Next Article in Journal
Multi–Disciplinary Optimizations of Small-Scale Gravitational Vortex Hydropower (SGVHP) System through Computational Hydrodynamic and Hydro–Structural Analyses
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Value Perception on Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in Farmland Fallow: A Case-Study in Major Grain-Producing Areas of Hubei and Hunan, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigating Business Potential and Users’ Acceptance of Circular Economy: A Survey and an Evaluation Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/su14020725
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chabazite from Campanian Ignimbrite Tuff as a Potential and Sustainable Remediation Agent for the Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Water

by
Francesco Izzo
1,
Alessio Langella
1,
Bruno de Gennaro
2,
Chiara Germinario
3,*,
Celestino Grifa
3,
Concetta Rispoli
1 and
Mariano Mercurio
3
1
Department of Earth Sciences, Environment and Resources, Federico II University, Via Cinthia, 80126 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, Federico II University, Piazzale V. Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, Italy
3
Department of Sciences and Technology, University of Sannio, Via De Sanctis Snc, 82100 Benevento, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(2), 725; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020725
Submission received: 22 November 2021 / Revised: 5 January 2022 / Accepted: 6 January 2022 / Published: 10 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development of Manufacturing Based on Sustainability Goals and Circular Economy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The technological performance of a chabazite-rich rock belonging to the Campanian Ignimbrite formation, outcropping in the nearby of San Mango sul Calore (southern Italy), has been evaluated for the sorption and release of ibuprofen sodium salt after a surface modification of the starting geomaterial using two different chlorinated surfactants. Equilibrium sorption isotherms and in vitro loading tests demonstrated that the maximum sorption capacities of this geomaterial reach up to 24.5 and 13.5 mg/g, respectively, for zeolite modified with cetylpyridinium and benzalkonium. These results, obtained by non-linear mathematical modeling of the experimental curves, are definitely compatible with the concentrations of the most common non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (such as ibuprofen) in wastewaters, which have been recently considered as contaminants of emerging concern. This investigation also encourages a new possible sustainable exploitation of the lithified yellow facies of Campanian Ignimbrite, although future developments will be focused on using more stable and eco-friendlier two-tailed surfactants.

1. Introduction

Natural zeolites are highly versatile hydrated tecto-aluminosilicates that constantly give back, since the beginning of their discovery, a high technological added value [1,2,3,4]. In a time of deep social and political change, such as the current post-pandemic one, new goals are opening up and are required to be achieved in a short time. On this account, the scientific community is carrying out a huge effort in investigating and promoting new green materials in support of global challenges. Recently, a scientific politically driven debate was also opened in Europe aimed at improving the quality of the climate and the environment (European Green Deal). According to the Italian Recovery and Resilience National Plan [5], the Green Revolution and Ecology Transition should aim at covering some major issues such as: (i) Circular Economy and sustainable agriculture, (ii) renewable energy, (iii) energy efficiency and redevelopment of buildings as well as (iv) protection of land and of water resources [6,7]. Moreover, Murmura et al. [8] highlighted how the industrial sector is affected, in terms of growth, by the driving forces that come from scientific research dealing with technological sustainability. Some high-tech sectors, such as optics and ophthalmic, can represent a valid example of how Industry-4.0-enabling technologies have managed to give useful answers to the market and therefore to the final user, thus matching the right balance between research investment and corporate profit. Hence, the call to pay more and more attention to further alternative and sustainable technological proposals also for those sectors unwilling to incorporate this type of change, such as, for example, lithodepuration reclamation processes.
In this frame, natural zeolites could be used, also supported by abundant scientific literature, for the development of composite materials to be used in technologies ready to face the global challenges set out above. In particular, new zeolite-rich nanocomposite materials aimed at applications in the environmental and health sectors are increasingly gaining the scene, thus providing further ideas on the use of these georesources. Actually, natural zeolites properly modified on the surface possess specific properties such as the attitude to adsorb organic molecules and to exchange undesired cations from water.
So far, several attempts have been made to demonstrate the potential and real use of these new zeolite-rich composite materials, as testified by a robust selection of literature [9,10,11,12] on several widely occurring natural zeolites, such as clinoptilolite/mordenite, phillipsite and chabazite. In recent years, in addition to the abundant literature on the world’s widespread natural clinoptilolite, experiments involving phillipsite, characterized by peculiar chemical and mineralogical features and significant technological potential, are sensibly increasing. By contrast, quite limited information is available on the attitude towards removing emerging contaminants from wastewaters, such as chabazite, another high-performing natural zeolite.
Based on the experience of this research group, this paper aims at highlighting the high-tech features of a natural chabazite zeolite-rich material functionalized with long-chain cation surfactants to be potentially used either in the pharmaceutical sector or, more specifically, in the mitigation of the risk of contaminants of emerging concern (i.e., Ibuprofen) in wastewaters. Within this frame, another goal of this study is to suggest a new possible sustainable exploitation of a chabazite-rich geomaterial (Lithified Yellow Tuff) widespread in the Campania region (southern Italy), within the eruptive products attributable to one of the largest eruptions of the last 40,000 years that occurred in the perithyrrenic area: the Campanian Ignimbrite [13].

2. The Campanian Ignimbrite: Brief Geological, Mineralogical and Exploitation Overview

The Campanian Ignimbrite (CI) is the most widespread formation of the Phlegraean Fields (Campania region, Italy) and represents the product of the main Quaternary explosive activity in the Mediterranean region, emplacing both pyroclastic fall and flow products [13].
The entire sequence can be divided into different units based on their main lithological features: Plinian Pumice Fall (PPF), Unconsolidated Stratified Ash Flow (USAF), Welded Grey Ignimbrite (WGI), Lithified Yellow Tuff (LYT) and Coarse Pumice Flow (CPF) (Figure 1a).
WGI and LYT have been widely used since historical times and are still used today, mainly as dimension stones in architecture [13].
In the last 20 years, the highly zeolitized LYT has been first deeply investigated and then used for technological applications (e.g., [12] and references therein).
The minerogenetic processes affecting LYT (Figure 1a) start with glass hydrolysis. The glass alteration defines a sodic-potassic environment that allows the crystallization of phillipsite, the predominant zeolite type in the upper part of the facies, and of subordinate chabazite. As the formation of phillipsite proceeds, the system is depleted in Na with consequent indirect Ca enrichment, thus defining geochemical conditions more favorable to the crystallization of chabazite.
The easy availability, the low cost and especially the high zeolite content allow this material to also be used for technological applications. Actually, the high cation exchange capacity and adsorption properties, as well as the high selectivity towards several polluting cations and removable water content [14], make these zeolite-rich materials particularly suitable in the treatment of urban or industrial wastewater [15], in pharmaceutical applications [16], in agriculture and pedotechnique as soil restoration agents or as slow-release fertilizers, in zootechny and husbandry as binding additives, antiagglomerant agents and food supplements, in the cement technological production as a pozzolanic addition [17] and in thermal energy storage [18]. Moreover, the high feldspar content makes this material exploitable as a substitute for traditional fluxes in ceramic artifacts.
Several Campanian Ignimbrite quarries, most of which are no longer active, are spread throughout the Campania region, but the most exploited areas for production purposes are the Caserta and Nocera-Sarno zones. According to the Regional Plan for Mining Activities in Campania region (Piano Regionale Attività Estrattive, P.R.A.E.) [19], which does not distinguish between WGI and LYT, there are 37 potentially susceptible quarrying areas for Campanian Ignimbrite (Figure 1b,c). Since the last updates related to the regional plan dating 2006, it is possible that some or all the active quarries indicated on the P.R.A.E. (Figure 1c) are no longer active.
Comparing data from the P.R.A.E. and the outcrops of Campanian Ignimbrite reported in [13], the potentially susceptible quarrying areas of LYT are in Sant’Agata dei Goti and Comiziano (Figure 1).

3. Materials and Methods

An LYT outcrop located in the municipality of San Mango sul Calore (Avellino) (Figure 1a,b) was the object of this investigation. This is an exceptionally interesting distal outcrop of LYT, especially from a technological point of view due to the high chabazite content.
A recent investigation [21] defined the mineralogical and technological features of this geomaterial, attesting a zeolite content of about 76.4 wt.%, mainly consisting of chabazite (71.2 wt.%) and minor phillipsite (~5.2 wt.%). K-feldspar (~16.2 wt.%), pyroxene (~3.1 wt.%), mica (~1.0 wt.%) and low-ordered/amorphous phases (~3.3 wt.%) also occur. The chemical composition (i.e., SiO2, 53.0 wt.%; Na2O + K2O, 8.0 wt.%) is typical of the trachytic products of the Phlegraean Fields volcanic district, characterized by a high potassium content (K2O, 6.8 wt.%). Chabazite as prevalent phase (empirical formula: [Ca1.17Na0.18K0.80Mg0.06Al3.35Si8.60O24·18.50(H2O)] [21] is characterized by Ca, K and Na-dominant extraframework cations (DEC), a medium-low Si/Al ratio (~2.57; Al = 3.35 apfu) and a R = Si/(Si + Al) of about 0.72. The theoretical CEC is 3.49 mEq/g, whereas the experimental ECEC average value is 0.229 mEq/g. On the other hand, anion exchange capacity (AEC) is ~0.1 mEq/g [10].
This chabazite-rich tuff (CHA_SM) was surface modified by the absorption of long-chain cation surfactants (cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) and benzalkonium chloride (BKC)). The derived SMNZs were tested for loading and release of ibuprofen sodium salt (IBU). Further details about the selected surfactants and drugs are reported in previous papers [12]. As a whole, a suspension containing CHA_SM and each of the selected surfactants (initial concentration of 200% of the ECEC) was mixed at 8000 rpm at ca. 50 °C using a high-speed disperser (IKA T25 digital ULTRA TURRAX) for about 70 min and with a solid-to-liquid (S/L) ratio equal to 1/40, according to the standardized procedures used for the functionalization of other natural geomaterials ([18] and references therein). IBU loading tests were performed on the filtered suspensions, washed and then dried at room temperature.
Equilibrium and kinetics adsorption tests were performed according to the literature [12]. In particular, for the equilibrium adsorption isotherms, SMNZ (100 mg) was treated, under continuous stirring, with 20 mL of ibuprofen solution (concentrations ranging between 50 and 1000 mg/L in distilled water), at room temperature after a time sufficient to attain equilibrium (ca. 4 h). The supernatant, obtained by separating the liquid from solids through centrifugation, was analyzed by means of an AquaMate UV-VIS spectrophotometer using the adsorption band at 224 nm.
The same quantity of SMNZ was placed, under continuous stirring, in tubes with 20 mL of IBU solution (concentration 400 mg/L) for the kinetic tests. Since the solubility of IBU is pH-dependent [22], for each experiment, the pH of the solution was adjusted at 7.4 with a sodium tetraborate buffer solution, necessary to keep the IBU molecules in their ionic form. UV-VIS measurements of supernatant permitted to determine non-adsorbed IBU at a scheduled time. All experiments were run in triplicate.
In order to provide a better comparison with the technological performance of previously studied geomaterials [12], in vitro release experiments were carried out using IBU-loaded composites; in particular, for simulating drug release in the intestine, 10 mL of Simulated Intestinal Fluid (hereafter, SIF) was added to 15 mg of IBU-loaded SMNZ under continuous stirring (100 rpm) in a thermostatic bath (37 °C). At scheduled times, 5 mL of supernatant, withdrawn by centrifugation and then replaced by the same volume of SIF to ensure sink conditions, was analyzed by spectrophotometric assay. SIF was prepared according to United States Pharmacopoeia 25 Ed. and following (68.05 g KH2PO4, 8.96 g NaOH, diluted in distilled water to 10 L) [10] and references therein.
Experimental data were fitted by non-linear regression, whereas the goodness-of-fit (GOF) of the different mathematical models was evaluated by determination coefficients (R2), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). A detailed description of mathematical modeling is reported in previous investigations [12].
Starting materials and SMZNs were analyzed with a Bruker Alpha FTIR spectrometer in Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) mode (128 scans at a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1 in a spectral range of 400–4000 cm−1); the same materials and IBU-loaded SMNZs were also analyzed by Simultaneous Thermal Analyses (thermogravimetry and differential scanning calorimetry, TG/DSC) coupled to Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy for Evolved Gas Analysis (FTIR-EGA). The instrument used is a NETZSCH STA 449 F3 Jupiter, where samples were heated in ultra-pure air (N2/O2 = 80/20) atmosphere (flow 60 mL/min) from room temperature to 1050 °C (heating rate of 10 °C/min). FTIR-EGA was carried out by means of a BRUKER Tensor 27 instrument, coupled to the STA 449 F3 apparatus by a transfer line heated at a temperature of 200 °C. Data analysis was carried out with Netzsch Proteus 6.1.0 (NETZSCH-Gerätebau GmbH) and Opus 7.2 software (Bruker Optics GmbH).

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Thermal Behavior and Spectral Features

Thermal behavior, investigated via STA, also responds to the peculiar physicochemical features of zeolitic material and organic compounds (surfactants) that interacted with it. In particular, the starting material shows endothermic peaks at around 168 °C and 245 °C (Figure 2) due to the release of zeolitic water from the channels and cages of zeolites [23] (12.6 wt.%), as confirmed by the detection of water vapor by FTIR-EGA (Figure 2). The definitive structural breakdown occurs at ca. 906 °C, where a broad exothermic peak in the DSC curve appears (Figure 2). The total weight loss slightly increases in both SMNZs, as testified by the occurrence (FTIR-EGA), along with residual zeolitic water, of gaseous compounds related to the thermal decomposition of surfactants (Table 1).
FTIR spectroscopy revealed characteristic spectral features for starting material, SMZNs and IBU-loaded SMNZs (Table 2). The starting material showed a very strong band at ca. 999 cm−1 (asymmetric stretching vibrations of T–O bonds) and peaks at ca. 765 and 723 cm−1 (asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations in T–O–T bonds, respectively), diagnostic absorption bands associated to internal and external framework vibrations of Primary Building Units (PBUs) and Secondary Building Units (SBUs) of chabazite [24,25,26]. The other minor bands are generally referred to as the bending vibrations in silicates, whereas the weak bands at ca. 3409 cm−1 and 1637 cm−1 suggest the presence of hygroscopic and zeolitic water (Table 2).
CHA_SM composites and ibuprofen-loaded SMNZs are featured by the presence of C–H stretching (3000–2800 cm−1) and C–H bending vibrations (1600–1300 cm−1) of surfactants and IBU [27], although IBU-loaded CHA_SM composites show more intense C–H stretching vibration bands [28,29]. On the contrary, IBU-loaded SMNZs are characterized by the presence of bands at ca. 1576 cm−1 and 1380 cm−1 (Table 2) due to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of carboxylate ions in the IBU [30].
It is worth noting that the main absorption band at ca. 999 cm−1 seems to be systematically shifted towards lower wavenumbers after the functionalization of the starting material (Table 2), suggesting indirect effects in the internal vibrations of linked tetrahedra.

4.2. Technological Performance

According to R2, BIC and AIC values (Table 3), the best-fit of experimental points of equilibrium isotherms was provided by Langmuir [31], Sips [32] and Toth [33] mathematical models (for a detailed description of mathematical modeling refer to specific literature [12]). However, the significant improvement of Goodness-of-fit (GOF) was provided by three-parameters equations (Sips and Toth), as clearly observed in the shape modification of fitting curves (Figure 3).
In particular, best-fit for isotherms was attained implementing Toth equation, which gave a quite perfect asymptotic plateau (Figure 3). GOF confirmed the applicability of this model both for CHA_CPC (R2 = 0.985; AIC = 27.26; BIC = 27.10) and CHA_BKC (R2 = 0.998; AIC = 6.05; BIC = 5.88) (Table 3).
Good results were also obtained for Sips equation (R2 = 0.979, AIC = 29.39, BIC = 29.23 for CHA_CPC; R2 = 0.998, AIC = 8.23, BIC = 8.07 for CHA_BKC), although the graphic fitting of curves demonstrates that equilibrium conditions are not achieved (Figure 3).
By contrast, the shape of curves modeled by the Langmuir equation, one of the most commonly used equations for SMNZs technological performance [4,10,21,34,35,36] and other geo-materials [31,37,38,39,40,41], shows that the asymptotic plateau both in CHA_CPC (R2 = 0.969 AIC = 30.27; BIC = 30.17) and CHA_BKC (R2 = 0.969; AIC = 24.07; BIC = 23.96) was not reached, although experimental points indicate that equilibrium conditions were achieved (Figure 3; Table 3).
Therefore, according to Toth equations, maximum sorption capacities (Smax) of SMNZs can be estimated ca. 24 mg/g and 15 mg/g for CHA_CPC and CHA_BKC, respectively (Table 3). It is worthy that the n parameters (Table 3) are far apart from the unit. Being this parameter indicative of the heterogeneity of the sorption system, sorption mechanisms that characterize the technological performance of CHA_SM composites are very complex and affected by the combination zeolite-surfactant-drug. Therefore, sorption mechanisms should consist in the simultaneous occurrence of anion exchange (predominant) and partitioning in the hydrophobic portion of the micelle.
IBU uptakes onto examined SMNZs were very fast, both using pseudo-first order (PFO) and pseudo-second order (PSO) (Table 4), with almost complete sorption occurring within the first minutes (Figure 4).
Comparing the kinetic curves, the maximum amount of loaded IBU reached for CHA_CPC was ca. 24.5 mg/g (Table 4); a lower amount was instead loaded by CHA_BKC (ca. 13.5 mg/g), according to the maximum sorption capacities calculated by equilibrium isotherms using Sips and Toth models. Considering the GOF, a similar trend in the fitting of experimental points can be observed for PFO and PSO equations, although slightly improved in the latter models.
Drug release tests revealed that 50–60% of IBU was fast released by both CHA_CPC and CHA_BKC samples; most of the drug is released in the first 30 min and completed within the first hour (Figure 4). Non-linear regression suggested that the best-fit was obtained by the first-order mathematical model for both CHA_CPC (R2 = 0.987, AIC = 30.72, BIC = 31.52) and CHA_BKC (R2 = 0.978, AIC = 23.13, BIC = 23.92).

5. Conclusions

As a matter of fact, global industrial and technological development defines a great impact on the quality of environmental matrices such as air, soils, subsoil and water systems. It is clearly demonstrated by the high level of xenobiotic compounds daily released in water bodies, often responsible for negative effects on living beings in terms of toxicity and persistence. Among them, particular attention is recently paid to the so-called emerging contaminants [42,43,44,45,46] consisting of several groups of chemicals, such as, for example, pesticides, personal care products, steroid hormones and pharmaceuticals. The latter represents one of the most common groups of emerging contaminants. In fact, the massive consumption of “over-the-counter” drugs, such as NSAIDs (e.g., ibuprofen, ketoprofen, diclofenac, naproxen, etc.), led to an increase in the level of these emerging contaminants also in the municipal waters and consequently in the wastewater treatment plants (WWPTs) [47,48]. Nevertheless, NSAIDs are not completely removed from WWPTs and, in spite of the promising results, there are some negative aspects with conventional tertiary treatments (e.g., advanced oxidation processes, adsorption on activated carbon, etc.) in terms of costs and possible harmful by-products [49,50]. For these reasons, a chabazite-rich tuff functionalized using two chlorinated surfactants has been here examined for the sorption of the NSAID ibuprofen sodium salt in order to promote an alternative and low-cost adsorption system that also provides a new possible sustainable exploitation of the lithified yellow facies of Campanian Ignimbrite. Generally, in terms of advantages and benefits, natural zeolites should be preferred to synthetic ones since the latter, although showing a good technological performance in IBU sorption [51], is normally produced in more expensive and energy-intensive industrial processes.
As a whole, the preliminary results of this research demonstrate that maximum sorption capacities of SMNZs prepared with functionalized chabazite-rich tuff outcropping in the near San Mango sul Calore (southern Italy) are definitely full compatible with the concentrations of emerging contaminants reported in the literature for water bodies. In particular, maximum sorption capacities of these composites reach up to 24.5 and 13.5 mg/g, respectively, for chabazite modified with CPC and BKC, which is quite consistent with the performances of other organomineral composites reported in the literature, as summarized in Table 5. Taking into consideration also the parameters of in vitro release tests, lithified yellow facies of Campanian Ignimbrite also displays a promising performance in the drug delivery applications [10,11,12], although future investigations are required and will address the use of more stable and eco-friendlier two-tailed surfactants. Moreover, additional experiments aiming to evaluate the interference effects with inorganic anions usually contained in real aqueous systems are strictly required ([52] and references therein).
Nevertheless, the results of this research promote a more efficient water purification process that fits the aims of the European Green Deal mission, mainly consisting of the improvement of the quality of inland and marine water systems, as well as their resilience. It should be added that the functionalized zeolites, regardless of the emerging contaminant to be removed, can also be recycled in other uses such as those involving high-temperature treatments, as those required, for example, in the production of lightweight aggregates in the industrial building sector.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.I., A.L. and M.M.; methodology, F.I., A.L., B.d.G. and M.M.; investigation, F.I., B.d.G. and C.G. (Chiara Germinario); resources, A.L. and M.M; data curation, C.G. (Celestino Grifa); writing—original draft preparation, F.I., A.L. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, F.I., A.L., B.d.G., C.G. (Chiara Germinario), C.G. (Celestino Grifa), C.R. and M.M.; visualization, F.I., C.G. (Chiara Germinario) and C.R.; supervision, A.L. and M.M.; project administration, A.L. and M.M.; funding acquisition, A.L. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FRA 2019–2020 to Mariano Mercurio and Alessio Langella. Chiara Germinario was supported by a research grant on the project PON AIM1845378-1; CUP: F84I19000040001 within further investigations have been performed. Francesco Izzo was supported by a research grant on the project PON “Ricerca e Innovazione” 2014-2020 (PON R&I)—Azione IV.6—“Contratti di ricerca su tematiche Green”; CUP: E65F21003260003.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on the request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Piergiulio Cappelletti for his support in the acquisition of the preliminary mineralogical data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Misaelides, P. Application of natural zeolites in environmental remediation: A short review. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2011, 144, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bowman, R.S. Applications of surfactant-modified zeolites to environmental remediation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2003, 61, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Reeve, P.J.; Fallowfield, H.J. Natural and surfactant modified zeolites: A review of their applications for water remediation with a focus on surfactant desorption and toxicity towards microorganisms. J. Environ. Manage. 2018, 205, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, S.; Peng, Y. Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Italian Council of Ministers. Recovery and Resilience Plan; European Parliamentary Research Service(EPRS): Brussels, Belgium, 2021.
  6. Vacchi, M.; Siligardi, C.; Demaria, F.; González-Sánchez, R.; Settembre-Blundo, D. Technological Sustainability or Sustainable Technology? A Multidimensional Vision of Sustainability in Manufacturing. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cavalieri, A.; Reis, J.; Amorim, M. Circular economy and internet of things: Mapping science of case studies in manufacturing industry. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Murmura, F.; Bravi, L.; Santos, G. Sustainable process and product innovation in the eyewear sector: The role of industry 4.0 enabling technologies. Sustainability 2021, 13, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Suazo-Hernández, J.; Sepúlveda, P.; Manquián-Cerda, K.; Ramírez-Tagle, R.; Rubio, M.A.; Bolan, N.; Sarkar, B.; Arancibia-Miranda, N. Synthesis and characterization of zeolite-based composites functionalized with nanoscale zero-valent iron for removing arsenic in the presence of selenium from water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 373, 810–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Serri, C.; de Gennaro, B.; Catalanotti, L.; Cappelletti, P.; Langella, A.; Mercurio, M.; Mayol, L.; Biondi, M. Surfactant-modified phillipsite and chabazite as novel excipients for pharmaceutical applications? Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 224, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. de Gennaro, B.; Catalanotti, L.; Cappelletti, P.; Langella, A.; Mercurio, M.; Serri, C.; Biondi, M.; Mayol, L. Surface modified natural zeolite as a carrier for sustained diclofenac release: A preliminary feasibility study. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2015, 130, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Izzo, F.; Mercurio, M.; de Gennaro, B.; Aprea, P.; Cappelletti, P.; Daković, A.; Germinario, C.; Grifa, C.; Smiljanic, D.; Langella, A. Surface modified natural zeolites (SMNZs) as nanocomposite versatile materials for health and environment. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2019, 182, 110380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Langella, A.; Bish, D.L.; Cappelletti, P.; Cerri, G.; Colella, A.; de Gennaro, R.; Graziano, S.F.; Perrotta, A.; Scarpati, C.; de Gennaro, M. New insights into the mineralogical facies distribution of Campanian Ignimbrite, a relevant Italian industrial material. Appl. Clay Sci. 2013, 72, 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Esposito, S.; Marocco, A.; Dell’Agli, G.; De Gennaro, B.; Pansini, M. Relationships between the water content of zeolites and their cation population. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015, 202, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Colella, C.; Pansini, M. Lead removal from wastewaters using chabazite tuff. ACS Symp. Ser. 1988, 368, 500–510. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cerri, G.; Farina, M.; Brundu, A.; Daković, A.; Giunchedi, P.; Gavini, E.; Rassu, G. Natural zeolites for pharmaceutical formulations: Preparation and evaluation of a clinoptilolite-based material. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 223, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Özen Karsli, S.; Göncüoğlu, M.; Liguori, B.; de Gennaro, B.; Cappelletti, P.; Gatta, G.; Iucolano, F.; Colella, C. A comprehensive evaluation of sedimentary zeolites from Turkey as pozzolanic addition of cement-and lime-based binders. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 105, 46–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Basile, A.; Cacciola, G.; Colella, C.; Mercadante, L.; Pansini, M. Thermal conductivity of natural zeolite-PTFE composites. Heat Recover. Syst. CHP 1992, 12, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Campania Region. PRAE (Regional Plan of the Exploiting Activities in Campania Region); Campania Region: Campania, Italy, 2006.
  20. Scarpati, C.; Sparice, D.; Perrotta, A. A crystal concentration method for calculating ignimbrite volume from distal ash-fall deposits and a reappraisal of the magnitude of the Campanian Ignimbrite. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2014, 280, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cappelletti, P.; Colella, A.; Langella, A.; Mercurio, M.; Catalanotti, L.; Monetti, V.; De Gennaro, B. Use of surface modified natural zeolite (SMNZ) in pharmaceutical preparations Part 1. Mineralogical and technological characterization of some industrial zeolite-rich rocks. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 250, 232–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cristofoletti, R.; Dressman, J.B. Dissolution methods to increasing discriminatory power of in vitro dissolution testing for ibuprofen free acid and its salts. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 106, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Coombs, D.S.; Alberti, A.; Armbruster, T.; Artioli, G.; Colella, C.; Galli, E.; Grice, J.D.; Liebau, F.; Mandarino, J.A.; Minato, H.; et al. Recommended nomenclature for zeolite minerals: Report of the subcommittee on zeolites of the International Mineralogical Association, Commission on new Minerals and Mineral names. Can. Mineral. 1997, 35, 1571–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Byrappa, K.; Kumar, B.V.S. Characterization of zeolites by infrared spectroscopy. Asian J. Chem. 2007, 19, 4933–4935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Karge, H.G. Characterization by IR spectroscopy. In Verified Syntheses of Zeolitic Materials; John Wiley Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 69–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mozgawa, W.; Król, M.; Barczyk, K. FT-IR studies of zeolites from different structural groups. Chem. Nauk. 2011, 1, 667–674. [Google Scholar]
  27. Barczyk, K.; Mozgawa, W.; Król, M. Studies of anions sorption on natural zeolites. Spectrochim. Acta. A. Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 133, 876–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Krajišnik, D.; Daković, A.; Malenović, A.; Kragović, M.; Milić, J. Ibuprofen sorption and release by modified natural zeolites as prospective drug carriers. Clay Miner. 2015, 50, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Krajišnik, D.; Daković, A.; Malenović, A.; Milojević, M.; Dondur, V.; Milić, J. Cationic surfactants-modified natural zeolites: Potential excipients for anti-inflammatory drugs. In Proceedings of the 3rd Croatian–Slovenian Symposium on Zeolites, Trogir, Croatia, 16–17 September 2010; pp. 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wray, P.S.; Clarke, G.S.; Kazarian, S.G. Application of FTIR spectroscopic imaging to study the effects of modifying the pH microenvironment on the dissolution of ibuprofen from HPMC matrices. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 100, 4745–4755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Langmuir, I. the Constitution and Fundamental Properties of Solids and Liquids. Part I. Solids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1916, 252, 2221–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Sips, R. Combined form of Langmuir and Freundlich equations. J. Chem. Phys 1948, 16, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Toth, J. State equations of the solid-gas interface layers. Acta Chim Acad Sci Hungar 1971, 69, 311–328. [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, Z.; Anghel, I.; Bowman, R.S. Sorption of Oxyanions By Surfactant-Modified Zeolite. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 1998, 19, 843–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, Z.; Jones, H.K.; Bowman, R.S.; Helferich, R. Enhanced reduction of chromate and PCE by pelletized surfactant-modified zeolite/zerovalent iron. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 4326–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Krajišnik, D.; Milojević, M.; Malenović, A.; Daković, A.; Ibrić, S.; Savić, S.; Dondur, V.; Matijašević, S.; Radulović, A.; Daniels, R.; et al. Cationic surfactants-modified natural zeolites: Improvement of the excipients functionality. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2010, 36, 1215–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, Z.; Bowman, R.S. Sorption of chromate and PCE by surfactant-modified clay minerals. Environ. Eng. Sci. 1998, 15, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Z.; Bowman, R.S. Counterion effects on the sorption of cationic surfactant and chromate on natural clinoptilolite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 31, 2407–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, Z.; Bowman, R.S. Regeneration of surfactant-modified zeolite after saturation with chromate and perchloroethylene. Water Res. 2001, 35, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Janićijević, J.; Krajišnik, D.; Čalija, B.; Vasiljević, B.N.; Dobričić, V.; Daković, A.; Antonijević, M.D.; Milić, J. Modified local diatomite as potential functional drug carrier—A model study for diclofenac sodium. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 496, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Foo, K.Y.; Hameed, B.H. Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sauvé, S.; Desrosiers, M. A review of what is an emerging contaminant. Chem. Cent. J. 2014, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Loos, R.; Carvalho, R.; António, D.C.; Comero, S.; Locoro, G.; Tavazzi, S.; Paracchini, B.; Ghiani, M.; Lettieri, T.; Blaha, L.; et al. EU-wide monitoring survey on emerging polar organic contaminants in wastewater treatment plant effluents. Water Res. 2013, 47, 6475–6487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Petrovic, M.; Eljarrat, E.; Lopez De Alda, M.J.; Barceló, D. Endocrine disrupting compounds and other emerging contaminants in the environment: A survey on new monitoring strategies and occurrence data. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 378, 549–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tiedeken, E.J.; Tahar, A.; McHugh, B.; Rowan, N.J. Monitoring, sources, receptors, and control measures for three European Union watch list substances of emerging concern in receiving waters—A 20 year systematic review. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 574, 1140–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sousa, J.C.G.; Ribeiro, A.R.; Barbosa, M.O.; Pereira, M.F.R.; Silva, A.M.T. A review on environmental monitoring of water organic pollutants identified by EU guidelines. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 344, 146–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gros, M.; Petrović, M.; Ginebreda, A.; Barceló, D. Removal of pharmaceuticals during wastewater treatment and environmental risk assessment using hazard indexes. Environ. Int. 2010, 36, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, Y.; Ok, Y.S.; Kim, K.H.; Kwon, E.E.; Tsang, Y.F. Occurrences and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in drinking water and water/sewage treatment plants: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 596–597, 303–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Coelho, A.D.; Sans, C.; Esplugas, S.; Dezotti, M. Ozonation of NSAID: A Biodegradability and Toxicity Study. Ozone Sci. Eng. 2010, 32, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kyzas, G.Z.; Fu, J.; Lazaridis, N.K.; Bikiaris, D.N.; Matis, K.A. New approaches on the removal of pharmaceuticals from wastewaters with adsorbent materials. J. Mol. Liq. 2015, 209, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Horcajada, P.; Márquez-Alvarez, C.; Rámila, A.; Pérez-Pariente, J.; Vallet-Regí, M. Controlled release of Ibuprofen from dealuminated faujasites. Solid State Sci. 2006, 8, 1459–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Smiljanić, D.; Daković, A.; Obradović, M.; Ožegović, M.; Izzo, F.; Germinario, C.; de Gennaro, B. Application of Surfactant Modified Natural Zeolites for the Removal of Salicylic Acid—A Contaminant of Emerging Concern. Materials 2021, 14, 7728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Whitney, D.L.; Evans, B.W. Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals. Am. Mineral. 2010, 95, 185–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pasquino, R.; Di Domenico, M.; Izzo, F.; Gaudino, D.; Vanzanella, V.; Grizzuti, N.; de Gennaro, B. Rheology-sensitive response of zeolite-supported anti-inflammatory drug systems. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2016, 146, 938–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Krajišnik, D.; Daković, A.; Milojević, M.; Malenović, A.; Kragović, M.; Bogdanović, D.B.; Dondur, V.; Milić, J. Properties of diclofenac sodium sorption onto natural zeolite modified with cetylpyridinium chloride. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2011, 83, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Krajišnik, D.; Daković, A.; Malenović, A.; Milojević-Rakić, M.; Dondur, V.; Radulović, Ž.; Milić, J. Investigation of adsorption and release of diclofenac sodium by modified zeolites composites. Appl. Clay Sci. 2013, 83–84, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jevtić, S.; Grujić, S.; Hrenović, J.; Rajić, N. Surfactant-modified clinoptilolite as a salicylate carrier, salicylate kinetic release and its antibacterial activity. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 159, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Choi, J.; Shin, W.S. Removal of Salicylic and Ibuprofen by Hexadecyltrimethylammonium-Modified Montmorillonite and Zeolite. Minerals 2020, 10, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rakić, V.; Rajić, N.; Daković, A.; Auroux, A. The adsorption of salicylic acid, acetylsalicylic acid and atenolol from aqueous solutions onto natural zeolites and clays: Clinoptilolite, bentonite and kaolin. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 166, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sustainability 14 00725 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Sketch model of the minerogenetic processes affecting the different units of CI (modified after [13]); (b) Distribution of Campanian Ignimbrite (modified after [20]); (c) Sketch map of potentially susceptible quarrying areas of Campanian Ignimbrite.
Figure 1. (a) Sketch model of the minerogenetic processes affecting the different units of CI (modified after [13]); (b) Distribution of Campanian Ignimbrite (modified after [20]); (c) Sketch map of potentially susceptible quarrying areas of Campanian Ignimbrite.
Sustainability 14 00725 g001
Sustainability 14 00725 g002 550
Figure 2. Simultaneous thermal analyses (TG/DSC coupled to FTIR-EGA) of sample CHA_SM (starting geomaterial).
Figure 2. Simultaneous thermal analyses (TG/DSC coupled to FTIR-EGA) of sample CHA_SM (starting geomaterial).
Sustainability 14 00725 g002
Sustainability 14 00725 g003 550
Figure 3. Equilibrium isotherms of CHA_SM composites fitted using Langmuir (a), Sips (b) and Toth (c) mathematical models.
Figure 3. Equilibrium isotherms of CHA_SM composites fitted using Langmuir (a), Sips (b) and Toth (c) mathematical models.
Sustainability 14 00725 g003
Sustainability 14 00725 g004 550
Figure 4. Ibuprofen loading (a) and release (b) kinetic runs of CHA_SM composites fitted using pseudo-second-order and pseudo-first-order mathematical models, respectively.
Figure 4. Ibuprofen loading (a) and release (b) kinetic runs of CHA_SM composites fitted using pseudo-second-order and pseudo-first-order mathematical models, respectively.
Sustainability 14 00725 g004
Table
Table 1. Simultaneous Thermal Analyses TG-DSC and FTIR-EGA of the starting geomaterial CHA_SM and SMNZs.
Table 1. Simultaneous Thermal Analyses TG-DSC and FTIR-EGA of the starting geomaterial CHA_SM and SMNZs.
Starting
Material		T < 550 °C550 °C < T < 1050 °CL.O.I (%)
ΔW (%)DSC a (°C)EGAΔW (%)DSC a,b (°C)EGA
CHA_SM12.6169 ÷ 244H2O0.8906 b-13.4
SMNZsT < 200 °C200 °C < T < 1050 °CL.O.I (%)
ΔW (%)DSC a (°C)EGAΔW (%)DSC a,b (°C)EGA
CHA_CPC6.2123 ÷ 17913.67.4251 b ÷ 332 b ÷ 497 b ÷ 937 bCO2 + CH3 + CH2 + H2O + CO tr13.6
CHA_BKC8.315615.67.3212 b ÷ 279 b ÷ 382 b ÷ 506 b ÷ 943 bCO2 + CH3 + CH2 + H2O + CO tr15.6
Legend: a Endothermic; b Exothermic; L.O.I., loss on ignition; ΔW, weight loss (by TG); tr traces.
Table
Table 2. FTIR data of starting material (CHA_SM), SMNZs and ibuprofen-loaded composites. CPC, cetylpyridinium chloride; BKC, benzalkonium chloride; IBU, ibuprofen.
Table 2. FTIR data of starting material (CHA_SM), SMNZs and ibuprofen-loaded composites. CPC, cetylpyridinium chloride; BKC, benzalkonium chloride; IBU, ibuprofen.
CHA_SMCHA_CPCCHA_CPC + IBUCHA_BKCCHA_BKC + IBUTentative Vibrational AssignmentsChemical Phase
3409 w3406 w3428 w3388 w3415 wO–H stretching water
2954 sh2953 vw2955 sh2953 vwC–H stretchingSurfactant/IBU
2916 w2921 w2922 vw2921 wC–H stretchingSurfactant/IBU
2850 w2851 w2852 vw2852 wC–H stretchingSurfactant/IBU
1637 w1636 w1636 w1638 w1635 wO–H bendingwater
1576 vw 1574 vwAsymmetric stretching in carboxylate ionIBU
1489 vw1489 vw1485 vw1489 vwC−H bendingSurfactant/IBU
1470 vw1466 vw1470 vw1466 vwC−H bendingSurfactant/IBU
1381 vw 1381 vwSymmetric stretching in carboxylate ionIBU
999 vs995 vs992 vs993 vs993 vsT–O asymmetric stretchingSilicates
765 vw777 w777 w769 w776 wT–O–T asymmetric stretchingSilicates
723 vw719 w721 w726 w720 wT–O–T symmetric stretchingSilicates
628 w603 w599 w625 w599 wT–O–T bendingSilicates
516 w515 vw519 vw516 w517 vwT–O–T bendingSilicates
461 w 454 w T–O–T bendingSilicates
408 w421 w424 w408 vw422 wT–O–T bendingSilicates
Legend: vw, very weak; w, weak; sh, shoulder; vs, very strong.
Table
Table 3. Isotherm parameters of CHA_SM composites.
Table 3. Isotherm parameters of CHA_SM composites.
SampleMathematical ModelParametersGoodness-of-Fit
K (L∙mg−1)nSmax (mg∙g−1)Smax (mEq∙g−1)R2AICBIC
CHA_CPCLangmuir0.01 28.30.1240.96930.2730.17
Sips0.0121.5525.40.1110.97929.3929.23
Toth0.0062.9524.40.1070.98527.2627.1
CHA_BKCLangmuir0.004 19.80.0870.96924.0723.96
Sips0.0072.215.380.0670.9988.238.07
Toth0.0035.5914.860.0650.9986.055.88
Table
Table 4. IBU loading kinetic runs parameters of CHA_SM composites.
Table 4. IBU loading kinetic runs parameters of CHA_SM composites.
SampleMathematical ModelParametersGoodness-of-Fit
K1 (min−1)K2 (g∙mg−1∙min−1)Q0 (mg∙g−1)Q0 (mEq∙g−1)R2AICBIC
CHA_CPCPseudo-first order0.244 24.390.110.99224.1724.78
Pseudo-second order 0.10024.510.110.99323.7724.57
CHA_BKCPseudo-first order0.425 13.320.060.98121.4822.28
Pseudo-second order 0.10713.460.060.98121.3822.18
Table
Table 5. Drug sorption capacities of surfactant-modified CHA_SM (present study) compared with those of other organomineral composites from literature (main mineral abbreviations form [53]). Legend: Cbz, chabazite; Php, phillipsite; Sme, smectite; Cpt, clinoptilolite; Mnt, montomorillonite; Kln, kaolinite; IBU, ibuprofen; DCF, diclofenac; KET, ketoprofen; NAP, naproxen; SA, salicylic acid; DDEA, diclofenac diethylamine; CPC, cetylpyridinium chloride; BKC, Benzalkonium chloride; HDTMA-Cl, hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride; HDTMA-Br, hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide; ARQ, Arquad; ODMBA, octadecyldimethylbenzylammonium chloride; n.a., not available; *, included references therein.
Table 5. Drug sorption capacities of surfactant-modified CHA_SM (present study) compared with those of other organomineral composites from literature (main mineral abbreviations form [53]). Legend: Cbz, chabazite; Php, phillipsite; Sme, smectite; Cpt, clinoptilolite; Mnt, montomorillonite; Kln, kaolinite; IBU, ibuprofen; DCF, diclofenac; KET, ketoprofen; NAP, naproxen; SA, salicylic acid; DDEA, diclofenac diethylamine; CPC, cetylpyridinium chloride; BKC, Benzalkonium chloride; HDTMA-Cl, hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride; HDTMA-Br, hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide; ARQ, Arquad; ODMBA, octadecyldimethylbenzylammonium chloride; n.a., not available; *, included references therein.
ID SampleDescription Adsorbent MineralsDrugSurfactantSmaxReference
CHA_SMCampanian Ignimbrite (Lithified Yellow Tuff) from San Mango sul Calore (southern Italy)Cbz (71.2 wt.%), Php (5.2 wt.%)IBUCPC24.5 mg/gPresent study
IBUBKC13.5 mg/gPresent study
DCFCPC21.3 mg/g[10]
PHI_SAVNeapolitan Yellow Tuff from Savanelli quarry (southern Italy)Cbz (4.5 wt.%), Php (69.6 wt.%)IBUCPC19.3 mg/g[12]
IBUCPC22 mg/g[54]
IBUBKC20.9 mg/g[12]
IBUHDTMA-Cl26.4 mg/g[12]
IBUHDTMA-Br27.9 mg/g[12]
DCFCPC65 mg/g[54]
DCFCPC45.1 mg/g[10]
PHIL75Phillipsite-rich rock from Campania Region (commercialized by Italiana Zeoliti—CBKC Group)Cbz (4.0 wt.%), Php (44.0 wt.%), Sme (11 wt.%)IBUCPC17.9 mg/g[52] *
IBUARQ4.8 mg/g[52] *
DCFCPC30 mg/g[52] *
DCFARQ19.9 mg/g[52] *
KETCPC12.5 mg/g[52] *
KETARQ10.9 mg/g[52] *
NAPCPC17.9 mg/g[52] *
NAPARQ4.8 mg/g[52] *
SACPC10.0 mg/g[52] *
SAARQ4.4 mg/g[52] *
CLI_SKClinoptilolite-rich rock from Nižný Hrabovec deposit (East-Slovakia basin)Cpt (55.7 wt.%)IBUCPC16.9 mg/g[12]
IBUBKC15.0 mg/g[12]
IBUHDTMA-Cl22.5 mg/g[12]
IBUHDTMA-Br25.9 mg/g[12]
DCFCPC49.0 mg/g[10]
CLI_CAClinoptilolite-rich rock from California, USA (commercialized by St. Cloud Mining Company)Cpt (80.0 wt.%)DCFCPC40.3 mg/g[11]
ZVBClinoptilolite-rich tuff from the Zlatokop mine (Vranjska Banja, Serbia)Cpt (80 wt.%)IBUBKC13.1 mg/g[29]
DCFCPC42.9 mg/g[55]
DCFHDTMA-Br54.1 mg/g[56]
DDEABKC37.3 mg/g[29]
NZ-BKCClinoptilolite-rich tuff from the Zlatokop mine (Vranjska Banja, Serbia)Cpt (73 wt.%)SABKC19.0 mg/g[57]
IZ_CLIClinoptilolite-rich tuff from Eskişehir (Turkey)Cpt (79.0 wt.%)IBUCPC19.7 mg/g[52] *
IBUARQ12.5 mg/g[52] *
DCFCPC35 mg/g[52] *
DCFARQ23.3 mg/g[52] *
KETCPC13.6 mg/g[52] *
KETARQ9.3 mg/g[52] *
NAPCPC16.1 mg/g[52] *
NAPARQ7.7 mg/g[52] *
SACPC11.0 mg/g[52] *
SAARQ8.5 mg/g[52] *
HZCommercial zeolite (Wangpyo Chemical Co., Pohang, Korea)n.a.IBUHDTMA-Cl13.6 mg/g[58]
SAHDTMA-Cl3.3 mg/g[58]
HMMontomorillonite-KSF (Aldrich Chemical Co., Munich, Germany)MntIBUHDTMA-Cl13.5 mg/g[58]
SAHDTMA-Cl5.9 mg/g[58]
OMBentonite obtained from Šipovo deposit (Bosnia)Mnt (90 wt.%)SAODMBA3.2 mg/g[59]
OKKaolin from a plant for production of quartz sand in Rgotina (Serbia)KlnSAODMBA4.8 mg/g[59]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Izzo, F.; Langella, A.; de Gennaro, B.; Germinario, C.; Grifa, C.; Rispoli, C.; Mercurio, M. Chabazite from Campanian Ignimbrite Tuff as a Potential and Sustainable Remediation Agent for the Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Water. Sustainability 2022, 14, 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020725

AMA Style

Izzo F, Langella A, de Gennaro B, Germinario C, Grifa C, Rispoli C, Mercurio M. Chabazite from Campanian Ignimbrite Tuff as a Potential and Sustainable Remediation Agent for the Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Water. Sustainability. 2022; 14(2):725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020725

Chicago/Turabian Style

Izzo, Francesco, Alessio Langella, Bruno de Gennaro, Chiara Germinario, Celestino Grifa, Concetta Rispoli, and Mariano Mercurio. 2022. "Chabazite from Campanian Ignimbrite Tuff as a Potential and Sustainable Remediation Agent for the Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Water" Sustainability 14, no. 2: 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020725

APA Style

Izzo, F., Langella, A., de Gennaro, B., Germinario, C., Grifa, C., Rispoli, C., & Mercurio, M. (2022). Chabazite from Campanian Ignimbrite Tuff as a Potential and Sustainable Remediation Agent for the Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Water. Sustainability, 14(2), 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020725

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop