Next Article in Journal
To Be or Not to Be? Strategic Analysis of Carbon Tax Guiding Manufacturers to Choose Low-Carbon Technology
Previous Article in Journal
How to Promote Balanced and Healthy Development of Residents’ Leisure: Based on the Analysis on the Spatiotemporal Evolution of the Scale Structure of Leisure Consumption of Urban Residents in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Digital Transition Methodology of a Warehouse in the Concept of Sustainable Development with an Industrial Case Study

IUT of Bordeaux-Bastide, Department MLT, University of Bordeaux France, CEDEX, 33076 Bordeaux, France
Sustainability 2022, 14(22), 15282; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215282
Submission received: 17 October 2022 / Revised: 5 November 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 17 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainability in Geographic Science)

Abstract

:
Logistics is one of the sectors that is evolving in parallel with Industry 4.0, which refers to the integration of new technologies, information, and agents, with the common goal of improving the efficiency and responsiveness of a logistics management system. The warehouse is an essential link in logistics management, a factor of competitiveness, and a link between the partners of the entire logistics chain. It has become essential to manage warehouses effectively and to allocate their resources efficiently. The digitalization of warehouses is currently one of the research topics of Logistics 4.0. This work presents a methodology of the digital transition of warehouse management, which consists of four main steps: the diagnosis of a warehouse to identify the different processes, the degree of involvement of the employees, a calculation of the degree of maturity to identify the new technology and means of data transfer, and the associated software for the collection of information and the methods of data processing. This digital transition methodology was applied to an industrial company. The results obtained allowed for the improvement of all the indicators measuring the performance of the warehouse on economic, social, and environmental levels.

1. Introduction

For several years now, consumer habits have been constantly evolving, which means that the supply chain has had to adapt. From inventory to order returns management, the warehouse and its logistics are now taking on a 4.0 dimension. The warehouse is no longer considered as a simple storage area; it is now at the heart of the information system and corporate strategy, so it requires an adequate and efficient management of its flow. A warehouse allows for the safe storage of goods. In order to support this role, strategic choices must be made regarding the handling of equipment, the type of pallet racking to be used, and the configuration of the space.
The warehouse is a strategic place that must meet the needs of a structure while satisfying the triad of quality–cost and sustainable development. A warehouse performs the basic functions of receiving, storage, order preparation, and shipping [1,2].
The volatile demand from customers to search for and purchase items at any time has disrupted the entire supply chain from supplier to customer. Manufacturers, distributors, and warehouses are struggling to meet their needs. B2B companies are suffering from the full impact of the digital revolution, as they need to produce, store, and ship items faster and with extreme precision. The “everything now” mentality has spread to all industries, where decision-makers need to secure their bottom line and achieve a strong return on investment, while improving customer satisfaction [3]. The requirements are also numerous: multiplication of references and partners, preparation of heterogeneous pallets in weight and volume, reliable and fast shipments of single products, the arrival of multi-channel, and synergies between physical and digital points of sale that further complicate logistics tasks; hence, there is the need to introduce these new technologies [4].
The answer to these logistical constraints mentioned in the previous paragraph comes thanks to the emergence and consolidation of new technologies, which constitute an important technological revolution that will ensure responsiveness, agility, and customer satisfaction. These new technologies also promote economic, social, and environmental performance [5]. Many 4.0 solutions are proposed on the current market, and, as a consequence, logistics systems are gaining in flexibility and agility. The gradual transition to Supply Chain 4.0 is making the promise of a more flexible and autonomous organization a reality for companies seeking productivity [6], thus meeting the needs of end customers. As a result, the competitiveness of territories goes hand in hand with the growth of technologies. As a result, the competitiveness of territories goes hand in hand with the growth of technologies. This digital transformation allows for a reduction in costs, delays, and traceability and contributes to the competitiveness of the warehouse [7]. A new challenge is added to the digital warehouse, which is to meet the requirements of sustainable development [8]. Faced with the current challenges of sustainable development, traceability, profitability, customer satisfaction, and last-mile deliveries, the objective of this article is to present a classic transformation approach to a connected, high-performance warehouse of the future.
In the literature, I have found that the true impact of these technologies on the supply chain in general, and on the warehouse specifically, is still unclear. Some of the constraints to making a digital transition to a warehouse of the future are cited: complexity of systems, financial investment, lack of skills, insufficient knowledge of these technologies, high degree of IT requirements, security, confidentiality [9], and carbon footprint. The number of warehouses is more and more important, as they are implanted into the territories next to cities; they contribute to economic development, certainly, but their spaces, which occupy thousands of hectares, are used to the detriment of green space for storage and parking roads and are full of implanted activities. With this work, I contribute by providing an effective methodology for the digital transition of a logistics warehouse.
Therefore, my research will be divided into three parts: first, I present a literature review of the scientific research related to the digital supply chain, its advantages, and the impact of digitalization; then, I propose a methodology with different steps to implement the new technologies and design a warehouse of the future in the context of sustainable development. In the third part, I propose a case study of a food company.

2. Analysis of the Literature Review

State of the Art

The warehouse plays an essential role in a company, as it is the intermediary between all stakeholders, ensuring the storage of raw materials, storing finished goods, expediting order picking, and delivering products to their final destination.
Warehouses perform the basic functions of receiving, storage, order picking, and shipping [10]. Some are more complex and also perform distribution and value-added activities.
To cover relevant and recent publications on Warehouse 4.0, I used two scientific search platforms, Scopus and Google Scholar, and two keywords, “Smart Warehouse” and “Warehouse 4.0”. Figure 1 represents the number of publications in which the terms “Smart Warehouse”, “Warehouse 4.0”, and “Logistics 4.0” appeared, based on Scopus.
From the graph, it can be seen that this new concept is an industrial trend that is increasingly attracting the attention of researchers and even companies looking to optimize their management and strengthen their competitiveness in the market. The new technologies used in Warehouse 4.0, which I will mention later, offer solutions to major problems such as: traceability, processing and analysis of massive data, choosing the right decisions, security, order forecasting, etc. [9], which explains the convergence of companies towards this technological option.
In order to determine the most important technologies for a warehouse and for logistics in general, I performed a more specific search, associating the term “Warehouse 4.0” or “Logistics 4.0” with the name of the technology and extracting the number of publications where both keywords are mentioned; thus, I obtained the results represented in Figure 2.
According to this bibliographic research, a Warehouse Management System (WMS), Big Data, Artificial Intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), Radio-Identification (RFID), Machine-to-Machine Communication, and Cloud Computing are the most used technologies by a warehouse. This result can be explained by the need for the collection of information from the various stakeholders in the supply chain by the IoT, Big Data, and processing methods using artificial intelligence.
The concept of the warehouse of the future is addressed by [11]. The authors focused in particular on the strategic planning of the warehouse of the future. The transition of logistics centers has changed with the emergence of the Industry 4.0 era [10]. These technologies are used in logistics operations by practitioners and academics in engineering and operations management to increase performance [12]. The warehouse can integrate 5G technology to schedule and route vehicles [13]. The use of real-time location systems in warehouse management can increase the efficiency and safety of forklift placement, tracking, and order processing [14]. These technologies can manage information on demand and locate the customer to expedite product delivery. In Table 1, we present the main technologies used and their impact on the different activities of the warehouse. These technologies allow the transformation of a traditional warehouse into a digitalized warehouse.
A lot of research has focused on the new 4.0 technologies, but few articles object to the impact of new technologies on sustainable development, which is justified by the number of publications that appeared between 2015–2021, as shown in Figure 3.
Regarding sustainable development and logistics, in 1987, the Brundtland Report, drawn up by the United Nations Commission on Environment and Development, defined Sustainable Development (SD) as “development that meets our needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. Since then, the concept of SD has been progressively adopted around the world. For companies, SD implies that they develop based on three pillars: environmental, social, and economic; this is called corporate social responsibility (CSR).
The concept of sustainable development was born around the 1970s. According to Linton et al. (2007), sustainable development concerns many disciplines such as earth and environmental sciences, medicine, material sciences, agriculture, biology, economics, social sciences, and management sciences such as industrial logistics [33].
There are several definitions of CSR in the literature. The European Commission defines the concept of CSR as “the voluntary integration by companies of social and environmental concerns into their business operations and their interaction with their stakeholders” (European Commission, 2001) [34], as shown in Table 2.
A digitalized warehouse must be able to meet the needs of customers, improve performance by using the fourth revolution technologies, and take into account the requirements of sustainable development from social, economic, and environmental points of view. Table 3 summarizes the main positive sustainable impacts of digital technologies in a warehouse context [40].

3. Methodology

The present research work consists of carrying out a digital transformation of a warehouse within the framework of sustainable development. This research problem is part of the digitalization of a warehouse. What is the transition from a traditional warehouse to a 4.0 warehouse? How to automate the activities of a warehouse to have a connected warehouse? The objective of this work is a method that will facilitate the tasks of a company to operate in their warehouse and will present a decision support tool for principals in logistics to achieve a digital transformation of their warehouse. To answer this problem, the research methodology of this work is in Figure 4.
However, the integration of digitalization in the supply chain is not easy because of many challenges in terms of lack of framework or guide for the adoption of digitalization in the supply chain and the resistance of the staff, the lack of information sharing between the actors of the supply chain, and the cost that can generate this digital transition in terms of technology purchase, training of staff, experts who accompany the companies, etc.
All these constraints can obstruct the supply chain managers in their deployment of digital technologies. To answer this challenge, I will propose a simple and realistic methodology that can be used by companies that want to integrate these new technologies into their logistics processes.
The integration of these technologies must be based on the requirements of the SD that Morocco has invested in, in order to manage natural resources and improve the living environment of its population.

3.1. Steps to Implement 4.0 Technologies in a Warehouse

The digitalization of a warehouse or the transition from a traditional warehouse to Warehouse 4.0 is a major project that requires the strong mobilization of internal resources and the strong support of an expert company that will ensure the good management of the project. The increased consideration of the environment should, however, allow a company to increase its revenue, satisfy its customers, and build a new competitive advantage [55].
The mapping brings together all the activities to describe the approach, following the transfer from a traditional warehouse to Warehouse 4.0, as shown in Figure 4.
This methodology consists of first mapping all the activities to describe the approach to follow for a transfer of a warehouse, which consists of all the related processes and activities, the diagnosis of the measurement of the degree of maturity, the degree of resistance of the employees to the project of digital transition, and the choice of the various technologies and means of data transmission. The digitalization of a warehouse or the transition from a traditional warehouse to Warehouse 4.0 is a major project that requires the strong mobilization of internal resources and the strong support of an expert company that will ensure the good management of the project.
Figure 4. Warehouse digitization step.
Figure 4. Warehouse digitization step.
Sustainability 14 15282 g004

3.2. Identification of Warehouse Logistics’ Processes

Generally, warehousing is divided into 4 basic processes: receiving goods from suppliers, storage, order picking and shipping to the customer. Each process is composed of several functions and subfunctions that describe its activities, as shown in Figure 5.
Saving time and increasing productivity and efficiency, to improve warehouse management, is nowadays a key factor for companies in their race for performance. To increase the level of service and the number of goods stored and to satisfy the needs of customers, it is necessary for a company to manage its stock well. Good warehouse management means knowing the strengths and weaknesses in order to improve them. To do this, I offer a digital maturity diagnosis.
The concept of the “Maturity Model” allows a logistician to describe the level of evolution in the digitalization of their company. It consists of positioning oneself and detecting the problems within the company and setting a roadmap for its evolutionary capacities, while assisting its employees. In addition, the final phase of my model, which is intelligent automation, corresponds to the moment when warehouses will be able to perform predictive operations.
The extensive scientific literature has shown several approaches to measure the level of maturity or readiness to implement Industry 4.0 in a company (Table 4). The common objective is to assess the maturity level of the company’s processes and to provide an indication of the actions needed to increase this level.
Some of these models are called “readiness”, such as the Singapore model [57] and “DREAMY” [58], but none of these can assess the readiness for Industry 4.0 implementation. According to [59], these models do not differentiate between readiness and maturity.
Based on this work, I propose maturity levels adapted to my case study for the evaluation of the existing situation in a warehouse. I have proposed four levels in the form of percentages to measure the initial state of the technologies. The four levels of maturity are defined in Section 3.3.

3.3. Diagnostic 4.0 Digital Maturity

It is important to analyze the situation of the company, to establish an inventory of strengths and weaknesses of the company, so the diagnosis of the digital maturity takes into account the reality of the company, its strategy, and its needs.
With the objective of integrating these new technologies, it is first necessary to carry out a 4.0 diagnosis for each process of the warehouse, to be able to position the company on a scale of maturity concerning Warehouse 4.0. For this purpose, a questionnaire has been established on all the activities of a warehouse. Each element has 4 levels of maturity, where level 1 reflects the total absence of new technologies, and level 4 represents the application of 4.0 technologies.
-
Level 1: 4.0 technologies not used (traditional management mode);
-
Level 2: 4.0 technologies used and not mastered (ERP and WMS);
-
Level 3: 4.0 technologies occasionally used and mastered;
-
Level 4: 4.0 technologies used and mastered (existing tools such as RFID, AR, IoT, AI, Power BI, stacker crane, cyber security, etc.)
The maturity level (MD) of each dimension results from the calculation of the weighted average of all the elemental deadlines (MDIi) in its associated dimension. The weighting factor (gDIi) is equal to the importance rating in the company. The maturity level is calculated using the following formula [60]:
M D = i = 1 n M Dli × g Dli i = 1 n g Dli
where
     M: maturity;
     D: dimension;
     I: item;
     g: weighting factor;
     n: number of maturity.
The results are represented in Table 5.

3.4. New Warehouse Technologies

The technologies deployed in Warehouse 4.0 generally allow for the circulation of goods, flexibility and reactivity in order to handle more flows, and improvement of the situation of employees and the working environment [61]. It is impossible to dissociate the digital transformation processes from the technologies that are at the heart of Industry 4.0. To contextualize, I review the main technologies related to digital transformation in warehouse management [40]; these are changing the way a warehouse is managed, as shown in Figure 6. This figure shows the main Industry 4.0 technologies most often used in a warehouse, as cited in the literature review (see Section 2.1)

4. Case Study

4.1. Company Presentation

In an effort to validate my research on the digital transition to Warehouse 4.0, I integrated new Industry 4.0 technologies. My case study is an international food and beverage manufacturing company. This company agreed to engage in this exercise by providing me with the space, time, and data on the production and logistics activities of its warehouse.
The technologies deployed in Warehouse 4.0 generally allow a beverage distribution company to run 60 products, with 12 flavors and five different volumes for each product (2 l, 1.5 l, 0.5 l, and 33 cl). The average amount of production per day is 400,000 units, which reaches 500,000 products per day in the peak seasons. These products are stored in a warehouse (which is the case study) and shipped to customers.
In order to stand out from its competitors, the company wishes to improve and develop the performance of its warehouse by integrating new technologies to improve its reactivity, avoid stockouts, and accurately forecast the flow of products (order and production), while improving its environmental and societal performance. The integration process begins with various identification diagnoses (process, degree of maturity, cause of resistance to change, and technological needs). Following these diagnoses, an action plan is developed for a better digital transition.

4.2. Issues

My case study is a company that seeks to improve its warehouse management by integrating the 4.0 technologies necessary to achieve its performance. Currently, the company’s warehouse relies on a labor force and faces the improvement and optimization of its warehousing processes, through the implementation of technologies to solve problems such as: control of supply to avoid stock shortage, mislocation of lots, optimization of warehouse space, delayed deliveries responsiveness, flexibility, high demand for certain seasons, etc. In order to measure the evolution of the performance, I will establish indicators.

4.3. Diagnostique Multidimensionnel

In order to proceed to the identification of the processes of a logistics warehouse, I started by carrying out, with the help of a diagnosis, an analysis of the existing functioning: which tasks the operators carry out, the time of each task (to evaluate the productivity), the management of the stock, the difficulties, the condition of work, etc.
In parallel, I also evaluated the expectations and fears of the employees that were necessary to succeed in this digital transition project; thirdly, I calculated the degree of digital maturity in order to establish an action plan.
A questionnaire is used in order to calculate the degree of digital maturity and to propose new technologies.

Identifying Process

Before implementing new technologies in the logistics processes of a warehouse, it is necessary to understand what they are and how they work. This allows for an idea of what exists and what can be done to improve things.
Following an established questionnaire, I identified the different processes of the warehouse and the different related activities of the warehouse.
Logistics flows and processes refer to the activities that are carried out successively throughout the life cycle of a product, from its reception to its distribution. This is also referred to as the “value chain” or “activity chain”. These activities include the physical movement of finished products (handling, storage, and shipping) and the flow of information. The processes and activities identified are shown in Figure 7.

4.4. Relationship between the Most Used 4.0 Technologies in a Warehouse and the Different Functions of Each Process

Warehouse 4.0 takes as a starting point the digitalization, in other words, the integration of 4.0 technologies in the warehouse process. This new trend aims to use technologies such as AI, BD, and cobots; the question is about the effectiveness and usefulness of these technologies for the different stages of storage. To do this, Table 6 summarizes the relationship between the most used 4.0 technologies in a warehouse and the different functions of each process. This result represents a decision aid for the company to choose the technology or technologies suitable for each process. This detailed bibliographic study on the relationship of 4.0 technologies, with the different processes of the warehouse as well as the sustainable contribution of 4.0 technologies in the supply chain, has been presented [61].

4.5. Risk of Digital Transformation and Solutions Provided by New Technologies

During the process of implementing 4.0 technologies, change managers may be confronted with resistance from employees. It will also be necessary to involve a certain number of stakeholders, so the implementation of this novelty is accepted as easily as possible. The most important challenge during the digital transition has been organizational rather than technological. Before introducing these new technologies, I prepared and made employees aware, a few months in advance, of the changes that would occur. The people-centered approach significantly reduced the resistance to change from employees that I encountered during this process. A diagnosis was carried out at the level of employees, with 100 people out of the 300 employees, to discover their expectations of this digital transition project. The diagnosis conducted includes the following elements [62]:
-
Sustainable practices and actions;
-
Obstacles and brakes to digitalization.
These are the different key individual or collective factors leading to resistance to change. Among the reasons for resistance, as presented in Figure 8, I cite:
-
Integration of a new and complicated work tool;
-
Fear of losing work;
-
Fear of not being up to the task and of acquiring new skills;
-
Poor communication from management and within the company;
-
Increased workflow and strenuous work;
-
Loss of personal benefits;
-
Fear of losing social benefits;
-
Fear of migrating to a new job;
-
Motivation and commitment to the digital transition project;
-
Benefits received in return.
Before tackling a digital transition in a company, it is interesting to improve the human factor, to prepare them for the changes. Several authors have worked on this theme such as [63,64]; for this case, I have made a diagnosis that has the objective of learning the opinions of employees about this digitalization project for the warehouse.
In the questionnaire, the majority of employees declared that they were afraid to adhere to the digital transition project, which pushes the company to act and to establish communication links. The latter is one of the essential elements for the digital transition.
Communication has helped to share ideas and to encourage reflection on new ideas for the project, and it has allowed employees to have a better understanding of the project, so that they can adhere to it. This action explained the need for change by the company and identified the benefits for the individual and the whole company. Internal or external training is deemed necessary to help employees improve their digitalization skills and to motivate them to succeed in this project. In this way, the company acquires the human resources needed to overcome the obstacles of digital transformation. To remedy the majority of employees’ fears, the company has prioritized the implementation of human-dimension technologies to improve the working conditions. This is reflected in two actions:
-
The technologies developed have made it possible to improve the working conditions on the premises that is becoming connected. They provide optimal security. They manage spaces, obtain accurate data, and are able to make strategic decisions about the use of the work environment. They are intelligent tools for space management, which modify the light according to the time of day and the brightness for the maximum comfort and a reduction in energy consumption, program the temperature of the room according to its occupation and according to the seasons (heating, air conditioning, etc.), and to optimize the air diffusion according to the number of people present in the warehouse.
-
The availability of highly advanced handling technologies to eliminate tedious work such as stacker cranes, cobots, etc.
These applications aim to obtain a better management of the premises and also to have a positive influence on the working conditions, to reduce painful work, and to optimize the locations, the well-being, and the motivation of the employees.

4.6. Process Maturity Diagnostics

To do this, I follow the methodology developed earlier in Figure 4 to integrate 4.0 solutions. This step is based on a diagnosis using a questionnaire to calculate the degree of maturity of the different processes of the reception of the product to be bottled, the storage of the products in the warehouse, and then the preparation of orders and shipping, as shown in Table 7.
The diagnosis that I propose has as objective: to discover the existing as new technology and to propose a digitalization of the warehouse for a company. I have elaborated the questionnaire according to four axes; with this questionnaire (Table 6), it is possible to evaluate the overall maturity of the company for the choice of new technologies.
I present, in Figure 9, the result of the calculation of the current degree of maturity obtained by the diagnosis carried out using Equation (1). Following this diagnosis, an action plan is initiated.
The company has certain technologies such as ERP, management software, etc. According to Figure 9, it can be seen that the average digital maturity is less than 50%. The difficulties are mainly at the level of order preparation and shipping; hence, there is the need for an effort to be made by the company. Ie present, in Table 8, the problems identified for each process, their impact on the process, and the proposed solutions.

4.7. New Warehouse Design

Warehouses are important elements of the logistics industry, as their operational efficiency determines the operational efficiency of logistics [65]. The transition to Warehouse 4.0 not only solved the problems related to management but also guaranteed real-time warehouse control, eliminating unnecessary and repetitive tasks, reducing the number of accidents, and ensuring a response to customer requirements, by using the following technologies:
-
Connectivity 4.0 technology: IOT, augmented reality, RFID, and barcodes;
-
Data collection: WMS and ERP;
-
Data processing: AI.
In conclusion, this work presents a clear methodology to achieve the digital transformation of a warehouse by using the framework of sustainable development. The objective of this work in the form of the methodology presented in Figure 4 can facilitate the digital transition of the warehouse. This structured approach, composed of different steps, can be considered as a decision-support tool for logistics principals to implement the new technologies of Industry 4.0 in their warehouses.

Performance Indicators for the Digital Warehouse

The notion of performance has always been placed in an economic and financial perspective, where shareholder satisfaction was privileged. However, more and more research is associating other non-financial indicators with financial indicators. In fact, the objective is to conceive a multidimensional evaluation where the interests of all actors are now integrated for decision-makers and employees. Indeed, the impact of logical sustainable development is increasingly felt within companies. According to this strategy, companies must then reflect on the practice of economic, environmental, and social/societal indicators [66].
I address the problem of managing logistics activities in a warehouse within the framework of a corporate social responsibility (CSR) approach. I propose an integrated approach that allows to operationalize the evaluation of the performance according to economic, environmental, and social dimensions. The role of the indicators established is to inform managers and executives about the social and environmental impacts of the company’s activities on the one hand and about the quality of relations between the company and its stakeholders on the other hand. They are interested in a new form of performance, environmental or social, which can ultimately have significant impacts on the financial performance of the company [67].
For the monitoring of the different activities, indicators are established to measure the overall economic and financial sustainability, environmental, and societal indicators (see Table 9).

5. Evaluation of the Results Obtained and Discussion

The digital transition of warehouses, which takes into account sustainable development issues, has a very positive impact on warehouse performance.
The company prioritized some technologies to be implemented over others, starting with technologies that improve the well-being of employees. This was a very intelligent choice, to motivate and support the stakeholders to succeed in the company’s digital transition project. Secondly, technologies were implemented to improve process activities: software such as WMS to make processes more flexible and shorten delivery times, artificial intelligence to help with data analysis, the IoT to create a transparent and connected warehouse, and stacker cranes to make better use of warehouse space.
The before and after results measured by the three sustainability indicators are presented in Table 10.

6. Conclusions

The digitalization of warehouse operations through these new solutions is the most effective strategy to eliminate mistakes and optimize the performance of the warehouse. Industry 4.0 proposes ambitious solutions to meet the market requirements. This work has focused on Warehouse 4.0, explaining the usefulness of new technologies in the warehousing process. The methodology showed how to transfer a conventional warehouse to Warehouse 4.0, making it more efficient.
Through the case study and a diagnostic measurement of the degree of maturity in 4.0 technology, the choice of appropriate technologies has shown that these new tools allow a company to optimize the management of its warehouse at the level of each process and eliminate the related problems, which is justified by the difference between the calculation of the degree of maturity before and after the integration of technologies. This digital transition is presented from a sustainable development perspective. In this sense, the three dimensions (economic, environmental, and social) are taken into account from the start, which has facilitated the success of this project, in particular the clear improvement of the indicators.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Edouard, A.; Lamouri, S.; Fortineau, V.; Sallez, Y.; Berger, A. Utilisation des approches de l’industrie 4.0 et de l’internet physique pour le deploiement d’entrepots urbains. In Proceedings of the 13ème Conference Internationale de Modelisation, Optimisation et Simulation (MOSIM2020), Agadir, Morocco, 12–14 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mourdi, K. Farm Storage Management: Mapping, Modeling and Optimization; Laval University: Québec, QC, Canada, 2021; p. 130. [Google Scholar]
  3. Warehouse Vision Study; Zebra Technologies: Lincolnshire, IL, USA, 2019.
  4. Warehouse 4.0, the End of a Standard? CBRE: Paris, France, 2017.
  5. Rakyta, M.; Bubenik, P.; Binasova, V.; Micieta, B.; Staffenova, K. Advanced Logistics Strategy of a Company to Create Sustainable Development in the Industrial Area. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Derrouiche, R.; Lamouri, S. Numéro spécial: «Supply Chain 4.0». Logistique Manag. 2020, 28, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Djahara, R.; Sahnoun, M.; Bettayeb, B. Le parc logistique du futur, un acteur d’un développement. In Proceedings of the 27ème Colloque des Sciences de la Conception et de L’innovation (eCONFERE’20), Paris, France, 2 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. Rogetzer, P.; Nowak, T.; Jammernegg, W.; Wakolbinger, T. Impact de la numérisation sur les chaînes d’approvisionnement durables. In Dans Chancen und Grenzen der Nachhaltigkeitstransformation; Springer Gabler: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2019; pp. 131–144. [Google Scholar]
  9. Martins, F.D.C.; Simon, A.T.; de Campos, R.S. Supply Chain 4.0 challenges. Gest. Produção 2020, 27, 5427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yavas, V.; Ozkan-Ozen, Y.D. Logistics centers in the new industrial era: A proposed framework for logistics center 4.0. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020, 135, 101864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kucharavy, D.; Damand, D.; Chehbi-Gamoura, S.; Barth, M.; Mornay, S. Entrepôt du futur: Le concept de cartographie de contradictions. Logistique Manag. 2019, 28, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dusadeerungsikul, P.O.; Nof, S.Y. A Cyber Collaborative Protocol for Real-Time Communication and Control in Human-Robot-Sensor Work. Int. J. Comput. Commun. CONTROL 2021, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ivanov, D.; Dolgui, A. A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0. Prod. Plan. Control 2021, 32, 775–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Halawa, F.; Dauod, H.; Lee, I.G.; Li, Y.; Yoon, S.W.; Chung, S.H. Introduction of a real time location system to enhance the warehouse safety and operational efficiency. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hamet, P.; Tremblay, J. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metabolism 2017, 69, S36–S40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Silva, N.; Barros, J.; Santos, M.Y.; Costa, C.; Cortez, P.; Carvalho, M.S.; Gonçalves, J.N.C. Advancing Logistics 4.0 with the Implementation of a Big Data Warehouse: A Demonstration Case for the Automotive Industry. Electronics 2021, 10, 2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Radu, L.-D. Green Cloud Computing: A Literature Survey. Symmetry 2017, 9, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Durand, D.; Gnimpieba Zanfack, D.R.; Sidi Moh, A.N.; Fortin, J. Internet des objets et interopérabilité des flux logistiques: État de l’art et perspectives. In Proceedings of the 10èmes Journées Francophones Mobilité et Ubiquité, Sophia Antipolis, France, 5–6 June 2014. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kremer, S.; Mé, L.; Rémy, D.; Roca, V. Défis Actuels et Axes de Recherche à l’Inria; Inria Livre Blanc: Rennes, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. von Solms, R.; van Niekerk, J. From information security to cyber security. Comput. Secur. 2013, 38, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seemma, P.S.; Nandhini, S.; Sowmiya, M.M. Overview of Cyber Security. Overview of Cyber Security. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 2018, 7, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mikkola, A. Improving Supply Chain and Logistics and Reducing Costs by Design and Improvement of Packaging with the Help of Lean and DFL; nylio pisto, University of Vaasa: Vaasa, Finland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wu, B.; Chi, X.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, W.; Lu, Y.; Jiang, D. Dynamic Path Planning for Forklift AGV Based on Smoothing A* and Improved DWA Hybrid Algorithm. Sensors 2022, 22, 7079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ding, D.; Pan, Z.; Cuiuri, D.; Li, H. Wire-feed additive manufacturing of metal components: Technologies, developments and future interests. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 81, 465–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Akella, P.; Peshkin, M.; Colgate, E.; Wannasuphoprasit, W.; Nagesh, N.; Wells, J.; Holland, S.; Pearson, T.; Peacock, B. Cobots for the automobile assembly line. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C), Detroit, MI, USA, 10–15 February 1999; pp. 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sah, B.; Gupta, R.; Bani-Hani, D. Analysis of barriers to implement drone logistics. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2020, 24, 531–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Claverie, B.; Le Blanc, B.; Fouillat, P. La cobotique. Commun. Organ. 2013, 44, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bottani, E.; Vignali, G. Augmented reality technology in the manufacturing industry: A review of the last decade. IISE Trans. 2019, 51, 284–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Boulos, M.N.K.; Berry, G. Real-time locating systems (RTLS) in healthcare: A condensed primer. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2012, 11, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, S.; Brahma, S.; Mackay, J.; Cao, C.; Aliakbarian, B. The role of smart packaging system in food supply chain. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zhu, X.; Mukhopadhyay, S.K.; Kurata, H. A review of RFID technology and its managerial applications in different industries. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2012, 29, 152–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bouh, M.A. Sélection des Équipements de Manutention et D’entreposage; Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal University: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gupta, S.; Prathipati, B.; Dangayach, G.S.; Rao, P.N.; Jagtap, S. Development of a Structural Model for the Adoption of Industry 4.0 Enabled Sustainable Operations for Operational Excellence. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chardine-Baumann, E.; Botta-Genoulaz, V. Prise en considération des problématiques des chaînes logistiques durables dans les référentiels d’évaluation de performance. Logistique Manag. 2009, 17, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kayikci, Y. Sustainability impact of digitization in logistics. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 21, 782–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Luthra, S.; Mangla, S.K. Évaluer les défis des initiatives de l’industrie 4.0 pour la durabilité de la chaîne d’approvisionnement dans les économies émergentes. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 117, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bhat, R.; Jõudu, I. Emerging issues and challenges in agri-food supply chain. In Sustainable Food Supply Chains; University of Bologna: Bologna, Italy, 2019; pp. 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ait-Daoud, S. Le management Responsable des Technologies de l’Information (MRTI): Entre Approches Éthique et Institutionnelle. Ph.D. Thesis, Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  39. Saberi, S.; Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J.; Shen, L. Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 57, 2117–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bennouri, J.; Ouariti, O.P.Z. L’étude de l’impact des innovations technologiques digitales sur la performance durable d’une chaîne logistique: Cas du secteur halio-industriel. In Proceedings of the 13ème Conference Internationale De Modelisation, Optimisation et Simulation (MOSIM2020), Agadir, Morocco, 12–14 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  41. Swan, M. Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy; O’Reilly Media, Inc.: Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  42. Chapron, G. The environment needs cryptogovernance. Nature 2017, 545, 403–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Bhat, R. (Ed.) Sustainability Challenges in the Agrofood Sector; John Wiley & Sons: Bogor, Indonisia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  44. Davidsson, P.; Hajinasab, B.; Holmgren, J.; Jevinger; Persson, J. A. The Fourth Wave of Digitalization and Public Transport: Opportunities and Challenges. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dossou, P.-E. Impact of Sustainability on the supply chain 4.0 performance. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 17, 452–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. de Man, J.C.; Strandhagen, J.O. An Industry 4.0 research agenda for sustainable business models. Procedia CIRP 2017, 63, 721–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mercier-Laurent, E. Intelligence articielle 4.0 pour l’Industrie 4.0. In Bulletin de la Société Informatique de France; SIF: Paris, Farnce, 2020; pp. 127–137. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pale, T. La Robotique Collaborative. Promouvoir un Outil de Développement en Jugulant la Faiblesse des Infrastructures Physiques en Afrique. Communication, Technologies et DéVeloppement, 2020. Available online: https://journals.openedition.org/ctd/pdf/2628 (accessed on 28 March 2021).
  49. Li, J.; Tao, F.; Cheng, Y.; Zhao, L. Big data in product lifecycle management. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 81, 667–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ngai EW, T.; Peng, S.; Alexander, P.; Moon, K.K. Decision support and intelligent systems in the textile and apparel supply chain: An academic review of research articles. Expert Syst. Appl. 2014, 41, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kellens, K.; Mertens, R.; Paraskevas, D.; Dewulf, W.; Duflou, J.R. Environmental Impact of Additive Manufacturing Processes: Does AM contribute to a more sustainable way of part manufacturing? Procedia CIRP 2017, 61, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Weller, C.; Kleer, R.; Piller, F.T. Economic implications of 3D printing: Market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 164, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ben-Ner, A.; Siemsen, E. Decentralization and localization of production: The organizational and economic consequences of additive manufacturing (3D printing). Calif. Manag. Rev. 2017, 59, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hoummady, M.; Lemercier, P.; Boisard, A.S. Evolutions de la Logistique à L’horizon 2025: Enjeux et Impacts du Big Data, de L’Intelligence Artificielle et de la Robotisation, 2015. Available online: https://hal-brgm.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01860451/document (accessed on 29 March 2021).
  55. Rodić, I. Responsabilité Sociale des Entreprises—Le déVeloppement D’un Cadre Européen; European Institute, Geneve Universtiy: Geneve, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  56. Pacchini AP, T.; Lucato, W.C.; Facchini, F.; Mummolo, G. The degree of readiness for the implementation of Industry 4.0. Comput. Ind. 2019, 113, 103125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lin, T.C.; Wang, K.J.; Sheng, M.L. To assess smart manufacturing readiness by maturity model: A case study on Taiwan enterprises. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2020, 33, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mittal, S.; Khan, M.A.; Romero, D.; Wuest, T. A critical review of smart manufacturing & Industry 4.0 maturity models: Implications for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). J. Manuf. Syst. 2018, 49, 194–214. [Google Scholar]
  59. Schumacher, A.; Erol, S.; Sihn, W. A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises, 2016. Available online: https://publik.tuwien.ac.at/files/publik_255446.pdf (accessed on 8 April 2021).
  60. Hassani, A. Industry 4.0 and Key Project Success Factors; Quebec University: Quebec, QC, Canada, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  61. El Kihel, Y.; El Kihel, A.; Bouyahrouzi, E.M. Contribution of Maintenance 4.0 in Sustainable Development with an Industrial Case Study. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mhaezi, H. Sustainable Supply Chain in Morocco: State of Play, Motivations and Obstacles, Casablanca, Morocco, 2016. Available online: https://revues.imist.ma/index.php/MLS/article/view/6812/4084 (accessed on 8 April 2021).
  63. Foshay, N.; Mukherjee, A.; Taylor, A. Does data warehouse end user metadata add value? Commun. ACM 2007, 50, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Desmet, P.; Fokkinga, S. Beyond Maslow’s pyramid: Introducing a typology of thirteen basic needs for human-centered design. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2020, 4, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hong-Ying, S. The application of barcode technology in logistics and warehouse management. In Proceedings of the 2009 First International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, Wuhan, China, 7–8 March 2009; Volume 3, pp. 732–735. [Google Scholar]
  66. Tadesse, M.D.; Kine, H.Z.; Gebresenbet, G.; Tavasszy, L.; Ljungberg, D. Key Logistics Performance Indicators in Low-Income Countries: The Case of the Import–Export Chain in Ethiopia. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Preston, L.E.; O’bannon, D.P. The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Bus. Soc. 1997, 36, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Number of publications where ‘‘Smart Warehouse’’, ‘‘Warehouse 4.0’’, and ‘‘Logistics 4.0’’ appeared, from 2015 to 2021.
Figure 1. Number of publications where ‘‘Smart Warehouse’’, ‘‘Warehouse 4.0’’, and ‘‘Logistics 4.0’’ appeared, from 2015 to 2021.
Sustainability 14 15282 g001
Figure 2. Number of publications for each technology used in logistics from 2015 to 2021.
Figure 2. Number of publications for each technology used in logistics from 2015 to 2021.
Sustainability 14 15282 g002
Figure 3. Number of publications on warehouses and their link to sustainability from 2015 to 2021.
Figure 3. Number of publications on warehouses and their link to sustainability from 2015 to 2021.
Sustainability 14 15282 g003
Figure 5. Warehouse process.
Figure 5. Warehouse process.
Sustainability 14 15282 g005
Figure 6. Warehouse 4.0 technologies.
Figure 6. Warehouse 4.0 technologies.
Sustainability 14 15282 g006
Figure 7. The processes and different activities of the warehouse.
Figure 7. The processes and different activities of the warehouse.
Sustainability 14 15282 g007
Figure 8. Main reasons for resistance to change.
Figure 8. Main reasons for resistance to change.
Sustainability 14 15282 g008
Figure 9. Warehouse digital maturity gap (Em).
Figure 9. Warehouse digital maturity gap (Em).
Sustainability 14 15282 g009
Table 1. Definition of 4.0 technologies and their uses in the warehouse.
Table 1. Definition of 4.0 technologies and their uses in the warehouse.
TechnologiesDefinition
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
-
Uses digital to model intelligent behavior [15].
-
Assists in data analysis, generate repetitive commands, and aid in decision-making.
Big Data
-
Process massive amounts of data at high speeds.
-
Provide supply chain control with real-time data.
-
Control and manage inventory and improve forecasting models [16].
Cloud Computing
-
Provide dynamic computing capabilities.
-
Provides access to complex applications and data archiving, without requiring additional computing resources [17].
Internet of Things (IoT)
-
Refers to a variety of sensing equipment and information systems (RFID, barcode, M2M communication, etc.) [18].
-
Helps in the traceability of goods and inventory and increases speed and efficiency.
Cyber Security
-
Protects a computer or computer system from unauthorized access or attack [19]. For a company, it is important to protect the information collected from the supply chain [20].
Automatic Truck Loading System (ATLS)
-
Loads or unloads pallets, loose sheets, racks, or other types of unit loads [21].
Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV)
-
Able to navigate without human intervention.
-
Could be used as an alternative to the conveyor and cart [22].
Scan 3D
-
Analyzes objects or their close environment to collect precise information on the shape and possibly on the appearance (color, texture, etc.)
-
Facilitates quality control of goods and 3D modeling.
Additive Manufacturing
-
Helps with replenishment in a warehouse. Used for the manufacture of large, expensive metal components with complex geometry [23].
Cobots
-
Hybrid devices that allow direct, physical interaction with a human operator in shared workspaces.
-
Can assist in the transportation of goods and the preparation of orders [24].
Drone
-
Aircraft that can fly without a human pilot on board.
-
Have several vital applications such as inventory management and package deliveries [25].
Automated Robotic Arm
-
A system composed of mechanical parts, electrical components, and electronics that performs a set of specialized functions [26].
Augmented Reality
(AR)
-
Real-time visualization of the storage capacity of the warehouse and optimization of the available space according to the inventories made.
-
Identifies product location and characteristics through the use of connected glasses.
-
Reduces package identification time, choice of destination, and optimized route tracing, thanks to the reception of information necessary for the preparation of package routing [27].
Real Time Location System (RTLS)
-
Automatically identifies and tracks the location of objects or people in real time [28].
Smart Pack
-
Includes active and intelligent packaging.
-
Monitors internal and external changes in a product.
-
Communicates collected data with an external interface [29].
Radio-Identification (RFID)
-
Consists of a label and a reader connected to a computer system.
-
Collects data in real time via a tag and then transmits it by radio waves [30].
Stacker Crane
-
Carries out automatic storage of material.
-
Guided by management software that coordinates all movements [31,32].
Table 2. Contributions of sustainable development in logistics.
Table 2. Contributions of sustainable development in logistics.
SocialDigitalization facilitates consumer accessibility to products and information through online ordering and e-commerce. Thus, it has contributed to the improvement of people’s well-being as well as the community [8,35].
EnvironmentalThe application of Industry 4.0 has allowed for the optimization of energy consumption and the minimization of waste and losses [36]. Some authors have demonstrated that the selection of more suitable technologies such as robotics, digital sensors, and RFID tags has allowed for the design and manufacture of sustainable products and the achievement of higher production and increased food safety [36,37].
Digitization contributes positively to the preservation of the environment [38]. Technological systems such as the blockchain and RFID have made it possible to ensure the traceability of food products at all times, while still ensuring compliance with HACP rules. Responsible information technologies have made it possible to dematerialize and digitize customer procedures and to offer new services such as administration and payment. These new services make it possible to reduce paper consumption, facilitate interorganizational exchanges, and replace travel and transportation, which generate CO2 emissions [38].
EconomicDigitization has contributed to improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the production system [35]. The adoption of digitization technologies by a company and its supply chain affects its economic performance. Technologies such as blockchain can lead to disintermediation of the supply chain by reducing the number of intermediaries involved in the supply chain. This leads to reduced time and trade losses and the accessibility of the product at the lowest cost [39].
Table 3. The main positive sustainable impacts of digital technologies in a warehouse context.
Table 3. The main positive sustainable impacts of digital technologies in a warehouse context.
Technologies DSCDescriptionImpact on Sustainable DevelopmentAuthors
Economic ComponentSocial Component
Environmental Component
BlockchainA technology for storing and transmitting information, which is characterized by transparency and security of data and transactions.-Disintermediation of the supply chain
-Guarantee the security and authenticity of data.
-Ensure the transparency and reliability of the company.
-Reassure the consumer on the ethics of the products purchased.
-Strengthen food safety by reducing contamination problems through the digitization of tracking and storage of records and information
-Improve traceability and consumer confidence.
-Track the carbon footprint of products throughout the supply chain.
-Reduce the carbon emissions in the routing of the product by providing the basis for the mapping of the chain.
[8,37,39,41,42]
Sensor Technology and the Internet of ThingsSensor technology allow for the connection of objects and products, provided they are equipped with sensors and linked to software or GPS. -Ensure a better control of the products in the cold chain
-Traceability of the product throughout the supply chain.
- Make it easier for employees to detect products.
-Assurance for the safety of products.
- Detect defective batches in the case of agri-food contamination.
-Reduce the loss of resources and energy
[8,37,43,44]
CobotA new form of robotization that integrates the collaborative and interactive aspect of the relationship between a robot and a human being.- Optimization of resources and energy needs.
- Reuse obsolete product components in the manufacturing chain.
-Make it easier for employees to detect products.
-Assurance for the safety of products.
-Reduce the carbon footprint of the supply chain.
- Reduce storage costs through the just-in-time system.
-Increase production with a minimum of rejection.
[32,36,45,46,47,48]
Big Data and Cloud ComputingTechnology that designates a very large set of data that are stored and processed via Cloud Computing. In SCM, Big Data and the cloud have made it possible to exploit shared data and strengthen collaboration between the various actors involved in the chain.-Transformation of the tense flows in pushed flows, which participates in the reduction in the waste and increases the reactivity of the company.Product customization and consumer satisfaction.
-Reduce waste by predicting the lifespan of the parts and components of the product and specifying the recovery options in the supply chain.[8,48,49,50,51]
3D Printing and Additive ManufacturingIn additive manufacturing, 3D parts are added under computer control in a successive layer.-Optimize production time and accelerate delivery time to customers.
-Replace the lack of manpower suffered in some countries.
-Reduce the materials used in the products.
-Reduce the negative effect on the environment.
-Reduce the waste of energy.
[8,51,52,53]
AGVAn AGV moves goods autonomously. It is becoming an indispensable tool for industrial automation and flow management, because it is robust and adapted to heavy loads or long movements.-Limit the number of trips in the warehouse.
-Optimize the operators’ roles.
Risk component:
-Reduce the number of accidents.
-Reduce the rate of energy consumed.
-Reduce the number of damaged packages.
[22,31,32,48]
Augmented RealityAR is a concept that allows for the integration of virtual information into an environment. An AR system must respect three fundamental rules: combine the real and the virtual, interact in real time, and be recorded in three dimensions.-Facilitate the location of products.
-Reduce search time.
-Optimize picking operations.
Risk component:
-Limit worker travel.
-Reduce energy consumption.[15,27]
RFIDA technology that uses a radio frequency to exchange data between an antenna and an object to identify, locate, categorize, and track it.-Save time verifying the products.
Detect and follow up on goods until labeling.
-Replace the lack of
personnel.
-Increase conformity with the orders.
-Ensure the traceability of food products.
[30]
Stacker CraneA machine designed to store and retrieve pallets automatically.-Increase storage capacity.
-Exploit a warehouse’s height.
Risk component:
-Reduce the number of accidents
Conserve a city’s green spaces.[31,32]
Artificial IntelligenceAI indicates that machines learn autonomously and behave similarly to humans.Economic component:
-Model intelligent behavior.
-Manage and forecast repeat orders.
-Help in decision-making.
-Respond to customer needs.
-Manage the high demand of certain products.
Reduce energy consumption.[54]
Cyber SecurityCyber security systems are defined as digital systems that control the physical processes, not only in one direction but also linked to feedback loops with the system, while allowing for the real-time harmonization of information and physical flows.-Plan enterprise
resources.
-Manage customer relationships.
-Protect the company’s data and information.
-Use of the carbon footprint.[19,20]
Table 4. Maturity models found in the literature [56].
Table 4. Maturity models found in the literature [56].
Maturity and Readiness Models
ACATECH Maturity Index
The Singapore Smart Industry Readiness Index
IMPULS–Industrie 4.0 Readiness
DREAMY–Digital Readiness Assessment Maturity Approach
A maturity approach for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises.
SIMMI 4.0–A Maturity Approach for Classifying the Enterprise–wide IT and Software Landscape Focusing on Industry 4.0
Industry 4.0: Building the digital enterprise
Concept for an evolutionary maturity based Industrie 4.0 migration approach
Three stage maturity model in SME’s towards Industry 4.0
Table 5. The weighting factor and weighted average of the current status and target state.
Table 5. The weighting factor and weighted average of the current status and target state.
Current StatusTarget State
M Dli g Dli M Dli × g D l i M Dli g Dli M Dli × g D l i
Table 6. The contribution of technology to the warehouse process.
Table 6. The contribution of technology to the warehouse process.
Technologies IABDCloud CIoTCSATLSAGVScan 3DAMCOBOTSDRONESBAARRTLSSPRFIDStacker crane
Functions Sub-Functions
Receipt of goodsPlanning and information XXX X X X
Unloading and management of loading docks X XX X X
Quality control of goods received X
Labeling, consolidation, and addressing of goods X X X X
Storage of goodsSystem inventory XXXX X X
Document preparation XX X X
Stock control X X X
Replenishment X X X
Physical inventory X XX X
Putting in stock X XX XX
Preparation of ordersOrder picking planning XXX X
Picking route XX
Picking or picking X X XXX XX
Packaging and preparation of the order for shipment XXX X
ShippingPlanning of deliveries to be made XXX X
Consolidation and sorting of goods X X XXX
Document control and packaging XX X
Loading of goods X X X X
Table 7. Diagnostic questionnaire for the warehouse.
Table 7. Diagnostic questionnaire for the warehouse.
AxesQuestions
Receptions of goodsHow are the goods unloaded?
How is the conformity of the delivery checked?
How are the goods labeled and addressed?
How is the receiving area restored?
How is the information about the reception transmitted?
StorageHow is the storage space located?
How are documents prepared?
How are the goods labeled and addressed?
How is the receiving area restored?
How is receiving information transmitted?
Preparation of ordersWhat is used to pick the goods?
How is the picking route identified?
How is the picking schedule planned?
How are selection errors handled?
How are orders prepared and packed?
How are customer requests handled?
How are orders assigned to the picker?
ShippingHow are the trucks assigned?
How are the trucks loaded?
How are deliveries planned?
How are shipping documents prepared?
How are anomalies/alerts handled?
What control is exercised over product safety during transport operations?
Table 8. Detected warehouse problems and associated technologies.
Table 8. Detected warehouse problems and associated technologies.
Problems DetectedImpacts on Logistics ActivitySolution 4.0Expected Results
Unexploited space
-
Difficulty of storage, high season period (high production).
Stacker crane
-
Warehouse height storage
Mismanagement of stock
-
Delays in delivery time
WMS, augmented reality, RFID, AGV, AI
-
Automation and speed of stocking
-
Automatic distribution of the references of the locations
-
Location of products
-
Poor warehouse organization
-
Incorrect stocking
-
Sales forecast
Picking errors
-
Article picking errors
Augmented reality, RFID
-
Elimination of picking errors
-
Reduction in reverse logistics costs
-
Reduction in the rate of non-conforming orders
-
Order picking errors
-
Reverse logistics costs
-
Delayed shipments
Lack of traceability
-
Difficulty in locating batches
-
Delay in picking products
-
Lack of product information
IoT (RFID/RTLS),WMS
-
Ease of finding lot locations
-
Easy access to product details for customers and suppliers
-
Optimization of product traceability
Obsolete Inventory
-
Addressing errors
RFID, WMS, IA
-
The deployment of a warehouse management software
-
Breakage of stock
Loading and unloading problems
-
Long platform of trucks waiting to be loaded/unloaded
RTLS
-
Automation of the truck loading/unloading process
-
Reduction in storage time
Table 9. CSR Performance Indicators.
Table 9. CSR Performance Indicators.
EnvironmentalEconomicSocietal
Indicators
-
Number of kg of plastic waste
-
Co2 rate measured in the warehouse
-
Energy consumed
-
Rate of freed space
-
Service rate
-
Reduced sales due to stockout situations
-
Picking efficiency rate
-
Traceability control
-
Number of obsolete products (due to falls, accidents, etc.)
-
Loading and unloading time
-
Absenteeism rate
-
Number of accidents
-
Satisfaction rate
-
Social conflicts
-
Training rate
Table 10. Results obtained.
Table 10. Results obtained.
PerformanceInterpretationEvolution of Indicators
EconomicAll economic indicators are improved, and digital technologies help the warehouse to become more efficient:
-
Improve sales and customer relationships
-
Reduce business costs and their management
-
Increase the competitiveness of the warehouse and simplify daily tasks to gain efficiency and responsiveness
-
Free up space in the warehouse;
-
Improved service rate
-
Improved loading and unloading time thanks to robots and easier routing of parcels to the shipping docks with AGVs
-
Reduced number of obsolete products (due to falls, accidents, etc.)
-
Control of traceability, using RFID tags, to facilitate and automate the management of the warehouse
-
Picking efficiency rate
-
Control of sales forecasts thanks to AI
Sustainability 14 15282 i001
EnvironmentalIntegration of new technologies to limit the environmental impact of the warehouse:
-
Reduced CO2 emissions with the use of autonomous electric vehicles in the warehouse
-
Reduced noise pollution with silent motors for electric handling
-
Reduced plastic waste with less dropping and less shocking of transported pallets containing beverage bottles
-
Optimized energy costs by controlling temperatures in the warehouse and remote management of lighting according to occupancy hours
-
With electric handling, eliminated polluting products such as oil, grease, etc.
Sustainability 14 15282 i002
SocialIntegration of new handling technologies:
-
Eliminated tiring and repetitive work; hence, reduced absenteeism
-
Decreased number of accidents and conflicts, with increased training and employee satisfaction rates, which translates into the preservation of the environment and the well-being of people
-
In terms of risk, with the new technology, the company anticipates stoppages and intervenes quickly
-
Decrease in the number of accidents
-
Digitalization also contributed to facilitate the tasks and work of employees and ensure better safety and ergonomics in the workplace, with few social conflicts
Sustainability 14 15282 i003
Sustainability 14 15282 i004 Before integration of new technologies. Sustainability 14 15282 i005 After integration of new technologies.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kihel, Y.E. Digital Transition Methodology of a Warehouse in the Concept of Sustainable Development with an Industrial Case Study. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215282

AMA Style

Kihel YE. Digital Transition Methodology of a Warehouse in the Concept of Sustainable Development with an Industrial Case Study. Sustainability. 2022; 14(22):15282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215282

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kihel, Yousra El. 2022. "Digital Transition Methodology of a Warehouse in the Concept of Sustainable Development with an Industrial Case Study" Sustainability 14, no. 22: 15282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215282

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop