Next Article in Journal
Analysis of the Population Structure and Dynamic of Endemic Salvia ceratophylloides Ard. (Lamiaceae)
Previous Article in Journal
Is COVID-19 Herd Immunity Influenced by Population Densities of Cities?
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Smart and Sustainable Management of Shoe Machinery Companies in Taiwan during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Case Studies of the Tung Sheng Company and Strong Basic Enterprise Limited Company

Sustainability 2022, 14(16), 10274; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610274
by Ming-Ta Tu 1, Li-Shiue Gau 2,3,*, Ji-Hwan Park 4, Wen-Shin Huang 5, Pham Thuy Duong 6 and Jong-Chae Kim 7
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Sustainability 2022, 14(16), 10274; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610274
Submission received: 26 June 2022 / Revised: 29 July 2022 / Accepted: 14 August 2022 / Published: 18 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Title

It must be short and I suggest to remove company name.

Abstract

It must be started with objective to conduct this study.

Introduction

The start should be from the introducing sustainable management and its implications then current study methods.

I suggest to add more line in beginning and not from the methods the authors used.

Authors must create an urgency why this study is required in starting paragraphs

Correct the following lines according heading

1.2. Knowledge Management and Business Model Innovation

“In today’s information and knowledge based business environment, a firm’s 88 knowledge management (KM) is defined as capabilities to continuously learn and lever-89 age knowledge and convert that knowledge for new value proposition, creation, and cap-90 ture in business model innovation”

Instead of this highlighted text just

Define : Knowledge Management and Business Model Innovation

In the following heading

3. Research Methods

3.1. Research Design

Define firstly

What is Case Study

What are methods to conduct good case study with references

Finally explain your methods in detail how you conduct current case study

Extend conclusion section

 

 

 

Author Response

Comments and replies

 

Reviewer 1

Comments

Replies

Title

It must be short and I suggest to remove company name.

 

We would like to leave this final decision to the journal editor. However the current title is helpful for the readers. From this title, readers can quickly tell whether they are interested in this paper.

Abstract

It must be started with objective to conduct this study.  

 

Yes, the first sentence of the abstract is the objective. Hope the reviewer may read it again.

1.      Introduction

The start should be from the introducing sustainable management and its implications then current study methods.

I suggest to add more line in beginning and not from the methods the authors used.

Authors must create an urgency why this study is required in starting paragraphs

 

Because this manuscript is a case report, we want it to be straightforward and so the “Introduction” just follows the research framework in Figure 1.

 

The urgency is quite obvious shown in the Title: Case studies, Smart and Sustainable Management, application in shoes Machinery Company in Taiwan, during the Covid-19 Pandemic, along with the case company’s names. We believe that from this title, readers can quickly decide whether to read this paper.

4. Correct the following lines according heading

1.2. Knowledge Management and Business Model Innovation

“In today’s information and knowledge based business environment, a firm’s knowledge management (KM) is defined as capabilities to continuously learn and leverage knowledge and convert that knowledge for new value proposition, creation, and capture in business model innovation”

Instead of this highlighted text just Define : Knowledge Management and Business Model Innovation

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you for your comment, but this sentence do try to define knowledge management as you can see in the sentence: “a firm’s knowledge management (KM) is defined as”.

 

The second paragraph of this section, “1.2. Knowledge Management and Business Model Innovation,” tries to define business model innovation.

5. In the following heading

3. Research Methods

3.1. Research Design

Define firstly

What is Case Study

What are methods to conduct good case study with references

Finally explain your methods in detail how you conduct current case study

 

Responding to this comment, a brief definition of case study is added:

 

Adopted was case study research, an empirical inquiry that investigates the individual such as organization, group, and industry within its real context [28] [29].

 

Our methods already include good case study. For example:

“Two practical case studies were included with also a heuristic inquiry research design [30].”

 

One more is added to mention “triangulate”:

 

Multiple sources of data collection were used to “triangulate” (i.e., confirm and deepen understanding) within the same case [29].

6. Extend conclusion section

One paragraph is added:

 

The case company in this study, Tung Sheng Company Limited, has founded for 57 years, which is one of leading companies in Taiwan specializing in rubber and vulcanized footwear manufacturing machines [23]. Another case company, Strong Basic Enterprise Limited, was established later in 1992 as a subsidiary for Tung Sheng Company, which primarily helps coordinate with other relevant companies to provide a complete service plan for customers, to design production equipment and set up whole plants in local communities worldwide with after-sales service and follow-up maintenance [23, 25]. These two companies cooperate with each other: Strong Basic Enterprise directly faces the clients to understand what they want whereas Tung Sheng Company tries to manufacture machines to meet clients’ needs and focus on solving technical problems occurred in machines. It becomes a cycle: First, Strong Basic Enterprise conducted client need analysis and transferred the results to Tung Sheng Company or tried to out-source; second, Strong Basic Enterprise applied its intelligent manufacturing technology to customize the machines and equipment with improvement, upgrading and resilience; third, Strong Basic Enterprise tried to make the sales.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Author(s), 

Thank you for the opportunity to review your manuscript titled "Smart and Sustainable Management of Shoes Machinery Company in Taiwan during the Covid-19 Pandemic-Case Studies of the Tung Sheng Company and Strong Basic Enterprise Limited Company". Although the work has merit, several issues need to be addressed. 

Overall, your work needs a clearer description of the gap you are addressing. Business models, especially in the sustainability space, are an important area, but is a fair amount of work on that topic already so its important to position your work accordingly. There are also some relevant references missing:

Bansal, P., Grewatsch, S., & Sharma, G. (2021). How COVID-19 informs business sustainability research: It’s time for a systems perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 602–606.

Neumeyer, X., Ashton, W. S., & Dentchev, N. (2020). Addressing resource and waste management challenges imposed by COVID-19: An entrepreneurship perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 105058.

Ranjbari, M., Esfandabadi, Z. S., Zanetti, M. C., Scagnelli, S. D., Siebers, P.-O., Aghbashlo, M., Peng, W., Quatraro, F., & Tabatabaei, M. (2021). Three pillars of sustainability in the wake of COVID-19: A systematic review and future research agenda for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126660.

With respect to your research questions, you should be more specific there as well. It seems that you are trying to cover too much space, and you do not refer back to some of these questions later on in your paper. 

Therefore, you need to clean a few sections up and provide a meaningful research framework that meaningfully connects the different parts of your paper.

I hope that helps and I wish you best of luck in the review process.

 

Author Response

 

Reviewer 2

Comments

Replies

Thank you for the opportunity to review your manuscript titled "Smart and Sustainable Management of Shoes Machinery Company in Taiwan during the Covid-19 Pandemic-Case Studies of the Tung Sheng Company and Strong Basic Enterprise Limited Company". Although the work has merit, several issues need to be addressed. 

Overall, your work needs a clearer description of the gap you are addressing. Business models, especially in the sustainability space, are an important area, but is a fair amount of work on that topic already so its important to position your work accordingly. There are also some relevant references missing:

Bansal, P., Grewatsch, S., & Sharma, G. (2021). How COVID-19 informs business sustainability research: It’s time for a systems perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 602–606.

Neumeyer, X., Ashton, W. S., & Dentchev, N. (2020). Addressing resource and waste management challenges imposed by COVID-19: An entrepreneurship perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 105058.

Ranjbari, M., Esfandabadi, Z. S., Zanetti, M. C., Scagnelli, S. D., Siebers, P.-O., Aghbashlo, M., Peng, W., Quatraro, F., & Tabatabaei, M. (2021). Three pillars of sustainability in the wake of COVID-19: A systematic review and future research agenda for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126660.

 

 

Thank you very much for your review.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This paper is a case report with the application of business sustainability, not intending for a business sustainability review to identify a gap in development of business models.

 

We appreciate the reviewer’s provision of relevant references. The three references are added:

 

It is important for business sustainability managers to better understand the implications of Covid-19 on business by taking a systems perspective [31][32] and to address innovative manufacturing, resource and waste management [33].

With respect to your research questions, you should be more specific there as well. It seems that you are trying to cover too much space, and you do not refer back to some of these questions later on in your paper.  

 

Therefore, you need to clean a few sections up and provide a meaningful research framework that meaningfully connects the different parts of your paper.

 

I hope that helps and I wish you best of luck in the review process.

 

A research framework is provided in Figure 1. This paper is a case report with empirical investigation, but not specifically to answer any research questions.

 

Reviewer may refer to research design:

 

Adopted was case study research, an empirical inquiry that investigates the individual such as organization, group, and industry within its real context [28] [29].

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The results presented here are very simple. The two cases are not compared with each other, nor are the individual answers given. 

 We recommend broadening the reference base with regard to smart business models and how the digital transition is affecting the process of business model generation and innovation, e.g. from Bigdata. 

 

Line 128: "goas"

Author Response

 

Reviewer 3

Comments

Replies

The results presented here are very simple. The two cases are not compared with each other, nor are the individual answers given. 

 

In order to clarify the relationship between the two cases, more information is added in “Conclusion.”

 

The case company in this study, Tung Sheng Company Limited, has founded for 57 years, which is one of leading companies in Taiwan specializing in rubber and vulcanized footwear manufacturing machines [23]. Another case company, Strong Basic Enterprise Limited, was established later in 1992 as a subsidiary for Tung Sheng Company, which primarily helps coordinate with other relevant companies to provide a complete service plan for customers, to design production equipment and set up whole plants in local communities worldwide with after-sales service and follow-up maintenance [23, 25]. These two companies cooperate with each other: Strong Basic Enterprise directly faces the clients to understand what they want whereas Tung Sheng Company tries to manufacture machines to meet clients’ needs and focus on solving technical problems occurred in machines. It becomes a cycle: First, Strong Basic Enterprise conducted client need analysis and transferred the results to Tung Sheng Company or tried to out-source; second, Strong Basic Enterprise applied its intelligent manufacturing technology to customize the machines and equipment with improvement, upgrading and resilience; third, Strong Basic Enterprise tried to make the sales.

We recommend broadening the reference base with regard to smart business models and how the digital transition is affecting the process of business model generation and innovation, e.g. from Big data. 

 

This paper is a case report. The suggestion is beyond the scope of this paper. However, the reviewer’s recommendation is put in further research:

 

More research is required to apply big data analysis, artificial intelligence or any new technology for increase of automation or smart manufacturing by digital transmission, detection and adjustment in the shoes-making process, because it keeps a challenge to standardize the accessories or semi-products in the manufacturing process of making vulcanized shoes due to changeable characteristics of rubber materials.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Changes were good. Abstract needs to be condensed and remaining grammatical errors corrected. 

Author Response

1. Comment: Changes were good.

Reply: Thank you.

2. Comment: Abstract needs to be condensed and remaining grammatical errors corrected. 

The abstract is condensed from 200 to 150 words and carefully checked to correct grammatical errors, as you can see in the revised version below or in the re-submitted manuscript (“Track Changes” function used).

Abstract:

This case report combined PEST, SWOT, a business model canvas, and knowledge management to develop a theoretical framework for assessing business, smart and sustainable management of two case companies: Tung Sheng and Strong Basic in Taiwan during the Covid-19 pandemic. A case and heuristic inquiry research design was adopted. Secondary data and interviews with top managers were used to triangulate within the same cases. The results showed that case companies owned capabilities of R & D as a foundation to further apply new smart ICT (information and communication technology) and execute green manufacturing. Strong key partnerships were useful resources to diversify business investment although current qualified employees were not sufficient. Resilient practices included adopting new and green technology to mitigate the negative impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic. This study concluded a useful framework for case research and provided practical information about business models, smart and sustainable management of two cases.

 

Back to TopTop