Next Article in Journal
Citizens’ Social Participation to Implement Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Literature Review
Next Article in Special Issue
What Makes People Pay Premium Price for Eco-Friendly Products? The Effects of Ethical Consumption Consciousness, CSR, and Product Quality
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Social Networking Services on Tourists’ Intention to Visit Mega-Events during the Riyadh Season: A Theory of Planned Behavior Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Study on Factors Affecting the Value Co-Creation Behavior of Customers in Sharing Economy: Take Airbnb Malaysia as an Example
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 14
Issue 21
10.3390/su142114486
Review Report
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Validating Antecedent Factors Affecting Ethical Purchase Behavior: Comparing the Effect of Customer Citizenship versus Corporate Citizenship

Sustainability 2022, 14(21), 14486; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114486
by Huiya Chen 1,*, Wonsik Jung 2 and Sungjoon Yoon 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Mina Jo
Reviewer 3:
Marcin Komańda
Sustainability 2022, 14(21), 14486; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114486
Submission received: 23 September 2022 / Revised: 20 October 2022 / Accepted: 31 October 2022 / Published: 4 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marketing Innovation and Consumer Values in Sustainable Business Strategy)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

ABSTRACT: In the abstract, it should be given a better explanation concerning the objectives of the study since it is not clear at the moment. Moreover, the term “subjective norm” should be clarified.

INTRODUCTION: The concept of “customer citizenship” should be clarified and supported by further references.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION: The study appears heavily "theoretical" and practical implications could be missing; hence, if any, the actual contributions to scholarship should be simplified and clearly expressed, otherwise the "so what?" effect could emerge.

 

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

- Extensive editing of English language and style required.

- Add a research method to the Abstract, and describe the implication in detail.

- Table 3 needs to be modified.

 

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Reviewed paper represents high quality scholar work. The topic seems important for management in terms of marketing and business social responsibility. Well built structure of paper content allows the reader to understand theoretical background of discussed problems and foundations of research model construction. The authors refer to significant literature sources in the scope of their approach to the study. Methodology and results sections provide necessary information and data. Conducted analysis does not raise any objections. Limitations and future research directions are correctly formulated. 

However some improvement proposals may be indicated:

- final part of results discussion needs graphical representation of validated research model (in relation to figure 1);

- references to the literature presented in the text  are significant for the paper content, however their don't discuss the latest research results; the latest cited article comes from 2013; there is a need to incorporate wider context of the newest research results published in international journals (coming from the last two/three years). 

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

* This paper has been faithfully revised according to the comments of the reviewer.

Back to TopTop