Exploring Green Office Building Choices by Corporate Tenants in Malaysia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Green Office Buildings and Sustainability Movement in Kuala Lumpur
2.2. Locational Decision Making: Neo-Classical and Behavioural Approaches
2.3. Demands for Green Office Building
3. Methodology
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Data Collection
3.3. Data Analysis
3.4. Case Study and Profiles of Respondents
3.5. Mind Map for the Case Study
4. Results
4.1. Location
4.1.1. Case Study 1 (City Centre)
4.1.2. Case Study 2 (Suburban Analysis)
4.1.3. Summary of Findings under Location
4.2. Finance and Cost
4.2.1. Case Study 1 (City Centre)
4.2.2. Case Study 2 (Suburban)
4.2.3. Summary of Findings under Finance and Cost
4.3. Building Features
4.3.1. Case Study 1 (City Centre)
4.3.2. Case Study 2 (Suburban)
4.3.3. Summary of Findings under Building Features
Green Certification Helps to Improve the Image and Branding of the Organisation
Energy Efficiency Reduces the Cost of Operations and Other Services
4.4. Health and Wellbeing
4.4.1. Case Study 1 (City Centre)
4.4.2. Case Study 2 (Suburban)
4.4.3. Summary of Findings under Health and Well-Being
4.5. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
4.5.1. Case Study 1 (City Centre)
4.5.2. Case Study 2 (Suburban)
4.5.3. Summary of Findings under Corporate Social Responsibility
Mission and Vision towards Sustainability
Corporate Social Responsibility towards Sustainability
4.6. Image and Branding
4.6.1. Case Study 1 (City Centre)
4.6.2. Case Study 2 (Suburban)
4.6.3. Summary of Findings under Image and Branding
4.7. Findings from the Cross-Case Study
4.7.1. External Pressure from the Company Headquarters (HQ)
4.7.2. Large Organisations Occupation of Green Office Space
4.7.3. Development of Information and Technology Communication (ICT)
4.7.4. Decentralisation of Organisations with Specialised Function
4.7.5. Additional Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Levy, D.; Peterson, G. The effect of sustainability on commercial occupiers’ building choice. J. Prop. Investig. Financ. 2013, 31, 267–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nappi-Choulet, I.; Decamps, A. Can Sustainability Enhance Business District Attractiveness? A Survey of Corporate Property Decisions in France. Urban Stud. 2013, 50, 3283–3304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malgorzata Zieba, S.; Belniak, G.M. Demand for sustainable office space in Poland: The results from conjoint experiment in Krakow. Prop. Manag. 2013, 31, 404–419. [Google Scholar]
- Nicola, L.; Jessica, F. Occupier responses to sustainable real estate: What’s next? J. Corp. Real Estate 2017, 19, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamid, Z.A.; Roslan, A.F.; Ali, M.C.; Hung, F.C.; Noor, M.S.M.; Kilau, N.M. Towards A National Green Building Rating System for Malaysia. Malays. Constr. Res. J. 2014, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Roback, J. Wages, Rents, and Amenities: Differences among Workers and Regions. Econ. Inq. 1988, 26, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clapp, J.M. The Intrametropoliton Location of Office Activities. J. Reg. Sci. 1980, 20, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leishman, C.; Watkins, C. The decision-making behaviour of office occupiers. J. Prop. Invest. Financ. 2004, 22, 307–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenhalgh, P. An Examination of Business Occupier Relocation Decision Making: Distinguishing Small and Large Organisation Behaviour. J. Prop. Res. 2008, 25, 107–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agboola, A.O. Neoclassical economics and new institutional economics: An assessment of their methodological implication for property market analysis. Prop. Manag. 2015, 33, 412–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rymarzak, M.; Siemińska, E. Factors affecting the location of real estate. J. Corp. Real Estate 2012, 14, 214–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, S.; Simons, R.; Lee, E.; Kern, A. Demand for green buildings: Office tenants’ stated willingness-to-pay for green features. J. Real Estate Res. 2016, 38, 423–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leaman, A.; Bordass, B. Productivity in buildings: The ‘killer variables’. Build. Res. Inf. 1999, 27, 4–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohueri, C.C.; Enegbuma, W.I.; Kenley, R. Energy efficiency practices for Malaysian green office building occupants. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 2018, 8, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaid, S.M.; Kiani Rad, A.; Zainon, N. Are green offices better than conventional? Facilities 2017, 35, 622–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaid, S.M.; Kiani, A. Energy prediction versus energy performance of green buildings in Malaysia. Comparison of predicted and operational measurement of GBI certified green office in Kuala Lumpur. In MATEC Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2016; Volume 66, p. 00071. [Google Scholar]
- Dwaikat, L.N.; Ali, K.N. The economic benefits of a green building–Evidence from Malaysia. J. Build. Eng. 2018, 18, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andelin, M.; Sarasoja, A.L.; Ventovuori, T.; Junnila, S. Breaking the circle of blame for green buildings—Evidence from Nordic countries. J. Corp. Real Estate 2015, 17, 26–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiley, J.A.; Benefield, J.D.; Johnson, K.H. Green Design and the Market for Commercial Office Space. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 2010, 41, 228–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larson, B. Metaphors for Environmental Sustainability: Redefining our Relationship with Nature; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Jailani, J.; Reed, R.; James, K. Examining the perception of tenants in sustainable office buildings. Prop. Manag. 2015, 33, 386–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khan, M.A.; Wang, C.C.; Lee, C.L. A framework for developing green building rating tools based on Pakistan’s local context. Buildings 2021, 11, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pivo, G.; Fisher, J. Income, value, and returns in socially responsible office properties. J. Real Estate Res. 2010, 32, 243–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellison, L.; Sayce, S. Assessing sustainability in the existing commercial property stock: Establishing sustainability criteria relevant for the commercial property investment sector. Prop. Manag. 2007, 25, 287–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komolafe, M.O.; Oyewole, M.O.; Kolawole, J.T. Extent of incorporation of green features in office properties in Lagos, Nigeria. Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 2016, 5, 232–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feige, A.; Wallbaum, H.; Janser, M.; Windlinger, L. Impact of sustainable office buildings on occupant’s comfort and productivity. J. Corp. Real Estate 2013, 15, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, Z.; Cole, R.J. Influence of occupants’ knowledge on comfort expectations and behaviour. Build. Res. Inf. 2010, 37, 227–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayce, S.; Smith, J.; Cooper, R.; Venmore-Rowland, P. Real Estate Appraisal: From Value to Worth; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Fisk, W.J.; Rosenfeld, A.H. Estimates of improved productivity and health from better indoor environments. Indoor Air 1997, 7, 158–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S.; Vredenburg, H. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organisationsal capabilities. Strateg. Manag. J. 1998, 19, 729–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashid, M.; Spreckelmeyer, K.; Angrisano, N.J. Green buildings, environmental awareness, and organisationsal image. J. Corp. Real Estate 2012, 14, 21–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cajias, M.; Fuerst, F.; Bienert, S. Can investing in corporate social responsibility lower a company’s cost of capital? Stud. Econ. Financ. 2014, 31, 202–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dixon, T.; Ennis-Reynolds, G.; Roberts, C.; Sims, S. Is there a demand for sustainable offices? An analysis of UK business occupier moves (2006–2008). J. Prop. Res. 2009, 26, 61–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myers, G.; Reed, R.; Robinson, J. The Relationship between Sustainability and the Value of Office Buildings. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Pacific Rim Real Estate Conference, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia, 21–24 January 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Andrea, C.; Piet, E.; Nils, K. Supply, Demand and the Value of Green Buildings. Urban Stud. J. Ltd. 2014, 51, 22–43. [Google Scholar]
- Boldy, P.; Barnes, L. CSR Initiatives for Green Buildings: Perspectives of Hong Kong Financial Institutions. In Responsible Management in Asia: Perspectives on CSR; Williams, G., Ed.; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2008; pp. 203–222. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J.Y.; Roh, T. Open for green innovation? From the perspective of green process and green consumer in-novation. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roh, T.; Lee, K.; Yang, J.Y. How do intellectual property rights and government support drive a firm’s green innovation? The mediating role of open innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 317, 128422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roh, T.; Noh, J.; Oh, Y.; Park, K.S. Structural relationships of a firm’s green strategies for environmental performance: The roles of green supply chain management and green marketing innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 356, 131877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toffler, A.E. The Third Wave; Preager: New York, NY, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Saunders, M.; Lewis, P.; Thornhill, A. Research Methods for Business Students; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organisational Research; Applied Social Research Methods Series; SAGE Publications: London, UK, 2009; p. 219. [Google Scholar]
- Tellis, W.M. Introduction to Case Study. Qual. Rep. 1997, 3, 1–14. Available online: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol3/iss2/4 (accessed on 25 June 2018). [CrossRef]
- Miles, M.B.; Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Marshall, M.N. Sampling for qualitative research. Fam. Pract. 1996, 13, 522–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragan, I.; Isaic-Maniu, A. Snowball sampling Completion. J. Stud. Soc. Sci. 2013, 5, 160–177. [Google Scholar]
- Guest, G.; Bunce, A.; Johnson, L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 2006, 18, 59–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisenhardt, K.M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1989, 14, 532–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coffrey, W.J.; Shearmur, R.G. Agglomeration and dispersion of high-order service employment in the Montreal metropolitan region, 1981–1996. Urban Stud. 2002, 39, 359–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anas, A.; Arnott, R.; Small, K.A. Urban spatial structure. J. Econ. Lit. 1998, 36, 1426–1464. [Google Scholar]
- McMillen, D.P.; McDonald, J.F. Suburban subcenters and employment density in metropolitan Chicago. J. Urban Econ. 1998, 43, 157–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sivitanidou, R. Do office–commercial firms value access to service employment centers? A hedonic value analysis within polycentric Los Angeles. J. Urban Econ. 1996, 40, 125–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ball, S.; Macrae, S.; Maguire, M. Choice, Pathways and Transitions Post-16: New Youth, New Economies in the Global City; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
Theme | Author |
---|---|
Building Features | Nappi-Choulet, I. and Decamps, Aurelien [2] Zieba, Belniak and Gluszak [15] Andelin, M., Sarasoja, A.L., Ventovuori, [16] Jailani, Reed and James [23] Khan, Wang and Lee [22] |
Cost and Financial | Zieba, Belniak and Gluszak [15] Pivo and Fisher [24] Feige, Wallbaum, Janser and Windlinger [27] Brown and Cole [28] Sayce, Smith, Cooper and Venmore-Rowland [29] |
Health and Wellbeing | Feige, Wallbaum, Janser and Windlinger [27]. Sayce, Smith, Cooper and Venmore-Rowland [29] Fiskand Rosenfeld [30] Sharma and Vredenburg [31] |
Image and Branding | Zieba, Belniak and Gluszak [15] Rashid, Spreckelmeyer and Angrisano [32] Cajias and Fuerst [33] |
Corporate Social Responsibility | Robinson, Simons, Lee and Kern [12] Sayce, Smith, Cooper and Venmore-Rowland [29] Fiskand Rosenfeld [30] Dixon, Ennis-Reynolds, Roberts and Sims [34] Boldy and Barnes [36] Andrea, Piet and Nils [37]. Myers, Reed and Robinson [40] Yang and Roh [37] Roh, Li, Yang [38] Roh, Noh, Oh, Park [39] |
Respondent | Location | Structure of Organisation | Sustainability Mission and Vision | Type of Organisation | Size Organisation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RS1 | Suburban | Sewerage and Collection Service | Yes | Local Organisation | Medium |
RC2 | City Centre | Oil and Gas | Yes | Foreign Organisation | Large |
RC3 | City Centre | Construction | Yes | Foreign Organisation | Large |
RC4 | City Centre | Construction | Yes | Foreign Organisation | Large |
RC5 | City Centre | Finance | Yes | Local Organisation | Large |
RS6 | Suburban | Information Technology | Yes | Foreign Organisation | Large |
RC7 | City Centre | Naval Technology | Yes | Foreign Organisation | Medium |
RS8 | Suburban | Finance | Yes | Foreign Organisation | Large |
RS9 | Suburban | Information Technology | Yes | Foreign Organisation | Medium |
RS10 | Suburban | Information Technology | No | Foreign Organisation | Medium |
RC11 | City Centre | Insurance | Yes | Local Organisation | Large |
RS12 | Suburban | Food and Beverage | Yes | Local Organisation | Large |
RC13 | City Centre | Information Technology | Yes | Foreign Organisation | Medium |
Respondents | Responses |
---|---|
RC2 | “The proximity to public transportation and it is proximity to major highly access within from vicinity [...]”. |
RC3 | “[…] Whether location has all the infrastructures and by occupying in a green building that is accessible is a bonus to us […]”. |
RC4 | “[…] has selected this building specifically because of its strategic location, lots of our staffs drive to work, they choose the building that close to the bus stop, close to train station and it’s a so walkable area to city centre […]” |
RC7 | “As a big organisation, we want clients and not just the employee can come to the office easily, either by car or public transport […]. Even though the accessibility is good and most of our staff live outside KL and they are prone to use the car rather than use the public transport […]” |
RC11 | “[…] it is very convenient for us to centralise at downtown, transportation here is very good with the LRT, monorail, trains. As organisation is a general insurance, motor insurance and all that and of course […], we do have expatriates’ staff that have found the location to be convenient […] to go to the airport very easily.” |
Respondents | Responses |
---|---|
RS1 | “Accessibility is not too good here. Before we have the MRT, there is only bus here. Good to have the MRT.” |
RS8 | “We choose here because of location. It’s the centre of the town and near LRT. As we don’t usually deal with local client, we would have a lot of overseas clients, so access from KLIA is an important …”. |
RS9 | “[…] usually, when we go out from our buildings, we would see a highway outside. This building is located in an area not surrounded by highways but walkways…” |
RS12 | “Accessibility as we have a lot of people coming from two ends one from KL” |
RS6 | “This place is very strategic for people to access, for the building itself, it is located beside highway, very accessible” |
RS10 | “[…] surrounding area, that has LRT as well as medical clinic, shopping mall, market which is reachable […]” |
Respondents | Responses |
---|---|
RC11 | “By moving to the energy saving building and cost effective…for being going green. Although the rent is quite expensive, we do not have to pay for the encumbrance and hidden charges […]”. |
RC2 | “It would be rent…cost, in terms of building, this building has certification, GBI and the rent is suitable for this office space.” |
RC3 | “Benefit is for sustainability, in terms of cost saving, in terms of the saving the environment for the future generation […]”. |
RC7 | “[…] because of location and charges applied (cost)” |
RC4 | “[…] it’s not so much about the cost, occupying green office has been considered in the budget.” |
RC11 | “Well in term of this one, ensuring that maintenance will be kept to the standard, ensure that the building management is able to give us what has been expected […]”. |
RC4 | “Sustainability is about how you sustain, in terms of operating costs… how to manage sustainability, energy efficiency, waste management […]” |
Respondents | Responses |
---|---|
RS10 | “From my perspective; for business, the cost is important for the organisation, as the cost cover the rental and maintenance” |
RS9 | “[…] I think the rental rate is quite expensive; We must pay for electricity after working hours and it is costly […].” |
RS1 | “[…], for business, the budget has been set”. |
RS6 | “[…] agree with that price [rental], as it is accepted” |
Respondents | Responses |
---|---|
RC11 | “[…] this certification is good with the certification and all that […]”“the security it itself is so good, we have the auxiliary police, it is so good […]”.“[….] energy saving itself with sensors”. |
RC 4 | “[…] The aspirations come from this office space and its green platinum certification. “The energy saving, and we believe in term of green building, the air-conditioning in the room is in optimal mode […]”. |
RC7 | “The condition is very clean and the automatic system for the air conditioning and light system…”.“Green office building is more modernised, and it has good security which is provided by the building”. |
RC2 | “Safety has very high priority […]. When we go to certain building we go through safety, infrastructures that are available in the building” |
Respondents | Responses |
---|---|
RS1 | “Security here is very tight […]” |
RS10 | “Safety, […], CCTV, fire control and system […]”. |
RS9 | “[…] the security here, with a CCTV […]” |
Respondents | Responses |
---|---|
RC4 | “Workers’ health and wellbeing […] is making people feel comfortable and healthy, “[…] would mean higher productivity higher […] people don’t fall sick and save the company some money” |
Respondents | Responses |
---|---|
RS1 | “[…] as the environment is comfortable, […] definitely it places the roles for motivation for this company […]”. |
RS12 | “The green building is related to the productivity and healthiness of occupiers and it will reduce the cost for the organisation by investing in the green office building” |
Respondents | Responses |
---|---|
RC3 | “in terms of the overall group, we have a CSR initiative to go green. […], some activities that we have for communities” |
RC7 | “[…] our organisation in France (HQ) is focusing towards sustainability […] Since we are focusing towards that [sustainability] and we want to create compatible service through community activities involvement”. |
Respondents | Responses |
---|---|
RS1 | “Firstly, it is a group direction” |
RS6 | “[…] have to maintain CSR, have external activity […], not to pose as a danger to the environment” |
RS12 | “[….] we have a corporate social responsibility which we undertake through our employee engagement. […] CSR programme include […] beach cleaning, tree planting” |
Respondents | Responses |
---|---|
RC11 | “[…] We move here because we want to show where we are [….] we want to elevate our status in this business” |
RC4 | “[…] in terms of an image, it is not about money, it’s about building the reputation of our organisation” |
Respondents | Responses |
---|---|
RS1 | “[…] good for them for recognition, marketing and publicity. The client will see where we occupy, not just an ordinary organisation, […] if you can rent or occupy a green office building, it can elevate the image” |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mohd Adnan, Y.; Mohd Arif, N.A.; Razali, M.N. Exploring Green Office Building Choices by Corporate Tenants in Malaysia. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14509. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114509
Mohd Adnan Y, Mohd Arif NA, Razali MN. Exploring Green Office Building Choices by Corporate Tenants in Malaysia. Sustainability. 2022; 14(21):14509. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114509
Chicago/Turabian StyleMohd Adnan, Yasmin, Nor Adibah Mohd Arif, and Muhammad Najib Razali. 2022. "Exploring Green Office Building Choices by Corporate Tenants in Malaysia" Sustainability 14, no. 21: 14509. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114509
APA StyleMohd Adnan, Y., Mohd Arif, N. A., & Razali, M. N. (2022). Exploring Green Office Building Choices by Corporate Tenants in Malaysia. Sustainability, 14(21), 14509. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114509