Next Article in Journal
Philopatry as a Tool to Define Tentative Closed Migration Cycles and Conservation Areas for Large Pelagic Fishes in the Pacific
Previous Article in Journal
Quantifying the Effects of Stand and Climate Variables on Biomass of Larch Plantations Using Random Forests and National Forest Inventory Data in North and Northeast China
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Triple-Helix Intervention Approach to Direct the Marble Industry towards Sustainable Business in Mexico

Sustainability 2022, 14(9), 5576; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095576
by Teodoro Alarcón-Ruíz 1,2, María Evelinda Santiago-Jiménez 2, Loecelia Guadalupe Ruvalcaba-Sánchez 3, Fabiola Sánchez-Galván 4, Luis Enrique García-Santamaría 1 and Gregorio Fernández-Lambert 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2022, 14(9), 5576; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095576
Submission received: 20 March 2022 / Revised: 3 April 2022 / Accepted: 15 April 2022 / Published: 6 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Mining Safety and Sustainability)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors must review and strengthen the article from the approach of the triple helix model, given that now we speak of the quadruple helix: Society, State, Academy and Company. In this sense, it presents methodological weaknesses that are attached to the area of analysis or theoretical bases. The article presents potentialities to be a publishable work, once these weaknesses are overcome and it is aligned with the conceptual, methodological and results bases of the object of study. 

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Neither.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This paper deals with an exciting topic. The article has been read carefully, and some minor issues have been highlighted in order to be considered by the author(s). 

#1 What is the motivation of this paper? 

#2 What is the contribution and novelty of this paper? 

#3 What is the advantage of this survey paper? 

#4 Which evaluation metrics did you used for comparison? 

#5 It would be good if security domains would be reflected in the related work such as BlindNet backdoor: Attack on deep neural network using blind watermark,  Multi-Model Selective Backdoor Attack with Different Trigger Positions, Textual Backdoor Attack for the Text Classification System, and Defending Deep Neural Networks against Backdoor Attack by Using De-trigger Autoencoder, and Ensemble Transfer Attack Targeting Text Classification Systems.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

This paper deals with an exciting topic. The article has been read carefully, and some minor issues have been highlighted in order to be considered by the author(s). 

#1 What is the motivation of this paper? 

#2 What is the contribution and novelty of this paper? 

#3 What is the advantage of this survey paper? 

#4 Which evaluation metrics did you used for comparison? 

#5 It would be good if security domains would be reflected in the related work such as BlindNet backdoor: Attack on deep neural network using blind watermark,  Multi-Model Selective Backdoor Attack with Different Trigger Positions, Textual Backdoor Attack for the Text Classification System, and Defending Deep Neural Networks against Backdoor Attack by Using De-trigger Autoencoder.

Back to TopTop