Next Article in Journal
Effect of Decreasing the Interception of Solar Illuminance by Vegetation on Ground Temperature in Degraded Grasslands
Previous Article in Journal
Physical Activity, Exercise, and Sports in Individuals with Skeletal Dysplasia: What Is Known about Their Benefits?
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Public Perceptions of Reuse of Faecal Sludge Co-Compost in Bhubaneswar, India

Sustainability 2022, 14(8), 4489; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084489
by Shirish Singh 1,*, Mohammed Ali Ibrahim 1, Sumeet Pawar 2 and Damir Brdjanovic 1,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2022, 14(8), 4489; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084489
Submission received: 23 February 2022 / Revised: 6 April 2022 / Accepted: 6 April 2022 / Published: 9 April 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This work reported the findings of a survey on reuse of faecal sludge co-compost in a region of India. Many useful information can be obtained from this work identifying factors influencing negative perception of the use of this product, with the purpose of focus accurately the strategies to promote this product can be properly focused, and so the contribution to the agriculture circular economy. The document is very well written and it follows a logic structure. I recommend that this work is accepted to be published after some minor corrections and questions.

 

  • Do the farmers really know what CO compost was before responding the survey?
  • Can the authors point out in the discussion any positive case in the world, if exists, where co composted faecal sludge is been successfully and extensible used in agriculture in a country/region. And which policys where implemented to achive high approval rate among famrmers.
  • Describe what is KoboCollect                                              line 149
  • Correct reference Error! 162 Reference source not found..           Line 162

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. Conclusion missing limitation of the study
  2. It is unclear how the negative perception agaisnt use of faecal sludge in compost can be changed. Please give some recommendations based on other studies. Create a new subsection dedicating to this issue.
  3. By answering comment #2 above, the reference can be increased.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript is generally well written. I only have a few minor observations:

Lines 40- 41: This phrase is a central hypothesis of the manuscript. Then it would seem appropriate to support it with broader studies than [4], since it only refers to maize production. In a quick search I found these works that the authors could (or find better ones):

Moya, B., Parker, A., Sakrabani, R., & Mesa, B. (2019). Evaluating the efficacy of fertilisers derived from human excreta in agriculture and their perception in Antananarivo, Madagascar. Waste and Biomass Valorization10(4), 941-952.

Sangare, D., Sou/Dakoure, M., Hijikata, N., Lahmar, R., Yacouba, H., Coulibaly, L., & Funamizu, N. (2015). Toilet compost and human urine used in agriculture: fertilizer value assessment and effect on cultivated soil properties. Environmental Technology36(10), 1291-1298.

Kelova, M. E., Eich-Greatorex, S., & Krogstad, T. (2021). Human excreta as a resource in agriculture–Evaluating the fertilizer potential of different composting and fermentation-derived products. Resources, Conservation and Recycling175, 105748.

Figure 1: please add a general map of India and the location of Bhubaneswar within the country.

Line 162 " Error! Reference source not found.. "

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop