Evaluating Electronic Customer Relationship Management System Success: The Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Gaps in e-CRM System Literature
3. Research Model and Hypotheses Development
3.1. Customer Satisfaction
3.2. Trust
3.3. Level of Service Quality
3.4. Technological Readiness
3.5. Privacy
3.6. COVID-19
3.7. Customer Pressure
3.8. Success of Electronic Customer Relationship Management (e-CRM)
4. Research Methodology
4.1. Survey Instrument
4.2. Sample and Data Collection
4.2.1. Data Collection Procedure and Sample Data
4.2.2. Sample Profile
5. Data Analysis and Result
5.1. Measurement Model
5.2. Structural Model
6. Discussion of Results
7. Conclusions
8. Research and Managerial Implications
9. Limitations and Directions for Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Measurements and Sources of Research Constructs
Construct (Source) | Code | Measurement for Each Construct |
Technological Readiness [79,85] | TD1 | “I have the resources and technological infrastructure for e-CRM usage”. |
TD2 | “The process of e-CRM services usage is (might be) simple for me”. | |
TD3 | “I have the technological knowledge for e-CRM usage”. | |
Privacy [8] | PV1 | “I believe that the organization’s site should provide a privacy statement to assure that customer information is treated as confidential”. |
PV2 | “I believe that it is important to provide third-party verification (e.g., seal of approval) to prove to customers that the organization’s website is authentic”. | |
PV3 | “I believe that the organization’s online service does not share personal information of customers with other sites”. | |
COVID-19 [126,127] | CO1 | “The use of e-CRM services makes me less concerned about the complications related to COVID-19”. |
CO2 | “The use of e-CRM services decreases the spread of COVID-19 virus”. | |
CO3 | “The use of e-CRM services prevents me from spreading COVID-19 virus; I could practice social distancing and reduce my outside movements”. | |
CO4 | “E-CRM helps public authorities fight COVID-19 virus”. | |
CO5 | “E-CRM allows me to safeguard myself from COVID-19 virus infection”. | |
Customer Pressure [128] | CP1 | “Consumers (customers) demand safe and environmentally friendly products”. |
CP2 | “Consumers (customers) are increasingly selective on whether or not the products are environmentally friendly”. | |
CP3 | “Consumers (customers) are more likely to choose products of responsible enterprises”. | |
CP4 | “Consumers (customers) will report a company if it is not environmentally and socially responsible”. | |
Trust [129] | TR1 | “I believe that the organization should send a confirmation of secure payment and transmission on a regular basis”. |
TR2 | “I am comfortable giving out sensitive information like my credit card/debit card numbers for online payments”. | |
TR3 | “I believe that the terms and conditions that the organization presents are reasonable and customer friendly”. | |
Level of Service Quality [130] | SQ1 | “The organization’s site allows me to quickly complete a transaction”. |
SQ2 | “The site tells what steps to take if my transaction is not processed”. | |
SQ3 | “I believe that the reputation of organization is important especially regarding security”. | |
Customer Satisfaction [131] | CS1 | “Consumers feel satisfied with the services by this organization”. |
CS2 | “Consumers feel satisfied with the responses of the staff and the quick online services”. | |
CS3 | “Consumers feel satisfied with the online financial services advice”. | |
CS4 | “Overall, this organization provides excellent online service quality”. | |
Success of E-CRM System [132,133,134,135,136,137] | E-CRM1 | “Complaints (suggestive) encourages sharing of problems by customers”. |
E-CRM2 | “The needs of customers should be reviewed and responses should be personalized”. | |
E-CRM3 | “The available technical personnel are good at providing technical support in computer technology usage in building customer relationships”. | |
E-CRM4 | “This organization uses the right software in serving customers”. | |
E-CRM5 | “Customer complaints (responsiveness) are quickly solved”. |
References
- Yang, Z.; Babapour, H. Critical Variables for Assessing the Effectiveness of Electronic Customer Relationship Management Systems in Online Shopping. Kybernetes 2022. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birtus, M.; Lăzăroiu, G. The Neurobehavioral Economics of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Consumer Cognition, Perception, Sentiment, Choice, and Decision-Making. Anal. Metaphys. 2021, 20, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khanh, C.N.T.; Phong, L.T.; Cao, K.D. The Impact of Organizational Factors on E-CRM Success Implementation. VINE J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. Syst. 2021, 52, 612–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grewal, R.; Lilien, G.L.; Bharadwaj, S.; Jindal, P.; Kayande, U.; Lusch, R.F.; Mantrala, M.; Palmatier, R.W.; Rindfleisch, A.; Scheer, L.K.; et al. Business-to-Business Buying: Challenges and Opportunities. Cust. Needs Solut. 2015, 2, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almajali, D.; Hammouri, Q.; Majali, T.; Al-Gasawneh, J.A.; Dahalin, Z.M. Antecedents of Consumers’ Adoption of Electronic Commerce in Developing Countries. Int. J. Data Netw. Sci. 2021, 5, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehraj, D.; Qureshi, I.H. Determinants of Green Marketing Mix in Developing Economies: Conceptualisation and Scale Validation Approach. Bus. Strateg. Dev. 2020, 3, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Shammari, M.M.; AlShowaikh, A.F. Investigating User Satisfaction of Customer Relationship Management in A Telecommunications Company in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Int. J. Ebus. eGov. Stud. 2021, 13, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almajali, D.; Lfityani, A.A.; Maali, H.; Almajali, H. Critical Success Factors for Assessing the Effectiveness of E-CRM Systems in Online Shopping: The Mediating Role of User Satisfaction. Uncertain Supply Chain. Manag. 2022, 10, 667–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Mokha, A.K.; Pattnaik, S.C. Electronic Customer Relationship Management (E-CRM), Customer Experience and Customer Satisfaction: Evidence from the Banking Industry. Benchmarking 2022, 29, 551–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Dmour, H.H.; Algharabat, R.S.; Khawaja, R.; Al-Dmour, R.H. Investigating the Impact of ECRM Success Factors on Business Performance: Jordanian Commercial Banks. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2019, 31, 105–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.; Alshawi, S.; Ali, M.A.A. Potential Impact of Cultural Differences on Electronic Customer Relationship Management (ECRM) Systems. In Proceedings of the AMCIS 2004 Proceedings, New York, NY, USA, 6–8 August 2004; p. 487. Available online: http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2004 (accessed on 5 January 2022).
- Ghalenooie, M.B.; Sarvestani, H.K. Evaluating Human Factors in Customer Relationship Management Case Study: Private Banks of Shiraz City. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2016, 36, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galvão, M.B.; de Carvalho, R.C.; de Oliveira, L.A.B.; de Medeiros, D.D. Customer Loyalty Approach Based on CRM for SMEs. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2018, 33, 706–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- San-Martín, S.; Jiménez, N.H.; López-Catalán, B. The Firms Benefits of Mobile CRM from the Relationship Marketing Approach and the TOE Model. Span. J. Mark. ESIC 2016, 20, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kimiloǧlu, H.; Zarali, H. What Signifies Success in E-CRM? Mark. Intell. Plan. 2009, 27, 246–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdil, A.; Öztürk, A. Improvement A Quality Oriented Model for Customer Relationship Management: A Case Study for Shipment Industry in Turkey. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 229, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishna, G.J.; Ravi, V. Evolutionary Computing Applied to Customer Relationship Management: A Survey. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2016, 56, 30–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mang’unyi, E.E.; Khabala, O.T.; Govender, K.K. Bank Customer Loyalty and Satisfaction: The Influence of Virtual e-CRM. Afr. J. Econ. Manag. Stud. 2018, 9, 250–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almajali, D.; Al-Okaily, M.; Barakat, S.; Al-Zegaier, H.; Dahalin, Z.M. Students’ Perceptions of the Sustainability of Distance Learning Systems in the Post-COVID-19: A Qualitative Perspective. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Will the COVID-19 Pandemic Lead to Long-Term Consumer Perceptions, Behavioral Intentions, and Acquisition Decisions? Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2021, 16, 70. [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Zhou, C.F.; Chen, Y.W. Determinants of E-CRM in Influencing Customer Satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 9th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Guilin, China, 7–11 August 2006; pp. 767–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romano, N.C.; Fjermestad, J. Electronic Commerce Customer Relationship Management: A Research Agenda. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2003, 4, 233–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahdavi, I.; Cho, N.; Shirazi, B.; Sahebjamnia, N. Designing Evolving User Profile in E-CRM with Dynamic Clustering of Web Documents. Data Knowl. Eng. 2008, 65, 355–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, K.; Trück, S. Electricity Markets around the World. J. Commod. Mark. 2018, 9, 77–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soltani, Z.; Navimipour, N.J. Customer Relationship Management Mechanisms: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature and Recommendations for Future Research. Comput. Human Behav. 2016, 61, 667–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Weshah, G.A.; Al-Manasrah, E.; Al-Qatawneh, M. Customer Relationship Management Systems and Organizational Performance: Quantitative Evidence from the Jordanian Telecommunication Industry. J. Mark. Commun. 2019, 25, 799–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, X. Analysing Customer Behaviour in Mobile App Usage. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017, 117, 425–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alshawi, S.; Missi, F.; Irani, Z. Organisational, Technical and Data Quality Factors in CRM Adoption—SMEs Perspective. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2011, 40, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faed, A.; Radmand, P.; Talevski, A. The Critical Success Factors for Implementation of CRM and Knowledge Management in a Work Setting. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing, Fukuoka, Japan, 4–6 November 2010; pp. 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milan, G.S.; Slongo, L.A.; Eberle, L.; De Toni, D.; Bebber, S. Determinants of Customer Loyalty: A Study with Customers of a Brazilian Bank. Benchmarking 2018, 25, 3935–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reichheld, F.F. Learning from Customer Defections. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1996, 74, 56–69. [Google Scholar]
- Philips kotler, K.L.K. Marketing Management; Pearson Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; p. 833. [Google Scholar]
- Rashwan, H.H.M.; Mansi, A.L.M.; Hassan, H.E. The Impact of the E-CRM (Expected Security and Convenience of Website Design) on E- Loyalty Field Study on Commercial Banks. J. Bus. Retail Manag. Res. 2019, 14, 106–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, R.; Sethi, V.; Shastri, S. An Empirical Study on Influence of E-CRM towards Customer Loyalty in Banking Sector. Int. J. Public Sect. Perform. Manag. 2020, 6, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, J.; Kaur, B. The Influence of E-CRM Competitive Advantage on e-CRM Performance in the Indian Banking Industry. Strateg. Chang. 2016, 25, 537–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mbama, C.I.; Ezepue, P.O. Digital Banking, Customer Experience and Bank Financial Performance: UK Customers’ Perceptions. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2018, 36, 230–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, R.; Rahman, Z.; Qureshi, M.N. Measuring Customer Experience in Banks: Scale Development and Validation. J. Model. Manag. 2014, 9, 87–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mulyono, H.; Helmi, S.; Situmorang, S.H. E-CRM and Loyalty: A Mediation Effect of Customer Experience and Satisfaction in Online Transportation of Indonesia. Acad. J. Econ. Stud. 2018, 4, 96–105. [Google Scholar]
- Zaim, H.; Ramdani, M.; Haddi, A. E-CRM Success Factors as Determinants of Customer Satisfaction Rate in Retail Website. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. Ind. Manag. Appl. 2020, 12, 82–092. [Google Scholar]
- Harrigan, P.; Ramsey, E.; Ibbotson, P. E-CRM in SMEs: An Exploratory Study in Northern Ireland. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2008, 26, 385–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortega, B.H.; Martínez, J.J.; De Hoyos, M.J.M. The Role of Information Technology Knowledge in B2B Development. Int. J. E-Bus. Res. 2008, 4, 40–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrigan, P.; Ramsey, E.; Ibbotson, P. Critical Factors Underpinning the E-CRM Activities of SMEs. J. Mark. Manag. 2011, 27, 503–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Letaifa, S.B.; Perrien, J. The Impact of E-CRM on Organisational and Individual Behavior: The Effect of the Remuneration and Reward System. Int. J. E-Bus. Res. 2007, 3, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lock Teng, K.L.; Ching, P.W. The Use of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) by Manufacturing Firms in Different Industries: A Malaysian Survey. Int. J. Manag. 2007, 24, 386. [Google Scholar]
- Hamid, N.R.A. E-CRM: Are We There Yet? J. Am. Acad. Bus. Camb. 2005, 6, 3–7. [Google Scholar]
- Jayachandran, S.; Sharma, S.; Kaufman, P.; Raman, P. The Role of Relational Information Processes and Technology Use in Customer Relationship Management. J. Mark. 2005, 69, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shoniregun, C.A.; Omoegun, A.; Brown-West, D.; Logvynovskiy, O. Can ECRM and Trust Improve ECustomer Base? In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on e-Commerce Technology, San Diego, CA, USA, 9 July 2004; pp. 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalifa, M.; Shen, K.N. Modelling Electronic Customer Relationship Management Success: Functional and Temporal Considerations. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2009, 28, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, R.H.; Lin, R.J.; Yang, P.C. The Relationships between Ecrm, Innovation, and Customer Value—An Empirical Study. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Summer Conference of Asia Pacific Business Innovation and Technology Management, Dalian, China, 10–12 July 2011; pp. 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, X.; Nguyen, B.; Han, S.H.; Chen, C.H.S.; Li, F. Electronic CRM and Perceptions of Unfairness. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2015, 16, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, B.; Simkin, L. The Dark Side of CRM: Advantaged and Disadvantaged Customers. J. Consum. Mark. 2013, 30, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navimipour, N.J.; Soltani, Z. The Impact of Cost, Technology Acceptance and Employees’ Satisfaction on the Effectiveness of the Electronic Customer Relationship Management Systems. Comput. Human Behav. 2016, 55, 1052–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taherdoost, H. A Review of Technology Acceptance and Adoption Models and Theories. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 22, 960–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Chen, D.; Lai, F. Technological-Personal-Environmental (TPE) Framework: A Conceptual Model for Technology Acceptance at the Individual Level. J. Int. Technol. Inf. Manag. 2010, 19, 5. [Google Scholar]
- Ismail, N.A.B.; Hussin, H.B. The Effect of E-CRM Features on Customers Satisfaction for Airline E-Ticket Services in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the 2016 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for The Muslim World (ICT4M), Jakarta, Indonesia, 22–24 November 2016; pp. 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, I.L.; Hung, C.Y. A Strategy-Based Process for Effectively Determining System Requirements in ECRM Development. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2009, 51, 1308–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heidemann, J.; Klier, M.; Landherr, A.; Zimmermann, S. The Optimal Level of CRM IT Investments. Electron. Mark. 2012, 23, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahab, S.; Nor, A.M.; Al-Momani, K. The Relationship between E- Service Quality and Ease of Use on Electronic Customer Relationship Management (E-CRM) Performance: An Empirical Investigation in Jordan Mobile Phone Services. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, Sanya, China, 22–24 January 2010; pp. 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmoud, M.A.; Hinson, R.E.; Adika, M.K. The Effect of Trust, Commitment, and Conflict Handling on Customer Retention: The Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction. J. Relatsh. Mark. 2018, 17, 257–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dwyer, F.R.; Schurr, P.H.; Oh, S. Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships. J. Mark. 1987, 51, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kokthi, E.; Thoma, L.; Saary, R.; Kelemen-Erdos, A. Disconfirmation of Taste as a Measure of Trust in Brands: An Experimental Study on Mineral Water. Foods 2022, 11, 1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hwang, Y. The Impact of Uncertainty Avoidance, Social Norms and Innovativeness on Trust and Ease of Use in Electronic Customer Relationship Management. Electron. Mark. 2009, 19, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darajeh, M.R.; Tahajod, M. Benefits of E-CRM for Financial Services Providers. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Financial Theory and Engineering, ICFTE 2010, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 18–20 June 2010; pp. 95–98. [Google Scholar]
- Hopkins, E.; Potcovaru, A.M. Consumer Attitudes, Values, Needs, and Expectations Due to COVID-19. Anal. Metaphys. 2021, 20, 202–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.-M.; Vargo, S.L. Rethinking Social CRM Design: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective. In Handbook of Strategic e-Business Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 767–784. [Google Scholar]
- Huppertz, J.W.; Arenson, S.J.; Evans, R.H. An Application of Equity Theory to Buyer-Seller Exchange Situations. J. Mark. Res. 1978, 15, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaiyeoba, O.O.; Chimbise, T.T.; Roberts-Lombard, M. E-Service Usage and Satisfaction in Botswana. Afr. J. Econ. Manag. Stud. 2018, 9, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L.L.; Parasuraman, A. The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality. J. Mark. 1996, 60, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rust, R.T.; Zahorik, A.J. Customer Satisfaction, Customer Retention, and Market Share. J. Retail. 1993, 69, 193–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Love, P.; Edwards, D.J.; Standing, C.; Irani, Z. Beyond the Red Queen Syndrome: CRM Technology and Building Material Suppliers. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2009, 16, 459–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendoza, L.E.; Marius, A.; Pérez, M.; Grimán, A.C. Critical Success Factors for a Customer Relationship Management Strategy. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2007, 49, 913–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almajali, D.A.; Omar, F.; Alsokkar, A.; Alsherideh, A.S.; Masa’Deh, R.; Dahalin, Z. Enterprise Resource Planning Success in Jordan from the Perspective of IT-Business Strategic Alignment. Cogent Soc. Sci. 2022, 8, 2062095. Available online: http://www.editorialmanager.com/cogentsocsci (accessed on 6 March 2022). [CrossRef]
- Grimson, J.; Grimson, W.; Hasselbring, W. The SI Challenge in Health Care. Commun. ACM 2000, 43, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, P.-C. EFL Student Learning Style Preferences and Attitudes toward Technology-Integrated Instruction; University of South Dakota: Vermillion, South Dakota, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Lucchetti, R.; Sterlacchini, A. The Adoption of ICT among SMEs: Evidence from an Italian Survey. Small Bus. Econ. 2004, 23, 151–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sin, L.Y.M.; Tse, A.C.B.; Yim, F.H.K. CRM: Conceptualization and Scale Development. Eur. J. Mark. 2005, 39, 1264–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chalmeta, R. Methodology for Customer Relationship Management. J. Syst. Softw. 2006, 79, 1015–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu-Shanab, E.; Anagreh, L. Impact of Electronic Customer Relationship Management in Banking Sector. Int. J. Electron. Cust. Relatsh. Manag. 2015, 9, 254–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Thong, J.Y.L.; Xu, X. Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2012, 36, 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almajali: IT–Business Strategic Alignment Gap and Google Scholar. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=2010&pages=394-405&conference=Proceeding+of+the+15+IBIMA+conference+on+innovation+and+knowledge+management+in+Business%3A+A+Business+Competitive+Edge+Perspective&author=D.+Almajali&author=Z.+Dahalin&title=IT-business+strategic+alignment+gap+and+sustainable+competitive+advantage+in+Jordan%3A+Triangulation+approach (accessed on 15 September 2022).
- Rydell, L.; Suler, P. Underlying Values That Motivate Behavioral Intentions and Purchase Decisions: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Anal. Metaphys. 2021, 20, 116–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frimpong, K.; Shuridah, O.; Wilson, A.; Sarpong, F. A Cross-National Investigation of Trait Antecedents of Mobile-Banking Adoption. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 2020, 62, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatt, A.; Bhatt, S. Factors Affecting Customers Adoption of Mobile Banking Services. J. Internet Bank. Commer. 2016, 21, 161. [Google Scholar]
- Archibugi, D.; Coco, A. A New Indicator of Technological Capabilities for Developed and Developing Countries (ArCo). World Dev. 2004, 32, 629–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerlach, J.M.; Lutz, J.K.T. Evidence on Usage Behavior and Future Adoption Intention of Fintechs and Digital Finance Solutions. Int. J. Bus. Financ. Res. 2019, 13, 83–105. [Google Scholar]
- Oliveira, T.; Martins, M.F. Understanding E-Business Adoption across Industries in European Countries. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2010, 110, 1337–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kundu, S.; Datta, S.K. Impact of Trust on the Relationship of E-Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction. EuroMed J. Bus. 2015, 10, 21–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kassim, N.; Asiah Abdullah, N. The Effect of Perceived Service Quality Dimensions on Customer Satisfaction, Trust, and Loyalty in e-Commerce Settings: A Cross Cultural Analysis. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2010, 22, 351–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, C.H.; Kim, Y.G. Identifying Key Factors Affecting Consumer Purchase Behavior in an Online Shopping Context. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2003, 31, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eid, M.I. Determinants of E-Commerce Customer Satisfaction, Trust, and Loyalty in Saudi Arabia. J. Electron. Commer. Res. JECR 2011, 12, 78. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Bashayreh, M.; Almajali, D.; Altamimi, A.; Masa’deh, R.E.; Al-Okaily, M. An Empirical Investigation of Reasons Influencing Student Acceptance and Rejection of Mobile Learning Apps Usage. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Update. Available online: https://www.who.int/bangladesh/emergencies/coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-update (accessed on 16 January 2022).
- World Trade Organization. Trade Set to Plunge as COVID-19 Pandemic Upends Global Economy; World Trade Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
- Fu, J.; Mishra, M. Fintech in the Time of COVID-19: Trust and Technological Adoption during Crises. Swiss Financ. Inst. Res. Pap. 2020, 12, 1–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chong, S. Success in Electronic Commerce Implementation: A Cross-Country Study of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2008, 21, 468–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasani, T.; Bojei, J.; Dehghantanha, A. Investigating the Antecedents to the Adoption of SCRM Technologies by Start-up Companies. Telemat. Inform. 2017, 34, 655–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gualandris, J.; Kalchschmidt, M. Customer Pressure and Innovativeness: Their Role in Sustainable Supply Chain Management. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2014, 20, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ueki, Y. Customer Pressure, Customer-Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships, and Quality Control Performance. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 2233–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maduku, D.K.; Mpinganjira, M.; Duh, H. Understanding Mobile Marketing Adoption Intention by South African SMEs: A Multi-Perspective Framework. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 2016, 36, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mangula, I. A Meta-Analysis of IT Innovation Adoption Factors: The Moderating Effect of Product and Process Innovations Diffusion of SaaS Adoption View Project. 2017. Available online: http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2017 (accessed on 2 May 2022).
- Pan, S.L.; Lee, J.N. Using E-CRM for a Unified View of the Customer. Commun. ACM 2003, 46, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zablah, A.R.; Bellenger, D.N.; Johnston, W.J. An Evaluation of Divergent Perspectives on Customer Relationship Management: Towards a Common Understanding of an Emerging Phenomenon. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2004, 33, 475–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, H.H. Critical Factors and Benefits in the Implementation of Customer Relationship Management. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2007, 18, 483–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, A.; Machova, V. Consumer Tastes, Sentiments, Attitudes, and Behaviors Related to COVID-19. Anal. Metaphys. 2021, 20, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamid, N.R.A.; Kassim, N. Internet Technology as a Tool in Customer Relationship Management. J. Am. Acad. Bus. 2004, 4, 103–108. [Google Scholar]
- Strauss, J.; Ansary, A.I.; Frost, R. E-Marketing; Routledge: London, UK, 2006; p. 456. [Google Scholar]
- Kangu, M.A. The Role of Customer Relationship Management Dimensions on Customer Loyalty in the Hotel Industry in Kenya Maureen Adhiambo, COHRED; JKUAT: Juja, Kenya, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Klein, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th ed.; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2016; Volume 8. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F. Research Methods for Business. Educ. Train. 2007, 49, 336–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newkirk, H.E.; Lederer, A.L. The Effectiveness of Strategic Information Systems Planning under Environmental Uncertainty. Inf. Manag. 2006, 43, 481–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.; Anderson, R.; Black, B.; Babin, B. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2016; ISBN 9780133792683. [Google Scholar]
- Weyant, E. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. J. Electron. Resour. Med. Libr. 2022, 19, 54–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albert, T.C.; Goes, P.B.; Gupta, A. Gist: A Model for Design and Management of Content and Interactivity of Customer-Centric Web Sites. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2004, 28, 161–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Seyedian, M. Contextual Marketing and Customer-Orientation Strategy for E-Commerce: An Empirical Analysis. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2003, 8, 95–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.S.; Tsou, H.T. Performance Effects of IT Capability, Service Process Innovation, and the Mediating Role of Customer Service. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. JET-M 2012, 29, 71–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jukic, N.; Jukic, B.; Meamber, L.A.; Nezlek, G. Implementing Polyinstantiation as a Strategy for Electronic Commerce Customer Relationship Management. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2002, 7, 9–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, P.C.; Conklin, B. The Balancing Act: The Role of Transnational Habitus and Social Networks in Balancing Transnational Entrepreneurial Activities. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2009, 33, 1045–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boulding, W.; Staelin, R.; Ehret, M.; Johnston, W.J. A Customer Relationship Management Roadmap: What Is Known, Potential Pitfalls, and Where to Go. J. Mark. 2005, 69, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrigan, P.; Ramsey, E.; Ibbotson, P. Exploring and Explaining SME Marketing: Investigating e-CRM Using a Mixed Methods Approach. J. Strateg. Mark. 2012, 20, 127–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.S.; Ching, R.K.H. The Effects of Information and Communication Technology on Customer Relationship Management and Customer Lock-In. Int. J. Electron. Bus. 2007, 5, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawson-Body, A.; O’Keefe, T.P. Interorganizational Relationships in the Context of SMEs’ B2B e-Commerce. J. Electron. Commer. Organ. 2006, 4, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Somali, S.A.; Gholami, R.; Clegg, B. Determinants of B2B E-Commerce Adoption in Saudi Arabian Firms. Int. J. Digit. Soc. 2011, 2, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sophonthummapharn, K. The Adoption of Techno-Relationship Innovations: A Framework for Electronic Customer Relationship Management. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2009, 27, 380–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walrave, M.; Waeterloos, C.; Ponnet, K. Adoption of a Contact Tracing App for Containing COVID-19: A Health Belief Model Approach. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020, 6, e20572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Luo, S.; Xie, Y.; Liu, F.; Li, X.; Zhou, Z. Factors Influencing Patients’ Intentions to Use Diabetes Management Apps Based on an Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model: Web-Based Survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 2019, 21, e15023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berns, M.; Hopkins, M.S.; Townend, A.; Khayat, Z.; Balagopal, B.; Reeves, M. The Business of Sustainability: What It Means To Managers Now. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2009, 51, 20–26. [Google Scholar]
- Aniba, N.; Makhmali, H.; Qteishat, M.; Siddiqi, J.; Akhgar, B. The Role of Trust in E-CRM: An Empirical Study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering (IKE) 2011, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 18–21 July 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V.A.; Malhotra, A. ES-QUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality. J. Serv. Res. 2005, 7, 213–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amin, M.; Isa, Z. An Examination of the Relationship between Service Quality Perception and Customer Satisfaction: A SEM Approach towards Malaysian Islamic Banking. Int. J. Islam. Middle East. Financ. Manag. 2008, 1, 191–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yim, F.H.K.; Anderson, R.E.; Swaminathan, S. Customer Relationship Management: Its Dimensions and Effect on Customer Outcomes. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 2004, 24, 263–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee-Kelley, L.; Gilbert, D.; Mannicom, R. How E-CRM Can Enhance Customer Loyalty. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2003, 21, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Madadha, A.; Al-Adwan, A.S.; Zakzouk, F.A. Organisational Culture and Organisational Citizenship Behaviour: The Dark Side of Organisational Politics. Organizacija 2021, 54, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khdour, N.; Al-Adwan, A.S.; Alsoud, A.; Al-Douri, J.A. Human Resource Management Practices and Total Quality Management in Insurance Companies: Evidence from Jordan. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2021, 19, 432–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasir, J.; Ibrahim, R.M.; Sarwar, M.A.; Sarwar, B.; Al-Rahmi, W.M.; Alturise, F.; Samed Al-Adwan, A.; Uddin, M. The Effects of Transformational Leadership, Organizational Innovation, Work Stressors, and Creativity on Employee Performance in SMEs. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 772104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Madadha, A.; Al-Adwan, A.S.; Alrousan, M.K.; Jalghoum, Y.A. Organisational Climate and Team Performance: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment at Jordanian Pharmaceutical Companies. Int. J. Manag. Pract. 2019, 12, 228–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Author | Independent Variable | Dependent Variable | Gaps | Gap Resolution |
---|---|---|---|---|
[47] | E-CRM value Trust value | E-commerce improvement | Trust impact was neglected | Trust impact on the success of E-CRM was examined |
[15] | Internal business perspective Innovation and learning perspectives Financial perspectives Customer perspective | E-CRM performance | Performance of E-CRM was measured from the perspective of firm only | Performance of E-CRM was measured from the perspective of customers |
[48] | Pre-purchase E-CRM At-purchase E-CRM Post-purchase E-CRM | Satisfaction of online customer | Service quality was ignored | Highlighted the need to cover the aspect of quality service |
[49] | E-CRM | Product image value Personnel service value Innovation capability | No consideration towards the factors that have impact on E-CRM | Several factors with impact on E-CRM were examined |
[50] | Differential treatment | Communication Attitudes toward the fairness of firm’s E-CRM Re-patronage intentions Price consciousness Perceived service quality | Lower points increase trust | Trust within E-CRM was deliberated with customers being considered individually |
[51] | Price Service Communication Customization Reputation Responsiveness | CRM offerings | The subjects of privacy and trust were disregarded | The subjects of privacy and trust were adequately discussed |
[9] | Purchase cycle Post-booking Customer service Promotion Web features | Loyalty Customer satisfaction | The online features with potential impact on customer satisfaction were not considered | E-trust was thoroughly examined |
[52] | Technical support Organizational culture Organizational strategy Organizational flexibility Innovation Ease of use E-learning systems Infrastructure capabilities | Technology acceptance Cost Employee satisfaction Effectiveness of E-CRM | E-CRM’s effectiveness was only measured from the viewpoint of the employees, neglecting the viewpoint of customers | E-CRM’s effectiveness was measured from the viewpoint of customers |
[35] | Competitive advantage of E-CRM using tools and techniques of E-CRM | Innovation and learning perspective Financial perspective Customer perspective Internal business perspective | Factors that impact E-CRM were not addressed | Some factors that impact E-CRM were addressed |
[37] | E-CRM effect Information quality System quality | E-service quality User satisfaction Net benefits Organization impact Individual impact | Online features with potential impact on customer satisfaction were not considered | E-trust was adequately discussed |
[18] | E-CRM Pre-service features At-service features Post-service features | Customer satisfaction Customer loyalty | There was no consideration towards the issue of privacy despite its potential impact on customer satisfaction | The issue of privacy was amply discussed |
[10] | ECRM success factors | Customer satisfaction Customer retention Financial performance Customer trust | Success factors of E-CRM were not measured | Some success factors of E-CRM were measured |
[8] | Training, system quality, security and access to information | Effectiveness of E-CRM on online shopping | The implementation of E-CRM is still low | Some success factors of E-CRM were measured |
Model | x² | Df | P | x²/df | IFI | TLI | GFI | CFI | RMSEA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Initial Estimation | 1129.112 | 441 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.134 |
Final model | 521.121 | 377 | 0.00 | 1.38 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.073 |
Constructs and Indicators | Factor Loadings | Standard Error | Error Variance | Cronbach’s Alpha | Composite Reliability * | AVE ** |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Technological Readiness (TD) | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.91 | |||
TD1 | 0.774 | 0.136 | 0.180 | |||
TD2 | 0.775 | 0.123 | 0.140 | |||
TD3 | 0.779 | 0.138 | 0.380 | |||
Privacy (PV) | 0.92 | 0.71 | 0.87 | |||
PV2 | 0.757 | 0.081 | 0.750 | |||
PV3 | 0.761 | 0.191 | 0.200 | |||
COVID-19 (CO) | 0.94 | 0.87 | 0.63 | |||
CO1 | 0.871 | 0.056 | 0.440 | |||
CO2 | 0.850 | 0.059 | 0.620 | |||
CO3 | 0.861 | 0.061 | 0.330 | |||
CO4 | 0.833 | 0.064 | 0.300 | |||
Customer Pressure (CP) | 0.93 | 0.80 | 0.84 | |||
CP2 | 0.640 | 0.072 | 0.430 | |||
CP3 | 0.812 | 0.076 | 0.410 | |||
CP4 | 0.840 | 0.081 | 0.510 | |||
Trust (TR) | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.84 | |||
TR1 | 0.723 | 0.064 | 0.510 | |||
TR2 | 0.711 | 0.066 | 0.330 | |||
TR3 | 0.751 | 0.067 | 0.340 | |||
Level of Service Quality (SQ) | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.66 | |||
SQ1 | 0.745 | 0.176 | 0.210 | |||
SQ2 | 0.779 | 0.051 | 0.570 | |||
SQ3 | 0.901 | 0.052 | 0.230 | |||
Customer Satisfaction (CS) | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.50 | |||
CS1 | 0.723 | 0.077 | 0.440 | |||
CS2 | 0.715 | 0.090 | 0.660 | |||
CS3 | 0.667 | 0.075 | 0.410 | |||
CS4 | 0.756 | 0.0732 | 0.520 | |||
Success of E-CRM System (E-CRM) | 0.92 | 0.79 | 0.81 | |||
E-CRM1 | 0.701 | 0.771 | 0.701 | |||
E-CRM2 | 0.761 | 0.741 | 0.621 | |||
E-CRM3 | 0.780 | 0.770 | 0.751 | |||
E-CRM4 | 0.769 | 0.774 | 0.781 | |||
E-CRM5 | 0.711 | 0.701 | 0.841 |
Constructs | TD | PV | CO | CP | TR | SQ | CS | E-CRM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TD | 0.95 | |||||||
PV | 0.562 | 0.93 | ||||||
CO | 0.581 | 0.629 | 0.79 | |||||
CP | 0.581 | 0.510 | 0.652 | 0.92 | ||||
TR | 0.754 | 0.751 | 0.630 | 0.511 | 0.92 | |||
SQ | 0.604 | 0.521 | 0.511 | 0.542 | 0.531 | 0.81 | ||
CS | 0.524 | 0.529 | 0.751 | 0.619 | 0.611 | 0.533 | 0.71 | |
E-CRM | 0.720 | 0.528 | 0.555 | 0.650 | 0.501 | 0.592 | 0.641 | 0.90 |
Research Proposed Paths | t-Value (CR) | Coefficient Value (std. estim.) | p-Value | Test Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
CS E-CRM | 11.481 | 0.160 | 0.024 ** | Supported |
TR CS | 15.530 | 0.304 | 0.000 *** | Supported |
SQ CS | 7.811 | 0.415 | 0.013 ** | Supported |
TD E-CRM | 9.653 | 0.391 | 0.060 * | Supported |
PV CS | 12.166 | 0.111 | 0.000 *** | Supported |
CO E-CRM | 10.421 | 0.461 | 0.021 ** | Supported |
CP E-CRM | 9.331 | 0.083 | 0.000 *** | Supported |
Hypothesis | From | Mediation | To | Direct Effect | Indirect Effect | Mediation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H8a | TR | CS | E-CRM | 0.001 *** | 0.121 * | Mediation |
H8b | SQ | CS | E-CRM | 0.004 ** | 0.145 * | Mediation |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Al-Bashayreh, M.; Almajali, D.; Al-Okaily, M.; Masa’deh, R.; Samed Al-Adwan, A. Evaluating Electronic Customer Relationship Management System Success: The Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12310. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912310
Al-Bashayreh M, Almajali D, Al-Okaily M, Masa’deh R, Samed Al-Adwan A. Evaluating Electronic Customer Relationship Management System Success: The Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction. Sustainability. 2022; 14(19):12310. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912310
Chicago/Turabian StyleAl-Bashayreh, Mahmood, Dmaithan Almajali, Manaf Al-Okaily, Ra’ed Masa’deh, and Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan. 2022. "Evaluating Electronic Customer Relationship Management System Success: The Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction" Sustainability 14, no. 19: 12310. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912310
APA StyleAl-Bashayreh, M., Almajali, D., Al-Okaily, M., Masa’deh, R., & Samed Al-Adwan, A. (2022). Evaluating Electronic Customer Relationship Management System Success: The Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction. Sustainability, 14(19), 12310. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912310