Next Article in Journal
Investigating the Interplay between Social Performance and Organisational Factors Supporting Circular Economy Practices
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Conventional and Microwave Heating on Protein and Odor Profile in Soymilk Powder
Previous Article in Journal
Data Stream Approach for Exploration of Droughts and Floods Driving Forces in the Dongting Lake Wetland
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Functional Properties of Egg White Protein and Whey Protein in the Presence of Bioactive Chicken Trachea Hydrolysate and Sodium Chloride

by
Teeda Pramualkijja
1,
Tantawan Pirak
1,* and
Stephen Robert Euston
2,*
1
Department of Product Development, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
2
School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(24), 16782; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416782
Submission received: 20 October 2022 / Revised: 6 December 2022 / Accepted: 12 December 2022 / Published: 14 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Food Production and Processing Development)

Abstract

:
The interactions of chicken trachea collagen hydrolysate (CTH) obtained from the enzymatic hydrolysis of by-products from a chicken slaughterhouse, with two common proteins (egg white (E) and whey (W) proteins) was studied with and without sodium chloride (NaCl). The treatments with two protein types (E and W at 10% w/w) and different CTH concentrations (0, 0.25, and 0.5% w/w) and NaCl concentrations (0 and 1.5% w/w) were conducted. The addition of CTH reduced the emulsifying and foaming properties of those proteins due to their fibrillar structure, while the addition of NaCl promoted the foaming capacity. Moreover, CTH and NaCl promoted the gelling properties of those proteins, as revealed by the shift-up of the storage modulus (G′) value. The rapid shifting at 60–70 °C indicated that the heat-set gelation was observed. The strong gel strength was exhibited with the mixture containing W. The addition of 1.5% w/w NaCl improved the antioxidant and antihypertensive activities of the mixture of 0.5% w/w CTH and 10% w/w W. The best DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP radical-scavenging activities (40.00, 180.95, and 46.00 TEAC µM/mL, respectively) and the lowest IC50 value of the ACE inhibitor (30.05 mg/mL) was revealed. This mixture exhibits the highest inhibitory activity and is suited for improving the functionalities of high-protein products.

1. Introduction

Post COVID-19, consumer needs and behaviors have changed, with a high emphasis placed on health-conscious choices in lifestyle and nutrition. Functional foods that help create consumer well-being are receiving additional research interest. Understanding how functional ingredients interact is very important for designing novel products with desirable bioactive properties. Meat products are an example of foods that are deemed unhealthy due to the presence of saturated fats, and are in competition with plant-based alternatives for consumer purchases. A healthier composition is required to improve the image of meat products in the marketplace. According to a consumer insight report from Mintel®, high protein is one of the trends that a consumer looks for [1]. In this respect, various types of protein hydrolysates and protein isolates have been added to increase the protein content of food products and improve food texture [2]. Egg white albumin has a high air absorption capacity and has been used for producing a foamy texture in food as well as its ability to form gels [3,4]. Similarly, bovine whey protein has been used for its gelling and emulsification characteristics [5,6]. These properties allow both protein types to be used as binders in meat products. Apart from these proteins, protein hydrolysate powder is also one of the main ingredients for increasing the protein level in meat products, whilst at the same time enhancing the functional and bioactive properties [7]. In addition to imparting their own properties on meat products, protein hydrolysates will also interact with the other proteins present. There are three main protein–protein interactions, including synergistic interactions, aggregation, and phase separation [8]. Several studies in the past few decades have reported that protein hydrolysates from various poultry by-product sources, including the heart, liver, gizzards, neck, head, bones, feathers, and blood, in addition to their nutritional properties, exhibited various biological functions [9]. All these tissues are high in protein that contains all the essential amino acids. Such hydrolysates provide a wide variety of health-promoting benefits including antioxidant and antihypertensive abilities [10,11]. The antioxidant properties of peptides from the extract of a chicken leg bone was revealed after hydrolysis [12]. Antihypertensive peptides isolated from a chicken bone and offal protein hydrolysate were investigated and found to inhibit the angiotensin-1-converting enzyme (ACE) effectively [13,14,15,16]. Preliminary studies have investigated chicken trachea collagen hydrolysate (CTH) produced with the commercial enzyme, Alcalase®, and have shown these to have interesting bioactive properties [14]. Such bioactive protein hydrolysates or peptides derived from poultry by-products are safe and attractive functional ingredients in food products as nutraceuticals [17,18,19].
The study of food protein–functional peptide interactions in model systems is of interest because it can help modify and improve the textural properties of foods, which is a major factor influencing consumer acceptance. This understanding can be used for the design of new healthy or functional meat products with novel organoleptic and functional properties. Our preliminary studies have successfully produced a bioactive chicken trachea collagen hydrolysate (CTH). This was obtained from by-products from the chicken slaughterhouse by hydrolysis with the commercial enzyme Alcalase® [20]. Another study also reported that Alcalase® is effective at hydrolyzing chicken skin gelatin and yields a hydrolysate with high antioxidant properties [21]. In the work reported here, the effect of CTH and sodium chloride on the functional properties of two common food protein samples (egg white and whey protein) was studied. A better understanding of the synergy between CTH and food proteins and the effect on the functional properties of these mixtures will inform their application in formulated meat product systems, such as low fat-reduced sodium restructured chicken ham in a follow-on study. Building on our previous study of CTH, where the production and bioactive properties of CTH were established, [20], here, we also report on how mixing CTH with egg white or whey protein and sodium chloride influences the bioactive properties of CTH, including the antioxidant and antihypertensive properties and the rheological, foaming, and emulsifying properties. If CTH is to be used as a bioactive component in reformulated meat products, it is important to understand if the interaction with other food proteins could reduce or enhance CTH bioactivity. These findings could be used to support the application of CTH in making meat products healthier through the exploitation of the bioactivity of the hydrolysate.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The chicken trachea was obtained from a Thai slaughterhouse company. The commercial protease enzyme, Alcalase®, was obtained from the Novozyme® (Bangkok, Thailand). Egg white and whey protein were gifts from Marlow Foods (Billingham, UK) and Arla Foods (Region Midtjylland, Viby J, Denmark), respectively, both with a protein content of 80%, as determined by Kjeldahl nitrogen analysis. Sodium dodecyl-sulfate (SDS), 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), 2,4,6-Tri(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine (TPTZ), and dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase, extracted from rabbit lung for bioactivity, were from purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
CTH was produced according to the method of Pramualkijja et al. [20] (by enzymatic hydrolysis of the trachea with Alcalase®). The hydrolyzed chicken trachea solution was separated using centrifugation and the soluble supernatant fraction dried under vacuum using a freeze dryer at −50 °C.

2.2. Protein Mixture Preparation

Mixtures of CTH (H) with egg white (E), WPC (W), and NaCl were prepared according to the treatment shown in Table 1. Firstly, the egg white or whey protein was dissolved in deionized water to a concentration of 10% protein (w/v). Different amounts of CTH and sodium chloride were added to the protein solution and stirred for 30 min until completely dissolved. The mixtures were covered with a watch glass, left at room temperature for 15 min, and then tested for their foaming ability, emulsifying capacity, rheological properties, antioxidant ability, and ACE inhibitory ability using the methods detailed below.

2.3. Foaming Ability of the Protein Mixtures in the System with and without Sodium Chloride

Foaming capacity and foam stability were measured according to the method of Nomana et al. [22]. A sample (50 mL) of 2% protein solution was placed in a 100 mL measuring cylinder and foam was prepared using a high-shear homogenizer (Ultra-Turrax, Ika UK.) at 20,000 rpm for 2 min. The foam volume was recorded immediately and every 1 min for 30 min. Foaming capacity and foaming stability were calculated using the equations:
Foaming   capacity   = V 2 V 1 V 1 × 100
where v1 is the volume before whipping and v2 is the volume after whipping.
foaming   stability   = foam   volume   after   30   min initial   foam   volume × 100

2.4. Emulsifying Capacity of the Protein Mixtures in the System with and without Sodium Chloride

The emulsifying activity index (EAI) and the emulsion stability index (ESI) were determined using the method previously described by Noman et al. [22], with some modifications. A total of 30 mL of the various protein solutions were mixed with 10 mL of sunflower oil and homogenized at 20,000 rpm for a minute using a high-shear mixer (Ultra-Turrax, Ika UK) to create the emulsion. Then, 50 μL of the emulsion was taken at the position of 1 cm above the bottom of the container and diluted with 5 mL of 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate solution. The absorbance of the solutions was measured at 500 nm at times of 0 and 10 min after the end of homogenization using a spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, Genesys10 s UV-Vis spectrophotometer). All EAI and ESI values were reported as the mean of at least five measurements. The EAI is calculated using the equation:
EAI   m 2 / g = 2 ×   Con ×   dil   ×   A C   × θ   × 10 , 000 × ϕ  
where Con is the constant of 2.303, dil is the dilution factor (200), A is the absorbance at 500 nm, C is the protein concentration (g/mL), θ is the disperse phase volume fraction (0.25), and ϕ is the optical path (0.01 m). In this equation, the absorbance is converted to a turbidity using the equation,
T = Con × A × dilution light   path   length
The ESI is calculated as,
ESI   min = A 0 × Δ t Δ A
where ΔA = A0–A10 and Δt = 10 min.

2.5. Rheological Properties of the Protein Mixtures in the System with and without Sodium Chloride

All rheological properties were determined using a Malvern Kinexus controlled stress rheometer (Kinexus, NETZSCH GmbH, Benton Harbor, MI, USA), fitted with a 4°/40 mm cone and plate-measuring geometry with a 140 μm gap. The temperature was maintained at 4 °C. The linear viscoelastic region (LVER) was determined by an amplitude sweep test with strain increased from 0.1 to 100% at a constant frequency of 1 Hz. Temperature sweeps were carried out between 4 and 90 °C at a heating rate of 2 °C/min. The expansion during temperature sweep test was monitored and there was no evidence of the cone touching the plate. Moisture loss from the sample was reduced by using a water trap and surrounding the plate with low viscosity silicone oil.

2.6. Antioxidant Ability of the Protein Mixtures in the System with and without Sodium Chloride

Protein solutions were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min using a high-speed microcentrifuge (Benchmark, MC-12™, Tempe, AZ, USA) and the supernatant was collected and analyzed for antioxidant activity using three tests.

2.6.1. DPPH Assay

The scavenging effects of protein solutions or Trolox (as a control) for the DPPH radical were measured using a method given by Chakka et al. [23]. First, 500 µL of test sample was mixed with 500 µL of 0.1 mM DPPH in 95% ethanol, vortex mixed for 1 min, and left at room temperature for 30 min in the dark. The absorbance was read at 517 nm with a UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Genesys10 s). The DPPH radical scavenging ability was calculated using the equation:
% DPPH   scavenging   activity   = 1 A sample A blank A control × 100
where Acontrol is the absorbance of DPPH solution without sample, Asample is the absorbance of the DPPH solution plus test sample, and Ablank is the absorbance of phosphate buffer with DPPH solution (without sample).
Trolox in the range of 5–50 µM was used to make a standard curve. The DPPH activity of CTH was expressed as µmol Trolox equivalents (TE)/mg CTH.

2.6.2. ABTS Assay

The method of Binsan et al. [24] was used to measure ABTS radical scavenging activity of the protein mixture solution or Trolox. First, 10 mL of 7 mM 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) was mixed with 5 mL of 2.45 mM potassium persulfate and incubated for 15 h at 37 °C. Then, 900 µl of this ABTS solution was added to 100 µL of protein solution and allowed to stand for 6 min at room temperature. For the control, 100 µL of phosphate buffer was used instead of the protein solution. A sample blank was prepared by adding buffer instead of ABTS. Absorbance of the reaction mixture was measured at 734 nm (Thermo Scientific, Genesys10 s) and scavenging activity was calculated with the equation below:
% ABTS   scavengineg   activity   = 1 A sample   A blank A control × 100
Trolox in the range of 20–200 µM was used to prepare a standard curve. ABTS scavenging activity was expressed as µmol Trolox equivalents (TE)/mg sample.

2.6.3. FRAP Assay

The ferric reducing ability (FRAP) method, as described by Benzie and Strain [25], was applied to measure the ferric ion reducing capacity of the protein solutions. In this assay, a complex is formed between the ferric ions of FeCl3 and tripiridiltriazine (TPTZ). In the presence of reducing agents, the Fe(III) ions are reduced to Fe(II), resulting in a blue-colored complex that adsorbs at 595 nm. FRAP solution was prepared by mixing acetate buffer (300 mM, pH 3.6), TPTZ (10 mM in 40 mM HCl), and FeCl3.6H2O (20 mM) in the volume ratio 10:1:1. Then, 300 μL of FRAP solution was added to 10 μL of protein solution and 30μL of distilled water, all at 37 °C. Absorbance was measured 30 min after mixing at 595 nm in a UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Genesys10 s). Ferrous sulfate was used to make a standard curve, which relates the concentration of this compound to the absorbance at 595 nm. Results were expressed as Trolox equivalents (TE)/mg sample.

2.7. ACE Inhibitor Ability of the Protein Mixtures in the System with and without Sodium Chloride

The protein mixture which had the best antioxidant properties for each protein was measured for its ACE inhibitory activity. CTH, egg protein, and whey protein were used as controls. ACE inhibition was monitored by the method proposed by Cheng et al. [26], with slight modifications. The protein mixture was diluted using distilled water at ratios of 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, and 25:75 (v/v). The samples and enzyme were dissolved in 50 mM HEPES-NaOH/300 mM NaCl (pH 8.3) buffer. The, 50 µL of ACE solution (8 mU/50 mL) was added to 30 μL of protein in HEPES buffer and held at 37 °C for 5 min. To this mixture, 50 μL of hippuryl-L-histidyl-L-leucine (HHL, 6 mg/mL) solution was added and held in a water bath at 37 °C for 15 min. The enzyme in the ACE solution hydrolyzed the HHL, releasing hippuric acid. After 15 min, the enzyme reaction was terminated by adding 380 μL of 1 M HCl. Then, 1.5 mL of ethyl acetate was added to extract the hippuric acid after vortex mixing for 1 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min using a high-speed microcentrifuge (Benchmark, MC-12™). Next, 1 mL of the supernatant was removed and the ethyl acetate evaporated by heating in boiling water. After that, 1 mL of water was added to dissolve the remaining hippuric acid and the absorbance read at 228 nm. The ACE-inhibitory activity (%) was calculated as:
% ACE   inhibitor   activity   = 1 A sample   A sample   blank A control   A control   blank × 100
where Acontrol is the absorbance of 50 mM HEPES-NaOH/300 mM NaCl buffer without sample, Asample is the absorbance of 50 mM HEPES-NaOH/300 mM NaCl buffer with sample, and Acontrol blank and Asample blank are ACE solutions added to the reaction without termination of the reaction with 1 M HCl.
The IC50 value was defined as the concentration of inhibitor required to inhibit 50% of the ACE activity.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using computational program. Statistical significance at 95% significance interval was analyzed using an independent sample T-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the significance level was tested using Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05) located in the SPSS software package (12.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc., Bangkok, Thailand).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. CTH Properties

In a previous paper [20], we reported the properties of bioactive CTH solutions. We noted that the main amino acids in CTH were glutamic acid (Glu, 11.80%), glycine (Gly, 8.65%), and proline (Pro, 5.82%). Furthermore, CTH showed significant antioxidant potential with a DPPH of 4.42 TEAC mM/mL, ABTS of 134.29 TEAC mM/mL, and FRAP of 22.48 TEAC mM/mL. Additionally, the ACE inhibitory test showed an IC50 of 0.422 mg/mL (p ≤ 0.05).

3.2. Foaming Ability of the Protein Mixtures in the System with and without Sodium Chloride

The effect of CTH and NaCl on the foaming capacity and foam stability of egg white and whey protein are presented in Figure 1. The mixture of egg white mostly had a higher foaming ability than the mixture with whey protein (p < 0.05), and all egg white protein treatments gave a higher foam stability than those made with whey protein (Figure 1B). The increasing CTH concentration gave a trend of a decreasing foaming capacity for egg white, although this was only statistically significant for the foam with 0.5% CTH added compared to the egg white foam with no added CTH. The addition of CTH to the WPC system did not give a significant difference in all the added concentrations (p > 0.05). The addition of CTH only gave a significant decrease in foam stability for the E/0.5 H treatment, whilst there was no effect observed on the stability of the WPC mixture. The addition of NaCl to the protein and CTH mixture markedly improved the foaming ability for both the egg white and WPC foams, while foam stability improvement was found in the mixture with egg white. The effect of salt on the WPC and CTH mixture was a marginal increase with a non-significant effect (p > 0.05). The foaming properties of food proteins are controlled by the diffusion, penetration, and rearrangement of molecules at the air–water interface. Hydrophobic regions largely determine the adsorption of molecules at the air–water interface, whilst the extent of protein–protein interactions at the interface affects the nature of film formation and foam stability [27]. Presumably, CTH and NaCl interfere with these interactions and alter the foaming properties of egg white and WPC.
Raikos et al. [27] reported that increasing the NaCl concentration, heating temperature, and whipping time enhanced egg white protein foam formation but did not affect foam stability, results that are broadly in line with our own. They speculated that this was due to the screening of the protein charge by ions from the NaCl which allowed a greater adsorption of protein at the air–water interface. The same effect was observed by others [28]. Ovalbumin is the most abundant protein in egg white, an ingredient widely used to promote foam formation properties in food systems. The excellent foaming property of whipped egg white is the result of interactions between conalbumin, ovomucin, and ovoglobulin [29]. As well as promoting protein adsorption, it is possible that NaCl also alters the interactions between the proteins in egg white. The reduction of foam stability by CTH could be explained by competitive adsorption between the CTH peptides and egg white proteins. This is a phenomenon where different proteins compete for space at interfaces based on their relative surface activity [30]. If CTH outcompetes intact proteins at the air–water foam interface, and if the CTH is a poorer foaming agent, then the hydrolysate will reduce the foaming ability and stability.

3.3. Emulsifying Capacity of the Protein Mixtures in the System with and without Sodium Chloride

The emulsifying activity index of the different protein mixture is shown in Figure 2A. Emulsions containing whey protein had higher emulsifying activity index values than those containing egg protein. The addition of CTH and NaCl had a small but statistically insignificant impact (p < 0.05) on emulsion formation by the whey protein solution. The addition of CTH decreased the emulsifying ability of the egg protein solution, which slightly improved when NaCl was added (p > 0.05). On the other hand, the addition of CTH and salt to the egg protein solution significantly improved the emulsion stability (p < 0.05), whereas this was not observed for the whey protein solution (Figure 2B), where a reduction in stability occurred in the presence of CTH and/or salt.
CTH and NaCl significantly increased the stability of the egg protein emulsions but decreased the stability of the whey protein emulsions (Figure 2A,B). The emulsifying activity index reflects the ability of the protein to be rapidly adsorbed at the water/oil interface during the formation of the emulsion [31]. The addition of salt is known to promote protein-stabilized emulsion droplet aggregation, with an increased salt concentration giving greater instability [32]. Clearly, CTH and salt affect the emulsifying ability of egg white and whey proteins, but in different ways. CTH contains abundant hydrophobic amino acid residues that can interact with hydrophobic patches on the surface of proteins. This effect on emulsion stability may be due to differences in the way that the two proteins interact with CTH.

3.4. Rheological Properties of the Protein Mixtures in the System with and without Sodium Chloride

The rheological properties of the solutions of egg white and whey protein with added CTH were characterized. The amplitude sweep is shown in Figure 3 for different protein and CTH combinations. Adding CTH to a 10% egg white solution significantly increased the Gʹ value in the LVER, while the addition of CTH to 10% whey protein produced only a modest increase in Gʹ. Adding salt had a similar effect, with the egg white and egg white + CTH solutions producing a further significant increase in Gʹ in the LVER, while the increase for the whey protein solutions was again modest. There was no apparent effect on the yield strain of the solution. In Figure 3, strains above about 0.25% led to a flow in the whey protein solution, as the structure was broken by the increased strain [33]. Egg white solutions with and without CTH were more resistant to the increasing strain; a strain above about 0.5% is required for the solutions to flow. Consequently, a strain of 0.1% (within the linear viscoelastic region) was selected for the heating tests, to remain within the LVER.
The results from the temperature sweep test are shown in Figure 4 as Gʹ versus temperature. The Gʹ rheograms of the protein solution showed that all egg protein solutions (with and without CTH or salt) had lower initial Gʹ values than those from whey protein solutions. There were higher Gʹ values for egg + CTH and/or salt and whey protein + CTH and/or salt solutions than solutions of the proteins alone, confirming the data in the amplitude sweep. All protein solutions had similar temperature profiles, where Gʹ initially decreased as the temperature increased to about 28 °C. Being a mixture of proteins, both egg white and whey protein (to a lesser degree) will show a complex heat denaturation behavior. In Figure 4, above about 40 °C, the viscosity started to increase as proteins started to denature and aggregate. Above 60 °C, there was a more rapid increase in Gʹ, corresponding to the denaturation and gelation temperature of the egg white [34]. While the CTH and salt addition increased the G′ value of the protein solutions, it did not change the denaturation and gelation temperature of the proteins, which remained at 60 °C for all combinations of protein, CTH, and salt. Notably, from Figure 4, the final gel strength (G′ at 90 °C) increased for egg white as more CTH/salt was added; however, there was no effect of CTH or salt on the final G′ values for the whey protein solutions. This suggests a synergistic interaction between CTH and egg white that is largely absent with whey protein.
The rheological properties of protein solutions depend on a number of factors (composition, molecular weight, size, shape, flexibility, degree of hydration, and intermolecular interactions). These are, in turn, influenced by extrinsic factors such as concentration, temperature, pH, ionic strength, and previous processing treatments [35]. The effect of NaCl on G′ can be explained by the enhanced formation of larger-size aggregates and the rate of aggregation, as observed by others for β-lactoglobulin or albumin with increasing NaCl concentrations [36,37].

3.5. Antioxidant Ability and ACE Inhibitory Ability of the Protein Mixtures in the System with and without Sodium Chloride

The antioxidant activity of the protein mixture solution was evaluated using free radical-scavenging activity assays, which relate to the scavenging activity of the Trolox concentration. The whey protein solution mixed with 0.5% CTH and 1.5% NaCl had the highest antioxidant activity (Figure 5) with DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP radical-scavenging activities of 40.00, 180.95, and 46.00 TEAC µM/mL, respectively. Figure 5 also shows that increasing the CTH concentration increased the antioxidant activity of both protein mixtures. Increasing the NaCl concentration, however, had a small effect of increasing the antioxidant activity of CTH in the presence of whey protein, but had no significant effect on CTH + egg white.
All egg white protein mixture solutions had lower antioxidant activity levels than the equivalent whey protein solution (p > 0.05). The results indicated that the DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP radical-scavenging activities of the protein mixture solution depended on the CTH concentration, the protein type, and the addition of NaCl.
The antihypertensive activity is defined as the concentration of the solution (based on the total protein content) required to inhibit 50% of the ACE activity, with the results presented in Figure 6. The CTH solution (0.5%) showed 50% inhibition of the reaction at 0.84 mg/mL, which was much lower than the IC50 for all mixtures of CTH with egg or whey protein. Of the protein + CTH mixtures, the whey protein solution mixed with 0.5% CTH and 1.5% NaCl had the lowest IC50 (30.05 mg/mL, highest antihypertensive activity), although this was not significantly (p < 0.05) different to the whey protein solution without NaCl (31.84 mg/mL). The addition of CTH and NaCl into the protein mixtures slightly enhanced antihypertensive activity. It is clear from these results that egg protein and whey protein interfere with the bioactive properties of CTH, with egg interfering more than whey protein.
It has been reported that ovalbumin and β-lactoglobulin, which are the main proteins found in egg white and whey protein, respectively, exhibit antioxidant properties through their multiple-binding sites and free radical-trapping properties [38,39]. Several studies have indicated the relationship between the antioxidative and antihypertensive properties of protein hydrolysates. Ambigaipalan et al. (2015) prepared date seed protein hydrolysates using commercial protease and reported that it had the lowest reducing power and ABTS radical scavenging activity, but a higher ACE inhibition and hydroxyl radical scavenging [40]. Yousr and Howell (2015) purified bioactive peptide from egg yolk protein using gel filtration and reported that it had a high ACE inhibitory activity (69%) and a high IC50 value (3.35 mg/mL) [41]. Chalamaiah et al. (2016) prepared protein hydrolysate from Rohu egg using Alcalase and reported that the maximum ACE inhibitory activity was 45% at the concentration of 1 mg/mL [42]. CTH is a protein hydrolysate from chicken trachea consisting of small peptides and amino acid residues. Hydrophobic amino acids in hydrolysates have been suggested to have antioxidant and antihypertensive properties [43], while some peptides are well-known to enhance antioxidant action [44]. Our results showed that the addition of egg protein or whey protein to CTH promoted the antioxidative, but reduced the antihypertensive properties of CTH. The effect of NaCl action on the antioxidant activity of protein systems was demonstrated by Tunieva and Kotenkova [45]. Furthermore, NaCl encourages increased protein solubility [46] which in the protein mixtures would increase the concentration of free amino acids from the hydrolysate in solution that may partly explain its effect on bioactive properties. It has been reported that the antioxidant and antihypertensive activity of hydrolyzed proteins were enhanced with the increasing free amino acid concentration [47,48].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the investigation of interactions between the selected two protein types (egg white and whey protein) with CTH in the system with and without NaCl was revealed and expressed in terms of bioactive and functional properties. The protein–salt mixture exhibited the most prominent properties suited for further application in real meat model systems. This mixture composed of 10% w/w whey protein, 0.5% w/w CTH, and 1.5% w/w NaCl. Moreover, CTH did not affect the emulsifying and foaming ability of whey protein, but reduced those for egg white protein. CTH had a positive effect on the rheological properties of both proteins. The mixture with whey protein exhibited a stronger gel strength than that of the egg white protein mixture. The addition of CTH and NaCl promoted the gelling properties of both proteins. The antioxidant and antihypertensive properties of the protein solutions were not influenced significantly by NaCl and had a higher activity when mixed with CTH, especially for the whey protein system. These results show that CTH has potential as a functional ingredient. However, when mixed with the common food proteins, egg white and whey protein, the antihypertensive effect of CTH is greatly reduced. If hydrolysates such as CTH are to be formulated into functional food meat products with health claims, it is important to understand the interactions between the bioactive components and other ingredients, and the trade-offs that occur when bioactive ingredients with properties that have been proven in simple model systems are incorporated into more complex food systems.

Author Contributions

Laboratory works, writing—original draft preparation by T.P. (Teeda Pramualkijja); supervision of this research, advising and correcting manuscript, and corresponding author by T.P. (Tantawan Pirak); and supervision of this research, advising and correcting this manuscript, and co-corresponding author by S.R.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by Research and Researchers for Industries, Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) (formerly Thailand Research Fund, TRF), and the National Research Council Thailand (NRCT) under RRI (PHD59I0014). The private company provided the chicken trachea sample and co-funded this research, but had no influence on the research method, data analysis, or report writing.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zegler, J.; Li, D.; Zanaza Bartalme, M.; Faulkner, D.; Koyenikan, A.; Mogelonky, M. 2022 Global Food and Drink Trends 2022; Mintel: London, UK, 2022; p. 28. [Google Scholar]
  2. Davis, J.P.; Foegeding, E.A. Comparisons of the foaming and interfacial properties of whey protein isolate and egg white proteins. Coll. Surf. B Biointerfaces 2007, 54, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Abeyrathne, E.D.N.S.; Huang, X.; Ahn, D.U. Antioxidant, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory activity and other functional properties of egg white proteins and their derived peptides—A review. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 1462–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cho, D.Y.; Jo, K.; Cho, S.Y.; Kim, J.M.; Lim, K.; Suh, H.J.; Oh, S. Antioxidant Effect and Functional Properties of Hydrolysates Derived from Egg-White Protein. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2014, 34, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Deeth, H.; Bansal, N. Whey Proteins: An overview. In Whey Proteins from Milk to Medicine; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pelegrine, D.H.G.; Gasparetto, C.A. Whey proteins solubility as function of temperature and pH. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 38, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Neto, Y.A.H.; Rosa, J.C.; Cabral, H. Peptides with antioxidant properties identified from casein, whey, and egg albumin hydrolysates generated by two novel fungal proteases. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 49, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sarbon, N.M.; Badii, F.; Howell, N.K. The effect of chicken skin gelatin and whey protein interactions on rheological and thermal properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 45, 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mullen, A.M.; Hayes, M.; Bolton, D.; Di Bernardini, R.; Rai, D.; Hayes, J.; Harnedy, P.; Stan, C. Nutraceutical and Functional Food Bioactive Peptides in Beef, Bovine Offals and Fermented Meat Products; Teagasc: Dublin, Ireland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lafarga, T.; Hayes, M. Bioactive peptides from meat muscle and by-products: Generation, functionality and application as functional ingredients. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jayathilakan, K.; Sultana, K.; Radhakrishna, K.; Bawa, A.S. Utilization of byproducts and waste materials from meat, poultry and fish processing industries: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 49, 278–293. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheng, F.-Y.; Wan, T.C.; Huang, C.W.; Tominaga, K.; Lin, L.C.; Sakata, R. The Effects of Chicken Leg Bone Extract on Antioxidative Properties under Different Heating Condition. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 21, 1815–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saiga, A.; Iwai, K.; Hayakawa, T.; Takahata, Y.; Kitamura, S.; Nishimura, T.; Morimatsu, F. Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme-Inhibitory Peptides Obtained from Chicken Collagen Hydrolysate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 9586–9591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nakade, K.; Kamishima, R.; Inoue, Y.; Ahhmed, A.; Kawahara, S.; Nakayama, T.; Maruyama, M.; Numata, M.; Ohta, K.; AOKI, T.; et al. Identification of an antihypertensive peptide derived from chicken bone extract. Anim. Sci. J. 2008, 79, 710–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fujita, H.; Yokoyama, K.; Yoshikawa, M. Classification and Antihypertensive Activity of Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Peptides Derived from Food Proteins. J. Food Sci. 2000, 65, 564–569. [Google Scholar]
  16. Terashima, M.; Baba, T.; Ikemoto, N.; Katayama, M.; Morimoto, T.; Matsumura, S. Novel angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides derived from boneless chicken leg meat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 7432–7436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Intorasoot, S. Antimicrobial peptides: The natural proteins and the future application for treatment of infectious diseases. Bull. Chiang Mai Assoc. Med. Sci. 2013, 46, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zanello, P.P.; Sforza, S.; Dossena, A.; Lambertini, F.; Bottesini, C.; Nikolaev, I.V.; Koroleva, O.; Ciociola, Y.; Magliani, W.; Conti, S.; et al. Antimicrobial activity of poultry bone and meat trimmings hydrolyzates in low-sodium turkey food. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Khiari, Z.; Pietrasik, Z.; Gaudette, N.J.; Betti, M. Poultry protein isolate prepared using an acid solubilization/precipitation extraction influences the microstructure, the functionality and the consumer acceptability of a processed meat product. Food Struct. 2014, 2, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pramualkijja, T.; Pirak, T.; Euston, S.R. Valorization of chicken slaughterhouse byproducts: Production and properties of chicken trachea hydrolysates using commercial proteases. Int. J. Food Prop. 2021, 24, 1642–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sarbon, N.M.; Badii, F.; Howell, N.K. Purification and characterization of antioxidative peptides derived from chicken skin gelatin hydrolysate. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 85, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Noman, A.; Xu, Y.; AL-Bukhaiti, W.Q.; Abed, S.M.; Ali, A.H.; Ramadhan, A.H.; Xia, W. Influence of enzymatic hydrolysis conditions on the degree of hydrolysis and functional properties of protein hydrolysate obtained from Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis) by using papain enzyme. Process Biochem. 2018, 67, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chakka, A.K.; Elias, M.; Jini, R.; Sakhare, P.Z.; Bhaskar, N. In-vitro antioxidant and antibacterial properties of fermentatively and enzymatically prepared chicken liver protein hydrolysates. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 8059–8067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Binsan, W.; Benjakul, S.; Visessanguan, W.; Roytrakul, S.; Tanaka, M.; Kishimura, H. Antioxidative activity of Mungoong, an extract paste, from the cephalothorax of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Food Chem. 2008, 106, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Benzie, I.F.; Strain, J.J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Cheng, F.-Y.; Wan, T.C.; Liu, Y.T.; Chen, C.M.; Lin, L.C.; Sakata, R. Determination of angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitory peptides in chicken leg bone protein hydrolysate with alcalase. Anim. Sci. J. 2009, 80, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Raikos, V.; Campbell, L.; Euston, S.R. Effects of sucrose and sodium chloride on foaming properties of egg white proteins. Food Res. Int. 2007, 40, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Davis, J.P.; Foegeding, E.A.; Hansen, F.K. Electrostatic effects on the yield stress of whey protein isolate foams. Coll. Surf. B Biointerfaces 2004, 34, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shimofuji, S.; Ohtani, K.; Matsui, M. The Role of Ovalbumin in the Stability of Whipped Egg White Prepared in Copper Bowl. J. Cook. Sci. Jpn. 2013, 46, 335–342. [Google Scholar]
  30. Dickinson, E. Mixed biopolymers at interfaces: Competitive adsorption and multilayer structures. Food Hydrocoll. 2011, 25, 1966–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Duygu, A.; Doğan, M. The influence of ultrasound on the stability of dairy-based, emulsifier-free emulsions: Rheological and morphological aspect. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2018, 244, 409–421. [Google Scholar]
  32. Patel, A.; Longmore, N.; Mohanan, A.; Ghosh, S. Salt and pH-Induced Attractive Interactions on the Rheology of Food Protein-Stabilized Nanoemulsions. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 11791–11800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Pramualkijja, T.; Pirak, T.; Kerdsup, P. Effect of salt, rice bran oil and malva nut gum on chemical, physical and physico-chemical properties of beef salt e Soluble protein and its application in low fat salami. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 53, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Raikos, V.; Campbell, L.; Euston, S.R. Rheology and texture of hen’s egg protein heat-set gels as affected by pH and the addition of sugar and/or salt. Food Hydrocoll. 2007, 21, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tang, Q.; Munro, P.A.; Mccathy, O.J. Rheology of whey protein concentrate solutions as a function of concentration, temperature, pH and salt concentration. J. Dairy Res. 1993, 60, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. El-Shibiny, S.; Farrag, A.F.; El-Garawany, G.; Assem, F.M. Rheological and Functional Properties of Whey Protein Concentrate and β-Lactoglobulin and α-Lactalbumin Rich Fractions. Int. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 2, 196–206. [Google Scholar]
  37. Holt, D.L.; Watson, M.A.; Dill, C.W.; Alford, E.S.; Edwards, R.L.; Diehl, K.C.; Gardner, F.A. Correlation of the Rheological Behavior of Egg Albumen to Temperature, pH, and NaCl Concentration. J. Food Sci. 1984, 49, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Loveday, S.M.; Sawyer, L. β-Lactoglobulin: Nomenclature, Structure, and Function. In Reference Module in Food Science; SciTech Connect: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  39. Roche, M.; Rondeau, P.; Singh, N.R.; Tarnus, E.; Bourdon, E. The antioxidant properties of serum albumin. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582, 1783–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ambigaipalan, P.; Al-Khalifa, A.S.; Shahidi, F. Antioxidant and angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activities of date seed protein hydrolysates prepared using Alcalase, Flavourzyme and Thermolysin. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 1125–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yousr, M.; Howell, N. Antioxidant and ACE Inhibitory Bioactive Peptides Purified from Egg Yolk Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 29161–29178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chalamaiah, M.; Tummala, J.; Diwan, P.D. Nutritional composition, ACE-inhibitory, and metal chelating properties of rohu (Labeo rohita) egg protein hydrolysate produced by Alcalase. Int. Food Res. J. 2016, 23, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar]
  43. Onuh, J.O.; Girgih, A.T.; Aluko, R.E.; Aliani, M. In vitro antioxidant properties of chicken skin enzymatic protein hydrolysates and membrane fractions. Food Chem. 2014, 150, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Moosmann, B.; Behl, C. Secretory Peptide Hormones Are Biochemical Antioxidants: Structure-Activity Relationship. Mol. Pharm. 2002, 61, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Tunieva, E.K.; Kotenkova, E.A. The Study on Effect of Sodium Chloride on the Antioxidant Activity of Meet. Foods Raw Mater. 2017, 5, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, X.; Tume, R.K.; Xu, X.; Zhou, G. Solubilization of myofibrillar proteins in water or low ionic strength media: Classical techniques, basic principles, and novel functionalities. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 3260–3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mirzaei, M.; Mirdamadi, S.; Ehsani, M.R.; Aminlari, M.; Hosseini, E. Purification and identification of antioxidant and ACE-inhibitory peptide from Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein hydrolysate. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 19, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wu, Q.; Du, J.; Jia, J.; Kuang, C. Production of ACE inhibitory peptides from sweet sorghum grain protein using alcalase: Hydrolysis kinetic, purification and molecular docking study. Food Chem. 2016, 199, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Foaming capacity (A) and foaming stability (B) of egg white (E) and whey protein (W) mixed with hydrolysate (H) from chicken trachea (0, 0.25, and 0.5%) and sodium chloride (S; 0 and 1.5%). The abbreviation of all treatments was shown in Table 1. Error bars on each bar graph indicated the standard deviation (SD) of the mean calculated for each treatment. The lowercase letters on top of each bar indicate the significance of the results. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different. Those with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Foaming capacity (A) and foaming stability (B) of egg white (E) and whey protein (W) mixed with hydrolysate (H) from chicken trachea (0, 0.25, and 0.5%) and sodium chloride (S; 0 and 1.5%). The abbreviation of all treatments was shown in Table 1. Error bars on each bar graph indicated the standard deviation (SD) of the mean calculated for each treatment. The lowercase letters on top of each bar indicate the significance of the results. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different. Those with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Sustainability 14 16782 g001
Figure 2. Emulsifying activity index (A) and emulsion stability index (B) of egg white (E) and whey protein (W) mixed with hydrolysate (H) from chicken trachea (0, 0.25, and 0.5%) and sodium chloride (S; 0 and 1.5%). The abbreviation of all treatments was shown in Table 1. Error bars on each bar graph indicated the standard deviation (SD) of the mean calculated for each treatment. The lowercase letters on top of each bar indicate the significance of the results. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different. Those with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Emulsifying activity index (A) and emulsion stability index (B) of egg white (E) and whey protein (W) mixed with hydrolysate (H) from chicken trachea (0, 0.25, and 0.5%) and sodium chloride (S; 0 and 1.5%). The abbreviation of all treatments was shown in Table 1. Error bars on each bar graph indicated the standard deviation (SD) of the mean calculated for each treatment. The lowercase letters on top of each bar indicate the significance of the results. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different. Those with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Sustainability 14 16782 g002
Figure 3. Elastic modulus (G) from amplitude sweep test of egg white (E) and whey protein (W) mixed with hydrolysate (H) from chicken trachea (0, 0.25, and 0.5%) and sodium chloride (S; 0 and 1.5%). The abbreviation of all treatments was shown in Table 1. Measurements at 4 °C.
Figure 3. Elastic modulus (G) from amplitude sweep test of egg white (E) and whey protein (W) mixed with hydrolysate (H) from chicken trachea (0, 0.25, and 0.5%) and sodium chloride (S; 0 and 1.5%). The abbreviation of all treatments was shown in Table 1. Measurements at 4 °C.
Sustainability 14 16782 g003
Figure 4. Elastic modulus (G) from amplitude sweep test of egg white (E) and whey protein (W) mixed with hydrolysate (H) from chicken trachea (0, 0.25, and 0.5%) and sodium chloride (S; 0 and 1.5%). The abbreviation of all treatments was shown in Table 1.
Figure 4. Elastic modulus (G) from amplitude sweep test of egg white (E) and whey protein (W) mixed with hydrolysate (H) from chicken trachea (0, 0.25, and 0.5%) and sodium chloride (S; 0 and 1.5%). The abbreviation of all treatments was shown in Table 1.
Sustainability 14 16782 g004
Figure 5. Antioxidant ability analyzed based on DPPH assay (A), ABTS assay (B), and FRAP assay (C) of egg white (E) and whey protein (W) mixed with hydrolysate (H) from chicken trachea (0, 0.25, and 0.5%) and sodium chloride (S; 0 and 1.5%). The abbreviation of all treatments was shown in Table 1. Error bars on each bar graph indicated the standard deviation (SD) of the mean calculated for each treatment. The lowercase letters on top of each bar indicate the significance of the results. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different. Those with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Antioxidant ability analyzed based on DPPH assay (A), ABTS assay (B), and FRAP assay (C) of egg white (E) and whey protein (W) mixed with hydrolysate (H) from chicken trachea (0, 0.25, and 0.5%) and sodium chloride (S; 0 and 1.5%). The abbreviation of all treatments was shown in Table 1. Error bars on each bar graph indicated the standard deviation (SD) of the mean calculated for each treatment. The lowercase letters on top of each bar indicate the significance of the results. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different. Those with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Sustainability 14 16782 g005
Figure 6. ACE inhibitor (IC50) of egg white (E) and whey protein (W) mixed with hydrolysate (H) from chicken trachea (0 and 0.5%) and sodium chloride (S; 0 and 1.5%). The abbreviation of all treatments was shown in Table 1. Error bars on each bar graph indicated the standard deviation (SD) of the mean calculated for each treatment. The lowercase letters on top of each bar indicate the significance of the results. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different. Those with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 6. ACE inhibitor (IC50) of egg white (E) and whey protein (W) mixed with hydrolysate (H) from chicken trachea (0 and 0.5%) and sodium chloride (S; 0 and 1.5%). The abbreviation of all treatments was shown in Table 1. Error bars on each bar graph indicated the standard deviation (SD) of the mean calculated for each treatment. The lowercase letters on top of each bar indicate the significance of the results. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different. Those with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Sustainability 14 16782 g006
Table 1. Formulations of protein mixtures containing chicken trachea hydrolysate (H), egg white protein isolates (E) or whey protein isolates (W), and sodium chloride (S). The protein concentration of E and W was fixed at 10% (w/v), with various levels of hydrolysate.
Table 1. Formulations of protein mixtures containing chicken trachea hydrolysate (H), egg white protein isolates (E) or whey protein isolates (W), and sodium chloride (S). The protein concentration of E and W was fixed at 10% (w/v), with various levels of hydrolysate.
TreatmentChicken Protein Hydrolysate (%)Sodium Chloride (%)
E00
E/0.25 H0.250
E/0.50 H0.500
E/1.5 S01.5
E/0.25 H/1.5 S0.251.5
E/0.50 H/1.5 S0.501.5
W00
W/0.25 H0.250
W/0.50 H0.500
W/1.5 S01.5
W/0.25 H/1.5 S0.251.5
W/0.50 H/1.5 S0.501.5
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pramualkijja, T.; Pirak, T.; Euston, S.R. Functional Properties of Egg White Protein and Whey Protein in the Presence of Bioactive Chicken Trachea Hydrolysate and Sodium Chloride. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416782

AMA Style

Pramualkijja T, Pirak T, Euston SR. Functional Properties of Egg White Protein and Whey Protein in the Presence of Bioactive Chicken Trachea Hydrolysate and Sodium Chloride. Sustainability. 2022; 14(24):16782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416782

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pramualkijja, Teeda, Tantawan Pirak, and Stephen Robert Euston. 2022. "Functional Properties of Egg White Protein and Whey Protein in the Presence of Bioactive Chicken Trachea Hydrolysate and Sodium Chloride" Sustainability 14, no. 24: 16782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416782

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop