Next Article in Journal
Teachers’ Satisfaction, Role, and Digital Literacy during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Integrated Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Method to Analyze Green Management Practice in Hospitality Industry in the Sultanate of Oman
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Trend Analysis of Mainstreaming Flood Risk Reduction into Spatial Planning in Thailand

by
Alita Chaladdee
1,*,
Sohee Minsun Kim
1,
Vilas Nitivattananon
1,
Indrajit Pal
1,
Joyashree Roy
2,3 and
Thongchai Roachanakanan
4
1
Department of Development and Sustainability, School of Environment, Resources and Development, AIT, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
2
Department of Energy, Environment and Climate, School of Environment, Resources and Development, AIT, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
3
Department of Economics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India
4
Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning, Ministry of Interior, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(3), 1119; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031119
Submission received: 25 November 2021 / Revised: 11 January 2022 / Accepted: 11 January 2022 / Published: 19 January 2022

Abstract

Mainstreaming flood risk reduction into spatial planning (MFRRSP) recognizes the urgent need for sustainable human settlement planning. Despite official recognition of MFRRSP in Thailand, repetitive damage from floods demonstrates gaps in concept and implementation. This paper examines the transition and challenges of flood risk reduction (FRR) practices in the spatial planning (SP) of the Bangkok and Sing Buri provinces of Thailand. Content analysis through computer-aided qualitative data analysis software (CAQDS) and in-depth interviews provide the evidence for the study. Twenty-two codes under seven assessments were extracted from the MFRRSP guidelines of international organizations. It was found that FRR was more mainstream in Thailand’s SP. The code in the next Sing Buri and Bangkok Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) was mentioned in 202.06% and 112.70% of the existing CLUP. The assessment area that deserves more attention is FRR preparedness and stakeholder participation, which only 0.011% and 0.035% mention. Two implementation problems are identified. Firstly, no emergency management deals with using land-use management methods. Secondly, FRR regulations limiting the type, density, and design have been reduced, as seen in the next draft of Bangkok CLUP that reduces the floodway in specific districts to be a residential land type. This specific study for Thailand shows how the method can be used in any local context for any country to understand how official planning documents evolve and adapt to disaster preparedness.
Keywords: flood disaster; flood risk reduction; mainstreaming; spatial planning; Thailand flood disaster; flood risk reduction; mainstreaming; spatial planning; Thailand

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chaladdee, A.; Kim, S.M.; Nitivattananon, V.; Pal, I.; Roy, J.; Roachanakanan, T. Trend Analysis of Mainstreaming Flood Risk Reduction into Spatial Planning in Thailand. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031119

AMA Style

Chaladdee A, Kim SM, Nitivattananon V, Pal I, Roy J, Roachanakanan T. Trend Analysis of Mainstreaming Flood Risk Reduction into Spatial Planning in Thailand. Sustainability. 2022; 14(3):1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031119

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chaladdee, Alita, Sohee Minsun Kim, Vilas Nitivattananon, Indrajit Pal, Joyashree Roy, and Thongchai Roachanakanan. 2022. "Trend Analysis of Mainstreaming Flood Risk Reduction into Spatial Planning in Thailand" Sustainability 14, no. 3: 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031119

APA Style

Chaladdee, A., Kim, S. M., Nitivattananon, V., Pal, I., Roy, J., & Roachanakanan, T. (2022). Trend Analysis of Mainstreaming Flood Risk Reduction into Spatial Planning in Thailand. Sustainability, 14(3), 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031119

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop