Next Article in Journal
Development of an Algorithm to Indicate the Right Moment of Plant Watering Using the Analysis of Plant Biomasses Based on Dahlia × hybrida
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Favorable Participation of Students with Special Needs in Public Tertiary Education in Romania
Previous Article in Journal
Livelihood Sustainability of Herder Households in North Tibet, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lessons of the Pandemic for Family and School—The Challenges and Prospects of Network Education
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Progressing towards Global Citizenship and a Sustainable Nation: Pillars of Climate Change Education and Actions

by
Siti Nur Fatehah Radzi
1,
Kamisah Osman
2,* and
Mohd Nizam Mohd Said
1,3
1
Institute of Climate Change (IPI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
2
Center for Teaching and Learning Innovation, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
3
Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(9), 5163; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095163
Submission received: 28 February 2022 / Revised: 15 April 2022 / Accepted: 18 April 2022 / Published: 25 April 2022

Abstract

:
This systematic review article focuses on the elements of climate change that have been used to create climate change awareness and hence inculcate sustainable literacy among secondary school students as well as actions that have been undertaken to nourish students’ global competencies on climate change. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was adapted for the review of the current research, which utilised two main databases, namely, Scopus and Web of Science. The findings indicate that 35 articles were successfully selected, and were subsequently critically and systematically analysed. The review has successfully formulated three main themes that were commonly used to create climate change awareness among schoolchildren: effects of climate change, factors affecting climate change, and mitigation plans in handling climate change issues. The review has also revealed four major themes and actions that have been used as platforms towards instilling global competencies towards climate actions; indeed, the findings of this systematic review will provide meaningful information, especially to educators as well as decision-makers in developing more effective, efficient, and sustainable strategies that will shape future globally competent citizens in mitigating and adapting climate change issues and problems.

1. Introduction

In recent years, global environmental changes have become more obvious, and the underlying cause for these frequent occurrences is anthropogenic activities [1]. This causal relationship has been proven by various studies in the literature [2,3,4,5] besides reports on climate change from global organizations [6,7,8]. Human activities such as agriculture [8], the burning of fossil fuels [9], and open burning directly or indirectly give negative impacts on climate change in the world. These anthropogenic activities significantly contribute to multiple phenomena such as frequent occurrences of extreme weather and the rising sea level which is a result of the Earth’s rising average temperature [8].
The emergence of climate change as a serious issue worldwide, along with other critical issues, has led to the idea and implementation of the 2030 Agenda, which is comprised of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). One of the goals, SDG 4, focuses on how quality education amongst students, whether in primary; secondary; or high school, will impact on SDG 13, which is climate action. Education for youth that emphasises more on sustainable actions will aid in improving the environmental condition of this world.
Currently, Climate Change Education (CCE) is one of the initiatives taken to deliver the facts about the current climate status of the world and the proper mitigation actions that need to be done to the youth, as they will be the ones who will have to face and deal with the consequences of climate change [10].; thus, CCE has now become a critical factor in strengthening the climate change awareness of young people [11,12]. CCE is one of the sub-areas of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) where the focus is on the complexity and challenges involved in understanding and responding to the impact of climate change [13]; furthermore, the implementation of CCE in ESD should include a holistic and integrated view of all dimensions [14], covering the ecological, economic, and social aspects of the consequences of climate change [15,16]. Students that receive and accept multiple dimensions of sustainable education in the proper and right way will obtain a better understanding of what climate change and sustainable development are all about, and this will eventually help to create awareness amongst them of the need to practise a more environmental-oriented lifestyle. The knowledge and skills acquired by younger people will guide them to conserve the environment [17].
In recent decades, CCE has become an important part of educational policy developments in most countries; however, the ways CCE is adopted in the education system of each country is important as well, as this will determine the success rate of its implementation. For instance, the implementation of CCE and ESD is considered progressive in Sweden [18]. These ideals have been integrated formally into the curricula and educational practices of Sweden [19], and the Swedish education system focuses more on each student’s individual responsibility for global environmental issues [20]. On the other hand, more attention is paid to knowledge than environmentally responsible behaviours in the Turkish and Bulgarian curricula [21]; however, an analysis of the national curriculum in England and Wales showed that teachers are legally bound to cover the information contained within the syllabi, and other topics like citizenship or ESD will be taught only if time and space allow [22]. Based on the examples above, different implementations of CCE will produce students with different views of climate change itself.
Effective initiatives of Climate Change Education will employ well-established models, theories, and past literature in guiding the process of creating their curricula for students’ learning. Good curriculum content related to the topic of climate change will influence students’ global competence which covers three elements, namely knowledge, skills, and attitudes [23]. The first dimension of global competence, which is knowledge regarding the impacts and consequences of climate change, will expose and encourage students to be more climate-friendly [24]. High levels of knowledge about climate change will influence the skills of students in order to scrutinise and appraise information and meanings on this topic [23]. The inculcation of correct attitudes to use their knowledge and skills to produce competent behaviours then constitutes the third dimension of Global Competence [23]; they will feel personally affected by climate change in their daily lives and will engage more in environmental-friendly actions [25,26], and as they practice pro-environmental actions, they will be aware of their responsibilities in encouraging their family and friends to be involved in more positive actions concerning climate change [27]; however, several factors and gaps that will limit students’ global competence are found in the process of delivering climate change awareness and knowledge to them.
Climate change issues, such as global warming and others, are perceived as an intersectional area of science and society, where the result will be complex, often controversial [28], and viewed as a productive context for both teaching and learning [29]; thus, teachers and students are the main players in tackling these issues of climate change. More efforts are needed, especially from teachers, to increase students’ understanding of controversial issues and to eventually train capable and responsible youngsters to participate in decision-making [30]. This is also supported by the fact that humans need gradual and consistent education for sustainable development (ESD) from an early age. This education should involve their surrounding community so that they will grow to be aware of how their actions affect their environment. ESD covers the balance between the economic, social, and environmental dimensions [31,32] and is not limited to knowledge of one’s climate and environment [31].
Each human being tends to become a better person through individual development, which consists of several processes and aspects such as physical, behavioural, cognitive, and emotional growth [33]. From the social aspect, adolescents will be directly influenced by the people immediately around them in determining what actions they will take in the future, especially in relation to environmental aspects [34,35]; hence, students tend to become aware of the climate issue if the formal education that they receive at school regarding sustainable education is effective, besides the role played by their social context such as the attitudes and actions of their family and friends towards the environment.
A person’s attitude towards climate change and sustainable development is seen in their behaviours in relation to any stimuli, external and internal situations [36], and is influenced by knowledge and emotions. All these eventually impact the person’s decision-making about natural resources and how those resources are managed [37]. The knowledge and action towards a more environmentally sustainable lifestyle cannot simply be imparted to students through a short training programme. It must be acquired through proper ESD, which will improve the person’s capacity and commitment to building more sustainable societies [38,39,40,41]; however, there are several constraints that will prevent students from achieving good global competency, which include the lack of knowledge, skills, and correct attitudes toward a sustainable lifestyle [42]. These gaps can be caused by weaknesses in the curriculum of ESD itself, as well as negative factors in the students’ surroundings.
In addition, parents of students also play a major role in exerting a significant impact on their values, behaviours, and attitudes towards the natural environment. This will eventually influence the students’ positions and stances on environmental issues, such as whether or not they choose to engage in pro-environmental behaviours [43,44]. Children show positive behaviours towards the natural environment when their family is functioning positively [45]. For example, through recent studies, family and friends were observed to have a highly significant role in improving the global competency of students regarding climate change by facilitating communication between them and helping them in their search for information [46,47,48,49]. Such information allows parents to show a willingness to inform and discuss with their children the current serious environmental issues that affect us, such as the pollution of the seas and our excessive consumption of energy and water.
Another important group that assists in the process of generating global competency in dealing with climate change among students is the teachers; they are the ones who are directly involved in delivering the input about climate change to the students in school, and any mistakes made by them in the process of delivery will produce a major impact on the objective of Climate Change Education itself.
The pedagogy used by the teachers in teaching this knowledge should be varied and not just adhere to the traditional methods of teaching. Generally, multiple teaching strategies can be applied by teachers to make students interested in obtaining new information about all aspects of climate change; for example, the inquiry-driven approach will allow students to consider the human element of environmental change and at the same time, gain deeper insights into the environmental and social impacts of human activities [50]. The prediction of long-term outcomes of change will take the students’ thinking processes into envisioning and imagining outcomes across different scenarios [51]. Thus, a scenario such as the students’ observation of accurate sea levels under different levels of carbon emission under their teacher’s guidance will provide a better awareness of the risks of global warming causing the sea level to rise [52].
Nevertheless, the most important factor is the curriculum content of the Climate Change Education itself. The implementation of climate change-related curricula is different across the countries. Although most countries have a well-highlighted vision to achieve sustainability based on the Sustainability Development Goals, certain actions taken to realise that vision, especially in the scope of their curricula, are still not well-implemented. Firstly, the textbook topics about climate change are not overarching and sometimes reproduce biased knowledge [53]. In Sweden, certain dimensions of sustainability are underdeveloped in their biology textbooks [54]. Therefore, an integrated and holistic view of all dimensions of sustainability is needed in Climate Change Education [14]; furthermore, the lack of action-oriented content about sustainable development in the textbooks has been mentioned. This lacuna will become a potential challenge for the ability of educators to promote action competence in their students [55,56]. Most of the textbooks give exercises and tasks that do not encourage readers to find any information beyond the concepts and perspectives that are already provided; indeed, the arrangement and setting of certain values in Climate Change Education will indirectly impact the thinking style of students.
Based on the issues described, the purpose of the researcher is to summarise, identify and analyse the emphasis and gaps of research on climate change knowledge and its impact on the global competencies of secondary school students based on previous studies.
The research questions are:
  • What are the elements of climate change that have been used to create climate change awareness among secondary school students?
  • What are the actions of secondary school students that have influenced their global competence in climate change?

2. Method

This section explains the method used to analyse the suitable articles related to climate change and the global competence of secondary school students. There are four main sub-sections, namely Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA); the resources used in this study; the systematic review process utilised to select the articles including identification, screening, and eligibility; as well as the processes of data abstraction and analysis which led to the findings of the current research.

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)

In general, authors need guidance in sourcing standard publications which contain the relevant and necessary information for the purposes of their research. PRISMA can be used as a basis for reporting systematic reviews for all types of research [57]. PRISMA acts as a catalyst to help authors produce further evidence that can be considered when, in the future, they perform further reviews of their checklist for the inclusion of publications in their research [58].
Although PRISMA is often used in medical studies, this method can also be used in the field of environmental management and at the same time, it can help to identify inclusion and exclusion criteria for a particular study [59]. For example, attention was given to studies on physical and biological climate change issues in an effort to address the management of human actions in nature [59]; furthermore, PRISMA examines an extensive database of scientific literature at a given time. That allows the search for appropriate terms to be conducted in relation to the adaptation of education to climate change. Checklist items were included to prove if there was evidence of not reporting certain items, which could increase the risk of bias, or where it was clear that information was needed to assess the reliability of the survey [58].

3. Resources

This study was conducted using two main databases to increase the likelihood of obtaining relevant articles, namely Scopus and Web of Science. Scopus is a robust database and consists of more than 256 fields of study, including environmental studies [60]. Specifically, Scopus indexes a total of 1360 journals related to environmental sciences [60].

4. Systematic Review Process for Selecting the Articles

The review was conducted in June 2021. The systematic review process consisted of three stages, namely identification; screening; and eligibility.

5. Identification

The first stage in the systematic review process was the identification of keywords (Table 1), followed by a process of searching for related and similar keywords based on thesauri, dictionaries, encyclopaedias, and past research. The keywords have been validated by an expert on the topics of climate change, secondary school students, and global competence (Table 1). The “*” marks enable the keywords to be found in the related articles either the keyword is in the form of singular or plural. The articles found from the Scopus database totalled 206 articles while 200 articles were found from Web of Science (WOS) databases; hence, the accumulated number of articles generated from both resources was 406 articles in the first stage of the systematic review process.

6. Screening

Before the screening process began, a total of 26 papers were removed as these papers appeared in both databases. In the first stage of screening, the remaining 380 articles were screened based on several inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The first criterion was accessibility, where the researcher decided to focus on articles with open access. This meant that articles with all available types of open access were accepted, such as Gold open; Hybrid Gold; Bronze; and Green types of open access. The secondcriteriona considered was document type. Research articles were the type of document that the researcher was focused on. This was influenced by the need for primary sources which offered empirical data [60]. Thus, other papers that did not offer empirical data such as systematic reviews; reviews; meta-analyses; meta-syntheses; book series; books; chapters in books; and conference proceedings were excluded. The third criterion was language. Only publications in the English Language were chosen by the researcher. The fourth criterion was that the publication date of the articles needed to be within the period of the last five years. The information related to these criteria of inclusion and exclusion is presented in Table 2.

7. Eligibility

After 329 papers were screened out in the previous stage, the third stage in the systematic review process was eligibility. A total of 51 articles underwent this stage. At this stage, the titles, abstracts, and main contents of the remaining articles were thoroughly reviewed to ensure the appropriateness of the stated criteria in achieving the objectives of the current research study. Ultimately, a total of 16 articles were excluded because they were not based on empirical data and were considered articles that did not answer the research question on climate change and the global competencies of secondary school students; therefore, the remaining 35 articles were selected for this study (Figure 1).

8. Data Abstraction and Analysis

An integrative review was used in this study. This review analysed and synthesized various research designs together, including qualitative; quantitative; and mixed methods [61]. Next, based on the thematic analysis, the processes of developing the appropriate themes and sub-themes were performed. Firstly, the data was compiled. This was done by carefully analysing the 35 selected articles to extract statements or data that answered the research questions. Next, the authors converted the raw data into usable data with the determination of themes, concepts, or ideas for the relevant data through coding methods [62,63]. The authors discussed with each other if there were conflicts of theme that arose. Finally, to ensure their consistency, the developed themes and sub-themes were adjusted according to the aims of this study. Three expert reviews were performed to ensure the validity of the themes and sub-themes. This process was important in determining domain validity and helped ensure the clarity and appropriateness of each subtheme within its respective theme. Based on the experts’ feedback and comments, adjustments were made at the authors’ discretion.

9. Results

Based on the results from the analysis of the selected articles, there were seven main regions involved in research on climate change, namely Asia; Australia; Europe; the Middle East; North America; South America; and sub-Saharan Africa (Figure 2).
More specifically, it should be noted that there were six previous studies in Asia while Europe recorded 19 previous studies on climate change among secondary school students. Furthermore, Australia and Oceania also have two previous studies recorded. The next two studies were recorded in sub-Saharan Africa; meanwhile, another study was recorded in the Middle East. Four previous studies were found to be conducted in North America, as well as one study in South America.
In the present systematic review, an analysis of the experimental designs of these studies showed that 15 articles (42.86%) used quantitative designs while nine articles (25.71%) used qualitative designs (Table 3). The remaining eleven articles (31.43%) used mixed methods designs. Four out of the six previous studies in Asia, used quantitative designs while the other two studies used mixed methods designs. In Europe, quantitative designs were most widely used by previous researchers studying climate change among secondary school students. Three previous studies used qualitative designs, meanwhile, seven previous studies in Europe used mixed methods designs. Two studies in Australia used mixed methods designs. Two previous studies in Sub-Saharan Africa used quantitative and qualitative designs, while one in the Middle East used a qualitative design. A study in South America used a qualitative method, while two studies in North America used qualitative methods and one study in North America used a quantitative method (Table 3).
The results showed that most of the studies used quantitative designs and questionnaires (34.3%). Meanwhile, two previous studies used test instruments (5.7%) and questionnaires with quasi-experimental designs (2.9%). In addition, for qualitative designs, three previous studies used document analyses (8.6%) while only two studies used interviews. Other studies used instruments such as semi-structured interviews, observations, and document analyses (2.9%); interviews and document analyses (2.9%); self-reports (2.9%); and interviews and document analyses (2.9%). For the mixed methods designs, three previous studies used questionnaires and interviews, while each study used different instruments as depicted in Table 3. The sample sizes for the questionnaires were diverse, from 195 respondents up to 2624 respondents. Next, amongst the studies using interviews, the smallest recorded sample size was only ten respondents, while the biggest recorded sample size was 162 respondents for focus group interviews. The list of sample sizes for all designs and instruments involved is summarised in Table 3.
Based on the findings of this study regarding the year of publication of these articles, ten articles were published in 2019 and 2020, respectively. Eight articles were published in 2021, followed by four articles published in 2018 and three articles published in 2017 (Figure 3).
To answer the research questions, three themes that revolved around the elements of climate change used to foster awareness among secondary school students were elaborated. The themes which emerged from the analysis were effects on climate change, factors affecting climate change, and mitigation plans in handling the climate change issue (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6) (Table 4). each of these three themes had specific sub-themes (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6). In answer to the second research question, it was found that there were four main themes, namely plant trees; reduce energy consumption; reduce the rate of carbon emission; and recycle, reduce, and reuse (Table 5). Each of these main themes also had their respective sub-themes (Figure 7). Students’ lack of exposure to the causes and effects of their ongoing actions toward the environment gave them a lack of awareness concerning climate change. High school students were often unclear about the role of humans in the problem of global warming, and they had an extended lack of perceived personal responsibility [99]; furthermore, students did not understand which of their specific daily actions could potentially impact climate change. This ignorance of direct cause–effect links would reduce students’ motivation to make the necessary changes to face this problem, which usually are personally and socially costly [100].

10. What Are the Elements of Climate Change That Have Been Used to Create Climate Change Awareness among Secondary School Students?

10.1. Effects of Climate Change

The effects of climate change were divided into six sub-themes: global warming, the greenhouse effect, weather and climate, anthropogenic disasters, environmental health, as well as pollution (Figure 4) (Table 4). Global warming, the greenhouse effect, and similar keywords are the most frequently found sub-themes in the past papers, with a total of 18 papers. These two main effects of climate change have caused various impacts, such as extreme weather; deterioration of glaciers; acid rain; and the depletion of the ozone layer, which will affect the health of humans. Recently, it has been shown that students of all ages have various misconceptions about global warming [101]. For instance, they have the misperception that a hole in the ozone layer causes global warming, as it allows more of the sun’s rays to penetrate the atmosphere. While this causes increased ultraviolet radiation levels which are harmful to human health, it actually does not cause the Earth’s temperature to increase. The misconceptions related to many climate change issues are not limited to students, but also include teachers [102]. Moreover, what is more, serious is that there are still people who are not aware of global warming issues and the greenhouse effect as well as what causes them. In Canada, only 61% of the population believes that global warming is happening and is caused mostly by human activities [103].
Climate change is closely linked to the increasing amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere [104]. Emissions of greenhouse gases are mainly caused by deforestation; open burning; and the excessive use of water, energy, and transportation [105]. In a survey involving 14-year-old Malaysian students, a total of 221 questionnaires was distributed and it was concluded from the survey that the students agreed that greenhouse gases have been excessively released, but the problem is that they did not translate their agreement into behavioural change [106,107].

10.2. Factors Affecting Climate Change

The factors that contribute to climate change are divided into four main sub-themes: anthropogenic activities, which refer to all activities that originate from humans; natural disasters; technology development; as well as weather and climate (Figure 5) (Table 4).
The most common sub-theme, anthropogenic activity, was found and mentioned in 18 articles. There are several keywords found in these studies which were related to this sub-theme: overexploitation, livestock farming, use of genetic engineering, hiking through nature reserves, waste management, human activity, industrial development, deforestation, burning fossil fuels, bad road or building construction, accelerated river incision, inadequate drainage, territory and social vulnerability, burning of gasoline, as well as excessive energy use. There is strong evidence that human activities have induced most of the environmental changes, especially in the aspect of climate change [1]; however, the negative contributions of these human activities toward climate change and other elements of the environment are poorly understood. Overexploitation by humans is one of the main causes of climate change [108]. Human activities such as intensive livestock farming also exacerbate climate change issues [109]. The use of genetic engineering and hiking through nature reserves could also be considered minor influencing factors of climate change. The element of waste management is one of the indicators in assessing students’ knowledge and perceptions towards sustainable development and surprisingly, one study found that they obtained low scores for their knowledge, but average scores for their attitudes [65].
Furthermore, a survey done amongst 1383 secondary school students in Hong Kong about climate change found that students realised the negative impacts of industrial development and deforestation such as global warming, and they tend to disagree with the statement that the balance of nature is strong enough to cope with these impacts of modern industrial development. In addition, in the IPCC report, territory and social vulnerability are also listed in the dimensions related to issues of climate change. As for energy use, most students have a low level of interest in doing personal behaviours out of their comfort zone, such as using public transportation. Singaporean students tend to perform climate-friendly behaviours only if fit in their daily lives [110].

10.3. Mitigation Plans in Handling the Climate Change Issue

Next is the theme of mitigation plans in handling the climate change issue. This theme is divided into four sub-themes: use of renewable resources, environmental care, green environment, and natural hazard management (Figure 6) (Table 4). The main sub-theme highlighted in most past papers is the use of renewable resources as a mitigation plan in handling the climate change issue. This sub-theme is highlighted in 12 papers. The use of natural energies such as geothermal energy, solar energy, water energy, and wind energy as alternative sources of energy has been practised in several countries. For example, windmills are used to generate electricity in the Netherlands. In Germany, the German Educational Standards for the Intermediate School Certificate in Geography calls for students to be familiarised with socially and environmentally acceptable lifestyles such as the use of public transport and renewable energy sources [111]. This was formulated by the government because many Germans were found to underestimate the importance of using renewable energy resources, besides the existence of misconceptions amongst students and teachers in primary and secondary education about energy [112,113,114].
Furthermore, a transition from high-carbon to low-carbon energy systems is one of the mitigation goals aimed at by most countries [115], as currently, various reports reveal that energy-related GHG emissions account for more than 60% of the global inventory [116,117]. Thus, carbon reduction should be practised in the electricity sector as one of the climate change mitigation plans, especially as most electricity is generated from fossil fuels; however, the rapid increase in electricity generation from solar photovoltaic technology and wind energy is insufficient to support the transition to meet the goal of limiting global warming to below 2 °C [116]. Thus, energy literacy, which includes the three traditional aspects of cognition, affect, and behaviour is important in informing and educating people about the basis for the design and implementation of intelligent and forward-looking policies.

11. What Are the Actions That Influence the Global Competency of Secondary School Students towards Climate Change?

The second research question is raised to find out actions that can improve the global competence of secondary school students, especially in the aspect of climate change. Through the measurement of their global competencies, an indirect assessment can be made regarding their level of awareness and responsibility towards caring for the environment. In this question, there is one theme that is emphasized, which is the actions and attitudes of secondary school students towards addressing the issue of climate change in their daily lives. There are several sub-themes that can be listed here, namely: reduce the rate of carbon emission by making use of different transportation choices; reduce energy consumption; apply the concept of recycling, reducing, and reusing; manage waste; as well as plant plants to green the home (Figure 7) (Table 5).
The sub-theme of reducing carbon emissions through the use of alternative transportation choices in this second research question had some related keywords such as taking public transportation, using an electronic car, walking, motorcycle pick up, car sharing, refusing car rides, biking or cycling, and taking a bus. As for the sub-theme of reducing energy consumption, the keywords found were to save electricity; turn off lights at home when not in use, and use less air conditioning. In addition, the related keywords for the sub-theme of applying the concept of recycling, reducing, and reusing were waste separation; refuse environmentally unfriendly products; use organic products; use fewer paper towels; consume vegan-based products; and avoid plastic. The last sub-theme is tree-planting, which involves the process of greening the home.
The reduction of carbon emissions through the use of different transportation choices was the most frequently found sub-theme in the selected past papers which were reviewed by the authors. This sub-theme and its related keywords have been mentioned in seven papers. This aspect of the action is quite common in students’ lives as they tend to experience using different modes of transport either to go to school or to other places; moreover, most papers gave greater focus to this sub-theme because of the authors’ intention to appraise the students’ knowledge about climate change and how their preferences on transportation would affect it. Besides this, if the students had enough awareness and knowledge about climate change and its impact on them, the authors wished to examine how they would react and whether they would tend to change their lifestyle to more environmentally friendly approaches, especially in the aspect of transportation. Unfortunately, it was found that the students’ climate change knowledge and the educational approach they experienced were somehow ineffective for the adoption of critical behaviours that required greater lifestyle changes, such as using public transport [118].
In another study, the students’ climate change knowledge and its impact on their behaviour and actions were measured through mixed methods of online pre- and post-tests besides personal interviews [81]. The sample involved were students at secondary schools in Austria and Southern Germany. Alternative choices of transportation were chosen as one of the indicators in measuring the students’ levels of knowledge and their behaviours towards climate change. In summary, the students were exposed to climate change knowledge for one year and this resulted in greater awareness amongst them about the impact of their actions on climate change. For example, more than half of the students decided to change their mobility behaviour by refusing car rides and switching to public transport or bicycles; this was in contrast with the pre-test, where the students’ willingness to change their modes of transport was quite low [25].

12. Implication

Apparently, there has been a movement in schools towards bringing up the awareness of students concerning climate change; this could be related to the current changes we are experiencing in climate conditions, which have become worse from day to day mostly as a consequence of human activities. Thus, this study is done in order to measure the students’ and teachers’ levels of understanding concerning topics related to climate change in the current syllabus; moreover, aspects of the current syllabus that should be changed and improved have been discovered to ease the process of delivery and increase the probability of students’ acceptance of the inserted information and input regarding climate change. In addition, the direct responses obtained from teachers, parents, and especially students through this case study have made the situation clear, as to how the input regarding climate change should be effectively delivered in schools. All of these are important to create the best way of delivering Climate Change Education that matches the students’ preferences and interests. For example, teachers majoring in Geography and living in urban areas may deliver input concerning the impacts of climate change-related to the haze, as the students who live there have directly experienced it. In addition, the relevant parties especially the Ministy of Education can use this case study as an aiding tool or additional guidance in reconstructing school syllabi in their own contexts to be more student-friendly and effective.

13. Limitations and Recommendations

The systematic literature review that has been conducted was limited to two databases only, namely WOS and Scopus. Only publications that used the English language, articles published with open access and studies with empirical data were chosen for review. The study was conducted in June 2021 and articles published in the period from 2017 to 2021 were selected. Therefore, only 35 articles were selected to answer this study’s research questions. For future research, the number of databases and main keywords should be increased, while the sources of papers should not be limited to open access only. This would allow for the discovery of more relevant papers that can be used as resources and references.

14. Conclusions

The recent literature on climate change and sustainable development plus the effectiveness of Climate Change Education for students reflect a basic understanding of the students’ levels of knowledge and understanding about this issue and how they respond to the worsening impacts of climate change; fsurthermore, four main themes that correspond to the two main objectives of this study were identified based on the systematic review performed by the current research. The first three themes cover the first objective, which concerns the elements of climate change that have been used to create climate change awareness among secondary school students. These three main themes are the overall aspects of climate change and sustainable development, which are: the factors influencing climate change; its impacts on humans; and the mitigation actions that can be taken in handling climate change. Moreover, the second objective, which concerns the actions that influence the global competency of secondary school students towards climate change, has been met through the list of the sub-themes, namely: reducing the rate of carbon emission by making use of different transportation choices; reducing energy consumption; applying the concept of recycling, reducing, and reusing; managing waste; as well as greening the home by planting plants. Therefore, the further broadening of this basic understanding through the integration of diverse research findings in future studies may be able to assist the concerned parties in developing more efficient strategies that will enable and empower more young people, especially secondary school students, in effectively adapting their knowledge about climate change into their behaviours so that climate change impacts can be minimized.

Author Contributions

In this study, S.N.F.R. as the first author contributes the most as for the aspect of conceptualization, methodology, the using of Excel software, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing and original draft preparation, review and editing and visualization. Moreover, K.O. and M.N.M.S. as the second and third authors are responsible for project administration, funding acquisition, supervision and validation of this study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Higher Education with grant number of TRGS/1/2019/UKM/01/3/2.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable as this study does not involving humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable as this study does not involving humans.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data were obtained from 35 articles that have been selected and can be found at the reference section.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education for providing research grant TRGS/1/2019/UKM/01/3/2 for this study. The author also would like to acknowledge David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff and Douglas G. Altman for their study on the concept of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) which have highly contributed in methodology of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Neukom, R.; Steiger, N.; Gómez-Navarro, J.J.; Wang, J.; Werner, J.P. No Evidence for Globally Coherent Warm and Cold Periods over the Preindustrial Common Era. Nature 2019, 571, 550–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Abatzoglou, J.T.; Williams, A.P.; Barbero, R. Global Emergence of Anthropogenic Climate Change in Fire Weather Indices. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2019, 46, 326–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Ernesto, R.C. Chapter 2—A Review of the Current Science of Climate Change. In Tourism and the Implications of Climate Change: Issues and Actions; Schott, C., Ed.; Bridging Tourism Theory and Practice; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2010; pp. 27–48. [Google Scholar]
  4. Moser, S.C. Communicating Climate Change: History, Challenges, Process and Future Directions. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 2010, 1, 31–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vezér, M.A. Computer Models and the Evidence of Anthropogenic Climate Change: An Epistemology of Variety-of-Evidence Inferences and Robustness Analysis. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 2016, 56, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. EPA. Global Anthropogenic Non-CO2; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
  7. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D.J., Mach, K.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  8. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In Global Warming of 1.5 C; Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Roberts, H.O.P., Skea, D., Shukla, J., Pirani, P.R., Moufouma-Okia, A., Péan, W., Pidcock, C., Connors, R., et al., Eds.; An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change; World Meteorological Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  9. Trenberth, K.E. Climate Change Caused by Human Activities Is Happening and It Already Has Major Consequences. J. Energy Nat. Resour. Law 2018, 36, 463–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Merner, T. Climate Change Education for Sustainable Development: The UNESCO Climate Change Initiative; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ferkany, M.; Freed, A.L.; Stapleton, S.R. A review of “Navigating Environmental Attitudes”. J. Environ. Educ. 2014, 45, 134–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Levine, D.S.; Strube, M.J. Environmental attitudes, knowledge, intentions and behaviors among college students. J. Soc. Psychol. 2012, 152, 308–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. UNESCO. UNESCO Strategy for the Second Half of the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  14. Borg, C.; Gericke, N.; Höglund, H.-O.; Bergman, E. The Barriers Encountered by Teachers Implementing Education for Sustainable Development: Discipline Bound Differences and Teaching Traditions. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2012, 30, 185–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Giddings, B.; Hopwood, B.; Obrien, G. Environment, Economy and Society: Fitting Them Together into Sustainable Development. Sustain. Dev. 2002, 10, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jabareen, Y. A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2008, 10, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. UNCED (UN Conference on Environment and Development). Agenda 21—Action Plan for the Next Century; UNCED: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  18. Breiting, S.; Wickenberg, P. The Progressive Development of Environmental Education in Sweden and Denmark. Environ. Educ. Res. 2010, 16, 9–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Olsson, D.; Gericke, N.M.; Chang Rundgren, S.-N. The Effect of Implementation of Education for Sustainable Development in Swedish Compulsory Schools-Assessing Pupils’ Sustainability Consciousness. Environ. Educ. Res. 2016, 22, 176–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hillbur, P.; Ideland, M.; Malmberg, C. Response and Responsibility: Fabrication of the Eco-Certified Citizen in Swedish Curricula 1962–2011. J. Curric. Stud. 2016, 48, 409–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Erdoğan, M.; Kostova, Z.; Marcinkowski, T. Components of Environmental Literacy in Elementary Science Education Curriculum in Bulgaria and Turkey. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2009, 5, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chatzifotiou, A. An imperfect match? The structure of the National Curriculum and education for sustainable development. Curric. J. 2002, 13, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. OECD. Global Competency for an Inclusive World; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ernst, J.; Blood, N.; Beery, T. Environmental action and student environmental leaders: Exploring the influence of environmental attitudes, locus of control, and sense of personal responsibility. Environ. Educ. Res. 2017, 23, 149–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Boyes, E.; Stanisstreet, M. Environmental education for behaviour change: Which actions should be targeted? Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2012, 34, 1591–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Metag, J.; Füchslin, T.; Schäfer, M.S. Global warming’s five Germanys: A typology of Germans’ views on climate change and patterns of media use and information. Public Underst. Sci. 2017, 26, 434–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hiramatsu, A.; Kurisu, K.; Nakamura, H.; Teraki, S.; Hanaki, K. Spillover effect on families derived from environmental education for children. Low Carbon Econ. 2014, 5, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hancock, T.S.; Friedrichsen, P.J.; Kinslow, A.T.; Sadler, T.D. Selecting Socio-scientific Issues for Teaching. Sci. Educ. 2019, 28, 639–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zeidler, D.L. Socioscientific Issues as a Curriculum Emphasis: Theory, Research, and Practice. In Handbook of Research on Science Education; Lederman, N.G., Abell, S., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2014; Volume 2, pp. 697–726. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lorenzo-Rial, M.A.; Álvarez Lires, M.M.; Arias Correa, A.; Pérez Rodríguez, U. Learning how to interpret ocean acidification with on-line resources in a contextualised experimentation scenario. Ensen. Cienc. 2019, 37, 189–209. [Google Scholar]
  31. Stapp, W. Watershed education for sustainable development. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 2000, 9, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Werbach, A. Strategy for Sustainability: A Business Manifesto; Harvard Business Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jain, C.R.; Apple, D.K.; Ellis, W. What is self-growth? Int. J. Process Educ. 2015, 7, 41–52. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zen, I.S.; Subramaniam, D.; Sulaiman, H.; Saleh, A.L.; Omar, W.; Salim, M.R. Institutionalize waste minimization governance towards campus sustainability: A case study of Green Office initiatives in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 1407–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zen, I.S.; D’souza, C.; Ismail, S.; Arsat, M. University living learning labs: An integrative and transformative approach. J. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 2019, 14, 139–155. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cebrián, G.; Junyent, M. Competencies in education for sustainable development: Exploring the student teachersí views. Sustainability 2015, 7, 2768–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Meinhold, J.L.; Malkus, A.J. Adolescent environmental behaviors: Can knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy make a difference? Environ. Behav. 2005, 37, 511–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lavanya, B.; Saraswathi, S. Education for sustainable development. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Adapt. Manag. 2014, 1, 132–136. [Google Scholar]
  39. Salīte, I. Searching for sustainability in teacher education and educational research: Experiences from the Baltic and Black Sea Circle Consortium for educational research. Discourse Commun. Sustain. Educ. 2015, 6, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Pipere, A.; Veisson, M.; Salīte, I. Developing research in teacher education for sustainability: UN DESD via the Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability. J. Teach. Educ. Sustain. 2015, 17, 5–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Heasly, B.; Lindner, J.; Iliško, D.; Salīte, I. From initiatives, to insights, to implementation of the sustainability and securitability agenda for 2030. Discourse Commun. Sustain. Educ. 2020, 11, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Salīte, I.; Drelinga, E.; Iliško, D.; Oļehnoviča, E.; Zariņa, S. Sustainability from the transdisciplinary perspective: An action research strategy for continuing education program development. J. Teach. Educ. Sustain. 2016, 18, 135–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Grønhøj, A.; Thøgersen, J. Action Speaks Louder thanWords: The Efect of Personal Attitudes and Family Norms on Adolescents’ Pro-Environmental Behaviour. J. Econ. Psychol. 2012, 33, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Matthies, E.; Selge, S.; Klöckner, C.A. The Role of Parental Behaviour for the Development of Behaviour Specific Environmental Norms—The Example of Recycling and Re-Use Behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. 2012, 32, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Erhabor, N.I.; Oviahon, C. Relationship between Family Functioning and Environmental Attitudes on the Environmental Behaviours of Students in a Federal University in Edo State, Nigeria. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. Res. 2018, 2, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Mead, E.; Roser-Renouf, C.; Rimal, R.N.; Flora, J.A.; Maibach, E.W.; Leiserowitz, A. Information Seeking about Global Climate Change among Adolescents: The Role of Risk Perceptions, Ecacy Beliefs, and Parental Influences. Atl. J. Commun. 2012, 20, 31–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Öhman, J.; Öhman, M. Participatory Approach in Practice: An Analysis of Student Discussions about Climate Change. Environ. Educ. Res. 2013, 19, 324–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ojala, M. Climate Change Skepticism among Adolescents. J. Youth Stud. 2015, 18, 1135–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Stevenson, K.T.; Peterson, M.N.; Bondell, H.D. The Influence of Personal Beliefs, Friends, and Family in Building Climate Change Concern among Adolescents. Environ. Educ. Res. 2016, 25, 832–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Labosier, C.F. The Integrative Nature of Geography: Bridging the Gap in the Environmental Science Curriculum. Int. J. Appl. Geospat. Res. 2019, 10, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Sezen-Barrie, A.; Miller-Rushing, A.; Hufnagel, E. ‘It’s a gassy world’: Starting with students’ wondering questions to inform Climate Change Education. Environ. Educ. Res. 2020, 26, 555–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xiang, X.; Meadows, M.E. Preparing Adolescents for the Uncertain Future: Concepts, Tools and Strategies for Teaching Anthropogenic Environmental Change. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Molin, L. Space, Curriculum Space and Morality: About School Geography, Content and Teachers’ Choice. Ph.D. Dissertation, Uppsala University: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala, Sweden, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sandell, K.; Öhman, J. Educational Potentials of Encounters with Nature: Reflections from a Swedish Outdoor Perspective. Environ. Educ. Res. 2010, 16, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kowasch, M. Resource Exploitation and Consumption in the Frame of Education for Sustainable Development in German Geography Textbooks. Rev. Int. Geogr. Educ. Online 2017, 7, 48–79. [Google Scholar]
  56. Andersen, K.N. Evaluation of School Tasks in the Light of Sustainability Education: Textbook Research in Science Education in Luxembourgish Primary Schools. Environ. Educ. Res. 2018, 24, 1301–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and MetaAnalyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 151, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Healthcare Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. BMJ 2009, 339, b2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Sierra-Correa, P.C.; Cantera Kintz, J.R. Ecosystem-based adaptation for improving coastal planning for sea-level rise: A systematic review for mangrove coasts. Mar. Policy 2015, 51, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hayrol, A.M.S.; Asnarulkhadi, A.S.; Samsul, F.S.; Zuraina, A. Mirror-mirror on the wall, what climate change adaptation strategies are practiced by the Asian’s fishermen of all? J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 232, 104–117. [Google Scholar]
  61. Whittemore, R.; Knafl, K. The Integrative Review: Updated Methodology. J. Adv. Nurs. 2005, 52, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sandelowski, M.J. Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin. Res. Nurs. Health 1995, 18, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Patton, M.Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed.; Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  64. Mohamed Ali Khan, N.S.; Karpudewan, M.; Annamalai, N. Moving beyond the One-Size-Fits-All Model in Describing the Climate Conserving Behaviors of Malaysian Secondary Students. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  65. Prabawani, B.; Hadi, S.P.; Zen, I.S.; Afrizal, T.; Purbawati, D. Education for Sustainable Development as Diffusion of Innovation of Secondary School Students. J. Teach. Educ. Sustain. 2020, 22, 84–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kang, J.; Hong, J.H. Framing effect of environmental cost information on environmental awareness among high school students. Environ. Educ. Res. 2021, 27, 936–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jackson, L.; Pang, M.F. Secondary school students’ views of climate change in Hong Kong. Int. Res. Geogr. Environ. Educ. 2017, 26, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Paul, J.D.; Cieslik, K.; Sah, N.; Shakya, P.; Parajuli, B.P.; Paudel, S.; Dewulf, A.; Buytaert, W. Applying Citizen Science for Sustainable Development: Rainfall Monitoring in Western Nepal. Front. Water 2020, 2, 581375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yeh, S.C.; Huang, J.Y.; Yu, H.C. Analysis of Energy Literacy and Misconceptions of Junior High Students in Taiwan. Sustainability 2017, 9, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Koulougliotis, D.; Antonoglou, L.; Salta, K. Probing Greek secondary school students’ awareness of green chemistry principles infused in context-based projects related to socio-scientific issues. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2021, 43, 298–313. [Google Scholar]
  71. Biström, E.; Lundström, R. Textbooks and action competence for sustainable development: An analysis of Swedish lower secondary level textbooks in geography and biology. Environ. Educ. Res. 2020, 27, 279–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jiménez-Liso, M.R.; González-Herrera, R.; Banos-González, I. Socio-Ecological Controversies in the News as Trigger of a Model-Based Inquiry Instructional Sequence about the Effect of Global Warming on the Great Barrier Reef. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Montero-Pau, J.; Álvaro, N.; Gavidia, V.; Mayoral, O. Development of Environmental Health Competencies through Compulsory Education. A Polyhedral Approach Based on the SDGs. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Neset, T.S.; Andersson, L.; Uhrqvist, O.; Navarra, C. Serious Gaming for Climate Adaptation—Assessing the Potential and Challenges of a Digital Serious Game for Urban Climate Adaptation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Levrini, O.; Tasquier, G.; Branchetti, L.; Barelli, E. Developing future-scaffolding skills through science education. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2019, 41, 2647–2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Majer, J.; Slapničar, M.; Devetak, I. Assessment of the 14- and 15-Year-Old Students’ Understanding of the Atmospheric Phenomena. Acta Chim. Slov. 2019, 66, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Musitu-Ferrer, D.; León-Moreno, C.; Callejas-Jerónimo, J.E.; Esteban-Ibáñez, M.; Musitu-Ochoa, G. Relationships between Parental Socialization Styles, Empathy and Connectedness with Nature: Their Implications in Environmentalism. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Kurup, P.M.; Levinson, R.; Li, X. Informed-Decision Regarding Global Warming and Climate Change among High School Students in the United Kingdom. Can. J. Sci. Math. Technol. Educ. 2020, 21, 166–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Alice, D.; Semino, E.; Paul, S.-A.S. Metaphors of Climate Science in Three Genres: Research Articles, Educational Texts, and Secondary School Student Talk. Appl. Ling. 2017, 40, 379–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dornhoff, M.; Sothmann, J.N.; Fiebelkorn, F.; Menzel, S. Nature Relatedness and Environmental Concern of Young People in Ecuador and Germany. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Deisenrieder, V.; Kubisch, S.; Keller, L.; Stötter, J. Bridging the Action Gap by Democratizing Climate Change Education—The Case of k.i.d.Z.21 in the Context of Fridays for Future. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Böhm, M.; Barkmann, J.; Eggert, S.; Carstensen, C.H.; Bögeholz, S. Quantitative Modelling and Perspective Taking: Two Competencies of Decision Making for Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Parth, S.; Schickl, M.; Keller, L.; Stoetter, J. Quality Child–Parent Relationships and Their Impact on Intergenerational Learning and Multiplier Effects in Climate Change Education. Are We Bridging the Knowledge–Action Gap? Sustainability 2020, 12, 7030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ganatsa, M.; Tsakaldimi, M.; Ganatsas, P. Factors Affecting Attitudes and Behavior of Greek Secondary School Students on Current Environmental Issues. Rev. Int. Geogr. Educ. 2021, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Schrot, O.G.; Peduzzi, D.; Ludwig, D.; Riede, M.; Keller, L. Is it possible to build adolescents’ cognitive adaptive capacity through Climate Change Education? Insights into a two-year long educational programme in North Tyrol (Austria) and South Tyrol (Italy). Clim. Risk Manag. 2021, 33, 100327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Schrot, O.G.; Traxler, J.; Weifner, A.; Kretzer, M.M. Potential of ‘future workshop’ method for educating adolescents about climate change mitigation and adaptation: A case from Freistadt, Upper Austria. Appl. Environ. Educ. Commun. 2020, 20, 256–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kleespies, M.K.; Dierkes, P.W. Personal Assessment of Reasons for the Loss of Global Biodiversity—An Empirical Analysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kowasch, M.; Lippe, D.F. Moral impasses in sustainability education? Empirical results from school geography in Austria and Germany. Environ. Educ. Res. 2019, 25, 1066–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Ng, W. A Partnership-Designed Online Module on Climate Science: Impact on Year 10 Teachers and Students. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2019, 15, 1660–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Walshe, R.A.; Seng, D.C.; Bumpus, A.; Auffray, J. Perceptions of adaptation, resilience and climate knowledge in the Pacific: The cases of Samoa, Fiji and Vanuatu. Int. J. Clim. Change Strateg. Manag. 2018, 10, 303–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ige, O.A.; Jita, L.C.; Jita, T. Major Personality Traits Influencing Environmental Knowledge: A Case Of Urban Learning Ecologies. Probl. Educ. 21st Century 2019, 77, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Vincent, T. Indigenous Knowledge Systems and the Teaching of Climate Change in Zimbabwean Secondary Schools. SAGE Open 2019, 9, 215824401988514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ozlem, Y.T.; Hanife, A. Promoting Climate-friendly Actions of High School Students: A Case from Turkey. Eurasian J. Educ. Res. 2021, 92, 335–358. [Google Scholar]
  94. Kerr, J.Q.; Hess, D.J.; Smith, C.M.; Hadfeld, M.G. Recognizing and Reducing Barriers to Science and Math Education and STEM Careers for Native Hawaiians and Pacifc Islanders. CBE—Life Sci. Educ. 2018, 17, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Valdez, R.; Stevenson, K. How communication with teachers, family and friends contributes to predicting climate change behaviour among adolescents. Environ. Conserv. 2017, 45, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Wynes, S.; Nicholas, K.A. Climate science curricula in Canadian secondary schools focus on human warming, not scientific consensus, impacts or solutions. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Lombardi, D.; Bickel, E.; Bailey, J.; Burrell, S. High school students’ evaluations, plausibility (re) appraisals, and knowledge about topics in Earth science. Sci. Educ. 2018, 102, 153–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rodriguez, M.A.; Angueyra, A.; Andel, T. Ethnobotany of the Sierra Nevada del Cocuy-Güicán: Climate change and conservation strategies in the Colombian Andes. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2018, 14, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Mcneill, K.; Vaughn, M. Urban High School Students’ Critical Science Agency: Conceptual Understandings and Environmental Actions around Climate Change. Res. Sci. Educ. 2010, 42, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Daniel, B.; Stanisstreet, M.; Boyes, E. How can we best reduce global warming? School students’ ideas and misconceptions. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2004, 61, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Karpudewan, M.; Nurulazam, A.; Chandrasegaran, A.L. Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions in Science: Strategies and Perspectives from Malaysia; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Groves, F.H.; Pugh, A.F. Elementary pre-service teacher perceptions of the greenhouse effect. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 1999, 8, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. The Environics Institute for Survey Research. Canadian Opinion about Immigration and Multiculturalism; The Environics Institute for Survey Research: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  104. Mooney, H.; Larigauderie, A.; Cesario, M.; Elmqvist, T.; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; Lavorel, S.; Palmer, M.; Scholes, R.; Yahara, T. Biodiversity, climate change, and ecosystem services. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2009, 1, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Junsheng, H.; Akhtar, R.; Masud, M.; Rana, M.S.; Banna, H. The role of mass media in communicating climate science: An empirical evidence. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 238, 117934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Karpudewan, M. The relationships between values, belief, personal norms, and climate conserving behaviors of Malaysian primary school students. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 237, 117748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Landon, A.; Keith, S.; Tarrant, M.; Rubin, D.; Ling, S. Understanding and modifying beliefs about climate change through educational travel. J. Sustain. Tour. 2019, 27, 292–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Maxwell, S.; Fuller, R.; Brooks, T.; Watson, J. Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature 2016, 536, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Sala, O.E.; Stuart Chapin, F., III; Armesto, J.J.; Berlow, E.; Bloomfield, J.; Dirzo, R.; Huber-Sanwald, E.; Huenneke, L.F.; Jackson, R.B.; Kinzig, A.; et al. Biodiversity—Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 2000, 287, 1770–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Mokhtar, I.; Foo, S.; Majid, S.; Luyt, B.; Theng, Y. Assessing students’ information literacy skills in two secondary schools in Singapore. J. Inf. Lit. 2012, 6, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. German Geographical Society. Educational Standards in Geography for the Intermediate School Certificate; German Geographical Society: Hanover, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  112. Kurt, H. Determining Biology Teacher Candidates’ Conceptual Structures about Energy and Attitudes towards Energy. J. Balt. Sci. Educ. 2013, 12, 399–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Engström, S.; Gustafsson, P.; Niedderer, H. Content for Teaching Sustainable Energy Systems in Physics at Upper Secondary School. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 2011, 9, 1281–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Tatar, E.; Oktay, M. Students’ Misunderstandings about the Energy Conservation Principle: A General View to Studies in Literature. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ. 2007, 2, 79–86. [Google Scholar]
  115. International Energy Agency (IEA). Tracking Clean Energy Progress 2016—Energy Technology Perspectives 2016 Excerpt, IEA Input to the Clean Energy Ministerial; OECDXIEA: Paris, France, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  116. International Energy Agency (IEA). Energy, Climate Change and Environment 2016 Insights; IEA: Paris, France, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  117. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  118. Whitmarsh, L.; O’Neill, S.; Lorenzoni, I. Climate Change or Social Change? Debate within, amongst, and beyond Disciplines. Environ. Plan. A 2011, 43, 258–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow Diagram of the study (adapted from Ref. [57]).
Figure 1. Flow Diagram of the study (adapted from Ref. [57]).
Sustainability 14 05163 g001
Figure 2. Regions where the studies were conducted.
Figure 2. Regions where the studies were conducted.
Sustainability 14 05163 g002
Figure 3. Year of Publication.
Figure 3. Year of Publication.
Sustainability 14 05163 g003
Figure 4. Effects of Climate Change.
Figure 4. Effects of Climate Change.
Sustainability 14 05163 g004
Figure 5. Factors affecting Climate Change.
Figure 5. Factors affecting Climate Change.
Sustainability 14 05163 g005
Figure 6. Mitigation plans in handling the climate change issue.
Figure 6. Mitigation plans in handling the climate change issue.
Sustainability 14 05163 g006
Figure 7. The actions that influence the global competency of secondary school students towards climate change.
Figure 7. The actions that influence the global competency of secondary school students towards climate change.
Sustainability 14 05163 g007
Table 1. Keywords and searching information strategy.
Table 1. Keywords and searching information strategy.
DatabaseSearch String
SCOPUSTITLE-ABS-KEY ((“climate change *” OR “global warming” OR “climate warming” OR “climate variability” OR “environmental change *” OR “climate crisis” OR “global heating” OR “climate fluctuation *” OR “climate action*”) AND (“global competency” OR “global competencies” OR “global competencies cognitive” OR “knowledge *” OR “cognitive skill *” OR “social-emotional *” OR “global competencies affective *” OR “critical thinking *” OR “problem solving” OR “taking action *” OR “proficiency with new technology” OR “respect *” OR “responsible *” OR “empathy” OR “self-discipline *” OR “aware *” OR “curious”) AND (“secondary school *” OR “middle school student *” OR “high school student *” OR “ junior high school student *” OR “preparotary school student *” OR “senior high school student *” OR “prep school student *” OR “college preparatory school student *” OR “intermediate school student *” OR “secondary school pupil *” OR “secondary level student *” OR “middle school pupil *”))
WOSTS=((“climate change *” OR “global warming” OR “climate warming” OR “climate variability” OR “environmental change *” OR “climate crisis” OR “global heating” OR “climate fluctuation *” OR “climate action *”) AND (“global competency” OR “global competencies” OR “global competencies cognitive” OR “knowledge *” OR “cognitive skill *” OR “social-emotional *” OR “global competencies affective *” OR “critical thinking *” OR “problem solving” OR “taking action *” OR “proficiency with new technology” OR “respect *” OR “responsible *” OR “empathy” OR “self-discipline *” OR “aware *” OR “curious”) AND (“secondary school *” OR “middle school student *” OR “high school student *” OR “ junior high school student *” OR “preparotary school student *” OR “senior high school student *” OR “prep school student *” OR “college preparatory school student *” OR “intermediate school student *” OR “secondary school pupil *” OR “secondary level student *” OR “middle school pupil *”))
Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Criteria InclusionExclusion
Publication timeline 2021–20172016 and before
Document type Article (with empirical data)Systematic review, review, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, book series, book, chapter in a book, and conference proceeding
Language English Non-English
Nature of study Related to climate change and global competency of secondary school studentsNot related to climate change and global competency of secondary school students
Table 3. Summary of Country, Experimental Design, Instrument and Sample Size of 35 Selected Articles.
Table 3. Summary of Country, Experimental Design, Instrument and Sample Size of 35 Selected Articles.
AuthorRegion: CountryExperimental DesignInstrumentSample Size
Mohamed Ali Khan, et al. (2021) [64]Asia: MalaysiaQuantitativeQuestionnaire221
Prabawani, et al. (2020) [65]Asia: IndonesiaQuantitativeQuestionnaire336
Kang, et al. (2021) [66]Asia: KoreaQuantitativeQuestionnaire206
Jackson, et al. (2017) [67]Asia: Hong KongMixed MethodsQuestionnaire and Semi-structured Interviews1383 students + 34 students and 4 teachers
Paul,, et al. (2020) [68]Asia: IndiaQuantitativeTest341
Yeh, et al. (2017) [69]Asia: TaiwanMixed MethodsQuestionnaire and Interview1231 + 10
Koulougliotis, et al. (2021) [70]Europe: Athens, GreeceQualitativeDocument analysisAnalysis Content of 107 students.
Biström, et al. (2020) [71]Europe: SwedenQualitativeDocument AnalysisDocument analysis of Textbook
Jiménez-Liso, et al. (2020) [72]Europe: SpainQuantitativeTest47
Montero-Pau, et al. (2020) [73]Europe: SpanishQuantitativeQuestionnaire923
Neset, et al. (2020) [74]Europe: SwedenMixed MethodsObservation and Questionnaire195
Levrini, et al. (2019) [75]Europe: ItalyMixed MethodsTest and Interview24 students
Majer, et al. (2019) [76]Europe: SloveniaQuantitativeQuestionnaire1012
Musitu-Ferrer, et al. (2019) [77]Europe: SpainQuantitativeQuestionnaire797
Kurup, et al. (2020) [78]Europe: United KingdomMixed MethodsQuestionnaire and Semi-structured focus group Interviews65 students (aged 13–14) + a group
Alice, et al. (2017) [79]Europe: EnglandQualitativeInterview focus group41
Dornhoff, et al. (2019) [80]Europe: Ecuador and GermanyQuantitativeQuestionnaire2624
Deisenrieder, et al. (2020) [81]Europe: Austria and GermanyMixed MethodsQuestionnaire, Test, and Interviews169 + 53 + 10
Böhm, et al. (2020) [82]Europe: GermanyQuantitativeQuestionnaire760
Parth, et al. (2020) [83]Europe: AustriaQuantitativeQuestionnaire and Quasi-Experiment2000 respondent + 178 parents
Ganatsa, et al. (2021) [84]Europe: Greece, MediterraneanQuantitativeQuestionnaire600
Schrot, et al. (2021) [85]Europe: Austria and ItalyMixed MethodsQuasi-experiment, Questionnaire and Interviews173 + 231 + 47
Schrot, et al. (2020) [86]Europe: Freistadt, Upper AustriaMixed MethodsTest and Document Analysis41 students + Document analysis
Kleespies, et al. (2020) [87]Europe: GermanyQuantitativeQuestionnaire889
Kowasch, et al. (2019) [88]Europe: Germany, AustriaMixed MethodsQuestionnaire, Interview and Document Analysis1001students + 8 teachers + document analysis of geography textbook
Ng, (2019) [89]Australia and Oceania: AustraliaMixed MethodsQuestionnaire, Interviews, Observations and Open-ended Questions in the Survey260 students and 19 teachers + 10 teachers
Walshe, et al. (2018) [90]Australia and Oceania: Samoa, Fiji and VanuatuMixed MethodsQuestionnaire and Interactive focus groups244 + 72 teachers, 35 media and 55 communities
Ige, et al. (2019) [91]Sub-Saharan Africa: NigeriaQuantitativeQuestionnaire462
Vincent, (2019) [92]Sub-Saharan Africa: NigeriaQualitativeInterviews and focus groupsSix teachers and 20 students
Ozlem, et al. (2021) [93]Middle East: Ankara, TurkeyQualitativeSemi-structured Interviews, Observations and Document Analysis18 respondents + Document analysis of student task
Kerr, et al. (2018) [94]North America: The United States of AmericaQualitativeSelf-Report25 representatives from 14 indigenous people + 3 interns + 4 directors, staff + 2 expert + 2 officer
Valdez, et al. (2017) [95]North America: North CarolinaQuantitativeQuestionnaire1371
Wynes, et al. (2019) [96]North America: CanadaQualitativeInterview and Document AnalysisDocument Analysis of Science Curriculum + 6 teachers
Lombardi, et al. (2018) [97]North America: The United States of AmericaQualitativeContent analysis299
Rodriguez, et al. (2018) [98]South America: Colombian AndesQualitativeSemi-structured Interviews80
Table 4. Summary of elements of climate change that have been used to create climate change awareness among secondary school students.
Table 4. Summary of elements of climate change that have been used to create climate change awareness among secondary school students.
AuthorEffects on Climate ChangeFactors Affecting Climate ChangeMitigation Plan in Handling the Climate Change Issue
GWGHWCDEHPLHAFCUBTDNDWCREECGENM
Mohamed Ali Khan, et al. (2021) [64]XXXX
Prabawani, et al. (2020) [65]X XX X XX
Kang, et al. (2021) [66]
Jackson, et al. (2017) [67]X XX X X
Paul, et al. (2020) [68] XX X XX X
Yeh, et al. (2017) [69]XXX X X
Koulougliotis, et al. (2021) [70]XX
Biström, et al. (2020) [71]
Jiménez-Liso, et al. (2020) [72] X
Montero-Pau, et al. (2020) [73] XXX
Neset, et al. (2020) [74] X XXX X
Levrini, et al. (2019) [75]XXX X X X
Majer, et al. (2019) [76]XXX X X X
Musitu-Ferrer, et al. (2019) [77] X
Kurup, et al. (2020) [78]XX X XX XX X
Alice, et al. (2017) [79]XXXX XXX
Dornhoff, et al. (2019) [80] X X
Deisenrieder, et al. (2020) [81] XX X
Böhm, et al. (2020) [82] X X
Parth, et al. (2020) [83]X XXX XXX XX X
Ganatsa, et al. (2021) [84]XX XX XXX
Schrot, et al. (2021) [85]XXX X
Schrot, et al. (2020) [86] X XXXX
Kleespies, et al. (2020) [87] X X XX XXX
Kowasch, et al. (2019) [88] X X
Ng, (2019) [89] X X X
Walshe, et al. (2018) [90] X
Ige, et al. (2019) [91] X
Vincent, (2019) [92] X X X
Ozlem, et al. (2021) [93] XX
Kerr, et al. (2018) [94] X
Valdez, et al. (2017) [95] X
Wynes, et al. (2019) [96]XX X X
Lombardi, et al. (2018) [97]XXXX XXX XXX
Rodriguez, et al. (2018) [98]X XX X X X X
Notes: GW: Global Warming; GH: Greenhouse Effect; WC: Weather and Climate; D: Disaster; EH: Environmental Health; PL: Pollution; HA; Human activity; FC: Fuel combustion; UB: Urbanization; TD: Technology Development; ND: Natural Disasters; WC: Weather and Climate; RE: Renewable Energy; EC: Environmental care; GE: Green Environment; NM: Natural hazard management.
Table 5. Summary of the actions that influence the global competency of secondary school students towards climate change.
Table 5. Summary of the actions that influence the global competency of secondary school students towards climate change.
AuthorTree-PlantingReduce Energy ConsumptionReduce the Rate of Carbon EmissionsRecycle, Reduce and Reuse
Mohamed Ali Khan, et al. (2021) [64]
Prabawani, et al. (2020) [65] X
Kang, et al. (2021) [66]
Jackson, et al. (2017) [67]XX X
Paul, et al. (2020) [68]X
Yeh, et al. (2017) [69] XX
Koulougliotis, et al. (2021) [70]
Biström, et al. (2020) [71]
Jiménez-Liso, et al. (2020) [72]
Montero-Pau, et al. (2020) [73]
Neset, et al. (2020) [74]
Levrini, et al. (2019) [75]
Majer, et al. (2019) [76]
Musitu-Ferrer, et al. (2019) [77]
Kurup, et al. (2020) [78]XXX
Alice, et al. (2017) [79]
Dornhoff, et al. (2019) [80]
Deisenrieder, et al. (2020) [81] XX
Böhm, et al. (2020) [82]
Parth, et al. (2020) [83]
Ganatsa, et al. (2021) [84] X
Schrot, et al. (2021) [85]
Schrot, et al. (2020) [86] XXX
Kleespies, et al. (2020) [87]
Kowasch, et al. (2019) [88]
Ng, (2019) [89]
Walshe, et al. (2018) [90]
Ige, et al. (2019) [91]
Vincent, (2019) [92]
Ozlem, et al. (2021) [93]
Kerr, et al. (2018) [94]
Valdez, et al. (2017) [95] XXX
Wynes, et al. (2019) [96]
Lombardi, et al. (2018) [97]
Rodriguez, et al. (2018) [98]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Radzi, S.N.F.; Osman, K.; Mohd Said, M.N. Progressing towards Global Citizenship and a Sustainable Nation: Pillars of Climate Change Education and Actions. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5163. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095163

AMA Style

Radzi SNF, Osman K, Mohd Said MN. Progressing towards Global Citizenship and a Sustainable Nation: Pillars of Climate Change Education and Actions. Sustainability. 2022; 14(9):5163. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Radzi, Siti Nur Fatehah, Kamisah Osman, and Mohd Nizam Mohd Said. 2022. "Progressing towards Global Citizenship and a Sustainable Nation: Pillars of Climate Change Education and Actions" Sustainability 14, no. 9: 5163. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop