Next Article in Journal
Foreign Direct Investment and Air Pollution: Re-Estimating the “Pollution Haven Hypothesis” in China
Next Article in Special Issue
AI in E-Commerce: Application of the Use and Gratification Model to The Acceptance of Chatbots
Previous Article in Journal
The Instrumentality of Public-Private Partnerships for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals
Previous Article in Special Issue
How Attachment and Community Identification Affect User Stickiness in Social Commerce: A Consumer Engagement Experience Perspective
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Measurement Model and Empirical Analysis of the Coordinated Development of Rural E-Commerce Logistics and Agricultural Modernization

Sustainability 2022, 14(21), 13758; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113758
by Zhiqiang Liu 1, Shitong Jia 1, Zixing Wang 2, Caiyun Guo 1,* and Yanqi Niu 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Sustainability 2022, 14(21), 13758; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113758
Submission received: 18 September 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 21 October 2022 / Published: 24 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue E-commerce and Sustainability (Second Volume))

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see attached report. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

A Measurement Model and Empirical Analysis of Coordinated Development of Rural E-commerce Logistics and Agricultural Modernization. This research applied  Grey prediction GM (1,1) model to forecasting and found that the coordinated development of rural e-commerce logistics and agricultural modernization will achieve good coordination in 2024. The research build strategy obstacle factors analysis, and trend prediction of coordinated development of regional rural e-commerce logistics and agricultural modernization in Handan City, Hebei Province China. After reading this paper, I have some suggestions for the author as follows:

1. Still have some errors typing Ex: Lines 55~57; 62~63, 66, 96~97. 379.

2. The literature review of the research topic is too weak, mainly listing issues without sound analysis and evaluation.

3. Grammar and sentence structure.

4. The reference format needs a double check, it is still a mistake.

5. What is the difference between e-commerce logistics and Agriculture Logistics?

6. What does it mean "In order to avoid the data of a standardized index is 0 and affect the subsequent calculation" the author mention?

7. Why the author decided to do steps (1) and (2) before doing forecasting? Please explain clearly how to calculate it. Which research did the author citation it?

8. Why authors integrated entropy method, system comprehensive development index, system coupling coordination degree, obstacle degree, and Grey (1,1). Please explain it. Cause this step is an implication of this research. What is the advantage if the author applied it? Normally in the previous research, they just apply Grey (1,1) to forecasting. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

ð 1. The reference format needs a double check, it is still have some mistake.

ð 2. There is no clear explanation give about the data used in the model - include a data section with clear reference made to the source of the data and the period covered. Please explain each step of the Formulas (1) - (9) in this research "4.2. The calculation of coupling coordination-obstacle degree" and how to calculate each step, Cause this is the implication in your research.

 

ð I hope the authors can improve this research

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 3

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Author,

Good luck to your team. Thanks for your contribution to this research.

Back to TopTop