Exploring the Co-Creation of Small and Medium Enterprises, and Service Providers Enabled by Digital Interactive Platforms for Internationalization: A Case Study in Malaysia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. SMEs Food and Beverages (F&B) Manufacturing and Sustainability Initiatives
- Manufacturing, manufacturing-related services and agribusiness enterprises fall into three narrow categories:
- micro enterprises with an annual turnover of less than RM 250,000 or less than five employees;
- small enterprises with annual turnover between RM 250,000 and less than RM 10 million or five to 50 full-time employees; and
- medium enterprises with annual turnover between RM 10 million and RM 25 million or 51 to 150 full-time employees.
- Services, primary agriculture and information, and communication and technology, which also consist of three narrow categories:
- micro enterprises with an annual turnover of less than RM 200,000 or less than five employees;
- small enterprises with annual turnover between RM 200,000 and less than RM 1 million or five to 19 full-time employees; and
- Medium enterprises with annual turnover between RM 1 million and RM 5 million or 20 to 50 full-time employees.
2.2. Service Providers in Malaysia
2.3. SMEs Internationalization
2.4. Co-Creation in SMEs Internationalization
2.5. Digital Technologies
3. Methodology
3.1. Method and Case Selection
3.2. Data Collection and Analysis
4. Findings
4.1. Case Overview
4.1.1. Company A (CA)
4.1.2. Company B (CB)
4.2. Platforms Used in the Co-Creation
4.3. The Value Creation SMEs
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bouwman, H.; Nikou, S.; Molina-castillo, F.J.; De Reuver, M. The impact of digitalization on business models. Digit. Policy Regul. Gov. 2018, 20, 105–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.Y.; Falahat, M.; Sia, B. Drivers of digital adoption: A multiple case analysis among low and high-tech industries in Malaysia. Asia-Pac. J. Bus. Adm. 2020, 13, 80–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Couto, M.; Ferreira, J.J. Brand Management as an Internationalization Strategy for SME: A Multiple Case Study. J. Glob. Mark. 2017, 30, 192–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashim, F. Challenges for the Internationalization of SMEs and the Role of Government: The Case of Malaysia. J. Int. Bus. Econ. 2012, 13, 97–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinho, J.C.M.; Martins, L.; Soares, A.M. Small businesses’ internationalization: International readiness in the context of Asian countries. Asia-Pac. J. Bus. Adm. 2018, 10, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hitt, M.A.; Li, D.; Xu, K. International strategy: From local to global and beyond. J. World Bus. 2016, 51, 58–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rochayatun, S.; Sudarmiatin, S.; Rosmiza, B. Networking, Personality and Institutional Factors on SMEs Internationalization Process: A Literature-Based View. Asian J. Econ. Bus. Account. 2022, 22, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribau, C.P.; Raposo, M. SME internationalization research: Mapping the state of the art. Can. J. Adm. Sci. 2018, 35, 280–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahiya, E.T. Five decades of research on export barriers: Review and future directions. Int. Bus. Rev. 2018, 27, 1172–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.Y.; Falahat, M. The Impact of Digitalization and Resources on Gaining Competitive Advantage in International Markets: The Mediating Role of Marketing, Innovation and Learning Capabilities. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2019, 9, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lungu, A.E.; Bogoslov, I.A.; Stoica, E.A. From Decision to Survival—Shifting the Paradigm in Entrepreneurship during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purbasari, R.; Muttaqin, Z.; Sari, D.S. Digital Entrepreneurship in Pandemic COVID 19 Era: The Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Framework. Rev. Integr. Bus. Econ. Res. 2021, 10, 114–135. [Google Scholar]
- Reuters. World Bank Sees Weak Growth in 2023 for Eastern Europe, Central Asia. 2022. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/markets/asia/world-bank-sees-weak-growth-2023-eastern-europe-central-asian-countries (accessed on 2 October 2022).
- Franco, M.; Godinho, L.; Rodrigues, M. Exploring the influence of digital entrepreneurship on SME digitalization and management. Small Enterp. Res. 2021, 28, 269–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MATRADE. Available online: https://www.matrade.gov.my (accessed on 18 March 2022).
- Oparaocha, G.O. SMEs and international entrepreneurship: An institutional network perspective. Int. Bus. Rev. 2015, 24, 861–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Set, K. The awareness and use on government assistance programs among tourism entrepreneurs in Malaysia. Int. J. Entrep. Adv. Appl. Sci. 2017, 4, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coudounaris, D.N. Export promotion programmes for assisting SMEs. Rev. Int. Bus. Strategy 2018, 28, 77–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haddoud, M.Y.; Jones, P.; Newbery, R. Export promotion programmes and SMEs’ performance: Exploring the network promotion role. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2017, 24, 68–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Idris, B.; Saridakis, G. Local formal interpersonal networks and SMEs internationalization: Empirical evidence from the UK. Int. Bus. Rev. 2018, 27, 610–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ayob, A.H.; Freixanet, J. Insights into public export promotion programs in an emerging economy: The case of Malaysian SMEs. Eval. Program Plan. 2014, 46, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Senik, Z.C.; Scott-ladd, B. Networking and internationalization of SMEs in emerging economies. J. Int. Entrep. 2011, 9, 259–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargo, S.L.; Lusch, R.F. Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. J. Mark. 2004, 68, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargo, S.L.; Lusch, R.F. Service-dominant logic 2025. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2017, 34, 46–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tossavainen, P.J. Co-create with stakeholders: Action research approach in service development. Action Res. 2017, 15, 276–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ramaswamy, V.; Ozcan, K. What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 84, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramaswamy, V.; Ozcan, K. Digitalized Interactive Platforms: Turning Goods and Services into Retail Co-Creation Experiences. Mark. Intell. Rev. 2019, 11, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kruger, C.; Caiado, R.G.G.; França, S.L.B.; Quelhas, O.L.G. A holistic model integrating value co-creation methodologies towards the sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 191, 400–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Best, B.; Moffett, S.; Mcadam, R. Stakeholder salience in public sector value co- creation. Public Manag. Rev. 2019, 191, 1707–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamaruddin, N.I.; Khalid, F.A.; Jabar, J. Impact of Constraints towards Performance of Food Manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia. J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 2018, 10, 822–838. [Google Scholar]
- SME Corporation Malaysia. SME Insights 2019/2020; SME Corporation Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2021. Available online: https://www.smecorp.gov.my (accessed on 15 March 2022).
- Masnan, F.; Saad, N.; Ramlee, A.A. Assessing the Implications of Dynamic Capability and International Opportunity Recognition on Export Performance of Manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia Assessing the Implications of Dynamic Capability and International Opportunity Recognition on Export Perform. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2018, 8, 361–373. [Google Scholar]
- Osei-bonsu, N. Understanding the Internationalization Process of Small-to Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprises (SMEs): Evidence from Developing Countries. Eur. J. Bus. Manag. 2014, 6, 167–186. [Google Scholar]
- Wikström, S.; Decosta, P.L.E. How is value created?—Extending the value concept in the Swedish context. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 40, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mamun, A.A.L.; Fazal, S.A.L.I.; Mohiuddin, M.; Su, Z. Strategic Orientations, The Mediating Effect of Absorptive Capacity and Innovation: A Study Among Malaysian Manufacturing SMEs. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2019, 23, 1950016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caiazza, R. Internationalization of SMEs in high potential markets. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 58, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oertzen, A.; Odekerken-Schröder, G.; Brax, S.A.; Mager, B. Co-creating services—Conceptual clarification, forms and outcomes services. J. Serv. Manag. 2018, 29, 641–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wittkop, A.; Wagner, R. How Digitalization Changes the Internationalization of Entrepreneurial Firms: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Evidence. Manag. Dyn. Knowl. Econ. 2018, 6, 193–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dethine, B.; Enjolras, M.; Monticolo, D.; Zuckerberg, M. Digitalization and SMEs’ Export Management: Impacts on Resources and Capabilities. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2020, 10, 18–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hervé, A.; Schmitt, C.; Baldegger, R. Internationalization and Digitalization: Applying digital technologies to the internationalization process of small and medium-sized enterprises. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2020, 10, 29–41. [Google Scholar]
- Leonidou, L.C.; Katsikeas, C.S.; Samiee, S. International Marketing Research: A State-of-the-Art Review and the Way Forward. Adv. Glob. Mark. 2018, 3–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hennart, J. The Accidental Internationalists: A Theory of Born Globals. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2014, 2012, 117–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mattsson, L.G.; Andersson, P. Private-public interaction in public service innovation processes-business model challenges for a start-up EdTech firm. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2019, 34, 1106–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haddoud, M.Y.; Onjewu, A.K.; Jones, P.; Newbery, R. Investigating the moderating role of Export Promotion Programmes using evidence from North-Africa. Crit. Perspect. Int. Bus. 2018, 14, 282–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Denicolai, S.; Zucchella, A.; Magnani, G. Internationalization, digitalization, and sustainability: Are SMEs ready? A survey on synergies and substituting effects among growth paths. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 166, 120650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johanson, J.; Vahlne, J.E. The Internationalization Process of the Firm-A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments. In International Business; Routledge: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Ojala, A.; Evers, N.; Rialp, A. Extending the international new venture phenomenon to digital platform providers: A longitudinal case study. J. World Bus. 2018, 53, 725–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National SME Development Council. SME Annual Report 2011/12; National SME Development Council: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2012; p. 179.
- United Nations. A/RES/70/1-Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available online: https://www.unfpa.org/resources/transforming-our-world-2030-agenda-sustainable-development (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- Bembom, M.; Schwens, C. The role of networks in early internationalizing firms: A systematic review and future research agenda. Eur. Manag. J. 2018, 36, 679–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashim, F. SMEs’ impediments and developments in the internationalization process Malaysian experiences. World J. Entrep. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 11, 100–119. [Google Scholar]
- Prime Minister Office. Dasar Keusahawanan Nasional 2030. 2019. Available online: https://www.pmo.gov.my/ms/2019/08/dasar-keusahawanan-nasional/ (accessed on 15 March 2022).
- SME Corporation Malaysia. National SME Development Council and Key Initiatives. In SME Annual Report 2016/2017; SME Corporation Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2017; pp. 50–59. [Google Scholar]
- Abdul Kohar, U.H.; McMurray, J.A.; Peszynski, K. The Influence of Foreign Investment on Malaysian Bumiputera Technology Firms: 1957–2016. J. Manag. Hist. 2017, 23, 278–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zainol, F.A.; Wan Daud, W.N. Indigenous (Bumiputera) Malay Entrepreneurs in Malaysia. Int. Bus. Manag. 2011, 2, 86–99. [Google Scholar]
- Matarazzo, M.; Penco, L.; Profumo, G. How is digital transformation changing business models and internationalization in Made in Italy SMEs? Ital. J. Manag. 2020, 38, 89–107. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Finance Malaysia. Economic Outlook 2021. 2021. Available online: https://belanjawan2021.treasury.gov.my/index.php/en/te-2021 (accessed on 15 March 2022).
- Ruzzier, M.; Hisrich, R.D.; Antoncic, B. SME internationalization research: Past, present. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2009, 13, 476–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, W.; Holmström-Lind, C.; Johanson, M. Leveraging networks, capabilities and opportunities for international success: A study on returnee entrepreneurial ventures. Scand. J. Manag. 2018, 34, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reuber, A.R.; Knight, G.A.; Liesch, P.W. International entrepreneurship: The pursuit of entrepreneurial opportunities across national borders. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2018, 49, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cerrato, D.; Crosato, L.; Depperu, D. Archetypes of SME internationalization: A configurational approach. Int. Bus. Rev. 2016, 25, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zahra, S.A. A theory of international new ventures: A decade of research. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2005, 36, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oviatt, B.M.; McDougall, P.P. Toward a Theory of International New Ventures. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2005, 36, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oviatt, B.M.; McDougall, P.P. Challenges for Internationalization Process Theory: The Case of International New Ventures. Manag. Int. Rev. 2015, 37, 51–70. [Google Scholar]
- Crick, D.; Crick, J.M. The internationalization strategies of rapidly internationalizing high-tech UK SMEs Planned and unplanned activities. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2014, 26, 421–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frederiksen, D.L.; Brem, A. How do entrepreneurs think they create value? A scientific reflection of Eric Ries’ Lean Startup approach. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2017, 13, 169–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knight, G.A.; Cavusgil, S.T. Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2004, 35, 124–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sasi, V.; Arenius, P. International new ventures and social networks: Advantage or liability? Eur. Manag. J. 2008, 26, 400–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavusgil, S.T.; Knight, G. The born global firm: An entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2015, 46, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coviello, N.E. Re-thinking research on born globals. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2015, 46, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knight, G.A.; Liesch, P.W. Internationalization: From incremental to born global. J. World Bus. 2016, 51, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choquette, E.; Rask, M.; Sala, D.; Schröder, P. Born Globals—Is there fire behind the smoke? Int. Bus. Rev. 2017, 26, 448–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dzikowski, P. A bibliometric analysis of born global firms. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 85, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindsay, V.; Rod, M.; Ashill, N. Institutional and resource configurations associated with different SME foreign market entry modes. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2017, 66, 130–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Øyna, S.; Alon, I. A Review of Born globals. Int. Stud. Manag. Organ. 2018, 48, 157–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weerawardena, J.; Salunke, S.; Knight, G.; Sullivan, G.; Liesch, P.W. The learning subsystem interplay in service innovation in born global service firm internationalization. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 89, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, A.; Brewer, P.; Liesch, P. Rigidity in SME export commencement decisions. Int. Bus. Rev. 2018, 27, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soto-Acosta, P.; Cismaru, D.M.; Vătămănescu, E.M.; Ciochină, R. Sustainable entrepreneurship in SMEs: A business performance perspective. Sustainability 2016, 8, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breckova, P. Export patterns of small and medium sized enterprises. Eur. Res. Stud. J. 2018, 21, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roy, A.; Sekhar, C.; Vyas, V. Barriers to internationalization: A study of small and medium enterprises in India. J. Int. Entrep. 2016, 14, 513–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javier Maqueda Lafuente, F.; María Gil Lafuente, A.; FGuzman-Parra, V.; Gil Lafuente, J. Key factors for entrepreneurial success. Manag. Decis. 2013, 51, 1932–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, J.; Parthasarathy, S.; Gupta, P. Exporting challenges of SMEs: A review and future research agenda. J. World Bus. 2017, 52, 327–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alipour, M.; Kord, B.; Tofighi, E. A study of different types of business risks and their effects on banks’ outsourcing process (Case Study: Tejarat bank in Iran). Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2016, 2, 227–237. [Google Scholar]
- Mohamad, A.; Rizal, A.M.; Basiruddin, R.; Kamarudin, S. Digital Interactions and Internationalization of Small, Medium Enterprises. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 2019, 8, 11029–11034. [Google Scholar]
- Ahi, A.; Baronchelli, G.; Kuivalainen, O.; Piantoni, M. International Market Entry: How Do Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Make Decisions? J. Int. Mark. 2017, 25, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerschewski, S.; Evers, N.; Tuan, A. Trade Shows and SME Internationalization: Networking for Performance. Manag. Int. Rev. 2020, 60, 573–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.; Falahat, M.; Sia, B. Impact of Digitalization on the Speed of Internationalization. Int. Bus. Res. 2019, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weerawardena, J.; Mort, G.S.; Liesch, P.W. Capabilities development and deployment activities in born global B-to-B firms for early entry into international markets. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2019, 78, 122–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nichter, S.; Goldmark, L. Small Firm Growth in Developing Countries. World Dev. 2009, 37, 1453–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.; Uddin, M.; Lodorfos, G. Barriers to enter in foreign markets: Evidence from SMEs in emerging market. Int. Mark. Rev. 2017, 34, 68–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandra, A.; Paul, J.; Chavan, M. Internationalization barriers of SMEs from developing countries: A review and research agenda. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2020, 26, 1281–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauwers, R.D.; Van Der Bank, J.; Montakhabi, M. Trust, Transparency and Security in te Sharing Economy: What is the Government’s Role? Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2020, 10, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leite, Y.V.P.; de Moraes, W.F.A.; Salazar, V.S. Expressions of Relationship Networking in International Entrepreneurship. J. Int. Entrep. 2016, 14, 213–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musteen, M.; Wadhwa, P.; Mccormick, M. Technological innovation among internationality active SMEs in the Czech economy: Role of human and social capital of CEO. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2017, 29, 164–180. [Google Scholar]
- Prahalad, C.K.; Ramaswamy, V. Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy Leadersh. 2010, 32, 4–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramaswamy, V. Co-creation of value—Towards an expanded paradigm of value creation. Mark. Rev. 2009, 26, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grönroos, C. Service logic revisited: Who creates value? And who co-creates? Eur. Bus. Rev. 2008, 20, 298–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leclercq, T.; Hammedi, W.; Poncin, I. Ten years of value cocreation: An integrative review. Rech. Appl. Mark. 2016, 31, 26–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harkison, T. The use of co-creation within the luxury accommodation experience—Myth or reality? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 71, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiścicka-Fernando, M.; Misiak-Kwit, S.; Fernando, K.S.D. Co-Creation as an innovative way to develop an enterprise-cross-country analysis. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Westerlund, M. Digitalization, internationalization and scaling of online SMEs. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2020, 10, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves, H.; Fernandes, C.; Raposo, M. Value co-creation: Concept and contexts of application and study. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 1626–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nambisan, S. Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2016, 414, 1029–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, M.H. The role of digital & social media marketing in present global crisis (A critical review on the UK online fashion retailers’ performance during COVID). Int. J. Multidiscip. Curr. Educ. Res. 2021, 3, 58–65. [Google Scholar]
- Dabic, M.; Maley, J.; Dana, L.; Novak, I.; Pellegrini, M.M. Pathways of SME internationalization: A bibliometric and systematic review. Small Bus. Econ. 2020, 55, 705–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ramdani, B.; Raja, S.; Kayumova, M. Digital innovation in SMEs: A systematic review, synthesis and research agenda. Inf. Technol. Dev. 2022, 28, 56–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vadana, I.; Torkkeli, L. Digitalization of companies in international entrepreneurship and marketing. Int. Mark. Rev. 2020, 37, 471–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kromidha, E.; Robson, P.J.A. The role of digital presence and investment network signals on the internationalization of small firms. Int. Small Bus. J. Res. Entrep. 2021, 39, 109–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ober, J. Open Innovation in the ICT Industry: Substantiation from Poland. J. Open Innov. 2022, 8, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rayna, T.; Striukova, L. Open innovation 2.0: Is co-creation the ultimate challenge? Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2015, 69, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Troise, C.; Matricano, D.; Sorrentino, M. Open Innovation Platforms: Exploring the importance of knowledge in supporting online initiatives. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 2021, 19, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osorno, R.; Medrano, N. Open Innovation Platforms: A Conceptual Design Framework. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2022, 69, 438–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reuver, M.; De Sørensen, C.; Basole, R.C. The digital platform: A research agenda. J. Inf. Technol. 2018, 33, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lemme, R.P. The coordination of export promotion networks for the creative industries. Int. J. Export. Mark. 2018, 2, 4–27. [Google Scholar]
- Battaglia, D.; Neirotti, P.; Paolucci, E. The role of R&D investments and export on SMEs’ growth: A domain ambidexterity perspective. Manag. Decis. 2018, 56, 1883–1903. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, J.; Khan, Z.; De Silva, M. The emergence of multi-sided platform MNEs: Internalization theory and networks. Int. Bus. Rev. 2019, 28, 101598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zonta, T.C.; Amal, M. Internationalization and innovation: The case of a born global from Brazil. Rev. Int. Bus. 2018, 13, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fraccastoro, S.; Gabrielsson, M.; Chetty, S. Social Media Firm Specific Advantages as Enablers of Network Embeddedness of International Entrepreneurial Ventures. J. World Bus. 2021, 56, 101–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- St-Pierre, J.; Sakka, O.; Bahri, M. External Financing, Export Intensity and Inter-Organizational Collaborations: Evidence from Canadian SMEs. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2018, 56, 68–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gill, L.; White, L.; Cameron, I.D. Qualitative Triadic Study of the Relational Factors Influencing the Formation of Quality in a Community-Based Aged Health Care Service Network. Health Mark. Q. 2011, 28, 155–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borders, L.D. Dyadic, triadic, and group models of peer supervision / consultation: What are their components, and is there evidence of their effectiveness? Clin. Psychol. 2012, 16, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merriam, S.B.; Grenier, R.S. Qualitative Research in Practice, 2nd ed.; Wiley Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2019; ISBN 9781119452027. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2014; ISBN 9781452242569. [Google Scholar]
Focus Area | Total Programs | % | Financial Expenditure | % | Total SMEs | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RM (in Million) | ||||||
Human Capital Development | 99 | 31.1 | 3285.10 | 19.6 | 561,190 | 48.1 |
Access to Financing | 93 | 29.3 | 12,687.10 | 75.9 | 459,173 | 39.3 |
Market Access | 47 | 14.8 | 188.3 | 1.1 | 23,430 | 2 |
Innovation and Technology Adoption | 43 | 13.5 | 418 | 2.5 | 50,244 | 4.3 |
Infrastructure | 36 | 11.3 | 142.5 | 0.9 | 73,023 | 6.3 |
Total | 318 | 16,721 | 1,167,060 |
ID | Respondents | Position | Affiliation |
---|---|---|---|
CA | SMEs | Owner | Company A |
CB | SMEs | Owner | Company B |
SPA | Service Provider representative | Director | SME Corp |
SPB | Service Provider representative | Director | MATRADE |
SPC | Service Provider representative | Director | MARA |
EA | Expert | Consultant | Malaysian Export Academy |
EB | Expert | Consultant | Malaysian Export Academy |
Source | Descriptions of Sources |
---|---|
Semi-structured interviews (n = 7) | Company A (CA) Company B (CB) Service Provider A (SPA) Service Provider B (SPB) Service Provider C (SPC) Expert A (EA) Expert B (EB) |
Research observation (n = 3) | Meeting 1 (M1) Meeting 2 (M2) Meeting 3 (M3) |
Documentation (n = 21) | Company A and Company B (company website information, management financial reports, social media) Service Providers A, B and C (organization’s website information, press release, annual reports, assessment and evaluation report) |
Types of a Co-Creation Platform | Purpose of Co-Creation | |
---|---|---|
Theme | Terminologies Subtheme | |
Paper base | Brochures and pamphlets | Company information (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) |
Proposals | Support program application (CA, CB) | |
Formal Letters | Application (CA and CB) Offer letter (SPA, SPB and SPC) Collaboration (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) | |
Reports | Assessment and evaluation (SPA, SPB and SPC) Site visit (SPA, SPB and SPC) Official announcements (SPA, SPB and SPC) Press release (SPA, SPB and SPC) | |
Face to face | Meeting | Dialogue and document assessment (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) Memo, documentation and agreement (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) Meeting documentation- logistics, agenda, discussion and minute (SPA, SPB and SPC) Follow up meeting (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) |
Site Visit | Factory and equipment evaluation (CA and CB) | |
Telephone calls | Telephone calls | Advance information (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) Confirmation (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) |
Faxes | Faxes | Follow up documentation (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) Quotation (CA and CB) Sales order (CA and CB) |
Emails | Emails | Follow up documentation (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) Quotation (CA and CB) Sales order (CA and CB) |
Mobile phone application | Short Message Service (SMS) | Advance information (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) Follow-up meeting (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) Confirmation (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) |
WhatsApp Application | Interaction (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) Advance information (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) Confirmation (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC | |
Website | Web portal Web presence | Company information (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) Seeking information Business network Frequent Asked Question (FAQ) (SPA, SPB and SPC) |
Open innovation | Open source Crowdsourcing | Company information (CA, CB, SPA, SPB and SPC) Seeking information Product innovation Business network |
Social Media | Telegram, Facebook, and Twitter | Interaction (CA, SPA, SPB and SPC) Business network (CA, SPA, SPB and SPC) Updates (CA, SPA, SPB and SPC) |
Support Programs | Value Creation | |
---|---|---|
Theme | Subtheme | |
Human Capital Development | Entrepreneurial programs | Basic entrepreneurial knowledge (CA) Market knowledge (CA and CB) Product knowledge (CA) Promotion, branding, and marketing (CA and CB) |
Access to Financing | General soft financing | Working capital (CB) Production capacity (CA) Machinery and equipment (CA) Export readiness (CA and CB) |
Global Export Programs | To increase production capacity Machinery and equipment Working capital Promotion | |
Business grant | Marketing and promotion (CA) Machinery and equipment for production (CA) Product Development (CA and CB) | |
Access to Market | Domestic expos and carnivals | Domestic business networking (CA and CB) Exploring and expanding into new markets (CA and CB) |
Export promotion program | International business networking (CA and CB) Improving the business chain (CA and CB) Exploring and expanding into new markets (CA and CB) Enhance the company’s competitiveness (CA and CB) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mohamad, A.; Mohd Rizal, A.; Kamarudin, S.; Sahimi, M. Exploring the Co-Creation of Small and Medium Enterprises, and Service Providers Enabled by Digital Interactive Platforms for Internationalization: A Case Study in Malaysia. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316119
Mohamad A, Mohd Rizal A, Kamarudin S, Sahimi M. Exploring the Co-Creation of Small and Medium Enterprises, and Service Providers Enabled by Digital Interactive Platforms for Internationalization: A Case Study in Malaysia. Sustainability. 2022; 14(23):16119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316119
Chicago/Turabian StyleMohamad, Azlina, Adriana Mohd Rizal, Suzilawati Kamarudin, and Musli Sahimi. 2022. "Exploring the Co-Creation of Small and Medium Enterprises, and Service Providers Enabled by Digital Interactive Platforms for Internationalization: A Case Study in Malaysia" Sustainability 14, no. 23: 16119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316119