Vectors of Sustainable Development and Global Knowledge in the Metallic Materials Industry in Romania
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- -
- The use of multi and interdisciplinary integration tools, so that the new model should provide the theoretical framework for understanding adaptive and evolutionary transformations, i.e., designing new methodological and managerial tools.Multi and interdisciplinary integration is not a novel concept. “Interdisciplinary integration” indicates that scientists, researchers, and the community must work together to resolve global issues [8];
- -
- Achieving the integration of sectorial knowledge, provided by a wide range of disciplines, in order to understand the mega system integration events.For “integration” to be effective it is important to understand which attempts, and importantly, why, some attempts at interdisciplinary integration succeed [8];
- -
- The permanent reactivation of human thinking which, compared to the technique development, cannot come immediately and consecutively after the development of material life.
2. Theoretical Basis
- -
- Sustainability, as the main lever in the evolution of the development, at a higher level, of the metallic materials industry. The time interval of the analyzed period is 2000–2021;
- -
- SustainableIndustry 4.0, as a concept for the development of the metal materials industry, using advances in ICT, new global knowledge and the latest and most advanced techniques and technologies with a low impact on the environment. The time interval of the analyzed period is 2011–2022.
3. Results
3.1. Bibliometric Analysis
3.2. The Global Knowledge
- -
- The interactions and inter-conditionings occurring in the convergence areas of the four systems of the eco–socio–economic–technological mega system should be studied in-depth, using the postulate of the interdependence of parts and the priorities of the whole in relation to these parts [21];
- -
- It is necessary to minimize the negative inter-conditionings between the technological system (producer of metal materials and metallurgical services) and the other systems;
- -
- The natural-ecological system must be supported to be able to perform its two fundamental functions (resource provider for the other systems and processing or storage basin for the polluting secondary materials);
- -
- The eco–socio–economic–technological mega system investigation is a matter that is based on specialization, disciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity;
- -
- The possibility to generate new ideas by the specialist who collaborates in an interdisciplinary manner to increase the value of the initial information becomes greatly necessary [22];
- -
- The metallurgical engineer must shift from the gogglewise knowledge [23] to the fanwise knowledge;
- -
- The global knowledge pattern [24] shall match with the magnitude of the durable (sustainable) knowledge;
- -
- The dissemination of new knowledge must have a multisystem nature;
- -
- The metalworking engineer must contribute to the development and expansion of technological know-how and technological knowledge.
3.3. The Eco–Socio–Technological Paradigm
- -
- It replaces the current techno-technologist paradigms, which are conventional paradigms;
- -
- It predicts a global-type paradigm that can be called the “durable development paradigm”.
- -
- The systemic approach, in which the eco–socio–technological paradigm mega system is appreciated on the basis of interactions between the ecological, economic, social and technological components, so that the impact of one component affects the system as a whole;
- -
- The contingency approach, which states that the objectives can be solved by taking into account either the connections’ intra-system, or between them and the elements of the external environment; in such a framework, it becomes possible to know the methodological tools to characterize the human activated dichotomy—the environment condition.
3.4. The New Materials
3.5. Scientific Branches of Global Knowledge in the Metal Materials Engineering
4. Discussion
- -
- The necessity of transition from specialized industrial branches (metallurgy and environmental engineering) providing conventional materials and services to branches producing efficient and advanced materials, as well as ecomaterials and sociomaterials;
- -
- In case of eco-metallurgy, there are training conditions based on multi- and interdisciplinary knowledge;
- -
- Eco-metallurgy becomes a field that is adaptable to the rigours imposed by two systems: the natural-ecological system and the technological system;
- -
- This discipline brings the metallurgist closer to nature, a modern trend of sustainable development;
- -
- Eco-metallurgy enables the dissemination and knowledge of the rigours convergently imposed by the natural-ecological system and the technological system.
- -
- Streamlining metallurgical product manufacture processes (the economic system and the technological system);
- -
- Optimizing specific consumptions of natural capital under conditions of pollution prevention and control (the natural-ecological system and the technological system).
- -
- The materials are a restricted and sectoral subject, with a particular aim to achieve;
- -
- Almost all situations are focused on the use phase of the life cycle;
- -
- The material is not regarded as an industrial lever that can influence the interactions and inter-conditionings occurring in the convergence zones of the systems;
- -
- The material is not analyzed and evaluated as a tool to help ensure the sustainability and durability of the systems [31].
- -
- Durable materials (a name adopted and adapted in Romanian from the French name durables matteriaux), or;
- -
- Sustainable materials (a name adopted and adapted in Romanian from the English name sustainable materials).
5. Conclusions
- -
- The durable (sustainable) development;
- -
- The global knowledge;
- -
- The eco–socio–technological paradigm.
- -
- Ensuring the durability and sustainability of the natural-ecological system in its dual quality: natural resource provider and collection basin for the pollutant secondary materials;
- -
- Using the multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary integration knowledge to study the interactions of the technological system, the natural-ecological system and the social system.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gajdzik, B.; Grabowska, S.; Saniuk, S.; Wieczorek, T. Sustainable Development and Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Analysis Identifying Key Scientific Problems of the Sustainable Industry 4.0. Energies 2020, 13, 4254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhenwen, L.; Hsi-Chi, Y.; Yan-Chyuan, S. Investigation on Evaluation Framework of Elementary School Teaching Materials for Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3736. [Google Scholar]
- Nana, Z.; Liang, M. Sustainable Development in the Service Industry: Managerial Learning and Management Improvement of Chinese Retailers. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1430. [Google Scholar]
- Lămășanu, P. Romania’s Sustainable Development Strategy 2030; Paideia Emblematic Romania: Bucharest, Romania, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Kesselring, M.; Wagner, F.; Kirsch, M.; Ajjabou, L.; Gloaguen, R. Development of Sustainable Test Sites for Mineral Exploration and Knowledge Spillover for Industry. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martínez, R.; Bednarek, M.; Zulawska, U. Validation of a Sustainable Model for the Mining- Metallurgical Industry in Mexico. In Proceedings of the 5th Ibero-American Congress on Entrepreneurship, Energy, Environment and Technology—CIEEMAT, Portalegre, Portugal, 11–13 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Lukin, E.; Krajnovi´c, A.; Bosna, J. Sustainability Strategies and Achieving SDGs: A Comparative Analysis of Leading Companies in the Automotive Industry. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phei, E.S.; Shanping, J. The Significance of Interdisciplinary Integration in Academic Research and Application. Bio Integr. 2020, 1, 2–5. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, Y. Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 2004, 61, 171–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Chen, X.; Hao, T.; Liu, Z.; Lan, Z. Exploring two decades of research on classroom dialogue by using bibliometric analysis. Comput. Educ. 2019, 137, 12–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicolae, A. The sustainable co-development requires shifting from the “gogglewise” knowledge to “fanwise” knowledge. Acta Tech. Napoc. Ser. Environ. Eng. Sustain. Dev. Entrep. 2014, 3, 17–32. [Google Scholar]
- Nicolae, M.; Dobrescu, C.; Rucai, V.; Nicolae, A. Use of Ecological Paradigm in Material Degradation Engineering. Ann. Dunarea Jos Univ. Galati Fascicle IX Metall. Mater. Sci. 2018, 1, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
- Rapf, M.; Pekgil, G.; Tang, L.; Kranert, M. Entropy Life Cycle Assesment—Practical application and further development. Proc. CIRP 2022, 105, 530–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.; Hua, W. Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 2017, 110, 893–914. [Google Scholar]
- Nicolae, A.; Tudor, P.; Predescu, C.; Licurici, M.; Şerban, V.; Mândru, C.; Calea, G.G.; Ioana, A.; Sohaciu, M.; Semenescu, M.; et al. Dezvoltare Durabilă în Siderurgie Prin Valorificarea Materialelor; Printech: Bucharest, Romania, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Li, W.; Zhao, Y. Bibliometric analysis of global environmental assessment research in a 20-year period. EIA Rev. 2015, 50, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicolae, A.; Nicolae Maria Berbecaru, A.; Predescu, A.; Coman, G. Dezvoltare Durabilo-Sustenabilă în Industria Materialelor Metalice; Printech: Bucharest, Romania, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Roig-Tierno, N.; Gonzalez-Cruz, T.F.; Llopis-Martinez, J. An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis. J. Innov. Knowl. 2017, 2, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
- Ellegaard, O. The application of bibliometric analysis: Disciplinary and user aspects. Scientometrics 2018, 116, 181–202. [Google Scholar]
- Nicolae, A.; Predescu, C.; Nicolae, M. Materiale Durabile (Materiale Sustenabile); Printech: Bucharest, Romania, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, R.; Le Cardinal, J. Exploring the Impacts of Industry 4.0 from a Macroscopic Perspective. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Delft, The Netherlands, 5–8 August 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Danila, A.C.; Nastase, C.E. A bibliometric analysis of the global research on big data for sustainable development. USV Ann. Econ. Public Adm. 2021, 21, 42–49. [Google Scholar]
- Roșca, I.G. Societatea Cunoașterii; Economica: Bucharest, Romania, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Nicolae, A.; Borş, I.; Predescu, C.; Nicolae, M.; Predescu, A.; Şerban, V.; Predescu, A.; Berbcearu, A. Econologie Metalurgică; Printech: Bucharest, Romania, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- What Is IT/OT Convergence? Everything You Need to Know. Available online: https://www.techtarget.com/searchitoperations/definition/IT-OT-convergence (accessed on 6 April 2022).
- Zhao, L.; Yang, M.M.; Wang, Z.; Michelson, G. Trends in the Dynamic Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Leadership: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis. J. Bus. Ethics 2022, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olivetti, E.A.; Cullen, J.M. Toward a sustainable materials system. Science 2018, 360, 1336–1339. [Google Scholar]
- Khasreen, M.M.; Banfill, P.; Menzies, G. Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review. Sustainability 2009, 1, 674–701. [Google Scholar]
- Longo, S.B.; Clark, B.; Shriver, T.E.; Clausen, R. Sustainability and Environmental Sociology: Putting the Economy in its Place and Moving Toward an Integrative Socio-Ecology. Sustainability 2016, 8, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- LE Europe, Spark Legal Network and Consultancy and VVA Consulting, Operational Restrictions in the Retail Sector. 2017. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu (accessed on 6 April 2022).
- Walker, S.; Coleman, N.; Hodgson, P.; Collins, N.; Brimacombe, L. Evaluating the Environmental Dimension of Material Efficiency Strategies Relating to the Circular Economy. Sustainability 2018, 10, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
I. Planning | ||
Steps | Detailing the steps | Comments |
Research subject | Evolution of the metallic materials industry into sustainability | Result: reducing the environmental footprint during the life cycle of the final product. |
Search fields | Title, abstract, keywords, document type, access type | These fields are more representative. |
Fields | Sustainability, Sustainability Industry 4.0 | Assumption: these will show the interconditions of ecology–economy and the correlations between ecology–economy–energy. |
Keywords | Sustainability, Sustainability Industry 4.0, smart factory, smart production, sustainable smart production; | The keywords used were determined on the basis of expert knowledge. |
Databases | Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Google Scholar, sustainable universal principles and legislative parameters | The choice of databases was made according to their size and accessibility. |
Time period | For Sustainability from 2000 to 2021; for Sustainable Industry 4.0 from 2011 to 2022 | Different time periods were used because the domains have different life cycles: higher for “Sustainability” and shorter for “Sustainable Industry 4.0”. |
II. Making | ||
Steps | Detailing the steps | Comments |
Form of search | Manual or automatic | Manual form was used for collection and compilation of data. |
Search results | Sustainability, Sustainability Industry 4.0 | The search results were systematized in four points of the paper, according to the analyzed fields. |
III. Reporting | ||
Steps | Detailing the steps | Comments |
Form of reporting | Description and presentation | New information and additional information about analyzed subject by analyzing particular scientific papers. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Nicolae, M.; Sohaciu, M.G.; Dumitrescu, R.; Ciucă, S.; Nicolae, A. Vectors of Sustainable Development and Global Knowledge in the Metallic Materials Industry in Romania. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169911
Nicolae M, Sohaciu MG, Dumitrescu R, Ciucă S, Nicolae A. Vectors of Sustainable Development and Global Knowledge in the Metallic Materials Industry in Romania. Sustainability. 2022; 14(16):9911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169911
Chicago/Turabian StyleNicolae, Maria, Mirela Gabriela Sohaciu, Ruxandra Dumitrescu, Sorin Ciucă, and Avram Nicolae. 2022. "Vectors of Sustainable Development and Global Knowledge in the Metallic Materials Industry in Romania" Sustainability 14, no. 16: 9911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169911
APA StyleNicolae, M., Sohaciu, M. G., Dumitrescu, R., Ciucă, S., & Nicolae, A. (2022). Vectors of Sustainable Development and Global Knowledge in the Metallic Materials Industry in Romania. Sustainability, 14(16), 9911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169911