Next Article in Journal
Analyzing Stakeholder Perceptions of Water Ecosystem Services to Enhance Resilience in the Middle Drâa Valley, Southern Morocco
Previous Article in Journal
Investigating Learners’ Engagement and Chinese Writing Learning Outcomes with Different Designs of SVVR-Based Activities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 14
Issue 8
10.3390/su14084757
Review Report
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

International Migration Projections across Skill Levels in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways

Sustainability 2022, 14(8), 4757; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084757
by Soheil Shayegh 1,*, Johannes Emmerling 1 and Massimo Tavoni 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Seyfettin Erdogan
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Sustainability 2022, 14(8), 4757; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084757
Submission received: 14 March 2022 / Revised: 12 April 2022 / Accepted: 13 April 2022 / Published: 15 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

Our minor recommendations are the following:

  • to include the limits of the study
  • to develop the Discussions section that has for now only some synthetic conclusions
  • to develop the research perspectives of the paper in the Conclusion section

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

My criticisms of the manusscript "International Migration Projections across skill levels in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways", are as follows:

- The theoretical foundations of the study are rather weak. There should be detailed theoretical explanations in the introduction.
- The contribution of the study should be explained in detail.
- The literature section is rather weak. It should be developed.
- The reasons for preferring the econometric method should be explained in detail.
- The conclusion part should be rewritten in accordance with the findings obtained.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The topic of international migration is very important and current.

In the conclusion, the authors should add limitations and recommendations for future research.

Will this model be applicable to the analysis of the refugee situation observed, for example, as a result of the war in Ukraine?

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 4 Report

I would strongly recommend publishing this paper after some small changes

  1. the literature review section might be a little more detailed. Authors have taken under consideration wide range of factors determining migrations and their impact on different social groups, so it needed to be properly described in the theoretical section
  2. "Discussion" is connected with "Conclusions" and actually is only to conclude presented results. It definitely should be developed according to required paper structure

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

accept

Back to TopTop