Next Article in Journal
Chlorination Treatment for Gold Extraction from Refractory Gold-Copper-Arsenic-Bearing Concentrates
Previous Article in Journal
Strategy Design and Performance Analysis of an Electromechanical Flywheel Hybrid Scheme for Electric Vehicles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fuelwood in South Africa Revisited: Widespread Use in a Policy Vacuum

Department of Environmental Science, Rhodes University, Makhanda 6140, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(17), 11018; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711018
Submission received: 10 July 2022 / Revised: 11 August 2022 / Accepted: 31 August 2022 / Published: 3 September 2022

Abstract

South Africa has experienced massive urbanisation and socioeconomic development over the past two decades. Concomitantly, the national energy policy focuses on the provision of modern fuels, notably electricity, for domestic use. Given this policy environment and socioeconomic development, we examine pertinent literature and policies from South Africa on fuelwood use, value, and sustainability to understand how it might have changed in tandem with the national shifts in urbanisation and socioeconomic development over the last 20 years. Recent literature shows that fuelwood is still used to some extent by 96% of rural households and 69% of low-income urban ones. We also estimate that the use of fuelwood by rural households alone is valued at approximately ZAR 10.5 billion (approx. USD 700 million) annually, with the probability of an equally high value to low-income urban households. However, despite the extensive use and high value, our analysis of cognate national policies related to energy, forestry, environment, and social development, show that fuelwood and its use is hardly considered, indicating a policy vacuum. This policy vacuum means that there is no strategic or apposite support or interventions in any localised areas where fuelwood demand might exceed supply, thereby undermining the livelihoods and energy security of affected citizens, most notably the poor.
Keywords: biomass; fuelwood; policy; poverty; rural; South Africa; urban biomass; fuelwood; policy; poverty; rural; South Africa; urban

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shackleton, C.; Sinasson, G.; Adeyemi, O.; Martins, V. Fuelwood in South Africa Revisited: Widespread Use in a Policy Vacuum. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711018

AMA Style

Shackleton C, Sinasson G, Adeyemi O, Martins V. Fuelwood in South Africa Revisited: Widespread Use in a Policy Vacuum. Sustainability. 2022; 14(17):11018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shackleton, Charlie, Gisele Sinasson, Opeyemi Adeyemi, and Vusumzi Martins. 2022. "Fuelwood in South Africa Revisited: Widespread Use in a Policy Vacuum" Sustainability 14, no. 17: 11018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711018

APA Style

Shackleton, C., Sinasson, G., Adeyemi, O., & Martins, V. (2022). Fuelwood in South Africa Revisited: Widespread Use in a Policy Vacuum. Sustainability, 14(17), 11018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711018

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop