Development and Simulation of Cyberdisaster Situation Awareness Models
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The paper investigates an interesting topic and the focus on the Disaster Management can provide multiple interesting reflections for sustainability science. Despite this, at the state the paper complitelly understimate the domain of sustainability and the multiple contributions provided in order to define possible managerial approaches for supporting sustainable development also in case of disasters. Please try to link proposed reflections to the main topic of the journal. In such a direction, consider the following references among the others:
- Calabrese, A., Castaldi, C., Forte, G., & Levialdi, N. G. (2018). Sustainability-oriented service innovation: An emerging research field. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 533-548.
- Caputo, F. (2020). Towards a holistic view of corporate social responsibility. The antecedent role of information asymmetry and cognitive distance. Kybernetes, 50(3), 639-655.
- Caputo, F., Buhnova, B., & Walletzký, L. (2018). Investigating the role of smartness for sustainability: Insights from the Smart Grid domain. Sustainability Science, 13(5), 1299-1309.
- Caputo, F., Carrubbo, L., & Sarno, D. (2018). The influence of cognitive dimensions on the consumer-SME relationship: a sustainability-oriented view. Sustainability, 10(9), 3238.
- Caputo, F., Del Giudice, M., Papa, A., & Scuotto, V. (2020). From sustainability coercion to social engagement: the turning role of corporate social responsibility. From sustainability coercion to social engagement: the turning role of corporate social responsibility, 15-31
- Caputo, F., Perano, M., & Mamuti, A. (2017). A macro-level view of tourism sector: between smartness and sustainability. Enlightening Tourism. A Pathmaking Journal, 7(1), 36-61
- Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability‐oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490-506.
- Hansen, E. G., Grosse-Dunker, F., & Reichwald, R. (2009). Sustainability innovation cube—a framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(04), 683-713.
- Ljovkina, A. O., Dusseault, D. L., Zaharova, O. V., & Klochkov, Y. (2019). Managing innovation resources in accordance with sustainable development ethics: Typological analysis. Resources, 8(2), 82.
- Pogutz, S., & Winn, M. I. (2016). Cultivating ecological knowledge for corporate sustainability: Barilla's innovative approach to sustainable farming. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(6), 435-448.
- Trischler, J., Johnson, M., & Kristensson, P. (2020). A service ecosystem perspective on the diffusion of sustainability-oriented user innovations. Journal of Business Research, 116, 552-560.
- Varadarajan, R. (2017). Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(1), 14-36.
Author Response
Original Manuscript ID: sustainability-1510004
Original Article Title: “Risk Development and Simulation of Disaster Situation Awareness Models”
To: MDPI Sustainability Editor
Re: Response to reviewers
Dear Editor,
Thank you for the opportunity and suggestions given to us, so that we can improve the manuscript better. The comments or improvements to our manuscripts point by point are as follows (a) the yellow manuscript is a change, either an addition or improvement to the manuscript and (b) a clean updated manuscript without highlighting (PDF of the main document).
In the new manuscript, we double-checked the English language and have made careful revisions to ensure that the paper is clearer and easier for readers to follow. Following your suggestions, the manuscript has been edited by Scribendi. Please see the attachment.
We request that the same reviewers be asked to review this revised manuscript.
Thank you very much for your kind attention.
Best regards,
Nungky Awang Chandra, et al.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The topic of the publication is very topical, however, the novelty of the achieved results is difficult to evaluate. I suggest preparing a more detailed literature review to verify the novelty content. I also suggest creating a new chapter to outline future research directions. The summary of the dissertation needs to be revised, as the authors do not highlight their own results in sufficient depth. The finished material contains a lot of typographical errors and does not meet the formal requirements. It is also necessary to unify the style of tables and formulas.
Author Response
Original Manuscript ID: sustainability-1510004
Original Article Title: “Risk Development and Simulation of Disaster Situation Awareness Models”
To: MDPI Sustainability Editor
Re: Response to reviewers
Dear Editor,
Thank you for the opportunity and suggestions given to us, so that we can improve the manuscript better. The comments or improvements to our manuscripts point by point are as follows (a) the yellow manuscript is a change, either an addition or improvement to the manuscript and (b) a clean updated manuscript without highlighting (PDF of the main document).
In the new manuscript, we double-checked the English language and have made careful revisions to ensure that the paper is clearer and easier for readers to follow. Following your suggestions, the manuscript has been edited by Scribendi.
We request that the same reviewers be asked to review this revised manuscript.
Thank you very much for your attention.
Best regards,
Nungky Awang Chandra, et al.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
After the review, the paper can be now considered for the publication.
Reviewer 2 Report
I accept the modified paper in its current form.
