Core Elements Affecting Sharing Evidence from the European Union
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology for Activating Sharing Activities
3. Literature Review
4. Sharing Regulations in the EU
5. COVID-19 Impact on Sharing in Literature
6. Key Elements in Studies Focusing on Sharing
7. Materials and Methods
- The stage of creating a theoretical basis was used to clearly understand the phenomena and structure the various variables affecting the phenomenon and compile a list of critical ones;
- The data selection phase included analytical reliability, measurability, and phenomenon adequacy. The quality of the available data was verified by analysing their strengths and weaknesses and verifying the data sources and the availability of the required data;
- The normalization phase was performed seeking to compare variables by the percentage of monthly differences. The percentage of monthly differences shows the percentage change compared to the previous month;
- The validation analysis phase was used to evaluate the regression equation constructed according to the normalization scheme.
(−1.55) | (1.71) | (−3.21) | (3.23) |
(2.04) | (−1.71) | (2.63) | (1.98) |
8. Results and Discussion
9. Conclusions
- -
- The application of digital sharing platforms to share products;
- -
- The connection of information societies to ICT network infrastructure;
- -
- The internet literacy and shopping online skills of information societies.
- Revision of number of visits to other digital sharing platforms (including more services);
- Revision of situation in other countries;
- Analysis of additional components;
- Review of different periods.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Groups | The Number of Visits to Digital Sharing Platforms | Abbreviation | Statistics | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Network infrastructure variables | Households—level of internet access | HIA | Corr. Coefficient | 0.4 |
Probability | 0 | |||
Households—the type of connection to the internet | HCI | Corr. Coefficient | 0.48 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Mobile internet access (percentage of individuals) individuals used a mobile phone (or smart phone) to access the internet | IMP | Corr. Coefficient | 0.61 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Mobile-cellular subscriptions per 100 inhabitants | MCS | Corr. Coefficient | 0 | |
Probability | 1 | |||
Fixed broadband subscriptions (per 100 people) | FBS | Corr. Coefficient | 0.33 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Internet literacy | Individuals using the internet (% of population) | IUI | Corr. Coefficient | 0.26 |
Probability | 0 | |||
Individuals—internet use | IIU | Corr. Coefficient | 0.31 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Individuals—mobile internet access | MIA | Corr. Coefficient | 0.35 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Internet use—finding information about goods and services | IFI | Corr. Coefficient | 0.36 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Internet use—internet banking | IIB | Corr. Coefficient | 0.2 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Internet use—participating in social networks | ISN | Corr. Coefficient | 0.41 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Internet usage—seeking health information | IHI | Corr. Coefficient | 0.34 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Internet use—telephoning or video calls | ITC | Corr. Coefficient | 0.28 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Shopping on-line variables | Last online purchase in the past 12 months | IPO | Corr. Coefficient | 0.34 |
Probability | 0 | |||
Individuals using the internet for ordering goods or services | IOG | Corr. Coefficient | 0.33 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Individuals using the internet for selling goods or services, percentage of individuals | ISG | Corr. Coefficient | 0.17 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Variables describing population | Entrepreneurial intention | EI | Corr. Coefficient | −0.1 |
Probability | 0.2 | |||
The ratio of young people in the total population on 1 January by sex and age (from 15 to 29), percentage | YP | Corr. Coefficient | −0.29 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Cultural and social norms | CSN | Corr. Coefficient | 0.16 | |
Probability | 0.1 | |||
Population density | PD | Corr. Coefficient | 0.04 | |
Probability | 0.6 | |||
Macroeconomic variables | Consumer price index | CPI | Corr. Coefficient | 0.4 |
Probability | 0 | |||
Labour costs (wages and salaries total) | LC | Corr. Coefficient | 0.16 | |
Probability | 0.1 | |||
Total unemployment rate (percentage of the total population) | TUR | Corr. Coefficient | −0.31 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
GDP per capita, PPP (current international $) | GPC | Corr. Coefficient | 0.12 | |
Probability | 0.1 | |||
Productivity (real labour productivity per person, index, 2010 = 100) | LPP | Corr. Coefficient | 0.32 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
R&D expenditure (% of GDP) | RDE | Corr. Coefficient | 0.22 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Economic freedom variables | Business freedom | BF | Corr. Coefficient | 0.09 |
Probability | 0.3 | |||
Investment freedom | IF | Corr. Coefficient | 0.15 | |
Probability | 0.1 | |||
Property rights | PR | Corr. Coefficient | 0.24 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Regulatory quality | RQ | Corr. Coefficient | 0.13 | |
Probability | 0.1 | |||
Rule of law | ROL | Corr. Coefficient | 0.16 | |
Probability | 0 | |||
Government effectiveness | GE | Corr. Coefficient | 0.15 | |
Probability | 0.1 | |||
Tax burden | TB | Corr. Coefficient | −0.13 | |
Probability | 0.1 |
References
- Acquier, A.; Daudigeos, T.; Pinkse, J. Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organising framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2017, 125, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbar, P.; Mai, R.; Hoffmann, S. When do materialistic consumers join commercial sharing systems? J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 4215–4224. [Google Scholar]
- Böcker, L.; Meelen, T. Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2017, 23, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Curtis, S.K.; Lehner, M. Defining the sharing economy for sustainability. Sustainability 2019, 11, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Choi, T.M.; He, Y. Peer-to-peer collaborative consumption for fashion products in the sharing economy: Platform operations. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2019, 126, 49–65. [Google Scholar]
- Farmaki, A.; Miguel, C.; Drotarova, M.H.; Aleksić, A.; Časni, A.Č.; Efthymiadou, F. Impacts of Covid-19 on peer-to-peer accommodation platforms: Host perceptions and responses. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 91, 102663. [Google Scholar]
- Piscicelli, L.; Ludden, G.D.; Cooper, T. What makes a sustainable business model successful? An empirical comparison of two peer-to-peer goods-sharing platforms. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 4580–4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selloni, D. New forms of economies: Sharing economy, collaborative consumption, peer-to-peer economy. In CoDesign for Public-Interest Services; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2017; pp. 15–26. [Google Scholar]
- Botsman, R. The sharing economy lacks a shared definition. Fast Co. 2013, 21, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Becchis, F.; Postiglione, M.; Valerio, S. Regulating the Platform Economy: Problems, Challenges, Tools. Netw. Ind. Q. 2019, 21, 12–16. Available online: https://www.network-industries.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Regulating-the-Platform-Economy-Problems-Challenges.pdf (accessed on 5 January 2022).
- Cheng, M.; Chen, G.; Wiedmann, T.; Hadjikakou, M.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y. The sharing economy and sustainability–assessing Airbnb’s direct, indirect and induced carbon footprint in Sydney. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 1083–1099. [Google Scholar]
- Ertz, M. Collaborative consumption, a buzzword that has gone conceptual: Three shades of the sharing economy. Economics 2020, 14, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Graessley, S.; Horak, J.; Kovacova, M.; Valaskova, K.; Poliak, M. Consumer attitudes and behaviors in the technology-driven sharing economy: Motivations for participating in collaborative consumption. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2019, 7, 25–30. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, L.; Li, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhou, L. How social distance affects the intention and behavior of collaborative consumption: A study based on online car-hailing service. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 61, 102534. [Google Scholar]
- Chandna, V. Social entrepreneurship and digital platforms: Crowdfunding in the sharing-economy era. Bus. Horizons. 2021, 65, 21–31. [Google Scholar]
- Evans, P.C.; Gawer, A. The Rise of the Platform Enterprise: A Global Survey. 2016. Available online: https://www.thecge.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/PDF-WEB-Platform-Survey_01_12.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2022).
- Wagner, N.; Strulak-Wojcikiewicz, R. Concerns about the technology used by collaborative platforms-a challenge for managers. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2020, 176, 2536–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, S.J. Role of Social Capital and Consumer Citizenship on Sharing Economy Participation on O2O Retail Platforms. J. Distrib. Sci. 2021, 19, 55–64. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; A European Agenda for the Collaborative Economy: Brussels, Belgium, 2016; COM (2016) 356 Final. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2016%3A356%3AFIN (accessed on 7 January 2022).
- Brečko, B.; Ferrari, A.; Vuorikari, R.; Punie, Y. The digital competence framework for consumers. Jt. Res. Centre Sci. Policy Rep. 2016, 1, 1–32. [Google Scholar]
- Battle, A.; Ryding, D.; Henninger, C.E. Access-based consumption: A new business model for luxury and secondhand fashion business? In Vintage Luxury Fashion; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Germany, 2018; pp. 29–44. [Google Scholar]
- Catulli, M.; Lindley, J.K.; Reed, N.B.; Green, A.; Hyseni, H.; Kiri, S. What is Mine is NOT Yours: Further insight on what access-based consumption says about consumers. In Consumer Culture Theory; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Edbring, E.G.; Lehner, M.; Mont, O. Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: Motivations and barriers. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 123, 5–15. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the Document. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of The Regions—A European Agenda for the Collaborative Economy. European Agenda for the Collaborative Economy—Supporting Analysis (COM (2016) 356 Final). Available online: https://www.ec.europa.eu/transparency/documents-register/detail?ref=COM(2015)550&lang=en (accessed on 20 January 2022).
- Dervojeda, K.; Verzijl, D.; Nagtegaal, F.; Lengton, M.; Rouwmaat, E.; Monfardini, E.; Frideres, L.; The Sharing Economy. Accessibility Based Business Models for Peer-to-Peer Markets. 2013. Available online: http://eukn.eu/fileadmin/Lib/files/EUKN/2014/12-she-accessibility-based-business-models-for-peer-to-peer-markets_en.pdf (accessed on 8 January 2022).
- Henry, M.; Schraven, D.; Bocken, N.; Frenken, K.; Hekkert, M.; Kirchherr, J. The battle of the buzzwords: A comparative review of the circular economy and the sharing economy concepts. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2021, 38, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Muñoz, P.; Cohen, B. Mapping out the sharing economy: A configurational approach to sharing business modeling. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2017, 125, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schwanholz, J.; Leipold, S. Sharing for a circular economy? An analysis of digital sharing platforms’ principles and business models. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 269, 122327. [Google Scholar]
- Curtis, S.K.; Mont, O. Sharing economy business models for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 266, 121519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daunorienė, A.; Drakšaitė, A.; Snieška, V.; Valodkienė, G. Evaluating sustainability of sharing economy business models. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 213, 836–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jabłoński, A.; Jabłoński, M. New economy business models in the concepts of big data, the sharing economy and the circular economy. In Social Business Models in the Digital Economy; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Germany, 2020; pp. 51–88. [Google Scholar]
- Minami, A.L.; Ramos, C.; Bortoluzzo, A.B. Sharing economy versus collaborative consumption: What drives consumers in the new forms of exchange? J. Bus. Res. 2021, 128, 124–137. [Google Scholar]
- Strulak-Wójcikiewicz, R.; Wagner, N. Exploring opportunities of using the sharing economy in sustainable urban freight transport. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 68, 102778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bardhi, F.; Eckhardt, G.M. Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. J. Consum. Res. 2012, 39, 881–898. [Google Scholar]
- Geissinger, A.; Laurell, C.; Öberg, C.; Sandström, C. How sustainable is the sharing economy? On the sustainability connotations of sharing economy platforms. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 206, 419–429. [Google Scholar]
- Broeder, P.; Crijns, K. Self-disclosure and trust on Airbnb: A cross-cultural perspective. In Storytelling Across Platforms: MANAGING Corporate and Marketing Communications from a Storytelling Perspective; Ariel University: Ariel, Israel, 2019; pp. 160–171. [Google Scholar]
- Lutz, C.; Newlands, G. Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 88, 187–196. [Google Scholar]
- Schor, J. Debating the sharing economy. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2016, 4, 7–22. [Google Scholar]
- Taeihagh, A. Crowdsourcing, sharing economies and development. J. Dev. Soc. 2017, 33, 191–222. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. 550 Final. Upgrading the Single Market: More Opportunities for People and Business. 2015. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/documents-register/detail?ref=COM(2015)550&lang=en (accessed on 6 January 2022).
- European Parliament Resolution of 29 October 2015 on New Challenges and Concepts for the Promotion of Tourism in Europe (2014/2241(INI). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52015IP0391&from=EN (accessed on 9 January 2022).
- Probst, L.; Frideres, L.; Pedersen, B.; Lidé, S. Collaborative Economy. Collaborative Production and the Maker Economy. In Directorate-General Growth; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Probst, L.; Frideres, L.; Pedersen, B.; Lidé, S. Collaborative Economy. Crowdsourcing. In Directorate-General Growth; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Probst, L.; Frideres, L.; Pedersen, B.; Lidé, B.; Kasselstrand, E. PwC Luxembourg and Sweden. Freemium model: Zero marginal cost. In Directorate-General Growth; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Vaughan, R.; Hawksworth, J. The sharing economy: How will it disrupt your business? In Megatrends: The Collisions; PriceWaterhouse & Cooper: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Mody, M.; Suess, C.; Lehto, X. Using segmentation to compete in the age of the sharing economy: Testing a core-periphery framework. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 78, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muduli, K.K.; Luthra, S.; Kumar Mangla, S.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Aich, S.; de Guimarães, J.C.F. Environmental management and the “soft side” of organisations: Discovering the most relevant behavioural factors in green supply chains. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 1647–1665. [Google Scholar]
- De las Heras, A.; Relinque-Medina, F.; Zamora-Polo, F.; Luque-Sendra, A. Analysis of the evolution of the Sharing Economy towards sustainability. Trends and transformations of the concept. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 291, 125227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olson, M.J.; Kemp, S.J. Sharing Economy: An In-Depth Look Its Evolution & Trajectory Across Industries. Piper Jaffray Investig. Res. 2015, 15, 12–24. [Google Scholar]
- De Leeuw, T.; Gössling, T. Theorising change revisited: An amended process model of institutional innovations and changes in institutional fields. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 435–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huarng, K.H. Entrepreneurship for long-term care in sharing economy. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2018, 14, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Zhi, Q. Impact of shared economy on urban sustainability: From the perspective of social, economic, and environmental sustainability. Energy Procedia 2016, 104, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.; Liu, K. A systematic review and future directions of the sharing economy: Business models, operational insights and environment-based utilities. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 290, 125209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinrichs, H. Sharing economy: A potential new pathway to sustainability. GAIA-Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 2013, 22, 228–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, C.J. The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecol. Econ. 2016, 121, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schor, J.B.; Wengronowitz, R. The new sharing economy: Enacting the eco-habitus. In Social Change and the Coming of Post-consumer Society: Theoretical Advances and Policy Implications; Cohen, M.J., Szejnwald Brown, H., Vergragt, P.J., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2017; Volume 246, pp. 25–42. [Google Scholar]
- Toni, M.; Renzi, M.F.; Mattia, G. Understanding the link between collaborative economy and sustainable behaviour: An empirical investigation. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 4467–4477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skjelvik, J.M.; Erlandsen, A.M.; Haavardsholm, O. Environmental Impacts and Potential of the Sharing Economy; Nordic Council of Ministers: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2017; pp. 1–78.
- Schor, J.B. Plenitude: The New Economics of True Wealth; Penguin Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Harvey, J.; Smith, A.; Golightly, D. Giving and sharing in the computer-mediated economy. J. Consum. Behav. 2017, 16, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaushal, L.A. The sharing economy and sustainability: A case study of India. Valahian J. Econ. Stud. 2018, 9, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hossain, M. Sharing economy: A comprehensive literature review. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 87, 102470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dabbous, A.; Tarhini, A. Does sharing economy promote sustainable economic development and energy efficiency? Evidence from OECD countries. J. Innov. Knowl. 2021, 6, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Räisänen, J.; Ojala, A.; Tuovinen, T. Building trust in the sharing economy: Current approaches and future considerations. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 279, 123724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.; Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy—A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hamari, J.; Sjöklint, M.; Ukkonen, A. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2015, 67, 2047–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Möhlmann, M. Collaborative consumption: Determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. J. Consum. Behav. 2015, 14, 193–207. [Google Scholar]
- Perren, R.; Grauerholz, L. Collaborative consumption. Int. Encycl. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 4, 139–144. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, M. Sharing economy: A review and agenda for future research. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2016, 57, 60–70. [Google Scholar]
- Belk, R. You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. J. Bus. Res. 2014, 67, 1595–1600. [Google Scholar]
- Gruen, A. Design and the creation of meaningful consumption practices in access-based consumption. J. Mark. Manag. 2017, 33, 226–243. [Google Scholar]
- Lawson, S.J.; Gleim, M.R.; Hartline, M.D. Decisions, decisions: Variations in decision-making for access-based consumption. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2021, 29, 358–374. [Google Scholar]
- Gansky, L. The Mesh: Why the Future of Business is Sharing; Penguin: Westminster, MD, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Ferranti, L.; D’Oro, S.; Bonati, L.; Demirors, E.; Cuomo, F.; Melodia, T. Hiro-net: Self-organized robotic mesh networking for internet sharing in disaster scenarios. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 20th International Symposium on “A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks” (WoWMoM), Washington, DC, USA, 10–12 June 2019; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Sanchez-Espiga, J.; Fernandez-del-Rincon, A.; Iglesias, M.; Viadero, F. Influence of errors in planetary transmissions loads sharing under different mesh phasing. Mech. Mach. Theory 2020, 153, 104012. [Google Scholar]
- Light, A.; Miskelly, C. Platforms, scales and networks: Meshing a local sustainable sharing economy. Comput. Supported Coop. Work (CSCW) 2019, 28, 591–626. [Google Scholar]
- Lamberton, C.P.; Rose, R.L. When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. J. Mark. 2012, 76, 109–125. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, H. The effect of anti-consumption lifestyle on consumer’s attitude and purchase intention toward commercial sharing systems. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logistics. 2019, 31, 1422–1441. [Google Scholar]
- Oyedele, A.; Simpson, P. Emerging adulthood, sharing utilities and intention to use sharing services. Serv. Mark. 2017, 32, 161–174. [Google Scholar]
- Bielefeldt, J.; Poelzl, J.; Herbst, U. What’s mine Isn’t yours–barriers to participation in the sharing economy. Die Unternehm. 2016, 70, 4–25. [Google Scholar]
- Lan, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhu, D.; Mangalagiu, D.; Thornton, T.F. Enabling value co-creation in the sharing economy: The case of mobile. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1504. [Google Scholar]
- Fitzsimmons, J.A. Consumer Participation and Productivity in Service Operations. Interfaces 1985, 15, 60–67. [Google Scholar]
- Boateng, H.; Kosiba, .P.B.; Okoe, A.F. Determinants of consumers’ participation in the sharing economy: A social exchange perspective within an emerging economy context. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 31, 718–733. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.; Yoon, Y.; Zo, H. Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: A Social Exchange Perspective. In Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2015, Singapore, 5–9 July 2015; p. 76. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301365281.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2022).
- Dubois, E.; Schor, J.; Carfagna, L. New Cultures of Connection in a Boston Time Bank. In Practising Plenitude; Schor, J., Thompson, C., Eds.; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2014; pp. 95–124. [Google Scholar]
- Schor, J. Getting Sharing Right. Contexts 2015, 14, 14–15. [Google Scholar]
- Schor, J.; Fitzmaurice, C. Collaborating and Connecting: The Emergence of the Sharing Economy Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption Cheltenham; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham Glos, UK, 2015; pp. 410–425. [Google Scholar]
- WEF. Young Global Leaders Sharing Economy Dialogue Position Paper World Economic Forum (WEF). 2013. Available online: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_YGL_CircularEconomyInnovation_PositionPaper_2013.pdf (accessed on 1 August 2021).
- WEF. Towards the Circular Economy: Accelerating the Scale-up Across Global Supply Chains: World Economic Forum (WEF). 2014. Available online: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_ENV_TowardsCircularEconomy_Report_2014.pdf (accessed on 1 August 2021).
- Gössling, S.; Michael Hall, C. Sharing versus collaborative economy: How to align ICT developments and the SDGs in tourism? J. Sustain. Tour. 2019, 27, 74–96. [Google Scholar]
- Sutherland, W.; Jarrahi, M.H. The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 43, 328–341. [Google Scholar]
- Garud, R.; Kumaraswamy, A.; Roberts, A.; Xu, L. Liminal movement by digital platform-based sharing economy ventures: The case of Uber Technologies. Strateg. Manag. J. 2020, 43, 447–475. [Google Scholar]
- Scholz, T. Platform cooperativism vs. the sharing economy. Big Data Civ. Engagem. 2014, 47, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
- Yaraghi, N.; Ravi, S. The Current and Future State of the Sharing Economy; Brookings India: Chanakyapuri, India, 2017; pp. 1–38. [Google Scholar]
- Mazzella, F.; Sundararajan, A.; d’Espous, V.B.; Möhlmann, M. How digital trust powers the sharing economy. IESE Bus. Rev. 2016, 26, 24–31. [Google Scholar]
- Markendahl, J.; Hossain, M.I.; Mccormick, K.; Lund, T.; Moller, J.; Näslund, P. Analysis of sharing economy services: Initial findings from sharing cities Sweden. Nord. Balt. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. 2018, 1, 239–260. [Google Scholar]
- Gerwe, O.; Silva, R. Clarifying the sharing economy: Conceptualization, typology, antecedents, and effects. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2020, 34, 65–96. [Google Scholar]
- Schor, J.B. Does the sharing economy increase inequality within the eighty percent?: Findings from a qualitative study of platform providers. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2017, 10, 263–279. [Google Scholar]
- Hunt, R.C. Forager food sharing economy: Transfers and exchanges. Senri Ethnol. Stud. 2000, 53, 7–26. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, S.; Song, Y.; Chen, S.; Xia, X. Why are customers loyal in sharing-economy services? A relational benefits perspective. J. Serv. Mark. 2017, 31, 48–62. [Google Scholar]
- Borsenberger, C. The Sharing Economy and the “Uberization” Phenomenon: What Impacts on the Economy in General and for the Delivery Operators in Particular? In The Changing Postal and Delivery Sector; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2017; pp. 191–203. [Google Scholar]
- Molenaar, C. Why customers would rather have a smartphone than a car: Relationship retailing as an opportunity. Gower 2015, 21, 11–27. [Google Scholar]
- Demailly, D.; Novel, A.S. The sharing economy: Make it sustainable. Studies 2014, 3, 14–30. Available online: https://www.iddri.org/en/publications-and-events/study/sharing-economy-make-it-sustainable (accessed on 14 December 2021).
- Dabbous, A.; Tarhini, A. Assessing the impact of knowledge and perceived economic benefits on sustainable consumption through the sharing economy: A sociotechnical approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2019, 149, 119775. [Google Scholar]
- Huckle, S.; Bhattacharya, R.; White, M.; Beloff, N. Internet of Things, block chain and shared Economy applications. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016, 98, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baller, S.; Dutta, S.; Lanvin, B. The Global Information Technology Report 2016. In Innovating in the Digital Economy; World Economic Forum: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- CIO Review. How Technological Advancements are Beneficial for Sharing Economy. 2016. Available online: http://www.cioreview.com/news/how-technological-advancements-are-beneficial-for-sharing-economy-nid-18307-cid-15.html (accessed on 3 January 2022).
- European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Online Platforms and the Digital Single Market. Opportunities and Challenges for Europe. (SWD (2016) 172 final)). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52016DC0288 (accessed on 20 January 2022).
- Hossain, M. The effect of the Covid-19 on sharing economy activities. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 280, 124782. [Google Scholar]
- Evelyn, K. It’s racial justice issue’: Black Americans are dying in greater numbers from COVID-19. Guardian. 2020. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/08/its-a-racial-justice-issue-black-americans-are-dying-in-greater-numbers-from-covid-19 (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Willison, T. Sharing during Pandemic-How TTL is Dealing with C19 [WWW Document]. 2020. Available online: https://www.torontotoollibrary.com/blogs/post/sharing-during-pandemic (accessed on 12 December 2021).
- Tardivo, A.; Sánchez Martín, C.; Carrillo Zanuy, A. Covid-19 impact in Transport, an essay from the Railways’ system research perspective. Advance 2020, 1, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Shortall, R.; Mouter, N.; Van Wee, B. COVID-19 passenger transport measures and their impacts. Transp. Rev. 2021, 41, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.; Hayashi, Y.; Frank, L.D. COVID-19 and transport: Findings from a world-wide expert survey. Transp. Policy 2021, 103, 68–85. [Google Scholar]
- Batool, M.; Ghulam, H.; Hayat, M.A.; Naeem, M.Z.; Ejaz, A.; Imran, Z.A.; Gorun, T.H. How COVID-19 has shaken the sharing economy? An analysis using Google trends data. Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraživanja 2020, 34, 2374–2386. [Google Scholar]
- Koetsier, J. COVID-19 App Economy: Instacart, Walmart, Costco Way Up, Uber and Lyft Drop Like Rocks. 2020. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2020/03/24/covid-19-app-economy-instacart-walmart-costco-way-up-uber-and-lyft-drop-like-rocks/#234234f5551c (accessed on 5 January 2022).
- Castillo, V.E.; Bell, J.E.; Rose, W.J.; Rodrigues, A.M. Crowdsourcing last mile delivery: Strategic implications and future research directions. J. Bus. Logist. 2018, 39, 7–25. [Google Scholar]
- Frenken, K. Political economies and environmental futures for the sharing economy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2017, 375, 20160367. [Google Scholar]
- Owyang, J. The Three Market Drivers: Causes for the Collaborative Economy. 2013. Available online: http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2013/05/09/the-three-market-drivers-causes-for-the-collaborative-economy/ (accessed on 14 December 2021).
- Bai, C.; Yu, B. Research on the value co-creation of the crowdsourcing services under the sharing economy. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morschheuser, B.; Hamari, J.; Maedche, A. Cooperation or competition–When do people contribute more? A field experiment on gamification of crowdsourcing. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2019, 127, 7–24. [Google Scholar]
- Padilla-Rivera, A.; do Carmo, B.B.T.; Arcese, G.; Merveille, N. Social circular economy indicators: Selection through fuzzy Delphi method. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 26, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papanaoum, D.; Palantzas, G.; Chrysanidis, T.; Nalmpantis, D. The Impact of Megatrends on the Transition from Car-Ownership to Carsharing: A Delphi Method Approach. In Advances in Mobility-as-a-Service Systems. CSUM 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Nathanail, E.G., Adamos, G., Karakikes, I., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jittrapirom, P.; Marchau, V.; van der Heijden, R.; Meurs, H. Future implementation of mobility as a service (MaaS): Results of an international Delphi study. Travel Behav. Soc. 2020, 21, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, L.; Wei, Z.; Qiu, S.; Feng, Q. Development and App-Based Comparison of Bike-Sharing Systems in China. Available online: https://road.cnki.net/download/jtdh/JT0103-008.pdf (accessed on 8 December 2021).
- Gassmann, S.-E.; Nunkoo, R.; Tiberius, V.; Kraus, S. My home is your castle: Forecasting the future of accommodation sharing. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 33, 467–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shokouhyar, S.; Shokoohyar, S.; Sobhani, A.; Gorizi, A.J. Shared mobility in the post-COVID era: New challenges and opportunities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 67, 102714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnes, S.J.; Mattsson, J. Understanding current and future issues in collaborative consumption: A four-stage Delphi study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2016, 104, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- López, Á.G.; de Rivera, J.; Cassidy, P.R. The measurement of the economic, social and environmental impact of Peer to Peer online platforms: The case of collaborative consumption. EMPIRIA Rev. Metodol. Cienc. Soc. 2021, 49, 87–119. Available online: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/2971/297165169004/297165169004.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2021).
- Google trends. The Number of Visits to Sharing Platforms. 2021. Available online: https://trends.google.com/trends/?geo=US (accessed on 11 December 2021).
Year | Literature of Economics | Literature of ICT | Thematic of Sharing | Thematic of Sharing |
---|---|---|---|---|
Under the Literature of Economics | Under the Literature of ICT | |||
1994–1998 | 1,350,000 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
1999–2003 | 1,600,000 | 54,000 | 0 | 1210 |
2004–2008 | 1,990,000 | 114,000 | 0 | 3190 |
2009–2013 | 1,360,000 | 107,000 | 8 | 4660 |
2014–2018 | 3,560,000 | 210,000 | 69 | 8350 |
2019–2021 | 4,030,000 | 268,000 | 58 | 8380 |
Total | 6,910,000 | 753,009 | 135 | 25,796 |
% | 100% | 100% | 0.00195% | 3.43% |
Three Levels | Development | The Use of Methods | The Application of Results | Relationship with a Sustainability Approach |
---|---|---|---|---|
First level | ||||
Business view | Development of digital sharing platforms opening new opportunities for business | Literature review and identification of ongoing directions | Increased application of sharing activity through the convenience | Activating sharing activities stimulates the increase in savings of natural resources |
Second level | ||||
Consumers view | Interest to buy from modern digital sharing platforms | Comparative analysis of key elements and identification of ones which stimulate sharing | Connection of households to informational infrastructure | Preferences to apply environmentally friendly sharing activity |
Third level | ||||
Macroeconomic view | Identification of macro-economic elements supporting the development of sharing activities | Identification of relationships and their validation | Formulation of regression equation important for the activation of sharing | Selection of macroeconomic conditions which meet the needs of sustainable development |
Activities | Authors | |
---|---|---|
Alternative names of sharing | collaborative consumption | [5,8,9,12,13,14,25,32,38,42,43,44,45,66,67,68,69]. |
access-based consumption | [21,22,23,34,70,71,72]. | |
the mesh | [73,74,75,76]. | |
commercial sharing system | [2,77,78,79,80,81]. | |
consumer participation | [18,37,82,83,84]. | |
connected consumption | [85,86,87,88,89,90]. | |
digital platforms | [15,91,92,93,94,95]. | |
recirculation of goods | [38,64,96,97,98]. | |
exchange of service | [87,99,100,101]. |
Authors Researching Sharing | Description of Study |
---|---|
[2] | ICT has grown into a “collaborative consumption”: accessing, providing, or sharing access to goods and services on a peer-to-peer basis, coordinated through community-based online service. |
[5] | The increasing diversity of sharing business models and the implications for business growth, community impact, sustainability, and public policy. |
[7] | Sharing uses technology, information and marketing that fosters a new culture for resource efficiency, customers prefer access to ownership. |
[15] | Internet of Things and blockchain technology benefit from sharing applications and creating a myriad of sharing applications, such as peer-to-peer automatic payment mechanisms, foreign exchange digital platforms, and digital rights management. |
[17] | The concept of sharing is compared to wider collaborative consumption and its social, economic, environmental, and political implications concerning the goals of sustainable development are discussed. Digital platforms turn global corporations into intermediaries, control most profits, and profit from them. |
[24] | Describes multifunctional digital platforms that can be used for crowdfunding financial resources, creative ideas, to collaborate and pool a wealth of non-financial resources, focusing on the mission of social change. |
[26] | The sharing is reviewed through transactions in digital spaces. The role of digital platforms in sharing has been identified. The concept of platform mediation provides a set of essential opportunities for sharing technologies. |
[27] | Internet resale, gifting, exchange, short term rental and borrowing digital platforms are available as part of the real sharing that is renewed due to digital technology development. |
[30] | Access-based consumption is examined in the context of sharing activities, as the nature of the exchange, its use, and the platform itself. |
[34] | Found that circularity and sharing have significant links in terms of sustainability, business models, sustainability consumption and management. Interfaces are revealed mainly in the business spheres platform and service-based activities. |
[51] | With the development of platform technologies, collaborative consumption (P2P-CC) is gaining popularity in sharing activities. P2P-CC is shown to double a company’s profits compared to users without P2P-CC. The platform benefits from a revenue-sharing scheme rather than a flat-rate service taxation scheme. |
[56] | Sharing is occurring at the intersection of the three most important economic trends: mutual exchange, ownership, and circulation business models. An examination of the environmental impact of online sharing platforms and possible prospects, one of which is monopoly super platforms. |
[57] | The challenges faced by companies with sharing activities based on digital platforms are addressed, to validate their business models by examining the dynamics that have emerged since the introduction of the sharing business model. |
[63] | Commercial Sharing Systems (CSS) provide access to the benefits of a product without ownership. Describes the possibility of creating attractive CSS for the target materialistic user segment. |
[64] | Digital collaborative platforms enable individuals to offer services, promote new employment opportunities, flexible working arrangements and new sources of income. Collaborative consumption encourages consumers to share more wealth and use resources more efficiently. |
[66] | Three broad areas of the sharing activity are revealed: sharing business models and their impact, the nature of sharing and the development of sharing sustainability, and two areas examining the impact of sharing on travel and tourism services. |
[69] | Different types of sharing services are analysed, recurring patterns, similarities, and differences between different types of sharing services are identified. Digital commercial, or community, service provider platforms with user fees or free, open, or closed access are examined. |
[90] | Sharing activity, also known as “collaborative consumption”, is seen as a progressive, disruptive force that makes economies more efficient and distributes value to consumers. |
[91] | Investigated how technological solutions in digital sharing platforms influence the use of collaboration platforms. |
[92] | Consumer trust and consumer and platform trust are at the heart of the sharing-exploring how to uncover trust issues in digital sharing platforms. |
[96] | Described the link between collaborative consumption and the application of sustainable practices from a consumer perspective using digital sharing platforms. |
[103] | The growth of e-commerce has increased interactive distribution through various channels, such as Crowdsourced Logistics (CSL), which simulates a delivery service to 1000 customer locations in a dynamic market environment compared to traditional delivery. Goal CSLs will bring strategic benefits to businesses. |
[105] | Increased availability of technology for hosting an online market drives the growth of sharing activities. |
[117] | Proposes a conceptual framework for the application of sharing that will reduce costs and increase the efficiency of long-term care by increasing business opportunities. |
[118] | Describes digital platform facilitation (P2P) sharing of underutilized assets, identifying possible reasons for commercial success or failure. |
Group | Sub-Group | Method | References |
---|---|---|---|
Mathematical programming | Single-objective | Dynamic regression model | [1] |
Multi-objective | Regression analysis | [14,36,63,78] | |
Linear regression | [37] | ||
Standardised regression weight | [111] | ||
Systematic models | Hierarchical structure | Network model | [31,48,74,76,120] |
Statistical analysis | Data measurement | Common method bias | [80] |
Logistic models | Generalised linear model | Logit models | [3] |
Analytical models | Business game | Stylized analytical model | [5] |
Data analysis | Content analysis | Qualitative content analysis (QCA) | [4,28,57] |
Descriptive statistics | Qualitative comparative analysis | [27] | |
Multivariate technique | Descriptive statistical analysis | [32] | |
Set analysis | Partial least squares analysis | [67] | |
General morphology | Multi-objective | Morphological analysis | [29] |
Multigroup analysis methods | General structural equation modelling | Multiple-group analysis | [46] |
Analysis of variance | Parametric test | One-way ANOVA analysis | [121] |
Structural analysis | Statistical model | Confirmatory Factor Analysis | [18] |
Structural equation modelling (SEM) analysis | [100] |
Description | References | |
---|---|---|
Application of Delphi method | This method identifies key social sharing indicators using qualitative (Delphi) and quantitative (unclear logic) tools that objectively reflect the uncertainty associated with data collection and decision-making and the number of attributes (indicators) concerning the data uncertainty. | [122] |
Following a questionnaire survey of experts using the Delphi method. Paper attempts to investigate the impact of megatrends on demand for car-sharing and communication services. | [123] | |
The Delphi approach was not used to predict the future of MaaS or to build consensus on the future evolution of mobility services, but to explore issues on which experts differ in their views and motives. | [124] | |
Evaluation data were collected using the Delphi method and a survey of consumer satisfaction with bicycle-sharing services. | [125] | |
In a two-phase Delphi study involving 59 experts, this study identifies the most likely holistic scenario for the future. It discusses 33 forecasts for six thematic sections of the accommodation sharing industry: relevance, different forms of accommodation sharing, users, hosting, platforms, and finally industry regulation. | [126] | |
The study conducted a three-phase Delphi approach consisting of qualitative and quantitative mobility service approaches. | [127] | |
This study included a four-phase Delphi study involving 25 experts to identify key drivers, inhibitors, and potential future changes in overall consumption over the next 10 years. | [128] | |
The study used the Delphi technique and developed forty-seven exposure indicators in three measurement areas (economic, social, and environmental). | [129] |
Sharing Platform | Services | Website |
---|---|---|
eBay | Equipment, tool, toys | https://www.ebay.com (accessed on 30 January 2022) |
Vinted | Fashion wearables | https://www.vinted.lt/our-platform (accessed on 30 January 2022) |
Fiverr | Freelance services | https://www.fiverr.com (accessed on 30 January 2022) |
UpWork | On-demand labour | https://www.upwork.com (accessed on 30 January 2022) |
Kickstarter | Edtech and creative projects delivery services | https://www.kickstarter.com (accessed on 30 January 2022) |
Airbnb | Lodging, hospitality | https://www.airbnb.com (accessed on 30 January 2022) |
Gumtree | Real estate | https://www.gumtree.com (accessed on 30 January 2022) |
Uber | Mobility, ride service | https://www.uber.com (accessed on 30 January 2022) |
Lime | Electric micro-mobility | https://www.li.me/en-us/home (accessed on 30 January 2022) |
BlaBlaCar | Carpooling | https://www.blablacar.com (accessed on 30 January 2022) |
Indicators of Statistics | Values |
---|---|
| |
Durbin Watson statistics | 2.28 |
| |
Bias-corrected scaled LM | |
Statistics | 0.53 |
Probability | 0.59 |
Pesaran CD | |
Statistics | −1.58 |
Probability | 0.11 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lingaitienė, O.; Grybaitė, V.; Burinskienė, A. Core Elements Affecting Sharing Evidence from the European Union. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3845. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073845
Lingaitienė O, Grybaitė V, Burinskienė A. Core Elements Affecting Sharing Evidence from the European Union. Sustainability. 2022; 14(7):3845. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073845
Chicago/Turabian StyleLingaitienė, Olga, Virginija Grybaitė, and Aurelija Burinskienė. 2022. "Core Elements Affecting Sharing Evidence from the European Union" Sustainability 14, no. 7: 3845. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073845