Effect of Food Consumption Values of Vietnamese Consumers on the Reliability and Purchase Intention of Korean Home Meal Replacements
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Food Consumption Value
2.2. Product Reliability and Purchase Intention
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Participants and Survey Period
3.2. Questionnaire and Statistical Analysis
4. Results
5. Discussion and Conclusions
5.1. Discussion
5.2. Theoretical Contributions
5.3. Managerial Implications
5.4. Limitations and Further Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lee, H.I.; Han, A.R.; Kim, K.D.; Lim, H.J. Vietnam Entry Strategy; Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency: Seoul, Korea, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Tran, V.T. Vietnamese economy at the crossroads: New Doi moi for sustained growth. Asian Econ. Policy Rev. 2013, 8, 122–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeo, T.D. A study of Korea’s trade strategy toward Vietnam. Int. Com. Inf. Rev. 2019, 21, 95–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, A.; Ascent, D. World Economic Outlook; International Monetary Fund: Washington, DC, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Korea International Trade Association. Current Status and Prospects of Retail Industry in Vietnam in 2021; Korea International Trade Association: Seoul, Korea, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Cho, Y.H. A study on the expansion strategy for Korean SMEs to the CLMV markets. KOSBI 2017. Available online: https://sejong.nl.go.kr/search/searchDetail.do?rec_key=SH1_KMO201812014&upperMenuId=&menuId=&part=&topF1= (accessed on 22 June 2021).
- Worldometers. Viet. Popul. Worldometers. 2021. Available online: https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/vietnam-population/ (accessed on 22 June 2021).
- Heo, J.; Lee, D.S.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, Y.J.; Choi, M.J.; Cho, S.M.; An, K.M. A Study on the Selection of Key Areas for International Agricultural Development Cooperation by Major Countries; Korea Rural Economic Institute: Naju, Korea, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. Household Size and Composition 2019; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- General Statistics of Vietnam. Completed Results of the 2019 Viet Nam Population and Housing Census; General Statistics of Vietnam: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2020.
- Buckley, M.; Cowan, C.; McCarthy, M. The convenience food market in Great Britain: Convenience food lifestyle (CFL) segments. Appetite 2007, 49, 600–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cho, Y.S. HMR industry status in Japan. Korean Rural Econ. Inst. 2019, 222, 43–68. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang, J.S.; Yoon, Y.J.; Kim, H.J. The effects of product reliability on brand image, repurchase intention, and word-of-mouth in the context of home meal replacement: The moderating role of the manufacturer type. Int. J. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2019, 33, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, B.Y.; Kim, H.I.; Kim, J.S. A study on the effect of consumers’ brand trust, value consciousness, country of origin, and attitude toward Korean Wave products on purchase intention: A case of Vietnam. J. Korean Cult. Ind. 2019, 19, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seto, K.C.; Ramankutty, N. Hidden linkages between urbanization and food systems. Science 2016, 352, 943–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srinivasan, S.; Shende, K.M. A study on the benefits of convenience foods to working women. ATITHYA 2015, 1, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olsen, S.O.; Tuu, H.H. Time perspectives and convenience food consumption among teenagers in Vietnam: The dual role of hedonic and healthy eating values. Food Res. Int. 2017, 99, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Che, B.K.; Han, S.Y.; Kim, S.K. Consumption value study affecting consumer attitude and purchase intention: Focusing on Korean ginseng products market in Vietnam. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 36, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baskaran, S.; Ayob, S.A.; Howe, N.C.; Mahadi, N. Understanding purchase intention of ready-to-eat food among Malaysian urbanites: A proposed framework. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2017, 7, 566–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandelkar, P. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Affecting Consumer Purchase Intention for Ready-to-Eat Food in Bangkok and Its Vicinity; Bangkok University: Bangkok, Thailand, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency. Regional Entry Strategy. Southeast Asia; Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency: Seoul, Korea, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Bang, S.A.; Challenges and strategies for urbanization in ASEAN. KRISH 2021. Available online: https://www.krihs.re.kr/publica/reportView.do?num=000003629185&num=000003629185 (accessed on 22 June 2021).
- Connors, M.; Bisogni, C.A.; Sobal, J.; Devine, C.M. Managing values in personal food systems. Appetite 2001, 36, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grunert, K.G. Towards a concept of food-related lifestyle. Appetite 1993, 21, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huong, V.T.T. Basic Study on Promoting Korean Food Hallyu in Vietnam. J. Cult. Contents 2012, 2, 233–272. [Google Scholar]
- Phan, T.H.; Jeong, J.Y. Potential economic impacts of the Vietnam–Korea free trade agreement on Vietnam. J. East Asian Econ. Integr. 2016, 20, 67–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khai, N.T.N.; Hang, T.T.T. Hallyu and the impact on young consumers’ preference for Korean restaurants in Vietnam. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Economics, Business and Tourism, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 15 June 2019; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Solomon, M.R.; Rabolt, N.J. Consumer behavior. In Fashion; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz, S.H.; Bardi, A. Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 2001, 32, 268–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bardi, A.; Schwartz, S.H. Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2003, 29, 1207–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhamed, A.A.; Ab Rahman, M.N.; Hamzah, F.M.; Zain, C.R.C.M.; Zailani, S. The impact of consumption value on consumer behaviour: A case study of halal-certified food supplies. Br. Food J. 2019, 121, 2915–2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hung, K.; Chen, A.; Peng, N. The symbolic consumption of cultural quarters. Tour. Anal. 2019, 24, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Su, J.; Yin, C. Consumer’s symbol-consumption and brand management. In Proceedings of the Wuhan International Conference on E-Bisnis, Wuhan, China, 27–29 May 2016; pp. 458–466. [Google Scholar]
- Verma, H.V. Coffee and tea: Socio-cultural meaning, context and branding. Asia Pac. J. Manag. Res. Innov. 2013, 9, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witt, U. Symbolic consumption and the social construction of product characteristics. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 2010, 21, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dagevos, H.; van Ophem, J. Food consumption value: Developing a consumer-centred concept of value in the field of food. Br. Food J. 2013, 115, 1473–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lönnqvist, J.; Jasinskaja-Lahti, I.; Verkasalo, M. Personal values before and after migration: A longitudinal case study on value change in Ingrian–Finnish migrants. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 2011, 2, 584–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Worsley, A.; Wang, W.C.; Hunter, W. Baby boomers’ food shopping habits. Relationships with demographics and personal values. Appetite 2010, 55, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, Y.; Ryu, S. Motivation to Choose a Public Service Career in De-Veloping Countries: Focused on Philippines, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Vietnam, and Indonesia; Research Institute, International University of Japan: Minamiuonuma, Japan, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Hitchcock, M.; Wesner, S. Vietnamese values, networks and family businesses in London. Asia Pac. Bus. Rev. 2009, 15, 265–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salter, M.L.; Go, V.F.; Minh, N.L.; Gregowski, A.; Ha, T.V.; Rudolph, A.; Latkin, C.; Celentano, D.D.; Quan, V.M. Influence of perceived secondary stigma and family on the response to HIV infection among injection drug users in Vietnam. AIDS Educ. Prev. 2010, 22, 558–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.G.; Hong, W.S. Influence of consumption value on the attitude, customer satisfaction and purchase intention for convenience store refrigerated HMR products. Korean J. Food Cook. Sci. 2019, 35, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, B.N.; Choi, T.H.; Kim, M.J. The effects of menu characteristics of HMR convenience store lunch box on functional consumption value and repurchase intention. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res. 2019, 25, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.H.; Woo, Y.H.; Kim, D.B.; Lee, H.Y.; Cho, H.J. The value structure of Korean convenience store lunch box (Dosirak) consumers: An application of the Meansend approach. J. Eurasian Stud. 2016, 13, 235–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botonaki, A.; Mattas, K. Revealing the values behind convenience food consumption. Appetite 2010, 55, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qasim, H.; Yan, L.; Guo, R.; Saeed, A.; Ashraf, B.N. The defining role of environmental self-identity among consumption values and behavioral intention to consume organic food. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rahnama, H. Effect of consumption values on women’s choice behavior toward organic foods: The case of organic yogurt in Iran. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2017, 23, 144–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, E.S. Impact of multiple perceived value on consumers’ brand preference and purchase intention: A case of snack foods. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2010, 16, 386–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choe, J.Y.; Kim, S. Effects of tourists’ local food consumption value on attitude, food destination image, and behavioral intention. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 71, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Gan, Y.; Song, Y.; Liu, J. What influences the perceived trust of a voice-enabled smart home system: An empirical study. Sensors 2021, 21, 2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blackshaw, P. New media-the six drivers of brand credibility. Mark. Manag. 2008, 17, 51. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.S.; Hong, G.N.; Park, N.H.; Chun, T.Y. The effects of home meal replacement (HMR) selection attributes on consumer satisfaction and trust in the context of eating lifestyle. J. Distrib. Manag. Res 2019, 22, 71–80. [Google Scholar]
- Yoon, S. A study on the antecedents of trust toward shopping mall Web sites and its effects on purchase intention. Korean Manag. Rev. 2000, 29, 353–376. [Google Scholar]
- Habib, S.; Hamadneh, N.N. Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers Technology Acceptance in Online Grocery Adoption amid COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ra, C. The effects of selection attributes on attitude and repurchase intention for home meal replacement (HMR): Focused on moderating role of brand trust. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res. 2018, 24, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, E.Y.; Kim, M.M.; Lee, S.B. The effects of the CVS private brand menu product attributes on satisfaction, intention to repurchase and brand trust. Int. J. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2016, 30, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricci, E.C.; Banterle, A.; Stranieri, S. Trust to go green: An exploration of consumer intentions for eco-friendly convenience food. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 148, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Jong, B.; Worsley, A.; Wang, W.C.; Sarmugam, R.; Pham, Q.; Februhartanty, J.; Ridley, S. Personal values, marketing attitudes and nutrition trust are associated with patronage of convenience food outlets in the Asia-Pacific region: A cross-sectional study. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2017, 36, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Han, J. Effects of brand image on purchase intention and brand loyalty: Focused on mediating role of the brand trust. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res. 2017, 23, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montano, D.E.; Kasprzyk, D. Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. Health behavior: Theory. Res. Pract. 2015, 70, 231. [Google Scholar]
- Yoon, H.; Yoon, H. A study on the effect of personal consumption values on purchase intention of environment friendly agricultural products: The moderating effect of environmental conscious behavior. Korean J. Hotel Admin. 2013, 22, 253–267. [Google Scholar]
- Oh, M.; Park, H.; Lee, S.; Park, S. The effect of well-being lifestyle on perceived value and purchase intention of naturalistic cosmetics. Korean J. Aesthet. Cosmetol. 2010, 8, 175–190. [Google Scholar]
- Min, K.; Hong, W. The Effect of Food Sustainability and the Food Safety Climate on the Job Stress, Job Satisfaction and Job Commitment of Kitchen Staff. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anselmsson, J.; Vestman Bondesson, N.V.; Johansson, U. Brand image and customers’ willingness to pay a price premium for food brands. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2014, 23, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joo, J.; Han, Y. An Evidence of Distributed Trust in Blockchain-Based Sustainable Food Supply Chain. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abd Aziz, N.A.; Ramdan, M.R.; Nik Hussin, N.S.; Abdul Aziz, Z.; Osman, J.; Hasbollah, H.R. The Determinants of Global Ex-pansion: A Study on Food and Beverage Franchisors in Malaysia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, S.I. Undergraduate students’ selection attributes of convenience food focused on satisfaction and purchasing intention. Korean J. Hotel Admin. 2017, 26, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabri, K.N.; Johari, N.N.; Baba, N.; Abdullah, R.R. Ready to eat food attributes and consumer purchase intention towards 7-Eleven convenience foods. Hosp. Tour. Synerg. Creat. Innov. Res. 2013, 299–301. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Ready-to-eat-food-attributes-and-consumer-purchase-Sabri-Johari/1cef6dd2d874053f792bb98d19945d2b37cb030d (accessed on 22 June 2021).
- Hawa, A.; Taneja, N.; Kaliwala, S.; Gopani, S.; Maru, P.; Sharma, S.; Sharm, S.; Patel, S.; Patel, M.; Kanani, H. A Study on Consumer Purchase Intention Towards Ready-to-Eat Food in Ahmedabad. Asian J. Manag. Res. 2014, 5, 202–209. [Google Scholar]
- Yunus, N.S.N.M.; Rashid, W.E.W.; Ariffin, N.M.; Rashid, N.M. Muhamad. Muslim’s Purchase Intention towards Non-Muslim’s Halal Packaged Food Manufacturer. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 130, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Worldometers. Viet. Popul. Worldometers. 2019. Available online: https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/vietnam-population/ (accessed on 2 September 2019).
- Choe, J.Y.J.; Kim, S.S. Development and validation of a multidimensional tourist’s local food consumption value (TLFCV) scale. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 77, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.Y.; Moon, B.J. A study on the development of consumer value scale of PB. J. Channel Retail. Res. 2018, 23, 25–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyerly, J.E.; Reeve, C.L. Development and validation of a measure of food choice values. Appetite 2015, 89, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, S.H. The Level of Importance of Well-being Foods and the Level of Satisfaction Depending on Married Women’s Lifestyle. J. Fam. Resour. Manag. 2010, 14, 239–262. [Google Scholar]
- Jeon, S.S.; Kim, S.K.; Jeon, G.Y. Influence of the Son-in-Law’s Orientation toward Family Based on Support Consciousness and Support Burden towards the Mother-in-Law. Korean J. Fam. Welf. 2012, 17, 137–152. [Google Scholar]
- Han, J.S.; Yoo, G.S. The effects of employees’ gender role attitudes, job involvement, and family involvement on work-family balance. J. Korean Home Manag. Assoc. 2007, 25, 143–166. [Google Scholar]
- Cronbach, L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16, 297–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauser, M.; Nussbeck, F.W.; Jonas, K. The impact of food-related values on food purchase behavior and the mediating role of attitudes: A Swiss study. Psychol. Mark. 2013, 30, 765–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, Y.S.; Hong, C.E. Effects of HMR Attributes on Purchase Intention according to Food Life Style. Int. J. Tour. Manag. Sci. 2017, 32, 353–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H.; Ryu, K.S. The effects of consumption value to HMR brand on brand satisfaction, brand trust, and brand loyalty. J. Foodserv. Manag. 2014, 17, 135–160. [Google Scholar]
- Park, J.A.; Jang, Y.S. The study on consumer beliefs about selection attributes of home meal replacement (HMR) and purchasing intention biases for the HMR. J. Foodserv. Manag. 2017, 20, 101–126. [Google Scholar]
- Ganesan, P.; Sridhar, M.; Priyadharsani, S. Reciprocal relationship and the mediating role between dimensions of attitude towards advertisement (Aad), brand attitude (Abr) and purchase intention (PI)-A case study of ready-to-eat food products. J. Contemp. Manag. Res. 2017, 11, 25–53. [Google Scholar]
- Margariti, K. “White” Space and Organic Claims on Food Packaging: Communicating Sustainability Values and Affecting Young Adults’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Category | Item | n (%) |
---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 161 (49.2) |
Female | 166 (50.8) | |
Age | 19–24 | 85 (26.0) |
25–29 | 78 (23.8) | |
30–34 | 85 (26.0) | |
35 or above | 79 (24.2) | |
Marital status | Married | 218 (66.7) |
Single | 105 (32.1) | |
Separated | 3 (0.9) | |
Divorced | 1 (0.3) | |
Education | High school graduate or lower | 47 (14.4) |
Junior college graduate | 38 (11.6) | |
University graduate | 224 (68.5) | |
Graduate student or higher | 18 (5.5) | |
Occupation | Self-employed | 20 (9.8) |
Labor staff | 21 (6.4) | |
Professional practice | 234 (71.6) | |
Freelancer | 6 (1.8) | |
Student | 34 (10.4) | |
Monthly income (VND 100,000) (VND 100,000 = 4.4 USD) | 45~<75 | 45 (13.8) |
75~<150 | 88 (26.9) | |
150~<300 | 116 (35.5) | |
300~<450 | 54 (16.5) | |
450≤ | 24 (7.3) | |
Total | 327 (100.0) |
Construct | Measurement Item | |
---|---|---|
Family | FCV1 | When buying food, I think about my family. |
FCV2 | When buying food, my family’s opinions matter. | |
FCV3 | My family’s dietary habits affect me. | |
FCV4 | My healthy dietary habits can protect my family’s health as well. | |
FCV5 | Dining with family is important in my life. | |
FCV6 | I buy good food for my family even if it is expensive. | |
Cost-effectiveness | FCV7 | When choosing food, I consider taste important. |
FCV8 | When buying food, I consider my financial situation. | |
FCV9 | When buying food, I consider whether it is reasonably priced. | |
FCV10 | When buying food, I compare price to product quality. | |
FCV11 | When choosing food, I consider the amount important. | |
FCV12 | When choosing food, I consider diversity important. | |
Health | FCV13 | When choosing food, I care about the calories. |
FCV14 | When choosing food, I consider the fat content. | |
FCV15 | When choosing food, I care about how it would affect my weight. | |
FCV16 | When choosing food, I consider the sugar content. | |
FCV17 | When choosing food, I consider the sodium content. | |
Safety | FCV18 | When choosing food, strict management of food safety is important. |
FCV19 | When choosing food, I check whether additives are used. | |
FCV20 | When choosing food, I consider protection against bacteria or viruses. | |
FCV21 | When choosing food, I consider whether synthetic substances are added. | |
FCV22 | When choosing food, I consider protection against food poisoning. | |
Time Saving | FCV23 | I prefer to spend as little time as possible to prepare food. |
FCV24 | I prefer food that can be quickly prepared. | |
FCV25 | It is a waste to spend a long-time preparing food. | |
FCV26 | I prefer to have some time to myself over preparing food or cleaning up. | |
Convenience | FCV27 | When choosing food, I prefer the ones that are easy to store and keep. |
FCV28 | Ideal food is something that I can easily have anytime and anywhere. | |
FCV29 | I prefer food that is easy to prepare and clean up. | |
Reliability | 1 | Korean HMR products are generally excellent. |
2 | Korean HMR products are reliable in taste. | |
3 | Korean HMR products are reliable in quality. | |
4 | Korean HMR products use safe ingredients. | |
Intention to Purchase | 1 | I would like to keep buying and eating Korean HMRs in the future. |
2 | I would like to recommend Korean HMRs to families and/or friends. | |
3 | I would like to say positive things about Korean HMRs to other people. | |
4 | I would like to buy and eat Korean HMRs, though the price is raised. |
Family | Cost−Effectiveness | Health | Safety | Time Saving | Convenience | Cronbach’s α | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCV1 | 0.865 | 0.107 | 0.023 | 0.191 | −0.047 | 0.041 | 0.918 |
FCV2 | 0.854 | 0.151 | 0.034 | 0.111 | −0.022 | 0.134 | |
FCV3 | 0.828 | 0.193 | 0.132 | 0.142 | −0.038 | 0.084 | |
FCV4 | 0.813 | 0.085 | 0.067 | 0.304 | −0.045 | 0.008 | |
FCV5 | 0.808 | 0.157 | 0.135 | 0.192 | −0.050 | 0.063 | |
FCV6 | 0.688 | 0.082 | 0.148 | 0.059 | 0.228 | −0.032 | |
FCV7 | 0.126 | 0.811 | 0.062 | 0.228 | 0.059 | 0.109 | 0.887 |
FCV8 | 0.194 | 0.804 | −0.016 | 0.179 | 0.019 | 0.040 | |
FCV9 | 0.185 | 0.769 | 0.077 | 0.306 | 0.077 | 0.078 | |
FCV10 | 0.071 | 0.728 | 0.050 | 0.361 | 0.055 | 0.120 | |
FCV11 | 0.120 | 0.666 | 0.298 | 0.104 | 0.135 | 0.188 | |
FCV12 | 0.121 | 0.640 | 0.274 | 0.057 | 0.055 | 0.188 | |
FCV13 | 0.043 | 0.117 | 0.828 | 0.022 | 0.108 | 0.100 | 0.891 |
FCV14 | −0.001 | 0.135 | 0.810 | 0.112 | 0.051 | 0.189 | |
FCV15 | 0.184 | 0.095 | 0.797 | 0.207 | 0.074 | −0.008 | |
FCV16 | 0.143 | 0.066 | 0.781 | 0.087 | 0.104 | 0.138 | |
FCV17 | 0.112 | 0.113 | 0.764 | 0.270 | 0.043 | 0.095 | |
FCV18 | 0.195 | 0.296 | 0.103 | 0.801 | 0.045 | 0.049 | 0.902 |
FCV19 | 0.256 | 0.273 | 0.093 | 0.790 | 0.060 | 0.106 | |
FCV20 | 0.255 | 0.259 | 0.204 | 0.734 | 0.008 | 0.153 | |
FCV21 | 0.170 | 0.165 | 0.382 | 0.682 | 0.056 | 0.148 | |
FCV22 | 0.279 | 0.292 | 0.172 | 0.675 | 0.027 | 0.162 | |
FCV23 | −0.011 | 0.106 | 0.129 | 0.016 | 0.881 | 0.120 | 0.835 |
FCV24 | 0.000 | 0.113 | −0.020 | 0.038 | 0.875 | 0.106 | |
FCV25 | −0.061 | 0.003 | 0.228 | −0.064 | 0.851 | 0.096 | |
FCV26 | 0.068 | 0.054 | 0.030 | 0.146 | 0.782 | 0.210 | |
FCV27 | 0.053 | 0.146 | 0.170 | 0.149 | 0.234 | 0.833 | 0.821 |
FCV28 | 0.086 | 0.167 | 0.140 | 0.119 | 0.214 | 0.819 | |
FCV29 | 0.102 | 0.281 | 0.218 | 0.187 | 0.149 | 0.679 | |
Eigenvalue | 4.45 | 3.95 | 3.85 | 3.48 | 3.14 | 2.20 | |
Variance explained | 15.33 | 13.60 | 13.15 | 12.01 | 10.82 | 7.59 |
Reliability | Intention to Purchase | Cronbach’s α | |
---|---|---|---|
Reliability1 | 0.818 | 0.311 | 0.91 |
Reliability2 | 0.808 | 0.410 | |
Reliability3 | 0.799 | 0.394 | |
Reliability4 | 0.810 | 0.312 | |
Intention to Purchase1 | 0.312 | 0.808 | 0.91 |
Intention to Purchase2 | 0.390 | 0.808 | |
Intention to Purchase3 | 0.360 | 0.832 | |
Intention to Purchase4 | 0.331 | 0.763 | |
Eigenvalue | 3.11 | 3.10 | |
Variance explained | 38.83 | 38.71 |
Construct | Correlation among Constructs | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Family Value | Cost-Effectiveness Value | Health Value | Safety Value | Time Saving Value | Convenience Value | |
Family value | 1.00 | |||||
Cost-effectiveness value | 0.42 (0.04) | 1.00 | ||||
Health value | 0.28 (0.04) | 0.36 (0.04) | 1.00 | |||
Safety value | 0.55 (0.05) | 0.68 (0.05) | 0.47 (0.04) | 1.00 | ||
Time Saving value | 0.01 (0.04) | 0.21 (0.03) | 0.26 (0.04) | 0.14 (0.04) | 1.00 | |
Convenience value | 0.24 (0.04) | 0.47 (0.04) | 0.44 (0.05) | 0.45 (0.05) | 0.45 (0.05) | 1.00 |
AVE | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.64 |
Composite reliability for latent constructs | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.76 |
Hypothesis | Path Coefficient | C.R. | Result |
---|---|---|---|
H1. Family value → reliability | 0.09 | 1.57 | Rejected |
H2. Cost-effectiveness value → reliability | 0.06 | 0.69 | Rejected |
H3. Health value → reliability | 0.18 ** | 2.79 | Accepted |
H4. Safety value → reliability | 0.22 * | 2.48 | Accepted |
H5. Time-saving value → reliability | 0.13 * | 2.07 | Accepted |
H6. Convenience value → reliability | 0.29 *** | 4.08 | Accepted |
H7. Reliability → intention to purchase | 0.76 *** | 12.91 | Accepted |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Choi, S.; Lee, T.J.; Hong, W. Effect of Food Consumption Values of Vietnamese Consumers on the Reliability and Purchase Intention of Korean Home Meal Replacements. Sustainability 2022, 14, 736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020736
Choi S, Lee TJ, Hong W. Effect of Food Consumption Values of Vietnamese Consumers on the Reliability and Purchase Intention of Korean Home Meal Replacements. Sustainability. 2022; 14(2):736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020736
Chicago/Turabian StyleChoi, Seunggyun, Timothy J. Lee, and Wansoo Hong. 2022. "Effect of Food Consumption Values of Vietnamese Consumers on the Reliability and Purchase Intention of Korean Home Meal Replacements" Sustainability 14, no. 2: 736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020736
APA StyleChoi, S., Lee, T. J., & Hong, W. (2022). Effect of Food Consumption Values of Vietnamese Consumers on the Reliability and Purchase Intention of Korean Home Meal Replacements. Sustainability, 14(2), 736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020736