Next Article in Journal
Manufacturing and Management Paradigms, Methods and Tools for Sustainable Industry 4.0-Oriented Manufacturing Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Developing a New Bursting Liability Index Based on Energy Evolution for Coal under Different Loading Rates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Systematic Review of Sustainable Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Supply Chains

by
Ömer Özgür Tort
1,2,*,
Özalp Vayvay
3 and
Emine Çobanoğlu
3
1
Migros Ticaret A.Ş., Istanbul 34758, Turkey
2
Engineering Faculty, Marmara University, Istanbul 34854, Turkey
3
Faculty of Business, Marmara University, Istanbul 34180, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(3), 1573; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031573
Submission received: 9 December 2021 / Revised: 5 January 2022 / Accepted: 9 January 2022 / Published: 28 January 2022

Abstract

:
Fresh fruit and vegetables are crucial for human health. Their fibrous structure and high nutritional value are essential for people’s well-being. This study aims to provide a review of the current state of knowledge and practices regarding fresh fruit and vegetable supply chains (FFVSC). The reviewed papers are divided into categories according to their findings, research purposes, tools and messages used. Our objective is to guide both academics and practitioners by pointing out significant streams of research with respect to these categories. For a better understanding, these subgroups are essentially based on their common research purpose, and the tools and methods they adopted are explained. Therefore, this study sheds light on research related to FFVSCs for those who are new to this area or planning to conduct in-depth research on directions suggested by studies in this area. The related literature was classified into eight categories: namely, (1) value chain indicators of FFVSCs, (2) food-related problems/postharvest losses along FFVSCs, (3) roles of parties involved in the FFV value chain, (4) review papers, (5) technological trends in FFVSCs, (6) packaging issues of FFVSCs, (7) logistics solutions of FFVSCs, and (8) sustainable FFVSCs. Details on the tools and methods employed in these studies are summarized in Appendix B. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the related literature lacks a comprehensive review that investigates different aspects of FFVVCs in detail. Thus, this study contributes towards a better understanding of the related literature and can be used as a guide for future studies.

1. Introduction

Fresh fruit and vegetables (FFVs) are necessary for a healthy diet due to their high nutritional value and fibrous structure [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) announced that the majority of deaths per year worldwide are related to the lack of fruit and vegetable consumption [2]. This highlights the significance of these foods. In addition, the handling and preservation of fresh fruits and vegetables from farm to fork is another concern along the supply chain (SC) to maintain food quality and eliminate harvest losses. Lack of attention, especially during processing and storing, results in inefficient management of the supply chain and, thus, causes harvests to be lost [3].
The SC, which basically covers all the steps in production or services starting from the raw material until the end product reaches the final customer, is a result of strategic thinking in the industry. The objective of this concept is to govern enterprise activity in an efficient way [4].
The fresh fruit and vegetable supply chain (FFVSC) has a broad context and a wide impact area. Food safety, food waste, the freshness of food, production processes, the logistic activities of goods, and managerial competence among the actors are some areas that could be improved to enhance the chain. Furthermore, food integrity is studied by examining data and information sharing among the actors in the SC, as described in [5]. In addition, the effect of social media and electronic word of mouth on new business approaches, such as e-commerce enterprises and startups, are considered, as examined in [6]. Therefore, we believe that this FFVSC literature review should serve both researchers and practitioners.
Changes in customer requirements result in the formation of food value chains. Customer preferences cause these to evolve into technology-enabled food value chains [7]. Fresh food supply chains are facing rapid changes in terms of digitalization in order to meet customer demands and compete effectively in the market. There are some steps suggested by Deloitte [8] for organizations to improve the future of their food value chains: namely, (1) applying lean methods to current operations, (2) improving legacy systems, (3) testing and unifying digital technologies, (4) structuring data and analytic capabilities, and (5) sustaining a culture of freshness.
The statements of institutions and organizations are essential for fresh food value chains to transform. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has a vision to make food and agriculture sustainable so that nutritious food can be accessible for everybody; in doing so, natural resources should continue to be managed to be able to sustain ecosystem functions [9]. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) states that agricultural activities are rapidly changing into global food value chains and this results in some issues at the production, transformation and delivery stages [10].
In recent years, a rise in social awareness regarding the significance of food value chains has been observed. For instance, recent contributions by international organizations for the improvement of FFVSCs and on the food value chain issue include the following:
  • contributions by international organizations to the literature to enrich the food value chain as a concept in academia [11,12];
  • the Declaration of Sustainable Development Goals (SGDs) by the United Nations (UN) and solutions suggested by the UN to overcome current global problems, such as poverty and hunger [13]. In addition, the UN has announced 2021 as the International Year of Fruits and Vegetables [14].
This study proceeds as follows: In Section 2, we briefly explain the materials and methods used. In Section 3, the FFVSC papers considered are first classified into eight categories based on their relevance and content and then they are explained in detail. An overview of these categories is provided in Figure A1 as a thematic map in Appendix A, and the details regarding the tools and methods employed in the papers presented in this literature review are displayed in Table A1, Table A2, Table A3, Table A4, Table A5, Table A6, Table A7 and Table A8 in Appendix B. In Section 4, we summarize the results obtained from the literature reviewed. Subsequently, a conclusion is provided in Section 4, addressing possible avenues for future research.

2. Materials and Method

Using the Scopus database, this study surveyed the literature on fresh fruit and vegetable supply chains with a holistic approach. An in-depth investigation of FFVSCs revealed that the relevant literature lacks a comprehensive review of SC activities for this specific harvest type. The main objective of this paper is to fill this research gap and introduce FFVSC systems to the reader from the ground up.
The research methodology of this paper is as follows:
  •  Using Scopus to gain statistical information about SC and FFVSC literature;
  •  Scanning FFVSC literature by reading the abstracts, findings and concluding remarks, to separate and address only the appropriate papers;
  •  Reviewing all parts of remaining papers after elimination and examining their research purposes, tools and methods used;
  •  Plotting the data of published papers on graphs to create a visual overview;
  •  Creating a thematic map of the research areas of the papers, which will help to form the categories, and also drawing a literature matrix; and
  •  Concluding remarks and future directions.
First, to assess the importance of SC as a topic, the statistics for the SC literature were examined. The keyword “supply chain” was initially searched in the title and then keywords from all the identified papers available in the Scopus database were used. A total of 38,170 papers published between the years 2000 and 2020 were found. A line graph displaying the number of articles by year is shown in Figure 1. It is apparent that there has been an increasing interest in the topic and that increase in the number of documents from 2017 to 2020 has been marked.
Subsequently, articles focusing on the FFVSC and containing the phrase “supply chain” in their title and as one of their keywords, and the phrase “fresh fruits and vegetables” in all their fields were searched in the Scopus database. This search returned a total of 158 studies which were further scanned to identify the studies that best served the aim of this review. A total of 118 articles remained after this refinement; this is shown in a line chart organized by year in Figure 2. The graph shows that, following some fluctuations in the early 2000s, there has been a gradual increase in the number of studies that met the search criteria, starting in the year 2016.
Lastly, the number of articles by journal is displayed in Figure 3. For the first 13 journals, those containing more articles than the others, are shown in this figure. Each of the other journals contained only one paper; therefore, they are not presented at this point to provide a clear and easy-to-understand illustration.
FFVSCs are of great significance since the characteristics of harvests and the supply of fresh fruits and vegetables makes the topic challenging; therefore, this is an interesting problem to be tackled by both academics and practitioners.
This study essentially sought to find answers to two questions: “What are the main streams of research in the FFVSC literature?” and “What are the most promising solution approaches?” The questions, objectives and methods used were aligned with the PRISMA 2020 checklist [15]. The overall objective was to provide enough information to the reader to comprehend the main aspects of SC activities for one of the basic food categories. Even though the FFVSC literature was found to be rich, it lacks a comprehensive survey that compiles various studies approaching the topic from different angles. Hence, this study contributes to the existing literature, filling this research gap. For this purpose, we explored studies available in the Scopus database that were published between 2000 and 2020. The initial search resulted in a total of 158 studies, but an additional evaluation was required since there were duplications and some of the papers did not focus on FFVSCs. After the necessary eliminations and the examination of case studies (if there were any), experimental studies were reviewed. The purpose was to concentrate on various processes in the FFVSCs, where the harvest was handled fresh along the chain. A total of 118 papers, which were believed to provide readers with different views on the topic, were ultimately retained.
VOSviewer provides text mining functionality to build and visualize co-occurrence networks based on keywords obtained from the literature [16]. Therefore, it was employed to display the data of surveyed papers to create a visual overview. To do so, a map based on bibliometric data retrieved form SCOPUS was created and a co-occurrence analysis was performed using a full counting method. Finally, keywords that were meaningless were eliminated, such as “need” and “gap”.

3. Literature Review

In this section, 118 scientific articles that were reviewed within the context of this study are classified based on their research topics. A total of eight main categories, namely, value chain indicators of FFVSVs, food/postharvest loss-related problems along FFVSCs, the role of parties involved in the FFV value chain, review papers, technological trends in FFVSCs, packaging issues of FFVSCs, logistics solutions of FFVSCs, and sustainable FFVSCs, are presented. The categories and the number of articles each of them contains are given in Table 1.
The 35 studies falling into Section 3.1 examine the key performance indicators (KPIs) of supply chain (SC) processes. Issues related to performance, price, policy making, and others observed here are explained in detail in Section 3.1. Section 3.2 involves 29 studies that attempt to solve food-related problems, such as low quality, food waste, postharvest loss, the freshness of food, etc. Section 3.3 consists of fourteen studies seeking an answer to questions regarding the role of different parties in the system. A generic SC consists of the producer, wholesaler, retailer and consumer. Here in this category, SC-related problems are evaluated from the perspective of an actor. The articles in Section 3.1 examine FFVSC problems with a holistic approach; in contrast to this, the articles in Section 3.3 consider the problems from one party’s perspective. For instance, the system is approached from a wholesaler’s point of view in Section 3.3. Section 3.4 contains thirteen review articles; most of them fail to examine the SC of fresh fruits and vegetables using a multi-perspective approach. Although such research examines the related literature focusing on a particular aspect, such as location, product, or problem-specific concepts, we provide here a comprehensive overview of the topic considering its different aspects. Eight studies in Section 3.5 concentrate on solutions benefiting from technological trends and smart applications. As a key problem for fresh fruits and vegetables, studies in Section 3.6 tackle packaging issues. Six studies in Section 3.7 seek to address logistic solutions for SC activities. Any transportation and routing studies fall into this category. The focus of articles in Section 3.8 is to establish sustainable FFVSCs. The seven studies involved in this category consider the three pillars of sustainability (i.e., economic, environmental, and social), while considering the research questions proposed in the respective studies.
The studies presented in this paper are also visualized utilizing the VOSviewer. In Figure 4, the studies are displayed in terms of the frequency of the occurrence of keywords. For this network visualization, keywords which are meaningless were eliminated, such as “need” and “gap”. It can be seen that where keywords are located closer to each other that they form a circular network. Moreover, the figure demonstrates a cluster density based on occurrence by using random colors. For instance, the following keywords are mentioned at the top of the figure with a light blue color: “microbiology”, “bacterial count”, “food control”, and “food handling”. They clustered in the same color because they are used in the same studies together.
In Figure 5, an overlay visualization is shown in terms of the average number of publications per year. It is clear that the keywords shown in the figure are research areas that are substantially new. Light green and yellow colors are common, which means the studies were heavily published after 2015, according to the legend shown in the figure.
Categorized in eight groups, the studies mentioned above highlighting different aspects of the FFVSC are explained in detail in the following subsections.

3.1. Value Chain Indicators of FFVSCs

In this subsection, studies examining problems related to key performance indicators (KPIs) of the FFVSC are explained. Among these indicators, the performance of the whole chain, strategy, pricing, policy, marketing, and the relationships between different levels strongly stand out. A common purpose of these studies is to understand the current performance of the value chain through developing evaluation methodologies with the help of surveys and methods of analysis.
Wermund and Fearne [17] identified the major difficulties, competition, and marketing opportunities in the cherry SC in the UK. Hewett [18] introduced some challenges to overcome in SC management to avoid risky situations in the near future. Hingley [19] worked on a fresh produce SC in the UK aiming to bridge the gap between business-to-business (B2B) vertical SC channels. Maruyama and Hirogaki [20] generated a three-level SC model that examined the effects of vertical coordination on the output, prices, and the welfare of various parties. The authors piloted the designed method in a Japan-based organization and showed the benefits of a vertical contract framework when compared with spot market transactions. Mergenthaler et al. [21] predicted the demand parameters that had an impact on variations in the purchase of fresh fruits and vegetables using household survey data for Vietnam’s two major cities, Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. The results showed that the purchase of fresh fruits and vegetables was dependent on household expenditure.
Clements et al. [22] studied two cases of fresh produce SCs on the South Island of New Zealand. They examined the linkages in the SC functions within their framework and showed that the information exchange structure between parties had the biggest impact on the character of the relationship. Feng et al. [23] established a decision support system using price management and coefficient of variation methods. Zúñiga-Arias et al. [24] performed structured interviews and a laboratory analysis for the case of the mango SC of Costa Rica to provide a framework to describe managerial activities and their impact on product quality. Cadilhon et al. [25] worked on a tomato and butterhead lettuce SC in Ho Chi Minh City and defined the dominant factors in B2B relationships. Stringer et al. [26] performed a conjoint analysis on vegetable processors from China. The results of this study indicated the importance of alternative SC characteristics, such as the sizing of producers and quality certification.
King et al. [27] investigated 15 cases with different food categories, including fruits and vegetables, to discover the determinants of local food SCs. Structure and size factors were identified as essential SC performance indicators for local markets to compete with mainstream markets. Based on a case study in four European countries, namely, The Netherlands, Spain, Poland, and Greece, Verdouw et al. [28] proposed a reference model for demand-driven fruit SCs in which business processes were designed in a way to establish a clear information basis between information systems and managers. Jiao and Shen [29] analyzed the market share, price and profit in sealed SCs. Certain quantitative relationships between market share, equilibrium price and equilibrium profit were defined. Samuel et al. [30] compared SC models with various examples around the world to provide insights into their evolution, procurement and marketing strategies. The relationships between these SCs were also investigated in this study.
Fizzanty et al. [31] studied two cases in the mango industry of Indonesia to determine the problems that occur in the SCs of a developing country. The necessity of commitment among the stakeholders and decreasing the opposition of the system environment were learned using a complex adaptive systems (CAS) perspective, sustainability–acceptability–feasibility–efficiency (SAFE) framework, and cross-case analysis. Cai et al. [32] focused on pricing issues when outsourcing logistic activities. The effect of third-party logistics on SC performance was found to be significant, and an incentive scheme was proposed. Kundu and Kar [33] worked on a physical distribution model. Using the traditional retail model and the reliance value chain business model, the authors developed a revised model to establish a growth strategy for building a value chain. Götz et al. [34] considered competitiveness and price transmission in the case of Israeli grapefruit growers. The seasonal losses of citrus growers were found to stem from asymmetric price transmission.
Bahinipati [35] focused on routine SC activities, namely, business planning, supply and demand management, inventory, transportation and logistics. Information and communication technologies (ICT) were referred to as one of the crucial needs to ensure customer satisfaction. Conducting open-ended interviews with banana traders in Lampung Province, Sumatra Island and Banten, Java Island, Obeth et al. [36] identified the risks the smallholders considered when joining modern SCs. The perceived risk, additional workloads and current state of comfort were indicated as factors affecting why smallholders were not willing to join modern SCs. Chen et al. [37] evaluated system performance using optimization and colored Petri net methods. With the help of this evaluation, robust strategies to sustain the system performance of agricultural SCs were found. Aysoy et al. [38] employed quasi-experimental methods to display policy reforms in the wholesale market and showed that the reforms resulted in a decrease in prices.
Karyani et al. [39] concentrated on the financing problems of mango farmers in West Java and employed value stream mapping and descriptive analysis. The authors identified the significant pillars of the financing scheme as being contracts and agreements and the security of credits, which were provided by the guarantor institution. Gamboa et al. [40] evaluated the performance of three organic tomato SCs in Spanish and Catalan contexts. Trade-offs due to the integrated assessments were identified to characterize the performance of food SCs. Webb [41] examined changes in consumer culture and showed that the critical points in SCs shifted from the processor/retailer to the retailer/consumer boundary. Negi and Anand [42] analyzed the case of a tomato SC in India and identified labor charges and operational factors as the two most important factors leading to inefficiency in the SC.
Siddh et al. [43] evaluated perishable food supply chain quality (PFSCQ) and presented a research model to ensure sustainable organizational performance that had an impact on PFSCQ. The authors analyzed the Indian food industry to create a performance measure model using various tools and methods, such as survey study, structural equation modeling (SEM), and exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation. The proposed model revealed that producer performance had a positive impact on supplier performance, processor performance, and distributor performance. Shashi et al. [44] studied the overall food supply chain performance (FSCP) and in what way it is dependent on the performance of partners in a sustainable and energy-efficient SC. For this reason, a five-stage performance measurement model is presented. Arshinder and Balaji [45] investigated a case in an Indian metropolitan city to understand the difficulties in FFVSCs. The study found that excursive margins determined by SC agents caused double marginalization at each interface of the SC.
Concerning strategy, Nakandala and Lau [46] worked on 12 urban local fresh food retailers in Sydney and identified the dominant strategies in different parts of the SC. For time efficiency in downstream activities, maximizing the product’s freshness and taste were the predominant strategies. Cao and Mohiuddin [47] investigated price formation using the elastic model of price conduction and Granger causality analysis. Based on the findings, it was concluded that the price of fresh and raw vegetables is determined in the wholesale market. Negi and Anand [48] examined the wholesale stage of a mango SC in India using factor analysis. Various factors affecting cost, lead time and quality and, therefore, causing inefficiency in the system, were eventually identified. Pavez et al. [49] performed their study on contracts chosen during the exportation of Chilean apples. The results of the economic analysis conducted within the context of this study revealed that free consignment and minimum guaranteed arrangements were preferred by the exporters of Chilean apples when they exported to a country with a safe business environment. Nedumaran et al. [50] proposed an SC model to connect farmers directly and efficiently with customers. The model also has as an aim to reduce postharvest losses. In addition, a market information system is implemented within the proposed SC model to balance the information asymmetry along the FFVSC in India. Waqas et al. [51] studied SC risks which affect agropreneurs of fresh fruits and vegetables in Malaysia; five SC risks are determined (supply, process, demand, environmental and financial risks) and the level of these risks are measured.
Section 3.1 provided details on the FFVSC studies that essentially focus on the managerial aspects of the main topic. Most of these studies conducted surveys and questionnaires to collect data and analyze cases. With the help of studies concerning the managerial aspect of FFVSCs, new approaches for businesses to run in an efficient way are developed such that both the end customer and the internal customers along the food SC can benefit from the system. The ultimate aim of the studies categorized under Section 3.1 is to create a systematic approach to measure the current performance of the value/supply chain to improve it. There will be continuous demands placed on performance measurement systems because change is integral to the systems and will always be pertinent.

3.2. Food-Related Problems/Postharvest Losses along the FFVSC

Studies in Section 3.2 focus on food-related problems. The most frequent keywords that were encountered within this category included food quality, food waste, food loss, postharvest loss, and the freshness of food. The common goal of these papers is to develop a better value chain and address points where losses primarily occur with the use of statistical methods.
Digal [52] built a price asymmetry model based on food quality and performed a case study in the vegetable industry in the Southern Philippines. Various types of vegetables and their attributes with respect to the role of quality grades and standards are explained. Russell et al. [53] investigated the loss of vitamin C in cold SCs for fresh strawberries and found that there was a difference in vitamin C content between strawberry trials along the SC. Cai et al. [54] tracked efforts to keep perishable products fresh. Thus, the authors proposed a model to examine problems, such as order quantity, freshness level, and pricing. They stated that joint decisions taken by producers and distributers had a significant effect on the freshness of the product. Jacxsens et al. [55] performed comprehensive research on fresh-cut vegetables to analyze and assess the effects of climate change on food safety. For this purpose, a knowledge-based model was developed to prevent microbiological food safety risks at all stages of the SC. Another study on food safety that was conducted by Diez-Valcarce et al. [56] analyzed viruses in food SCs. The authors developed an amplification control to be employed in routine analyses of food viruses.
Li and Qiao [57] presented a preservation behavior decision-making model for the three parties of the SC, namely, farmers, wholesaler markets, and supermarkets. Performing a case study for the litchi SC, the authors concluded that actions to be taken to support preservation behavior depended on factors such as the relationship between price and the freshness of product, the preservation technology, and the circulation time. Jraisat and Sawalha [58] investigated the drivers of quality control operations in the FFVSC in Jordan using a case study approach. Thirteen determinants, including timely delivery, information quality, and commitment were defined as quality control factors. Macheka et al. [59] worked on the banana SC in Zimbabwe to understand the reasons for mechanical defects in the chain and specified the critical control points to minimize such effects. Based on their findings, handling activities can be acknowledged as one of the primary reasons for the mechanical defects.
Sivakumar and Wall [60] and Bill et al. [61] both provided a fruit-oriented quality management scheme for the postharvest SCs of papaya and avocado fruits, respectively. Since both of these fruits have high importance in terms of perishability, nutrition density, and price, quality issues during their exportation are critical. Different factors, such as temperature and storage, were identified as pivotal in the SCs of these cases. Blanke [62] studied apples to decrease their waste during SC activities and highlighted that reducing ethylene (the ripening gas) had an important effect on reducing food loss. Janssen et al. [63] also focused on ethylene gas, comparing three measurement systems (μGC, NDIR, and ETH1010) in the fruit SC. The authors claimed that this three-measurement system was cost-efficient and robust enough to be used in a container or a controlled atmosphere.
LeBlanc et al. [64] presented a database that contained the nationwide trade data for packaged ready-to-eat lettuce and leafy greens in Canada using an integrated simulation tool. The purpose of establishing this database was to sustain food safety and assess the risks that could be dangerous for public health due to contaminated food. The volumetric flow and the time–temperature data in this database can be used to assess the risks that occur along the SC. Hou et al. [65] worked on the Moroccan fruit and vegetable SC to meet the food safety standards that were introduced during the exportation of goods. This study employed principal component analysis and offered a linkage between food SC organization, target markets and commercialization channels. The results indicated that buyer-driven channels had more linkages between the upstream and downstream operators.
With the purpose of reducing food loss, Haoran et al. [66] used Fuzzy TOPSIS to optimize and improve the fresh agriculture product SCs. Zoellner et al. [67] performed several microbiological analyses to identify the safety risks. Accordingly, the authors studied the Roma tomato SC between Mexico and the USA. The study demonstrated that packaging houses and supermarkets were risky places in terms of food safety. Vegetable retail stores in four locations of Tamil Nadu, India were examined in Ramanathan et al. [68] to identify the main reasons for food waste in the SC. The authors reported that long travel distances, lack of labor, poor packing methods, damage due to handling during cleaning, sorting and grading should be primarily addressed. Gardas et al. [69] developed an interpretive structural model (ISM) to find the determinants of postharvest loss in the case of Maharashtra State, India. The authors identified the lack of linkages between organizations (e.g., industry, government institutions), the lack of technology/technique, and the lack of linkage between farmers and processing units, as critical factors.
Jacxsens et al. [70] performed a study aiming to analyze potential threats regarding food safety. Basil, strawberry, and butterhead lettuce were studied using a quantitative exposure model to forecast the number of pathogens on products. A probabilistic quantitative exposure assessment model was also developed with the purpose of examining the distribution of contaminated food. Orjuela-Castro and Adarme-Jaimes [71] concentrated on the SC dynamics of Colombia. The model constructed in this study was able to identify food loss due to life cycle or logistic activities in contrast to other models in the literature. Fabbri et al. [72] studied ultrasonic humidification and described its potential to reduce postharvest losses. It was found to be more likely to have a positive effect on the environment, including climate change, when compared to conventional SCs. Mercier and Uysal [73] trained a neural network using a heat transfer model to estimate temperature accurately so that food quality along the SC could be ensured. Zoellner et al. [74] simulated a model for the microbial dynamics of fresh products using a postharvest SC using the microbial travelers (PSCMT) tool. The tomato SC from Mexico to the USA was examined and a PSCMT model was proposed. Hernández-Rubio et al. [75] performed a study on Spanish and French intermediaries to determine the critical factors for food safety in the fruit and vegetable SC. It was found that big retailers were essential players to establish stricter safety controls.
Kelly et al. [76] studied each level of the SC focusing on food quality. For this purpose, the strawberry SC from Fancy Farms, USA was examined using instrumental color and texture analysis, ascorbic acid analysis, and two-way analysis of variance. The results showed that providing a constant optimum temperature through the SC was crucial to decrease food loss. Using the Delphi method and in-depth interviews, Diaz-Ruiz et al. [77] extracted 48 prevention methods which were the most effective measures to avoid food waste. These prevention measures were identified according to the diverse stages throughout the food SC: (1) primary production wholesalers, (2) industry, (3) distribution, (4) small stores, (5) consumers, (6) redistribution, and (7) along the food SC. Using mass flow analysis, Caldeira et al. [78] studied how to approximately forecast food waste in the EU for the main food groups that were highly consumed, namely, sugar beet, oil crops, potatoes, vegetables, fruit, cereals, meat, fish, dairy, and eggs, and found that cereals, fruits and vegetables were among the most wasted food groups. Zhang et al. [79] built a mixed integer linear programming model and structured an improved kernel search-based heuristic aiming to demonstrate the flows of perishable food while considering food quality. A food manufacturer in China was studied as the focal case and the proposed model was stated to have improved manufacturers’ profit by 10%. Xu et al. [80] established a step-by-step analytical framework that consists of (1) a data-driven quality degradation prediction model, (2) preliminary planning model, and (3) an optimized supply chain network design. With the help of this framework, quality degradation along the supply chain could be tracked; necessary measurements might be taken, for instance, to ensure initial environment conditions in delivery vehicles.
In Section 3.2, studies focusing on how to solve food-related problems in the FFVSC are explained. Various methods and analyses have been employed to overcome the issues in this field and most of the research investigated performed case studies to test their findings. With the help of these studies, problems caused by biological factors were attempted to be overcome with a view to prolonging the life of harvests. Every single decision affects the whole system in terms of food waste, quality, safety, etc.; for example, a new decision on replenishment may have an impact on the freshness of the fruits and vegetables. The joint effect of decisions can be taken into account before action. This issue is directly addressed in Section 3.3 as well.

3.3. Role of Parties Involved in the FFV Value Chain

In this subsection, studies concerning SC activities from a particular point of view, such as that of farmers, wholesalers, retailers, and cooperatives, are presented. The primary objective of these studies is to reveal the weaknesses of selected parties in the value chain by conducting questionnaires.
Hingley [81] examined the fresh produce market of the UK using the multi-case, multi-site method. The purpose of this study was to examine SC activities from the perspective of the suppliers for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This study found that the elimination of some SC members from the system is a current trend. The partnership approach was also noted as an essential determinant to help relationships within the system prosper. Louw et al. [82] focused on the South African agri-food chain and small producers in mass consumer markets. The study showed that there was a need for a multi-actor approach such that farmers were successfully involved in the SC. Arumugam et al. [83] focused on Malaysian farmers and employed factor analysis to identify the determinants that cause farmers to get involved in contract farming. The results revealed that market stability, access to marketing information and technology, the transfer of technology to improve farming practices, access to inputs, and indirect benefits were key factors considered by farmers.
Schipmann and Qaim [84] concentrated on farmers linked to modern SCs in developing countries. Thailand’s sweet pepper SC was chosen as a case study. In this study, the most important determinant for farmers was found to be trade with a familiar person due to trust issues. Sayın et al. [85] performed a SWOT analysis for wholesale markets and observed that producers earned less due to cutbacks and consumers paid more because of procurement and transfer expenses. Adopting a value-chain approach, Guarín [86] examined the Colombian market by conducting in-depth interviews with producers, wholesalers, urban consumers, and other key actors. In this study, smallholders’ heterogeneous production patterns were identified as a crucial factor, in contrast to their inefficient characteristics, since they supply food for poor local consumers at affordable prices.
Schuster and Maertens [87] studied the Peruvian asparagus export sector using fixed effects and generalized method of moments estimators. The importance of certification for vertical integration was explained by means of reduction in the share of produce from external producers. Wahyudin et al. [88] presented an agriculture SC model using a multi-integer linear programming approach to consider a corporate social responsibility (CSR) program, which aims to strengthen farmers by providing capital and funding. It was eventually found that CSR was beneficial for retailers for the sake of quality improvement. Jacob-John and Veerapa [89] focused on small- and medium-sized retailers to assess them in terms of ethics and responsibilities from the customer’s point of view. The study specified fairness as an important topic for suppliers and business customers. Michelson et al. [90] studied the case of Walmart China to examine intermediaries in the FFVSC of China. Food safety and quality were found to be critical issues in recent years according to the insights provided by the study. Devin and Richards [91] investigated the Australian FFVSC by conducting interviews with the purpose of decreasing food waste through CSR. The authors stated that strong government regulations and interventions were a necessity to ensure a responsible system. Elder [92] analyzed cooperatives in Nicaragua to discover their relationships with supermarkets. It was found that their performance depended on the type of interaction between farmers and the supermarkets. Salvia [93] used a global value chain perspective to tackle labor contracting. For this reason, in-depth interviews were conducted between 2015 and 2016 with key informants, mainly workers, labor contractors, farmers, labor organizations and unions, supermarket buying agents, and representatives of the agricultural organizations. This study identified the new strategies that the producers are adopting in order to resolve their problems. One of these strategies is to decentralize labor management to labor contractors. Gunarathna and Bandara [94] examined the intermediaries along the vegetable SC and described the main reasons for postharvest losses. The results showed that improper packaging, malpractices during transportation, careless handling, and unsuitable harvesting practices were the main reasons for postharvest losses.
Most of the studies highlighted above adopted a farmer- or a cooperative-oriented approach. This is mainly because these two parties face various challenges in SC activities. In an organized business/retail environment, small producers tackle problems, such as sustaining standard food quality and safety, ensuring cash flow, contracting with other stakeholders, reaching the global/bigger market channels, adopting technology, and lack of scientific information. Cooperatives also deal with problems, such as labor shortage, lack of technological employment, and operational obstacles. Therefore, the studies described have focused on challenges along the SC and sought to address the circumstances in which they arise. There are obviously some issues that need to be handled in the FFVSC. We may infer that the design of an SC, or the relationship between parties, are root causes of the majority of the problems that occurred. At the design stage, all parties in the chain should jointly discuss problems for efficient integration. Research reviewed in this category clearly defines the existing problems and proposes solution approaches for them.

3.4. Review Papers

In this subsection, review articles in the FFVSC are presented. These survey studies examined the literature considering only location, product or problem-specific issues of the chain and thus provide a relatively narrow perspective.
Rajurkar and Jain [95] reviewed food SC management by analyzing journal papers published between 1994 and 2009. Kong et al. [96] discussed auction-oriented logistics operations. Aung and Chang [97] focused on traceability studies and concluded that radio-frequency identification (RFID) and sensor-based tracking systems would be widely used in the near future. Sibomana et al. [98] examined postharvest handling within the context of the tomato SC of Sub-Saharan Africa and emphasized the importance of food loss as an avenue for future research. Siddh et al. [99] studied agri-fresh food supply chain quality (AFSCQ), considering research published between 1994 and mid-2016 and drew attention to the insufficiency of studies that have been conducted in developing countries. Routroy and Behera [100] provided a review on the agriculture supply chain (ASC) for the period 2000–2016 and concluded that inventory policy, demand forecasting, and ASC integration topics were not investigated thoroughly. Raak et al. [101] reviewed the literature on food loss and conducted interviews with 13 German companies. Saitone and Sexton [102] examined food chain evolution and evaluated its performance. Gharehgozli et al. [103] investigated the field of food transportation. Luo et al. [104] reviewed the agri-food supply chain management (ASCM) literature through a bibliometric analysis and a citation analysis. Corrado and Sala [105] investigated the topic of food waste. Lezoche et al. [106] examined the future of agri-food and asserted that adopting new technologies would improve various components of the system. Priyadarshi et al. [107] reviewed postharvest supply chain losses. Articles published between 1989 and 2020 were considered in this review paper.
The review papers mentioned here provide insights into the current state of the FFVSC literature, specify the gaps and point out possible avenues for future research. With the exception of one, all of these studies are somewhat limited in providing a review of the related literature since they tackle specific sub-problems of the FFVSCs. Moreover, the one excepted paper does not discuss recent trends.

3.5. Technological Trends in FFVSCs

In Section 3.5, studies that considered the formation of the FFVSC and presented technological solutions for the proposed problems are described. Their primary objective is to propose new technological solutions and applications for the improvement of fresh fruit and vegetable value chains by considering the point of contact (POC).
Duan et al. [108] conducted interviews and studied cases to characterize the usage of the Internet in fresh produce SCs involving SMEs. The proper training and education of agribusiness managers were stated as important factors in employing the Internet. Hu et al. [109] presented an intelligent decision support system built on genetic algorithms and neural networks to manage price risk. The proposed system helps detect the sources of risks easily and generates the most effective price risk management method for the user. Solanki and Brewster [110] focused on data traceability and proposed a framework that used an electronic product code (EPC) which provides traceability and information for products along the SC. Liu et al. [111] researched the Internet of Things (IoT) technologies and asserted that providing the storage and retrieval of information for harvests was five times faster using the IoT Name Service (IoTNS). It was also possible for the IoTNS to track the harvest from the farm to the market. La Scalia et al. [112] studied the smart logistics unit (SLU) to meet food safety and quality requirements in the case of strawberries. A shelf-life equation based on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was eventually provided which guaranteed food safety and shelf life, satisfying logistic efficiency from farm to fork and ensuring a sustainable system. Borrero [113] concentrated on the use of blockchain technology and smart contracts in the Spanish agri-food SC. A concept involving smart contracts and permissioned ledgers was proposed and its feasibility was demonstrated. Pal and Kant [114] conducted a comprehensive survey to determine the most prominent factors affecting the integration of intelligent technologies into the SC system and their utilization. It was stated that the future of this formation would depend on low-cost packaging technologies. Goisser et al. [115] focused on portable food scanners and the implementation of this innovation in the German fruit and vegetable supply chain in order to enhance food quality along the SC. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with different actors along the SC and the results indicated that the adoption of food scanners can improve quality at different stages of the SC.
Studies covered in this subsection were selected using the keywords blockchain, data integration, data traceability, and smart systems. The number of papers is much lower low than for other categories; however, one can expect the number to rise in the following years since these research fields have been showing an increasingly positive trend.
The studies in this subsection differ from the other categories, not only because of the problem in the FFVSC they focused on, but also due to the solution approach they adopted. Upgrading technology makes a positive impact on agriculture, and the employment of new technological tools, such as sensors and robotic systems, enables scientists and practitioners to solve complex problems in a shorter amount of time so that agribusinesses can become more productive, beneficial, secure, and environmentally friendly [116]. Therefore, this emerging research field is expected to progress in the near future. This subsection shows that technology can be employed, not only for decreasing the level of problems, but also for eliminating and furthermore, proactively preventing them. In this rapidly changing environment, all parties in the VC, including small farmers and the end customer, should learn about and adopt these technologies in their daily lives.

3.6. Packaging Issues of FFVSCs

Due to the nature of fresh fruits and vegetables, the role of packaging in their SC processes is pivotal. The main purpose in the packaging of fresh fruits and vegetables is to meet customer requirements regarding the quality and freshness of the product and to eliminate food loss so that farmers and firms do not suffer financial losses [117]. The material used for packing is also an essential point to consider [118]. To meet sustainability requirements, various issues, such as the packing procedure, the chosen material, recycling and/or reuse of the material, must be addressed. The main objective of the related research has been to increase food quality and to make a positive impact on the shelf life by developing packaging systems while controlling expenses.
Attempting to generate an integrated food packing and distribution network, Accorsi et al. [119] proposed a conceptual framework that provided an assessment for both the financial and the environmental impact of fresh food. The purpose was to establish a generalized framework which could be implemented for any type of food. The performance analysis of this framework was carried out using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) evaluation. An Italian fresh food catering chain was studied as the focal case and their fruit and vegetable packing and distribution were evaluated. A what-if multi-scenario approach was adopted and the proposed system was ultimately shown to reduce CO2 emissions. In contrast to the benefits it could provide for the environment, the proposed system did not lead to financial success and resulted in a price increase of €0.06 per kg.
Employing critical analysis, Battini et al. [120] analyzed two different packaging solutions (i.e., corrugated fiberboard boxes and re-usable plastic containers) from an economic and environmental perspective. A corrugated fiberboard box with removable plastic films and a reusable plastic container with a corrugated fiberboard bottom were introduced, aiming to overcome the constraints of existing solutions. These new packages were then tested to compare their performance with the original ones. It was concluded that the new packaging solutions were convenient to adopt from an economic and environmental point of view based on the outcomes of the scenarios applied.
In an effort to find the possible benefits and disadvantages of reusable plastic containers (RPCs) from an economic point of view, Singh et al. [118] gathered data from grocery retailers and performed a time-driven activity-based costing (TD-ABC) analysis. Subsequently, process times and product damage were observed and compared with the typical deployment of bulk containers in the grocery retailers’ distribution centers (DC), retail stores, and asset recovery centers of the SC. It was concluded that RPC application was highly recommended due to creating less waste and loss during the distribution of fresh products.
Giuggioli et al. [121] examined the case of Portola strawberries in Italy to assess the products packed in green films. Performing various analyses, such as total soluble solids (TSSs) analysis, nutraceutical analysis, statistical analysis (two-way analysis of variance), and principal components analysis, the authors found that selecting green films was more convenient for providing a sustainable improvement in the postharvest industry when using modified atmosphere package (MAP) technology.
Bortolini et al. [122] intended to create a SC network while considering the disposable and reusable packaging containers. Since the problem the authors tackled involved the best selection of packaging containers, the location of storage/handling nodes, and flow allocation, they built a bi-objective mixed integer linear programming model to inform the decision-making stage. A high level of attention was paid to the disposal and re-use of packaging containers due to their frequent use during the distribution of fresh fruits and vegetables in real life. A case from Emilia-Romagna, Italy was studied, and the authors found that both the disposable and the reusable packaging containers should be utilized in a balanced way to address the environmental and economic needs of the problem. To obtain the optimal outcome, which corresponded to decreasing the CO2 emissions while preventing cost increases, it was shown that 47.1% of the packaging containers should be reusable and the rest should be disposable.
Zhao et al. [123] designed a consolidated cold and MAP system for fresh fruits. With the purpose of presenting the advantages of cold chain adoption, fresh strawberries were studied as the focal case. The results confirmed the positive effect of the consolidated package system.
Packaging activities are crucial for the protection and transportation of items; however, they also cause a high amount of waste [119]. Packaging issues deserve a subsection of their own. This subsection touches on almost every issue regarding the VC: freshness of food, safety of food, transporting and stocking processes, sustainability concerns, etc. Studies covered in this subsection reveal that the main challenge for packaging problems is to satisfy both environmental and economic constraints. With the help of these studies, different aspects of the packaging state along the FFVSC are highlighted, and system improvements are recommended. Thus, attempts are made to optimize the freshness of food and the economic and environmental impacts.

3.7. Logistics Solutions of FFVSCs

This subsection describes studies seeking to solve logistic problems associated with FFVSCs. The main purpose of these studies is to increase the efficiency of logistic operations with the help of optimization and routing methodologies and to make an impact on the freshness of products while decreasing logistics costs.
To solve different transportation problems, Busato and Berruto [124] presented a simulation model, which enables forecasting of the quality loss of the harvest on the way from the packer to the consumer. Yan [125] focused on a fruit e-commerce website and its logistics demands. The study is based on the fruit SC’s logistics management of the corresponding e-commerce website. A system to run SC logistics and a structural framework is presented to manage the e-commerce SC activities. The fruit e-commerce website (FECW) which serves as a fourth-party logistics (4PL) provider, was considered to provide a basis for future studies. Etemadnia et al. [126] formulated a mixed integer linear programming model to create a network for the U.S. fruit and vegetable industry. The effect of changing a model’s parameters when deciding the optimal network was examined. Chandrasekaran and Ranganathan [127] analyzed the Indian traditional agriculture SC using genetic algorithms. The closed transportation method the authors proposed was found to be convenient for short-purpose domestic distribution. Ghezavati et al. [128] focused on maximizing profit during the distribution of tomatoes in Iran. A mixed integer programming model alongside the Benders decomposition method was employed. Mejjaouli and Babiceanu [129] examined the case of strawberries distributed from California to Dallas. The results showed that significant savings could be achieved if the logistics decision model proposed was used in the SC of perishable products.
The purpose of logistic studies in the FFVSC has been to maintain food quality, minimize distribution costs, and reduce CO2 emissions. Most of the studies in this subsection adopted analytical tools, such as mathematical models and simulation, to establish their formulations.

3.8. Sustainable FFVSCs

The eighth subsection describes studies concentrating on how to develop a better FFVSC in terms of sustainability. Sustainability acts as an umbrella issue. When we consider the SDGs, both public and private sectors try to engage with these goals. We expect that this issue will grow and will be encountered frequently in forthcoming years.
Smith [130] examined the ways in which it is possible to make SC activities more sustainable, and consequently identified the most essential determinants for this purpose, such as the responsibility for product quality. Styles et al. [131] presented a framework for retailers and established a hierarchy of eight best environmental management practices (BEMPs) to define and improve the environmental impact of SCs using performance benchmarking and the dissemination of better management practices. Naik and Suresh [132] studied the main problems in maintaining a sustainable SC and for meeting the requirements for food safety and food quality. Apart from retailers, corporations were also found to have a significant role in generating a sustainable agri-food SC. Blanc et al. [133] studied raspberry SCs in northwestern Italy using life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC), and externality assessment (ExA). Sustainability was combined with the use of bio-based plastics, which were eventually claimed to be the best choice due to their lower environmental and social impacts compared to conventional plastics. Using an empirical methodology based on analyses of energy fluxes and non-biodegradable materials, De Corato and Cancellara [134] focused on Italian firms and cooperatives to define the measures and technologies of energy efficiency, savings, and agro-waste recycling for the development of a feasible SC. Slamet et al. [135] focused on sustainable food supply chain management. The objective of this study was to find enablers to facilitate sustainable food supply chain management while engaging small-scale farmers in modern retail channels. Interpretive structural modelling was applied, and the results showed that collaboration and work among supply chain members were determined to be fundamental driving forces in SFSCM. Jabarzadeh and Yamchi [136] tackled an optimization problem for a fruit supply chain to achieve the three pillars of sustainability. The research problem was structured as a multi-objective, mixed-integer linear programming model. The results showed that the proposed model can also be applied to vegetable supply chains.
As can be seen, the sustainability concept needs to be focused on more and paid more attention to since this category comprises the least number of studies. In terms of the FAO definition, sustainable food value chains involve three pillars, which are (1) economic sustainability where it is profitable, (2) social sustainability where it is beneficial for society, and (3) environmental sustainability where it is compatible with nature [137]. The Commission on Sustainable Agriculture Intensification (CoSAI) emphasized that financial incentives reinforce sustainable agriculture. Currently, financial incentives are mainly public-sourced. Although over a short time period their environmental and social advantages have not been clearly defined, public and private sectors still undertake innovative initiatives and funding [138].
The studies listed in this subsection evaluate the FFVSC in terms of sustainability, which concerns the economic, social, and environmental impacts of activities and the solutions. With the help of these studies, a better food SC can be defined from a holistic point of view so that food SC activities can be tackled in a continuously effective way.

4. Conclusions and Future Research

An in-depth investigation of the FFVSC literature reveals that some serious problems exist that must be solved.
  •  The problem of establishing an effective value chain throughout the system while keeping KPIs in check has been widely studied. It is a common concern for both academics and practitioners, as underlined in Section 3.1. Because of the rapid changes at this time, the value chain and its performance should be evaluated or assessed in a very simple and understandable way. This will encourage involvement of almost all parties in the chain.
  •  Overcoming food-related problems along food SCs, especially postharvest losses, is also a significant topic according to information provided in Section 3.2, and still needs further research. At the moment, it appears that postharvest losses differ by country and crop. To the authors’ knowledge, there is no specific example which has a zero postharvest loss. We may employ a design thinking approach to find smart ways to handle this issue; different actors from different areas of expertise focusing on the same problem for their shared goal presents significant opportunities.
  •  Ensuring productivity for all parties in the value chain, reflecting the different parties involved in the system, is discussed in Section 3.3. The studies examined here consider different steps in the food SC, such as retail and wholesale. We need to conduct research considering small but impactful productivity gains across the chain.
  •  The review articles presented in Section 3.4 sought to cover the lack of resources relating to collective technical information.
  •  The difficulty in prioritizing technological innovations and solution approaches to existing SCs is described in Section 3.5. An innovative perspective is introduced to overcome the existing problems in the FFVSC. Sustainable innovation frameworks can be adopted for the FFVSC. It is a unique system because of the actors in the chain who have different expertise and backgrounds. It is also unique due to its issues of perishability and hard to manage inventories and has a major impact on our future in terms of nutrition and poverty.
  •  Inefficient postharvest processes that need to be improved in terms of packaging (Section 3.6) and shipment (Section 3.7) are also stressed. All these activities should be performed in a more environmentally conscious manner while maintaining or increasing their effectiveness. Processes along the food value chain can, thus, contribute to the world in terms of sustainability (Section 3.8).
These six highlights correspond to the categories presented earlier. They mainly cover different stages of the food chain. Most of these categories intersect in two or more ways. They address similar problems in the areas that require improvement. As there are strong interactions among the chains, even a small amount of development can have an indirect or direct impact on other fields. Following the investigation of FFVSC systems, possible directions for future research are clustered in five groups (Section 4.1) and associated limitations are listed as well (Section 4.2).
This review paper contributes theoretically to the FFVSC literature in terms of its visibility, agility and leanness.

4.1. Future Research

The present paper provides a comprehensive review of the FFVSC literature from a managerial point of view. Suggestions for future work highlighted during the examination of studies under consideration are provided in this subsection.
First, there is a shift from the SC management approach to the value chain (VC) concept [11,139]. It is highly possible that the SC concept will be more often interpreted as a VC and that this will be acknowledged more than the SC management concept in the near future. Even though the SC concept provides a comprehensive perspective, it is not possible to hear the customer’s voice using it. The downstream flow from raw material to the end customer, which is expressed as the SC, differs from the VC. According to the VC concept, “value-added” actions are provided for customers that are willing to pay for the product, whereas “non-value added” activities are simply a waste for enterprises [140]. Although the SC monitors the system from the raw material phase to the end customer, the VC starts with the voice of the customer and ends with customer satisfaction. Therefore, examining the system as a VC may provide a better understanding. Although we design and develop a system, we should always work with the customer instead of assuming their needs. This review article has also emphasized that the actors in the VC should be ready to work together for integrated efficiency. Thus, every party should first understand the underserved customer needs and that their customer is the next party in the chain not just the end customer.
Secondly, academics and practitioners around the world encourage all parties to collaborate with each other in conducting multidisciplinary research. We may employ partnership frameworks based on empiricism and teamwork between academics, practitioners, entrepreneurs, technology developers, government organizations and non-governmental organizations, etc. Faced with the pandemic, we learnt that we need to act fast and together. Since the frequency of global food traffic may increase in the near future, as the COVID-19 pandemic has proven, there is a need for large-scale global studies. Future food scenarios are diverse. Some focus on hunger whereas others defend the circular economy [141,142]. Conducting further work on endemic products or harvests that can only be planted in a limited geographical area may also extend the boundaries of the existing literature. As described in [60,61], case-specific studies for harvests that are produced in limited geographical areas due to the climate can be more suitable for this purpose to better understand the managerial implications during the distribution of such products. As mentioned in [34,49], apart from the logistics side of these studies, regulations regarding the import and export processes may be examined to understand various performance and strategy indicators more closely. Furthermore, women’s involvement in FFVSC activities is a suggested area of study, as underlined in [143]. As discussed in Section 3.2, 3.6–3.8, such developments in the current literature would mainly improve food quality, food safety and the freshness of food.
Thirdly, there is a gap in the literature regarding e-commerce models. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the rate of use of e-commerce has grown substantially. There is abundant room for further progress in this aspect of FFVSCs. To the best of our knowledge, there is only one study that specifically considered this topic [125]. Most of the e-businesses do not build retail stores to reach the customer. In this model, orders are carried from storage to customers. These orders are specifically designed based on customer selections and shipped to their preferred addresses. Thus, harvests are not carried in bulk, but they can be packed in customized packages. On the other hand, the distribution of these goods introduces another concern since there is a larger network and the allocation of these packages is not standardized. Regardless of economic concerns, the importance of home delivery was strongly emphasized during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, both the quantity and operational area of entrepreneurial e-businesses are expected to increase. These entrepreneurial businesses and startups can be evaluated if their business model is profitable. In addition to these, some countries were faced with the failure of agricultural activities, since farmers had difficulties reaching the markets during the pandemic [144]. Therefore, new trading schemes should be studied for small producers to reach the market. Based on the details provided in Section 3.3, 3.5 and 3.7, future studies on the current topic are recommended.
In addition to e-business firms, there is another highly promising model that needs to be studied. In this newly proposed business model, there are no intermediaries between the producers (farmers/cooperative societies) and the receivers (retailers/marketplaces/e-business firms). Discarding the mediators, receivers can buy harvests directly from producers. In this way, data traceability systems can be integrated into SC systems. An online platform seeking to bring both producers and big buyers together in the same virtual environment has recently been adopted in Turkey for agricultural operations. This project, called the Digital Agriculture Bazaar (Dijital Tarım Pazarı–DİTAP), aims to bring producers and receivers together on the same platform and to help them collaborate with each other [145]. Data received during production will, therefore, be tracked; non-value adding costs, such as commissions paid to intermediaries will be eliminated and customers will be served in a safe and fast way. Such applications should especially be studied due to their promising business models and their potential to extend the boundaries of the existing literature.
In this study, we reviewed 118 articles, but topics on sustainability, the circular economy, and the use of food waste in biorefineries, were not featured areas in the scientific literature. This observation may imply that these issues should be studied in future research.
Finally, the number of studies involving blockchain and other smart technologies are expected to grow exponentially with the emergence of Industry 4.0 applications. Various new technologies and platforms have recently been introduced to agricultural businesses to provide data traceability, data integration, etc. In such projects, both producers and receivers take part. First, the involvement of farmers should be examined through survey studies since changes in the habits of farmers can pose a new concern. Second, money transactions in virtual environments should be observed. Since these transactions can be executed using blockchain technology, future research should pay more attention to data traceability and integration.

4.2. Limitations

All the studies in the relevant literature were limited by the absence of a holistic approach that would provide better insights on all aspects of the food SCs. Different cultures, backgrounds, countries, and climates may lead to different types of SCs; however, the literature fails to account for behavioral differences in different parts of the world. In particular, the number of case studies addressing food SCs which consider all their aspects is insufficient.

References

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Ö.Ö.T.; methodology, Ö.Ö.T.; investigation, Ö.Ö.T.; writing—original draft preparation, Ö.Ö.T.; writing—review and editing, Ö.Ö.T., Ö.V. and E.Ç.; visualization, Ö.Ö.T.; supervision, Ö.V. and E.Ç. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Thematic Map of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Supply Chains.
Figure A1. Thematic Map of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Supply Chains.
Sustainability 14 01573 g0a1

Appendix B

Table A1. Studies Presented in the Category of Value Chain Indicators in Section 3.1.
Table A1. Studies Presented in the Category of Value Chain Indicators in Section 3.1.
IDAuthorsYearTitleKeywordsMethod UsedCase Study/Test
17Wermund and Fearne2000Key challenges facing the cherry supply chain in the UKCompetition, cherries, market opportunity, supply chain* Qualitative researchCherry supply chain in the UK
18Hewett2003Perceptions of supply chain management for perishable horticultural crops: An introductionFruits and vegetables, supply chain, management, logistics, quality, kiwifruit, apples, apricots, consumer satisfaction Stone fruit industry from New Zealand
19Hingley2004Relationship development in the UK fresh produce supply chainRelationships, supply chain, power and dependency, trust, fresh produce Multiple leading UKfood retailers
20Maruyama and Hirogaki2007The evolution of fresh produce supply chains: From spot markets to contractsSupply chain, fresh produce, vertical co-ordination Japanese marketing chain
21Mergenthaler et al.2008Consumer demand for fruits and vegetables from modern supply chains in Vietnamtransformation, food systems, supermarkets, food safety, non-traditional imports, modern supply chain* Two-stage budgeting frameworkVietnam’s two major cities, Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City
22Clements et al.2008Relationship connectors in NZ fresh produce supply chainsFresh foods, supply chain management, supplier relations, New Zealand* Case study approachTwo case studies of fresh produce supply chains in the South Island of New Zealand
23Feng et al.2008VegRisk: A decision support system for risk management of vegetable supply chainDecision support systems,
risk management, supply chains, educational institutions, uncertainty, production, crisis management, agricultural engineering, protection,
international trade
* Price risk management method
* Coefficient of variation model
Xinfadi Agricultural Products Co., Ltd.
24Zúñiga-Arias et al.2009Managing quality heterogeneity in the mango supply chain: evidence from Costa Rica-* Structured interviews
* Laboratory analysis of mango quality
Mango supply chain from Costa Rica
25Cadilhon et al.2009Market linkages: Characterizing business-to-business relationships in Vietnamese vegetable supply chainsB2B relationships, marketing, supply chain management, Viet Nam* In-depth interviewsThe tomato and butterhead lettuce supply chains in Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC)
26Stringer et al.2009Producers, processors, and procurement decisions: The case of vegetable supply chains in ChinaSupply chains, vegetable markets, supermarkets, China* Conjoint analysisVegetable processors from Laiyang County, Shandong province, China’s largest horticultural production and export region
27King2010Comparing the structure, size, and performance of local and mainstream food supply chains (Book Chapter)-* Case study approachFifteen case studies in five metropolitan areas with the products of apples, blueberries, spring mix leafy greens, beef, and milk
28Verdouw et al.2010Process modelling in demand-driven supply chains: A reference model for the fruit industryBusiness process modelling, supply chain management, reference models, fruit industry* Reference process modelsIn four European countries (The Netherlands, Spain, Poland, Greece)
29Jiao and Shen2010Study on market equilibrium of sealed supply chain based on willingness to pay for food safety-* Classical Hotelling analytical framework
30Samuel et al.2012An insight into agri-food supply chains: A reviewAgri-food supply chain, organised and unorganised retailing, value chain management, procurement and marketing strategies, international business, India, China, USA, UK, Australia, Southeast Asia
31Fizzanty et al.2013Learning from failed supply chains: The application of complex adaptive systems and a modified SAFE framework in evaluating proposed system improvementsSupply chain management, fruit supply chains, developing country, complex adaptive systems, CAS, systems improvement, buyer–supplier relationships, agile systems* Complex adaptive systems (CAS) perspective
* Sustainability, acceptability, feasibility, efficiency (SAFE) framework
* Cross-case analysis
Two case studies set in the mango industry of Indonesia
32Cai et al.2013Fresh-product supply chain management
with logistics outsourcing
Perishable product, supply chain management, multiple-party coordination, Third-party logistics, coordination contracts NONE
33Kundu and Kar2013Identifying the physical distribution form and supply chain issues in marketing F&V products by organised supermarkets: A case on reliance distribution modelFruits and vegetables, retailing, physical distribution model, supply chain, contract farming, supermarkets, distribution centers* Traditional retail model
* Reliance value chain business model
34Götz et al.2014Vertical price transmission in the international fresh fruit and vegetable supply chain: Israeli grapefruit exports to the EU after export liberalisationInternational fresh fruit and vegetable supply chain, vertical price transmission, export liberalization, market power, Israel, citrus* Cointegration approach
* Engel–Granger representation theorem
* Augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) Test
Israeli grapefruit growers.
35Bahinipati2014The procurement perspectives of fruits and vegetables supply chain planningFood industry, supply chain planning, information sharing, collaborative practices The supermarket (SM) venture
36Obeth et al.2014Non-attractiveness of modern supply
chains
Banana, modern supply chain, traditional supply chain, risk* Open-ended interviewsBanana traders in Lampung Province, Sumatra Island and Banten, Java Island
37Chen et al.2015Investigating the robustness of the agricultural supply chain based on colored Petri netsAgricultural supply chain, simulation, colored Petri nets, robustness, optimization method* Optimization method
* colored Petri nets
38Aysoy et al.2015How does a shorter supply chain affect pricing of fresh food? Evidence from a natural experimentSupply chain reform, fresh food prices, incomplete pass-through, quasi-experimental design* Quasi-experimental methodsNONE
39Karyani et al.2016Mango agricultural supply chain: Actors, business process, and financing schemeEconomic globalization, mango, supply chain financing, inclusive agribusiness, and value stream mapping.* Value stream mapping
* Descriptive analysis
Mango farmers in West Java
40Gamboa et al.2016The complexity of food systems: Defining relevant attributes and indicators for the evaluation of food supply chains in SpainFood systems, food supply chains, narratives, integrated assessment* Integrated assessment
* Content analysis
* Lexicometric analysis
Three organic tomato supply chains in Spanish and Catalan contexts
41Webb2017Towards an agri-food ‘culture’: Managing the impact on agricultural supply chains of changes in consumer culture (Book Chapter)Agriculture, consumer culture, environment, food, public health, supply chains* Critical theoryNONE
42Negi and Anand2018Factors leading to supply chain inefficiency in agribusiness: Evidence from Asia’s largest wholesale marketSupply chain inefficiency, wholesale market, food supply chain, tomato supply chain, food losses and wastages* Factor analysisTomato supply chain in India at Asia’s largest wholesale fruits and vegetable market (Mandi) in Azadpur, Delhi
43Siddh et al.2018Structural model of perishable food supply chain quality (PFSCQ) to improve sustainable organizational performanceSupply chain, quality, perishable food supply chain quality (PFSCQ), perishable food supply chain quality (PFSCQ) practices, sustainable organizational performance* PFSCQ practices
44Shashi et al.2018Evaluating partnerships in sustainability-oriented food supply chain: A five-stage performance measurement modelSustainable and energy-efficient supply chain, food supply chain performance, partners’ performance, performance measurement, operations management, structural equation modeling* Survey study
* Structural equation modeling (SEM)
* Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) test
* Exploratory factor analysis with the varimax rotation method
Indian food industry
45Arshinder and Balaji2019Understanding the models of Indian fruit and vegetable supply chains-A case study approachF&V supply chains, food supply chains, wholesale markets, price variability, India* Case study approachA typical Indian metropolitan city
46Nakandala and Lau2019Innovative adoption of hybrid supply
chain strategies in urban local fresh food supply chain
Efficiency, supply chain management, agility, supply chain strategy, trust, legality, local fresh food, collaboration and relationships, urban food systems* Multiple case study method
* Thematic analysis
Twelve urban local fresh food retailers in Sydney
47Cao and Mohiuddin2019Sustainable emerging country agro-food supply chains: Fresh vegetable price formation mechanisms in rural ChinaSupply chain, fresh and raw vegetables, price conduction, granger causality test* Elastic model of price conduction
* Stationarity test
* Co-Integration test
* Granger causality analysis
Greenhouse cucumber supply chain in China
48Negi and Anand2019Wholesalers’ perspectives on mango supply chain efficiency in IndiaFood supply chain, cold chain, food losses and wastages, fruit supply chain, smart mandi, supply chain efficiency, wholesale market* Factor analysisWholesale stage of the mango supply chain in India, at Asia’s largest and the world’s second largest fruits and vegetable wholesale market (Mandi) in Azadpur, Delhi.
49Pavez et al.2019Biosecurity institutions and the choice of contracts in international fruit supply chains-* Econometric analysisChilean apple exports
50Nedumaran et al.2020Digital integration to enhance market efficiency and inclusion of smallholder farmers: A proposed model for fresh fruit and vegetable supply chainSupply chain, fresh fruits and vegetables, primary processing centers, market information system, India The main FFV-producing states in India
51Waqas et al.2020Underlying dimensions of supply chain risks amongst agropreneurs of fresh fruits and vegetables in MalaysiaSupply chain risks, agropreneurs, agri-fresh supply chain of fresh fruits and vegetables.* Questionnaire survey
* Snowballing and
convenience sampling method
Malaysia
Table A2. Studies Presented in the Category of Food-Related Problems/Postharvest Loss in Section 3.2.
Table A2. Studies Presented in the Category of Food-Related Problems/Postharvest Loss in Section 3.2.
IDAuthorsYearTitleKeywordsMethod UsedCase Study/Test
52Digal2005Quality grading in the supply chain: The case of vegetables in Southern PhilippinesQuality grading, price asymmetry, search cost, supply chain* A model is employed which shows that grading provides information that lowers the search cost of buyers.Vegetable industry in the Southern Philippines
53Russell et al.2009Losses of vitamin C from fresh strawberries in a commercial supply chainCold chain, distribution, moisture, strawberries, supply chain, temperature, transportation, vitamin C* HPLC method
* Standard drying oven method
* Statistical analysis (analysis of variance, multiple linear regression)
NONE
54Cai et al.2010Optimization and coordination of fresh product supply chains with freshness-keeping effortSupply chain management, perishable products, cold chains, freshness-keeping effort, pricing NONE
55Jacxsens et al. 2010Simulation modelling and risk assessment as tools to identify the impact of climate change on microbiological food safety-The case study of fresh produce supply chainClimate change, food safety management system, fresh produce, microbiological food safety* Risk assessment studies
* Advanced simulation models
* Mathematical models
Fresh-cut vegetables
56Diez-Valcarce et al. 2011construction and analytical application of internal amplification controls (IAC) for detection of food supply chain-relevant viruses by real-time PCR-based assaysEnteric virus, false negatives, food, internal amplification control, real-time PCR* Real-Time PCRNONE
57Sivakumar and Wall2013Papaya fruit quality management during the postharvest supply chainCarica papaya, fruit quality, health-promoting compounds, postharvest management practices, tropical fruit* Postharvest management practicesPapaya fruit
58Li and Qiao2013Preservation behavior decision of fruits and vegetables supply chainFruits and vegetables supply chain, iterative relationship preservation behavior, Litchi supply chain
59Jraisat and Sawalha2013Quality control and supply chain management: A contextual perspective and a case studySupply chain management, quality control, exports, fruit and vegetable industry, Jordan* Case study approachFresh fruit and vegetable supply chain in Jordan
60Macheka et al.2013Identifying causes of mechanical defects and critical control points in fruit supply chains: An overview of a banana supply chainPostharvest losses, mechanical defects, banana, supply chain, critical control point Banana fruit supply chain in Zimbabwe
61Bill et al. 2014Avocado fruit quality management during the postharvest supply chainAtmosphere modification, fruit softening, packaging, Persea americana, postharvest diseases Avocado fruit
62Blanke2014Reducing ethylene levels along the food supply chain: A key to reducing food waste?ethylene, ethylene absorber, ethylene inhibitor, ethylene scrubber, sensor technology, supply chain, waste, whole crop purchase (WCP) Apple fruit
63Janssen et al.2014Ethylene detection in fruit supply chainsElectrochemical sensors, ethene, ethylene, gas analytics, gas chromatography, non-dispersive infrared* Several measuring methods for the detection of ethyleneNONE
64LeBlanc et al.2015A national produce supply chain database for food safety risk analysisRelational database, food supply chain, logistics, food safety risk assessment, simulation, Escherichia coli O157:H7* Integrated simulation toolLettuce and leafy greens in Canada
65Hou et al. 2015Food safety standards and international supply chain organization: A case study of the Moroccan fruit and vegetable exportsMorocco, fruits and vegetables, food safety, supply chains, supermarket-channel, wholesaler-channel* Principal components analysisMoroccan fruit and vegetable supply chain (Souss Massa Region)
66Hoaran et al.2016Fuzzy TOPSIS-based supply chain optimization of fresh agricultural productsExpert evaluation methods, fresh agricultural products, loss, supply chain network optimization, TOPSIS* Fuzzy TOPSISNONE
67Zoellner et al.2016Microbial dynamics of indicator microorganisms on fresh tomatoes in the supply chain from Mexico to the USATomatoes, indicator microorganisms, postharvest, supply chain, safety* Microbiological analyses
* Statistical analyses (Analysis of variance, Tukey–Kramer honestly significant difference (HSD) test)
Roma tomatoes in the supply chain between Mexico and USA
68Ramanathan et al.2017A study on sources of vegetable supply chain wastage with specific reference to retail outlets in Tamil NaduFood wastage, retail wastage, vegetable supply chains, transport wastage, vegetable wastage, vegetables, retail outlets, Tamil Nadu, India, vegetable retailers, travel distances, labour shortage, poor packing, handling damage Vegetable retail stores in four locations of Tamilnadu such as Chennai, Dindugul, Coimbatore and suburban areas of Chennai, India
69Gardas et al.2017Modeling causal factors of post-harvesting losses in vegetable and fruit supply chain: An Indian perspectivePost-harvesting losses (PHL), vegetable and fruit supply chains, critical causal factors, interpretive structural modeling (ISM) methodology* Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach
* MICMAC analysis
In Maharashtra state, India
70Jacxsens et al. 2017Food safety management and risk assessment in the fresh produce supply chain-* Mathematical model
* Fragmented microbiological analysis
* Information of cultivation practices
Basil, strawberry and butterhead lettuce to which Belgian and Spanish consumers are exposed per year
71Orjuela-Castro andAdarme-Jaimes2018Evaluating the supply chain design of fresh food on food security and logisticsSupply chain design, fresh food, food security, logistics Three SCs of fresh fruits in Colombia
72Fabbri et al.2018Improving environmental performance of post-harvest supply chains of fruits and vegetables in Europe: Potential contribution from ultrasonic humidificationHumidification, life cycle assessment, food supply, food loss, food waste, ultrasonic* Life cycle assessmentStrawberries, peaches, table grapes, and asparagus supply chains in Europe in terms of transportation distances and direction of the supply (with the general trend from the South of Europe to other European countries). between 2015 and 2016
73Mercier and Uysal2018Neural network models for predicting perishable food temperatures along the supply chainPerishable food, cold chain, quality-driven distribution, temperature prediction, neural network, heat transfer* Heat transfer model
* Neural network
NONE
74Zoellner et al.2018Postharvest supply chain with microbial travelers: A farm-to-retail microbial simulation and visualization frameworkFresh produce, microbial dynamics, postharvest, supply chain* Postharvest supply chain with the microbial travelers (PSCMT) toolTomato supply chain from Mexico tothe United States
75Hernández-Rubio et al.2018Determinants of food safety level in fruit and vegetable wholesalers’ supply chain: Evidence from Spain and FranceFood safety, fruits and vegetables, wholesaler, importer, long supply chain* Hypotheses of analysisSpanish and French intermediaries working in key wholesale markets and in the southeast of Spain
76Kelly et al.2019A novel approach to determine the impact level of each step along the supply chain on strawberry qualityFragaria x ananassa, supply chain, waste, temperature, bioactive compounds, sugars* Instrumental color and texture analysis
* Ascorbic acid analysis
* Statistical analysis (two-way analysis of variance)
Strawberry supply chain from Fancy Farms, USA
77Diaz-Ruiz et al.2019Food waste prevention along the food supply chain: A multi-actor approach to identify effective solutionsBarcelona, food losses, Delphi, food waste prevention, food redistribution, reduction* Delphi method
* In-depth interviews
Barcelona metropolitan region
78Caldeira et al.2019Quantification of food waste per product group along the food supply chain in the European Union: a mass flow analysisFood waste, mass balance, food groups, by-products, systematic accounting, food value chain* Mass flow analysisMajor EU food groups: sugar beets, oil crops, potatoes, vegetables, fruit, cereals, meat, fish, dairy, and eggs
79Zhang et al.2019Novel model and kernel search heuristic for multi-period closed-loop food supply chain planning with returnable transport itemsClosed-loop food supply chain, perishable food, returnable transport item, mixed integer linear programming, kernel search* Mathematical problemA food manufacturer in China
80Xu et al.2020A real-time decision support framework to mitigate degradation in perishable supply chainsPerishable supply chains, real-time decision making, vehicle routing, inventory allocation, quality control, optimal environment factors* Integer programming model
* Quality index method
Fresh apple supply chain
Table A3. Studies Presented in the Category of Role of Parties in the Value Chain in Section 3.3.
Table A3. Studies Presented in the Category of Role of Parties in the Value Chain in Section 3.3.
IDAuthorsYearTitleKeywordsMethod UsedCase Study/Test
81Hingley2001Relationship management in the supply chainBuyers, relationship marketing, retailing, supplier relations, supply-chain management* Multiple depth interviews
* Multi-case, multi-site
UK fresh produce market
82Louw et al.2008Alternative marketing options for small-scale farmers in the wake of changing agri-food supply chains in South AfricaAgri-food supply chains, small-scale farmers, alternative marketing channels South African agri-food chain
83Arumugam et al.2010Supply chain analysis of fresh fruits and vegetables (FFV): Prospects of contract farmingsupply chain, contract farming, contract farmers, factor analysis* Factor analysis
* Descriptive and inferential statistics
Malaysia
84Schipmann and Qaim2011Supply chain differentiation, contract agriculture, and farmers’ marketing preferences: The case of sweet pepper in ThailandChoice experiment, contract design, farmers’ stated preferences, modern agricultural supply chains, Thailand* Lancaster’s model
* Random parameters logit (RPL) model
Sweet pepper in Thailand
85Sayın et al.2011The role of wholesale markets in the supply chain for fresh fruit and vegetables in Turkeysupply chain management, distribution, domestic market, wholesale market, producer unions, European Union* SWOT analysisSupply chain for fresh fruit and vegetables in Turkey
86Guarín2013The value of domestic supply chains: Producers, wholesalers, and urban consumers in ColombiaColombia, smallholders, supermarkets, supply chains, wholesale markets* Value chain approach
* In-depth interviews
* Semi-structured interviews
Perishables in Colombia, including fruits, vegetables, roots and tubers, and beef.
87Schuster and Maertens2013Do private standards create exclusive supply chains? New evidence from the Peruvian asparagus export sectorGlobal supply chains, horticulture, Peru, private standards, small-scale farming* Fixed effects
* GMM estimators
Peruvian asparagus export sector
88Wahyudin et al.2015An agri-food supply chain model for
cultivating the capabilities of farmers in accessing capital using corporate social responsibility program
Agri-food supply chain, corporate social responsibility, multi-integer linear goal programming, small-scale vegetables farmers* Multi-integer linear programming (MILP)NONE
89Jacob-John and Veerapa2016Perception of fairness within organic fresh produce supply chains: The case of small and medium fresh produce retailersFairness, ethics, retailers, supply chain, trust, B2B* Multiple case study approach
* Semi-structured interviews
Small and medium fresh produce retailers
90Michelson et al.2018Connecting supermarkets and farms: The role of intermediaries in Walmart China’s fresh produce supply chainsVertical integration, supply chains, small farmers, supermarkets, Walmart,
agricultural development, China
* In-depth descriptive analysisWalmart China
91Devin andRichards2018Food waste, power, and corporate social responsibility in the Australian food supply chainCorporate social responsibility (CSR), food supply chain, food waste, power, supermarkets* Interviews
* Document analysis
Australian fresh fruit and vegetable supply chain
92Elder2019The impact of supermarket supply chain governance on smallholder farmer cooperatives: the case of Walmart in NicaraguaAgricultural supply chains, cooperatives, Nicaragua, smallholder farmers, supermarkets, Walmart* InterviewsSupermarkets and cooperatives in Nicaragua
93Salvia2020The restructuring of Italian agriculture and its impact upon capital–labour relations: Labour contracting and exploitation in the fresh fruit and vegetable supply chain of the Lazio Region, Central ItalyCentral Italy, agricultural labour, fresh fruit and vegetable production, labour contracting, value chains* In-depth interviewsLazio, Central Italy.
94Gunarathna and Mahinda Bandara2020Post-Harvest Losses and the Role of Intermediaries in the Vegetable Supply Chainintermediaries, post-harvest losses, vegetable supply chain* In-depth personal
interview
Vegetable
supply chain in Sri Lanka
Table A4. Studies Presented in the Category of Review Papers in Section 3.4.
Table A4. Studies Presented in the Category of Review Papers in Section 3.4.
IDAuthorsYearTitleKeywordsMethod UsedCase Study/Test
95Rajurkar and Jain2011Food supply chain management: Review, classification and analysis of literatureFood supply chains, literature reviews, literature classification, literature analysis, global competition, codification, roadmaps, research, integrated supply chains, SCM, supply chain management* Literature reviews* Literature classification* Literature analysis_
96Kong et al.2013Auction logistics in perishable supply chain trading: A research agendaPhysical Internet, auction logistics, perishable supply chain trading, planning, scheduling and execution* Literature reviews
* Literature classification
* Literature analysis
_
97Aung and Chang2014Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectivesTraceability, safety, quality, food supply chain, identification, food contamination* Literature reviews
* Literature classification
* Literature analysis
_
98Sibomana et al. 2016A review of postharvest handling and losses in the fresh tomato supply chain: a focus on Sub-Saharan AfricaPostharvest losses, tomatoes, packaging, temperature control, disinfection, transportation* Literature reviews
* Literature classification
* Literature analysis
_
99Siddh et al.2017Agri-fresh food supply chain quality (AFSCQ): a literature reviewAgri-fresh food, agri-fresh food supply chain quality, literature review, supply chain quality* Literature reviews
* Literature classification
* Literature analysis
_
100Routroy and Behera2017Agriculture supply chain: A systematic review of literature and implications for future researchAgricultural products, agriculture, supply chain management* Literature reviews
* Literature classification
* Literature analysis
_
101Raak et al.2017Processing- and product-related causes for food waste and implications for the food supply chainBy-products, expert interview, food losses, food processing, food waste, literature review, suboptimal food* Literature reviews
* Literature classification
* Literature analysis
_
102Saitone and Sexton2017Agri-food supply chain: evolution and performance with conflicting consumer and societal demandsFood quality, modern agricultural markets, supply chain, vertical coordination* Literature reviews
* Literature classification
* Literature analysis
_
103Gharehgozli et al.2017Trends in global E-food supply chain
and implications for transport: literature review and research directions
E-business solutions, food supply chain management, new trends, research agenda, transport* Literature reviews
* Literature classification
* Literature analysis
_
104Luo et al.2018Agri-food supply chain management: Bibliometric and content analysesAgri-food supply chain, bibliometric analysis, citation analysis, co-citation analysis, content analysis* Literature reviews
* Literature classification
* Literature analysis
* Bibliometric analysis
* Citation analysis
_
105Corrado and Sala2018Food waste accounting along global and European food supply chains: State of the art and outlookCircular economy, estimation, food loss, food waste, Sustainable Development Goal 12, waste framework directive* Literature reviews
* Literature classification
* Literature analysis
_
106Lezoche et al.2020Agri-food 4.0: A survey of the supply chains and technologies for thefuture agricultureAgri-Food 4.0, Agriculture 4.0, artificial intelligence, big data, blockchain, Internet of Things, supply chains* Literature reviews
* Literature classification
* Literature analysis
_
107Priyadarshi et al.2020Postharvest supply chain losses: a state-of-the-art literature review and bibliometric analysisAgriculture supply chain losses, bibliometric analysis, postharvest supply chain losses, rural entrepreneurship, value addition, vertical integration* Literature reviews
* Literature classification
* Literature analysis
* Bibliometric analysis
_
Table A5. Studies Presented in the Category of Technological Trends in Section 3.5.
Table A5. Studies Presented in the Category of Technological Trends in Section 3.5.
IDAuthorsYearTitleKeywordsMethod UsedCase Study/Test
108 Duan et al.2007Accelerating internet adoption in China’s fresh produce supply chain: A vegnet approachChina, fresh produce supply chain, Internet adoption, Internet technologies, supply chain management* Interviews
* Case studies
China
109Hu et al.2011AgriRiskIDSS: Development of an intelligent decision support system for price risk management of agricultural product supply chainChina, IDSS (intelligent decision support system), intelligent information process, price risk management, vertical search engine* Intelligent decision support system
* Genetic algorithm
* Wavelet analysis coefficients
* Neural network
NONE
110Solanki and Brewster2014Enhancing visibility in EPCIS governing agri-food supply chains via linked pedigrees (Book Chapter)- Fresh fruit and vegetables supply chain in the agri-food sector.
111Liu et al.2015Enterprise-oriented IoT name service for agricultural product supply chain management-* IoT architectureFive cities of China.
112La Scalia et al.2017An innovative shelf-life model based
on smart logistic unit for an efficient management of the perishable food supply chain
-* Volatile organic compounds
* microbiological analysis
Strawberries
113Borrero2019Agri-food supply chain
traceability for fruit and vegetable cooperatives using Blockchain technology
Agriculture supply chain, blockchain, cooperatives, food traceability, proof of concept, smart agriculture, smart contract, trust-building* Blockchain
* Smart contract
Spain
114Pal and Kant2020Smart sensing, communication, and
control in perishable food supply chain
Communication infrastructure, data analytics, food quality sensing, food supply chain, physical Internet, privacy, security* Arrhenius equation
* Michaelis–Menten kinetics equation
* Kinetic modeling
* Gompertz model
115Goisser et al.2020Food-scanners as a radical innovation in German fresh produce supply chainsFood-scanner, fruit and vegetable supply chain, qualitative research, quality measurement* Semi-structured interviews
* Qualitative content analysis
German fruit and vegetable supply chain
Table A6. Studies Presented in the Category of Packaging in Section 3.6.
Table A6. Studies Presented in the Category of Packaging in Section 3.6.
IDAuthorsYearTitleKeywordsMethod UsedCase Study/Test
119Accorsi et al. 2014Economic and environmental
assessment of reusable plastic containers: A food catering supply chain case study
Food supply chain (FSC), life cycle assessment (LCA), packaging, sensitivity analysis, sustainability* Life cycle assessment (LCA)
* Life cycle costing (LCC)
An Italian fresh food catering chain
120Battini et al.2016Sustainable packaging development for fresh food supply chainseconomic analysis, environmental analysis, fresh food distribution, fresh food packaging, sustainability* Critical analysis
118Singh et al. 2016Packaging’s role in sustainability: Reusable plastic containers in the agricultural-food supply chainsAgricultural-food supply chains, one-way and reusable packaging, sustainability
121Giuggioli et al.2017Sustainable supply-chain: evolution of the quality characteristics of strawberries stored in green film packagingFilms, freshness quality, fruits, modified atmosphere, packaging, temperature* Total soluble solids analysis
* Nutraceutical analysis
* Statistical analysis (two-way analysis of variance)
* Principal components analysis
Portola strawberries in Italy
122Bortolini et al. 2018Bi-objective design of fresh food supply chain networks with reusable and disposable packaging containersBi-objective optimization, fresh food distribution network, packaging, supply chain design, sustainability
123Zhao et al.2019Consolidated cold and modified atmosphere package system for fresh strawberry supply chainsCold storage, expanded polystyrene box, package, phase change materials, polyethylene film* Statistical analysis (analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range testFresh strawberries
Table A7. Studies Presented in the Category of Logistics in Section 3.7.
Table A7. Studies Presented in the Category of Logistics in Section 3.7.
IDAuthorsYearTitleKeywordsMethod UsedCase Study/Test
124Busato and Berruto 2006FruitGame: Simulation model to study the supply chain logistics for fresh produceFresh fruits, fresh vegetable, logistics, modeling, supply chain* Object-oriented simulation
125Yan2009The research of supply chain logistics management on fruit E-commerce website- Fresh fruits in Sichuan Province
126Etemadnia et al.2015Optimal wholesale facilities location within the fruit and vegetables supply chain with bimodal transportation options: An LP-MIP heuristic approachOperation research, optimal hub location bimodal transportation, supply chain* Mixed integer linear programming (MILP)An application is made to the U.S. fruit and vegetable industry
127Chandrasekaran and
Ranganathan
2017Modelling and optimisation of Indian traditional agriculture supply chain to reduce post-harvest loss and CO2 emissionCarbon dioxide emission, post-harvest losses, respiration, supply chain planning, transportation* Genetic algorithm
* The closed transportation method
Indian traditional agriculture SC
128Ghezavati et al.2017A Benders’ decomposition algorithm for optimizing distribution of perishable products considering postharvest biological behavior in agri-food supply chain: A case study of tomatoAgri-food supply chain, Benders’ decomposition, fair pricing, fresh products, mixed integer programming, postharvest maturity behavior* Mixed integer programming model
* Benders’ decomposition method
A case study of tomatoes in Iran
129Mejjaouli and
Babiceanu
2018Cold supply chain logistics: System optimization for real-time rerouting transportation solutionsCold supply chain, RFID monitoring system, system optimization, transportation rerouting* RFID-WSN logistics modelStrawberries from California to Dallas
Table A8. Studies Presented in the Category of Sustainability in Section 3.8.
Table A8. Studies Presented in the Category of Sustainability in Section 3.8.
IDAuthorsYearTitleKeywordsMethod UsedCase Study/Test
130Smith2008Developing sustainable food supply chainsCorporate social responsibility, food manufacture, food retail, food supply chains, sustainable agriculture
131Styles et al.2012Environmental improvement of product supply chains: Proposed best practice techniques, quantitative indicators and benchmarks of excellence for retailersBenchmarking, ecolabels, green procurement, lifecycle assessment, retail, supply chains, sustainability* Performance benchmarking
* Dissemination of better management practices
132Naik and Suresh2018Challenges of creating sustainable agri-retail supply chainsAgri-food supply chains, horticulture, organized retail, regulation, social impact, sustainability
133Blanc et al.2019Use of bio-based plastics in the fruit supply chain: An integrated approach to assess environmental, economic, and social sustainabilityBio-based materials, green economy, life-cycle assessment, life-cycle costing, social impact* Life cycle assessment (LCA)
* Life cycle costing (LCC)
* Externality assessment (ExA)
Raspberry supply chains in northwestern Italy
134Corato and
Cancellara
2019Measures, technologies, and incentives for cleaning the minimally processed fruits and vegetables supply chain in the Italian food industryBio-based material, energy consumption and management, energy efficiency and saving, food processing, renewable source, waste recycling* Analysis of the energy fluxes
* Analysis of un-biodegradable materials
Italian MPFV companies
(firms/cooperatives)
135Slamet et al.2020Making food supply chain sustainable: Participating smallholder farmers in modern retail channelsISM, enabler, interpretive structural modelling, modern retail, smallholder farmer, sustainable food supply chain* Interpretive structural modelling
136Jabarzadeh et al.2020A multi-objective mixed-integer linear model for sustainable fruit closed-loop supply chain networkClosed-loop network, multi-objective optimization, reverse logistics, sustainable supply chains* Multi-objective mixed-integerLinear programming model
* LP-Metric and weighted Tchebycheff method
NONE

References

  1. Liu, R.H. Potential synergy of phytochemicals in cancer prevention: Mechanism of action. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 3479–3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. World Health Organization. Promoting Fruit and Vegetable Consumption around the World. Available online: https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/fruit/en/ (accessed on 1 August 2020).
  3. Salunkhe, D.K.; Wu, M.T.; Rahman, A.R. Developments in technology of storage and handling of fresh fruits and vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1974, 5, 15–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Council of Supply Chain Management Professional Supply Chain Management Definitions and Glossary. Available online: https://cscmp.org/CSCMP/Educate/SCM_Definitions_and_Glossary_of_Terms.aspx (accessed on 1 August 2020).
  5. Minnens, F.; Luijckx, N.L.; Verbeke, W. Food supply chain stakeholders’ perspectives on sharing information to detect and prevent food integrity issues. Foods 2019, 8, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Elghannam, A.; Mesias, F.J.; Escribano, M.; Fouad, L.; Horrillo, A.; Escribano, A.J. Consumers’ perspectives on alternative short food supply chains based on social media: A focus group study in Spain. Foods 2020, 9, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. McKinsey & Company Agriculture Sector: Preparing for Disruption in the Food Value Chain. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/agriculture/our-insights/agriculture-sector-preparing-for-disruption-in-the-food-value-chain (accessed on 8 December 2021).
  8. Deloitte the Future of Fresh Food Supply Chain. Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/au/en/pages/consumer-business/articles/future-of-fresh-food.html (accessed on 8 December 2021).
  9. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Building a Common Vision for Sustainable Food and Agriculture. Principles and Approaches; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  10. OECD. Global Value Chains in Agriculture and Food: A Synthesis of OECD Analysis; OECD: Paris, France, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. Neven, D. Developing Sustainable Food Value Chains: Guiding Principles; Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2014; ISBN 9789251084816. [Google Scholar]
  12. Townsend, R.; Ronchi, L.; Brett, C.; Moses, G. Future of Food: Maximizing Finance for Development in Agricultural Value Chains; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  13. United Nations. The 17 GOALS|Sustainable Development. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 1 August 2020).
  14. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). FRuit and Vegetables—Your Dietary Essentials. The International Year of Fruits and Vegetables; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  15. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. VOSviewer Manual; Univeristeit Leiden: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wermund, U.; Fearne, A. Key Challenges Facing the Cherry Supply Chain in the UK. Acta Hortic. 2000, 536, 613–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hewett, E.W. Perceptions of supply chain management for perishable horticultural crops: An introduction. Acta Hortic. 2003, 604, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hingley, M. Relationship Development in the UK Fresh Produce Supply Chain Relationship Development in the UK Fresh Produce Supply Chain. J. Mark. Channels 2004, 12, 27–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maruyama, M.; Hirogaki, M. The evolution of fresh produce supply chains: From spot markets to contracts. Int. Rev. Retail. Distrib. Consum. Res. 2007, 17, 359–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mergenthaler, M.; Qaim, M.; Weinberger, K. Consumer demand for fruits and vegetables from modern supply chains in vietnam. Acta Hortic. 2008, 794, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Clements, M.D.; Lazo, R.M.; Martin, S.K. Relationship connectors in NZ fresh produce supply chains. Br. Food J. 2008, 110, 346–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, F.; Zhang, X.; Guo, X.; Fu, Z. VegRisk: A decision support system for risk management of vegetable supply chain. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, ICNSC, Sanya, China, 6–8 April 2008; pp. 1547–1552. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zúñiga-Arias, G.; Ruben, R.; van Boekel, M. Managing quality heterogeneity in the mango supply chain: Evidence from Costa Rica. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 20, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cadilhon, J.J.; Fearne, A.P.; Tam, P.T.G.; Moustier, P.; Poole, N.D. Market linkages: Characterizing business-to-business relationships in vietnamese vegetable supply chains. Acta Hortic. 2009, 809, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stringer, R.; Sang, N.; Croppenstedt, A. Producers, Processors, and Procurement Decisions: The Case of Vegetable Supply Chains in China. World Dev. 2009, 37, 1773–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Galli, F.; Bartolini, F.; Brunori, G.; Colombo, L.; Gava, O.; Grando, S.; Marescotti, A. Sustainability assessment of food supply chains: An application to local and global bread in Italy. Agric. Food Econ. 2015, 3, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Verdouw, C.N.; Beulens, A.J.M.; Trienekens, J.H.; Wolfert, J. Process modelling in demand-driven supply chains: A reference model for the fruit industry. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2010, 73, 174–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiao, Z.; Shen, Y. Study on Market Equilibrium of Sealed Supply Chain Based on Willingness to Pay for Food Safety. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Logistics Engineering and Management (ICLEM) 2010, Chengdu, China, 8–10 October 2010; pp. 4683–4690. [Google Scholar]
  30. Samuel, M.V.; Shah, M.; Sahay, B.S. An insight into agri-food supply chains: A review. Int. J. Value Chain Manag. 2012, 6, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fizzanty, T.; Russell, I.; Collins, R. Learning from failed supply chains: The application of complex adaptive systems and a modified SAFE framework in evaluating proposed system improvements. Int. J. Agil. Syst. Manag. 2013, 6, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cai, X.; Chen, J.; Xiao, Y.; Xu, X.; Yu, G. Fresh-product supply chain management with logistics outsourcing. Omega 2013, 41, 752–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kundu, S.; Kar, A. Identifying the physical distribution form and supply chain issues in marketing F&V products by organised supermarkets: A case on reliance distribution model. Int. J. Bus. Perform. Manag. 2013, 14, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Götz, L.; Von Cramon-Taubadel, S.; Kachel, Y. Vertical price transmission in the international fresh fruit and vegetable supply chain: Israeli grapefruit exports to the EU after export liberalisation. Q. J. Int. Agric. 2014, 53, 99–120. [Google Scholar]
  35. Bahinipati, B.K. The procurement perspectives of fruits and vegetables supply chain planning. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2014, 3, 111–131. [Google Scholar]
  36. Obeth, E.; Batt, P.J.; Butler, B. Non-attractiveness of modern supply chains. Acta Hortic. 2015, 1103, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Chen, W.C.; Li, J.; Wen, D. ping Investigating the robustness of the agricultural supply chain based on colored Petri nets. Simulation 2015, 91, 898–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aysoy, C.; Kirli, D.H.; Tumen, S. How does a shorter supply chain affect pricing of fresh food? Evidence from a natural experiment. Food Policy 2015, 57, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Karyani, T.; Utami, H.N.; Sadeli, A.H.; Rasmikayati, E.; Syamsiyah, N. Mango agricultural supply chain: Actors, business process, and financing scheme. Int. J. Appl. Bus. Econ. Res. 2016, 14, 7751–7764. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gamboa, G.; Kovacic, Z.; Di Masso, M.; Mingorría, S.; Gomiero, T.; Rivera-Ferré, M.; Giampietro, M. The Complexity of Food Systems: Defining Relevant Attributes and Indicators for the Evaluation of Food Supply Chains in Spain. Sustainability 2016, 8, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Webb, T. Towards an agri-food ‘culture’: Managing the impact on agricultural supply chains of changes in consumer culture. In World Sustainable Development Outlook 2007; Routledge: London, UK, 2017; pp. 344–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Negi, S.; Anand, N. Factors leading to supply chain inefficiency in agribusiness: Evidence from Asia’s largest wholesale market. Int. J. Value Chain Manag. 2018, 9, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Siddh, M.M.; Soni, G.; Jain, R.; Sharma, M.K. Structural model of perishable food supply chain quality (PFSCQ) to improve sustainable organizational performance. Benchmarking 2018, 25, 2272–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Singh, R.; Centobelli, P.; Cerchione, R. Evaluating partnerships in sustainability-oriented food supply chain: A five-stage performance measurement model. Energies 2018, 11, 3473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Arshinder, K.; Balaji, M. Understanding the models of Indian fruit and vegetable supply chains-A case study approach. Int. J. Agric. Resour. Gov. Ecol. 2019, 15, 307–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nakandala, D.; Lau, H.C.W. Innovative adoption of hybrid supply chain strategies in urban local fresh food supply chain. Supply Chain Manag. 2019, 24, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cao, Y.; Mohiuddin, M. Sustainable Emerging Country Agro-Food Supply Chains: Fresh Vegetable Price Formation Mechanisms in Rural China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Negi, S.; Anand, N. Wholesalers perspectives on mango supply chain efficiency in India. J. Agribus. Dev. Emerg. Econ. 2019, 9, 175–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pavez, I.; Codron, J.-M.; Lubello, P.; Florêncio, M.C. Biosecurity institutions and the choice of contracts in international fruit supply chains. Agric. Syst. 2019, 176, 102668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nedumaran, S.; Selvaraj, A.; Nandi, R.; Suchiradipta, B.; Jyosthnaa, P.; Bose, D. Digital integration to enhance market efficiency and inclusion of smallholder farmers: A proposed model for fresh fruit and vegetable supply chain. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 2020, 23, 319–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Waqas, U.; Rahman, A.A.; Ismail, N.W.; Basha, N.K. Underlying Dimensions of Supply Chain Risks Amongst Agropreneurs of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the 2020 the 3rd International Conference on Computers in Management and Business, Tokyo, Japan, 31 January–2 February 2020; pp. 248–252. [Google Scholar]
  52. Digal, L.N. Quality grading in the supply chain: The case of vegetables in Southern Philippines. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2005, 17, 71–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Russell, L.F.; Leblanc, D.I.; McRae, K.B.; Ryan, D.A.J. Losses of vitamin C from fresh strawberries in a commercial supply chain. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cai, X.; Chen, J.; Xiao, Y.; Xu, X. Optimization and coordination of fresh product supply chains with freshness-keeping effort. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2010, 19, 261–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jacxsens, L.; Luning, P.A.; van der Vorst, J.G.A.J.; Devlieghere, F.; Leemans, R.; Uyttendaele, M. Simulation modelling and risk assessment as tools to identify the impact of climate change on microbiological food safety—The case study of fresh produce supply chain. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1925–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Diez-Valcarce, M.; Kovač, K.; Cook, N.; Rodríguez-Lázaro, D.; Hernández, M. Construction and Analytical Application of Internal Amplification Controls (IAC) for Detection of Food Supply Chain-Relevant Viruses by Real-Time PCR-Based Assays. Food Anal. Methods 2011, 4, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Li, Y.T.; Qiao, Z. Preservation behavior decision of fruits and vegetables supply chain. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management: Theory and Apply of Industrial Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 1103–1108. [Google Scholar]
  58. Jraisat, L.E.; Sawalha, I.H. Quality control and supply chain management: A contextual perspective and a case study. Supply Chain Manag. 2013, 18, 194–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Macheka, L.; Ngadze, R.T.; Manditsera, F.A.; Mubaiwa, J.; Musundire, R. Identifying causes of mechanical defects and critical control points in fruit supply chains: An overview of a banana supply chain. Int. J. Postharvest Technol. Innov. 2013, 3, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sivakumar, D.; Wall, M.M. Papaya Fruit Quality Management during the Postharvest Supply Chain. Food Rev. Int. 2013, 29, 24–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bill, M.; Sivakumar, D.; Thompson, A.K.; Korsten, L. Avocado Fruit Quality Management during the Postharvest Supply Chain. Food Rev. Int. 2014, 30, 169–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Blanke, M.M. Reducing ethylene levels along the food supply chain: A key to reducing food waste? J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 2357–2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Janssen, S.; Schmitt, K.; Blanke, M.; Bauersfeld, M.L.; Wöllenstein, J.; Lang, W. Ethylene detection in fruit supply chains. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2014, 372, 20130311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Leblanc, D.I.; Villeneuve, S.; Beni, L.H.; Otten, A.; Fazil, A.; McKellar, R.; Delaquis, P. A national produce supply chain database for food safety risk analysis. J. Food Eng. 2015, 147, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ait Hou, M.; Grazia, C.; Malorgio, G. Food safety standards and international supply chain organization: Acase study of the Moroccan fruit and vegetable exports. Food Control 2015, 55, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Haoran, S.; Kejian, L.; Haihua, P.; Yang, Y. Fuzzy TOPSIS-based supply chain optimization of fresh agricultural products. Adv. Model. Anal. A 2016, 53, 186–203. [Google Scholar]
  67. Zoellner, C.; Venegas, F.; Churey, J.J.; Dávila-Aviña, J.; Grohn, Y.T.; García, S.; Heredia, N.; Worobo, R.W. Microbial dynamics of indicator microorganisms on fresh tomatoes in the supply chain from Mexico to the USA. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 238, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ramanathan, A.; Panneerselvam, G.; Parthasarathy, R. A study on sources of vegetable supply chain wastage with specific reference to retail outlets in Tamil Nadu. Int. J. Bus. Excell. 2017, 11, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gardas, B.B.; Raut, R.D.; Narkhede, B. Modeling causal factors of post-harvesting losses in vegetable and fruit supply chain: An Indian perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 80, 1355–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jacxsens, L.; Uyttendaele, M.; Luning, P.; Allende, A. Food safety management and risk assessment in the fresh produce supply chain. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Surakarta, Indonesia, 18–19 October 2016; Volume 193. [Google Scholar]
  71. Orjuela-Castro, J.; Adarme-Jaimes, W. Evaluating the Supply Chain Design of Fresh Food on Food Security and Logistics. In Applied Computer Sciences in Engineering; Figueroa-García, J.C., López-Santana, E.R., Rodriguez-Molano, J.I., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 257–269. [Google Scholar]
  72. Fabbri, S.; Olsen, S.I.; Owsianiak, M. Improving environmental performance of post-harvest supply chains of fruits and vegetables in Europe: Potential contribution from ultrasonic humidification. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 182, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Mercier, S.; Uysal, I. Neural network models for predicting perishable food temperatures along the supply chain. Biosyst. Eng. 2018, 171, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zoellner, C.; Al-mamun, M.A.; Grohn, Y.; Jackson, P.; Worobo, R. Postharvest Supply Chain with Microbial Travelers: A Farm-to- Retail Microbial Simulation and Visualization Framework. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Hernández-Rubio, J.; Pérez-Mesa, J.C.; Piedra-Muñoz, L.; Galdeano-Gómez, E. Determinants of food safety level in fruit and vegetable wholesalers’ supply chain: Evidence from Spain and France. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Kelly, K.; Madden, R.; Emond, J.P.; do Nascimento Nunes, M.C. A novel approach to determine the impact level of each step along the supply chain on strawberry quality. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2019, 147, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Diaz-Ruiz, R.; Costa-Font, M.; López-i-Gelats, F.; Gil, J.M. Food waste prevention along the food supply chain: A multi-actor approach to identify effective solutions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 149, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Caldeira, C.; De Laurentiis, V.; Corrado, S.; van Holsteijn, F.; Sala, S. Quantification of food waste per product group along the food supply chain in the European Union: A mass flow analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 149, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, Y.; Chu, F.; Che, A.; Yu, Y.; Feng, X. Novel model and kernel search heuristic for multi-period closed-loop food supply chain planning with returnable transport items. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 7439–7456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Xu, X.; Guo, W.G.; Rodgers, M.D. A real-time decision support framework to mitigate degradation in perishable supply chains. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 150, 106905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hingley, M. Relationship Management in the Supply Chain. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2001, 12, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Louw, A.; Jordaan, D.; Ndanga, L.; Kirsten, J.F. Alternative marketing options for small-scale farmers in the wake of changing agri-food supply chains in South Africa. Agrekon 2008, 47, 287–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Arumugam, N.; Fatimah, M.A.; Chiew, E.F.C.; Zainalabidin, M. Supply chain analysis of fresh fruits and vegetables (FFV): Prospects of contract farming. Agric. Econ. 2010, 56, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Schipmann, C.; Qaim, M. Supply chain differentiation, contract agriculture, and farmers’ marketing preferences: The case of sweet pepper in Thailand. Food Policy 2011, 36, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sayin, C.; Ozkan, B.; Ceylan, R.F. The role of wholesale markets in the supply chain for fresh fruit and vegetables in Turkey. Acta Hortic. 2011, 895, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Guarín, A. The value of domestic supply chains: Producers, wholesalers, and urban consumers in Colombia. Dev. Policy Rev. 2013, 31, 511–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Schuster, M.; Maertens, M. Do private standards create exclusive supply chains? New evidence from the Peruvian asparagus export sector. Food Policy 2013, 43, 291–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Wahyudin, R.S.; Sutopo, W.; Hisjam, M.; Yuniaristanto, K. B: An agri-food supply chain model for cultivating the capabilities of farmers in accessing capital using corporate social responsibility program. Lect. Notes Eng. Comput. Sci. 2015, 2, 877–882. [Google Scholar]
  89. Jacob-John, J.; Veerapa, N. Perception of fairness within organic fresh produce supply chains: The case of small and medium fresh produce retailers. Acta Hortic. 2016, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Michelson, H.; Boucher, S.; Cheng, X.; Huang, J.; Jia, X. Connecting supermarkets and farms: The role of intermediaries in Walmart China’s fresh produce supply chains. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2018, 33, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Devin, B.; Richards, C. Food Waste, Power, and Corporate Social Responsibility in the Australian Food Supply Chain. J. Bus. Ethics 2018, 150, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Elder, S.D. The impact of supermarket supply chain governance on smallholder farmer cooperatives: The case of Walmart in Nicaragua. Agric. Hum. Values 2019, 36, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Salvia, L. The restructuring of Italian agriculture and its impact upon capital–labour relations: Labour contracting and exploitation in the fresh fruit and vegetable supply chain of the Lazio Region, Central Italy. J. Agrar. Chang. 2020, 20, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Gunarathna, R.T.; Bandara, Y.M. Post Harvest Losses and the Role of Intermediaries in the Vegetable Supply Chain. In Proceedings of the 2020 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon), Moratuwa, Sri Lanka, 28–30 July 2020; pp. 378–383. [Google Scholar]
  95. Rajurkar, S.W.; Jain, R. Food supply chain management: Review, classification and analysis of literature. Int. J. Integr. Supply Manag. 2011, 6, 33–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kong, X.T.R.; Huang, G.; Luo, H. Auction logistics in perishable supply chain trading: A research agenda. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, CIE, Hong Kong, China, 16–18 October 2013; Volume 1, pp. 305–319. [Google Scholar]
  97. Aung, M.M.; Chang, Y.S. Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives. Food Control 2014, 39, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sibomana, M.S.; Workneh, T.S.; Audain, K. A review of postharvest handling and losses in the fresh tomato supply chain: A focus on Sub-Saharan Africa. Food Secur. 2016, 8, 389–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Siddh, M.M.; Soni, G.; Jain, R.; Sharma, M.K.; Yadav, V. Agri-fresh food supply chain quality (AFSCQ): A literature review. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017, 117, 2015–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Routroy, S.; Behera, A. Agriculture supply chain: A systematic review of literature and implications for future research. J. Agribus. Dev. Emerg. Econ. 2017, 7, 275–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Raak, N.; Symmank, C.; Zahn, S.; Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Rohm, H. Processing- and product-related causes for food waste and implications for the food supply chain. Waste Manag. 2017, 61, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Saitone, T.L.; Sexton, R.J. Agri-food supply chain: Evolution and performance with conflicting consumer and societal demands. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2017, 44, 634–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Gharehgozli, A.; Iakovou, E.; Chang, Y.; Swaney, R. Trends in global E-food supply chain and implications for transport: Literature review and research directions. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2017, 25, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Luo, J.; Ji, C.; Qiu, C.; Jia, F. Agri-food supply chain management: Bibliometric and content analyses. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Corrado, S.; Sala, S. Food waste accounting along global and European food supply chains: State of the art and outlook. Waste Manag. 2018, 79, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lezoche, M.; Panetto, H.; Kacprzyk, J.; Hernandez, J.E.; Alemany Díaz, M.M.E. Agri-food 4.0: A survey of the Supply Chains and Technologies for the Future Agriculture. Comput. Ind. 2020, 117, 103187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Priyadarshi, R.; Routroy, S.; Garg, G.K. Postharvest supply chain losses: A state-of-the-art literature review and bibliometric analysis. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 2020, 18, 443–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Duan, Y.; Xu, X.; Liu, X.; Zografos, K.; Bemeleit, B. Accelerating internet adoption in China’s fresh produce supply chain: A vegnet approach. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 2007, 50, 1299–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hu, J.; Chen, W.; Yuan, J.; Zhang, J. AgriRiskIDSS: Development of an intelligent decision support system for price risk management of agricultural product supply chain. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2011, 9, 299–303. [Google Scholar]
  110. Solanki, M.; Brewster, C. Enhancing visibility in EPCIS governing agri-food supply chains via linked pedigrees. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 2014, 10, 45–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Qian, K.; Kong, N.; Wang, K.; Zheng, L.; Shi, Y.; Engels, D.W. Enterprise-oriented IoT name service for agricultural product supply chain management. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2015, 11, 308165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. La Scalia, G.; Nasca, A.; Corona, O.; Settanni, L.; Micale, R. An Innovative Shelf Life Model Based on Smart Logistic Unit for an Efficient Management of the Perishable Food Supply Chain. J. Food Process Eng. 2017, 40, e12311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Borrero, J.D. Agri-food supply chain traceability for fruit and vegetable cooperatives using Blockchain technology. CIRIEC-Esp. Rev. Econ. Publica Soc. Coop. 2019, 95, 71–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Pal, A.; Kant, K. Smart sensing, communication, and control in perishable food supply chain. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 2020, 16, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Goisser, S.; Mempel, H.; Bitsch, V. Food-Scanners as a Radical Innovation in German Fresh Produce Supply Chains. Int. J. Food Syst. Dyn. 2020, 11, 101–116. [Google Scholar]
  116. United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Agriculture Technology. Available online: https://nifa.usda.gov/topic/agriculture-technology (accessed on 7 October 2020).
  117. Ahvenainen, R. Novel Food Packaging Techniques; Elsevier: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003; ISBN 1855737027. [Google Scholar]
  118. Singh, S.P.; Chonhenchob, V.; Singh, J. Life cycle inventory and analysis of re-usable plastic containers and display-ready corrugated containers used for packaging fresh fruits and vegetables. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2006, 19, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Accorsi, R.; Cascini, A.; Cholette, S.; Manzini, R.; Mora, C. Economic and environmental assessment of reusable plastic containers: A food catering supply chain case study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014, 152, 88–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Battini, D.; Calzavara, M.; Persona, A.; Sgarbossa, F. Sustainable Packaging Development for Fresh Food Supply Chains. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2016, 29, 25–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Giuggioli, N.R.; Girgenti, V.; Briano, R.; Peano, C. Sustainable supply-chain: Evolution of the quality characteristics of strawberries stored in green film packaging. CyTA-J. Food 2017, 15, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Bortolini, M.; Galizia, F.G.; Mora, C.; Botti, L.; Rosano, M. Bi-objective design of fresh food supply chain networks with reusable and disposable packaging containers. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 184, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zhao, X.; Xia, M.; Wei, X.; Xu, C.; Luo, Z.; Mao, L. Consolidated cold and modified atmosphere package system for fresh strawberry supply chains. LWT 2019, 109, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Busato, P.; Berruto, R. FruitGame: Simulation Model to Study the Supply Chain Logistics for Fresh Produce. In Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources, Proceedings of the 4th World Congress Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 24–26 July 2006; ASABE: St. Joseph, MI, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  125. Yan, L. The Research of Supply Chain Logistics Management on Fruit E-Commerce Website. Logistics 2009, 2139–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Etemadnia, H.; Goetz, S.J.; Canning, P.; Tavallali, M.S. Optimal wholesale facilities location within the fruit and vegetables supply chain with bimodal transportation options: An LP-MIP heuristic approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2015, 244, 648–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Chandrasekaran, M.; Ranganathan, R. Modelling and optimisation of Indian traditional agriculture supply chain to reduce post-harvest loss and CO2 emission. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017, 117, 1817–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Ghezavati, V.R.; Hooshyar, S.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. A Benders’ decomposition algorithm for optimizing distribution of perishable products considering postharvest biological behavior in agri-food supply chain: A case study of tomato. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2017, 25, 29–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Mejjaouli, S.; Babiceanu, R.F. Cold supply chain logistics: System optimization for real-time rerouting transportation solutions. Comput. Ind. 2018, 95, 68–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Smith, B.G. Developing sustainable food supply chains. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2008, 363, 849–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Styles, D.; Schoenberger, H.; Galvez-Martos, J.L. Environmental improvement of product supply chains: Proposed best practice techniques, quantitative indicators and benchmarks of excellence for retailers. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 110, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Naik, G.; Suresh, D.N. Challenges of creating sustainable agri-retail supply chains. IIMB Manag. Rev. 2018, 30, 270–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Blanc, S.; Massaglia, S.; Brun, F.; Peano, C.; Mosso, A.; Giuggioli, N.R. Use of bio-based plastics in the fruit supply chain: An integrated approach to assess environmental, economic, and social sustainability. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. De Corato, U.; Cancellara, F.A. Measures, technologies, and incentives for cleaning the minimally processed fruits and vegetables supply chain in the Italian food industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 237, 117735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Slamet, A.S.; Hadiguna, R.A.; Mulyati, H. Making food supply chain sustainable: Participating smallholder farmers in modern retail channels. Int. J. Sustain. Agric. Manag. Inform. 2020, 6, 135–162. [Google Scholar]
  136. Jabarzadeh, Y.; Yamchi, H.R. A multi-objective mixed-integer linear model for sustainable fruit closed-loop supply chain network. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2020, 31, 1351–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). What Is Sustainable Food Value Chain Development? Available online: https://www.fao.org/sustainable-food-value-chains/what-is-it/en/ (accessed on 1 December 2021).
  138. Commission on Sustainable Agriculture Intensification (CSAI). Paying for Nature and Society: Innovation in Financial Incentives for a Sustainable and Inclusive Transition in Agriculture. Available online: https://wle.cgiar.org/cosai/news/paying-nature-and-society-innovation-financial-incentives-sustainable-and-inclusive-transition (accessed on 1 December 2021).
  139. Handfield, R.B.; Nichols, E.L., Jr. Supply Chain Management: Transforming Supply Chains into Integrated “Value Systems.” In Supply Chain Redesign: Transforming Supply Chains into Integrated Value Systems; Financial Times Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2002; pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  140. Porter, M.E. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance; Macmillan Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  141. Galanakis, C.M. The Food Systems in the Era of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Crisis. Foods 2020, 9, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Giudice, F.; Caferra, R.; Morone, P. COVID-19, the Food System and the Circular Economy: Challenges and Opportunities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Swanepoel, L.; Tioti, T.; Eria, T.; Tamuera, K.; Tiitii, U.; Larson, S.; Paul, N. Supporting women’s participation in developing a seaweed supply chain in Kiribati for health and nutrition. Foods 2020, 9, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. KPMG. Agri-Food Supply Chain Disruption. Available online: https://home.kpmg/in/en/blogs/home/posts/2021/11/agriculture-resilience-eco-system-e-marketplace-mantra.html (accessed on 8 December 2021).
  145. Dijital Tarım Pazarı. Available online: https://ditap.gov.tr/ditap-nedir.html (accessed on 17 November 2020).
Figure 1. Line chart of the number of articles that studied “supply chain” in the years between 2000 and 2020.
Figure 1. Line chart of the number of articles that studied “supply chain” in the years between 2000 and 2020.
Sustainability 14 01573 g001
Figure 2. Line chart of the number of articles that studied FFVSC in the years between 2000 and 2020.
Figure 2. Line chart of the number of articles that studied FFVSC in the years between 2000 and 2020.
Sustainability 14 01573 g002
Figure 3. Number of articles published by journal (first 13 publication sources are listed).
Figure 3. Number of articles published by journal (first 13 publication sources are listed).
Sustainability 14 01573 g003
Figure 4. Network visualization of the studies where the co-occurrence of keywords is featured.
Figure 4. Network visualization of the studies where the co-occurrence of keywords is featured.
Sustainability 14 01573 g004
Figure 5. Overlay visualization of the studies by year.
Figure 5. Overlay visualization of the studies by year.
Sustainability 14 01573 g005
Table 1. Categories of the articles and the numbers of articles involved.
Table 1. Categories of the articles and the numbers of articles involved.
Categories of the Articles ConsideredNumber of Articles
Value Chain Indicators of FFVSCs35
Food-Related Problems/Postharvest Losses along the FFVSC29
Role of Parties Involved in the FFV Value Chain14
Review Papers13
Technological Trends in the FFVSC8
Packaging Issues of the FFVSC6
Logistics Solutions of the FFVSC6
Sustainable FFVSCs7
Total118
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tort, Ö.Ö.; Vayvay, Ö.; Çobanoğlu, E. A Systematic Review of Sustainable Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Supply Chains. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1573. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031573

AMA Style

Tort ÖÖ, Vayvay Ö, Çobanoğlu E. A Systematic Review of Sustainable Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Supply Chains. Sustainability. 2022; 14(3):1573. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031573

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tort, Ömer Özgür, Özalp Vayvay, and Emine Çobanoğlu. 2022. "A Systematic Review of Sustainable Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Supply Chains" Sustainability 14, no. 3: 1573. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031573

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop