Next Article in Journal
Soft-Switching Smart Transformer Design and Application for Photovoltaic Integrated Smart City Power Distribution
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Entrepreneurship as a Field of Knowledge: Analyzing the Global South
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Separation of Graphites and Cathode Materials from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Roasting–Froth Flotation

School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered joint first authors.
Sustainability 2023, 15(1), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010030
Submission received: 8 November 2022 / Revised: 13 December 2022 / Accepted: 14 December 2022 / Published: 20 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Waste and Recycling)

Abstract

:
The separation of graphites and cathode materials from spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is essential to close the loop of material used in LIBs. In this study, the roasting characteristics of the spent LIB materials are carefully analyzed, and the effects of roasting on the surface morphology and elemental chemical states of electrode materials are fully investigated by thermogravimetric analysis, SEM-EDS, and XPS to explore the roasting–flotation enhancement mechanism. Then, froth flotation is utilized to separate the graphites and cathode materials from the spent LIB materials. The optimal roasting temperature is determined by thermogravimetric analysis and the SEM-EDS analysis of the spent LIB materials. The results suggest that the organic binder can be effectively removed from the spent LIB materials at the roasting temperature of 500 °C, and there is almost no loss of graphite. The XPS results indicate that, in the process of roasting, the decomposition products of the organic binder can easily react with valuable metals (Ni, Co, and Mn) to produce corresponding metal fluoride. The flotation results of the spent LIB materials after roasting at the optimal conditions indicate that graphites and cathode materials can be efficiently recovered through roasting–froth flotation. When the dosage of kerosene is 200 g/t and the dosage of methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) is 150 g/t, the cathode materials grade is 91.6% with a recovery of 92.6%, while the graphite grade is 84.6% with a recovery of 82.7%. The roasting–froth flotation method lays the foundation for the subsequent metallurgical process.

1. Introduction

The number of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has increased rapidly because of the vigorous promotion of new energy products [1]. The number of spent LIBs also continues to rise rapidly because more LIBs are being used in large quantities [2]. It is predicted that the total global LIB market size will reach over 97.70 GWh, about 1.52 million tons [3], while the number of spent LIBs is expected to increase to 700,000 tons by 2025 [4]. Spent LIBs contain a large number of valuable metals, including Ni, Co, Mn, and Li, which are exceptionally valuable [5]. Recycling spent LIBs is an essential component to developing sustainable energy storage solutions to combat climate change [6,7]. According to statistics, spent LIBs usually contain 5–20% Co, 5–10% Ni, 5–7% Li, 5–10% other metals (Cu, Al, Fe, etc.), 15% organics, and 7% plastics [8]. Effectively recycling these metals will greatly alleviate the shortage of raw materials for LIBs in the future [9]. Simultaneously, spent LIBs also contain electrolytes, binders, and other harmful substances [10,11]. These will cause great harm to the environment if not handled properly. Thus, the effective recovery of spent LIBs is a key problem for which a solution is urgently required [12].
The main purpose of recycling spent LIBs is to recover electrode materials (cathode materials and graphite) [13]. Currently, the related recycling technologies mainly include pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical processes [14,15]. The high-temperature smelting reduction technique is a typical pyrometallurgical process for recycling valuable metals from spent LIBs. The valuable metals are reduced and then recovered in the form of alloys [16]. Spent LIBs are put directly into a smelting furnace without pretreatment. The graphites and organics in the spent LIBs provide heat during combustion, while the metals are reduced and converted to alloys. The obtained alloys are further purified via sulfuric acid (H2SO4) leaching and solvent extraction to obtain cobalt oxides (CoO) and nickel hydroxide (Ni(OH)2). Unfortunately, the graphites and Li elements are either decomposed or wasted [17]. In addition, recycling metals from spent LIBs using the hydrometallurgical method involves inorganic [18] and organic acids [19]. The common inorganic acids used as leaching agents to leach metals from spent LIBs comprise HCl [20], H2SO4 [21], HNO3 [22], and H3PO4 [23]. Organic acids include ascorbic acid [24], citric acid [25], oxalic acid [26], acetic acid [27], and so forth. Lee [22] treated LiCoO2 with 1 mol/L HNO3 at 75 °C. It was revealed that the leaching efficiencies of Li and Co were only 75% and 40%, respectively. While the leaching rates of Co and Li exceeded 99% when the content of H2O2 was 1.7% (v/v), this was mainly because insoluble Co3+ was reduced into soluble Co2+ in the presence of H2O2. Inorganic acids are useful for achieving high metal-leaching efficiency. However, inorganic acids will produce acidic wastewater, Cl2, SO2, and other harmful gases, which will cause environmental pollution [19]. Thus, the leaching of metal from spent LIBs with organic acids is environmentally friendly. Chen [28] developed an economically effective approach for the recycling of valuable metals from spent LIBs that combined reduction leaching with selective precipitation. Citric acid was selected as the leaching agent, and D-glucose was used as the reducing agent to dissolve the spent cathode material. The study was conducted under the following conditions: using a 1.5 mol/L citric acid concentration, 20 g/L S/L ratios, 0.5 g/g reducing agent content, an 80 °C temperature, and a 120 min reaction time; consequently, the leaching efficiencies determined with respect to Li, Ni, Co, and Mn were 99%, 91%, 92%, and 94%, respectively. However, the hydrometallurgical process may damage graphite during the leaching process; thus, it may not be suitable for the upcycling of spent anode materials [7].
Before cathode materials are recycled, it is necessary to separate the graphites from spent LIB materials. It can be seen from the literature review that the degrees of hydrophobicity of the cathode materials and the graphites of spent LIB materials are greatly different; for instance, the cathode material shows hydrophilicity, while graphite shows strong hydrophobicity [13,14,29]. Therefore, froth flotation can be used to separate the graphites and cathode materials from spent LIB materials. In the manufacturing process of LIBs, the electrode materials are attached to the current collectors by an organic binder, which leads to difficulty in terms of dissociation between the electrode material and the collectors [30]. As a result, the surface characteristics of electrode materials change, and so it is difficult to achieve the efficient separation of graphites and cathode electrode materials by flotation. At present, researchers have studied the removal of organic binders on the surface of electrode materials and the consequent use of froth flotation to recover graphites and cathode materials. Zhang [31] used pyrolysis to remove the organics on the surface of electrode materials at 500 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min and a pyrolysis time of 15 min. Then, the graphites and cathode materials were recovered by froth flotation. Reportedly, with a rougher flotation stage, the underflow product obtained had a grade of 94.7% with respect to cathode materials with a recovery of only 83.7%. However, this method greatly increased the cost due to the implementation of pyrolysis under an inert atmosphere. To improve the separation efficiency of the electrode materials of graphites and cathode materials, the removal of organics is necessary. The dissolution method, the low-temperature roasting method, and pyrolysis are the commonly used organic binder removal methods [32,33]. A solvent dissolution method [34] using an organic solvent weakens the adhesion of the binder of the cathode scraps and removes the binder from spent LIB materials. The organic solvent N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) is usually chosen to dissolve the organic binder polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). For example, Contestabile [35] developed a laboratory process for recycling LIBs in which the anode and cathode that were obtained after removing the shell were heated with an NMP solution below 100 °C. This method allowed for LiCoO2 and graphite to be separated from the collector effectively. Zhou [36] chose dimethylformamide (DMF) to dissolve PVDF. They showed that the solubility of PVDF in DMF at 60 °C is 176 g/L. However, the solvents used in the separation process are very expensive and have a certain degree of toxicity, thus posing a threat to the environment and human health. In addition, the dissolved residues still adhere to the surface of electrode material particles, which are difficult to effectively remove, thereby affecting the flotation efficiency of the electrode materials. The pyrolysis method has the advantage of low secondary pollution. Sun and Qiu [37,38,39,40] proposed a novel method with which to separate cathode materials by means of vacuum pyrolysis. Through the process of pyrolysis, the electrolyte and binder were evaporated or decomposed, which reduced the adhesion of the cathode material and collector. When the temperature was between 500 and 600 °C, the separation efficiency increased with the increase in pyrolysis temperature. However, vacuum pyrolysis and pyrolysis under an inert atmosphere are high-cost shortcomings and pose operational difficulties, posing further difficulties with respect to their application in industrial production. Therefore, a low-cost but efficient method of removing the binder PVDF and recovering the graphites and cathode materials from spent LIBs is urgently needed. Roasting–froth flotation could be an already-available method with which to achieve this purpose. The process of roasting under an air atmosphere is adopted for the removal of the binder PVDF with industrialization feasibility. This method is simple and easy to perform. By controlling the roasting temperature, roasting can not only remove the binder PVDF from the spent LIBs but also reduce the loss of graphites. It is expected that the method of roasting–froth flotation will realize the efficient separation and recovery of graphites and cathode materials from spent LIBs.
In this study, the roasting–flotation method is used to remove the organic binder PVDF and separate the graphites and cathode materials from spent LIB materials. The roasting characteristics of the spent LIB materials are carefully analyzed. Thermogravimetric analysis is used to analyze the thermostability of the raw, spent LIB materials roasted in the air. The surface morphology and surface chemical states of the electrode materials under different roasting conditions are determined by SEM-EDS and XPS to obtain the optimum condition of roasting in air, and the mechanism of flotation separation enhanced by roasting is investigated. Based on the analysis results, froth flotation experiments of the spent LIB materials roasting at the optimal roasting condition are conducted to recover graphites and cathode materials and evaluate the separation feasibility of graphite from cathode materials via roasting–froth flotation.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

The spent LIBs used in this study are supplied by the local electronic waste center and they are discharged, crushed, and screened to obtain the spent LIB materials. Powder below 0.25 mm is chosen as the raw spent LIB material in this research. The phase composition of the raw spent LIB materials is determined via X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 advance, Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany), and the setting conditions for the XRD are Cu Ka radiation (λ = 0.1541 nm), 40 keV accelerating voltage, 40 mA current, 3–90° scanning range, and 0.1 s/step (0.02°/step) scan speed. The XRD pattern of the spent LIB materials is shown in Figure 1. It is found from Figure 1 that the raw spent LIB materials are mostly composed of lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide (NCM) and graphite. The metal element compositions of the raw spent LIB materials are analyzed by an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-5000R, Focused Photonics Inc., Beijng, China) and the results are given in Table 1. From Table 1, it can be seen the metal elements in the raw spent LIB materials are Ni, Co, Mn, and Li. The contents of Ni, Co, Mn, and Li are 8.82%, 7.14%, 13.05%, and 3.28%, respectively. From Figure 2, it can be seen that the particle size of the raw spent LIB powders ranges from 6 to ~60 μm, indicating that the raw spent LIB materials have a fine particle size.

2.2. Flotation Experiments

An XFG-type laboratory flotation machine (Jilin Exploration Machinery Plant, Jilin, China) with a volume of 200 mL is used to float the spent LIB materials and the impeller rotation speed is fixed at 1900 r/min. The XFG-type laboratory flotation machine has several flotation cells of different volumes from 20 mL to 200 mL for different amounts of ores from 5 g to 50 g. Using this machine to float a 10 g sample is quite suitable. In the initial phase, about 100 mL of deionized water is used to moisten 10 g of spent LIB material samples and the pulp is transferred to the flotation cell. Subsequently, deionized water is added to the marker line of 200 mL of the flotation cell. Then, the collector (kerosene) is subsequently added to the mineral suspensions and agitated for 2 min. Finally, methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) is added as a frother and the flotation flowsheet is shown in Figure 3. The recovery of graphite is calculated after 3 min of flotation, after which concentrates (graphites) and tailings (cathode materials) are collected, dried, and weighted to calculate the flotation recovery, which can be calculated using the following equation:
R   =   m a m b   ×   100 %
For graphite, where ma stands for the weight of graphite in concentrates (g), mb stands for the total weight of graphite in the flotation feed (g), and R is the recovery (%). For cathode materials, where ma stands for the weight of cathode materials in tailings (g), mb stands for the total weight of cathode materials in the flotation feed (g), and R is the recovery (%).

2.3. Analytical Methods

Thermogravimetric analysis of the raw spent LIB materials is conducted using a thermogravimetric analyzer (Discovery, TGA) over a temperature range of 25–850 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under an air atmosphere. Meanwhile, the airflow is fixed at 40 mL/min. The spent LIB materials before and after roasting are analyzed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM, ZEISS Gemini 300, Carl Zeiss Co., Ltd, Oberkochen, Germany) and X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS, Thermo Scientific K-Alpha, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to show the surface properties. Scattered electron (SE) images of the samples are obtained via SEM and coupled with an energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) detector to allow elemental mapping. The analysis is performed in a low-vacuum pressurized chamber (10 Pa). A 15 kV electron beam and a working distance of around 8.5 mm are used. The XPS tests are carried out at room temperature in an ultra-high-vacuum (UHV) system. The base pressure of the analysis chamber during the measurements is lower than 3 × 10−7 mbar. Al Ka radiation (hv = 1486.6 eV) is from a monochromatized X-ray source. For all analyses, the take-off angle of the photoelectrons is 90° and the spot size is 400 μm. High-resolution spectra are recorded with a pass energy of 50 eV, and the energy step size is 0.1 eV. For flotation concentrate and tailings, 0.1 g is accurately sampled each time and dissolved in 6 mL aqua regia, and then each metal content is tested via ICP-OES to calculate metal recovery and grade.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surface Morphology Analysis of Spent LIB Materials before Roasting

First, a clear investigation of the surface properties of raw spent LIB materials is of great significance to understanding the reason why they need to be roasted before froth flotation. SEM-EDS is used to analyze the surface morphology characteristics of the raw spent LIB materials and the results are shown in Figure 4. Figure 4a,b show the SEM images of raw spent LIB materials and EDS images are shown in Figure 4c–h. Obviously, the raw spent LIB materials are mainly composed of F, C, O, Ni, Co, and Mn elements. It is known from the previous literature [31] that the F element is mainly from PVDF binders and lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6) electrolytes, and the C element is mainly from graphite. In addition, the O, Ni, Co, and Mn elements are mainly from cathode materials. Based on the distribution of the four elements C, Ni, Co, and Mn on the surface of the raw spent LIB materials, combined with the previous XRD analysis, it is known that the smaller particles are cathode materials (NCM), and the larger particles and the lamellar materials are anode materials (graphites), as shown in Figure 4a,b. Some floccules (which are mainly made up of F, O, and C elements) can be clearly seen on the surface of graphites and cathode materials. It can be inferred that the floccules are mainly from the PVDF binder and other organics. The PVDF binder in the raw spent LIB materials is evenly distributed on the surface of the electrode materials and closely bonded with the graphite and cathode materials. It is difficult to separate graphites and cathode materials. Therefore, the effective removal of the PVDF binder is important for the following flotation separation of graphites and cathode materials from spent LIB materials.

3.2. Thermogravimetric Analysis of Raw Spent LIBs Materials

To accurately obtain the thermogravimetric characteristics of the raw spent LIB materials, the thermogravimetric analysis of raw spent LIB materials was carried out. Figure 5 shows the thermogravimetric analysis results of the raw spent LIB materials. From Figure 5, the spent LIB materials present four weightlessness stages, all in the range of room temperature to 850 °C. The first weight-loss stage occurs in a temperature range of room temperature to 150 °C. At this stage, the weight loss rate is 4.08%, and there is no obvious endothermic or exothermic peak in the derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curve, which is attributed to the water being volatilized [38]. The second weight-loss stage appears in the temperature range of 150–450 °C. This is attributed to the thermal decomposition of electrolytes remaining in the spent LIB materials [39], and the weight loss rate is 5.18%. The third weight-loss stage is in the temperature range of 450–550 °C. This stage mainly comprises the combustion reaction of PVDF on the surface of the electrode materials [37], and the weight loss rate is 3.48%. The last weight-loss stage is in the temperature range of 550–850 °C. At this stage, the graphite is mainly oxidized and burned, and the weight loss rate reaches 28.41% [40]. Overall, the decomposition temperature of the binder PVDF is between 450 and 550 °C and the optimal roasting temperature of the spent LIB materials needs to be explored in greater detail.

3.3. SEM-EDS Analysis of Spent LIB Materials at Different Roasting Temperatures

To intuitively observe the surface morphology changes and element characteristics of spent LIB materials under different roasting conditions, the SEM-EDS analysis is used to investigate the spent LIB materials after roasting at different temperatures for an hour, and the results are shown in Figure 6. As can be seen from Figure 6a–d, after the spent LIB materials are roasted at 400 °C for 1 h, the range of the F element is significantly reduced and the floccule (the PVDF binder) still exists on its surface, indicating that the PVDF binder on the surface of the spent LIB materials is partly removed. As the roasting temperature increases, when the roasting temperature reaches 500 °C, the floccule on the surface of the electrode materials disappears, indicating that the binder PVDF on the surface of the spent LIB materials is completely removed. In addition, the EDS results suggest that the F element is uniformly distributed on the surface of the cathode materials. When the roasting temperature reaches 600 °C, as can be seen from Figure 6i–l, there is also no PVDF binder in the spent LIB materials. The surfaces of the graphites in Figure 6j are rougher than in Figure 6f. This is because most of the graphites had been oxidized when the roasting temperature reached 600 °C. The EDS analysis shows that F elements still appear on the surface of the cathode material, indicating that the decomposition product of the PVDF binder can easily react with the valuable metals (Ni, Co, Mn) to produce corresponding metal fluoride. Combining Figure 4 with Figure 6, it is deducted that roasting could remove the PVDF binder from the surfaces of spent LIB materials. As the roasting temperature increases, the PVDF binder and electrolytes are gradually removed, but too high a temperature could lead to the oxidation or even the burning of graphites. The optimal roasting condition to completely remove the organic binder PVDF while avoiding the loss of graphites is roasting at 500 °C for 1 h. To sum up, under the optimal roasting condition, the binder PVDF and electrolytes in the spent LIB materials are completely removed so that the cathode materials and graphites are effectively separated, resulting in a significant increase in the floatability difference between the cathode materials and graphites, which improves the feasibility of flotation.

3.4. XPS Analysis

XPS is a useful tool to detect the surface chemical states of active materials [41]. Herein, XPS is used to analyze the surface properties of spent LIB materials before and after roasting. Figure 7 shows the C spectra of spent LIB materials before and after roasting at the optimum roasting condition, and the peak binding energy and atomic content of C are shown in Table 2.
From Figure 7a, before roasting, the C 1s are composed of seven peaks with binding energies of 284.4, 284.8, 285.7, 286.6, 287.8, 288.5, and 290.5 eV. The binding energy of 284.4 eV is mainly graphite material with a content of 43.05%. The binding energy of 285.7, 287.8, and 288.5 eV mainly contribute to C-COOR, O-C-O, and O-C=O, respectively. In addition, the functional group -(CH2CF2)-n at 286.6 eV and -(CF2CH2)-n at 290.5 eV are mainly derived from the organic PVDF binder on the electrode surface [42]. Figure 7b presents the C spectra of spent LIB materials after roasting. From Figure 7b, the C 1s are composed of five peaks with binding energies of 284.4, 284.8, 286.7, 288.6, and 291.6 eV. The C1s peak at 284.4 eV was mainly graphite, and its content increased from 43.05% before roasting to 50.55%, indicating that organics in the electrode material were effectively removed and more of the graphite surface was exposed. The binding energy at 288.8 eV is mainly contributed by C=O, which is mainly caused by the thermal decomposition and oxidation of C-COOR, O-C-O, and O-C=O in the organics. The binding energy of 286.6 and 291.6 eV is mainly contributed to C-H and C-F, which is mainly caused by the thermal decomposition of PVDF. Overall, the organic PVDF binder in spent LIB materials is effectively removed at the optimum roasting condition.
Figure 8 shows the F spectra of spent LIB materials before and after roasting at the optimum roasting condition, and the peak binding energy and atomic content of F are shown in Table 3. From Figure 8a, before roasting, the F 1 s are composed of four peaks with binding energies of 685.67, 686.97, 687.85, and 688.52 eV, attributed to Li-F, Al-F, -(CH2CF2)-n, and P-F. The P-F peak at 688.52 eV is derived from the electrolyte (LiPF6) [43]. The binding energy of -(CH2CF2)-n at 687.85 eV is derived from PVDF, and the atomic ratio is 33.27%. The Al-F with binding energy at 686.97 eV is mainly generated in the charging and discharging process of the battery, and the content is 29.56%. Li-F with binding energy at 685.67 eV is derived from LiF compounds generated in the charging and discharging process of the battery and LiF compounds generated in the decomposition of LiPF6, and account for 23.43%. After roasting, from Figure 8b, the P-F peak disappeared completely, suggesting that the LiPF6 electrolyte underwent complete decomposition. The C-F peak at 687.85 eV is attributed to the oxidative decomposition of PVDF, and the content is only 3.05%. The contents of the Al-F/Co-F peak and Mn-F/Ni-F peak at 686.69 eV and 685.90 eV are 6.91% and 60.87%, respectively, and are mainly derived from the transfer of the F element in electrolytes and organics and its combination with valuable metals such as Ni, Co, and Mn to form metal fluoride. The content of the Li-F peak at 685.10 eV is 29.17%, which is partly due to the transfer of the F element in electrolyte and organic binder and its combination with valuable metal Li to form metal fluoride. According to the analysis of the chemical state of the F element combined with the existing literature, a possible reaction route was inferred (Reactions (1)–(3)) [39,43]. All in all, the XPS results suggest that the organic binders and electrolytes have been completely decomposed after roasting. Parts of the valuable metals react with the decomposition products of organics to produce corresponding metal fluoride, and the results are consistent with SEM analysis.
LiPF6 → LiF + PF5
PF5 + H2O → POF3 +2HF
POF3 + H2O →POF2(OH) +HF

3.5. Flotation Experiments

The cathode materials of roasted spent LIB materials are mainly composed of NCM, which has strong hydrophilicity. In addition, the anode materials are composed of graphites, which have strong hydrophobicity [44]. Therefore, froth flotation technology can be used to effectively separate graphites and cathode materials. According to the results of the existing literature, using kerosene as a collector and MIBC as a frother presents an excellent collecting effect on graphite [14]. Therefore, in this manuscript, the effects of kerosene and MIBC concentrations on the separation of graphites and cathode materials in the spent LIB materials after roasting at 500 °C for 1 h are discussed, respectively, and the results are shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10. Among them, Figure 9a and Figure 10a present the grades and recoveries of graphites in concentrates, while Figure 9b and Figure 10b display the grades and recoveries of cathode materials in tailings.
Figure 9 shows the effect of different kerosene dosages on flotation results. From Figure 9, it can be noted that the kerosene displays an excellent collecting ability for graphites when the MIBC dosage is fixed at 100 g/t, indicating that the kerosene can be used to separate graphite from spent LIB materials. The grade of graphites and cathode materials gradually increased and then became stable with the increase in kerosene dosage. Meanwhile, the recoveries of graphites and cathode materials gradually decreased. When the kerosene dosage reaches 200 g/t, the cathode materials’ grade is 91.32% with a recovery of 92.93%, and the graphite grade is 85.02% with a recovery of 81.96%. In addition, with the continued increase in kerosene dosage, the recoveries of graphites and cathode materials remain almost constant. Thus, the optimal kerosene dosage is fixed at 200 g/t. Based on this, the effect of MIBC dosage on the flotability of graphites is further investigated, and the results are shown in Figure 10. From Figure 10, with an increase in MIBC dosage, the recovery of graphite increases slowly from 74.9% at the dosage of 25 g/t to 82.7% at the dosage of 150 g/t. Meanwhile, the grade of cathode materials increases gradually from 88.3% to 91.6%. Furthermore, an increase in MIBC dosage results in a slow decrease in graphite recovery and cathode material grade. When the dosage of MIBC increases from 150 g/t to 250 g/t, the recovery of graphite decreases steadily from 82.7% to 81.1%, and the grade of the cathode materials decreases from 91.6% to 91%. It is apparent that excessive MIBC will reduce the separation efficiency of graphite and cathode materials. Importantly, the grade and recovery of both graphites and cathode materials are high during the whole flotation process, which indicates that it is easy to separate graphites from cathode materials when the spent LIB materials are roasted at 500 °C for 1 h. In conclusion, when the kerosene dosage reaches 200 g/t and the MIBC dosage reaches 150 g/t, the best separation of graphites and cathode materials is reached: the cathode material grade is 91.6% with a recovery of 92.6%, and the graphite grade is 84.6% with a recovery of 82.7%.

4. Conclusions

The recovery of graphites and cathode materials represents a strategic point in the recycling process of spent LIB materials. In this paper, a roasting–froth flotation process for recovering the graphite and cathode materials of spent LIBs is investigated. In the range of 400–600 °C, the PVDF binder and electrolytes on the surface of the spent LIB materials are gradually removed with an increase in roasting temperature, and the optimal roasting temperature and time are 500 °C and 1 h, respectively. The organic PVDF binder on the surface of the spent LIB materials is effectively removed and the graphites show no obvious loss under optimal conditions. After roasting, the cathode materials and graphites are obviously separated from the spent LIB materials, which greatly improves the floatability difference between cathode materials and graphites. A comprehensive investigation and evaluation of the recovery process of spent LIB materials are undertaken based on the analysis roasting process. The flotation results suggest that it is easy to separate graphites from cathode materials when the spent LIB materials are roasted at the optimal roasting condition. When the dosage of kerosene reaches 200 g/t and the dosage of MIBC is 150 g/t, the cathode materials grade is 91.6% with a recovery of 92.6% and the graphite grade is 84.6% with a recovery of 82.7%. Based on this present result, graphites and cathode materials can be easily recovered through roasting–froth flotation. Then, via further purification operations, high-quality graphites and cathode material products can be obtained without losing the graphites from the spent LIB materials. Thus, this may lay the foundation for closing the loop for spent LIB materials in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Z. and Y.T.; methodology, J.Z.; software, L.W.; validation, J.Z., J.L. and Y.W.; formal analysis, L.W.; investigation, Y.W.; resources, Y.T.; data curation, M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.Z. and J.L.; visualization, M.S.; supervision, Y.W.; project administration, Y.T.; funding acquisition, Y.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51974325).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zeng, X.; Li, J.; Singh, N. Recycling of spent lithium-ion battery: A critical review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 44, 1129–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Feng, Z.L.; Dongrun, Y.; Tao, D.; He, G.; Bin, L.W. The current process for the recycling of spent lithium ion batteries. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 578044. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yingjie, Z.; Peichao, N.; Xuan, Y.; Peng, D.; Yan, L.; Qi, M. New research progress on recycling technology of spent ternary lithium ion battery. Chem. Ind. Eng. Prog. 2020, 39, 2828–2840. [Google Scholar]
  4. Nasser, O.A.; Petranikova, M. Review of achieved purities after li-ion batteries hydrometallurgical treatment and impurities effects on the cathode performance. Batteries 2021, 7, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zheng, X.; Zhu, Z.; Lin, X.; Zhang, Y.; He, Y.; Cao, H.; Sun, Z. A mini-review on metal recycling from spent lithium ion batteries. Engineering 2018, 4, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gavin, H.; Roberto, S.; Emma, K.; Laura, D.; Peter, S.; Rustam, S.; Allan, W.; Paul, C.; Oliver, H.; Simon, L.; et al. Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Nature 2019, 575, 75–86. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ruiting, Z.; Zhenzhen, Y.; Ira, B.; Lei, P. Significance of a solid electrolyte interphase on separation of anode and cathode materials from spent li-ion batteries by froth flotation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 531–540. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ordoñez, J.; Gago, E.J.; Girard, A. Processes and technologies for the recycling and recovery of spent lithium-ion batteries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 60, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, X.; Xie, Y.; Lin, X.; Li, H.; Cao, H. An overview on the processes and technologies for recycling cathodic active materials from spent lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2013, 15, 420–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ellingsen, L.A.W.; Majeau-Bettez, G.; Singh, B.; Srivastava, A.K.; Valøen, L.O.; Strømman, A.H. Life cycle assessment of a lithium-ion battery vehicle pack. J. Ind. Ecol. 2014, 18, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zeng, X.; Li, J.; Liu, L. Solving spent lithium-ion battery problems in China: Opportunities and challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 52, 1759–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, J.; Thomas, H.R.; Francis, R.W.; Lum, K.R.; Wang, J.; Liang, B. A review of processes and technologies for the recycling of lithium-ion secondary batteries. J. Power Sources 2008, 177, 512–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Hu, T.; Bai, X.; Wang, S.; Xie, W.; Hao, J.; He, Y. Recovery of LiCoO2 and graphite from spent lithium-ion batteries by cryogenic grinding and froth flotation. Miner. Eng. 2020, 148, 106223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhan, R.; Oldenburg, Z.; Pan, L. Recovery of active cathode materials from lithium-ion batteries using froth flotation. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2018, 17, e00062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, Y.; Han, G.; Liu, J.; Chai, W.; Wang, W.; Yang, S.; Su, S. A stepwise recovery of metals from hybrid cathodes of spent Li-ion batteries with leaching-flotation-precipitation process. J. Power Sources 2016, 325, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zheng, X.; Gao, W.; Zhang, X.; He, M.; Lin, X.; Cao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Z. Spent lithium-ion battery recycling—Reductive ammonia leaching of metals from cathode scrap by sodium sulphite. Waste Manag. 2017, 60, 680–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kwon, O.-S.; Sohn, I. Fundamental thermokinetic study of a sustainable lithium-ion battery pyrometallurgical recycling process. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 158, 104809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dorella, G.; Mansur, M.B. A study of the separation of cobalt from spent Li-ion battery residues. J. Power Sources 2007, 170, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yao, L.; Feng, Y.; Xi, G. A new method for the synthesis of LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 from waste lithium ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 44107–44114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barik, S.P.; Prabaharan, G.; Kumar, L. Leaching and separation of Co and Mn from electrode materials of spent lithium-ion batteries using hydrochloric acid: Laboratory and pilot scale study. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 147, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ferreira, D.A.; Prados, L.M.Z.; Majuste, D.; Mansur, M.B. Hydrometallurgical separation of aluminium, cobalt, copper and lithium from spent Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2008, 187, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, C.K.; Rhee, K.-I. Preparation of LiCoO2 from spent lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2002, 109, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, X.; Ma, H.; Luo, C.; Zhou, T. Recovery of valuable metals from waste cathode materials of spent lithium-ion batteries using mild phosphoric acid. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 326, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nayaka, G.P.; Manjanna, J.; Pai, K.V.; Vadavi, R.; Keny, S.J.; Tripathi, V.S. Recovery of valuable metal ions from the spent lithium-ion battery using aqueous mixture of mild organic acids as alternative to mineral acids. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 151, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, L.; Dunn, J.B.; Zhang, X.X.; Gaines, L.; Chen, R.J.; Wu, F.; Amine, K. Recovery of metals from spent lithium-ion batteries with organic acids as leaching reagents and environmental assessment. J. Power Sources 2013, 233, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zeng, X.; Li, J.; Shen, B. Novel approach to recover cobalt and lithium from spent lithium-ion battery using oxalic acid. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 295, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gao, W.; Song, J.; Cao, H.; Lin, X.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Z. Selective recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries—Process development and kinetics evaluation. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 178, 833–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, X.; Fan, B.; Xu, L.; Zhou, T.; Kong, J. An atom-economic process for the recovery of high value-added metals from spent lithium-ion batteries. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 3562–3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pindar, S.; Dhawan, N. Rapid recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries using microwave route. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2020, 147, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhang, L.; Guo, S. Microwave pyrolysis of macadamia shells for efficiently recycling lithium from spent lithium-ion batteries. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 396, 122740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, G.; He, Y.; Wang, H.; Feng, Y.; Xie, W.; Zhu, X. Application of mechanical crushing combined with pyrolysis-enhanced flotation technology to recover graphite and LiCoO2 from spent lithium-ion batteries. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 1418–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fan, E.; Li, L.; Lin, J.; Wu, J.; Yang, J.; Wu, F.; Chen, R. Low-temperature molten-salt-assisted recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 16144–16150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, F.; Zhang, T.; He, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, Y. Recovery of valuable materials from spent lithium-ion batteries by mechanical separation and thermal treatment. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 185, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Song, D.; Wang, X.; Zhou, E.; Hou, P.; Guo, F.; Zhang, L. Recovery and heat treatment of the Li(Ni 1/3 Co 1/3 Mn 1/3 )O2 cathode scrap material for lithium ion battery. J. Power Sources 2013, 232, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Contestabile, M.; Panero, S.; Scrosati, B. A laboratory-scale lithium-ion battery recycling process. J. Power Sources 2001, 92, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhou, X.; He, W.-Z.; Li, G.-M.; Zhang, X.-J.; Huang, J.-W.; Zhu, S.-G. Recycling of electrode materials from spent lithium-ion batteries. In Proceedings of the 2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Chengdu, China, 18–20 June 2010; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu, W.; Zhong, X.; Han, J.; Qin, W.; Liu, T.; Zhao, C.; Chang, Z. Kinetic study and pyrolysis behaviors of spent LiFePO4 batteries. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 1289–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhong, X.; Liu, W.; Han, J.; Jiao, F.; Qin, W.; Liu, T. Pretreatment for the recovery of spent lithium ion batteries: Theoretical and practical aspects. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 263, 121439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.; Tu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Yang, E. Separating metal impurities from spent ternary Li-ion batteries materials based on the roasting characteristics. Ionics 2022, 28, 1833–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, P.; Xiao, L.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ye, L.; Zhu, Y. Study on the reduction roasting of spent LiNixCoyMnzO2 lithium-ion battery cathode materials. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 136, 1323–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tian, R.; Su, J.; Ma, Z.; Song, D.; Shi, X.; Zhang, H.; Li, C.; Zhang, L. Influences of surface Al concentration on the structure and electrochemical performance of core-shell LiNi 0.8 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O2 cathode material. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 337, 135769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, T.; He, Y.; Wang, F.; Li, H.; Duan, C.; Wu, C. Surface analysis of cobalt-enriched crushed products of spent lithium-ion batteries by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 138, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kawamura, T.; Okada, S.; Yamaki, J.-I. Decomposition reaction of LiPF6-based electrolytes for lithium ion cells. J. Power Sources 2006, 156, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Paulson, O.; Pugh, R.J. Flotation of inherently hydrophobic particless in aqueous solutions of inorganic electrolytes. Langmuir 1996, 12, 4808–4813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction pattern of the raw spent LIB materials.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction pattern of the raw spent LIB materials.
Sustainability 15 00030 g001
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of the raw spent LIB materials.
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of the raw spent LIB materials.
Sustainability 15 00030 g002
Figure 3. Flotation flow sheet of spent LIB materials.
Figure 3. Flotation flow sheet of spent LIB materials.
Sustainability 15 00030 g003
Figure 4. SEM-EDS analysis of the raw spent LIB materials: (a,b) SEM, (c) C element EDS, (d) F element EDS, (e) O element EDS, (f) Ni element EDS, (g) Co element EDS, (h) Mn element EDS.
Figure 4. SEM-EDS analysis of the raw spent LIB materials: (a,b) SEM, (c) C element EDS, (d) F element EDS, (e) O element EDS, (f) Ni element EDS, (g) Co element EDS, (h) Mn element EDS.
Sustainability 15 00030 g004
Figure 5. Thermogravimetric analysis of the raw spent LIB materials.
Figure 5. Thermogravimetric analysis of the raw spent LIB materials.
Sustainability 15 00030 g005
Figure 6. SEM-EDS analysis of spent LIB materials roasting at different temperatures for an hour: (ad) 400 °C, (eh) 500 °C, (il) 600 °C (blue box areas are the locations of EDS analysis performed within).
Figure 6. SEM-EDS analysis of spent LIB materials roasting at different temperatures for an hour: (ad) 400 °C, (eh) 500 °C, (il) 600 °C (blue box areas are the locations of EDS analysis performed within).
Sustainability 15 00030 g006
Figure 7. XPS analysis of raw spent LIB materials and roasted product: (a) C of raw spent LIB materials, (b) C of roasted product at 500 °C for 1 h.
Figure 7. XPS analysis of raw spent LIB materials and roasted product: (a) C of raw spent LIB materials, (b) C of roasted product at 500 °C for 1 h.
Sustainability 15 00030 g007
Figure 8. XPS analysis of raw spent LIB materials and roasted product: (a) F of raw spent LIB materials, (b) F of roasted product at 500 °C for 1 h.
Figure 8. XPS analysis of raw spent LIB materials and roasted product: (a) F of raw spent LIB materials, (b) F of roasted product at 500 °C for 1 h.
Sustainability 15 00030 g008
Figure 9. The influence of kerosene dosage on the flotation effect of the spent LIB materials after roasting at 500 °C for 1 h: (a) graphite recovery and grade, (b) cathode materials’ recovery and grade.
Figure 9. The influence of kerosene dosage on the flotation effect of the spent LIB materials after roasting at 500 °C for 1 h: (a) graphite recovery and grade, (b) cathode materials’ recovery and grade.
Sustainability 15 00030 g009
Figure 10. The influence of MIBC dosage on the flotation effect of the spent LIB materials after roasting at 500 °C for 1 h: (a) graphite recovery and grade, (b) cathode materials’ recovery and grade.
Figure 10. The influence of MIBC dosage on the flotation effect of the spent LIB materials after roasting at 500 °C for 1 h: (a) graphite recovery and grade, (b) cathode materials’ recovery and grade.
Sustainability 15 00030 g010
Table 1. Metal element compositions of the raw spent LIB materials.
Table 1. Metal element compositions of the raw spent LIB materials.
ElementsLiNiCoMnOthers (Graphite + Organics)
Wt/%3.288.827.1413.0567.71
Table 2. XPS spectrum composition of C1s before and after roasting.
Table 2. XPS spectrum composition of C1s before and after roasting.
ComponentsRaw Spent LIB MaterialsComponentsRoasted Materials
Peak
(BE)
FWHM (eV)Atomic
(%)
Peak
(BE)
FWHM (eV)Atomic
(%)
Graphite284.40.9343.05Graphite284.40.6850.55
C-C/C-H284.81.7327.53C-C/C-H284.81.6425.00
C-COOR285.71.2113.68C-H286.62.4012.60
-(CH2CF2)-n286.60.935.45C=O288.82.405.92
O-C-O287.81.103.62C-F291.62.405.92
O-C=O288.51.333.09
-(CF2CH2)-n290.51.313.44
Table 3. XPS spectrum composition of F1s before and after roasting.
Table 3. XPS spectrum composition of F1s before and after roasting.
ComponentsRaw Spent LIB MaterialsComponentsRoasted Materials
Peak
(BE)
FWHM (eV)Atomic
(%)
Peak
(BE)
FWHM (eV)Atomic
(%)
Li-F685.671.4123.43Li-F685.101.5729.17
Al-F686.971.6929.56Mn-F/Ni-F685.901.4560.87
-(CH2CF2)-n687.851.6333.27Al-F/Co-F686.891.616.91
P-F688.522.4013.84C-F687.851.443.05
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Sun, M.; Wang, L.; Tu, Y. Separation of Graphites and Cathode Materials from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Roasting–Froth Flotation. Sustainability 2023, 15, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010030

AMA Style

Zhang J, Li J, Wang Y, Sun M, Wang L, Tu Y. Separation of Graphites and Cathode Materials from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Roasting–Froth Flotation. Sustainability. 2023; 15(1):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jie, Jiapeng Li, Yu Wang, Meijie Sun, Lufan Wang, and Yanan Tu. 2023. "Separation of Graphites and Cathode Materials from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Roasting–Froth Flotation" Sustainability 15, no. 1: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010030

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop