Next Article in Journal
Is Silence Golden? The Influence of Employee Silence on the Transactional Leadership and Job Satisfaction Relationship
Next Article in Special Issue
A Reliable and Cost-Efficient PCR-RFLP Tool for the Rapid Identification of Cetaceans in the Mediterranean Sea
Previous Article in Journal
Improvement of Negative Emotion Recognition in Visible Images Enhanced by Thermal Imaging
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comprehensive Review regarding the Profile of the Microplastic Pollution in the Coastal Area of the Black Sea
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 14
Issue 22
10.3390/su142215202
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isotopic Niche and Trophic Position of the Invasive Portunid Portunus segnis Forskål, (1775) in Elounda Bay (Crete Island, Eastern Mediterranean)

by
Giorgio Mancinelli
1,2,3,*,
Thanos Dailianis
4,
Costas Dounas
4,
Panagiotis Kasapidis
4,
Panayota Koulouri
4,
Grigorios Skouradakis
4,
Roberta Bardelli
5,
Cristina Di Muri
6,7,
Maria Teresa Guerra
1 and
Salvatrice Vizzini
2,5
1
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies—DiSTeBA, University of Salento, SP Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
2
Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Scienze del Mare—CoNISMa, Piazzale Flaminio 9, 00196 Rome, Italy
3
Italian National Research Council, Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnologies—CNR-IRBIM, Via Pola 4, 71010 Foggia, Italy
4
Hellenic Centre for Marine Research—HCMR, Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture—IMBBC, 71500 Heraklion, Greece
5
Department of Earth and Marine Sciences—DiSTeM, University of Palermo, Via Archirafi 22, 90133 Palermo, Italy
6
Italian National Research Council, Institute of Research on Terrestrial Ecosystems—CNR-IRET, University of Salento, SP Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
7
LifeWatch ERIC, Service Centre, Campus Ecotekne, SP Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(22), 15202; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215202
Submission received: 11 October 2022 / Revised: 4 November 2022 / Accepted: 12 November 2022 / Published: 16 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Life below Water: Marine Biology and Sustainable Ocean)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
There is a growing recognition that an advanced understanding of the trophic characteristics of an invasive consumer can provide important information on its ecological impact. In recent years, the blue swimming crab Portunus segnis, one of the earliest Lessepsian invaders, has considerably expanded its distribution range in the Mediterranean Sea, yet, its trophic habits in invaded areas remain scarcely investigated. In this study, we used carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes analysis (SIA) to determine the trophic position and isotopic niche of the crab compared with other representatives of the flora and fauna occurring in Elounda Bay (Crete). P. segnis showed a trophic position of 3.9, higher than the values determined by SIA or conventional gut content analysis in other areas of the Mediterranean Sea or in the native range. Crab specimens showed a high inter-individual variability in both δ13C and δ15N values; further analysis indicated negligible differences in the isotopic niche of adult males and females. Conversely, δ15N values were significantly related to the size of the specimens, ultimately suggesting an ontogenetic dietary shift. This study represents the first attempt to characterize the trophic habits of the blue swimming crab in the context of an invaded food web and may contribute to the implementation of long-term management strategies of control and mitigation of its ecological impact.

1. Introduction

The Mediterranean Sea is recognized worldwide as a biodiversity hotspot as well as one of the marine regions most affected by biological invasions [1,2,3]. A number of anthropogenic factors including shipping, aquaculture trade, and artificial corridors interact and intensify the introduction of non-indigenous species (NIS hereafter) in the basin, enforcing the necessity of quantitatively assessing the impact of NIS to prioritize appropriate measures of control, management, and mitigation [4,5].
Noticeably, so far the impacts of bioinvaders have been primarily evaluated by relying on the qualitative evidence-based knowledge of experts, rather than on quantitative evidence itself [6,7]. In addition, when quantitative evidence is available, its generality is largely limited due to the spatial and temporal context-dependency of the observed effects [8,9,10]. Indeed, NIS effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functions necessarily imply alterations in the structure of invaded food webs, a “rewiring” of trophic interactions directly through predation or indirectly by competition [11,12,13,14]. This ultimately entails that an advanced assessment of an invader’s ecological impact should include the determination of its position and trophic characteristics in the context of the recipient food web [15,16,17,18]. This is particularly true for introduced marine crustaceans, since they can exert strong top-down controls, indirectly affecting non-prey species through, for example, cascading effects [19,20,21].
In this study, we focused on the portunid blue swimming crab Portunus segnis (Forskål, 1775). The species is one of the earliest Lessepsian crustacean invaders [22] recorded in Egyptian and Palestinian waters 30 years after the completion of the Suez Canal [23]. In the following years, it has successfully colonized the Levantine basin from Egypt to Turkey [24]; the Aegean Sea; eastern Sicily and the northern Tyrrhenian Sea [25]; and more recently, Tunisian, Maltese, Libyan, and Cypriot coastal waters [26,27,28,29]. Figure 1 and Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials provide an updated review of the crab’s occurrence in invaded Mediterranean areas.
In EU-Mediterranean countries besides Italy, Cyprus, and Malta, P. segnis has been reported only in Greek waters in the islands of Rhodes and Crete (Figure 1). In Crete in particular, the species was recorded only in Elounda Bay in 2018 [30]; currently, the population is established and raising interest as a shellfish product [see interview with one of the authors (C.D.) at https://imbbc.hcmr.gr/2021/01/26/eksafanisthkan-ta-mple-kabouria accessed on 14 November 2022]. Indeed, in the Persian Gulf and other native habitats, P. segnis is an important fishery resource [31,32], while in the Mediterranean Sea it has become of economic value in Egypt, Turkey and, more recently, in Tunisia [24,33,34]. Furthermore, the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM) has recently presented the Recommendation GFCM/42/2018/7 to establish a regional research program to fill scientific and research gaps for a sustainable exploitation of P. segnis and of the Atlantic blue crab Callinectes sapidus. A number of studies have focused on the occurrence (see references in Table S1), morphometry, population structure, proximate composition, and biochemistry of P. segnis [25,35,36,37,38]. To date, however, information on the trophic habits of the species and its functional role in invaded food webs are still scant, and exclusively from Tunisian coastal waters [33,39].
The first aim of the present study was to provide an assessment of the trophic position and intra-specific variation in the trophic habits of P. segnis from Elounda Bay. This bay represents an important nursery area for a diverse assemblage of fish and cephalopods in the spring and early summer months [40,41]; thus, a thorough assessment of the trophic role of P. segnis may make available important information for the conservation and protection of local marine biological resources. In recent years, the analysis of carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes (SIA) has provided a remarkable contribution to the investigation of the impacts of invasive species via an elucidation of their role in recipient food webs [42,43]. Here, SIA was used to assess the trophic position of the crab in late spring and early summer, as compared with other native and non-indigenous fish and invertebrates occurring in the bay; in addition, individual-scale isotopic information was used to investigate the isotopic niche of the crab, and to test for sex- or ontogenetic-related variations in the trophic habits of individuals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

Elounda Bay is a shallow, semi-enclosed embayment located along the north-eastern coast of the Island of Crete (35.279201° N, 25.730313° E; Figure 1). It has a total surface area of approximately 6.5 km2 and a depth ranging between 2 and 9 m, and it is connected to the outer Mirabello Bay through two natural inlets and one artificial inlet located in the northern and southern area of the basin, respectively.
The abiotic parameters characterizing the water column of the bay are described in detail in [44]. In brief, water temperatures show a strong seasonality, ranging between 14 °C in winter to 29 °C in summer; salinity variations are less pronounced, fluctuating between 39 and 42 PSU in winter and summer, respectively. Nutrients and organic matter concentrations indicate oligotrophic to mesotrophic conditions, indirectly suggesting that anthropogenic impacts are mainly related to the intense touristic activities concentrated in the summer months [45]. Most of the coastline of the embayment is rocky, while its bottoms below 2 m depth are covered by fine siltous sediment that is colonized by monospecific meadows of Caulerpa prolifera during the summer months; in addition, the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa occurs in the shallowest areas in the southern sector of the basin [41,46]. Macrophytal beds are associated with a diverse and abundant macrofaunal assemblage of benthic crustaceans, mollusks, and polychaetes, supporting a variety of fish and cephalopods including species of commercial interest such as the bogue Boops boops, the pickerel Spicara smaris, the red mullet Mullus barbatus, and the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis [40,46]. Portunus segnis was first recorded in Elounda Bay between September and October 2018 by visual observations made by local fishermen; its occurrence was further confirmed in June 2019, see also Table S1 [30]. Currently, the species is established and has reached a relatively high abundance, to the point that it is considered by the local community of fishermen to be of potential economic interest [see interview to one of the authors (C.D.) at https://imbbc.hcmr.gr/2021/01/26/eksafanisthkan-ta-mple-kabouria accessed on 14 November 2022].

2.2. Sample Collection and Laboratory Procedures

Sample collection occurred in the southern sector of the bay and in two consecutive days, 25 May and 26 May 2021 (Figure 2). At each sampling occasion, five crab traps were deployed at five different locations at depths ranging between 2 and 5 m (25 May) and between 3 and 4 m (26 May), and a total of ten different sampling sites were covered over the two sampling dates (Figure 2). The crab traps baited with fish carcasses had a cylindrical shape with a length of 60 cm and a diameter of 30 cm. The structure was made of steel spring wire covered by a 1 cm mesh net, enabling the trap to be folded for transport and ensuring an adequate stiffness when unfolded into a working position. Traps had at their ends two 12 cm wide funnel-shaped entrances made of netting, and a net pocket located in a central position for the bait. Traps were collected by SCUBA divers after 24 h from deployment. At each sampling occasion, potential bivalve prey was hand-collected by snorkeling. Additionally, specimens of the bivalve Pinctada radiata were collected in an embayment in the eastern area of the bay, where this species was present in high abundance at that time (Figure 1; Skouradakis, personal observation). Two weeks after the traps’ deployment, additional P. segnis adults were collected from fishermen operating gillnets in the central sector of the bay.
All collected specimens were transferred to the laboratory in refrigerated containers (4 °C), where they were identified to the lowest taxonomic level, enumerated, and had their individual carapace width (for brachyurans), shell length (for molluscs), and total standard length (for fish) measured to the nearest mm. Subsequently, P. segnis individuals were sexed by inspecting the shape of the abdomen apron and dissected to assess their gonadal development and maturity stage, according to the criteria reported in [47,48].

2.3. Stable Isotope Analysis (SIA)

For stable isotope analysis, claw muscles were removed with a scalpel from the brachyurans and individually dried (60 °C, >1 week). For mollusks, the foot was removed and dried, while for fish specimens a portion of the dorsal muscle was dissected. After drying, all collected samples were pulverized using a mortar and pestle. For each specimen, subsamples (0.82 ± 0.03 mg, mean ± SD) of powdered tissue were pressed into Ultra-Pure tin capsules (Costech Analytical Technologies, Valencia, CA, USA) and analyzed using an Elemental Analyzer connected with an Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific Flash EA 1112 and Delta Plus XP, respectively, Waltham, MA, USA). Isotopic notations for carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) were expressed in relation to international standards using the conventional δ unit notation as parts per mil deviations from international standards:
δ 13 C   or   δ 15 N   = R s a m p l e / R s t a n d a r d − 1 × 1000
where R = 13C/12C or 15N/14N. Pee Dee belemnite (PDB) limestone carbonate and atmospheric nitrogen (N2) were used as standards for carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios. Analytical precision based on the standard deviation of replicates of internal secondary isotopic standards (International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA-NO-3 for δ15N and IAEA-CH-6 for δ13C) was 0.2‰ for both δ15N and δ13C.

2.4. Data Analysis

Values in the text are expressed as mean ± 1SD. For parametric statistical analysis (i.e., t-test with separate variance estimates, Pearson correlation), data were preliminarily tested for their conformity to assumptions of variance homogeneity (Cochran’s C test) and normality (Shapiro-Wilks test), and were transformed when required.
In general, fish taxa showed C:N ratios < 3.5, whereas invertebrates were characterized by variable C:N ratios, in most cases > 3.5 (see Table A1 in Appendix B), which testified to a considerable contribution of lipids in the tissues carbon pool [49]. Lipids are depleted in 13C compared to proteins and carbohydrates and can significantly bias δ13C estimations [50]. Accordingly, for samples with a C:N ratio > 3.5, δ13C, values were corrected for lipid content using tissue C:N ratios following the algorithm proposed in [49], and lipid-corrected δ13C values were used in further analyses.
One-way Permutational Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA hereafter) [51] was run on an Euclidean distance matrix calculated on individual CN isotopic signatures with 9999 permutations of residuals within a reduced model to test for dissimilarities in δ13C and δ15N values among taxa, and to test for sex-related differences in isotopic values in P. segnis.
The trophic position of the crab and, for comparative purposes, of other invertebrate and fish taxa sampled during the study were estimated implementing a one-baseline, two-discrimination factor Bayesian model run with two parallel chains and 40,000 adaptive iterations. The choices of appropriate baseline species and Trophic Enrichment Factors (TEF hereafter) were key steps in ensuring robust trophic position estimations [52]. Suspension feeding bivalves have long been recognized as reliable baseline references in studies of freshwater [53,54] and, more recently, marine food webs [55,56], since they have a relatively long biological cycle, a low metabolic rate, and are able to integrate highly variable isotope values among primary producers [53,57]. Here we used the cumulated δ13C and δ15N values of the two suspensivore bivalves Modiolus barbatus and Pinctada radiata as baseline, assuming a trophic level λ = 2 after a PERMANOVA indicated negligible inter-specific differences (see Results). Regarding the choice of an appropriate TEF, species- or taxon-specific values were generally suggested [52]. Here we adopted TEFs for carbon and nitrogen of Δ13C = 0.27 ± 2.44 and Δ15N = 2.57 ± 1.72 (mean ± 1SD, n = 27 and 65, respectively), calculated as the average of the enrichment factors of marine crustaceans feeding on animal items reported in [58] and more consistent with other literature synthesis focused on crustaceans [59,60].
To compare the isotopic niche areas of P. segnis males and females and to assess their overlap, we use standard ellipse area (SEA) as a measure of the mean core population isotopic niche [61]. In brief, the standard ellipse of a set of bivariate data is calculated from the variance and covariance of the x and y data and contains approximately 40% of the data. Accordingly, it represents the core niche area and is expected to be insensitive to sample size. Given the different number of sampled males and females (see Results), we used a sample size-corrected version of the standard ellipse area (SEAc hereafter) [61]. In order to compare the isotopic niche area between sexes, a Bayesian approach was used that calculated 100,000 posterior iterations of SEA (SEAB) based on the data set. Pair-wise comparisons were subsequently performed by calculating the proportion of SEAB that differed between the two sexes and interpreting it as a direct proxy for the probability that one group was larger than the other [61].
Statistical analyses were performed in the R statistical environment [62]. Specifically, PERMANOVA was run in the vegan package [63], standard ellipse areas were calculated using SIBER [61,64], and trophic positions were estimated using tRophicPosition [65,66]. The function “pairwiseComparisons” available in SIBER was used to statistically compare in a Bayesian context the trophic position values estimated for the different taxa and for adult and immature P. segnis males and females.

3. Results

3.1. Composition of Collected Samples

A total of 92 specimens belonging to 12 animal species were collected (Table 1). Seven Portunus segnis individuals, five males and two females, were captured in crab traps. Males ranged in carapace width between 29 and 89 mm (78.8 ± 25.1 mm) while females measured between 97 and 99 mm, respectively; independently from sex, all captured specimens were sexually immature.
Hermit crabs of the genus Diogenes, warty crabs (Eriphia verrucosa), and the gastropods Bolinus brandaris, Cerithium vulgatum, and Hexaplex trunculus were also found in crab traps (Table 1). Among fish, nine specimens were captured in total in crab traps, including bogues (Boops boops) and axillary sea breams (Pagellus acarne); in addition, two NIS were collected, i.e., the reticulated leatherjacket Stephanolepis diaspros and the yellowspotted puffer Torquigener flavimaculosus. Specimens of the bivalve Modiolus barbatus were collected by snorkeling along the western coast of the bay, while Pinctada radiata individuals were collected by hand from the dense beds formed by this non-indigenous bivalve at shallow depths (approximately 1 m) in the eastern sector of the bay (Figure 2).
Forty-nine P. segnis specimens were obtained from local fishermen. They were all mature adults (see an example in Figure 3) ranging in carapace widths between 106 and 175 mm (137.1 ± 17.6 mm, mean ± 1SD); they were predominantly males (40 males vs. 9 females); in addition, four out of nine females were ovigerous.

3.2. Trophic Positions and Isotopic Niche of Portunus Segnis

Among the species analyzed, the bivalves Modiolus barbatus and Pictada radiata were the most 13C- and 15N-depleted, with δ13C values comprised between −19.6 ± 0.6 and −19.9 ± 1.1 (mean ± 1SD), respectively, and δ15N values ranging between 2.4 ± 1.1 and 2.7 ± 0.3 (Figure 4). The isotopic values of the two species were not statistically different (PERMANOVA post-hoc test, t = 0.73, p (Monte Carlo) = 0.56), indicating a negligible variation in nitrogen and carbon sources between bivalves from the eastern (P. radiata) and the western (M. barbatus) sectors of Elounda Bay.
Eriphia verrucosa showed the highest δ15N values, more than 8‰ higher than that of bivalves (Figure 4) and equivalent with a trophic position of 4.2 (Table 2). The warty crab E. verrucosa was the crustacean with the highest trophic position, followed by Diogenes sp. (TP = 3.9) and P. segnis, the latter characterized by a mean trophic position of 3.8 with a 3.3–4.6 95% CI (Table 2). Portunus was isotopically similar to the gastropods Bolinus brandaris, Hexaplex trunculus, and Cerithium vulgatum (Figure 4), and was characterized by remarkably similar trophic position values (Table 2). With the exception of Pagellus acarne, other fish —Stephanolepis diaspros, Torquigener flavimaculosus, and, in particular, Boops boops— were characterized by isotopic values significantly more depleted than those of P. segnis (Figure 4; PERMANOVA post-hoc tests, min t = 2.67, p (Monte Carlo) = 0.004 for the comparison T. flavimaculosus vs. P. segnis). The corresponding trophic positions were relatively low, ranging between 3.4 and 3.5 (B. boops and T. flavimaculosus, respectively; Table 2).
Portunus segnis was characterized by a considerable inter-individual isotopic variability, with δ13C values ranging between −15.9 and −12.5 and δ15N values between 5.7 and 8.9 (Figure 5). Such variability was not related to sex: PERMANOVA procedures did not highlight any significant isotopic difference between males and females (Pseudo-F1,54 = 0.54, p (Monte Carlo) = 0.58), and, among females, there was no difference between reproductive conditions (Pseudo-F1,9 = 0.62, p (Monte Carlo) = 0.51). Negligible sex-related differences were observed in trophic position values (p = 0.47). Only the analysis of isotopic niches indicated that the standard ellipse area (SEAc) of females was significantly smaller (0.61 vs. 1.25 ‰2, p = 0.02) and almost completely overlapping with that of the males (Figure 5; 91% overlap).
In contrast with sex, the individual size of P. segnis specimens significantly co-varied with their isotopic values. Specifically, while δ13C showed no relationship with the size of P. segnis individuals, for mature individuals (>100 mm in carapace widths) a significant positive correlation was observed between size and δ15N values for both males and females (Figure 6), with negligible differences in the slopes of the two regression models (ANCOVA, F1,44 = 0.28, p = 0.59). Conversely, for immature individuals (<100 mm in carapace widths), size co-varied negatively with δ15N (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

The analyses indicated that Portunus segnis in the Elounda Bay food web has a trophic position of 3.8, varying remarkably by almost one trophic level between 3.4 and 4.6 (Table 2). These results confirmed the predatory nature of the species, which is known to feed opportunistically on a wide set of invertebrates (e.g., bivalves, gastropods, crustaceans, polychaetes) and fish taxa [32,67]. In Mediterranean waters, only two studies have previously addressed the trophic habits of P. segnis, both performed in the Gulf of Gabès (Tunisia). Specifically, the isotopic investigation by Annabi and colleagues [39] determined a trophic position of 3.3, with individual values ranging between 2.8 and 3.7. Hamida and colleagues [33] performed stomach content analysis (SCA hereafter) on specimens collected in different seasons but did not estimate their trophic position. Here, using a Monte Carlo routine available in TrophLab (a standalone Microsoft Access routine [68]; downloadable from www.fishbase.org) and the qualitative information on ingested food items provided by the aforementioned study, a mean trophic position value of 3.5 was calculated, broadly confirming the isotopic estimations by Annabi and colleagues. Based only on this scant information, it is not possible to conclude if the trophic position of P. segnis in Elounda bay and in the Gulf of Gabès differs; indeed, SCA-based estimations from native areas provided in [39] ranges between 3.1 and 3.8, suggesting a considerable spatial variability. Thus, further studies are needed to clarify how local variations in prey identity, abundance, and trophic position, coupled with the feeding opportunism of P. segnis, reflect on the trophic habits of the species, and on the role the species plays in recipient food webs.
Noticeably, the trophic position of P. segnis was comparable with that of Pagellus acarne and of the hermit crab Diogenes sp., higher than those characterizing Boops boops and the two NIS Stephanolepis diaspros and Torquigener flavimaculosus, and remarkably lower that the trophic position estimated for the warty crab Eriphia verrucosa (Table 2). The high trophic position value that characterized E. verrucosa confirmed other observations [69] [TP = 3.97], and was related to the diet of the species focused on predatory gastropods (including Bolinus brandaris and Hexaplex trunculus, showing in the present study δ15N values higher or comparable with that of P. segnis), hermit crabs, and other brachyurans [70,71,72,73]. The trophic position values of fish species were consistent with other SCA-based estimations provided in [74] for B. boops (3.52), in [75] for T. flavimaculosus (3.47), and in [76] for S. diaspros (3.32, estimated using TrophLab on individual food items). Together with the similar values obtained from SIA and SCA analysis in P. segnis from the Gulf of Gabès, these values provide a general confirmation of the consistency of the two methodological approaches and of the robustness of the estimations provided in this study.
The negligible differences in isotopic values and trophic position between males and females together with the high overlap (>90%) of the respective isotopic niches generally suggests negligible sex-related differences in feeding habits in P. segnis. These findings contrast with the observations of Hamida and colleagues [77], showing a significant sex-related variation in diet, but are consistent with other studies from native areas [67,78]. It is worth mentioning that our observations were isotopic; to provide detailed information on prey choice using SIA imposes the use of mixing models [79] on isotopic data of all the potential prey of a consumer, and this was beyond the scope of the present investigation. On the other hand, SCA provides only a snapshot of the diet of an individual at the moment of collection, while SIA integrates over longer time periods. Further investigations performed using both SIA and SCA are needed to clarify if any sex-related differentiation in trophic habits characterize P. segnis; additional studies are also necessary to clarify the effect of reproductive state on the trophic habits of females. Hamida et al. found significant differences between ovigerous and non-ovigerous females, only partially confirming the findings of other studies in the Persian Gulf [67,80]. Here, there were no differences due to the reproductive state of females were observed, yet our results must be taken with cautions given the low sample numerosity (nine females in total, six ovigerous). Noticeably, we observed significant differences in SEAc values, indicating that, independently from the number of specimens analyzed, females have a smaller isotopic niche than males. The occurrence of sex- or reproductive state-related differences in isotopic niche width or other metrics deserves to be addressed in the future, since the issue is unexplored for P. segnis as well as for other portunids, while isotopic studies focused on marine brachyurans have provided non-univocal, even contrasting results [15,81,82,83].
Contrary to sex, the results indicated that the ontogenetic stage and size of adults exerted a significant role in determining the δ15N values of P. segnis specimens. Indeed, an evident break was observed between immature and mature individuals, and a size-related shift in adult mature specimens (Figure 6). Noticeably, in the present study immature individuals were all collected using crab traps, while adults were captured by fishermen using gillnets. This ultimately indicates that only the use of different sampling methods may allow for the collection of P. segnis specimens that span one order of magnitude in carapace width, and that are fully representative of the whole size range and ontogenetic stages characterizing the population under analysis.
In large-sized crustaceans, gonadal maturation induces a strong metabolic and physiological trade-off between investment in somatic or reproductive tissues reflecting significantly in their trophic habits and literature cited therein [84]. In portunids in particular, juveniles pass through frequent molting stages during growth. Calcium is required for shell formation, therefore, juvenile crabs would prefer shelled mollusks and crustaceans [85,86]. This is confirmed by studies on P. segnis from Persian waters and on the congener P. pelagicus from the Indian Ocean: significant dietary shifts have been observed between immature juveniles < 90–100 mm and mature adults [32,67,87,88,89]. For adults, no information on size-related shifts are available for P. segnis beside the present study; for P. pelagicus significant differences were highlighted among adult size groups, indicating that as crabs increase in size they become more active and efficient in capturing larger and more mobile prey such as fish and decapods, including conspecifics [89]. Even though additional SIA and SCA studies are necessary, in particular focusing on immature stages of the crab, our findings clearly suggest that P. segnis, depending on its ontogenetic stage and size once it reaches the adult stage, varies considerably its role within the food web of Elounda Bay. Accordingly, future strategies of commercial exploitation of P. segnis should take into consideration the possibility of controlling and mitigating the species’ impacts on different components of the native community through the promotion of appropriate sampling gears that target specific life stages and size classes of the population, as preliminarily demonstrated in the present study.

5. Conclusions

The present investigation provided original data on the trophic position of the swimming blue crab P. segnis in Elounda Bay as compared with other invertebrate and fish taxa occurring in the embayment, further suggesting previously unexplored ontogenetic and size-related variations in the trophic habits of the species. It is worth emphasizing the preliminary nature of the study: analyses were carried out only in late spring and focused on a reduced set of species; as such, they were not necessarily representative of the complexity of the food web characterizing the area. Nonetheless, by adopting a robust SIA-based methodological approach to investigate the trophic ecology of P. segnis, the study presented evidence of a number of ecological issues that may be further investigated in the future by more extensive studies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su142215202/s1, Table S1: “occurrences of Portunus segnis in the Mediterranean Sea as of 17 September 2022”. References [90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.M. and S.V.; methodology, G.M., S.V., T.D., G.S., P.K. (Panagiotis Kasapidis), P.K. (Panayota Koulouri) and C.D.; formal analysis, G.M., M.T.G. and R.B.; investigation, G.M., T.D., G.S., P.K.; data curation, G.M. and M.T.G.; writing—original draft preparation, G.M. and C.D.M.; writing—review and editing, all authors; funding acquisition, G.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the ASSEMBLE PLUS transnational access project CALPORT—A preliminary assessment of the population structure and trophic ecology of the invasive portunids Callinectes sapidus and Portunus segnis coexisting in coastal habitats of Crete (Greece)—(Project No. 11046).

Institutional Review Board Statement

No ethical issues related with the use of animals in the performed analyses were involved.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data on trophic enrichments factors used in this study are openly available in FigShare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21206663.v1 accessed on 14 November 2022; while the occurrence data used to produce Figure 1 are included in the Supplementary Materials. Isotopic data are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to ongoing comparative analyses.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the fishermen from the towns of Elounda and Plaka for their help during field operations, and three anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved an early draft of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A. Compilation of Portunus segnis Occurrences in the Mediterranean Sea

The general procedure is described in detail in Mancinelli et al. [114] for the Atlantic blue crab Callinectes sapidus. In brief, between 16–19 September 2022, the online databases ISI Web of Science and Scopus were searched for publications by a multiple search criterion using the terms “Portunus segnis” or “Portunus pelagicus” and “swimming blue crab” in conjunction with “Mediterranean”. The results were complemented with those obtained from queries on Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/ accessed on 14 November 2022) using identical keywords and subsequently saved using the freeware Harzings’s Publish or Perish ver. 7.27.284953. Only the studies providing the coordinates of the record location or, alternatively, a univocal indication on a map (in this case, maps were digitized, georeferenced, and the coordinates of the location recorded) were selected. Figures were digitized after a fivefold enlargement and converted to numerical form using the graph capture freeware WebPlotDigitizer (ver. 4.5; https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer/ accessed on 14 November 2022). For those studies where sampling locations had no coordinates but were reported in maps, all contextual information was used to locate the geographic area of the study in Google Earth. Maps were extracted using the freeware GIMP (ver. 2.10.20; https://www.gimp.org/ accessed on 14 November 2022), overlaid to the study area in Google Earth, and adjusted to match the background. Subsequently, the sampling area was georeferenced using place marks; the coordinates of the area were used to estimate the latitude and longitude in decimal degrees of its centroid using the centroid function in the R package geosphere [115]. In addition, occurrences of Portunus segnis in the Mediterranean Sea were retrieved from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, www.gbif.org accessed on 14 November 2022), the Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS, www.obis.org accessed on 14 November 2022), and the citizen science initiative iNaturalist (https://www.inaturalist.org/ accessed on 14 November 2022). After removing duplicates, the final version of the dataset included 115 unique records of P. segnis (Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials).

Appendix B

Table
Table A1. C:N Ratios (Means ± 1SD, and Min-Max Range) Characterizing the Tissues of the Taxa Collected in the Present Study.
Table A1. C:N Ratios (Means ± 1SD, and Min-Max Range) Characterizing the Tissues of the Taxa Collected in the Present Study.
PhylumSpeciesC:NC:N Range
ArthropodaDiogenes sp.5.1 ± 0.64.4–5.6
Eriphia verrucosa3.4 ± 0.13.3–3.4
Portunus segnis3.4 ± 0.22.5–4.1
ChordataBoops boops3.5 ± 0.23.4–3.7
Pagellus acarne3.2 ± 0.13.1–3.3
Stephanolepis diaspros2.9 ± 0.13–3.1
Torquigener flavimaculosus3.1 ± 0.13.1–3.2
MolluscaBolinus brandaris3.5 ± 0.23.3–3.6
Cerithium vulgatum4.1 ± 0.33.7–4.2
Hexaplex trunculus3.7 ± 0.13.5–3.8
Modiolus barbatus4.9 ± 0.64.3–5.7
Pinctada radiata4.3 ± 0.14.2–4.4

References

  1. Coll, M.; Piroddi, C.; Steenbeek, J.; Kaschner, K.; Lasram, F.B.R.; Aguzzi, J.; Ballesteros, E.; Bianchi, C.N.; Corbera, J.; Dailianis, T. The biodiversity of the Mediterranean Sea: Estimates, patterns, and threats. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Coll, M.; Piroddi, C.; Albouy, C.; Ben Rais Lasram, F.; Cheung, W.W.L.; Christensen, V.; Karpouzi, V.S.; Guilhaumon, F.; Mouillot, D.; Paleczny, M.; et al. The Mediterranean Sea under siege: Spatial overlap between marine biodiversity, cumulative threats and marine reserves. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, 21, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Katsanevakis, S.; Coll, M.; Piroddi, C.; Steenbeek, J.; Ben Rais Lasram, F.; Zenetos, A.; Cardoso, A.C. Invading the Mediterranean Sea: Biodiversity patterns shaped by human activities. Front. Mar. Sci. 2014, 1, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Katsanevakis, S.; Tempera, F.; Teixeira, H. Mapping the impact of alien species on marine ecosystems: The Mediterranean Sea case study. Divers. Distrib. 2016, 22, 694–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Galil, B.S.; Marchini, A.; Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A. Mare Nostrum, Mare Quod Invaditur-The History of Bioinvasions in the Mediterranean Sea. In Histories of Bioinvasions in the Mediterranean; Queiroz, A.I., Pooley, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 21–49. [Google Scholar]
  6. Essl, F.; Lenzner, B.; Bacher, S.; Bailey, S.; Capinha, C.; Daehler, C.; Dullinger, S.; Genovesi, P.; Hui, C.; Hulme, P.E.; et al. Drivers of future alien species impacts: An expert-based assessment. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020, 26, 4880–4893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tsirintanis, K.; Azzurro, E.; Crocetta, F.; Dimiza, M.; Froglia, C.; Gerovasileiou, V.; Langeneck, J.; Mancinelli, G.; Rosso, A.; Stern, N.; et al. Bioinvasion impacts on biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health in the Mediterranean Sea. Aquat. Invasions 2022, 17, 308–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Courchamp, F.; Fournier, A.; Bellard, C.; Bertelsmeier, C.; Bonnaud, E.; Jeschke, J.M.; Russell, J.C. Invasion biology: Specific problems and possible solutions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2017, 32, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Torchin, M.E.; Freestone, A.L.; McCann, L.; Larson, K.; SchlÖder, C.; Steves, B.P.; Fofonoff, P.; Repetto, M.F.; Ruiz, G.M. Asymmetry of marine invasions across tropical oceans. Ecology 2021, 102, e03434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Watkins, H.V.; Yan, H.F.; Dunic, J.C.; Côté, I.M. Research biases create overrepresented “poster children” of marine invasion ecology. Conserv. Lett. 2021, 14, e12802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Elton, C.S. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants; Chapman & Hall: New York, NY, USA, 1958; p. 181. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zaret, T.M.; Paine, R.T. Species introduction in a tropical lake. Science 1973, 182, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sakai, A.K.; Allendorf, F.W.; Holt, J.S.; Lodge, D.M.; Molofsky, J.; With, K.A.; Baughman, S.; Cabin, R.J.; Cohen, J.E.; Ellstrand, N.C.; et al. The Population Biology of Invasive Species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2001, 32, 305–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. David, P.; Thébault, E.; Anneville, O.; Duyck, P.F.; Chapuis, E.; Loeuille, N. Impacts of Invasive Species on Food Webs: A Review of Empirical Data. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2017, 56, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fuhrmann, M.M.; Pedersen, T.; Nilssen, E.M. Trophic niche of the invasive red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus in a benthic food web. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2017, 565, 113–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bartley, T.J.; McCann, K.S.; Bieg, C.; Cazelles, K.; Granados, M.; Guzzo, M.M.; MacDougall, A.S.; Tunney, T.D.; McMeans, B.C. Food web rewiring in a changing world. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hui, C.; Richardson, D.M. How to invade an ecological network. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2019, 34, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Frost, C.M.; Allen, W.J.; Courchamp, F.; Jeschke, J.M.; Saul, W.-C.; Wardle, D.A. Using network theory to understand and predict biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2019, 34, 831–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Grosholz, E.D.; Ruiz, G.M.; Dean, C.A.; Shirley, K.A.; Maron, J.L.; Connors, P.G. The impacts of a nonindigenous marine predator in a California bay. Ecology 2000, 81, 1206–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Snyder, W.E.; Evans, E.W. Ecological effects of invasive arthropod generalist predators. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2006, 37, 95–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Thomsen, M.S.; Byers, J.E.; Schiel, D.R.; Bruno, J.F.; Olden, J.D.; Wernberg, T.; Silliman, B.R. Impacts of marine invaders on biodiversity depend on trophic position and functional similarity. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2014, 495, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Galil, B.S. The Alien Crustaceans in the Mediterranean Sea: An Historical Review. In The Wrong Place-Alien Marine Crustaceans: Distribution, Biology and Impacts; Galil, B.S., Clark, P.F., Carlton, J.T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 377–401. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fox, H.M. The migration of a Red Sea crab through the Suez Canal. Nature 1924, 113, 714–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tureli, C.; Yesilyurt, I.N. Reproductive biology of blue swimming crab, Portunus segnis (Forskal, 1775) in Yumurtalık Cove, Northeastern Mediterranean, Turkey. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2017, 18, 424–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rabaoui, L.; Arculeo, M.; Mansour, L.; Tlig-Zouari, S. Occurrence of the lessepsian species Portunus segnis (Crustacea: Decapoda) in the Gulf of Gabès (Tunisia): First record and new information on its biology and ecology. Cah. Biol. Mar. 2015, 56, 169–175. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rifi, M.; Ounifi Ben Amor, K.; Ben Souissi, J.; Zaouali, J. Première mention du crabe lessepsien Portunus segnis (Forskål, 1775) (Décapode, Brachyoure, Portunidae) dans les eaux marines Tunisiennes. In Proceedings of the 4ème Congrès Franco-Maghrébin et 5èmes Journées Franco-Tunisiennes de Zoologie, Korba, Tunisie, 13–17 November 2014; p. 9. [Google Scholar]
  27. Shaiek, M.; El Zrelli, R.; Crocetta, F.; Mansour, L.; Rabaoui, L. On the occurrence of three exotic decapods, Callinectes sapidus (Portunidae), Portunus segnis (Portunidae), and Trachysalambria palaestinensis (Penaeidae), in northern Tunisia, with updates on the distribution of the two invasive portunids in the Mediterranean Sea. Bioinvasions Rec. 2021, 10, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Deidun, A.; Sciberras, A. A further record of the blue swimmer crab Portunus segnis Forskal, 1775 (Decapoda: Brachyura: Portunidae) from the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean). Bioinvasions Rec. 2016, 5, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Corsini-Foka, M.; Abdulghani, A.; Al Mabruk, S.A.; Abdulrraziq, A.A.; Ibrahim, S.M.; Scannella, D.; Zava, B.; Deidun, A.; Gianguzza, P. Invasive portunid crabs in Libyan waters: First record of the Atlantic blue crab Callinectes sapidus Rathbun, 1896 and range expansion of the swimming blue crab Portunus segnis (Forskål, 1775). Bioinvasions Rec. 2021, 10, 885–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Katsanevakis, S.; Poursanidis, D.; Hoffman, R.; Rizgalla, J.; Rothman, S.B.-S.; Levitt-Barmats, Y.a.; Hadjioannou, L.; Trkov, D.; Garmendia, J.M.; Rizzo, M.; et al. Unpublished Mediterranean records of marine alien and cryptogenic species. Bioinvasions Rec. 2020, 9, 165–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hosseini, M.; Pazooki, J.; Safaei, M. Size at maturity, sex ratio and variant morphometrics of blue swimming crab Portunus segnis (Forskål, 1775) from Boushehr Coast (Persian Gulf). J. Mar. Sci. Res. Dev. 2014, 4, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Hosseini, M.; Pazooki, J.; Safaie, M.; Tadi-Beni, F. The biology of the blue swimming crab Portunus segnis (Forskal, 1775) along the Bushehr coasts, Persian Gulf. Env. Stud. Persian Gulf 2014, 1, 81–92. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hamida, B.A.B.H.O.; Hamida, B.H.N.; Ammar, R.; Chaouch, H.; Missaoui, H. Feeding habits of the swimming blue crab Portunus segnis (Forskål, 1775) (Brachyura: Portunidae) in the Mediterranean. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2019, 99, 1343–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abdel Razek, F.A.; Taha, S.M.; Ameran, A.A. Population biology of the edible crab Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus) from Bardawil lagoon, Northern Sinai, Egypt. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2006, 32, 401–418. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hajjej, G.; Sley, A.; Jarboui, O. Morphometrics and length-weight relationship in the blue swimming crab, Portunus segnis (Decapoda, Brachyura) from the gulf of Gabès, Tunisia. Int. J. Eng. App. Sci. 2016, 3, 10–16. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bejaoui, S.; Ghribi, F.; Hatira, S.; Chetoui, I.; Rebah, I.; Cafsi, M.h.E. First investigation in the biochemical analysis of the invasive crab Portunus segnis from Tunisian waters. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2017, 94, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hamdi, M.; Hammami, A.; Hajji, S.; Jridi, M.; Nasri, M.; Nasri, R. Chitin extraction from blue crab (Portunus segnis) and shrimp (Penaeus kerathurus) shells using digestive alkaline proteases from P. segnis viscera. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 101, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jabeur, F.; Mechri, S.; Mensi, F.; Gharbi, I.; Naser, Y.B.; Kriaa, M.; Bejaoui, N.; Bachouche, S.; Badis, A.; Annane, R.; et al. Extraction and characterization of chitin, chitosan, and protein hydrolysate from the invasive Pacific blue crab, Portunus segnis (Forskål, 1775) having potential biological activities. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 36023–36039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Annabi, A.; Bardelli, R.; Vizzini, S.; Mancinelli, G. Baseline assessment of heavy metals content and trophic position of the invasive blue swimming crab Portunus segnis (Forskål, 1775) in the Gulf of Gabès (Tunisia). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 136, 454–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Koulouri, P.; Kalogirou, S.; Maidanou, M.; Koutsoubas, D.; Dounas, C. Fish and cephalopod assemblage structure of green alga Caulerpa prolifera (Chlorophyta) meadow in the eastern Mediterranean Sea (Elounda Bay, Crete Island). Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2016, 3, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Maidanou, M.; Koulouri, P.; Arvanitidis, C.; Koutsoubas, D.; Dounas, C. Macrobenthic assemblage structure associated with a Caulerpa prolifera meadow in the eastern Mediterranean Sea (Elounda Bay, Crete Island). Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2017, 14, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vander Zanden, M.J.; Casselman, J.M.; Rasmussen, J.B. Stable isotope evidence for the food web consequences of species invasions in lakes. Nature 1999, 401, 464–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jackson, M.C.; Donohue, I.; Jackson, A.L.; Britton, J.R.; Harper, D.M.; Grey, J. Population-level metrics of trophic structure based on stable isotopes and their application to invasion ecology. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Skouradakis, G.; Dounas, C.; Androulakis, D.N.; Papadaki, M.; Koulouri, P.; Pavlidis, M. A Study of Arca noae (Linnaeus, 1758) in Elounda Bay, Crete, Eastern Mediterranean. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dounas, C. Environmental Study of Elounda Bay. Lasithi Prefecture, Crete (Greece), HCMR Technical Report. 2006; 316. (In Greek)
  46. Maidanou, M.; Koulouri, P.; Karachle, P.K.; Arvanitidis, C.; Koutsoubas, D.; Dounas, C. Trophic diversity of a fish community associated with a Caulerpa prolifera (Forsskål) meadow in a shallow semi-enclosed embayment. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Reeby, J.; Prasad, P.N.; Kusuma, M.S. Size at maturity in the male crabs of Portunus sanguinolentus and P. pelagicus. Fish. Technol. Soc. Fish. Technol. 1990, 27, 115–119. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kumar, M.S.; Xiao, Y.; Venema, S.; Hooper, G. Reproductive cycle of the blue swimmer crab, Portunus pelagicus, off southern Australia. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2003, 83, 983–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Post, D.M.; Layman, C.A.; Arrington, D.A.; Takimoto, G.; Quattrochi, J.; Montana, C.G. Getting to the fat of the matter: Models, methods and assumptions for dealing with lipids in stable isotope analyses. Oecologia 2007, 152, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Logan, J.M.; Jardine, T.D.; Miller, T.J.; Bunn, S.E.; Cunjak, R.A.; Lutcavage, M.E. Lipid corrections in carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analyses: Comparison of chemical extraction and modelling methods. J. Anim. Ecol. 2008, 77, 838–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Anderson, M.J. PERMANOVA. In Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance; Department of Statistics, University of Auckland: Auckland, New Zealand, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kjeldgaard, M.K.; Hewlett, J.A.; Eubanks, M.D. Widespread variation in stable isotope trophic position estimates: Patterns, causes, and potential consequences. Ecol. Monogr. 2021, 91, e01451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cabana, G.; Rasmussen, J.B. Comparison of aquatic food chains using nitrogen isotopes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 10844–10847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Vander Zanden, M.J.; Rasmussen, J.B. Primary consumer δ13C and δ15N and the trophic position of aquatic consumers. Ecology 1999, 80, 1395–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fukumori, K.; Oi, M.; Doi, H.; Takahashi, D.; Okuda, N.; Miller, T.W.; Kuwae, M.; Miyasaka, H.; Genkai-Kato, M.; Koizumi, Y.; et al. Bivalve tissue as a carbon and nitrogen isotope baseline indicator in coastal ecosystems. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2008, 79, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Walters, A.; Robert, M.; Cresson, P.; Le Bris, H.; Kopp, D. Food web structure in relation to environmental drivers across a continental shelf ecosystem. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2021, 66, 2563–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Post, D.M. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: Models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 2002, 83, 703–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mancinelli, G.; Bardelli, R. An updated dataset of published carbon and nitrogen trophic enrichment factors (Δ13C and Δ15N) for aquatic crustacean taxa. Figshare Dataset 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Vanderklift, M.; Ponsard, S. Sources of variation in consumer-diet δ15N enrichment: A meta-analysis. Oecologia 2003, 136, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mancini, F.; De Giorgi, R.; Ludovisi, A.; Vizzini, S.; Mancinelli, G. Ontogenetic shift in the trophic role of the invasive killer shrimp Dikerogammarus villosus: A stable isotope study. Biol. Invasions 2021, 23, 1803–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jackson, A.L.; Inger, R.; Parnell, A.C.; Bearhop, S. Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER–Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses in R. J. Anim. Ecol. 2011, 80, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2022; Available online: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 14 November 2022).
  63. Oksanen, J.; Simpson, G.L.; Guillaume, B.F.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; Minchin, P.R.; O’Hara, R.B.; Solymos, P.; Stevens, M.H.H.; Szoecs, E.; et al. Vegan-Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.6-2. 2022. Available online: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan (accessed on 14 November 2022).
  64. Jackson, A.L.; Parnell, A.C. SIBER: Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses in R. R Package Version 2.1.6. 2021. Available online: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/SIBER (accessed on 14 November 2022).
  65. Quezada-Romegialli, C.; Jackson, A.L.; Hayden, B.; Kahilainen, K.K.; Lopes, C.; Harrod, C. tRophicPosition, an r package for the Bayesian estimation of trophic position from consumer stable isotope ratios. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2018, 9, 1592–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Quezada-Romegialli, C.; Jackson, A.L.; Harrod, C. tRophicPosition: Bayesian Trophic Position Calculation with Stable Isotopes. R Package Version 0.7.7. 2019. Available online: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tRophicPosition (accessed on 14 November 2022).
  67. Safaie, M. Feeding habits of blue swimming crab Portunus segnis (Forskal, 1775) in the northern coastal waters of Iran. Mar. Biodivers. Rec. 2016, 9, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Pauly, D.; Froese, R.; Sa-a, P.; Palomares, M.L.; Christensen, V.; Rius, J. TrophLab Manual; ICLARM: Manila, Philippines, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  69. Mancinelli, G.; Carrozzo, L.; Marini, G.; Costantini, M.L.; Rossi, L.; Pinna, M. Occurrence of the Atlantic blue crab Callinectes sapidus (Decapoda, Brachyura, Portunidae) in two Mediterranean coastal habitats: Temporary visitor or permanent resident? Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2013, 135, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rossi, A.C.; Parisi, V. Experimental studies of predation by the crab Eriphia verrucosa on both snail and hermit crab occupants of conspecific gastropod shells. Boll. Zool. 1973, 40, 117–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Silva, A.C.; Silva, I.C.; Hawkins, S.J.; Boaventura, D.M.; Thompson, R.C. Cheliped morphological variation of the intertidal crab Eriphia verrucosa across shores of differing exposure to wave action. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2010, 391, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Silva, A.C.F.; Shapouri, M.; Cereja, R.; Dissanayake, A.; Vinagre, C. Variations in crab claw morphology and diet across contrasting inter-tidal habitats. Mar. Ecol. 2017, 38, e12374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fouda, M.M.; El-Sayed, A.A.M.; El-Damhougy, K.A.; Salama, A.F. Partitioning of food resources at the intertidal zones between the marble rocky crab, Pachygrapsus maromratus (Grapsidae) and warty crab, Eriphia verrucosa (Eriphiidae) along the Mediterranean Sea coasts, Alexandria, Egypt. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. B Zool. 2015, 7, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Karachle, P.K.; Stergiou, K.I. The effect of season and sex on trophic levels of marine fishes. J. Fish Biol. 2008, 72, 1463–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chartosia, N.; Michalidis, N.; Constantinou, A.; Karachle, P.K. Shedding light on the diet of the Lessepsian yellowspotted puffer Torquigener flavimaculosus Hardy and Randall, 1983 in the Eastern Mediterranean. Acta Adriat. 2021, 62, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zouari-Ktari, R.; Bradai, M.-N.; Bouain, A. The feeding habits of the Lessepsian fish Stephanolepis diaspros (Fraser-Brunner, 1940) in the Gulf of Gabès (eastern Mediterranean Sea). Cah. Biol. Mar. 2008, 49, 329–335. [Google Scholar]
  77. Hadj Hamida, O.B.A.-B.; Hadj Hamida, N.B.; Chaouch, H.; Nafkha, B.; Ben Ali, N.; Abidi, D.; Missaoui, H. Reproductive biology of the blue swimming crab Portunus segnis (Forskål, 1775) (Brachyura: Portunidae) in the Gulf of Gabes (southeastern Tunisia, central Mediterranean Sea). Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 2022, 44, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pazooki, J.; Hosseini, M.; Zadeh, A.V. The dietary compositions of the blue swimming crab, Portunus segnis (Forskal, 1775) from Persian Gulf, South Iran. World Appl. Sci. J. 2012, 20, 416–422. [Google Scholar]
  79. Phillips, D.L. Converting isotope values to diet composition: The use of mixing models. J. Mammal. 2012, 93, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Sadeghi, M.S.; Pazooki, J.; Hosseini, M.; Beni, F.T. Food supply and influences of reproduction activity on the feeding activity in the blue swimming crab Portunus segnis (Forskal, 1775) from Northwest of Persian Gulf. Indian J. Geo-Mar. Sci. 2018, 47, 464–468. [Google Scholar]
  81. Andrade, C.; Rivera, C.; Daza, E.; Almonacid, E.; Ovando, F.; Morello, F.; Pardo, L.M. Trophic niche dynamics and diet partitioning of king crab Lithodes santolla in Chile’s sub-Antarctic water. Diversity 2022, 14, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Guerao, G.; Rotllant, G.; Gisbert, E.; Uyà, M.; Cardona, L. Consistent habitat segregation between sexes in the spider crabs Maja brachydactyla and Maja squinado (Brachyura), as revealed by stable isotopes. Sci. Mar. 2016, 80, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Al-Wazzan, Z.; Giménez, L.; Behbehani, M.; Le Vay, L. Trophic niche separation in sympatric rocky shore crabs. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 2019, 99, 1171–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Longo, E.; Mancinelli, G. Size at the onset of maturity (SOM) revealed in length-weight relationships of brackish amphipods and isopods: An information theory approach. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2014, 136, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Williams, M.J. Natural food and feeding in the commercial sand crab Portunus pelagicus Linnaeus, 1766 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Portunidae) in Moreton Bay, Queensland. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1982, 59, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cannicci, S.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F.; Dyane, A.; Vannini, M. Natural diet and feeding habits of Thalamita crenata (Decapoda: Portunidae). J. Crustac. Biol. 1996, 16, 678–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Josileen, J. Food and feeding of the blue swimmer crab, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Decapoda, Brachyura) along the coast of Mandapam, Tamil Nadu, India. Crustaceana 2011, 84, 1169–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Kunsook, C.; Gajaseni, N.; Paphavasit, N. The feeding ecology of the blue swimming crab, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758), at Kung Krabaen Bay, Chanthaburi Province, Thailand. Trop. Life Sci. Res. 2014, 25, 13–27. [Google Scholar]
  89. de Lestang, S.; Platell, M.E.; Potter, I.C. Dietary composition of the blue swimmer crab Portunus pelagicus L.: Does it vary with body size and shell state and between estuaries? J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2000, 246, 241–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. iNaturalist.org. iNaturalist Occurrence Download (17 September 2022). Available online: https://www.inaturalist.org/ (accessed on 14 November 2022).
  91. Demetropoulos, A.; Neocleous, D. The fishes and crustaceans of Cyprus. Fish. Bull. Min. Agricol. Nat. Res. Cyprus 1969, 1, 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  92. Corsini-Foka, M.; Kondilatos, G.; Economidis, P.S. Occurrence of the lessepsian species Portunus pelagicus (Crustacea) and Apogon pharaonis (Pisces) in the marine area of Rhodes Island. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2004, 5, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. GBIF.org. GBIF Occurrence Download (17 September 2022). Available online: www.gbif.org (accessed on 14 November 2022).
  94. Lai, J.C.Y.; Ng, P.K.L.; Davie, P.J.F. A revision of the Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) species complex (Crustacea: Brachyura: Portunidae), with the recognition of four species. Raffles Bull. Zool. 2010, 58, 199–237. [Google Scholar]
  95. Maggio, T.; Perzia, P.; Falautano, M.; Visconti, G.; Castriota, L. From LEK to LAB: The case of the blue crab Portunus segnis in the Pelagie Islands Marine Protected Area, central Mediterranean Sea. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2022, 219, 106043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Crocetta, F. First record of Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Decapoda, Brachyura, Portunidae) in the northern Tyrrhenian Sea. Crustaceana 2006, 79, 1145–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Ghisotti, F. Il Callinectes sapidus Rathbun nel Mediterraneo (Crustacea Decapoda). Natura 1966, 57, 177–180. [Google Scholar]
  98. Catalano, D.; Torchia, G.; Pititto, F.; Greco, R. Contaminazione da metalli del “granchio americano”, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) nella Rada di Augusta (Sicilia Orientale). Biol. Mar. Mediterr. 2006, 13, 696–699. [Google Scholar]
  99. Cavaliere, A.; Berdar, A. Presenza di Callinectes sapidus Rathbun (Decapoda Brachyura) nello Stretto di Messina. Boll. Pesca Pisc. Idrobiol. 1975, 30, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  100. Bonanno, A.; De Domenico, F.; Profeta, A.; Spanò, N. The first find of Portunus pelagicus (Decapoda, Brachyura) in the Straits of Messina (central Mediterranean Sea). Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer Medit. 2004, 37, 495. [Google Scholar]
  101. Steinitz, W. Die Wanderung indopazifischer Arten ins Mittelmeer seit Beginn der Quartar-periode. Int. Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol. 1929, 22, 1–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Shakman, E.A.; Abdalha, A.B.; Talha, F.; Al-Faturi, A.; Bariche, M. First records of seven marine organisms of different origins from Libya (Mediterranean Sea). BioInvasions Rec. 2017, 6, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Shakman, E.; Eteayb, K.; Taboni, I.; Abdalha, A.B. Status of marine alien species along the Libyan coast. J. Black Sea/Mediterr. Environ. 2019, 25, 188–209. [Google Scholar]
  104. Crocetta, F.; Agius, D.; Balistreri, P.; Bariche, M.; Bayhan, Y.K.; Çakir, M.; Ciriaco, S.; Corsini-Foka, M.; Deidun, A.; El Zrelli, R.; et al. New Mediterranean Biodiversity Records (October 2015). Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2015, 16, 682–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Hasan, H.; Zeini, A.; Noël, P.Y. The marine decapod Crustacea of the area of Lattakia, Syria. Crustaceana 2008, 81, 513–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Karaa, S.; Enajjar, S.; Glid, A.; Bradai, M.N. The first record of the barnacle Chelonibia patula (Ranzani, 1818), hosted by the swimming crab Portunus segnis (Forskål, 1775) in the gulf of Gabès. Bull. Inst. Nat. Sci. Tech. Mer Salammbô 2018, 45, 89–91. [Google Scholar]
  107. Chebaane, S.; Sempere Valverde, J.; Dorai, S.; Kacem, A.; Sghaier, Y.R. A Preliminary inventory of alien and cryptogenic species in Monastir Bay, Tunisia: Spatial distribution, introduction trends and pathways. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2019, 20, 616–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bdioui, M. Premier signalement du crabe bleu Portunus segnis (Forskål, 1775) dans le sud du Golfe de Hammamet (Centre-Est de la Tunisie). Bull. Inst. Nat. Sci. Tech. Mer Salammbô 2016, 43, 183–187. [Google Scholar]
  109. Mili, S.; Ennouri, R.; Ghanem, R.; Rifi, M.; Jaziri, S.; Shaiek, M.; Ben Souissi, J. Additonal and unusual records of bleu crabs Portunus segnis and Callinectes sapidus from the northeastern Tunisian waters (Central Mediterranean Sea). J. New Sci. 2020, 14, 303–311. [Google Scholar]
  110. Olgunoğlu, M.P.; Olgunoğlu, İ.A. Heavy metal contents in blue swimming crab from the Northeastern Mediterranean Sea, Mersin Bay, Turkey. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2016, 25, 2233–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yokes, M.B.; Karhan, S.Ü.; Okus, E.; Yüksek, A.; Aslan, A.; Yilmaz, I.N.; Demirel, N.; Demir, V.; Galil, B. Alien crustacean decapods from the Aegean coast of Turkey. Aquat. Invasions 2007, 2, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Özcan, T. The swimming crab Portunus segnis (Forskål, 1775): Host for the barnacle Chelonibia platula (Ranzani, 1818) from the Turkish coast. J. Black Sea Med. Env. 2012, 18, 271–278. [Google Scholar]
  113. Gruvel, A. Repartition geographique de quelques Crustaces comestibles sur les cotes d’Egypte et de Syrie. C. R. Seances Soc. Biogeogr. 1928, 5, 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  114. Mancinelli, G.; Bardelli, R.; Zenetos, A. A global occurrence database of the Atlantic blue crab Callinectes sapidus. Sci. Data 2021, 8, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Hijmans, R.J.; Williams, E.; Vennes, C. Geosphere. R Package Version 1.5–10. 2019. Available online: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/geosphere (accessed on 14 November 2022).
Sustainability 14 15202 g001 550
Figure 1. Updated distribution map of Portunus segnis in the Mediterranean Sea as of 17 September 2022. The list of occurrences is included in Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials, while the methodology adopted to collate them is described in Appendix A.
Figure 1. Updated distribution map of Portunus segnis in the Mediterranean Sea as of 17 September 2022. The list of occurrences is included in Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials, while the methodology adopted to collate them is described in Appendix A.
Sustainability 14 15202 g001
Sustainability 14 15202 g002 550
Figure 2. Map showing the sampling locations in Elounda Bay. Full circles: crab traps deployed on 25 May; empty circles: crab traps deployed on 26 May. The area identified by the dashed circle shows the location where specimens of the bivalve Pinctada radiata were sampled.
Figure 2. Map showing the sampling locations in Elounda Bay. Full circles: crab traps deployed on 25 May; empty circles: crab traps deployed on 26 May. The area identified by the dashed circle shows the location where specimens of the bivalve Pinctada radiata were sampled.
Sustainability 14 15202 g002
Sustainability 14 15202 g003 550
Figure 3. A female (a) and a male (b) Portunus segnis obtained from fishermen during the study. Please refer to the caliper for the size, since the two images are not to scale.
Figure 3. A female (a) and a male (b) Portunus segnis obtained from fishermen during the study. Please refer to the caliper for the size, since the two images are not to scale.
Sustainability 14 15202 g003
Sustainability 14 15202 g004 550
Figure 4. Isotopic bi-plot of mean δ13C and δ15N values of invertebrate and fish taxa sampled in Elounda Bay. Bars = 1SD. Portunus segnis is highlighted in blue, while bivalves (Modiolus barbatus and Pinctada radiata) are in green.
Figure 4. Isotopic bi-plot of mean δ13C and δ15N values of invertebrate and fish taxa sampled in Elounda Bay. Bars = 1SD. Portunus segnis is highlighted in blue, while bivalves (Modiolus barbatus and Pinctada radiata) are in green.
Sustainability 14 15202 g004
Sustainability 14 15202 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Isotopic bi-plot of Portunus segnis δ13C and δ15N values. Circles indicate the sample size-corrected standard ellipse area (SEAc) for females and males; (b) Density plots of the posterior Bayesian estimates of the standard ellipse area (SEAB) for females and males. Shaded density plots represent 50, 75, and 95% credible intervals in decreasing order of size, with SEAB mode indicated by a black circle and SEAc by a black cross.
Figure 5. (a) Isotopic bi-plot of Portunus segnis δ13C and δ15N values. Circles indicate the sample size-corrected standard ellipse area (SEAc) for females and males; (b) Density plots of the posterior Bayesian estimates of the standard ellipse area (SEAB) for females and males. Shaded density plots represent 50, 75, and 95% credible intervals in decreasing order of size, with SEAB mode indicated by a black circle and SEAc by a black cross.
Sustainability 14 15202 g005
Sustainability 14 15202 g006 550
Figure 6. Relationships between the carapace width of Portunus segnis individuals and their respective δ15N values. Continuous lines indicate best-fitting linear models for mature males (blue line) and females (red line).
Figure 6. Relationships between the carapace width of Portunus segnis individuals and their respective δ15N values. Continuous lines indicate best-fitting linear models for mature males (blue line) and females (red line).
Sustainability 14 15202 g006
Table
Table 1. List of native (N) and non-indigenous (NIS) invertebrate and fish taxa sampled during the study. Mean sizes (±1SD) and size ranges are reported in mm and refer to carapace length for Diogenes sp., carapace widths for the remaining arthropods, standard lengths (i.e., measured from the tip of the snout to the posterior end of the last vertebra) for fish, and shell lengths for mollusks. The number of analyzed specimens is reported in square brackets.
Table 1. List of native (N) and non-indigenous (NIS) invertebrate and fish taxa sampled during the study. Mean sizes (±1SD) and size ranges are reported in mm and refer to carapace length for Diogenes sp., carapace widths for the remaining arthropods, standard lengths (i.e., measured from the tip of the snout to the posterior end of the last vertebra) for fish, and shell lengths for mollusks. The number of analyzed specimens is reported in square brackets.
PhylumSpeciesMean SizeSize RangeStatus
ArthropodaDiogenes sp. [3]11 ± 1.29–13N
Eriphia verrucosa (Forskål, 1775) [3]56.1 ± 15.126–72N
Portunus segnis (Forskål, 1775) [56]131.3 ± 3.429–175NIS
ChordataBoops boops (Linnaeus, 1758) [2]125 ± 8117–133N
Pagellus acarne (Risso, 1827) [2]129.5 ± 15.5114–145N
Stephanolepis diaspros Fraser-Brunner, 1940 [2]130 ± 7123–137NIS
Torquigener flavimaculosus Hardy & Randall, 1983 [3]86.7 ± 6.177–98NIS
MolluscaBolinus brandaris (Linnaeus, 1758) [2]43 ± 1.442–44N
Cerithium vulgatum Bruguière, 1792 [3]44.7 ± 1.542–47N
Hexaplex trunculus (Linnaeus, 1758) [5]39.2 ± 3.228–45N
Modiolus barbatus (Linnaeus, 1758) [5]36.2 ± 1.333–40N
Pinctada radiata (Leach, 1814) [6]66.3 ± 2.457–74NIS
Table
Table 2. Mean trophic positions of Portunus segnis and other invertebrate and fish taxa captured in Elounda Bay. Standard deviations, median, and 95% CI are also reported.
Table 2. Mean trophic positions of Portunus segnis and other invertebrate and fish taxa captured in Elounda Bay. Standard deviations, median, and 95% CI are also reported.
SpeciesMeanSD2.5%50%97.5%
Portunus segnis3.850.313.363.814.58
Bolinus brandaris3.920.43.383.845.01
Boops boops3.420.32.893.394.11
Cerithium vulgatum3.890.33.43.864.58
Diogenes sp.3.920.413.323.845.03
Eriphia verrucosa4.160.423.584.075.29
Hexaplex trunculus3.910.383.373.844.91
Pagellus acarne3.90.483.273.815.39
Stephanolepis diaspros3.490.322.963.454.29
Torquigener flavimaculosus3.540.323.013.54.31
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mancinelli, G.; Dailianis, T.; Dounas, C.; Kasapidis, P.; Koulouri, P.; Skouradakis, G.; Bardelli, R.; Di Muri, C.; Guerra, M.T.; Vizzini, S. Isotopic Niche and Trophic Position of the Invasive Portunid Portunus segnis Forskål, (1775) in Elounda Bay (Crete Island, Eastern Mediterranean). Sustainability 2022, 14, 15202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215202

AMA Style

Mancinelli G, Dailianis T, Dounas C, Kasapidis P, Koulouri P, Skouradakis G, Bardelli R, Di Muri C, Guerra MT, Vizzini S. Isotopic Niche and Trophic Position of the Invasive Portunid Portunus segnis Forskål, (1775) in Elounda Bay (Crete Island, Eastern Mediterranean). Sustainability. 2022; 14(22):15202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215202

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mancinelli, Giorgio, Thanos Dailianis, Costas Dounas, Panagiotis Kasapidis, Panayota Koulouri, Grigorios Skouradakis, Roberta Bardelli, Cristina Di Muri, Maria Teresa Guerra, and Salvatrice Vizzini. 2022. "Isotopic Niche and Trophic Position of the Invasive Portunid Portunus segnis Forskål, (1775) in Elounda Bay (Crete Island, Eastern Mediterranean)" Sustainability 14, no. 22: 15202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215202

APA Style

Mancinelli, G., Dailianis, T., Dounas, C., Kasapidis, P., Koulouri, P., Skouradakis, G., Bardelli, R., Di Muri, C., Guerra, M. T., & Vizzini, S. (2022). Isotopic Niche and Trophic Position of the Invasive Portunid Portunus segnis Forskål, (1775) in Elounda Bay (Crete Island, Eastern Mediterranean). Sustainability, 14(22), 15202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215202

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop