Next Article in Journal
Consumers’ Brand Preferences for Infant Formula: A Grounded Theory Approach
Previous Article in Journal
External Monitoring, ESG, and Information Content of Discretionary Accruals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Water Splitting by MnOx/Na2CO3 Reversible Redox Reactions

1
Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre of Soft Matter Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology (BUCT), Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China
2
Process and Environmental Technology Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2860 Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Group T Leuven Campus, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(13), 7597; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137597
Submission received: 4 June 2022 / Revised: 19 June 2022 / Accepted: 20 June 2022 / Published: 22 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Waste and Recycling)

Abstract

:
Thermal water splitting by redox reactants could contribute to a hydrogen-based energy economy. The authors previously assessed and classified these thermo-chemical water splitting redox reactions. The Mn3O4/MnO/NaMnO2 multi-step redox cycles were demonstrated to have high potential. The present research experimentally investigated the MnOx/Na2CO3 redox water splitting system both in an electric furnace and in a concentrated solar furnace at 775 and 825 °C, respectively, using 10 to 250 g of redox reactants. The characteristics of all reactants were determined by particle size distribution, porosity, XRD and SEM. With milled particle and grain sizes below 1 µm, the reactants offer a large surface area for the heterogeneous gas/solid reaction. Up to 10 complete cycles (oxidation/reduction) were assessed in the electric furnace. After 10 cycles, an equilibrium yield appeared to be reached. The milled Mn3O4/Na2CO3 cycle showed an efficiency of 78% at 825 °C. After 10 redox cycles, the efficiency was still close to 60%. At 775 °C, the milled MnO/Na2CO3 cycles showed an 80% conversion during cycle 1, which decreased to 77% after cycle 10. Other reactant compounds achieved a significantly lower conversion yield. In the solar furnace, the highest conversion (>95%) was obtained with the Mn3O4/Na2CO3 system at 775 °C. A final assessment of the process economics revealed that at least 30 to 40 cycles would be needed to produce H2 at the price of 4 €/kg H2. To meet competitive prices below 2 €/kg H2, over 80 cycles should be achieved. The experimental and economic results stress the importance of improving the reverse cycles of the redox system.

1. Introduction

1.1. The Need to Develop H2 Production

The global energy production is influenced by the growing shortage of traditional fossil fuels and the threat of disturbing the ecological balance due to climate change. Conferences like COP21 and COP26 set goals to reduce greenhouse gases such as CO2. These COPs proclaimed the leading role of renewable energy in solving climate problems. The wider use of hydrogen was advocated [1,2] through, e.g., hydrogen-enriched natural gas [3], the direct reduction of iron ore [4], the use of hydrogen in the minerals’ processing [5], and the production of CO2-based synthetic natural gas [6], among others. It is important to assess the ways that hydrogen production can help to meet the renewable energy goals.
Since there are no significant resources of hydrogen on earth, hydrogen is referred to as a secondary energy carrier, made from a primary energy source (nowadays, ~95% from fossil fuels) [1,3]. The global transition to hydrogen as an energy carrier accompanies the rise in required “green” energy.
In 2020, the annual production of hydrocarbons reached 14 billion tons of oil-equivalent [7]. To affect the global CO2 emissions, at least 10% of hydrocarbons should be replaced by renewable energy resources and/or by hydrogen. If considering hydrogen as a major potential renewable energy carrier, roughly 1 billion tons of H2 produced from non-fossil sources are required to accomplish this. In 2020, only 87 million tons of hydrogen were produced worldwide [8], mainly used in ammonia production and oil refining. This is more than 10 times below the required quantity to replace 10% of hydrocarbons.
The main method currently considered in producing green hydrogen is electrolysis using electricity from renewable sources (wind turbines, photovoltaics). It theoretically takes about 50 kWh to produce electrolysis H2 at an overestimated efficiency of 80% [1], without taking other losses into account. The annual global energy production from renewable sources (excluding hydro-energy) was estimated to be 2800 TWh in 2019, which would translate into 56 million tons of H2 annually, if these sources were solely used to produce H2. This is lower than the current hydrogen production. In addition, the production cost of the renewable-based H2 is two to four times higher than when using traditional petrochemical pathways, and it is not deemed practical to expand these renewable technologies to meet the goal of 1 billion tons of H2 [7].
The global electricity production of hydropower in 2019 was around 38 Exajoules (104 GWh) [9], which allows an annual production of 200 million tons of H2 if no electricity is sent to the power grid, which is only three times the current production. Since hydropower is already realized for over 20% of its potential, it is therefore unable to solve the problem [9]. The same reason applies to nuclear energy, where the energy production is only 25 Exajoules (even less than hydropower). With the often negative public attitude towards nuclear energy and the limited reserves of Uranium, nuclear power will not sustain a future for hydrogen production.
According to the arguments above, fossil hydrocarbons are deemed to remain a valid source for hydrogen production in the near future. However, the production of hydrogen with Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) results in the emission of 10 kg CO2/kg H2, and such hydrogen is classified as “gray hydrogen” according to ecological standards [1]. It is environmentally unattractive and does not contribute to the reduction of CO2 emissions. An additional process to make this technology “cleaner” is carbon capture and storage (CCS). The major disadvantage of this process is that the total cost rises because the process requires more energy. CCS would not be sufficient to have an environmental impact. With the rise of the hydrogen cost to almost the double, it is not a viable solution [10].
It is hence important to develop novel green H2 production methods, as reviewed and studied by the authors [1,3,11]. Among these methods, thermo-chemical water splitting by redox systems [12] could be considered to have significant potential and thus is the subject of the present research.

1.2. Hydrogen Production by Water Splitting in Thermal Redox Systems

An earlier paper by the authors [12] assessed and classified different thermo-chemical water splitting redox reactions. A redox system ranking was developed by applying multiple assessment criteria, including energy efficiency, H2 yield, conversion, cyclic operation, production cost, and environmental and safety impacts.
Several very high temperature reactions (≥1000 °C) were not taken into consideration, e.g., involving. metal–metal oxides/hydroxides, perovskites, or doped ceria. At such high temperatures, concentrated solar energy would be the potential heat source, but at the expense of having to use extravagant construction materials for the solar receiver-reactor. Selected systems should operate at lower temperatures, preferably below 1000 °C for the reactor wall temperature. Deng et al. [12] finally selected 4 out of 24 redox reactions that meet the systems’ selection priorities. These systems included Mn3O4/MnO/NaMnO2, MnFe2O4, U3O8/UO2CO3 and ZnO/Fe3O4/ZnFe2O4 redox reactions. The U3O8 system was discarded for nuclear hazard reasons, and the ZnO system scored 30% lower than both other redox reactions and was hence eliminated from a priority investigation. Both the MnFe2O4 and Mn3O4/MnO/NaMnO2 redox processes are of a multi-step nature, where water is decomposed into H2 and O2 via a medium-temperature two-step (MnFe2O4) or a medium-temperature four-step process (Mn3O4), respectively, that forms a closed cycle [12]. This process was previously fostered as having a high potential [13] and involves four reaction steps, as shown below.

1.3. Literature Findings on MnOx/Na2CO3 Cycle

Xu et al. [13] comprehensively studied the Mn3O4/MnO/Na2CO3 system. Theoretical considerations were validated by experiments on a small scale (200 mg) in a thermogravimetric analyzer. The Mn-based reduction and oxidation reactions required an operating temperature in excess of 850 °C. This four-step redox cycle is given by the equations below.
3 Na 2 CO 3   ( s ) + 2 Mn 3 O 4 ( s ) 4 NaMnO 2 ( s ) + 2 CO 2 ( g ) + 2 MnO ( s ) + Na 2 CO 3   ( s )
2 MnO ( s ) + Na 2 CO 3   ( s ) + H 2 O ( v ) H 2 ( g ) + CO 2 ( g ) + 2 NaMnO 2 ( s )
6 NaMnO 2 ( s ) + ayH 2 O ( v ) + ( 3 + b ) CO 2 ( g ) 3 Na 2 CO 3   ( s ) + aH x MnO 2 · yH 2 O ( s ) + bMnCO 3   ( s ) + cMn 3 O 4 ( s )
aH x MnO 2 · yH 2 O ( s ) + bMnCO 3   ( s ) ( 2 c ) Mn 3 O 4 ( s ) + ayH 2 O ( v ) + bCO 2 ( g ) + 0.5 O 2 ( g )
The results of Xu et al. [13] exhibited a more than 90% yield for both the H2 and O2 evolution for five successive redox cycles. The key recyclability feature of the Mn-based system was demonstrated to be the complete in/out shuttling of Na+ of the manganese oxides, where the reactions to form α-NaMnO2 are thermodynamically favorable. It was demonstrated that the Na+ extraction is enhanced by the mobility of Na+ in the layered structure when intercalated by water and is promoted by CO2, thus driving the reaction equilibrium to a mixture of Mn3O4, and MnCO3. After thermal reduction at 850 °C, Mn3O4 is formed, and this closes the thermo-chemical cycle.
The cycles consist of multiple stages, operating from 50 °C to 850 °C [13,14]. Dissolved Na2CO3 must be recovered from the aqueous solution before the needed re-heating to 850 °C, and it will impose a considerable energy cost. The wide range of the temperatures in the different steps requires adequate heat management and makes the process more complex.
The possible loss of volatile Na species at high temperature can be responsible for the progressive loss of process cyclability [15]. The hydrolysis reaction, however, drives the formation of Na-birnessite. Bayón et al. demonstrated that the surface area of Mn3O4 is the main factor, while the crystalline domain size has a secondary influence [16]. Xu et al. [17] performed the multistep reactions on 200 mg Mn3O4/Na2CO3 below 850 °C and demonstrated that the rates of H2 releasing and Na+ extraction depend on the redox properties of metals in ferrite-based oxides and the facility of intercalating alkali cations. Bayón et al. [14] also studied the feasibility of the MnO/Na2CO3 cycle, with a maximum conversion of 47% and a productivity of 20.1 μmol H2 min−1 g−1. Alonso et al. [18] studied the Mn2O3/Mn3O4/MnO cycles at >1835 K using solar-driven thermogravimetry and derived the overall kinetic rate equations.

1.4. Objectives of the Research

Studies related to thermo-chemical water splitting have largely been limited to individual steps of the cycles and their kinetics analysis. Experiments were mostly performed on gram scale. This kind of research typically shows limitations in cyclability assessment, realistic energy conversion, and operation complexity due to the small size of the experiments used. The present study aims to demonstrate the water splitting processes on a larger scale, using both an electrical and a concentrated solar reactor to examine the proposed systems under realistic operation conditions. The selected redox pair was the MnOx/Na2CO3 cycle, based on previous studies [12]. It is expected that the result will give evidence of the thermochemical hydrogen-releasing approaches by water splitting, without complex microstructures and reactor design. In an attempt to reduce the reaction temperatures, the operating conditions were reduced from 850 °C [13] to between 775 °C and 825 °C, while avoiding the 50 °C condensation step [13] of reaction (3), and step (3) was operated at 140 °C, as suggested by Rao et al. [19]. These reactions were moreover performed at a 10 to 250 g scale, instead of using small-scale (200 mg) thermogravimetry as applied by Xu et al. [13]. It will also clarify the efforts required to transform the small-scale test results into industrial implementation in a renewable energy field.

2. Materials and Methods

The priority redox systems under scrutiny involve the Mn3O4/MnO/Na2CO3 cycles, as described before.

2.1. Precursor Materials and Characteristics

The characteristics of all precursor materials used are given in Table 1. Solid mixed particles were prepared.
The α-Al2O3 and olivine were used as inert filler materials to form a porous fixed bed in the electric furnace experiment or a fluidizable bed (in the solar rig) and to enhance the heat transfer. The list of facilities, including parts of the experimental set-up, is summarized in Table 2.
Particle sizes were measured by Malvern laser diffraction and confirmed by SEM-imaging. Particle sizes of precursors and inert fillers are given in Table 3. The olivine particles used in the experiments were crushed spherical magnesium iron silicates with corresponding values of Waddell sphericity factor ψ of 0.8–0.9 [20]. When dealing with powders, a fundamental knowledge of their physical parameters is indispensable, with different methods and approaches proposed in the literature. The results obtained differ widely, and it is important to define the standards to be applied, both towards the methods of investigation and the interpretation of experimental results [21]. First, describing the size of a particle is not as straightforward as one might suspect. Factors of non-sphericity and size distributions make it impossible to put “size” in just one number. Whereas sieving can be used for coarser particles of a size in excess of about 50 μm, instrumental techniques span a wide size range. For fine particles, the occurrence of cohesive forces needs to be overcome, and dispersants and sample mixing need to be applied. Secondly, the shape of the particles is examined. By defining sphericity, irregularly shaped particles are described. Finally, the density of particles and of particle assemblies and their voidage (volume fraction of voids) need to be defined. The particle size distributions of the feedstock commercial materials are mostly Gaussian, with a fairly narrow particle size distribution, as illustrated in Figure 1.
The final ψ value was chosen between 0.84 and 0.85. While Mn3O4, MnO and Na2CO3 are common salts, the corresponding ψ value is 0.84. The particle size and distribution are given by the Malvern particle size test, where dV is the volume average particle size (μm). The surface-volume particle diameter, dsV, is calculated as
d sv = Ψ   d v
For the pulverized mixtures, the grain size is a lot smaller and is better determined from SEM imaging, as shown in Figure 2. No obvious differences in the microscopic morphology of crushed Mn3O4 and MnO were detected. The particle size of Na2CO3 also becomes smaller after pulverization.
Clearly, by pulverization, the particle size is reduced to far below 2 μm, with smaller particles around 150 nm.

2.2. Synthesis of the Redox Reactants

Ball-milling [22] was used to prepare the reactants. In the present study, the synthesized MnOx/Na2CO3 mix was calcined at 700 °C in a fixed bed reactor for 1 h and in a N2 atmosphere. This calcination under N2 is required to “activate” the reactants before the first thermal reduction step. After calcination, the reactants were collected and XRD-analyzed toward their phase composition and their stability under N2 atmosphere. After the XRD analysis, reactants were used in the thermochemical water splitting reaction.
These XRD results are discussed in Section 3.2.

2.3. Experimental Set-Up

Isothermal experiments of the redox system were carried out in both an 8 kW electrically heated furnace (Figure 3) and in a 20 kWth solar-heated reactor (Figure 4). The H2 and CO2 productions were monitored. The operating temperature was set by a thermocouple inserted in the redox reactant’s bed.
Solar H2 production was performed in the solar thermal furnace of Figure 4, with both a heliostat and a parabolic mirror to concentrate the solar rays into the irradiation focus (0.3 m diameter) of the 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 m cavity. The maximum solar heat captured in the cavity was ~20 kWth, starting from about 30 kWth collected by the heliostat. Since cohesive sub-micron particles needed to be treated, a vibrating fluidized bed was installed inside the cavity. The solar rig during operations is shown in Figure 5. A 0.05 m internal vibrated fluidized bed reactor was used. The advantages of using solar concentrated as a heat source were recently highlighted in number of publications with respect of solar-to-power uses [23,24,25], solar-driven thermo-chemical reactions [4,25] and solar-driven physical applications [26,27,28].
Water/steam and N2 carrier gas were preheated in a coil heat exchanger within the cavity as illustrated at the right of the reactor in Figure 4. A 0.25 m deep bed was formed. About 250 g of the Mn3O4/Na2CO3 reactant particles were mixed with the same amount of olivine. A multi-orifice tubular distributor provided a uniform gas distribution at the bottom of the fluidized bed [29]. Table 4 lists the geometrical and operating parameters.
The accuracy of the measurements was 1 g for the weight, 0.05 cm/s for the superficial gas velocity, 0.1 °C for the temperature, and 0.1 Hz for the vibration frequency. The vibration frequency was adjusted by varying the motor inverter frequency, and up to 47.7 Hz could be reached. A fixed amplitude of 0.6 mm was used. The bed pressure drop from distributor to the top of the bed was continuously measured and recorded by a differential pressure transmitter (Rosemount Inc., Shakopee, MN, USA). Nitrogen was supplied using a separate mass flow controller. After the redox reactions and subsequent cooling, the products were collected for analysis.

2.4. Mn3O4/Na2CO3 Cycle

The redox reactants were prepared by milling and mixing of Na2CO3 and Mn3O4. Olivine or α-Al2O3 (100–150 mesh) was added to avoid sintering, and its dosage was half of the total mass of Mn3O4 and Na2CO3.
  • In a first step, the furnace was slowly heated to the required testing temperature (775 or 825 °C) under N2 flow. The outlet gas passed through saturated clarified lime water to capture evolved CO2. When a constant temperature was achieved in the testing section of the reactor, and when no CO2 exhaust was detected, water was injected by syringe pump and heated until reaching the steam temperature in the preheating section of the furnace and reactor. The high temperature steam reacted with the reactants, and the produced H2 was measured at the outlet by GC-MS. The column used was the TDX-01 packed column produced in Lanzhou Zhongke Antai Analysis Technology Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen, China). The outlet gas flow rate was measured by an electric flowmeter, and the real-time record was transmitted to the computer. A hydrogen alarm was placed at the outlet. The step was assumed to be nearly completed when the hydrogen concentration was lower than 0.1%.
  • The reduction step consisted of 2 subsequent reactions: firstly, a cooling to 140 °C (for about 5 h), followed by the reduction step using pure CO2 at 825 °C (step 4 of the reaction scheme). It was observed that steps 1 and 2 of the reaction scheme were started simultaneously, although the quantity of produced H2 remained very low (<0.1%).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Hydrogen Yield in the Electric Furnace

The behavior of the MnOx/Na2CO3 system was assessed for different reactant preparations, as illustrated in Table 5 below.
The time-dependent H2 production is illustrated in Figure 6 for milled MnO + Na2CO3. Other reactants showed a similar profile. The hydrogen generation progresses inversely proportional to the oxidation of the reactant. The yield is fast for the first 100 min, then slows down, to reach a final reactant-depletion yield after 300 min.
It should be remembered that the maximum H2 production is 0.5 mol/mol MnO. For all experiments, cumulative H2 production results were calculated and are presented in Table 6. It is clear that most of the H2 is produced within 250 min. The extra subsequent production is negligible.
Clearly, the particle size is very important, and milled reactants achieve a higher H2 yield than the non-milled commercial reactant mixes. After milling, the Mn3O4/Na2CO3 mix has an average particle size of 0.2 to 4 μm, whereas the MnO/Na2CO3 is more uniform around 1 μm. This difference is also reflected in the external surface area (BET), as measured by Micromeritics and Micrometrics at 297.0 and 498.9 m2/g, respectively. Both particle size and BET differences favor the MnO/Na2CO3 system. Since Na2CO3 needs to be recovered at 140 °C before reheating to 850 °C, this will impose a considerable energy cost. Due to the wide difference between the temperatures of the different steps, an adequate heat management needs to be applied, and this adds complexity to the process.
The cycle performance of commercial Mn3O4 and Na2CO3 needs to be further improved. For the milled MnO and Na2CO3 reacting at 775 °C, the H2 yield reaches 80.2%. The use of finer size reactants reduces the required reaction temperature and hence the cost of hydrogen production.

3.2. Morphology of the Mn3O4/MnO/Na2CO3 Reactants

Typical SEM images are presented in Figure 7.
Particles remain in the μm to sub-μm size range. Through regeneration (reduction), they appear to become more spherical. XRD analysis is generally used to identify the crystalline phase and crystal structures of minerals and their mixes. To index the XRD patterns of each component, the JCPDS numbers were used as follows: MnO (JCPDS 78-0424), NaMnO2 (JCPDS 25-0845), MnCO3 (JCPDS 85-1109), Na2CO3 (JCPDS 37-0451) and Mn3O4 (JCPDS 80-0382). The diffraction peaks of olivine were assigned to the Mg2SiO4 (JCPDS 80-0944) and Fe2SiO4 (JCPDS 87-0317) crystal planes, which are the main constituents of olivine. Only the corresponding olivine peaks are marked as yellow stars in Figure 8b–f, in order to distinguish olivine, reactants and products. Figure 8 illustrates the various XRD patterns and confirms that the reactants had conversions at varying degrees, except for Mn3O4 + Na2CO3, which did not complete the reaction at 775 °C. However, the crushed MnO + Na2CO3 can almost completely react at the same T, indicating that the small particle size and high BET reactants are more likely to react, thus reducing the reaction temperature, the heat loss, and the thermal cost of hydrogen production.

3.3. Solar H2 Production Using the Mn3O4/MnO/Na2CO3 System

The H2 production by the different MnOx/Na2CO3 reactants was repeated in the solar reactor. Temperatures of the outer reactor wall were limited to below ~1000 °C (strength limitation of the Incoloy construction material). Due to the inertia of the heliostat focusing, temperatures in the bed varied between about 760 and 790 °C (average 775 °C) and between 815 and 835 °C (average 825 °C). Mostly, the first H2 production cycle was investigated. For the cold mix Mn3O4/Na2CO3, the reactants after H2 production were regenerated for 6 h at an average 825 °C using pure CO2. Results are illustrated in Figure 9.
Again, it should be remembered that the maximum production yield is 0.5 mol H2/mol Mn-reactant. It is however clear that (i) the milled MnO/Na2CO3 reactant has a high production yield even at 775 °C; (ii) other reactants need to be operated at higher temperatures to achieve fair conversions; (iii) the cyclability of Mn3O4/Na2CO3 needs to be improved.

3.4. Cycling Performance

Although only a maximum of 10 redox cycles was experimentally assessed, the results clearly demonstrated the decreasing but stabilizing H2 production efficiency with the number of cycles. The four-step reverse reaction system of the Mn3O4/MnO system is complicated. If an overall H2 production efficiency of 60% is accepted for the multi-cycle operation, the number of required cycles, Nc, to break even can be determined. Thermal costs are not taken into consideration since the system needs to operate on renewable electricity (PV, wind) or on concentrated solar power. This implies a favorable ratio of the costs of the main reactants (€/ton) [12] and the economic value of the H2 generated, with a maximum target price of 4000 €/ton.
This is reflected in the following relationship:
N c = cos t   of   main   reactant   ( ) 4000   ( ) · wt   H 2   generated   per   unit   amount   of   main   reactant
Since 0.5 mol of H2 can maximally be produced per mole of main reactant, experiments determine the wt% of H2 generated per unit amount of reactant. Na2CO3 is by far cheaper than Mn3O4/MnO and is not taken into consideration. This results in an H2 generation at a 62% reversibility of around 0.31 wt%. With a main average reactant cost of 400 €/ton, the number of cycles to break even amounts to between 30 and 40 cycles. This needs be proven in subsequent experiments.
It should moreover be reminded that extra reactant and thermal operation costs should be added, but a good product and heat management should reduce these to a minimum. The loss of reactant from the fluidized bed was minimum due to the use of metal-fiber filters at the exit of the reactor [30]. CO2 should be separated and used in the reverse reaction. Although zeolites and activated carbon could be used after cooling the reactor gases [31,32,33], this will again increase the heating costs. It is hence proposed to use carbonation/decarbonation reactions [32] operated in series and in parallel with the main oxidation (H2 producing) and reduction (O2 producing) steps.
It is moreover evident that the water splitting reactions should preferably be solar-driven or electrically heated from renewable electricity sources (wind, photovoltaics). These energy balance considerations are currently being assessed.

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

Thermal water splitting by redox reactants could contribute to a hydrogen-based energy economy. The previously selected redox water splitting cycle (Mn3O4/MnO/NaMnO2) was applied in isothermal conversions (electric furnace and concentrate solar reactor). Both redox water splitting systems were experimentally investigated. XRD, SEM and size distribution measurement confirm that sub-micron nano-scale reactants have a higher H2 yield than the micron-scale ones. Up to 10 complete cycles (oxidation/reduction) were assessed. The Mn3O4/MnO/Na2CO3 cycle achieved hydrogen production efficiencies of 78% in an electric furnace at 825 °C. The milled Mn3O4/Na2CO3 cycle achieved over 80% efficiency in the first cycle, and over 77% in the tenth cycle. In the solar furnace, the highest conversion (>95%) was obtained with the Mn3O4/Na2CO3 system at 775 °C. The economic assessments revealed that at least 100 cycles would be needed to achieve competitive H2 prices below 2 €/kg for systems with a cheap energy supply, provided CO2 could be separated from the reactant gas and reused in the reverse reaction. The experimental and economic results recommend a further improvement of the reverse cycles of the redox systems.

Author Contributions

The conceptualization of the research was performed by J.L., R.D. and J.B. The methodology was set by M.V. and S.L. All authors participated in the validation and original draft preparation. Y.D. and J.B. were co-responsible for the writing—review and editing. J.B. was responsible for the funding acquisition and project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by National Key Research and Development Project (No. 2018YFE0107400) from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China and by Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering of Beijing University of Chemical Technology.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, S.; Kang, Q.; Baeyens, J.; Zhang, H.L.; Deng, Y.M. Hydrogen Production: State of Technology. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Proceedings of the 2020 10th International Conference on Environment Science and Engineering (ICESE 2020) Vienna, Austria, 18–21 May 2020; IOP Publishing Ltd.: Bristol, UK, 2020; Volume 544, p. 012011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Abdin, Z.; Zafaranloo, A.; Rafiee, A.; Mérida, W.; Lipiński, W.; Khalilpour, K.R. Hydrogen as an energy vector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 120, 109620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Deng, Y.; Dewil, R.; Appels, L.; Van Tulden, F.; Li, S.; Yang, M.; Baeyens, J. Hydrogen-enriched natural gas in a decarbonization perspective. Fuel 2022, 318, 123680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, S.; Zhang, H.; Nie, J.; Dewil, R.; Baeyens, J.; Deng, Y. The Direct Reduction of Iron Ore with Hydrogen. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. El-Emam, R.S.; Gabriel, K.S. Synergizing hydrogen and cement industries for Canada’s climate plan—Case study. Energy Sources, Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 2021, 43, 3151–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ipsakis, D.; Varvoutis, G.; Lampropoulos, A.; Papaefthimiou, S.; Marnellos, G.E.; Konsolakis, M. Τechno-economic assessment of industrially-captured CO2 upgrade to synthetic natural gas by means of renewable hydrogen. Renew. Energy 2021, 179, 1884–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dudley, B. Statistical Review of World Energy; BP Statistical Review: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  8. Antweiler, W. What Role Does Hydrogen Have in the Future of Electric Mobility? Available online: https://wernerantweiler.ca/blog.php?item=2020-09-28 (accessed on 25 May 2022).
  9. BP, p.l.c. Hydroelectricity. Available online: https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/hydroelectricity.html (accessed on 25 May 2022).
  10. Chao, C.; Deng, Y.; Dewil, R.; Baeyens, J.; Fan, X. Post-combustion carbon capture. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 138, 110490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Dewil, R.; Deng, Y.; Li, S. Co-Al and Mn-Fe Catalytic Steam Reforming of CH3OH to H2. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Environment Science and Engineering (ICESE 2021) Vienna, Austria, 9–12 September 2021; IOP Publishing Ltd.: Bristol, UK, 2022; Volume 952, p. 012007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Deng, Y.; Dewil, R.; Appels, L.; Li, S.; Baeyens, J.; Degrève, J.; Wang, G. Thermo-chemical water splitting: Selection of priority reversible redox reactions by multi-attribute decision making. Renew. Energy 2021, 170, 800–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, B.; Bhawe, Y.; Davis, M.E. Low-temperature, manganese oxide-based, thermochemical water splitting cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 9260–9264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bayón, A.; de la Peña O’Shea, V.A.; Serrano, D.P.; Coronado, J.M. Exploring the alternative MnO-Na2CO3 thermochemical cycle for water splitting. J. CO2 Util. 2020, 42, 101264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kreider, P.B.; Funke, H.H.; Cuche, K.; Schmidt, M.; Steinfeld, A.; Weimer, A.W. Manganese oxide based thermochemical hydrogen production cycle. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 7028–7037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bayón, A.; de la Peña O’Shea, V.A.; Coronado, J.M.; Serrano, D.P. Role of the physicochemical properties of hausmannite on the hydrogen production via the Mn3O4–NaOH thermochemical cycle. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, B.; Bhawe, Y.; Davis, M.E. Spinel Metal Oxide-Alkali Carbonate-Based, Low-Temperature Thermochemical Cycles for Water Splitting and CO2 Reduction. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 1564–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Alonso, E.; Hutter, C.; Romero, M.; Steinfeld, A.; Gonzalez-Aguilar, J. Kinetics of Mn2O3 –Mn3O4 and Mn3O4–MnO Redox Reactions Performed under Concentrated Thermal Radiative Flux. Energy Fuels 2013, 27, 4884–4890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rao, C.N.R.; Dey, S. Solar thermochemical splitting of water to generate hydrogen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 13385–13393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mottana, A.; Crespi, R.; Liborio, G. Simon & Schuster’s Guide to Rocks and Minerals; Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, USA, 1991; ISBN 0671244175. [Google Scholar]
  21. Deng, Y.; Dewil, R.; Appels, L.; Zhang, H.; Li, S.; Baeyens, J. The Need to Accurately Define and Measure the Properties of Particles. Standards 2021, 1, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Murmura, M.A.; Varsano, F.; Padella, F.; La Barbera, A.; Alvani, C.; Annesini, M.C. Hydrogen Production by the Sodium Manganese Ferrite Thermochemical Cycle—Experimental Rate and Modeling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 10310–10317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Deng, Y.; Sabatier, F.; Dewil, R.; Flamant, G.; Le Gal, A.; Gueguen, R.; Baeyens, J.; Li, S.; Ansart, R. Dense upflow fluidized bed (DUFB) solar receivers of high aspect ratio: Different fluidization modes through inserting bubble rupture promoters. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 418, 129376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huili, Z.; Jan, B.; Shuo, L.; Raf, D.; Yimin, D. Power Generation upon Demand by Using Thermal Energy Storage in Concentrated Solar Power Plants: Recent Developments. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2021 5th International Conference on Power and Energy Engineering (ICPEE), Xiamen, China, 2–4 December 2021; pp. 96–102. [Google Scholar]
  25. Baeyens, J.; Zhang, H.; Kong, W.; Dumont, P.; Flamant, G. Solar thermal treatment of non-metallic minerals: The potential application of the SOLPART technology. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2126, 180002. [Google Scholar]
  26. Capossio, J.P.; Fabani, M.P.; Reyes-Urrutia, A.; Torres-Sciancalepore, R.; Deng, Y.; Baeyens, J.; Rodriguez, R.; Mazza, G. Sustainable Solar Drying of Brewer’s Spent Grains: A Comparison with Conventional Electric Convective Drying. Processes 2022, 10, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kang, Q.; Flamant, G.; Dewil, R.; Baeyens, J.; Zhang, H.L.; Deng, Y.M. Particles in a circulation loop for solar energy capture and storage. Particuology 2019, 43, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, J.; Baeyens, J.; Deng, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H. High temperature Mn2O3/Mn3O4 and Co3O4/CoO systems for thermo-chemical energy storage. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Geldart, D.; Baeyens, J. The design of distributors for gas-fluidized beds. Powder Technol. 1985, 42, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, S.; Baeyens, J.; Dewil, R.; Appels, L.; Zhang, H.; Deng, Y. Advances in rigid porous high temperature filters. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 139, 110713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Deng, Y.; Seville, J.P.K.; Bell, S.D.; Ingram, A.; Zhang, H.; Sweygers, N.; Dewil, R.; Baeyens, J.; Appels, L. Reviewing Fundamental CO2 Adsorption Characteristics of Zeolite and Activated Carbon by In-situ Measurements With Radioactively Labelled CO2. Sep. Purif. Rev. 2021, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, J.; Baeyens, J.; Deng, Y.; Tan, T.; Zhang, H. The chemical CO2 capture by carbonation-decarbonation cycles. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 260, 110054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Seville, J.P.K.; Deng, Y.; Dawn Bell, S.; Dewil, R.; Appels, L.; Ansart, R.; Leadbeater, T.; Parker, D.; Zhang, H.; Ingram, A.; et al. 11CO2 positron emission imaging reveals the in-situ gas concentration profile as function of time and position in opaque gas-solid contacting systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 404, 126507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PSD of (a) commercial Mn3O4; (b) commercial Na2CO3; (c) commercial MnO; (d) pretreated olivine.
Figure 1. PSD of (a) commercial Mn3O4; (b) commercial Na2CO3; (c) commercial MnO; (d) pretreated olivine.
Sustainability 14 07597 g001
Figure 2. SEM-imaging of (a) commercial Mn3O4; (b) commercial Na2CO3; (c) commercial MnO; (d) pulverized Mn3O4; (e) pulverized Na2CO3; (f) pulverized MnO.
Figure 2. SEM-imaging of (a) commercial Mn3O4; (b) commercial Na2CO3; (c) commercial MnO; (d) pulverized Mn3O4; (e) pulverized Na2CO3; (f) pulverized MnO.
Sustainability 14 07597 g002
Figure 3. (a) Experimental set-up; (b) detailed construction of the reactor; (c) dimensions.
Figure 3. (a) Experimental set-up; (b) detailed construction of the reactor; (c) dimensions.
Sustainability 14 07597 g003
Figure 4. Solar receiver test unit (reactor and preheater installed in the cavity).
Figure 4. Solar receiver test unit (reactor and preheater installed in the cavity).
Sustainability 14 07597 g004
Figure 5. Photograph of the solar furnace.
Figure 5. Photograph of the solar furnace.
Sustainability 14 07597 g005
Figure 6. Hydrogen concentration varies with reaction time at 775 °C using milled MnO and Na2CO3.
Figure 6. Hydrogen concentration varies with reaction time at 775 °C using milled MnO and Na2CO3.
Sustainability 14 07597 g006
Figure 7. SEM imaging of samples after reactions: (a) after 2 cyclic reactions, commercial Mn3O4 and Na2CO3 at 825 °C; (b) after reaction step 1 and 2, commercial Mn3O4 and Na2CO3 at 825 °C; (c) after reaction step 1 and step 2 for pulverized Mn3O4 and Na2CO3 at 825 °C; (d) after reaction step 1 and step 2 for commercial Mn3O4 and Na2CO3 at 775 °C; (e) after reaction step 1 and step 2 for pulverized Mn3O4 and Na2CO3 at 775 °C; (f) after step 2 of the reaction of pulverized MnO and Na2CO3 at 775 °C.
Figure 7. SEM imaging of samples after reactions: (a) after 2 cyclic reactions, commercial Mn3O4 and Na2CO3 at 825 °C; (b) after reaction step 1 and 2, commercial Mn3O4 and Na2CO3 at 825 °C; (c) after reaction step 1 and step 2 for pulverized Mn3O4 and Na2CO3 at 825 °C; (d) after reaction step 1 and step 2 for commercial Mn3O4 and Na2CO3 at 775 °C; (e) after reaction step 1 and step 2 for pulverized Mn3O4 and Na2CO3 at 775 °C; (f) after step 2 of the reaction of pulverized MnO and Na2CO3 at 775 °C.
Sustainability 14 07597 g007
Figure 8. XRD results of pretreated olivine, and samples after reactions: (a) pretreated olivine; (b) samples after 2 cyclic reactions of commercial Mn3O4 and Na2CO3 at 825 °C; (c) samples after reaction steps 1 and 2 for pulverized Mn3O4 + Na2CO3 at 825 °C; (d) samples after reaction steps 1 and 2 for commercial Mn3O4 + Na2CO3 at 775 °C; (e) samples after reactions steps 1 and 2 for pulverized Mn3O4 + Na2CO3 at 775 °C; (f) samples after step 2 of the reaction of pulverized MnO + Na2CO3 at 775 °C.
Figure 8. XRD results of pretreated olivine, and samples after reactions: (a) pretreated olivine; (b) samples after 2 cyclic reactions of commercial Mn3O4 and Na2CO3 at 825 °C; (c) samples after reaction steps 1 and 2 for pulverized Mn3O4 + Na2CO3 at 825 °C; (d) samples after reaction steps 1 and 2 for commercial Mn3O4 + Na2CO3 at 775 °C; (e) samples after reactions steps 1 and 2 for pulverized Mn3O4 + Na2CO3 at 775 °C; (f) samples after step 2 of the reaction of pulverized MnO + Na2CO3 at 775 °C.
Sustainability 14 07597 g008
Figure 9. Solar H2 production using the MnOx/Na2CO3 cycle.
Figure 9. Solar H2 production using the MnOx/Na2CO3 cycle.
Sustainability 14 07597 g009
Table 1. Reactants used.
Table 1. Reactants used.
ReactantChemical FormulaSupplierPurity (%)
Sodium carbonateNa2CO3Lushi Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China)≥99.9
Manganese (II) carbonateMnCO3Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH (St. Louis, MO, USA)≥99.9
Manganese (II–III) oxideMn3O4Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH≥99
Manganese (II) oxideMnOSigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH≥99
Table 2. Experimental and analytical facilities.
Table 2. Experimental and analytical facilities.
NamesModelsManufacturer
Syringe water pumpLSP02-1BLongerPump (Hebei, China)
Electronic balanceME403/02Mettler Toledo (Shanghai, China)
Multifunctional crusher800YYongkang Boou Hardware Products Co. (Zhejiang, China)
Tubular furnace reactorCustomizedZSHIELD Inc. (Cupertino, CA, USA)
Particle size distributionMastersizer 2000Malvern panalytical (Malvern, UK)
GC-MSHAS-301-1474DECRA (Berlin, Germany)
XRDRINT2000RIGAKU (Tokyo, Japan)
SEMJSM-7800FJEOL (Tokyo, Japan)
BETASAP 2020Micromeritics (Norcross, GA, USA)
Table 3. Average volume diameter (dV) and surface/volume diameter (dSV) of the feedstock particles used.
Table 3. Average volume diameter (dV) and surface/volume diameter (dSV) of the feedstock particles used.
Chemicalsdv (μm)dsv (μm)ψ
Mn3O415.1212.700.84
Na2CO3394.45331.340.84
MnO10.949.190.84
α-Al2O360.456.950.85
Olivine (100–150 mesh)167.85142.670.84
Table 4. Experimental conditions.
Table 4. Experimental conditions.
Bed HeightFluidizing
Carrier Gas
Reaction TSuperficial Gas
Velocity (cm/s)
Vibration FrequencyVibration AmplitudeVibration Direction
0.25 mN2775–825 °C<2<50 Hz0.6 mmVertical
Table 5. Experimental conditions.
Table 5. Experimental conditions.
ReactantsT (°C)N2 Flow Rate (L/min, 20 °C)
1Mn3O4 + Na2CO38250.5
2Milled Mn3O4 + Na2CO38250.5
3Mn3O4 + Na2CO37750.5
4Milled Mn3O4 + Na2CO37750.5
5Milled MnO + Na2CO37750.5
Table 6. Experimental results for hydrogen yields obtained in the electric furnace (average value with standard deviation of ±0.1%).
Table 6. Experimental results for hydrogen yields obtained in the electric furnace (average value with standard deviation of ±0.1%).
ReactantsT (°C)N2 Flow Rate (L/min, 20 °C)H2 yield
Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 5Cycle 10
1Mn3O4 + Na2CO38250.572.3%67.9%68.2%54.0%
2Milled Mn3O4 + Na2CO38250.578.3%-71.6%60.4%
3Mn3O4 + Na2CO37750.5Very lowNot further studied
4Milled Mn3O4 + Na2CO37750.556.4%Not further studied
5Milled MnO + Na2CO37750.580.2%-77.4%61.9%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, J.; Li, S.; Dewil, R.; Vanierschot, M.; Baeyens, J.; Deng, Y. Water Splitting by MnOx/Na2CO3 Reversible Redox Reactions. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7597. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137597

AMA Style

Liu J, Li S, Dewil R, Vanierschot M, Baeyens J, Deng Y. Water Splitting by MnOx/Na2CO3 Reversible Redox Reactions. Sustainability. 2022; 14(13):7597. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137597

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Jia, Shuo Li, Raf Dewil, Maarten Vanierschot, Jan Baeyens, and Yimin Deng. 2022. "Water Splitting by MnOx/Na2CO3 Reversible Redox Reactions" Sustainability 14, no. 13: 7597. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137597

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop