Consumers’ Continuous Use Intention of O2O E-Commerce Platform on Community: A Value Co-Creation Perspective
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Hypothesis
2.1. Theory
2.1.1. Technology Acceptance Model
2.1.2. Theory of Planned Behavior
2.1.3. Co-Creation Value
2.2. Research Hypothesis
2.2.1. Social Factors
2.2.2. Platform Factors
2.2.3. User Factors
2.2.4. Co-Creation Factors
2.2.5. Intermediary Effect
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
4.1. Evaluation of Measurement Model
4.2. Direct Effect Test
4.3. Intermediary Effect Test
5. Conclusions and Implications
5.1. Conclusions and Discussion
5.2. Practical Implications
5.3. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Items | Statistics | Items | Statistics |
---|---|---|---|
CB1 | 1167 | PS1 | 1104 |
CB2 | 1162 | PS2 | 1094 |
CB3 | 1154 | PS3 | 1094 |
SN1 | 1092 | CV1 | 1121 |
SN2 | 1128 | CV2 | 1136 |
SN3 | 1169 | CV3 | 1095 |
SA1 | 1163 | SA1 | 1052 |
SA2 | 1121 | SA2 | 1065 |
SA3 | 1130 | SA3 | 1086 |
PC1 | 1121 | CI1 | 1155 |
PC2 | 1083 | CI2 | 1133 |
PC3 | 1097 | CI3 | 1119 |
CI4 | 1131 |
References
- Yongrok, C. Sustainable Management of Online to Offline Delivery Apps for Consumers’ Reuse Intention: Focused on the Meituan Apps. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3593. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.; Liu, F.; Tang, J.F.; Li, Y.H. The online integrated order picking and delivery considering Pickers’ learning effects for an O2O community supermarket. Transp. Res. Part E 2019, 123, 180–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, L.; Mi, C.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, J. Examining Consumers’ Behavioral Intention in O2O Commerce from a Relational Perspective: An Exploratory Study. Inf. Syst. Front. 2019, 21, 1045–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yusuf, S.A.; Ab, R.H.; Halina, M.D. Electronic Word of Mouth engagement in social commerce platforms: An empirical study. Inf. Dev. 2020, 36, 438–456. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, J.W.; Namkung, Y. The information quality and source credibility matter in customers’ evaluation toward food O2O commerce. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 78, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, L.; Wang, M.L.; Gong, S.L. Understanding the Antecedents of Organic Food Purchases: The Important Roles of Beliefs, Subjective Norms, and Identity Expressiveness. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, J.; Zhang, C.; Xu, Y.J. The Role of Mutual Trust in Building Members’ Loyalty to a C2C Platform Provider. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2009, 14, 147–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z.; Chen, M.L.; Zhang, W.K. Social Community, Personal Involvement and Psychological Processes: A Study of Impulse Buying in the Online Shopping Carnival. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 2019, 20, 255–272. [Google Scholar]
- Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. J. Mark. 1988, 52, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luqmani, M.; Yavas, U.; Quraeshi, Z.A. A convenience-oriented approach to country segmentation. J. Consum. Mark. 1994, 11, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, X.; Amar, R.; Wang, W. More Haste, Less Speed: How to Update Frequency of Mobile Apps Influences Consumer Interest. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 2922–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Li, R.; Gan, M.; Fu, Z.; Yuan, F. Public acceptance of driverless buses in china: An empirical analysis based on an extended UTAUT model. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2020, 43, 81–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hui, K.L.; Bernard, C.Y.; TGoh, C.Y. Online information disclosure: Motivators and measurements. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 2006, 6, 415–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Wei, K.K. An empirical study of product differences in consumers’ E-commerce adoption behavior. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2003, 2, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Satyabhusan, D.; Saji, K.B. The role of consumer self-efficacy and Website social-presence in customers’ adoption of B2C online shopping an empirical study in the India context. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2007, 20, 33–49. [Google Scholar]
- Kuhlmeter, D.; Knight, G. Antecedents to internet-based purchasing: A multinational study. Int. Mark. Rev. 2005, 22, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mcknight, D.H.; Chervany, N.L. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2002, 6, 35–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Meister, D.B.; Gray, P.H. Social Influence and Knowledge Management Systems Use: Evidence from Panel Data. MIS Q. 2013, 37, 299–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, H.T.; Bagozzi, R.P. Contribution Behavior in Virtual Communities: Cognitive, Emotional, and Social Influences. MIS Q. 2014, 38, 143–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prahalad, C.K.; Ramaswamy, V. Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. J. Interact. Mark. 2004, 18, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kumari, A.; Loveleen, G.; Gurmeet, S. Impact of customer experience on attitude and repurchase intention in online grocery retailing: A moderation mechanism of value Co-creation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 64, 102798. [Google Scholar]
- Haksin, C.; Morgan, X.Y.; Kevin, J.Z. Bolstering ratings and reviews systems on multi-sided platforms: A co-creation perspective. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 139, 208–217. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.X. An empirical study of continuous use behavior in virtual learning community. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0235814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cai, J.; Zhao, Y.P.; Sun, J.H. Factors Influencing Fitness App Users’ Behavior in China. Int. J. Hum. –Comput. Interact. 2021, 38, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, O.; Simon, S.; Sylvain, C. Food choice in the e-commerce era: A comparison between business-to-consumer (B2C), online-to-offline (O2O) and new retail. Br. Food J. 2020, 122, 1215–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.X.; Chen, X.Y. Study on the Satisfaction of Consumers with Online Ordering Services and Its Influencing Factors in O2O mode: A Microcosmic Perspective on the Provision of Takeout Services. Rev. De Cercet. Si Interv. Soc. 2018, 63, 230–253. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, S.H.; Bae, J.H.; Jeon, H.M. Continuous Intention on Accommodation Apps: Integrated Value-Based Adoption and Expectation–Confirmation Model Analysis. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nikhashemi, S.R.; Tarofder, A.K.; Gaur, S.S.; Haque, A. The Effect of Customers’ Perceived Value of Retail Store on Relationship between Store Attribute and Customer Brand Loyalty: Some Insights from Malaysia. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2016, 37, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shang, D.; Wu, W. Understanding mobile shopping consumers’ continuance intention. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017, 117, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargo, S.L.; Lusch, R.F. Evolving to a new dominant logic for Marketing. J. Mark. 2004, 68, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hoyer, W.D.; Chandy, R.; Dorotic, M.; Krafft, M.; Singh, S.S. Consumer cocreation in new product development. J. Serv. Res. 2010, 13, 283–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, K.W.; Yim, C.K.; Lam, S.K. Is customer participation in value creation a double-edged sword? evidence from professional financial services across cultures. J. Mark. 2010, 74, 48–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chang, C.C.; Chen, H.Y.; Huang, I.C. The interplay between customer participation and difficulty of design examples in the online designing process and its effect on customer satisfaction: Mediational analyses. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2009, 12, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wallbacks, L. Multivariate data analysis of multivariate populations. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2007, 86, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, Y.; Gong, T. Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 1279–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacherjee, A. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 2001, 25, 351–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurnia, S.; Johnston, R.B. The need for a processual view of inter-organizational systems adoption. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2000, 9, 295–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berry, L.L.; Seiders, K.; Grewal, D. Understanding service convenience. J. Mark. 2002, 66, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suryandari, R.T.; Paswan, A.K. Online customer service and retail type-product congruence. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2014, 21, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’cass, A.; Ngo, L.V. Creating superior customer value for B2B firms through supplier firm capabilities. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2012, 41, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picón, A.; Castro, I.; Roldán, J.L. The relationship between satisfaction and loyalty: A mediator analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2014, 67, 746–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacherjee, A. An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decis. Support Syst. 2001, 32, 201–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbaz, H.; Li, Y.; Li, W.L. Psychological contract-based Consumer Repurchase behavior On Social commerce platform: An Empirical Study. Ksll Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 2020, 14, 2061–2083. [Google Scholar]
- Shahab, M.H.; Ghazali, E.; Mohtar, M. The role of elaboration likelihood model in consumer behaviour research and its extension to new technologies: A review and future research agenda. Inf. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45, 664–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, T.; Li, H. Understanding Mobile SNS Continuance Usage in China from the Perspectives of Social Influence and Privacy Concern. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 37, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miyazaki, A.; Fernandze, A. Consumer Perceptions of Privacy and Security Risks for Online Shopping. J. Consum. Aff. 2001, 35, 27–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ueland, O.; Gunnlaugsdottir, H.; Holm, F.; Kalogeras, N.; Leino, O.; Luteijn, J.M.; Magnusson, S.H.; Odekerken, G.; Pohjola, M.V.; Tijhuis, M.J.; et al. State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Consumer perception. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 50, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Reference | Item | Factor Load | Cronbach’s α |
---|---|---|---|---|
Co-creation Behavior (CB) | Yi and Gong [36] | I often reflect the product experience to platform | 0.892 | 0.931 |
I think the platform is good for connecting people in the community | 0.905 | |||
When I encounter problems, I negotiate with the platform to solve them | 0.904 | |||
Social Subjective Norms (SN) | Bhattacherjee [37] | Many people around me use O2O e-commerce in the community | 0.945 | 0.881 |
I was often influenced by media reports | 0.832 | |||
I often read buyers’ comments | 0.796 | |||
Social Structure Assurance (SA) | Kurnia [38] | I think the existing laws can protect consumer rights very well | 0.805 | 0.887 |
I think O2O e-commerce on the community is regulated in many ways | 0.860 | |||
I think offline stores are heavily regulated | 0.787 | |||
Platform Convenience (PC) | Berry [39] | I think the pick-up method of O2O e-commerce on the community is convenient | 0.870 | 0.857 |
I think there are many ways to pay for O2O e-commerce on the community | 0.896 | |||
I think the platform is simple and easy to use | 0.764 | |||
Platform Security (PS) | Suryandari [40] | I think the products and services provided by the platform are safe and reliable | 0.762 | 0.885 |
I believe the platform can protect personal information | 0.818 | |||
I am very confident about the payment method of the platform | 0.830 | |||
Customer Perceived Value (CV) | O’cass [41] | I think using O2O e-commerce in the community can save time and money | 0.838 | 0.919 |
I think the products and services provided by the platform are cost-effective | 0.857 | |||
I think the advent of the platform helped me solve many problems | 0.844 | |||
Customer Satisfaction (CS) | Picon [42] | I was satisfied with the consumption experience in O2O e-commerce on the community | 0.745 | 0.888 |
I think it is very wise to consume on this platform | 0.859 | |||
I had a great time buying on the platform | 0.830 | |||
Continuance Intention (CI) | Bhattacherjee [43] | I will continue to use the O2O e-commerce in the community | 0.796 | 0.903 |
I will continue to use the platform | 0.789 | |||
I will recommend the platform to friends and family | 0.770 | |||
I will maintain or increase the frequency of using the platform in the future | 0.757 |
Variable | CR | AVE | CB | SN | SA | PC | PS | CV | SA | CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB | 0.928 | 0.811 | 0.900 | |||||||
SN | 0.894 | 0.740 | 0.377 ** | 0.860 | ||||||
SA | 0.858 | 0.669 | 0.624 ** | 0.425 ** | 0.818 | |||||
PC | 0.882 | 0.714 | 0.695 ** | 0.394 ** | 0.763 ** | 0.845 | ||||
PS | 0.845 | 0.646 | 0.503 ** | 0.404 ** | 0.498 ** | 0.488 ** | 0.804 | |||
CV | 0.883 | 0.716 | 0.377 ** | 0.256 ** | 0.603 ** | 0.460 ** | 0.300 ** | 0.846 | ||
CS | 0.853 | 0.661 | 0.347 ** | 0.220 ** | 0.370 ** | 0.452 ** | 0.372 ** | 0.223 ** | 0.813 | |
CI | 0.860 | 0.606 | 0.693 ** | 0.593 ** | 0.684 ** | 0.724 ** | 0.664 ** | 0.528 ** | 0.541 ** | 0.778 |
Index | χ2/df | GFI | AGFI | IFI | CFI | RMSEA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Suggested indicators | <3 | >0.8 | >0.8 | >0.8 | >0.8 | <0.08 |
Actual value | 1.590 | 0.895 | 0.866 | 0.802 | 0.790 | 0.044 |
Hypothesis | Path | Path Coefficient | Standardized Path Coefficient | Standard Error | t-Value | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | SN → CI | 0.191 | 0.254 | 0.045 | 4.246 | *** |
H2 | SA → CI | 0.190 | 0.209 | 0.072 | 2.633 | 0.008 |
H3 | PC → CS | 0.244 | 0.355 | 0.068 | 3.589 | *** |
H4 | PC → CI | 0.126 | 0.191 | 0.056 | 2.235 | 0.025 |
H5 | PS → CS | 0.205 | 0.199 | 0.104 | 1.972 | 0.049 |
H6 | PS → CI | 0.231 | 0.234 | 0.059 | 3.923 | *** |
H7 | CV → CI | 0.167 | 0.182 | 0.054 | 3.075 | 0.002 |
H8 | CS →CI | 0.190 | 0.198 | 0.059 | 3.226 | 0.001 |
H9 | CB→CV | 0.429 | 0.603 | 0.082 | 5.210 | *** |
Hypothesis | Parameter | Path Coefficient | Standard Path Coefficient | Lower | Upper | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H10 | CB→CV→CI | 0.072 | 0.110 | 0.032 | 0.175 | 0.009 |
H11 | PC→CS→CI | 0.046 | 0.070 | 0.027 | 0.156 | 0.003 |
H12 | PA→CS→CI | 0.039 | 0.039 | 0.009 | 0.088 | 0.036 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhu, Y.; Wei, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Jiang, H. Consumers’ Continuous Use Intention of O2O E-Commerce Platform on Community: A Value Co-Creation Perspective. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1666. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031666
Zhu Y, Wei Y, Zhou Z, Jiang H. Consumers’ Continuous Use Intention of O2O E-Commerce Platform on Community: A Value Co-Creation Perspective. Sustainability. 2022; 14(3):1666. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031666
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhu, Yongming, Yaru Wei, Zhihao Zhou, and Hongbing Jiang. 2022. "Consumers’ Continuous Use Intention of O2O E-Commerce Platform on Community: A Value Co-Creation Perspective" Sustainability 14, no. 3: 1666. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031666
APA StyleZhu, Y., Wei, Y., Zhou, Z., & Jiang, H. (2022). Consumers’ Continuous Use Intention of O2O E-Commerce Platform on Community: A Value Co-Creation Perspective. Sustainability, 14(3), 1666. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031666