Cross-Border E-Commerce Trade and Industrial Clusters: Evidence from China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Mechanism of the Coordinated Development of Cross-Border E-Commerce and Industrial Clusters
2.1. Analysis of Components
2.2. Analysis of the Mechanism of Collaborative Development
3. Theoretical Models, Hypotheses and Data Testing
3.1. Theoretical Models and Hypotheses
3.2. Data Testing
3.2.1. Data Collection and Processing
3.2.2. Reliability and Validity Tests
4. Empirical Analysis
4.1. Research Methods
4.2. Fit Test
4.3. Collaborative Development Path Analysis
5. Conclusions and Countermeasures
5.1. Conclusions
5.2. Suggestions
5.2.1. Improve the Relevant Government Management System and Encouragement Policy Guarantee
5.2.2. Promoting Innovation in Industrial Cluster Management
5.2.3. Strengthen the Atmosphere of Cross-Border E-Commerce Trade
5.3. Limitations and Implications for Future Research
5.3.1. Limitations
5.3.2. Implications for Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hafner, K. Industrial Agglomeration and Economic Development. Cent. Eur. Gov. Econ. Dev. Res. Discuss. Pap. 2004, 31, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
- Suminori, T.; Yuko, T.; Maria, I. An Empirical Analysis of Japanese Industrial Agglomeration and Factors of Supply Chain Internationalization in East Asia: A case of Japanese food, electronics, and automobile firms (Japanese). Policy Discuss. Pap. 2015, 33, 9–12. [Google Scholar]
- Ruhashyankiko, J.-F. Essays on international changes in industrial structure of production and trade. Harv. Univ. 1999, 23, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
- Trreola, L.-G.; Grajeda, M.-R. The bell-shaped curve of international trade openness: A panel data test for OECD countries. Econoquantum 2006, 3, 7–34. [Google Scholar]
- Bacchiocchi, E.; Florio, M.; Giunta, A. Internationalization and the agglomeration effect in the global value chain: The case of Italian automotive suppliers. Int. J. Technol. Learn. Innov. Dev. 2012, 5, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ottaviano, G.; Thisse, J.-F. Agglomeration and economic geography. Handb. Reg. Urban Econ. 2004, 4, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
- Friesen, P.; Kosempel, S. A Calibrated trade Model of Agglomeration. Work. Pap. 2009, 1, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tanaka, K.; Managi, S. Industrial agglomeration effect for energy efficiency in Japanese production plants. Energy Policy 2021, 2, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thmad, M.; Jabeen, G.; Khan, Z. Do rural-urban migration and industrial agglomeration mitigate the environmental degradation across China’s regional development levels? Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 7, 88–93. [Google Scholar]
- Kato, H.; Okoshi, H. Economic Integration and Agglomeration of Multinational Production with transfer Pricing. MPRT Pap. 2021, 1, 73–89. [Google Scholar]
- Markusen, J.-R.; Venables, A.-J. The theory of endowment, industry and multi-national trade. World Sci. Book Chapters 2021, 1, 45–47. [Google Scholar]
- Mukhlis, M.; Robiani, B.; Atiyatna, D.-P. Potential Agglomeration of Small Food Industry in Palembang, South Sumatra Indonesia. Int. J. Econ. Financ. Issues 2021, 11, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Funderburg, R.-G.; Zhou, X.-X. Trading Industry Clusters Amid the Legacy of Industrial Land-use Planning in Southern California. Environ. Plan. A-Econ. Space 2014, 11, 2752–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fodr, A.; Jorgensen, R.-D.; Stowe, J.-D. Financial Clusters, Industry Groups, and Stock Return Correlations. J. Financ. Res. 2021, 1, 121–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klarin, A.; Sharmelly, R.; Suseno, Y. A Systems Perspective in Examining Industry Clusters: Case Studies of Clusters in Russia and India. Risk Financ. Manag. 2021, 8, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steinfield, C.; Scupola-Hugger, A. When Do SMEs Benefit from E-Commerce in an Industrial Cluster? Evidence from a Biotech Cluster. Hugger 2005, 4, 77–82. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, L. Development Strategy of E-commerce Industry Cluster in Wanjiang-City-Belt. J. Xiangnan Univ. 2015, 5, 98–104. [Google Scholar]
- Connell, J.; Voola, R. Knowledge integration and competitiveness: A longitudinal study of an industry cluster. J. Knowl. Manag. 2013, 17, 208–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gefen, D. E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega 2000, 28, 725–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, Y.-S.; Tee, Y.-C.; Kim, D.-W. Endogenous versus exogenous development: A comparative study of biotechnology industry cluster policies in South Korea and Singapore. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 2009, 27, 612–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- David, G.; Straub, D.-W. The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption. J. Assoc. Inf. Sysems 2000, 1, 8. [Google Scholar]
- Mahadevan, B. Business Models for Internet-Based E-Commerce. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2000, 42, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.-G.; Liu, T.-S. The Impact of International Electronic Commerce on Export Trade: Evidence from China. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2022, 7, 2579–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, D.-C.; Kim, J.-S.; Kim, K. The Dispute of Electronic Commerce in International Trade-Focused Domain Name and Trademark in China. Korea Int. Commer. Rev. 2004, 4, 219–238. [Google Scholar]
- Beck, N.; Swaminathan, A.; Wade, J.-B.; Wezel, F.-C. Industry Clusters and Organizational Prototypes: Evidence From the Franconian Brewing Industry. J. Manag. 2019, 7, 2978–3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bathelt, H.; Graef, A. Internal and external dynamics of the Munich film and TV industry cluster, and limitations to future growth. Environ. Plan. A 2008, 40, 1944–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mcknight, D.-H.; Choudhury, V.; Kacmar, C. Developing and Validating Aruet Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology. Inf. Syst. Res. 2002, 13, 344–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Koufaris, M. Measuring e-Commerce in Net-Enabled Organizations Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 2002, 13, 205–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chandra, R.; Banerjee, S.; Radhakrishnan, K.-K. Transactive Energy Market Framework for Decentralized Coordination of Demand Side Management within a Cluster of Buildings. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2021, 99, 3385–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyon, A.-P.; Baruffi, R.-A. Creating a Plugin electric vehicle industry cluster in michigan: Prospects and policy options. Mich. Telecommun. Technol. Law Rev. 2011, 18, 303–347. [Google Scholar]
- Dellyana, D.; Hardjakaprabon, B. Co-creation framework in cluster industry with limited resources. Int. J. Bus. Glob. 2021, 1, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
- Colovic, A. Cluster Connectivity and Inter-cluster Alliance Portfolio Configuration in Knowledge-intensive Industries. Management 2020, 4, 619–635. [Google Scholar]
- Suleiman, Z.; Shaikholla, S.; Dikhanbayeva, D.; Shehab, E.; Turkyilmaz, A. Industry 4.0: Clustering of concepts and characteristics. Cogent Eng. 2022, 1, 2034264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y. Space-time cluster research of R&D industry in Seoul, Korea. J. Econ. Geogr. Soc. Korea 2013, 3, 492–511. [Google Scholar]
- Almeida, F.-C.; Onusic, L.-M.; Gremaud, A.-P. Fan Industry Cluster in Catanduva. Rev. Adm. Mackenzie 2005, 1, 37–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steinfield, C.; Scupola, A. Explaining infrastructure and e-commerce uses and benefits in industrial clusters: Evidence from a biotech cluster. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’06), Kauai, HI, USA, 4–7 January 2006; Volume 1, pp. 45–62. [Google Scholar]
- Ren, Z.-C.; Zhang, H.-B. Networking Agglomeration Effect of E-Commerce Platform in Industry Clusters. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 31, 1140–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomez-Herrera, E.; Martens, B.; Aurlea, G. The drivers and impediments for cross-border e-commerce in the EU. Inf. Econ. Policy 2014, 28, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Asosheh, A.; Shahidi-Nejad, H.; Khodkari, H. A Model of a Localized Cross-Border E-Commerce. Ibusiness 2012, 4, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Binyuan, Z.; Center, A.-I. The Development of Cross-border E-commerce in China and the Government Regulatio—Taking Small Cross-border E-commerce as Example. Reform. Strategy 2017, 5, 65–72. [Google Scholar]
- Eduardo, D.; Fensterseifer, J.-E. Use of resource-based view in industrial cluster strategic analysis. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2003, 23, 995–1009. [Google Scholar]
- Amit, K. Treatment of low strength industrial cluster wastewater by anaerobic hybrid reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 3123–3129. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, S.-M.; Wang, J.-W.; Ye, M.-W.; Huang, Q.-Y.; Si, X. An Evaluation of Supply Chain Performance of China’s Prefabricated Building from the Perspective of Sustainability. Sustainability 2022, 3, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evers, H.; Purwaningrum, F.; Schetter, C. Knowledge Transfer within an Industrial Cluster in the Jakarta Metropolitan Area. Work. Pap. 2013, 1, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
- Bates, R.-P. Factors affecting foam production and stabilization of tropical fruit products. Food Technol. 1964, 18, 93–96. [Google Scholar]
- Abeysekara, M.; Prasada, D. Returns to Factors of Production and total Factor Productivity in Coconut Plantations in Sri Lanka. Trop. Agric. Res. 2021, 32, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabish, M.; SiddiCui, Z.-K.; Nishikawa, K. Exclusive expression of C. elegans osm-3 kinesin gene in chemosensory neurons open to the external environment. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 247, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Munizu, M.; Riyadi, S. The external environment dynamics analysis towards competitive advantage and company performance: The case of manufacture industry in Indonesia. Int. J. Product. Cuality Manag. 2021, 1, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaya, Y.; Nasir, M.; Dewi, P. The Impact of External Environment on Competitive Advantage through SME Differentiation Strategy in Central Java. Univers. J. Manag. 2021, 9, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, F.; Yang, L.; Liang, H. Research on the Mechanism and Path of Coordinated Development of Cross-border E-commerce and Industrial Clusters in my country. Int. Trade Issues 2019, 2, 68–82. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, W.; Yi, W.; Soo, H. The Effect of Cross-Border E-Commerce on China’s International Trade: An Empirical Study Based on Transaction Cost Analysis. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2028. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Z.-Y.; Du, G. Coordinated Development of Urban Land Use and Ecological Economics in China. J. Math. 2021, 4, 5599633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.-T.; Cui, J.-N. Modelling Enterprise’s Coordinated Development Strategy with a Soft Fuzzy Rough Set. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2021, 6, 3250306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, K.-W.; Wen, C.; Wang, X.-H. Research on the Coordinated Development of Tourism Economy Based on Embedded Dynamic Data. Microprocess. Microsyst. 2021, 4, 103933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, M.-M. Evaluation on the Coordinated Development of Agricultural Economy and Rural Ecological Environment in Anhui Province. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2021, 7, 8372–8381. [Google Scholar]
Items | Latent Variable | Latent Variable | Items |
---|---|---|---|
Educational service organization C1 | Industry service organization level B1 | Industry cluster status A1 | Number of companies in the cluster C26 |
Economic services organization C2 | |||
Industry council C3 | |||
Scientific research organization C4 | |||
Industrial division C5 | Institutional environment and enterprise relations B2 | ||
Business competition C6 | |||
Industrial cooperation C7 | GDP within a cluster C27 | ||
Production facilities C8 | |||
Incentive regulation C9 | |||
Environment system C10 | |||
Manpower availabilityC11 | Factors of production status B3 | ||
Investment scale C12 | |||
Raw material situation C13 | |||
Market demand C14 | Cross-border market and logistics B4 | Cross-border e-commerce situation A2 | Number of cross-border e-commerce entities C28 |
Cross-border marketing capabilities C15 | |||
Cross-border sales C16 | |||
International logistics level C17 | |||
International logistics price C18 | |||
Cross-border e-commerce related regulations C19 | Cross-border e-commerce trade institutional environment B5 | ||
Customs management system C20 | Human resources related to cross-border e-commerce C29 | ||
Port transportation regulations C21 | |||
Number of free trade areas C22 | |||
International payment speed C23 | International settlement B6 | ||
International payment platform C24 | |||
International payment procedure C25 |
Category | Serial Number | Hypothetical Content | References |
---|---|---|---|
Industry cluster subsystem hypothesis | H1 | The level of service in the industry has a positive impact on the status of industrial clusters | Trreola [4], Ottaviano [6] |
H2 | The status of production factors has a positive impact on the status of industrial clusters | ||
H3 | Institutional environment and enterprise relationship have a positive impact on the status of industrial clusters | ||
Cross-border e-commerce subsystem hypothesis | H4 | Cross-border market and logistics have a positive impact on cross-border e-commerce | Friesen [7], Tanaka [8], Kato [10] |
H5 | International settlement has a positive impact on cross-border e-commerce | ||
H6 | The cross-border e-commerce trade system environment has a positive impact on cross-border e-commerce | ||
Complex synthetic system hypothesis | H7 | The level of business service institutions and cross-border markets are positively correlated with logistics | Sun [14], Gefen [16], David [18], Koufaris [22], Chandra [23] |
H8 | There is a positive correlation between the level of business service institutions and international settlement | ||
H9 | There is a positive correlation between the level of business service institutions and the institutional environment of cross-border e-commerce trade | ||
H10 | Factors of production conditions and cross-border markets are positively correlated with logistics | ||
H11 | There is a positive correlation between the status of production factors and international settlements | ||
H12 | The status of production factors is related to the institutional environment of cross-border e-commerce trade | ||
H13 | Institutional environment is positively correlated with corporate relations and cross-border markets and logistics | ||
H14 | Institutional environment is positively correlated with corporate relations and international settlement | ||
H15 | Institutional environment is related to corporate relations and cross-border e-commerce trade institutional environment | ||
H16 | Cross-border e-commerce trade is positively correlated with industrial clusters |
Variable | Components | Number of Observed Variables | Cronbach’s α | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |||
C1 | 0.814 | 4 | 0.853 | ||
C2 | 0.592 | ||||
C3 | 0.803 | ||||
C4 | 0.847 | ||||
C5 | 0.739 | 6 | 0.842 | ||
C6 | 0.722 | ||||
C7 | 0.760 | ||||
C8 | 0.613 | ||||
C9 | 0.608 | ||||
C10 | 0.672 | ||||
C11 | 0.787 | 2 | 0.809 | ||
C12 | 0.741 |
Variable | Components | Number of Observed Variables | Cronbach’s α | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |||
C15 | 0.783 | 4 | 0.732 | ||
C16 | 0.702 | ||||
C17 | 0.755 | ||||
C18 | 0.691 | ||||
C19 | 0.602 | 4 | 0.728 | ||
C20 | 0.693 | ||||
C21 | 0.725 | ||||
C22 | 0.763 | ||||
C23 | 0.852 | 2 | 0.839 | ||
C24 | 0.831 |
Variable | Components | Number of Observed Variables | Cronbach’s α | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |||
C28 | 0.854 | 2 | 0.844 | |
C29 | 0.839 | |||
C26 | 0.891 | 2 | 0.850 | |
C27 | 0.739 |
Fit Metrics | Reference Standard | Test Result | Model Fit Judgment |
---|---|---|---|
<5 | 2.730 | Yes | |
GFI | >0.9 | 0.952 | Yes |
RMSEA | <0.1 | 0.093 | Yes |
CFI | >0.9 | 0.948 | Yes |
NFI | >0.9 | 0.953 | Yes |
IFI | >0.9 | 0.998 | Yes |
PGFI | >0.5 | 0.783 | Yes |
Hypothesis | Path | Normalized Path Coefficients | Path Coefficient | S. E. | C. R. | P | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | A1←B1 | 0.239 | 0.144 | 0.031 | 3.417 | *** | Support |
H3 | A1←B2 | 0.153 | 0.105 | 0.062 | 2.762 | *** | Support |
H2 | A1←B3 | 0.478 | 0.292 | 0.084 | 4.381 | *** | Support |
H4 | A2←B4 | 0.203 | 0.172 | 0.075 | 5.164 | *** | Support |
H6 | A2←B5 | 0.436 | 0.288 | 0.108 | 5.208 | *** | Support |
H5 | A2←B6 | 0.381 | 0.362 | 0.062 | 3.518 | *** | Support |
H16 | A2A1 | 0.472 | 0.293 | 0.042 | 4.299 | *** | Support |
H7 | B1B4 | 0.581 | 0.112 | 0.039 | 3.683 | *** | Support |
H9 | B1B5 | 0.569 | 0.098 | 0.047 | 4.872 | *** | Support |
H8 | B1B6 | 0.633 | 0.183 | 0.038 | 5.490 | *** | Support |
H13 | B2B4 | 0.704 | 0.199 | 0.037 | 3.682 | *** | Support |
H15 | B2B5 | 0.617 | 0.232 | 0.027 | 4.552 | *** | Support |
H14 | B2B6 | 0.663 | 0.386 | 0.037 | 5.803 | *** | Support |
H10 | B3B4 | 0.589 | 0.182 | 0.036 | 3.720 | *** | Support |
H12 | B3B5 | 0.604 | 0.315 | 0.041 | 5.639 | *** | Support |
H11 | B3B6 | 0.703 | 0.243 | 0.032 | 5.218 | *** | Support |
Hypothesis | Result | Hypothesis | Result |
---|---|---|---|
H1 | Pass | H2 | Pass |
H3 | Pass | H4 | Pass |
H5 | Pass | H6 | Pass |
H7 | Pass | H8 | Pass |
H9 | Pass | H10 | Pass |
H11 | Pass | H12 | Pass |
H13 | Pass | H14 | Pass |
H15 | Pass | H16 | Pass |
Path | Standardized Coefficient | Path Coefficient | S. E. | C. R. | P | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1←B1 | 0.807 | 0.884 | 0.052 | 10.483 | *** | Support |
C2←B1 | 0.733 | 0.816 | 0.081 | 12.719 | *** | Support |
C3←B1 | 0.815 | 1.000 | Support | |||
C4←B1 | 0.702 | 0.663 | 0.047 | 9.548 | *** | Support |
C5←B2 | 0.737 | 0.757 | 0.092 | 10.429 | *** | Support |
C6←B2 | 0.558 | 0.602 | 0.074 | 9.088 | *** | Support |
C7←B2 | 0.791 | 1.000 | Support | |||
C8←B2 | 0.683 | 0.625 | 0.085 | 9.720 | *** | Support |
C9←B2 | 0.732 | 0.783 | 0.099 | 11.593 | *** | Support |
C10←B2 | 0.681 | 0.651 | 0.095 | 12.740 | *** | Support |
C11←B3 | 0.884 | 1.000 | Support | |||
C12←B3 | 0.701 | 0.676 | 0.108 | 9.884 | *** | Support |
C15←B4 | 0.673 | 0.610 | 0.074 | 11.739 | *** | Support |
C16←B4 | 0.620 | 0.513 | 0.063 | 11.903 | *** | Support |
C17←B4 | 0.815 | 1.000 | Support | |||
C18←B4 | 0.771 | 0.891 | 0.074 | 12.885 | *** | Support |
C19←B5 | 0.694 | 0.731 | 0.103 | 9.714 | *** | Support |
C20←B5 | 0.615 | 0.698 | 0.085 | 8.903 | *** | Support |
C21←B5 | 0.714 | 1.000 | Support | |||
C22←B5 | 0.709 | 0.890 | 0.093 | 8.430 | *** | Support |
C23←B6 | 0.825 | 1.000 | Support | |||
C24←B6 | 0.739 | 0.940 | 0.087 | 10.719 | *** | Support |
C26←A1 | 0.893 | 1.000 | Support | |||
C27←A1 | 0.856 | 0.962 | 0.094 | 9.439 | *** | Support |
C28←A2 | 0.709 | 0.671 | 0.092 | 10.719 | *** | Support |
C29←A2 | 0.714 | 1.000 | Support |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, C.; Liu, T.; Wang, J.; Li, D.; Wen, D.; Ziomkovskaya, P.; Zhao, Y. Cross-Border E-Commerce Trade and Industrial Clusters: Evidence from China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063576
Wang C, Liu T, Wang J, Li D, Wen D, Ziomkovskaya P, Zhao Y. Cross-Border E-Commerce Trade and Industrial Clusters: Evidence from China. Sustainability. 2022; 14(6):3576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063576
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Chenggang, Tiansen Liu, Jinliang Wang, Dongrong Li, Duo Wen, Polina Ziomkovskaya, and Yang Zhao. 2022. "Cross-Border E-Commerce Trade and Industrial Clusters: Evidence from China" Sustainability 14, no. 6: 3576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063576
APA StyleWang, C., Liu, T., Wang, J., Li, D., Wen, D., Ziomkovskaya, P., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Cross-Border E-Commerce Trade and Industrial Clusters: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(6), 3576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063576