Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Ultrasonic-Assisted Enzymatic Extraction of Freeze-Dried Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Berry Oil Using Response Surface Methodology
Previous Article in Journal
Analytical Enumeration of Redundant Data Anomalies in Energy Consumption Readings of Smart Buildings with a Case Study of Darmstadt Smart City in Germany
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Electric Vehicle Owners’ Perception of Remanufactured Batteries: An Empirical Study in China

Sustainability 2022, 14(17), 10846; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710846
by Kenichiro Chinen 1, Mitsutaka Matsumoto 2,*, Pingsheng Tong 1, Yongliang Stanley Han 1 and Kuei-Hsien Jeff Niu 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2022, 14(17), 10846; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710846
Submission received: 7 August 2022 / Revised: 26 August 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Sustainable Transportation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper analyzes Chinese EV users' intention to use remanufactured batteries considering cost consciousness, perceived risk, and perceived benefit. As the authors mentioned, the promotion of remanufactured batteries can be considered important since waste batteries will be a severe problem. The content of the paper is timely and gives us insights from a practical view. Since the paper is well written, but I found some typos, I recommend "minor revision."

 

1. Abbreviations: 

  Line 44: I didn't find "NEV" after this line. Please delete the abbreviation.

Line 109, 111, and 156: HPC, LPC and CLSCs need to be explained.

2. Line 432: typos

Author Response

Please refer to the attached file for the reply to the reviewer. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The article is clear, understandable and well structured. Data sample representative, hypotheses clear and understandable. It is appropriate to add language proofreading.

Author Response

Please refer to the attached file for the reply to the reviewer. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please refer to the attached file for the reply to the reviewer. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

All the comments are addressed. Hence, the paper can be accepted in its present form.

Back to TopTop