Next Article in Journal
Effects of Salinity and Dissolved Oxygen Concentration on the Tail-Flip Speed and Physiologic Response of Whiteleg Shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei
Previous Article in Journal
Subsidy Accountability and Biodiversity Loss Drivers: Following the Money in the Chilean Silvoagricultural Sector
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Influence of the Transition to Ecological Farming on the Quality of Runoff Water

by
Marek Trenčiansky
1,
Martina Štěrbová
1,2 and
Jozef Výbošťok
1,*
1
Department of Forest Economics and Management, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 24, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia
2
National Forest Centre—Forest Research Institute Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 2175/22, 960 92 Zvolen, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(22), 15412; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215412
Submission received: 21 October 2022 / Revised: 12 November 2022 / Accepted: 17 November 2022 / Published: 19 November 2022

Abstract

:
The aim of the paper is to analyze and evaluate the long-term impacts of the transition from agricultural production to ecological farming on the quality of runoff water in small catchments based on the analysis of water samples in the period 1986–2022. A total of 111 samples were analyzed. The following parameters were determined: nitrites, nitrates, chlorides, sulphates, phosphates, iron, coliform bacteria, and pH. Until 2006, the catchment was intensively managed by using artificial fertilizers and chemical preservatives. Since 2006, the catchment has been managed exclusively in an ecological way without the use of fertilizers and chemicals. The results of the analysis confirmed the positive impact of the transition of agricultural production to ecological farming, especially in the parameters of nitrates and chlorides. The greater use of organic fertilizers has caused an increase in coliform bacteria in the runoff water. The long period of the research also caused it to be possible to assess the impact of other potential factors. Changes in pH parameters and sulphates indicate an improvement in air quality. Changes in nitrite and iron parameters may indicate climate change associated with more intense precipitation activity.

1. Introduction

Water is a basic commodity and a condition of life. The importance of water as a raw material is growing because of increasing water scarcity and decreasing water quality. In the Slovak Republic, underground sources (82.2%) and surface sources (17.8%) are used for drinking water abstraction. In the literature [1,2], a term “water quality” defines the combination of physical, chemical, and biological properties of water.
Although, a number of key drivers, such as geological weathering, hydrologic and geomorphic processes, climate conditions, plant and environmental factors, and physiochemical and biological processes influence water quality [3,4], it can be stated that, within the regulating stream water quality, land use and the composition of land cover (LULC) within a watershed plays a significant role [5,6,7,8,9]. Landscape elements have been identified as the most important parameter affecting water quality through their impact on non-point source pollution resulting from complex run-off and landscape interactions [10,11,12,13,14].
Considering runoff from catchment areas into water bodies as the main source of nutrients and pollutants [15], the attention to the relationship between water quality and changes of land use has raised [16]. The conversion of native vegetation to agriculture and human settlements has significantly increased the human well-being at the expense of the degradation of many ecosystem services and biodiversity [17,18]. Agriculture and urbanization degrade the quality of water in water bodies through the production of damaging nutrients and xenobiotics. On the other hand, woodlands and wetlands work as sinks of non-point-source pollution [19]. Johnson et al. (1997) [20] pointed out that nutrient and sediment inputs to a basin are positively correlated with the percentage of agriculture and urban cover types. On the contrary, for example, forests generate lower runoff coefficients [21,22] and contribute to protecting the land, tending to favor infiltration and reducing rapid flow at the surface.
The aim of this study is to analyze and evaluate the long-term impacts of the transition of agricultural production to ecological farming on the quality of runoff water in a small catchment based on the analysis of water samples in the period 1986–2022.
Ecological farming is an environmentally friendly system that aims at a sustainable agro-ecosystem that uses primarily local and renewable resources and environmentally friendly technologies and practices that minimize environmental damage. It uses fertilizers of organic origin such as compost manure, green manure, and bone meal and places emphasis on techniques such as crop rotation and companion planting. By respecting the natural possibilities of plants, animals, and ecosystems, the conditions for quality in all aspects of agriculture and the environment are optimized. Ecological farming dramatically reduces the residual load coming from the use of chemical-synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and pharmaceuticals. In addition, in cooperation with natural laws, it makes it possible to simultaneously increase soil fertility and resistance to diseases and pests.
The work follows the long-term research carried out in the years 1986–1994 [23] and in the years 2009–2012 [24]. This is a total period of 36 years. During this time, there was a change in the way how agricultural production is managed in the analyzed catchment. Until 2006, the catchment was intensively managed by using artificial fertilizers and chemical preservatives. Since 2006, the catchment has been managed exclusively in a way of ecological farming without the use of fertilizers and chemicals (internal materials of the “Látky” agricultural farm, annual reports of used fertilizers, and chemical preservatives). At the same time, in the 1990s, agricultural production was reduced by approximately half (Internal materials of the “Látky” agricultural farm, annual reports–indicators of animal and plant production) and the catchment was overgrown with trees and shrubs. The length of the analyzed period also allows for the assessment, based on the change in the quality parameters of the runoff water, of the modification related to the change in air quality, as well as the possible consequences of climate change. Taking this into consideration, three research questions were defined:
  • RQ1: Which qualitative parameters of water were affected after the transition to ecological farming in the catchment?
  • RQ2: Which qualitative parameters were affected by other ongoing changes during the analyzed period?
  • RQ3: How is the quantitative extent that the qualitative parameters of water have been affected by these changes?
The basic structure of the paper includes Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. The introduction deals with the issue of the water quality and ecological farming. Methodologically, it is based on the “Mann–Kendall trend test” and “Mann–Whitney U test” to analyze the influence of land use on the content of individual water parameters. According to the statistical analysis, the Section 3 defines water parameters that have been affected by the transition to ecological farming, parameters affected by other factors, and those without changes. Subsequently, the paper discusses the results achieved with similar scientific works. The conclusion part states if the transition to ecological farming improves water quality indicators.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

The authors examined the chemical characteristics of surface runoff in a small catchment in Central Slovakia in the mountains Slovenské rudohorie. The catchment has an area 1.44 km2 and consisted of meadow (70%) and arable land (30%). The catchments is located at an average elevation of 850 m above sea level; the average annual rainfall is 920 mm and average annual temperature 5 °C. The geological subsoil of the catchment consists of granodiorites and the soil is unsaturated brown soil. The total humus levels reach from 225 to 250 t·ha−1; the humus form is moderate. The total nitrogen supply in upper soil horizon is from 6.0 to 6.5 t·ha−1. Most parts of the catchment have a slope of up to 30%. The average annual water flow was 31 l·s−1.
The sampling plot for the catchment is marked with a red point in Figure 1.
Most of the catchment area is managed by the Farm Cooperative, Látky. It currently manages about 1500 ha of land, of which about 100 ha are arable land. The predominant part of the cultivated area is meadows and pastures. The cooperative is focused on animal production and the production of bulk feed. Rye, wheat, oats, and potatoes are grown on arable land. The catchment area falls under a third degree protection zone of water source because of the Málinec Reservoir. For this reason, since 2006, the cooperative has moved to ecological farming with a total ban on the use of fertilizers and chemicals (internal materials of the “Látky” agricultural farm). At the beginning of the experiment, in 1986, this catchment was used for intensive animal and crop production, with the use of fertilizers and chemical preservatives (internal materials of the “Látky” agricultural farm, annual reports of used fertilizers and chemical preservatives). At that time, the cooperative managed twice as much area (approximately 3000 ha) as it does nowadays. In the 1990s, there was a gradual decrease in agricultural production. The number of farmed animals decreased (sheep from 3000 to 1800, cattle from 3000 to 150) and some unused arable land was turned into meadows and some parts became overgrown with shrub species (internal materials of the “Látky” agricultural farm, annual reports—indicators of animal and plant production). Until 2006, the quality of runoff water was affected by the use of artificial fertilizers as well as chemical preservatives. In our case, in the 1980s, an agricultural land manager used an average of 500 tons of fertilizer per year, which is almost 0.2 tons per ha. The proportion of nitrogen in fertilizers was almost 90 kg·ha−1, the proportion of phosporus 70 kg·ha−1, and the proportion of potassium 40 kg·ha−1. The following types of fertilizers were most often used: NPK-gold, ammonium sulphate, potassium sulphate, superphosphate, saltpetre, and ammonium nitrate (internal materials of the “Látky” agricultural farm, annual reports of used fertilizers). In addition to artificial fertilizers, the spraying with herbicides, fungicides, and insecticides was carried out every year in an average volume of about 10 L·ha−1. These were the following preparations: Aminex, Retacel, Gramaxone, Topogard, Vaztak, Ridomil, Ladob, Decention, Santofan, Cymbush, Basagran, Metaxyl, and Harmavid (internal materials of the “Látky” agricultural farm, annual reports of used and chemical preservatives). With the decrease in cultivated land in the 1990s, the volume of used fertilizers and protective chemical preparations decreased continuously until 2006. At present, manure is used for fertilization in the volume of about 20 t·ha−1·year−1. Chemical preservatives are not used at all (internal materials of the “Látky” agricultural farm, annual reports of used fertilizers and chemical preservatives).

2.2. Sample Collection

The water samples were collected in the following periods: 1986–1990, 1992–1994, 2009–2012, and 2019–2022. We analyze the analyzed samples in time into two groups. The first group represent samples extracted before the transition to ecological farming (53 samples analyzed in 1986–1994) and the second group constitutes samples extracted after the transition to ecological farming (59 samples analyzed in 2009–2022). A total of 112 samples were analyzed. The following parameters were determined: nitrites, nitrates, chlorides, sulphates, phosphates, iron (all in mg·L−1), coliform bacteria (CFU·100 mL−1, CFU–Colony Forming Units), and pH. The numbers of samples extracted in each year are shown in Table 1. The samples were always extracted once a month from the exact same place at approximately 1.5 km from the source of the streams. For the purposes of sampling, a dam was built in catchment in 1986. The samples were extracted into sterilized containers—sample boxes according to the instructions of the laboratory from a depth of 5 to 10 cm below the surface of the stream. After sampling, the sample boxes were transported in the refrigerator to the laboratory. The water analyses from the first group (1986–1994) were carried out by the Technical University in Zvolen, while the water analyses from the second group (2009–2022) were performed by Stredoslovenská vodárenská spoločnosť (Central Slovak Water Company).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

From the point of view of processing statistical analyses, the authors divided the analyzed period into the first (1986–1994) and second (2009–2022) experimental period. All statistical analyses were conducted in accordance with statistical methods in water resources [25]. We tested the influence of land use on the content of individual elements using the Mann–Whitney U test. To test the development of the content of elements in water at time we used Mann–Kendall Trend Test.

3. Results

Based on the results of the statistical analysis (Table 1 and Table 2), the monitored characteristics were divided into three groups in the long run: parameters affected by the transition to ecological farming, parameters affected by other factors and parameters without changes.

3.1. Parameters Influenced by the Transition to Ecological Farming

A significant change in the average values of the parameters between the two analyzed periods, a change in the trend and the potential influence of fertilizers and pesticides indicate three parameters that were affected by the transition to ecological farming. From the analyzed parameters, they are: nitrates, chlorides, and coliform bacteria (Table 2, Figure 2). The differences in the data before and after transition to ecological farming are also confirmed by the results of the Mann–Whitney U test (Table 3).

3.2. Parameters Influenced by Other Potential Factors

The parameters that are influenced by other potential factors include the pH of the runoff water and the content of sulphates, nitrites, and iron (Figure 3).
The pH parameters of the runoff water and the sulphate content indicate trends in the impact of air pollution by sulphur oxides. The changes in the parameters of nitrates and iron point to climate change (washout with more frequent occurrence of intense precipitation).

3.3. Parameters without Changes

Among the parameters that are without confirmed statistical changes (Table 2 and Table 3) are phosphates (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

Before the transition to ecological farming, the average value of nitrates in the runoff water in the catchment reached 11.4 mg·L−1, after the transition to ecological farming there was a marked almost threefold decrease. For example, China [26], Brazil [27], and Spain [28] also report a high influence of agricultural land on nitrogen. For chlorides, the decrease in the average value is more than sixfold (before: 15.32 mg·L−1, after: 2.42 mg·L−1). Before the transition to ecological farming, a significant upward trend was confirmed for nitrates, after the transition to ecological farming, a slightly upward trend for nitrates and a slightly declining trend for chlorides was confirmed (Figure 2, Table 2). The significant difference in values and the change in the trend for nitrates and chlorides was caused by the ban on artificial fertilizer and pesticide use in the agricultural management of the catchment. The use of pesticides has been found to be a greater danger to the environment than any other pollution of soil, air, and water by industrial civilization. This means that current forms of agricultural intensification are potentially the greatest danger for the future healthy development of humankind [29]. Artificial fertilizers were replaced by organic fertilizers, which was reflected in the increased content of coliform bacteria (average value before: 92 CFU·100 mL−1, after: 837 CFU·100 mL−1) and also on the change of the trend; where the trend was not confirmed before and after the transition to ecological farming, we can talk about the rising trend (Figure 2, Table 2). The increased proportion of coliform bacteria may also be associated with the use of several buildings for seasonal housing in the catchment in connection with the discharge of wastewater. Another possible cause is the growth and decomposition of the organic matter of the riparian vegetation, which arose after the transition to ecological farming around the stream.
The long-term effect of the acidic disposition caused by industrial emissions, especially in the 1980s, resulted in a “limit load on land” [23]. This load increased the acidity of the run-off water during the first period (from 1986 to 1994). In the 1990s, industrial production was reduced, which significantly reduced sulphur oxides in the atmosphere. In the 1990s, annual SO2 emissions in the Slovak Republic exceeded 500,000 tons. In the 1990s, a gradual decline began, and in the second period (from 2009 to 2022), SO2 emissions were at the average level of 50,000 tons per year, representing a 10-fold decrease [30,31]. While the average pH value of the runoff water in the period before the transition to ecological farming was 6.7 and no trend was statistically confirmed at the sulphate content (1986–1994), in the years 2009–2022 the average pH value of the runoff water is at the level of 7.3 and the sulphate content has a decreasing trend (Table 2, Figure 3).
The average value of nitrite in the period before the transition to ecological farming was 0.010 mg·L−1, after the transition 0.016 mg·L−1. The growing trend was confirmed in both periods. The relatively high variability of this parameter indicates the leaching of nitrite into the runoff during precipitation activity. The rising trend, as well as the higher average value in the years 2009–2022, may indicate a more frequent occurrence of intense heavy rainfall in connection with climate change. Global climate change increases the rate of atmospheric precipitation [32]. At the same time, changes in this parameter in connection with the use of artificial and organic fertilizers in agriculture cannot be excluded.
The average value of iron content in runoff water in the period before the transition to ecological farming was at the level of 0.062, mg·L−1, after the transition 0.22 mg·L−1. Despite the higher average value, a slightly declining trend was confirmed in the period after the transition. Iron enters the surface runoff from the soil and geological bedrock or by import with a dissolved organic substance. A higher average value, similar to nitrite, may be related to more intense precipitation activity.
From the analyzed parameters, there were no changes in phosphate between the two investigated periods. The average value before the transition to ecological farming was 0.076 mg·L−1 and after the transition 0.083 mg·L−1. In the period before the transition to ecological farming, a slight growing trend was confirmed, in the period after the transition, this trend was not confirmed.
Overall, it can be stated that the transition to ecological farming, with the exception of coliform bacteria, has improved water quality parameters. The intensive using of pesticides and fertilizers has had a significant impact on water quality. [33,34,35,36].

5. Conclusions

Based on the results of long-term research, which covers a period of 36 years, we identified and quantified the parameters of runoff water, which were affected by the transition to ecological farming. A total of eight water parameters were analyzed: pH, sulphates, nitrates, nitrites, chlorides, phosphates, iron, and coliform bacteria.
The transition to ecological farming combined with the exclusion of fertilizers and chemical preservatives has significantly affected the proportion of nitrates and chlorides in the runoff water from the catchment. The decrease was more than sixfold for chlorides and almost threefold for nitrates. Organic fertilizers have become a substitute for the use of artificial fertilizers. Their use in combination with the higher volume of decomposing mass of the riparian vegetation and possible fecal pollution from several buildings used for occasional housing caused a significant increase in coliform bacteria in the runoff.
The longevity of the research caused it to be possible to assess, in addition to the transition to ecological farming, the assessment of the impact of other factors on the quality of runoff water. The change in average values and trends in the parameters of pH and sulphates indicates an improvement in air quality in relation to sulphur oxide emissions. The higher variability, as well as a slight increase in the average values for the parameters nitrite and iron, indicate their increased leaching from organic matter caused by more abundant precipitation activity. Heavy rainfall is one of the manifestations of a climate change. Phosphates represent factors for which there were no long-term changes in the analyzed catchment.
Six from the overall eight analyzed parameters in runoff water from the catchment, met the requirements for drinking water. Overall, we can state that the transition to ecological farming has improved water quality indicators.

Author Contributions

M.T. collected data prepared Materials and Method and Results parts of the study. J.V. analyzed and visualized the data. The introduction section was written by M.Š. All authors contributed to Discussion and Conclusion sections. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Scientific Grand Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research, and Sport of the Slovak Republic within the framework of Grant project “VEGA 1/0665/20 InnoWaFor: Innovation potential of payments for ecosystem services—Water and Forests” (40%). The Slovak Research and Development Agency supported the study under research projects “APVV-18-0347 Climate change and natural hazards impacts: adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of Western Carpatians forest ecosystems” (40%), “APVV-18-0520 Innovative analyzing methods of performance the forestry-wood processing complex with using the principles of green growth” (15%) and “APVV-19-0612 Modelling the detrimental natural hazards occurrence risk impact on the economic complex forestry - wood processing under conditions of the ongoing climate change” (5%).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baillie, B.R.; Neary, D.G. Water quality in New Zealand´s planted forests: A review. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 2015, 45, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Carr, G.M.; Neary, J.P. Water Quality for Ecosystem and Human Health, 2nd ed.; United Nations Environment Programme/Earthprint: Ontario, ON, Canada, 2008; 130p. [Google Scholar]
  3. Binkley, D.; Burnham, H.; Allen, L.H. Water quality impacts of forest fertilization with nitrogen and phosphorus. For. Ecol. Manag. 1999, 121, 191–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brown, T.C.; Binkley, D. Effect of Management on Water Quality in North American Forests; USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-248; Colorado State University: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. O’Neill, R.V.; Hunsaker, C.T.; Jones, K.B.; Riitters, K.H.; Wickham, J.D.; Schwartz, P.M.; Goodman, I.A.; Jackson, B.L.; Baillargeon, W.S. Monitoring environmental quality at the landscape scale: Using landscape indicators to assess biotic diversity, watershed integrity and landscape stability. BioScience 1997, 47, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gleick, P.H. Water in Crisis: A Guide to the World’s Fresh Water Resources; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1993; 504p. [Google Scholar]
  7. Feller, M.C. Forest Harvesting and streamwater inorganic chemistry in western North America: A review. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2005, 41, 785–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chauhan, A.; Verma, S. Impact of Agriculture, Urban and Forest Land Use on Physico-Chemical Properties of Water a Review. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2015, 4, 18–22. [Google Scholar]
  9. Giri, S.; Qiu, Z. Understanding the relationship of land uses and water quality in Twenty First Century: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 173, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Gergel, S.E. Spatial and non-spatial factors: When do they affect landscape indicators of watershed loading? Landsc. Ecol. 2005, 20, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Griffith, J.A.; Martinko, E.A.; Whistler, J.L.; Price, K.P. Preliminary comparison of landscape pattern-normalizqed difference vegetation index (NDVI) relationships to central plains stream conditions. J. Environ. Qual. 2002, 31, 846–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Moreno-Mateos, D.; Mander, U.; Comin, F.A.; Pedrocchi, C.; Uuemaa, E. Relationships between landscape pattern, wetland characteristic, and water quality in agricultural catchments. J. Environ. Qual. 2008, 37, 2170–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Snyder, M.N.; Goetz, S.J.; Wright, R.K. Stream health rankings predicted by satellite derived land cover metrics. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2005, 41, 659–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Uuemaa, E.; Roosaaree, J.; Mander, U. Landscape metrics as indicators of river water quality at catchment scale. Nord. Hydrol. 2007, 38, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tong, S.T.Y.; Chen, W. Modelling the relationship between land use and surface water quality. J. Environ. Manag. 2002, 66, 377–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xiao, R.; Wang, G.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Z. Multi-scale analysis of relationship between landscape pattern and urban river water quality in different seasons. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Foley, J.A.; DeFries, R.; Asner, G.P.; Barford, C.; Bonan, G.; Carpenter, S.R.; Chapin, F.S.; Coe, M.T.; Daily, G.C.; Gibbs, H.K.; et al. Global consequences of land use. Science 2005, 309, 570–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Assessment, M.E. Ecosystem and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; 100p. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bennett, E.M.; Carpenter, S.R.; Caraco, N.F. Human impact on erodible phosphorus and eutrophication: A global perspective: Increasing accumulation of phosphorus in soil threatens rivers, lakes, and coastal oceans with eutrophication. AIBS Bull. 2001, 51, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Johnson, L.; Richards, C.; Host, G.; Arthur, J. Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystems. Freshw. Biol. 1997, 37, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Adhikari, R.N.; Rao, M.S.R.M.; Selvi, V.; Math, S.K.N.; Husenappa, V.; Chandrappa, M.; Reddy, K.K. Studies on runoff coefficient of rational formula. Indian J. Soil Conserv. 2002, 30, 106–108. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sikka, A.K.; Selvi, V. Experimental examination of rational runoff coefficient for small agricultural and forest watersheds in the Nilgirs. IE J. 2005, 86, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
  23. Stachera, J.; Lalkovič, M. Vplyv lesnatosti povodia na chemizmus odtekajúcej vody (Influence of foresteed catchment area on runoff water chemistry). For. J. 2000, 46, 187–201. (In Sovak) [Google Scholar]
  24. Trenčiansky, M.; Štěrbová, M.; Výbošťok, J.; Lieskovský, M. Impacts of Forest Cover on Surface Runoff Quality in Small Catchments. BioResources 2021, 16, 7830–7845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Helsel, D.R.; Hirsch, R.M. Statistical Methods in Water Resources; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992; Volume 49, 529p. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen, Q.; Mei, K.; Dahlgren, R.A.; Wang, T.; Gong, J.; Zhang, M. Impacts of land use and population density on seasonal surface water quality using a modified geographically weighted regression. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 572, 450–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. DeOliveira, L.M.; Maillard, P.; de Andrade Pinto, É.J. Modelling the effect of land use/land cover on nitrogen, phosphorous and dissolved oxygen loads in the Velhas River using the concept of exclusive contribution area. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Álvarez-Cabria, M.; Barquín, J.; Peñas, F.J. Modelling the spatial and seasonal variability of water quality for entire river networks: Relationships with natural and anthropogenic factors. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 545/546, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Frankovská, J.; Slaninka, I.; Kordík, J.; Jurkovič, L.; Greif, V.; Šottník, P.; Dananaj, I.; Mikita, S.; Dercová, K.; Jánová, V. Atlas Sanačných Metód Environmentálnych Záťaží; Štátny Geologický Ústav Dionýza Štúra: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2010; 360p. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic and Slovak Environment Agency. State of the Environment Report of the Slovak Republic 1999; Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic and Slovak Environment Agency: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1999; 19p.
  31. Environment of the SR (Selected Indicators in 2014–2018; Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2019; 4p.
  32. Pecho, J.; Markovič, L.; Faško, P.; Madara, M. Výdatnosť Atmosférických Zrážok na Slovensku sa Zvyšuje (The Yield of Atmospheric Precipitation in Slovakia is Increasing); Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2018; Available online: http://www.shmu.sk/sk/?page=2049&id=932 (accessed on 10 March 2020).
  33. Stoate, C.; Boatman, N.D.; Borralho, R.J.; Carvalho, C.R.; Sno, G.R.; de Eden, P. Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J. Environ. Manag. 2001, 63, 337–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Allan, J.D. Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2004, 35, 257–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Herringshaw, D.; Johnson, R.K.; Kramm, S.; Schmutz, S.; Szoszkiewicz, K.; Verdonschot, P.F.M. Assessment of European streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish: A comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress. Freshw. Biol. 2006, 51, 1757–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mahler, R.L.; Barber, M.E. Using benthic macro invertebrates to assess water quality in 15 watersheds in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plann. 2017, 12, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Aerial photograph of the study site. The red point represents study area, the red asterisk represents the sampling plot for the analyzed catchment (own study).
Figure 1. Aerial photograph of the study site. The red point represents study area, the red asterisk represents the sampling plot for the analyzed catchment (own study).
Sustainability 14 15412 g001
Figure 2. Linear regression analysis for water parameters influenced by the transition to ecological farming. The contents of water parameters of the surface runoff (a) Nitrates, (b) Chlorides, (c) Coliform Bacteria.
Figure 2. Linear regression analysis for water parameters influenced by the transition to ecological farming. The contents of water parameters of the surface runoff (a) Nitrates, (b) Chlorides, (c) Coliform Bacteria.
Sustainability 14 15412 g002
Figure 3. Linear regression analysis for water parameters influenced by other potential factors. The contents of water parameters of the surface runoff (a) pH, (b) Sulphate, (c) Nitrite, (d) Iron.
Figure 3. Linear regression analysis for water parameters influenced by other potential factors. The contents of water parameters of the surface runoff (a) pH, (b) Sulphate, (c) Nitrite, (d) Iron.
Sustainability 14 15412 g003
Figure 4. Linear regression analysis for water parameters without changes. The contents of water parameters of the surface runoff—Phosphate.
Figure 4. Linear regression analysis for water parameters without changes. The contents of water parameters of the surface runoff—Phosphate.
Sustainability 14 15412 g004
Table 1. Number of samples extracted each year for water analysis.
Table 1. Number of samples extracted each year for water analysis.
Year198619871988198919901992
Number of samples8911941
Year199319942009201020112012
Number of samples92791212
Year2019202020212022
Number of samples21151
Table 2. Average values of parameters and Mann–Kendall trend test in the period before and after the transition to ecological farming.
Table 2. Average values of parameters and Mann–Kendall trend test in the period before and after the transition to ecological farming.
ParameterAverage
(mg·L−1, CFU·100 mL−1)
MK-Stats.e.z-Statp-ValueTrend
Before the transition to ecological farming pH6.729−30125.0253−0.2320.817no
phosphate0.076400129.4303.0830.002yes
sulphate12.750113123.0540.9100.363no
nitrates11.418401130.3193.0690.002yes
chlorides15.31815112.4500.1250.901no
iron0.062−226129.980−1.7310.083no
nitrite0.01032882.5313.9620.000yes
coliform92−6186.393−0.6950.487no
After the transition to ecological farmingpH7.328−39148.964−0.2550.799no
phosphate0.083223134.7921.6470.100no
sulphate13.747−497149.040−3.3280.001yes
nitrates3.862329149.0402.2010.028yes
chlorides2.416−342148.829−2.2910.022yes
iron0.220−344148.912−2.3030.021yes
nitrite0.016627148.8164.2070.000yes
coliform837845148.9495.6660.000yes
Table 3. Mann–Whitney U test results.
Table 3. Mann–Whitney U test results.
Parameterp Value
pH0.000
phosphate0.516
sulphate0.205
nitrates0.000
chlorides0.000
iron0.000
nitrite0.001
coliform0.000
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Trenčiansky, M.; Štěrbová, M.; Výbošťok, J. The Influence of the Transition to Ecological Farming on the Quality of Runoff Water. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215412

AMA Style

Trenčiansky M, Štěrbová M, Výbošťok J. The Influence of the Transition to Ecological Farming on the Quality of Runoff Water. Sustainability. 2022; 14(22):15412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215412

Chicago/Turabian Style

Trenčiansky, Marek, Martina Štěrbová, and Jozef Výbošťok. 2022. "The Influence of the Transition to Ecological Farming on the Quality of Runoff Water" Sustainability 14, no. 22: 15412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215412

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop