Next Article in Journal
Managing Ship’s Ballast Water: A Feasibility Assessment of Mobile Port-Based Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Postharvest Eucalyptus Leaf Extract Application Extends the Sustainable Supply of Strawberries by Retaining Physicochemical Quality during Cold Storage
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 14
Issue 22
10.3390/su142214826
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Larval Spatiotemporal Distribution of Six Fish Species: Implications for Sustainable Fisheries Management in the East China Sea

by
Min Xu
1,2,†,
Zunlei Liu
1,2,†,
Yihe Wang
3,4,
Yan Jin
1,2,
Xinwei Yuan
1,2,
Hui Zhang
1,2,
Xiaojing Song
1,2,
Takayoshi Otaki
5,
Linlin Yang
1,2,* and
Jiahua Cheng
1,2,*
1
Key Laboratory of East China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 200090, China
2
East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shanghai 200090, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
4
School of Marine Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
5
Japan Fisheries Information Service Center, Tokyo 104-0055, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Sustainability 2022, 14(22), 14826; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214826
Submission received: 28 August 2022 / Revised: 3 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 November 2022 / Published: 10 November 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The larval distributions of the small-sized fishes Omobranchus elegans, Erisphex pottii, Benthosema pterotum, Acropoma japonicum, Upeneus bensasi, and Apogonichthys lineatus in the East China Sea ecosystem are important due to their ecological and economic benefits. To date, however, there have been few studies describing their population distributions and dynamics. In the current study, ichthyoplankton surveys were carried out from April to July 2018 to analyze variations in the larval abundance, distribution, and development stages of these species. In addition, the spatiotemporal larval distribution was investigated in terms of measured environmental variables. It was found that larvae were mainly distributed at depths of 5.00–66.00 m, in areas with sea surface temperature of 4.40–29.60 °C, sea surface salinity of 16.54–34.60 psu, pH of 7.00–9.00, and dissolved oxygen concentration of 2.54–8.70 mg/L. Benthosema pterotum and A. lineatus migrated from 30.00–31.00° N 123.17–123.50° E in June to 30.00–32.50° N 122.22–123.50° E in July. The results of this study can help to preserve spawning and nursery grounds and contribute to sustainable coastal fisheries management.

1. Introduction

The East China Sea is one of the most productive and warming marginal seas in the world, which has also been over-exploited since the late 1980s by large fisheries [1]. The area is connected to terrestrial water, the Pacific Ocean, the Sea of Japan, and the Yellow Sea by a very complex ocean system, including both deep and shallow sea features [2]. Several water masses in this area are described as Changjiang river diluted water (CRDW), with low temperature and salinity, Taiwan Warm Current (TWC), with high temperature and salinity, Yellow Sea cold water mass, with low temperature and high salinity, and Subei coastal current, with high temperature and low salinity. Kuroshio current flows from eastern Taiwan, enters into the East China Sea region, and then flows along the continental shelf. The Taiwan warm current extends northward and outward from the central Zhejiang coast to the southern Changjiang estuary. The distribution characteristics of the ichthyoplankton assemblages in this area are very complex. Many factors, such as type of water mass, might influence the larval distribution in shelf waters.
Understanding the larval distributions of the fishes Omobranchus elegans, Erisphex pottii, Benthosema pterotum, Acropoma japonicum, Upeneus bensasi, and Apogonichthys lineatus is crucial for the maintenance and sustainable development of the East China Sea ecosystem. They are the most abundant fish groups in the East China Sea, which is one of the largest marginal seas in the western Pacific [3,4]. These fish are prey for larger economically important fishes such as Collichthys lucidus [5], Trichiurus japonicus [6], Aluterus monoceros [7], Larimichthys polyactis [8], Lophius litulon [8], Scomberomorus niphonius [8], Harpadon nehereus [9], Pennahia argentata [10], and Euthynnus affinis [11]. In recent years, the biomass of E. pottii, B. pterotum, A. lineatus, and A. japonicum has gradually increased from year to year, representing a major component of the trawl bycatch in the East China Sea [11,12]. Ecologically these six species play an important role, occupying intermediate trophic levels that link secondary production to the upper trophic levels of marine food webs in this region.
Globally, they are widely distributed in the continental shelf regions from the West Pacific to the Indian Ocean. Generally, they have a long spawning period, a short lifecycle of one year or less, and fast generation time [3,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. The spawning period of A. japonicum, U. bensasi, and A. lineatus is reported to be June to September with a peak in August [14], and January to September with a peak from June to September [13], and summer to autumn [15], respectively. The larvae of O. elegans are found from March to October with a peak in August [16]. The species U. bensasi and A. lineatus prefer to stay at depths of 30.00–120.00 m in areas with sandy substrates [13]. The trophic levels of B. pterotum, A. japonicum, and Apogonichthys lineatus are estimated to be 3.41, 3.48, and 3.39, respectively [17]. The biomass of B. pterotum, U. bensasi, and A. lineatus is estimated to be 2.30 million tonnes (MT) (carried out by acoustic surveys and trial fishing using pelagic trawls in 1992 to 1998 in the Oman Sea) [18], 880.82 tonnes (carried out by bottom trawls in 2003 in southwestern continental shelf of Nansha Islands) [19], and 0.14 MT (carried out by bottom trawls in 1997 to 2000 in the East China Sea) [8], respectively [20,21]. Benthosema pterotum is a recently introduced potential fisheries resource that can be utilized for the commercial production of fishmeal and oil [17,18,20].
Thus, it is necessary to understand the spatiotemporal variations in the early life history stages of these species in the East China Sea due to their importance in the ecological and economic aspects of sustainable ecosystem development. However, currently very few studies describe the spatiotemporal distributions and dynamics of the early life history of these species. In particular, there is a lack of in situ sampling over a large spatial region at a high resolution with a sampling grid of 0.50° N latitude and 0.167° E longitude. Information on the habitats of the larvae of these species remains unclear, especially in areas where trawl fishing is prohibited in the East China Sea. However, this information is essential to understand the structure and dynamics of the ecosystem, determining spawning and nursery grounds, and assessing population sizes. In this study, larvae of O. elegans, E. pottii, B. pterotum, A. japonicum, U. bensasi, and A. lineatus were collected in situ, on a monthly basis, as part of cruises over the continental shelf area (24.26–33.00° N 118.55–123.50° E; 133 sampling stations) from April to July 2018. The aims of this study were to describe the variations of occurrence of sampling stations, larval number, and development stages of these species, and to identify spatiotemporal distributions of larvae according to measured environmental variables (depth, water temperature, salinity, pH, and dissolved oxygen (DO)) from April to July 2018. The results will contribute to maintain ocean biodiversity and sustainable coastal fisheries management.

2. Materials and Methods

The study area covered the southern Yellow Sea and the northern East China Sea. The average depth of the southern Yellow Sea is 45.00 m. The study area included the Yellow Sea warm current and the Yellow Sea cold water mass [22]. As one of the largest marginal semi-enclosed sea areas in the western Pacific Ocean, the northern East China Sea is characterized by oceanic water with high salinity and diluted coastal water with low salinity [23]. Kuroshio current flows from eastern Taiwan, enters into the East China Sea region, and then flows along the continental shelf [24]. The Taiwan warm current extends northward and outward from the central Zhejiang coast to the southern Changjiang estuary.
Larvae of O. elegans, E. pottii, B. pterotum, A. japonicum, U. bensasi, and A. lineatus were collected in situ, on a monthly basis, as part of cruises over the continental shelf area (24.26–33.00° N 118.55–123.50° E; 133 sampling stations) from April to July 2018. The cruises were within the closed area for marine trawl fisheries in the southern Yellow Sea and the northern East China Sea and were carried out on fishing vessels (#Lanhai 201 and #Zhongkeyu 211) (Figure 1). The survey transects were perpendicular to the coastline of China, with a sampling grid of approximately 0.50° N latitude (0.25° latitude in a range of 30.50–31.50° N) and separated by a distance of 0.167°E longitude, moving progressively from west to east.
For sample collection, the engine of the survey vessel was stopped, and cone-shaped ichthyoplankton nets (130 cm diameter, 600 cm length, and 0.50 mm mesh size) were cast into the sea, equipped with a calibrated flowmeter mounted in the center of net mouth to measure flow rate. Near-surface discrete sampling was carried out with the top of the net ring just below the air–water interface for 10 min (“horizontal haul”). Near-bottom discrete sampling was carried out by towing the net from the near bottom to the near surface for 10 min, using a buoy line to adjust the desired depth (“oblique haul”). We used a SeaBird SBE−19 CTD at each site to record hydrographic parameters such as depth, water temperature, salinity, pH, and dissolved oxygen concentration. After the hauls, ichthyoplankton samples containing O. elegans, E. pottii, B. pterotum, A. japonicum, U. bensasi, and A. lineatus larvae were immediately washed into a stainless end collection cup with flowing seawater. The samples were preserved in situ in 5% buffered formaldehyde prepared in seawater for further analysis. Larvae from the samples were identified using morphological classification and enumerated in the laboratory using a stereomicroscope (ZEISS, Stemi 2000, Oberkochen, Germany). The developmental stages were divided into yolk-sac, preflexion, flexion, postflexion, and juvenile stages. The density of larvae in the ichthyoplankton samples was quantitatively converted to number per 100 m3 filtered seawater volume (unit: ind/100 m3).
We calculated the habitat suitability index (HSI) to investigate fish larval number distribution patterns of B. pterotum and A. lineatus in relation to selected measured hydrographic parameters, including depth (m), sea surface temperature (°C), sea bottom temperature (°C), sea surface salinity (psu), and sea bottom salinity (psu) in June and July 2018. HSI was obtained by comprehensive calculations of many number-based suitability index (SI) values [25]. Each SI was estimated as a value between 0.0 and 1.0. The SIs were estimated as follows:
S I = Y − Y m i n Y m a x − Y m i n
where Y is larvae number after smoothed regression and Ymax and Ymin are maximum and minimum predicted values. A SI value is closer to 1.0 means a higher suitability index, and a SI value closer to 0.0 means a lower suitability index. SI values between 0.7 and 1.0 correspond to environmental factors that are regarded as the most suitable environment range [26].
We calculated HSI values using the equation given below:
H S I = 1 ∑ i = 1 n w i · ∑ i = 1 n S I i w i
where HSI is habitat suitability index, SIi is the SI value of the environmental variable, i and wi are the weight of the environmental variable, and i, and n are the number of environmental factors [27].
Finally, a hydrodynamic numerical model was applied to simulate salinity and sea temperature structures. Based on the original estuarine, coastal and ocean models [28], the State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University developed and improved the model [29]. A third-order HSIMT advection scheme was used to solve the tracer advection terms [29]. The model domain covered the entire Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and Bohai Sea, as well as part of the Pacific Ocean and the Japan Sea. The mesh grid with a resolution of ~1 km or higher was refined to 367 × 319 based on previous studies inside the Changjiang River Estuary and 2–4 km east and south of the Changjiang River mouth [30]. The model previously was validated comprehensively and performed in reproducing multi-scale salinity, temperature, and current distribution structures reasonably [31,32,33,34,35,36].

3. Results

3.1. Positive Sampling Stations and Larval Number

The positive sampling stations number range of O. elegans, E. pottii, B. pterotum, A. japonicum, U. bensasi, and A. lineatus were 2–24, 1–11, 1–51, and 11 only in July, and 3–6 and 1–40 thereafter. The stations of O. elegans, E. pottii, and A. lineatus were recorded at 24, 11, and 40 in June, respectively, making June the month with the highest number of records. In the other sampling months, E. pottii was only recorded at 1–2 sampling stations. Omobranchus elegans and A. lineatus were recorded at the second highest number of sampling stations in July, being present at 15 and 29 stations, respectively. Apogonichthys japonicum was recorded at 11 sampling stations in July, and U. bensasi was recorded at 3–6 sampling stations from April to July. Benthosema pterotum was recorded at the highest number of sampling stations (51) in July, followed by 32 sampling stations in June, with the lowest number of records (1 and 3 sampling stations) from April to May (Table 1).
In terms of larval number, only 52 A. japonicum individuals were collected in July during the oblique haul. For B. pterotum, 1 and 3 individuals were collected from April to May. However, 5303 and 8527 individuals were collected in the horizontal and oblique hauls in July, respectively. The number of B. pterotum larvae collected by oblique hauls in June and July was higher than the number collected in horizontal hauls. The number of U. bensasi larvae was recorded as 3–34 and 2–29 individuals (ind), respectively, in horizontal and oblique hauls. The abundance of E. pottii larvae was highest in June, and very few individuals were collected in the other months. The abundance of O. elegans larvae in the horizontal hauls was higher than the number in oblique hauls, particularly in May (120 versus 7 individuals) and July (101 versus 10 individuals). A low abundance (1–3 individuals) of A. lineatus was recorded in samples from April to May, with highest abundance (174–364 individuals) recorded from June to July (Table 1).
The larvae of O. elegans collected in horizontal hauls were predominantly in the preflexion stage from May (114 individuals) to June (42 individuals), while the postflexion stage was dominant in July (63 individuals). The larvae of E. pottii were predominantly in the preflexion stage in June. The majority of B. pterotum larvae were in the flexion stage in June and postflexion and juvenile stages in July. Acropoma japonicum larvae were recorded from the yolk-sac to the postflexion stage, with the preflexion stage being dominant in July. The larvae of U. bensasi ranged from the preflexion to juvenile stages from April to June, and the majority were at the juvenile stage in July. The larvae of A. lineatus, collected in horizontal hauls in June, were mainly in the flexion stage (245 individuals), while those collected in oblique hauls were in the preflexion to postflexion stages (Table 1).
Larval density intervals at sampling stations were 0–1, 1–10, 10–50, 50–100, 100–500, and >500 ind/100 m3 (Figure 2). At the majority of stations, O. elegans (1−16 stations) and E. pottii (1–7 stations) were recorded 0–1 ind/100 m3 and were present in the surface samples in April to July. Most stations where B. pterotum were recorded were in the intervals of 0–1, 1–10, and 10–50 ind/100 m3 from June to July. Acropoma japonicum larvae were found in the bottom in July 2018, ranging from 0–1 to 10–50 ind/100 m3. Only 1–3 stations where U. bensasi were recorded were in the interval of 1–10 ind/100 m3. For A. lineatus, 0–1 ind/100 m3 were recorded at 1–2 stations in April to May and 1–10 ind/100 m3 at 8–19 stations in June to July.

3.2. Spatiotemporal Abundance Distributions

The spatial distribution range of O. elegans in June mainly included the coastal area of the Zhejiang coastline and outside the Yangtze Estuary, at latitudes ranging from 26.00° N to 32.00° N. At 122.00° N 29.00° E in July, the total number of larvae reached 76 individuals in preflexion to postflexion stages, ranging from 27.50° to 31.25° N (Figure 3).
In June, Erisphex pottii was mainly distributed in the area of outside the Yangtze Estuary with the range of 31.00° to 31.50° N. Upeneus bensasi was distributed in the coastal area of Fujian province, China with the range of 24.26–26.00° N in June. Benthosema pterotum and A. lineatus were mainly distributed in the water area (between the Yangtze River estuary and the Zhoushan fishing ground) at the confluence of the Kuroshio branch current and the Changjiang diluted water in June and July, migrating from 30.00–31.00° N 123.17–123.50° E in June to 30.00–32.50° N 122.22–123.50° E in July (Figure 1 and Figure 3 and Table 2). Compared with the distribution range of B. pterotum, the spatial distribution of A. lineatus was closer to the Yangtze River estuary in July (Figure 3). The habitat–area range of these two species roughly overlapped.

3.3. Variations in Measured Environmental Variables

The six species were distributed from shallow waters (5.00 m deep) to deeper waters (66.00 m deep). The sea surface temperature (SST) range of the six species was 4.40–29.60 °C. Omobranchus elegans had the widest temperature range, from 4.40–28.73 °C. The lower SST limit of E. pottii, U. bensasi, and A. lineatus were similar (18.69 to 18.89 °C), and the upper range limits for these species were 25.20, 28.07, and 29.60 °C, respectively. The highest SST values for B. pterotum and A. japonicum were 29.60 °C, but the lower SST limit of B. pterotum was far lower than that of A. japonicum (16.26 versus 24.11 °C). The lower limits of sea bottom temperature for E. pottii, A. japonicum, U. bensasi and A. lineatus were ~18.00–19.00 °C. The highest upper limit was 30.03 °C for A lineatus, followed by 27.44 °C for A. japonicum, and the lowest values were 20.69 °C and 22.62 °C for E. pottii and U. bensasi respectively. The sea bottom temperature range for O. elegans and B. pterotum was 13.97–28.74 °C.
The sea surface salinity (SSS) range for these six species was 16.54–34.60 psu. The SSS range of O. elegans, B. pterotum, A. lineatus, E. pottii, and A. japonicum were very similar (16.54–34.60 psu versus 25.89–34.60 psu). The species with the narrowest SSS range was U. bensasi (29.30–34.50 psu). The sea bottom salinity ranges were 20.34–33.80 psu for O. elegans (the highest), 24.95–34.59 psu for B. pterotum and A. japonicum, 27.85–34.57 psu for A. lineatus (the second highest), and 31.19–34.59 psu for E. pottii and U. bensasi (the lowest). The pH value range of these six species was 7.00 to 9.00. The DO range of O. elegans was the widest (2.54–8.70 mg/L). The lower DO limit of other four species (B. pterotum, A. japonicum, U. bensasi, A. lineatus) was ~5.00 (4.80–5.05) mg/L, and the upper DO limit range of A. japonicum (5.89 mg/L), U. bensasi (6.21 mg/L), A. lineatus (7.58 mg/L), and B. pterotum (8.50 mg/L) ranged from 5.89 to 8.50 mg/L (Table 3).

4. Discussion

Benthosema pterotum larvae were recorded almost all year round in the East China Sea, with the highest abundance from July to August [17]. In the Indian Ocean, Benthosema pterotum spawning takes place throughout the year with peaks from March to June and September to November, which corresponds to the transition period between monsoon seasons [37]. In the Oman Sea, the breeding season is from May to September [18]. In the current study, B. pterotum larvae were most abundant in July. This indicated that the spawning period in the East China Sea is much shorter than that in the Indian Ocean.
In terms of habitat, adult B. pterotum are reported to be distributed in the area of north of 30.00° N [38]. They migrate a short distance in the northern East China Sea, from the southwest in winter to the northeast in spring, and then from the northeast in summer to the southwest in autumn. The population distribution in spring and summer is a little more east than that in autumn and winter [38]. Li et al. (2006) suggested that adults are mainly distributed in 30.50–32.50° N 124.00–126.50° E [38]. In the current study, Benthosema pterotum larvae migrated from 30.00–31.00° N 123.17–123.50° E in June to 30.00–32.50° N 122.22–123.50° E in July. Sassa et al. (2015) also observed that the high abundance of the larvae occurred in the area of 30.00–30.50° N 124.50–126.00° E [39]. That is to say, the spawning grounds might be in the intersecting waters between the Changjiang diluted water and Kuroshio branch current. The shelf-break salinity front might act as a barrier restricting the offshore dispersion of the larvae, enabling them to recruit into the area of adult habitat. In addition, cold water in Northern Taiwan resulting from the impingement of the Kuroshio Current onto the continental shelf causes upwelling, creating good spawning and nursery grounds for B. pterotum [40].
The current study also identified the larvae of B. pterotum migrating to the nearshore. The density of the adult population was reported to be higher in the nearshore waters than offshore areas [38], suggesting that larger individuals of this species preferred to inhabit coastal waters. Some juveniles moved to the south of the Changjiang River estuary. We suggest that the reason they migrate to the inshore area is due to high productivity and low transparency. High concentrations of B. pterotum were observed in the highly productive areas [41]. It has been reported that increases in primary production occur with greater river discharge from nearshore waters to offshore waters in the East China Sea [42]. Regarding the low transparency, highly turbid waters in the bottom layer are found at 30.00–32.00° N over the mud shelf region [43]. Suspended particulate matter discharged into the ocean along with river water produced highly turbid waters. The dim light conditions enable the mesopelagic B. pterotum to live in such a shallow area. In addition, the larvae are less likely to be preyed upon when water turbidity increases and light decreases [44].
In the current study, the larvae of B. pterotum were mainly in the flexion stage in June and the postflexion stage in July. Owing to a very short egg hatching period (12 h at 21 °C) [45], the distribution of larvae at the preflexion to flexion stages represented the approximate location of the spawning grounds. After complete formation of the caudal fin base, postflexion larvae have sufficient swimming ability. It was reported that the preflexion and flexion larvae were mainly observed in the waters of the south and central shelf region, and postflexion larvae and juveniles were abundant in the waters of the north and peripheral shelf region of the East China Sea [46]. In terms of larval abundance, the mean abundance of the larvae in this study was 0.06–5993.68 ind/100 m3, changing from 0.09–4.88 ind/100 m3 in April–May to 8.54–395.19 ind/100 m3 in June to July (8.54–8.83 ind/100 m3 in June, 20.30–395.20 ind/100 m3 in July). It was previously reported that the median abundance varied from 8.80 to 24,881.90 ind/100 m3, with the highest in June 2009 and lowest in July 2010 (656.80 against 57.80 ind/100 m3) [46].
In terms of measured hydrographic characteristics (such as DO, water temperature, and salinity) affecting the distribution of the larvae, the largest DO range in the current study was recorded for B. pterotum (4.80 to 8.50 mg/L). CCA ordination analysis showed that the larvae were most influenced by high DO concentrations [47]. High DO concentrations in the coastal waters, caused by upwelling, attracted larvae to move inshore [48]. In the Indian Ocean, spawning is expected to occur in waters of ~21.00–28.00 °C [45]. The optimal water temperature for the larvae in the current study was 18.00–20.00 °C with a range of 13.97–29.60 °C, suggesting an optimum temperature >24.00 °C for larvae [49]. Larvae in the preflexion and flexion stages inhabit optimum temperatures ranging from 28.20 to 28.80 °C at 25.00−29.00° N 121.00−125.00° E [46]. The sea surface temperature isotherm produced by the Kuroshio front might be a key oceanographic structure defining larval distribution dynamics. Sassa et al. (2014) suggested that salinity affected the distribution of the larvae [50]. In the Arabian Sea, the salinity of the larvae ranged from 35.00 to 37.00 psu [51]. On the shelf of the East China Sea, the salinity was much lower than that of the Arabian Sea with a range of 33.50–33.90 psu [52]. Sassa et al. (2014) suggested two distinct distribution patterns of larvae: the area of <33.70 psu and near the 33.70 psu isohaline [50]. Our study suggested the bottom salinity isohaline of 32.00–34.00 psu for larvae distribution.
Comparing A. lineatus with B. pterotum, both species migrated from birth places 58.00–61.00 m deep to the coastal shallow waters with depths of 26.00–51.95 m. However, the depth range of A. lineatus was lower than B. pterotum (27.51–42.06 m versus 26.00–51.95 m). Suitable SST and bottom sea temperature for these species changed from 18.40–19.20 °C to 23.89–29.60 °C and from 17.53–20.79 °C to 19.08–22.27 °C from June to July, respectively. The SSS of B. pterotum and A. lineatus changed from 30.49–34.30 psu to 17.77–22.26 psu and 21.41–27.85 psu, respectively. The sea bottom salinity of B. pterotum decreased from 30.31–34.53 to 32.22–33.80 psu from June to July, showing the distribution basically along the isolines of 32.00–34.00 psu. The range of sea bottom salinity for A. lineatus was 30.51 to 31.95 psu, which was lower than the range for B. pterotum in June, which was basically along the isolines of 30.00–32.00 psu, and 32.54 to 33.94 psu in July, along the isolines of 32.00–34.00 psu (Table 2).
To date, there have been very few studies identifying the larval distributions of O. elegans, E. pottii, A. japonicum, U. bensasi, and A. lineatus in the East China Sea. Acropoma japonicum, A. lineatus, and E. pottii are seasonally dominant species in the Zhoushan fishing ground [53]. We reported that these species are distributed from 5.00 m to 66.00 m. The temperature and salinity of O. elegans habitat were previously reported to be 12.00–30.00 °C and 27.40–32.50 psu [16], lower than those recorded in the current study (SST: 4.40–28.73 °C; SBS: 20.34–33.80 psu). The habitat temperature (SST) of the A. lineatus larvae was estimated to be 18.89–19.00 °C in June and 23.89–29.60 °C in July. Compared with B. pterotum, Apogonichthys lineatus prefers to remain in water with large variations of SSS (21.41–27.85 psu) and is closer to the offshore area (Table 2). Larval distribution corresponded closely with the adult habitat of small-sized fishes in the East China Sea.
Conclusively, the East China Sea is one of the most rapidly warming large marine ecosystems, and its SST increased by 1.22 °C between 1982 and 2006 [54]. SST showed a significant warming trend in the waters of China, and its increasing rate is far higher than the global average [55,56]. Wang et al. (2020) reported that the SST in the waters of northeastern Taiwan in winter increased between 1985 and 2015 [45]. In July and August 2017, extreme warm SST anomalies (SSTAs) were observed in the northern Yellow Sea, which lasted for 60 days with a maximum daily SST of 2.93 °C on the date of the peak. High water temperature was considered as one of the most important factors leading to the mass emaciation and mortality of scallops on Zhangzi Island [57,58]. Larval assemblies are more easily to be affected by extra climate and increasing water temperature. Thus, it is important to perform continuous large-scale ichthyoplankton surveys in the East China Sea to understand the spatiotemporal variations of eggs and larvae of important fish species in the context of increasing temperatures.

5. Summary

The descriptions on the larval distribution of the small-sized fishes Omobranchus elegans, Erisphex pottii, Benthosema pterotum, Acropoma japonicum, Upeneus bensasi, and Apogonichthys lineatus in the East China Sea ecosystem remain scant. The current study contributed to the knowledge of the spatiotemporal distributions and dynamics of the early life history of these species. Especially, we found B. pterotum and A. lineatus migrated from 30.00–31.00° N 123.17–123.50° E in June to 30.00–32.50° N 122.22–123.50° E in July. Our findings contribute to the maintenance of ocean biodiversity and promote sustainable fisheries managements.

Author Contributions

M.X., L.Y., Z.L., Y.W. and J.C. contributed to the development, planning, data collection; Y.J., X.Y., H.Z., X.S. and T.O. contributed to data analysis and interpretation. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by the Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, the East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, the Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (2019M05), the National Key Research and Development Project (2020YFD0900804), Key Laboratory of Marine Ecological Monitoring and Restoration Technologies, MNR (MEMRT202208), the Special Funds for Survey of Nearshore Spawning Ground and offshore Fishery Resources by the Ministry of Agriculture, the Rural Affairs (125C0505), and the Key R & D Projects of Hebei Province (22373302D).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the members of fishing boats for their help with field sampling especially for Chun Li, as well as members from the Key Laboratory of East China Sea and the Oceanic Fishery Resources Exploitation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, for constructive discussions and encouragement.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chang, N.N.; Shiao, J.C.; Gong, G.C. Diversity of demersal fish in the East China Sea: Implication of eutrophication and fishery. Cont. Shelf. Res. 2012, 47, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Johnson, R.H.; Toy, M.D. SST gradients and the East Asian early−summer monsoon. In The Global Monsoon System: Research and Forecast, 3rd ed.; World Scientific Publishing Co.: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhu, L.X.; Lu, H.S.; Hou, G.; Xu, W.J. Investigation on the Fishery Biology of Upeneus bensari in Beibu Gulf. J. Zhejiang Ocean Univ. 2008, 27, 123–127. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, Y.; Li, S.F.; Cheng, J.H. A study on seasonal CHANGs of the fish communities in the East China Sea and the Huanghai Sea. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 2006, 28, 108–114. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. He, Z.T.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Xue, L.J.; Jin, H.W.; Zhou, Y.D. Seasonal and ontogenetic diet composition variation of Collichthys lucidusin inshore waters in the north of East China Sea. Mar. Fish. 2012, 34, 270–276. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Lin, L.S.; Zhang, H.Y.; Li, H.Y.; Cheng, J.H. Study on Seasonal Variation of Feeding Habit of Hairtail (Trichiurus japonicus) in the East China Sea. Period. Ocean Univ. China 2006, 36, 932–936. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, Z.H.; Lu, Z.H.; Zhu, W.B. Preliminary Study on the Feeding Habits of Aluterus monoceros Adult Group in East China in Autumn. J. Zhejiang Ocean Univ. 2015, 34, 433–438. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Lin, L.S.; Zheng, Y.J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.Y. The ecological study of small−sized fish in the East China Sea Ⅰ—The species composition and seasonal variation of small−sized fish. Mar. Sci. 2006, 30, 58–63. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, Z.H.; Han, D.Y.; Gao, C.X.; Ye, S. Feeding habits of Bombay ducks (Harpadon nehereus) in the offshore waters of southern Zhejiang, based on predator CPUE weighting. J. Fish. Sci. China 2021, 28, 482–492. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, X.S.; Yu, Z.H.; Sun, S.; Jin, X.S. Ecological niche breadth and niche overlap of dominant species of fish assemblage in Yangtze River estuary and its adjacent waters. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 24, 2353–2359. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Park, J.M.; Jung, H.K.; Lee, C.I.; Huh, S.H. Day−night and gastrointestinal changes in winter feeding intensity and prey composition of Apogon lineatus inhabiting the southeastern waters of korea. Ocean Sci. J. 2018, 54, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Choo, H.G. Species Composition and Feeding Ecology of Fishes in the Coastal Waters off Kori, Korea. Ph.D. Thesis, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea, 2007; p. 126. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ye, S.Z.; Zhang, Z.L. Biology If Upeneus bensasi in shallow south Fujian and Taiwan. J. Fujian Fish. 1996, 3, 11–16. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Shen, W.; Jiang, Y.Z.; Cheng, J.H. Age and growth characters of Acropoma japonicum in the East China Sea. J. Fish. Sci. China 2009, 16, 588–595. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Jin, H.W.; Xue, L.J.; Zhu, Z.J.; Pan, G.L. Feeding habits of Apogon lineatus in the East China Sea and southern Yellow Sea. Mar. Fish. 2012, 34, 361–370. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Jiang, S.F.; Yan, W.B. Larvae of Omobranchus elegans (Steindachner) Found in Luo Yuan Bay and Jiulong River, Estuary Fujian. J. Xiamen Univ. 1989, 28, 672–676. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Jin, H.W.; Xue, L.J.; Pan, G.L.; Zhu, Z.J. Feeding habits of Benthosema pterotumin the East China Sea and southern part of Yellow Sea. Mar. Fish. 2011, 33, 368–377. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Hosseini−Shekarabi, S.P.; Valinassab, T.; Bystydzieńska, Z.; Linkowski, T. Age and growth of Benthosema pterotum (alcock, 1890) (myctophidae) in the oman sea. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2015, 31, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, Z.R. Study on status of Upeneus bensasi in southwestern continental shelf of Nansha Islands. J. Ocean Taiwan. Strait. 2006, 25, 273–278. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Valinassab, T.; Pierce, G.J.; Johannesson, K. Lantern fish (Benthosema pterotum) resources as a target for commercial exploitation in the Oman Sea. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2007, 23, 573–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Masuda, H.; Amaoka, K.; Araga, C.; Uyeno, T.; Yoshino, T. The Fishes of the Japanese Archipelago; Tokai University Press: Tokyo, Japan, 1984; Volume 1, p. 437. [Google Scholar]
  22. Su, J.; Yuan, Y.; Jiang, J. Advances in physical oceanography in China since the establishment of the PRC. Acta Geophys. 1994, 37, 85–95. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Tang, Q.S.; Sherman, K. The large marine ecosystems of the Pacific Rim: Assessment, sustainability, and management. In A Report of a Symposium Held in Qingdao, People’s Republic of China; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  24. Okazaki, Y.; Nakata, H. Effect of the mesoscale hydrographic features on larval fish distribution across the shelf break of East China Sea. Cont. Shelf. Res. 2007, 27, 1616–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chang, Y.J.; Sun, C.L.; Chen, Y.; Yeh, S.Z.; Dinardo, G. Habitat suitability analysis and identification of potential fishing grounds for swordfish, Xiphias gladius, in the South Atlantic Ocean. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2012, 33, 7523–7541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xue, Y.; Guan, L.S.; Tanaka, K.; Chen, Y.; Ren, Y. Evaluating effects of rescaling and weighting data on habitat suitability modeling. Fish. Res. 2017, 188, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tanaka, K.; Chen, Y. Spatiotemporal variability of suitable habitat for American lobster (Homarus americanus) in Long Island Sound. J. Shellfish Res. 2015, 34, 531–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Blumberg, A.F. A primer for ECOM-si. Tech. Rep. HydroQual 1994, 66. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wu, H.; Zhu, J. Advection scheme with 3rd high-order spatial interpolation at the middle temporal level and its application to saltwater intrusion in the Changjiang Estuary. Ocean Model. 2010, 33, 33–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, H.; Zhu, J.; Shen, J.; Wang, H. Tidal modulation on the Changjiang River plume in summer. J. Geophys. Res. 2011, 116, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, M.; Liang, X.S.; Wu, H.; Wang, Y. Different generating mechanisms for the summer surface cold patches in the Yellow Sea. Atmosphere-Ocean 2018, 56, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, T.; Wu, H. Tidal mixing sustains a bottom−trapped river plume and buoyant coastal current on an energetic continental shelf. J. Geophys. Res. 2018, 123, 8026–8051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, H.; Shen, J.; Zhu, J.; Li, L. Characteristics of the Changjiang plume and its extension along the Jiangsu Coast. Cont. Shelf. Res. 2014, 76, 108–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, H.; Gu, J.; Zhu, P. Winter counter−wind transport in the inner southwestern Yellow Sea. J. Geophysical Res. 2018, 123, 411–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yuan, R.; Wu, H.; Zhu, J.; Li, L. The response time of the Changjiang plume to river discharge in summer. J. Mar. Syst. 2016, 154, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, W.; Wu, H.; Zhu, Z. Transient Hypoxia Extent Off Changjiang River Estuary due to Mobile Changjiang River Plume. J. Geophys. Res. 2018, 123, 9196–9211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dalpadado, P. Reproductive biology of the lanternfish Benthosema pterotum from the indian ocean. Mar. Biol. 1988, 98, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, J.S.; Hu, F.; Li, S.F.; Cheng, J.H. Quantity distribution of Benthosema pterotum and in relationship with surface layer water temperature and salinity in the East China Sea region. Mar. Fish. 2006, 28, 105–110. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  39. Sassa, C.; Takahashi, M.; Tsukamoto, Y. Distribution, hatch−date, growth, and mortality of larval Benthosema pterotum (pisces: Myctophidae) in the shelf region of the east china sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 2015, 95, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tang, T.Y.; Tai, J.H.; Yang, Y.J. The flow pattern north of Taiwan and the migration of the Kuroshio. Cont. Shelf. Res. 2000, 20, 349–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gjosaeter, J.; Kawaguchi, K. A review of the world resources of mesopelagic fish. FAO Fish. Technol. Pap. 1980, 193, 133. [Google Scholar]
  42. Gong, G.C.; Chena, J.; Chiang, K.P.; Hsiung, T.M.; Hung, C.C.; Duan, S.W.; Codispoti, L.A. Reduction of primary production and changing of nutrient ratio in the East China sea: Effect of the three Gorges dam? Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Longhurst, A. Ecological Geography of the Sea, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  44. Fiksen, Ø.; Aksnes, D.L.; Flyum, M.H.; Giske, J. The influence of turbidity on growth and survival of fish larvae: A numerical analysis. In: Sustainable Increase of Marine Harvesting: Fundamental Mechanisms and New Concepts. Hydrobiologia 2002, 484, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gjster, J.; Tilseth, S. Spawning behaviour, egg and larval development of the myctophid fish Benthosema pterotum. Mar. Biol. 1988, 98, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, Y.C.; Lee, M.A. Ontogenetic habitat differences in Benthosema pterotum during summer in the shelf region of the southern east china sea. Deep−Sea Res. Part II 2020, 175, 104739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rui, Y.; Jiang, R.J.; Wang, H.X.; Luan, H.N.; Yin, R.; Zhu, Y.D.; Zhang, L.L. Characteristics of fish community structure and its relationship with environmental factors in Dachenyang spawning ground reserve. J. Fish. China 2022, 46, 995–1007. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  48. Tseng, C.T.; Lin, C.; Chen, S.; Shyu, C. Temporal and spatial variations of sea surface temperature in the East China Sea. Cont. Shelf. Res. 2000, 20, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sassa, C.; Tsukamoto, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Tokimura, M. Spatio−temporal distribution and biomass of Benthosema pterotum (pisces: Myctophidae) in the shelf region of the east china sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. 2010, 407, 227–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Sassa, C.; Ohshimo, S.; Tanaka, H.; Tsukamoto, Y. Reproductive biology of Benthosema pterotum (teleostei: Myctophidae) in the shelf region of the east china sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 2014, 94, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ropke, A. Do larvae of mesopelagic fishes in the Arabian Sea adjust their vertical distribution to physical and biological gradients? Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1993, 101, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Moser, G.H.; Smith, P.E. Larvae fish assemblages of the California Current region and their horizontal and vertical distributions across a front. Bull. Mar. Sci. 1993, 53, 645–691. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang, Y.B.; Yu, C.G.; Chen, Q.Z.; Chen, X.Q.; Zheng, J. Community structure of fish in Zhoushan Fishing Ground and its adjacent waters in spring and summer. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2012, 23, 545–551. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  54. Belkin, I.M. Rapid warming of large marine ecosystem. Prog. Oceanogr. 2009, 81, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wu, L.; Cai, W.; Zhang, L.; Nakamura, H.; Timmermann, A.; Joyce, T.; McPhaden, M.J. Enhanced warming over the global subtropical western boundary currents. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2012, 2, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, A.; Wang, H.; Fan, W.; Luo, J.; Li, W.; Xu, S. Study on characteristics of marine heatwave in the China offshore in 2019. HaiyangXuebao 2021, 43, 35–44. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang, Q.; Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y. Temporal and spatial characteristics of marine heat waves in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea during 1982–2019. HaiyangXuebao 2021, 43, 38–49. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  58. Li, Y.; Ren, G.; Wang, Q.; You, Q. More extreme marine heatwaves in the China Seas during the global warming hiatus. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 104010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sustainability 14 14826 g001 550
Figure 1. Map showing the geographic areas (24.26–33.00° N 118.55–123.50° E) in the East China Sea Region between the coastline of Jiangsu, Shanghai, Zhejiang, and Fujian provinces inside the area closed for marine trawl fisheries. The survey stations are denoted by solid blue squares. The gray gradient denotes the depth range (0–100 m). The blue arrow ① indicates Changjiang diluted water, ② indicates the Taiwan Warm Current, and ③ indicates the Kuroshio Current.
Figure 1. Map showing the geographic areas (24.26–33.00° N 118.55–123.50° E) in the East China Sea Region between the coastline of Jiangsu, Shanghai, Zhejiang, and Fujian provinces inside the area closed for marine trawl fisheries. The survey stations are denoted by solid blue squares. The gray gradient denotes the depth range (0–100 m). The blue arrow ① indicates Changjiang diluted water, ② indicates the Taiwan Warm Current, and ③ indicates the Kuroshio Current.
Sustainability 14 14826 g001
Sustainability 14 14826 g002 550
Figure 2. The station percentage of larval density interval (0–1, 1–10, 10–50, 50–100, 100–500, and >500 ind/100 m3) of Omobranchus elegans, Erisphex pottii, Benthosema pterotum, Acropoma japonicum, Upeneus bensasi, and Apogonichthys lineatus in horizontal and oblique hauls from April to July, 2018. “S” denotes the horizontal haul and “B” denotes the oblique haul.
Figure 2. The station percentage of larval density interval (0–1, 1–10, 10–50, 50–100, 100–500, and >500 ind/100 m3) of Omobranchus elegans, Erisphex pottii, Benthosema pterotum, Acropoma japonicum, Upeneus bensasi, and Apogonichthys lineatus in horizontal and oblique hauls from April to July, 2018. “S” denotes the horizontal haul and “B” denotes the oblique haul.
Sustainability 14 14826 g002
Sustainability 14 14826 g003 550
Figure 3. The larval distributions of each developmental stage collected in the study area in the surface (a–h) and bottom (i–p) trawls. (a,i) Omobranchus elegans in June; (b,j) Benthosema pterotum in June; (c,k) Erisphex pottii in June; (d,l) Apogonichthys lineatus in June; (e,m) Omobranchus elegans in July; (f,n) Benthosema pterotum in July; (g,o) Upeneus bensasi in June; and (h,p) Apogonichthys lineatus in July.
Figure 3. The larval distributions of each developmental stage collected in the study area in the surface (a–h) and bottom (i–p) trawls. (a,i) Omobranchus elegans in June; (b,j) Benthosema pterotum in June; (c,k) Erisphex pottii in June; (d,l) Apogonichthys lineatus in June; (e,m) Omobranchus elegans in July; (f,n) Benthosema pterotum in July; (g,o) Upeneus bensasi in June; and (h,p) Apogonichthys lineatus in July.
Sustainability 14 14826 g003
Table
Table 1. Positive station number (sn), total larvae number (tn), mean larval density (mld, inds/100 m3), and the number in each developmental stage (yolk-sac: yolk; preflexion: pre; flexion: flex; postflexion: post; juvenile: j) of Omobranchus elegans, Erisphex pottii, Benthosema pterotum, Acropoma japonicum, Upeneus bensasi, and Apogonichthys lineatus in horizontal and oblique hauls conducted from April to July 2018.
Table 1. Positive station number (sn), total larvae number (tn), mean larval density (mld, inds/100 m3), and the number in each developmental stage (yolk-sac: yolk; preflexion: pre; flexion: flex; postflexion: post; juvenile: j) of Omobranchus elegans, Erisphex pottii, Benthosema pterotum, Acropoma japonicum, Upeneus bensasi, and Apogonichthys lineatus in horizontal and oblique hauls conducted from April to July 2018.
Horizontal HaulOblique Haul
The SpeciesMonthsntnmldYolkPreFlexPostjtnmldYolkPreFlexPostj
Omobranchus elegansApril210.11---1-10.11---1-
May81202.39-11451-71.32-7---
June24490.32-4261-450.81-30141-
July151010.89-102863-101.261315-
Erisphex pottiiApril1-------11.89-1---
May110.12-1----------
June11200.894124--72.61-43--
July210.03----110.19----1
Benthosema pterotumApril1-------10.10----1
May310.09---1-32.95-111-
June328208.54243570205-19738.83-29116875620
July51530320.301327658147631298527395.20-10114750682302
Acropoma japonicumApril---------------
May---------------
June---------------
July11-------526.878181313-
Upeneus bensasiApril660.25-231-290.84-4187-
May330.17---1220.11--1-1
June5110.51-452-150.76-31011
July3341.17--1-33-------
Apogonichthys lineatusApril230.15---3--------
May110.10---1--------
June403643.4056724547-2622.40-9386821
July291741.734146987-34412.173297919232
Table
Table 2. Suitable measured habitat variable range calculated with the HSI of Benthosema pterotum and Apogonichthys lineatus from June to July 2018. D—depth (m), SST—sea surface temperature (°C), SBT—sea bottom temperature (°C), SSS—sea surface salinity (psu), SBS—sea bottom salinity (psu), and MSAR—most suitable area range.
Table 2. Suitable measured habitat variable range calculated with the HSI of Benthosema pterotum and Apogonichthys lineatus from June to July 2018. D—depth (m), SST—sea surface temperature (°C), SBT—sea bottom temperature (°C), SSS—sea surface salinity (psu), SBS—sea bottom salinity (psu), and MSAR—most suitable area range.
DSSTSBTSSSSBSMSHR
Benthosema pterotumJune59.00–61.0018.40–19.2018.62–20.7932.37–34.3030.31–34.5330.00–31.00° N, 123.17–123.50° E
July26.00–51.9523.89–26.0219.71–22.2717.77–22.2632.22–33.8030.00–32.50° N, 122.22–123.50° E
Apogonichthys lineatusJune57.85–59.0018.89–19.0017.53–19.3530.49–33.2830.51–31.9530.50–31.00° N, 123.17–123.33° E
July27.51–42.0623.89–29.6019.08–21.8221.41–27.8532.54–33.9431.25–32.00° N, 122.50–123.50° E
Table
Table 3. The range of measured environmental variables are presented for the species including Omobranchus elegans, Erisphex pottii, Benthosema pterotum, Acropoma japonicum, Upeneus bensasi, and Apogonichthys lineatus from April to July 2018 in the study area. Abbreviation: SST—sea surface temperature, SBT—sea bottom temperature, SSS—sea surface salinity, SBS—sea bottom salinity, and DO—dissolved oxygen.
Table 3. The range of measured environmental variables are presented for the species including Omobranchus elegans, Erisphex pottii, Benthosema pterotum, Acropoma japonicum, Upeneus bensasi, and Apogonichthys lineatus from April to July 2018 in the study area. Abbreviation: SST—sea surface temperature, SBT—sea bottom temperature, SSS—sea surface salinity, SBS—sea bottom salinity, and DO—dissolved oxygen.
SpeciesDepth (m)SST (°C)SBT (°C)SSS (psu)SBS (psu)pHDO (mg/L)
Omobranchus elegans5.00–61.304.40–28.7315.07–28.7416.54–34.6020.34–33.806.98–8.982.54–8.70
Erisphex pottii15.00–60.0018.89–25.2018.37–20.6926.54–34.6031.73–34.59--
Benthosema pterotum8.10–61.0016.26–29.6013.97–27.4417.53–34.3024.95–34.597.10–9.054.80–8.50
Acropoma japonicum32.00–61.0024.11–29.6018.72–27.4425.89–33.6524.95–34.557.15–8.654.91–5.89
Upeneus bensasi13.00–66.0018.69–28.0718.89–22.6229.30–34.5031.19–34.577.16–8.895.05–6.21
Apogonichthys lineatus8.10–59.0018.89–29.6017.53–30.0317.53–33.7227.85–34.577.08–9.054.80–7.58
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, M.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Jin, Y.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, H.; Song, X.; Otaki, T.; Yang, L.; Cheng, J. Larval Spatiotemporal Distribution of Six Fish Species: Implications for Sustainable Fisheries Management in the East China Sea. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214826

AMA Style

Xu M, Liu Z, Wang Y, Jin Y, Yuan X, Zhang H, Song X, Otaki T, Yang L, Cheng J. Larval Spatiotemporal Distribution of Six Fish Species: Implications for Sustainable Fisheries Management in the East China Sea. Sustainability. 2022; 14(22):14826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214826

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Min, Zunlei Liu, Yihe Wang, Yan Jin, Xinwei Yuan, Hui Zhang, Xiaojing Song, Takayoshi Otaki, Linlin Yang, and Jiahua Cheng. 2022. "Larval Spatiotemporal Distribution of Six Fish Species: Implications for Sustainable Fisheries Management in the East China Sea" Sustainability 14, no. 22: 14826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214826

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop