Next Article in Journal
Novel ICT System for Recycling and Eco-Shopping
Previous Article in Journal
Interpersonal Factors Affecting Adolescents’ Career Exploration in PAKISTAN
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 14
Issue 13
10.3390/su14137669
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Managing Phosphorus Availability from Organic and Inorganic Sources for Optimum Wheat Production in Calcareous Soils

by
Manzoor Ahmad
1,
Muhammad Ishaq
1,
Wajid Ali Shah
1,
Muhammad Adnan
2,*,
Shah Fahad
3,4,*,
Muhammad Hamzah Saleem
5,*,
Fahim Ullah Khan
6,
Maria Mussarat
7,
Shadman Khan
7,
Baber Ali
8,
Yasser S. Mostafa
9,
Saad Alamri
9 and
Mohamed Hashem
9,10
1
Department of Agriculture, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda 24420, Pakistan
2
Department of Agriculture, University of Swabi, Ambar, Swabi 23561, Pakistan
3
Hainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresource, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
4
Department of Agronomy, The University of Haripur, Haripur 22620, Pakistan
5
MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
6
Department of Agriculture, Hazara University, Mansehra 21300, Pakistan
7
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
8
Department of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
9
Department of Biology, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
10
Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut 71516, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(13), 7669; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137669
Submission received: 10 May 2022 / Revised: 14 June 2022 / Accepted: 16 June 2022 / Published: 23 June 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In calcareous soils, wheat productivity is much lower due to improper nutrient management, especially phosphorus (P). Therefore, this study was conducted to manage P availability from various organic (Control, FYM and Sugar cane straw applied at the rate of 10 ton ha−1) and inorganic (Control, 100% rock phosphate (RP), 50% acidulated RP, 100% acidulated RP, single super phosphate (SSP) and diammonium phosphate (DAP)) sources applied at the rate of 90 kg P2O5 ha−1 in calcareous soil while using wheat as test crop. When averaged across the organic sources, SSP performed better in emergence m−2 (126), tillers m−2 (431), spikes m−2 (419), grains spikes−1 (61), plant height (95.1 cm), 1000-GW (40 g), biological yield (11,023 kg ha−1), grain yield (4022 kg ha−1), phosphorus use efficiency (10.5%), phosphorus in leaves at tillering (2.63 mg kg−1) and anthesis stage (2.50 mg kg−1), soil P at heading (1.73 mg kg−1) and post-harvest stage (1.56 mg kg−1) compared to the rest of the mineral sources. Similarly, among the organic sources, FYM performed better than others for all tested traits. Integration of inorganic P sources with organic manures further improved crop performance and post-harvest soil P content. Therefore, using 10 tons FYM ha−1 in integration to SSP or 100% acidulated RP at the rate of 90 kg P2O5 ha−1 is recommended for ensuring optimum wheat productivity under calcareous soils.

1. Introduction

Phosphorus is a very important and integral part of many enzymes such as ATPs, DNA, RNA and protein, which play a key role in energy transformation and biochemical reactions [1]. It hastens crop maturity and stimulates early growth and root development [2]. However, it is the second limiting nutrient, after nitrogen, in the world of agriculture crop management [3] due to high chemical bonding with soil colloidal surfaces [4]. The conversions of phosphorus through mineralization and immobilization processes alter the availability of P in topsoil and affect its supply to plants. According to different crop scientists, the average recovery of phosphorus from phosphate fertilizer is less than 45 percent in the first year of application [5]. It makes numerous kinds of fixations with others elements such as aluminum, iron and calcium and converts into an insoluble P compound [6], depending upon the soil pH.
About 80–95% of agricultural land in Pakistan is low in organic matter (<1%) and deficient in phosphorus, thus it needs P fertilizers for better crop production [7]. Additionally, the P applied to such soils becomes unavailable to the plant roots due to precipitation reactions with Ca+2 and Mg+2 due to the soils’ calcareous nature. Rock phosphate (RP) might be used as a substitute for expensive synthetic P fertilizer to reduce the economic cost of fertilizers in farming for poor farmers who cannot afford commercially available P fertilizers [8]. However, its solubility is low in alkaline soil [9]. Acidulation of phosphorus rock could be a good strategy for enhancing its effectiveness in calcareous soils [9]. Organic sources such as farmyard manure and crop residue supply essential nutrients and improve soil health for better production [7], but it is not enough for fulfilling the nutritional requirements of high-yielding crops. Application of organic materials into the soil may also reduce P loss from the applied P fertilizers by preventing its runoff and leaching, thereby reducing the risk of water contamination [10].
Integrated application of organic and inorganic sources not only maintains P availability but also prevents its hazardous effects on the environment [11]. Wheat provides more protein than other crops; however, global challenges make it difficult to maintain its quantitative and qualitative production [12]. Although the total quantity of (P) in our soil may be high, it still does not fulfill crop nutritional requirements, because more than 80 percent of P is immobile in the soil and is unavailable to plants due to ionization, precipitation and immobilization [7]. Intensive cropping systems will meet the food requirements of the increasing population but they need or require more input in the form of different nutrients or energy, and therefore are responsible for environmental risks, and this also can be very costly [8]. Keeping in view crop phosphorus requirements and its availability in calcareous soil, this study was conducted to manage phosphorus availability by the integration of various organic and inorganic sources for optimum wheat production in calcareous soils under semi-arid climatic conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site and Timing

A field experiment was conducted at Bacha Khan Agriculture Research Farm (BARF), Bacha Khan University, Charsadda (34.0704732, 72.3902938) Pakistan. The soil of the experimental site was alkaline (7.74), non-saline (0.22 dS m−1) and calcareous (14.4%) in nature. The organic matter content (0.69%) and AB-DTPA extractable P (1.30 mg kg−1) were low in the soil.

2.2. Experimental Material

The rock phosphate (RP) containing 28% P was obtained from the Hazara rock phosphate source and its acidulation was carried out by mixing 1 kg RP with 0.6 L water and 0.5 L H2SO4 for 100% acidulation. The FYM was obtained from a local dairy farm, while the sugar cane straw was obtained from a nearby field.

2.3. Experimentation

The research consisted of two factors including inorganic sources of phosphorus (Control, RPalone, 50% acidulated RP, 100% acidulated RP, SSP and DAP each applied at the rate of 90 kg P2O5 ha−1) and organic amendments (control, FYM and sugar cane straw each applied at the rate of 10 ton ha−1). Randomized Complete Block design (RCBD) with a split-plot layout having 3 replications was used, while inorganic sources were assigned to the main and organic sources to subplots. The Pirsabak-2013 variety of wheat was used as a trial crop. The recommended dose of nitrogen (split in two; half at sowing and half at tillering stage) and potassium was applied at the rate of 120 and 60 kg ha−1 as urea and sulfate of potash (SOP), respectively. All other agronomic and cultural activities recommended for field experiments were equally maintained throughout the trail.

2.4. Laboratory Analyses

Soil pH and EC were measured by adopting the protocol described by [13,14], respectively. The soil samples were also analyzed for texture [15], lime [16] and AB-DTPA extractable P [17] at the heading and post-harvest stages. The collected plant samples were cleaned with distilled water and dried in oven at 60–70 °C for 48 h. After air drying, the samples were ground and stored in glass bottles. Phosphorus content in leaves was measured at tillering and anthesis stage by lambda, using the wet digestion technique [18]. Phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) was measured by the following formula:
PUE   ( % ) = ( T o t a l   p   u p t a k e   k g   h a ¯ 1   f e r t i l i z e d   p l o t ) − ( T o t a l   p   u p t a k e   k g   h a ¯ 1 i n   c o n t r o l   p l o t )   T o t a l   a p p l i e d   P   k g   h a ¯ 1

2.5. Agronomic Data Collection

Spikes were counted in 4 central rows of every subplot and then changed into spikes m−2. For recording data on grains spike−1, ten spikes were selected randomly in each subplot threshed separately, and the number of grains of each spike was counted and then averaged. Plant height was measured by averaging the height of ten randomly selected plants from plant base to spike tip in each sub-plot. A total of 1000 grains weight was noted by weighing a thousand grains taken randomly from the grain lot of every subplot. The biological yield was collected by harvesting central 4 rows from each sub-plot, drying the air, weighing and then changing to kg ha−1. For data concerning the grain yield, the harvested four-central rows in every sub-plot were threshed, cleaned, weighed and changed into kg ha−1.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The replicated data were run for analysis of variance (ANOVA) as appropriate for split-plot RCBD using statistical package Statistix8.1. The data were further subjected to the least significant difference (LSD) test at α = 0.05 where the F test was found significant [19].

3. Results

3.1. Spike m−2, Grains Spike−1 and Plant Height (cm) of Wheat

Data evidenced a considerable effect of organic and inorganic P practices on spikes m−2 while their interaction effect was non-significant except for grains per spike (Table 1). FYM and sugar cane straw (Bagasse) produced significantly more (389 and 327) spikes m−2, while fewer spikes (304) m−2 were logged in the control plots. Regarding inorganic P application, a greater number of spikes m−2 were noted with SSP (419), DAP (382) and 100% acidulated RP (351), followed by 50% acidulated RP (321) and RP alone (301), while minimum spikes m−2 (267) were observed in the control plot.
A significant effect of organic, inorganic P and their interaction was noted in grains per spike (Table 1). Farmyard manure (57) and sugar cane straw (54) produced significantly higher grains spike−1, while minimum grains spike−1 (44) were noted in the control plots. Among the inorganic P practices, a greater number of 61, 58, and 55 grains spike−1 were noted with SSP, DAP and 100% acidulated RP, respectively, followed by 50% acidulated RP (49) and RP alone (46), while the lowest were observed in the control. In the case of their combination SSP along with FYM, maximum (71) grains spike−1 was given when compared to all possible interactions as presented in Figure 1.
The plant height (cm) of wheat was significantly impacted by organic and inorganic phosphorus, while their interaction effect was non-significant (Table 1). The tallest plants of 91.2 and 90.2 cm height were recorded in plots receiving FYM and sugar cane straw (Bagasse) as an organic P treatment, respectively, while the minimum plant height (82.0 cm) was observed under the control plot. Among inorganic P treatment, taller plants of height of 95.5, 91.1 and 89.9 cm were noted with the sole application of SSP, DAP and 100% acidulated RP, respectively, while in the remaining inorganic treatments including 50% acidulated RP, RP alone maintained plant height up to 86.7 and 84.3 cm, respectively. The minimum plant height (79.4 cm) was observed under the control inorganic P.

3.2. Thousand Grains Weight, Biological and Grain Yield (kg ha−1) of Wheat

The analysis of variance confirmed that thousand grains weight varied significantly by organic and inorganic treatments of P, while their interaction was non-significant (Table 2). Maximum thousand grains weight (38.8 and 37.7 g) was noted with FYM and sugar cane straw (Bagasse) over the control (36.0 g)t. Between inorganic phosphorus treatment, maximum thousand grains weight (39.7, 39.2, 38.0 g) was noted with SSP, DAP and 100% acidulated RP, while 50% acidulated RP and RP alone produced 1000 grains with 37.1 and 36 g, respectively. The lighter grains were observed in the control plot.
Similarly, variation in biological yield of the wheat crop was in response to organic and inorganic phosphorus, while interaction had no effect (Table 2). Farmyard manure (FYM) gave a maximum biological yield (9981.1 kg ha−1), whereas the minimum (8398.5 kg ha−1) was observed in the control plots. Among inorganic P treatments, the application of SSP and DAP produced maximum (11,022.9 and 10,114.8 kg ha−1) biological yield in comparison to control (7812.7 kg ha−1).
According to the statistical analysis, it was found that the application of both organic and inorganic sources significantly affects the grain yield of wheat, while their interaction effect was non-significant (Table 2). The maximum grain yield (4058.0 and 3701.0 kg ha−1) was noted with the treatment of FYM and sugar cane straw (Bagasse), while the minimum (3606.4 kg ha−1) was noted in the control plots. In the main plot treatments, the application of SSP and DAP maintained more grain yield (4021.9 and 3917.1 kg ha−1) while the minimum (3533.8 kg ha−1) was maintained in the control plots. This may be possibly due to the reduced pH surrounding the SSP that brought down the fixation of P with larger movement and accessibility of P from the SSP. Higher grain yield in the case of SSP over other sources of phosphatic fertilizer may be due to the additional number of SSP, which enhanced the accessibility of phosphorus to the plants.

3.3. Concentration of P (mg kg−1) in the Wheat Leaves at Tillering and Anthesis Stage

Phosphorus (P) content in wheat leaves was measured at the tillering and anthesis stage and for soil at the heading and post-harvest stages as presented in Table 3. The findings in (Figure 2) revealed considerable differences in P resulting from the interaction of various organic and inorganic P sources. Applying SSP resulted in optimum accumulation of P (2.635 mg kg−1 tissue) at the tillering stage, while a reduced concentration (2.278 mg kg−1 tissue) was identified in the control plots. In the case of RP treatments, the greater (2.502 mg kg−1 tissue) was obtained in plots receiving 100% acidulated RP, while the minimum (2.461 and 2.356 mg kg−1 tissue) was revealed in RP alone and 50% acidulated RP. In relation to organic P treatments, the application of FYM as a supplier of organic P provides maximum (2.530 mg kg−1 tissue) P concentration in the leaves at the tillering stage, while minimum (2.423 g and 2.412 mg kg−1 tissue) was recognized in the control and Bagasse treatments, with FYM and SSP treatments (2.756 mg of kg−1 tissue) were indicated in the case of the highest possible combination.
The wheat leaves were examined at the anthesis stage for the residual and direct influence of organic and inorganic P concentrations. Based on the statistical analysis of the data, there was a considerable variation in P concentration in the application of organic and inorganic P in wheat leaves during the anthesis stage (Table 3). For inorganic P, the application of SSP produced the maximum concentration of P (2.50 mg kg−1 tissue) at the anthesis level, whereas the control plots observed the minimum concentration (2.16 mg kg−1 tissue). A greater concentration of (2.40 g kg−1 tissue) of P was observed in plots receiving 100 percent acidulated RP treatments, while the minimum (2.38 and 2.25 mg kg−1 tissue) was observed in 50 percent acidulated and sample RP. In relation to organic P treatments, the application of FYM as a supplier of organic P gives maximum (2.41 mg kg−1 tissue) P content in the anthesis stage of the leaves, while the minimum (2.30 and 2.35 mg kg−1 tissue) is noted in the control and Bagasse treatments.
Results presented in Figure 3 showed a significant variation for soil P at the heading stage through organic, synthetic application and their interaction. Maximum (1.73 mg kg−1) soil P was noted by SSP as a source of inorganic P as compared to the control plots (1.37 mg kg−1). Regarding RP application, 100% acidulated RP gave maximum soil P (1.51 mg kg−1) when compared to simple and 50% acidulated RP. In the case of organic phosphorus management, FYM gave the maximum (2.0 mg kg−1) soil phosphorus over the control and Bagasse treatments, while in combination, the application of SSP with FYM was superior over other soil p treatments.
Data on soil phosphorus (P) at the post-harvest stage of wheat as affected by soil organic and inorganic phosphorus treatments are described in Figure 4. Data showed significant variation for soil P at the post-harvest stage in response to the application of organic, inorganic (Table 3) and their interaction. Maximum (1.56 mg kg−1) soil P was noted in the plots received by the application of SSP as sources of inorganic p as a match to the control plots, which maintained (1.20 mg kg−1). Regarding RP application, 100% acidulated RP gave maximum (1.48 mg kg−1 over RP alone and 50% acidulated RP). In organic phosphorus management, FYM gave maximum (1.46 mg kg−1) soil phosphorus over the control and Bagasse treatments, while in combination, the application of SSP with FYM was better over other treatments. This might be because P is long-term fertilizer that releases very slowly, so it remains in the soil.

3.4. Phosphorus Use Efficiency (PUE%)

Phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) of wheat was significantly affected by organic, inorganic P, and their interaction is presented in Table 4. The maximum (9.0 and 7.8%) PUE was noted when FYM and sugar cane straw (Bagasse) was used as phosphorus management, while the minimum (5.9%) was maintained by the control plots. Regarding inorganic phosphorus management, higher PUEs of 10.5, 8.0 and 7.2% were observed in plots that received SSP, DAP and 100% acidulated RP as P fertilizers, respectively, while 50% acidulated and simple RP maintained 6.9 and 6.6 %PUE when compared to the control plots (6.3%). In the case of interaction, the combination of FYM and SSP maintained a good result and gave the maximum PUE (12.5%) as compared to other treatment combinations.

4. Discussion

Our results of P concentration at various stages of crop growth were in line with the previous study by Naseer [20], who suggested that the maximum concentration of P in leaves at various growth stages of the crop was obtained by the supplementations of P as an SSP. Phosphorus becomes more radially available to the crop with the application of SSP as compared to RP and FYM [6]. The application of RP is not suitable for the improvement of P concentrations in calcareous soils. Mineral P provides nutrition for the early growth of sugarcane as compared to organic P [21]. Pongrac et al. [22] found that transport energy and food storage by crop leaf also depends on the concentration of P in leaves. Leaf and its chlorophyll content are structured by the phosphorus use efficiency [23].
The P uptake was positively enhanced by the supplementations of P as an SSP form as supported by Shrivastava et al. [24]. They concluded that the application of SSP gives the best result with respect to P when compared to RP, TSP and organic manures. It may be due to the improvement of available soil phosphorus and reduction in N loss from the soil with the application of SSP [25]. P transportation becomes limited at the crop maturity stage so it remains at the maximum amount in the soil profile [26]. Mineralization of RP and FYM is slow as compared to SSP because RP and FYM release P over a longer time [27].
The application of P mineral fertilizers in combination with organic fertilizers gives the best results regarding soil fertility and nutrient availability [28]. This could be attributed to the slow release of minerals from organic sources and it restricts the leaching of mineral nutrients from the soil [29]. High nutrient uptake was observed in the plots treated with both FYM and mineral fertilizers. Ghosh et al. [30] suggested that coating P fertilizer granules with layers of organic materials results in higher absorption and efficiency in the use of P compared with uncoated fertilizer [31]. Organic acids released during the decomposition process are good chelating agents for P and increase its availability from applied P fertilizers [32].
We observed that both soil P fertility and wheat productivity were significantly improved with the applications of different forms of mineral P fertilizers. The results are in accordance with [33] who reported that crop germination and its yield are mostly dependent on reserved food and P availability. Kaushal et al. [34] concluded the availability of nutrients is more rapid in mineral fertilizers as compared to organic sources, which influence seed germination [35]. These results are in agreement with [36], who stated that applications of phosphorus optimized the emergence m−2. Our results are also confirmed by Blair et al. [37]. The application of FYM enhanced soil fertility, soil organic matter, and heightened microbial availability [38]. The application of organic matter such as poultry manure and farm yard manure showed a maximum number of tillers per meter squared, according to Patra et al. [39], which supports the findings of our research. Our results also match with Ahmad et al. [40]. Regarding inorganic P application, early (131 and 133) days to anthesis were noted with SSP and DAP treatment, while 135 days to anthesis were noted with 100% acidulated rock phosphate over the control. Khalil et al. [41] described that phosphorus fertilizers enhanced different stages of wheat growth. Our findings also agree with [42]. The same results have been reported by Ibrahim et al. [43] who stated that wheat growth and yield were significantly increased by P application. Regarding inorganic phosphorus application, SSP and DAP gave more spikes as compared to the remaining treatments. The same finding has previously been reported by Ottman et al. [44]. Both reported that the integrated approach of nutrients enhances different parameters of many crops. The same approach was discussed by [45], where among inorganic phosphorus treatments, a smaller number of non-productive tillers (12, 13, 14, 15 and 16) m−2 were maintained by SSP, DAP, 100% acidulated RP and 50% acidulated RP; however, the application of RP alone had a lead over the control as well as all others, and (20) non-productive tillers m−2 were maintained.
Our findings regarding the improvement in wheat grain yield in response to P application conform with that of Naing et al. [46]. They also observed improvement in rice grain yield by the integrated application of FYM with inorganic fertilizers. Adequate soil management with organic manure provides a long-lasting effect and slow release of minerals to the soil, which decreases the future cost of production and increases future crop output [47]. The agronomic parameters of the crop were significantly influenced by the application of organic manure [48]. Khalil et al. [41] described increased maturity with a greater amount of phosphorus. Similar findings have also been observed by [49]. These findings are in agreement with [50], who observed the positive influence of phosphorus sources on plant height and concluded that SSP as a source of phosphorus fertilizer performs better than others.

5. Conclusions

The application of 90 kg P2O5 ha−1 as SSP or 100% acidulated rock phosphate, significantly improved wheat yield and P nutrition compared to other mineral sources including the control. When averaged across the mineral sources, the addition of 10 tons of FYM ha−1 as an organic amendment performed better than sugarcane straw. The interactive effect of SSP or 100% acidulated RP with FYM showed better results as compared to all other possible interactions in terms of P nutrition, yield and yield components in wheat. Therefore, the application of SSP or 100% acidulated RP at the rate of 90 kg P2O5 ha−1 along with 10 tons FYM ha−1 can be recommended for obtaining optimum and quality production of wheat under calcareous soils in arid and semiarid regions. However, these findings should be further verified under diverse agro-climatic conditions in long-term field trials before formulating countrywide recommendations.

Author Contributions

Data curation, M.A. (Manzoor Ahmad) and M.A. (Muhammad Adnan); Formal analysis, M.A. (Manzoor Ahmad), W.A.S., M.A. (Muhammad Adnan) and S.F.; Funding acquisition, M.A. (Manzoor Ahmad), W.A.S. and S.F.; Investigation, W.A.S., M.A. (Muhammad Adnan) and S.F.; Methodology, M.A. (Manzoor Ahmad), S.K. and B.A.; Project administration, M.M. and S.A.; Software, M.A. (Manzoor Ahmad), M.H.S., S.A. and M.H.; Supervision, Y.S.M.; Visualization, F.U.K., M.I., M.M., S.K., B.A. and Y.S.M.; Writing—original draft, M.H.S., F.U.K. and M.H.; Writing—review and editing, S.F., M.H.S., M.I. and S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University for funding this work through the research group program under grant number R.G.P. 1/97/43.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mengel, K.; Kirkby, E.A.; Kosegarten, H.; Appel, T. Principles of plant nutrition. Ann. Bot. 2004, 93, 479–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Alam, A.; Tariq, M.; Haq, I.; Ali, J.; Adnan, M.; Fahad, S.; Manzoor Ahmad, D.; Romman, M.; Hamzah Saleem, M.; Ahmad, S.; et al. Co-application of Phosphorus and Sulfur Improve Yield, Quality, and Nutrients Uptake in Nicotiana tabaccum L. Philipp. Agric. Sci. 2022, 105, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  3. Saleem, M.H.; Ali, S.; Rehman, M.; Rana, M.S.; Rizwan, M.; Kamran, M.; Imran, M.; Riaz, M.; Soliman, M.H.; Elkelish, A. Influence of phosphorus on copper phytoextraction via modulating cellular organelles in two jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) varieties grown in a copper mining soil of Hubei Province, China. Chemosphere 2020, 248, 126032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rashmi, I.; Biswas, A.K. Phosphorus Sorption Characteristics of Soils for Managing the Fertilizer Phosphorus in Three Dominant Soil Types of India. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett. 2018, 7, 725–731. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ullah, I.; Muhammad, D.; Mussarat, M.; Khan, S.; Adnan, M.; Fahad, S.; Ismail, M.; Ahmad Mian, I.; Ali, A.; Hamzah Saleem, M.; et al. Comparative effects of biochar and NPK on wheat crops under different management systems. Crop Pasture Sci. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sjonnesen, K.H. Breeding for Phosphorus Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Doctoral Dissertation, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sher, A.; Barbanti, L.; Ansar, M.; Manaf, A.; Kaleem, S. Late harvest associated with P and S fertilization enhances yield and quality of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), grown as a rainfed crop in Pakistan. Afr. J. Agri. Res. 2011, 6, 6232–6239. [Google Scholar]
  8. Alizadeh, P.; Fallah, S.; Raiesi, F. Potential N mineralization and availability to irrigated maize in a calcareous soil amended with organic manures and urea under field conditions. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2012, 6, 493–512. [Google Scholar]
  9. Leytem, A.B.; Mikkelsen, R.L. The nature of phosphorus in calcareous soils. Better Crop. 2005, 89, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shah, S.A.; Shah, S.M.; Wisal, M.; Shafi, M.; Haq, N.; Samreen, S.; Amir, M. Effect of integrated use of organic and inorganic nitrogen sources on wheat yield. Sarhad J. Agri. 2010, 26, 559–563. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hussain, I.; Khan, M.A.; Khan, E.A. Bread wheat varieties as influenced by different nitrogen levels. J. Zhejiang Uni. Sci. B 2006, 7, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Heidaryan, J.; Feilinezhad, A. On the Effect of Biofertilizers on the Yield and Yield Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) under Eyvan Climate Condition. Biol. Forum. 2015, 7, 581. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ali, B.; Wang, X.; Saleem, M.H.; Azeem, M.A.; Afridi, M.S.; Nadeem, M.; Ghazal, M.; Batool, T.; Qayyum, A.; Alatawi, A.; et al. Bacillus mycoides PM35 Reinforces Photosynthetic Efficiency, Antioxidant Defense, Expression of Stress-Responsive Genes, and Ameliorates the Effects of Salinity Stress in Maize. Life 2022, 12, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ali, B.; Wang, X.; Saleem, M.H.; Hafeez, A.; Afridi, M.S.; Khan, S.; Zaib-Un-Nisa; Ullah, A.I.; Amaral Júnior, A.T.; Alatawi, A.; et al. PGPR-Mediated Salt Tolerance in Maize by Modulating Plant Physiology, Antioxidant Defense, Compatible Solutes Accumulation and Bio-Surfactant Producing Genes. Plants 2022, 11, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Richard, L.A. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils. Soil Sci. 1947, 64, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Soltanpour, P.N.; Schwab, A.P. A new soil test for simultaneous extraction of macro- and micro-nutrients in alkaline soils. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1977, 8, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jones, J.B.; Wolf, B.; Mills, H.A. Plant analysis handbook. In A Practical Sampling, Preparation, Analysis, and Interpretation Guide; Micro-Macro Publishing, Inc.: Athens, GA, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jarrell, W.M.; Beverly, R.B. The dilution effect in plant nutrition studies. Adv. Agron. 1981, 34, 197–224. [Google Scholar]
  19. Steel, R.G.D.; Torrie, J.H. Principles and Procedure of Statistics, 2nd ed.; Mc, Graw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  20. Naseer, M. Role of Rock Phosphate Crop Production in Alkaline Calcareous Soil. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  21. de Marchi Soares, T.; Raniro, H.R.; Pavinato, P.S. Sugarcane Byproduct Influence on Mineral Fertilizer Solubility and Phosphorus Dynamics in the Soil. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2022, 22, 1458–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pongrac, P.; Fischer, S.; Thompson, J.A.; Wright, G.; White, P.J. Early responses of Brassica oleracea roots to zinc supply under sufficient and sub-optimal phosphorus supply. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mao, Q.; Lu, X.; Mo, H.; Gundersen, P.; Mo, J. Effects of simulated N deposition on foliar nutrient status, N metabolism and photosynthetic capacity of three dominant understory plant species in a mature tropical forest. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 610, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Suhan, B.K.; Shuchi, S.B.; Nahid, A. Present Scenario, Difficulties and Qualitative Development Policy Analysis of Urea Fertilizer Industrial Sector in Bangladesh: A Review. Agric. Rev. 2021, 42, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, J.; Zhang, A.; Li, G.; Wei, Y.; He, S.; Lin, Z.; Wang, Q. Effect of different components of single superphosphate on organic matter degradation and maturity during pig manure composting. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 646, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xie, Y.; Yan, Z.; Niu, Z.; Coulter, J.A.; Niu, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L. Yield, oil content, and fatty acid profile of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) as affected by phosphorus rate and seeding rate. Indus. Crops Prod. 2020, 145, 112087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liang, S.; Deng, J.; Jiang, Y.; Wu, S.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, W. Functional Distribution of Bacterial Community under Different Land Use Patterns Based on FaProTax Function Prediction. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 29, 1245–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gupta, N.; Gupta, A.; Saxena, K.K.; Shukla, A.; Goyal, S.K. Mechanical and durability properties of geopolymer concrete composite at varying superplasticizer dosage. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 44, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, W.; Lin, Z.; Zhu, X.; Li, G.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, D. Improved tomato yield and quality by altering soil physicochemical properties and nitrification processes in the combined use of organic-inorganic fertilizers. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2022, 109, 103384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ghosh, D.; Brahmachari, K.; Skalický, M.; Roy, D.; Das, A.; Sarkar, S.; Hossain, A. The combination of organic and inorganic fertilizers influence the weed growth, productivity and soil fertility of monsoon rice. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0262586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Volf, M.R.; Rosolem, C.A. Soil P diffusion and availability modified by controlled-release P fertilizers. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021, 21, 162–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, W.; Ding, X.; Xue, S.; Li, S.; Liao, X.; Wang, R. Effects of organic-matter application on phosphorus adsorption of three soil parent materials. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2013, 13, 1003–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Tiwari, K.N. Phosphorus and potassium fertilization reduces dry weather and late harvest risks. Fert. Knowl. 2002, 2, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kaushal, A.K.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, D.; Singh, C.; Bharti, A.K. Impact of hydropriming and organic manure on seed emergance, seed vigour and grain yield of wheat (Triticum durum L.) under rainfed condition. J. Pharm. Phytochem. 2022, 11, 171–174. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tabakovic, M.; Simic, M.; Stanisavljevic, R.; Milivojevic, M.; Secanski, M.; Postic, D. Effects of shape and size of hybrid maize seed on germination and vigour of different genotypes. Chil. J. Agr. Res. 2020, 80, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ayoub, M.; Guertin, S.; Lussier, S.; Smith, D.L. Timing and level of nitrogen fertility effects on spring wheat yield in eastern Canada. Crop Sci. 1994, 34, 748–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khan, M.A.; Basir, A.; Fahad, S.; Adnan, M.; Saleem, M.H.; Iqbal, A.; Amanullah; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Alosaimi, A.A.; Saud, S.; et al. Biochar Optimizes Wheat Quality, Yield, and Nitrogen Acquisition in Low Fertile Calcareous Soil Treated with Organic and Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizers. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 879788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kundu, S.; Bhattacharyya, R.; Prakash, V.; Ghosh, B.N.; Gupta, H.S. Carbon sequestration and relationship between carbon addition and storage under rainfed soybean–wheat rotation in a sandy loam soil of the Indian Himalayas. Soil Tillage Res. 2007, 92, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Patra, S.S.; Mehera, B.; Rout, S.; Tomar, S.S.; Singh, M.; Kumar, R. Effect of hydropriming and different sowing dates on growth and yield attributes of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2016, 8, 971–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ahmad, M.; Ahmad, M.; El-Naggar, A.H.; Usman, A.R.; Abduljabbar, A.; Vithanage, M.; Al-Wabel, M.I. Aging effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on phosphorus fractionation in a calcareous sandy loam soil. Pedosphere 2018, 28, 873–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Khalil, S.K.; Khan, S.; Rahman, A.; Khan, A.Z.; Khalil, I.H.; Amanullah, S.W.; Khan, A. Seed priming and phosphorus application enhance phenology and dry matter production of wheat. Pak. J. Bot. 2010, 42, 1849–1856. [Google Scholar]
  42. Tilahun, T.F.; Nigussie, D.; Wondimu, B.; Setegn, G. Effect of farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizers on the growth, yield and moisture stress tolerance of rain-fed lowland rice. Am. J. Res. Comm. 2013, 1, 275–301. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ibrahim, M.; Jamal, Y.; Basir, A.; Adnan, M. Response of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) to various levels of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in agro-climatic condition of Peshawar. Pure Appl. Biol. 2021, 5, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ottman, M.J. Response of Wheat and Barley Varieties to Phosphorus Fertilizer; University of Arizona: Tucson, AZ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  45. Badaruddin, M.; Reynolds, M.P.; Ageeb, O.A. Wheat management in warm environments: Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers, irrigation frequency, and mulching. Agron. J. 1999, 91, 975–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Naing Oo, A.; Banterng, P.; Polthanee, A.; Trelo-Ges, V. The effect of different fertilizers management strategies on growth and yield of upland black glutinous rice and soil property. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2010, 9, 414–422. [Google Scholar]
  47. Adekiya, A.O.; Olaniran, A.F.; Adenusi, T.T.; Aremu, C.; Ejue, W.S.; Iranloye, Y.M.; Olayanju, A. Effects of cow dung and wood biochars and green manure on soil fertility and tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus L.) performance on a savanna Alfisol. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Adekiya, A.O.; Ejue, W.S.; Olayanju, A.; Dunsin, O.; Aboyeji, C.M.; Aremu, C.; Akinpelu, O. Different organic manure sources and NPK fertilizer on soil chemical properties, growth, yield and quality of okra. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Demirkaya, M.; Gunes, A. Effects of different phosphorus and potassium doses on yield and amino acid composition of capia pepper. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2020, 29, 1121–1128. [Google Scholar]
  50. Maqbool, M.M.; Ahmad, M.; Ali, A.; Mehmood, R.; Ahmad, M.; Sarwar, M. Optimizing the method and source of phosphatic nutrition for wheat (Triticum astivum L.) under agro-climate of Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan. Pak. J. Nutr. 2012, 11, 787. [Google Scholar]
Sustainability 14 07669 g001 550
Figure 1. Grains spike−1 of wheat as affected by the interaction of organic amendments and phosphorus sources. Bar chart with different letters is significantly different at α = 0.05. RP, SSP and DAP represent rock phosphate, single super phosphate and di-ammonium phosphate, respectively.
Figure 1. Grains spike−1 of wheat as affected by the interaction of organic amendments and phosphorus sources. Bar chart with different letters is significantly different at α = 0.05. RP, SSP and DAP represent rock phosphate, single super phosphate and di-ammonium phosphate, respectively.
Sustainability 14 07669 g001
Sustainability 14 07669 g002 550
Figure 2. Interactive effect of organic amendments and phosphorus (P) sources on leaves P concentration at tillering stage. Bar chart with different letters is significantly different at α = 0.05. RP, SSP and DAP represent rock phosphate, single super phosphate and di-ammonium phosphate, respectively.
Figure 2. Interactive effect of organic amendments and phosphorus (P) sources on leaves P concentration at tillering stage. Bar chart with different letters is significantly different at α = 0.05. RP, SSP and DAP represent rock phosphate, single super phosphate and di-ammonium phosphate, respectively.
Sustainability 14 07669 g002
Sustainability 14 07669 g003 550
Figure 3. Interactive effect of organic amendments and phosphorus sources on soil P concentration at heading stage. Bar chart with different letters is significantly different at α = 0.05. RP, SSP and DAP represent rock phosphate, single super phosphate and di-ammonium phosphate, respectively.
Figure 3. Interactive effect of organic amendments and phosphorus sources on soil P concentration at heading stage. Bar chart with different letters is significantly different at α = 0.05. RP, SSP and DAP represent rock phosphate, single super phosphate and di-ammonium phosphate, respectively.
Sustainability 14 07669 g003
Sustainability 14 07669 g004 550
Figure 4. Post-harvest soil P as affected by the interaction of organic amendments and phosphorus sources. Bar chart with different letters is significantly different at α = 0.05. RP, SSP and DAP represent rock phosphate, single super phosphate and di-ammonium phosphate, respectively.
Figure 4. Post-harvest soil P as affected by the interaction of organic amendments and phosphorus sources. Bar chart with different letters is significantly different at α = 0.05. RP, SSP and DAP represent rock phosphate, single super phosphate and di-ammonium phosphate, respectively.
Sustainability 14 07669 g004
Table
Table 1. Spike m−2, grains spike−1 and plant height (cm) of wheat as affected by organic and inorganic phosphorus management.
Table 1. Spike m−2, grains spike−1 and plant height (cm) of wheat as affected by organic and inorganic phosphorus management.
Organic Amendments
(10 t ha−1)		Spike m−2Grains Spike−1Plant Height (cm)
Control304 c44 c90.2 b
FYM389 a57 a91.2 a
Bagasse327 b54 b82.0 c
LSD (α = 0.05)19.1951.8973.394
P Sources(90 kg ha−1)
Control267 f42 f79.4 f
Rock Phosphate (RP) 301 e46 e84.3 e
50% Acidulated RP321 d49 d86.7 d
100% Acidulated RP351 c55 c89.9 c
SSP419 a61 a91.5 a
DAP382 b58 b95.1 b
LSD (α = 0.05)21.6224.2093.754
Organic Amendments * P Sources
LSD (α = 0.05)NS4.648 (Figure 1)NS
Means of the applicable group led by specific letter(s) are markedly different at 5% probability. FYM, SSP, DAP, LSD, * and NS stand for farmyard manure, single super phosphate, di-ammonium phosphate, least significant difference value, interaction, and non-significant interaction at α = 0.05, respectively.
Table
Table 2. Thousand grains weight (g), grain and biological yield (kg ha−1) of wheat as affected by organic and inorganic phosphorus management.
Table 2. Thousand grains weight (g), grain and biological yield (kg ha−1) of wheat as affected by organic and inorganic phosphorus management.
Organic Amendments
(10 t ha−1)		Thousand Grains weight (g)Biological Yield (kg ha−1)Grain Yield (kg ha−1)
Control36.0 c8398.5 c3606.4 c
FYM38.8 a9981.1 a4058.0 a
Bagasse37.7 b9591.2 b3701.0 b
LSD (α = 0.05)1.516309.269154.945
P Sources(90 kg ha−1)
Control34.9 f7812.7 f3533.8 f
Rock Phosphate (RP) 36.0 e8509.4 e3661.8 e
50% Acidulated RP37.1 d8996.6 d3777.0 d
100% Acidulated RP38.0 c9485.3 c3819.3 c
SSP39.7 a11,022.9 a4021.9 a
DAP39.2 b10,114.8 b3917.1 b
LSD (α = 0.05)1.981544.496161.187
Organic Amendments * P sources
LSD (α = 0.05)NSNSNS
Means of the applicable group led by specific letter(s) are markedly different at 5% probability. FYM. SSP, DAP, LSD, * and NS stand for farmyard manure, single super phosphate, di-ammonium phosphate, least significant difference value, interaction and non-significant interaction at α = 0.05, respectively.
Table
Table 3. Effect of organic amendments and P sources on leaves (mg g−1) and soil P (mg kg−1) concentration at different growth stages.
Table 3. Effect of organic amendments and P sources on leaves (mg g−1) and soil P (mg kg−1) concentration at different growth stages.
Organic Amendments
(10 t ha−1)		Leaves P (mg g−1)Soil P (mg kg−1)
Tillering StageAnthesis StageHeading StagePost-Harvest
Control2.423 b2.298 c1.021 c1.322 c
FYM2.530 a2.409 a2.006 a1.458 a
Bagasse2.412 b2.351 b1.430 b1.409 b
LSD (α = 0.05)0.04790.03150.09670.0433
P Sources(90 kg ha−1)
Control2.278 d2.165 d1.368 b1.204 e
Rock Phosphate (RP) 2.356 c2.248 c1.406 b1.334 d
50% Acidulated RP2.461 b2.384 b1.482 b1.392 cd
100% Acidulated RP2.502 b2.405 b1.510 b1.477 b
SSP2.635 a2.499 a1.731 a1.559 a
DAP2.499 b2.416 b1.421 b1.412 c
LSD (α=0.05)0.08340.05490.16850.0754
Organic Amendments * P Sources
LSD (α=0.05)0.1802
(Figure 2)		NS0.3638
(Figure 3)		0.1628
(Figure 4)
Means of the applicable group led by specific letter(s) are markedly different at 5% probability. FYM. SSP, DAP, LSD, * and NS stand for farmyard manure, single super phosphate, di-ammonium phosphate, least significant difference value, interaction and non-significant interaction at α = 0.05, respectively.
Table
Table 4. Phosphorus use efficiency (%) of wheat as affected by organic and inorganic phosphorus management.
Table 4. Phosphorus use efficiency (%) of wheat as affected by organic and inorganic phosphorus management.
Phosphorus Sources (90 kg ha−1)Organic Amendments (10 t ha−1)Means
ControlFYMBagasse
Control5.2 i7.2 gh6.6 h6.3 f
Rock Phosphate (RP) 5.3 i7.6 fg6.9 gh6.6 e
50% Acidulated RP5.4 i8.5 de6.8 h6.9 d
100% Acidulated RP5.6 i8.8 cd7.2 gh7.2 c
SSP 8.0 ef12.5 a10.9 b10.5 a
DAP5.8 i9.5 c8.6 de8.0 b
Means5.9 c9.0 a7.8 b-
LSD for organic amendments, P sources and their interaction are, 0.181, 0.250 and 0.433, respectively. Means of the applicable group led by specific letter(s) are markedly different at 5% probability. FYM. SSP, DAP and LSD stand for farmyard manure, single super phosphate, di-ammonium phosphate and least significant difference value, respectively.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmad, M.; Ishaq, M.; Shah, W.A.; Adnan, M.; Fahad, S.; Saleem, M.H.; Khan, F.U.; Mussarat, M.; Khan, S.; Ali, B.; et al. Managing Phosphorus Availability from Organic and Inorganic Sources for Optimum Wheat Production in Calcareous Soils. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137669

AMA Style

Ahmad M, Ishaq M, Shah WA, Adnan M, Fahad S, Saleem MH, Khan FU, Mussarat M, Khan S, Ali B, et al. Managing Phosphorus Availability from Organic and Inorganic Sources for Optimum Wheat Production in Calcareous Soils. Sustainability. 2022; 14(13):7669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137669

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmad, Manzoor, Muhammad Ishaq, Wajid Ali Shah, Muhammad Adnan, Shah Fahad, Muhammad Hamzah Saleem, Fahim Ullah Khan, Maria Mussarat, Shadman Khan, Baber Ali, and et al. 2022. "Managing Phosphorus Availability from Organic and Inorganic Sources for Optimum Wheat Production in Calcareous Soils" Sustainability 14, no. 13: 7669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137669

APA Style

Ahmad, M., Ishaq, M., Shah, W. A., Adnan, M., Fahad, S., Saleem, M. H., Khan, F. U., Mussarat, M., Khan, S., Ali, B., Mostafa, Y. S., Alamri, S., & Hashem, M. (2022). Managing Phosphorus Availability from Organic and Inorganic Sources for Optimum Wheat Production in Calcareous Soils. Sustainability, 14(13), 7669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137669

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop