO_DE_EXITO.pdf (accessed on 7 February 2022).
  48. Ramos, J.J. Procesos Del Tequila. Opciones Para el Tratamiento de los Residuos de la Industria Tequilera. Página Corporativa de Casa Sauza. 2017. Available online: https://www.casasauza.com/procesos-tequila-sauza/opciones-tratamiento-residuos-industria-tequilera (accessed on 4 January 2022).
  49. Ayala, S. Destilando Saberes. Los Gajes del Oficio Tequilero; Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de los Valle: Guadalajara, Mexico, 2016; ISBN 978-607-9470-00-3. [Google Scholar]
  50. Estarrón-Espinosa, M.; Ruperto-Pérez, M.; Padilla-de la Rosa, J.; Prado-Ramírez, R. Innovation in Continuous Rectification for Tequila Production. Processes 2019, 7, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bautista, J.; García, L.; Barboza, J.; Parra, L. El agave tequilana Weber y la producción de tequila. Acta Univ. 2001, 11, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Warren, W.; Aguilar, D.; Zárate, A.; Campos, A.; Romero, L. Development of a Predictive Model for Agave Prices Employing Environmental, Economic, and Social Factors: Towards a Planned Supply Chain for Agave-Tequila Industry. Foods 2022, 11, 1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tetreault, D.; McCulligh, C.; Lucio, C. Distilling agro-extractivism: Agave and tequila production in Mexico. J. Agrar. Chang. 2021, 21, 219–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gallardo, J. Industria del Tequila y Generación de Residuos. Revista Ciencia y Desarrollo; CONACYT: Mexico City, Mexico, 2019. Available online: https://www.cyd.conacyt.gob.mx/?p=articulo&id=287 (accessed on 7 February 2022).
  55. Abreu, J. Aprovechamiento de Bagazo de Agave Tequilana Weber para la Producción de Biohidrógeno. Master’s Thesis, Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (IPICYT), San Luis Potosí, Mexico, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  56. Íñiguez, G.; Hernández, R. Estudio Para la Rehabilitación de Una Planta de Tratamiento de Vinazas Tequileras Mediante un Floculante Polimérico de Poliacrilamida (PAM). Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient. 2010, 26, 299–311. Available online: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0188-49992010000400005&lng=es&tlng=e (accessed on 2 March 2022).
  57. Llangovan, K.; Linerio, J.; Álvarez, E.; Briones, M.; Noyola, A. Tratamiento anaerobio de vinazas tequileras. In Biodegradación de Compuestos Orgánicos; Ilangovan, K., Briones, R., Eds.; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico-Instituto de Ingeniería: Mexico City, Mexico, 1996; pp. 42–44. [Google Scholar]
  58. Linerio, J.E. Selección y evaluación de un sistema de tratamiento terciario para la depuración de vinazas tequileras. In Informe Técnico; Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco/Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología- Sistema de Investigación Regional José María Morelos: Guadalahara, Mexico, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  59. Íñiguez, G.; Peraza, F. Reduction of solids and organic load concentrations in tequila vinasses using a polyacrylamide (PAM) polymer flocculant. Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient 2007, 23, 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  60. López-López, I.A.; Dávila-Vázquez, G.; León-Becerril, E.; Villegas-García, E.; Gallardo-Valdez, J. Tequila Vinasses: Generation and Full Scale Treatment Processes. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Morán, R.G.; Sánchez, A.L.; Rodríguez, J.; Dávila, G.; Marino, E.N.; Dendooven, L.; Contreras, S.M. Utilization of vinasses as soil amendment: Consequences and perspectives. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Macías, A. Organización de la Industria del Tequila. Carta Económica Regional, Nº 54, Mayo–Junio, Mexico. 1997. Available online: http://www.cartaeconomicaregional.cucea.udg.mx/index.php/CER/article/view/7643 (accessed on 15 February 2022).
  63. Martinez, E.; Gortares, P.; Santiago, N.; Nápoles, J.; Gabriela, R.; De la Mora, C.; Leyva, L.; Humberto, L.; Meza, E. Tequila Still Distillation Fractioned Residual Streams for Use in Biorefinery. Energies 2020, 13, 6222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Macías, A. El cluster en la Industria del tequila en Jalisco, Mexico. Agroalimentaria 2001, 6, 55–72. Available online: http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1316-03542001000200005&lng=es&tlng=e (accessed on 15 February 2022).
  65. López-, A.; León, E.; Rosales, M.E.; Villegas, E. Influence of alkalinity and VFAs on the performance of an uasb reactor with recirculation for the treatment of Tequila vinasses. Environ. Technol. 2015, 36, 2468–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Montes-Moncivais, A.; Moreno, G.; Buitrón, G. Biological hydrogen production from tequila industry wastewater (YWP-012). In Proceedings of the 1st IWA Mexico National Young Water Professionals Conference, Mexico City, Mexico, 5–8 November 2018; Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica: Querétaro, Mexico, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  67. Montoya, H.A.; Contreras, C.S.; García, V.M. Estudio Integral de la Calidad del Agua en el Estado de Jalisco; Comisión Estatal del Agua: Guadalajara, Mexico, 1997.
  68. Abrol, V.; Sharma, P. Resource Management for Sustainable Agriculture; BoD—Books on Demand: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gradilla-Hernández, M.S.; de Anda, J.; Garcia-Gonzalez, A.; Montes, C.Y.; Barrios-Piña, H.; Ruiz-Palomino, P.; Díaz-Vázquez, D. Assessment of the Water Quality of a Subtropical Lake Using the NSF-WQI and a Newly Proposed Ecosystem Specific Water Quality Index. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Díaz-Vázquez, D.; Carrillo-Nieves, D.; Orozco-Nunnelly, D.A.; Senés-Guerrero, C.; Gradilla-Hernández, M.S. An integrated approach for the assessment of environmental sustainability in agro-industrial waste management practices: The case of the Tequila Industry. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 25, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jayme-Torres, G.; Hansen, A.M. Nutrient Loads in the River Mouth of the Río Verde basin in Jalisco, Mexico: How to Prevent Eutrophication in the Future Reservoir? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 20497–20509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gabinete de Prensa ISCIII. INECC Reitera su Compromiso Ante el Acuerdo de París con Rutas de Mitigación al Cambio Climático. 2018. Available online: http://www.gob.mx/inecc/prensa/inecc-reitera-su-compromiso-ante-el-acuerdo-de-paris-conrutas-de-mitigacion-al-cambio-climatico (accessed on 18 January 2022).
  73. SEMADET. Inventario Estatal de Emisiones de Gases y Compuestos de Efecto Invernadero (IEEGYCEI). 2018. Available online: https://semadet.jalisco.gob.mx/gobernanza-ambiental/cambio-climatico/inventario-estatal-de-emisiones-de-gases-y-compuestos-de (accessed on 22 January 2022).
  74. Urbanowicz, R.J.; Meeker, M.; La Cava, W.; Olson, R.S.; Moore, J.H. Relief-based feature selection: Introduction and review. J. Biomed. Inform. 2018, 85, 189–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kira, K.; Rendell, L.A. A practical approach to feature selection. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Machine Learning, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1–3 July 1992; pp. 249–256. [Google Scholar]
  76. Robnik-Šikonja, M.; Kononenko, I. Theoretical and empirical analysis of ReliefF and RReliefF. Mach. Learn. 2003, 53, 23–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Syakur, M.A.; Khotimah, B.K.; Rochman, E.M.S.; Satoto, B.D. Integration k-means clustering method and elbow method for identification of the best customer profile cluster. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2018; Volume 336, p. 012017. [Google Scholar]
  78. Martínez-Velasco, A.; Terán-Bustamante, A. Business Model Innovation and Decision-Making for the Productive Sector in Times of Crisis. In Business Recovery in Emerging Markets. Palgrave Studies in Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Growth; López-Fernández, A.M., Terán-Bustamante, A., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF). (2018: 13/03/2018). DECRETO Por el que se Reforman y Adicionan Diversas Disposiciones de la Ley de la Propiedad Industrial. Available online: https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5515853&fecha=13/03/2018#:~:text=%2D%20Se%20entiende%20por%20denominaci%C3%B3n%20de,producto%20se%20deban%20exclusiva%20o (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  80. Terán-Bustamante, A.; Martínez-Velasco, A.; López-Fernández, A.M. University–Industry Collaboration: A Sustainable Technology Transfer Model. Adm. Sci. 2021, 11, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cárdenas, E. Innovación en la industria del tequila: Historia y tendencias. Carta Económica Reg. 2022, 129, 93–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Worldwide Espacenet. Patent Search. 2022. Available online: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search?q=ctxt%20all%20%22agave%20tequilana%22 (accessed on 27 March 2022).
Figure 1. The tequila production process. Source: own elaboration [49,50].
Figure 1. The tequila production process. Source: own elaboration [49,50].
Sustainability 14 07450 g001
Figure 2. Methodology.
Figure 2. Methodology.
Sustainability 14 07450 g002
Figure 3. Management of innovation and technology model: variables and nodes.
Figure 3. Management of innovation and technology model: variables and nodes.
Sustainability 14 07450 g003
Figure 4. Bayes Network for management of innovation and technology in the tequila sector in Mexico.
Figure 4. Bayes Network for management of innovation and technology in the tequila sector in Mexico.
Sustainability 14 07450 g004
Figure 5. Scatter plot for protection of intellectual property and designation of origin grouped by cluster.
Figure 5. Scatter plot for protection of intellectual property and designation of origin grouped by cluster.
Sustainability 14 07450 g005
Figure 6. Scatter plot for cultivation of raw vs. protection of intellectual property grouped by cluster.
Figure 6. Scatter plot for cultivation of raw vs. protection of intellectual property grouped by cluster.
Sustainability 14 07450 g006
Figure 7. Scatter plot for knowledge management vs. sales and MKT grouped by cluster.
Figure 7. Scatter plot for knowledge management vs. sales and MKT grouped by cluster.
Sustainability 14 07450 g007
Table 1. Classification of tequila by the sugars of origin and the time of rest.
Table 1. Classification of tequila by the sugars of origin and the time of rest.
FactorType of TequilaCharacteristics
By type of sugarTequila 100%Made with 100% Weber Azul tequilana agave, sugar.
TequilaMade with 51% sugar from the blue Weber tequilana agave and the rest (49%) of total reducers, expressed in mass units, come from other sources (except other agave species).
By the rest timeMixed tequilaClear and transparent in color, it is bottled immediately after being distilled.
White tequilaThis tequila is softened with colorants and flavors, such as caramel.
Young tequilaWhite tequila that is left to rest in oak barrels for more than two months and up to a year. It maintains its blue agave flavor.
Rested tequilaAged in oak barrels for over a year. It has an amber color and a woody flavor.
Source: own elaboration [49,50].
Table 2. Technification of production processes in tequila producing companies.
Table 2. Technification of production processes in tequila producing companies.
Type of ProcessPhases of Production
CultivatingBaking or CookingGrindingFermenting Distilling
TraditionalBasic, rudimentary agricultural tools, i.e., machete and tillage stick (coa).Underground ovens are covered with stones on the inside. The oven consists of a circular cavity 4.60 m in diameter and 0.50 m deep.
Wood fuel.
A rolling stone pulled by oxen and/or mules grinds the baked agave cores.Wooden vats with a capacity of approximately 1500 L. The saccharimeter, an instrument locally called pesamiel, “weighs” the sugar concentration of the juices. Metal pots containing must are placed on the fire. They are heated until the alcohol reaches the point of evaporation.
From 10 to 12 years. Four days.From two to three days.From 12 days in summer up to 18 days in winter.From one to two days.
HybridBasic agricultural tools, i.e., machete and coa, are prioritized.Masonry oven with a thermometer on the door.
Fuel from diesel, tar, and pig manure.
An agave core shredder. Grinding machines were introduced in the 1950s.Stainless steel tubs with a capacity of up to 20,000 L.Steam-based copper or steel stills.
From 7 to 10 years.From 36 to 38 h.From one to two days.72 h.From one to two days.
TechnicalizedNew machinery is designed internally for planting and harvesting.Autoclaves bake or cook the agave at 90 to 110 degrees Celsius temperatures.An extruder grinds the agave. The raw agave enters on one end, and must, mezcal juices, and fiber come out on the opposite end. This machine has a high rate of extraction efficiency.The fermentation process is automated.Column distillation; allows a continuous process and reduces costs and distillation times.
Maturity mechanisms reduce the cycle to 5.5 years.18 h. 15 h.The fermentation time is considerably reduced.The distillation time is considerably reduced.
Source: own elaboration [49,50].
Table 3. Definition of the variables and nodes.
Table 3. Definition of the variables and nodes.
#VariableConceptDimension
1Competitive and Technological IntelligenceThe process of identifying, collecting, and analyzing information about the environment and the activities of an organization, as well as to time use of such information for decision-making.Optimum Regular Deficient
2Strategic PlanningIt is the plan that presents the strategy planning, defined for the organization, as the guiding thread.Yes/No
3Technological PlanningIt is the development of a strategic technology plan that allows selecting lines of action in the development of products/services according to the market’s needs and that focus on developing competitive advantages.Yes/No
4Human CapitalPeople with their talent translate into valuing the knowledge and skills that each worker has in a company.Qualified
Not Qualified
5Protection of Intellectual propertySafeguard all intangible assets of the company. The protection of innovation seeks to prevent the unauthorized use of an organization’s developments. It includes all the measures that the organization takes to ensure the benefits of exploiting the innovation.Yes
No
6Quality and Risk ManagementCoordinated activities to direct and control in an organization the possible risks to guarantee quality.Optimum Deficient
7Customer Needs and Opportunity DetectionAnalysis of customer needs and opportunities of the market. Who? What? How? Analytics.Optimum Regular Deficient
8Mission, Vision, and ValuesEntreprise philosophy. A firm’s statements are based on the core ethical values of an organization and are essential to its success because they give it direction. Yes
No
9Strategy ModelA plan that integrates and provides tools for decision-making and action plans in the face of a given scenario. Yes/No
10R+D*IResearch, development, and innovation.Optimum Regular
Deficient
11Best Production PracticesThe norms and standards of quality and best manufacturing practices.Optimum Regular
Deficient
12Compliance with Legal and Regulatory MaterialActivities and processes to comply with legal and regulatory standards.Yes/No
13Organizational and Technological ArchitectureIt integrates a complete vision of the company, its processes, and the available resources. It describes the strategy of products and services of the company, as well as the organizational, functional, process, and information aspects.Optimum Deficient
14Business IntelligenceSet of strategies, procedures, and activities whose objective is to present relevant business data and its environment for decision-making.Optimum Regular Deficient
15Universities and Research Centers Linkage/collaborationLinkage is the set of relationships established between universities and the productive sector, and its purpose is to transfer knowledge and technology.Yes/
No
16Designation of OriginThe name of a geographical area that contains that name, or another well-known denomination that refers to the area mentioned above, serves to designate a product as originating from the same, when the quality or characteristics of the product are due exclusively or essentially to the environment geographical, including natural and human factors, and which has given the product its reputation [79].Yes/No
17Trademarks and PatentsA trademark is a sign that makes it possible to differentiate the products or services of one company from those of another. Trademarks are intellectual property rights (IP). A patent is an exclusive right granted over an invention.Yes/No
18Sustainability and the EnvironmentThe harmonious coexistence of society and its environment, where the current population can satisfy its needs and improve its well-being using the available natural resources, but without compromising the quality of life of future generations.Optimum Regular Deficient
19Core CompetencesIt refers to the unique and differential knowledge or skills that a company has and that give it a competitive advantage.Optimum
Deficient
20Business Model StructureDesign process to create a widely new business model in the market, which is accompanied by a value proposition that generates or ensures a sustainable competitive advantage.Optimum Regular Deficient
21Official Standard Certifications, norms, standards, and rules.Optimum Regular Deficient
22Cultivation of Raw Material AgaveKnowledge of the soil and planting of agave. It includes all activities from planting to harvest.Optimum Regular Deficient
23Tequila Manufacturing -Knowledge of handling agave pineapples
-Pineapple crushing/cooking/grinding/agave juice extraction
-Fermentation
-Distillation
Optimum Regular Deficient
24Tequila PackagingTequila packaging according to official standards: NOM-006-SCFI-2012, Alcoholic Beverages-tequila-Specifications.Optimum Regular Deficient
25Commercialization an Marketing (MKT) CapacityUnderstand and satisfy customer needs. The process by which companies create value for customers and build strong relationships with them to capture their value in return. Search, promote, serve, and adapt markets.Optimum Regular Deficient
26Management and Use of WasteWaste collection and processing methods combine management options that include reuse and recycling efforts.Optimum Regular Deficient
27Ancestral Technical KnowledgeTechniques applied to the production of tequila based on ancient knowledge.Optimum Regular Deficient
28Modern TechnologiesModern techniques applied to tequila production based on technology.Optimum Regular Deficient
29Process ManagementIt is the management model of all value chain processes.Optimum Regular Deficient
30Customers II ExperienceWhom? How?
Delivery and capture value proposal.
Here is the customer experience perceived by the customer. The definition of the product or service I sell to clients.
I and II are the most important detonators of the model.
Optimum
Regular
Deficient
31Value System ModelStructure of value proposition, value creation, value and delivery, value capture, topology of value chain partners.
The value propositions. What are we offering to whom?
Target segment(s).
Product or service offering.
Revenue model.
Optimum
Deficient
32PositioningThe product’s positioning is divided first in terms of the product type: White, Young, Reposado, Añejo, or Extra Añejo. Moreover, second to the market to which it is directed: premium, superpremium, and ultra-premium. The companies promote the development of their brands through differentiated and defined positioning and marketing strategies for each product, trying to give a different brand essence and avoid positioning coincidences, and try to give value to the customer.Optimum Regular Deficient
33National and International MarketsSet of real and potential buyers both nationally and internationally.Optimum Regular Deficient
34Commercialization Capacity/MKTActions and procedures effectively introduce products/services to the market to satisfy customer needs.Optimum Regular Deficient
35Knowledge ManagementKnowledge management is the company’s ability to put the knowledge it has acquired at the service of those who need it within the company to develop new solutions and innovate. A systematic process of dissemination, use, generation, documentation, and enhancement of individual and organizational knowledge.
It search like this knowledge is used methodically for competitive advantages for the firm. [2,3,10,78,80].
Optimum Regular Deficient
36InnovationIt is the implementation of significant changes in its product, process, marketing, or organization. Innovation is a product or process (or a combination of both) that differs significantly from previous products and processes; it adds value.Yes/No
37Management of Innovation and Technology The learning process accelerates the transformation of ideas into innovations. It is the organization and management of resources to increase the creation of new knowledge and technical ideas toward making new products, processes, and services or improving existing ones [2,3,10,78,80].Optimum Regular Deficient
Table 4. Main correlations between variables for the management of innovation and technology model.
Table 4. Main correlations between variables for the management of innovation and technology model.
Variable 1Variable 2Strength
Protection of Intellectual propertyDesignation of Origin1.000
Strategic PlanningMission, Vision, Values0.588
Value System ModelClients0.404
Protection of Intellectual propertySales and MKT0.402
Quality and Risk ManagementLegal Compliance0.400
Business Model StructureTequila Manufacturing0.313
Quality and Risk ManagementSustainability and Environment0.311
Technological PlanningHuman Capital0.302
Sales and MKTNational and International Markets0.280
Competitive and Technological IntelligenceCustomer Needs Detection0.275
Process ManagementManagement of Innovation and Technology0.241
Value System ModelNational and international markets0.224
Legal ComplianceOfficial Rules0.192
Value System ModelPositioning0.184
Business Model StructurePacking0.167
Knowledge ManagementManagement of Innovation and Technology0.160
Sustainability and EnvironmentOfficial Rules0.151
Sustainability and EnvironmentManagement and Use of Waste0.132
Brands and PatentsOfficial Rules0.119
Universities and Research Centers Linkage/collaborationManagement and Use of Waste0.118
PackingValue System Model0.111
Table 5. Most relevant variables for classification.
Table 5. Most relevant variables for classification.
VariableRelieF
Knowledge Management0.082
MKT0.066
Organizational and Technological Architecture0.06
National and International Markets0.052
Cultivation of Raw Materials Agave0.046
Management and Use of Waste0.046
Human Capital0.044
Best Production Practices0.042
Competitive and Technological Intelligence0.03
Tequila Manufacturing 0.018
Business Intelligence0.016
Official Rules0.01
Value System Model0.008
Process Management0.006
Packing 0.004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Terán-Bustamante, A.; Martínez-Velasco, A.; Castillo-Girón, V.M.; Ayala-Ramírez, S. Innovation and Technological Management Model in the Tequila Sector in Mexico. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7450. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127450

AMA Style

Terán-Bustamante A, Martínez-Velasco A, Castillo-Girón VM, Ayala-Ramírez S. Innovation and Technological Management Model in the Tequila Sector in Mexico. Sustainability. 2022; 14(12):7450. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127450

Chicago/Turabian Style

Terán-Bustamante, Antonia, Antonieta Martínez-Velasco, Víctor Manuel Castillo-Girón, and Suhey Ayala-Ramírez. 2022. "Innovation and Technological Management Model in the Tequila Sector in Mexico" Sustainability 14, no. 12: 7450. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127450

APA Style

Terán-Bustamante, A., Martínez-Velasco, A., Castillo-Girón, V. M., & Ayala-Ramírez, S. (2022). Innovation and Technological Management Model in the Tequila Sector in Mexico. Sustainability, 14(12), 7450. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127450

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop