Next Article in Journal
Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements in Agricultural Soils of Al-Ahsa Oasis, Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Journal
Cost Analysis of Implementing In-Pipe Hydro Turbine in the United Arab Emirates Water Network
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Causes and Behavioral Evolution of Negative Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication: Considering the Mediating Role of User Involvement and the Moderating Role of User Self-Construal

School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(1), 660; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010660
Submission received: 1 November 2022 / Revised: 7 December 2022 / Accepted: 26 December 2022 / Published: 30 December 2022

Abstract

:
The purpose of this study is to develop a framework to examine the intrinsic driving paths of negative electronic word-of-word. In this paper, the “contextual” factor—user involvement, and the “individual” factor—user self-construal were selected to consider their influence on the model path. Data were collected using online questionnaires; then, the model and hypotheses were tested using structured equation model (SEM) software. The research results showed that, firstly, negative online shopping experiences positively influence eWOM motivations, and user involvement partially mediated the relationship between negative product quality, negative online shopping platform environments and negative eWOM motivations; secondly, there was a significant correlation between negative eWOM motivations and eWOM behavior, and the personality traits of the communicators themselves influenced the path of “negative eWOM motivation-negative eWOM behavior”. In addition, the user’s self-construal has a significant moderating effect on the “eWOM motivation–immediate eWOM behavior” path under immediate eWOM behavior.

1. Introduction

WOM is a type of communication between consumers concerning a product, service or company that occurs between a communicator and a recipient, who perceives the information received as noncommercial [1]. These interpersonal communications provide information beyond what is provided by the company and that involuntarily influences an individual’s decision. Since the senders are independent from the market, this gives them increased credibility [2]. This independence makes WOM a more reliable and credible medium. Today’s new form of online WOM communication is known as electronic word-of-mouth. One of the most comprehensive conceptions of eWOM was proposed by Litvin et al., who described it as all of the informal communication via the internet addressed to consumers and related to the use or characteristics of goods or services or the sellers thereof [3]. The advantage is that the platform is open to all consumers and anyone can see another’s comments on the platform and share their opinions with other users. In the past, the only information channels for consumers to learn about products or services were friends and family, but now they are more likely to learn through eWOM [4]. At present, there are three major types of IWOM platforms: the first is a shopping platform’s own post-purchase evaluation system, which mainly evaluates the products, logistics and after-sales services related to completed transactions; the second is the dissemination of eWOM information through virtual community platforms, where a group of like-minded users communicate and share eWOM information through community websites; the third are life service websites that provide users with information and preferential activities on dining, entertainment and other life services. Disgruntled consumers can damage the image of a brand, even if it was previously recognized as offering high-quality goods [5]. Negative eWOM communications can adversely affect user attitudes and purchase intentions as well as a company’s brand image. This can lead to undesirable long-term outcomes, such as brand dilution, fluctuations in stock returns and the overall erosion of a company’s value [6]. Therefore, companies need to pay attention to online electronic word-of-mouth communication. These organizations should have the ability to react to negative eWOM during the exposure phase, as negative eWOM can also be amplified through social media channels.
Previous studies have found that eWOM has a significant impact on consumer decision making in the restaurant, hospitality and travel industries [7,8,9]. Studies have examined which experiences motivate customers to actively participate in eWOM and the impact of eWOM on consumer behavior. Based on this, this paper focused on the intrinsic driving mechanisms of negative IWOM. This paper innovatively considered the impact on the model from both the contextual and individual dimensions. As mentioned above, the study of eWOM communication is a comprehensive research proposition that integrates factors such as consumer behavior, communication and psychology. The generation of negative eWOM is a complex process that combines contextual factors and individual factors. However, previous studies have rarely considered the impact of these two factors on negative word-of-mouth communication as a whole. Finally, this paper selected the two dimensions of the “contextual” factor—user involvement, and the “individual” factor—user self-construal to consider their influence on the model path. The selection of these two types of variables not only improved the construction of the two models, but also broadened ideas for future research.
This study focused on the antecedents and consequences of negative eWOM motivation based on the above discussion. The first part focuses on how negative online shopping experiences stimulate the generation of negative eWOM motivation and whether the contextual factor mediates this process. The second part explores how negative eWOM motivations further evolve into word-of-mouth behavior and whether individual factor plays a moderating role in this transformation.

2. Literature Review and Hypothesis

2.1. Negative Online Shopping Experience and User Involvement

According to Zaichkowsky’s research, involvement is the degree of self-concern caused by the attributes of a product or service, which affects the perceived quality of the product and brand preference [10]. Matthes et al. argued that user involvement is the degree to which users perceive a product to be relevant to them based on their needs, goals or interests [11]. It describes a consumer’s subjective perception of the product or service in question. Andrews found that there are two main types of factor that influence user involvement based on the elaboration likelihood model; one is based on personal needs, goals and characteristics, such as personal values, cultural background, cognitive needs and perceptions of information and personal relevance; the other is based on context and decision making, such as the consumption environment and product usage experience [12]. Specifically, if the negative shopping experience is due to negative product quality, this means that consumers are likely to be dissatisfied with being cheated; then, consumers are likely to collect information to prove that the product quality is substandard, and consumer involvement is increased. If consumers find that the platform kills familiarity in the process of online shopping, that is, for the same goods or services, the old users see that the price is much more expensive than do the new users, this will inevitably lead to the dissatisfaction of the old users, and they may make complaints and find other ways to defend their rights and interests. Or perhaps there is a lack of information regarding the goods displayed on the platform and users will inevitably make more search efforts to obtain more information. If an item logistically cannot be delivered at the agreed upon time, or even in the case of lost pieces, then consumers have to spend more time and energy on logistics or negotiate with the merchant, and the degree of involvement increases. If consumers do not receive effective help and timely solutions when they encounter problems after purchase, this will greatly reduce the consumer’s goodwill towards the brand, especially for expensive goods, which will affect the consumer’s involvement. In summary, the following hypotheses were proposed for the study:
Hypothesis 1 (H1). 
User involvement has a positive correlation with negative online shopping experience.
H1a. 
User involvement has a positive correlation with negative product quality.
H1b. 
User involvement has a positive correlation with negative after-sales service.
H1c. 
User involvement has a positive correlation with negative online shopping platform environments.
H1d. 
User involvement has a positive correlation with negative logistics services.

2.2. The Mediating Role of User Involvement

Some studies have used user involvement as an independent variable to explore its effect on user attitudes and behaviors. Lai-Ying Leong et al. found that user involvement was an important factor influencing hotel booking intentions [13]. More studies have used user involvement as a mediating and moderating variable. Tuu and Olsen argue that engagement plays a mediating role in satisfaction and repurchase loyalty [14]. Product involvement moderates the relationship between eWOM and purchase intention [15]. User involvement moderates the relationship between composite attitudes and eWOM behavior [16].
This study attempted to further explore the role of involvement as an intermediate variable in the evolutionary path from shopping failure to emotional feedback. Due to the virtual nature of the online shopping process, users are unable to visually experience the goods they want to purchase and, therefore, can only use the information provided by the merchant as the basis for their purchase decision evaluation. In such a transaction process, cognitive dissonance is likely to occur. Unpleasant shopping experiences can be divided into process failures and outcome failures, both of which can seriously affect consumers’ shopping experience and trigger emotional changes [17]. Consumers’ emotions directly reflect their satisfaction with the shopping process [18]. eWOM motivation arises when users are unhappy with their online shopping experience and increased involvement also leads to an increased incentive to spread negative word of mouth [19]. Zeelenberg and Pieter found that negative consumer emotions associated with negative online purchases, such as regret and disappointment, showed a significant positive correlation with negative word-of-mouth communication, and this relationship was strengthened when user involvement increased [20].
Sundaram et al. argue that “consumer experience and motivation are closely related during word-of-mouth communication.” They suggested that negative word-of-mouth communication motivations include helping others, relieving emotions, retaliating against businesses and seeking information [21]. Wetzer et al. summarize that negative online word-of-mouth communication motivations include psychological comfort, emotional venting, seeking help, bringing people closer together, self-indulgence, self-presentation, warning other users and retaliating against businesses [22]. The potential motivations for consumers to engage in eWOM vary depending on the nature of the consumer experience. Consumers engage in eWOM after a negative online shopping experience primarily to prevent others from experiencing the problems they encountered, to relieve their own anger, anxiety and frustration, retaliate against the company associated with the negative consumer experience, and obtain advice on how to resolve the problem. In summary, the following hypotheses were proposed:
Hypothesis 2 (H2). 
Negative eWOM motivation has a positive correlation with user involvement.
Hypothesis 3 (H3). 
User involvement mediates the relationship between negative online shopping experience and negative eWOM motivation.
H3a. 
User involvement mediates the relationship between product quality and negative eWOM motivation.
H3b. 
User involvement mediates the relationship between after-sales service and negative eWOM motivation.
H3c. 
User involvement mediates the relationship between platform environment and negative eWOM motivation.
H3d. 
User involvement mediates the relationship between logistics service and negative eWOM motivation.
The study proposed a conceptual framework, as shown in Figure 1.

2.3. Negative eWOM Motivations and Behavior

Motivation is the behavioral driver that drives people to achieve their goals. The theory of reasoned action suggests that people will search for relevant information and predict the consequences before deciding whether to carry out a certain behavior and, therefore, human behavior is rational [23]. Ajzen introduced perceived control variables based on the above theory and concluded that the three factors that determine behavioral intentions include behavioral attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control [24]. Thereafter, the technology acceptance model, proposed by Davis, based on the theory of rational behavior and the theory of planned behavior, further introduced perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use to systematically explain the relationship between behavioral willingness and behavior itself. According to the theory of technology acceptance model proposed by Davis, the strength of behavioral intention directly affects the occurrence or absence of behavior [25]. Therefore, the motivation of user word-of-mouth communication directly determines word-of-mouth behavior. When users perceive eWOM as a way to alleviate negative emotions, specific motivations drive their behavior. In studying customers’ eWOM behavior in a hotel setting, Yaou Hu found that venting and financial incentives were prominent predictors of negative eWOM behavior [26]. In negative emotional states, tourists’ eWOM motivations include blowing off steam, seeking revenge, reminding others and seeking help [9]. Consumers often reduce their stress and anxiety after a negative shopping experience by posting negative eWOM [27]. In a study on consumer posting reviews in virtual communities, it was noted that the research showed that negative eWOM motivations had a significant moderating effect on service remediation and consumer satisfaction. Higher levels of service redress independently increase positive consumer responses [28]. Negative eWOM communication is subject to a combination of factors such as the degree of damage of the negative online shopping experience and user personality traits, and its transmission mechanism is not invariant. Berger and Schwartz further distinguished eWOM communication behaviors into ongoing and immediate word-of-mouth based on duration [29]. In summary, study 2 proposed the following hypotheses:
Hypothesis 4 (H4). 
Negative eWOM motivation has a positive correlation with immediate eWOM behavior.
Hypothesis 5 (H5). 
Negative eWOM motivation has a positive correlation with ongoing eWOM behavior.

2.4. The Moderating Role of User Self-Construal

Self-construal represents a set of thoughts, feelings and behaviors towards the relationship between the self and others and the distinction between the self and others [30]. It mainly reflects the differences in the meaning of “self” under the influence of Eastern and Western cultures. This paper focused on the moderating role of user self-construal in the evolution of word-of-mouth communication motivation on behavior, drawing on Markus’ typical classification of self-structure types, namely, independent self-construal and dependent self-construal [31]. Independent self-structures are usually independent of the social context, emphasizing the individual’s inner abilities, thoughts and feelings; pursuing uniqueness and self-expression; and focusing on inner attributes and the achievement of personal goals. They usually engage in communication in a straightforward manner. In contrast, dependent self-constructors are “flexible and versatile” selves related to social contexts. They usually define themselves based on external attributes, such as social status or relationships. In addition, they try to adapt and find a sense of belonging and participate in communication indirectly. Independent self-construal consumers are more likely to spread WOM by their own related motivations such as self-enhancement, while interdependent self-construal consumers are more likely to spread WOM with the motive of helping others [32].
The altered psychological states resulting from negative online shopping experiences impact differently on individuals due to differences in self-construal. Studies have shown that interdependent individuals respond more strongly to the post-purchase intention and word of mouth than independent individuals [33]. Wu et al. found that independent self-construal can moderate the effect of electronic word-of-mouth fragmentation on consumer order decisions [34]. Lee et al. explored how consumers’ self-construal can affect consumers’ eWOM behavior through two cognitive factors in the context of a social networking site. In addition, self-construal theory has also been widely used in various contexts, such as advertising [35], organizational behavior [36] and brand connection [37]. The virtual nature of the online world blurs people’s otherwise real-life personality traits and people may exhibit very different personality traits online than they do in reality. Such changes urgently require experiments to analyze the relationship between negative motivations and eWOM behavior on the Internet. In summary, study 2 proposed the following hypotheses:
H6a. 
Independent self-construal moderates the relationship between negative eWOM motivation and immediate eWOM behavior.
H6b. 
Independent self-construal moderates the relationship between negative eWOM motivation and ongoing eWOM behavior.
H7a. 
Interdependent self-construal moderates the relationship between negative eWOM motivation and immediate eWOM behavior.
H7b. 
Interdependent self-construal moderates the relationship between negative eWOM motivation and ongoing eWOM behavior.
The study proposed a conceptual framework, as shown in Figure 2.

3. Methodology

3.1. Measures and Questionnaire

We conducted a literature review and a discussion of variables in order to operationalize the constructs and create a questionnaire. As shown in Appendix A, we designed a structured questionnaire with two parts. The first part concerned personal details, including gender, age, occupation and education; the second part consisted of 35 questions on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). As shown in Table 1, a total of 318 valid respondents’ responses were collected; 145 of them were female (52.9%) and 173 were male (47.1%). The majority of the respondents (319 or 76.3%) were 21–30 years old. A total of 293 (73.7%) had earned a bachelor’s degree, while 25 (12.2%) had earned a master’s degree.

3.2. Reliability and Validity

In this study, reliability was assessed using the CITC index and Cronbach’s alpha (α) coefficient. The overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the questionnaire in this paper was 0.792 and the standardized Cronbach’s alpha was 0.793, which proves that the overall reliability of the questionnaire was good. For each item, the CITC was greater than 0.7 and the α was greater than 0.7, which are well above the suggested thresholds [38]. We used the average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) to assess the convergent validity, as suggested by Fornell and Larcker [38]. As shown in Table 2, for each item, the CR was higher than 0.8 and the AVE was greater than 0.5, which are well above the suggested thresholds. The discriminant validity was assessed by comparing the correlations among the latent variables with the square root of the AVE. As shown in Table 3, the square root of the AVE for the construct was higher than its correlation coefficient with other variables, indicating that results of the research were suitable for subsequent structural equation modeling analysis.

4. Results

To evaluate the structural model, this study was conducted in two phases. The first stage used SPSS and AMOS to validate the fit of conceptual model 1 and the significance of the hypothesized paths, and the bootstrap method of bias correction was used to test for the mediating effects of user involvement. The second stage also used SPSS and AMOS to verify the effect of negative eWOM motivation on eWOM behavior and group regression to test the moderating effect of self-construal.

4.1. Structural Model 1

As shown in Table 4, the model fit and values were found to be in the acceptable range, except for the relative fit index (RFI); therefore, the fit of study 1′s model was good.
From Table 5, negative product quality and negative online shopping platform environments were positively related to user involvement; therefore, H1a and H1c were verified. This demonstrates that all four negative online shopping experiences were positively related to negative eWOM motivations. User involvement was positively associated with negative eWOM motivations; thus, H2 was supported. By comparing the magnitude of the path coefficients, it is easy to find that product quality had the greatest impact on negative eWOM motivation and product quality had the greatest impact on user involvement, indicating that users are still most concerned about the product quality itself. However, the online shopping platform environment had the smallest path coefficient on the motivation of negative eWOM communication, indicating that its influence is minimal. As shown in Table 6, it was found that the values of AGFI and χ 2 / df decreased, and the other indexes were significantly optimized. The value of RFI was closer to the ideal value, which was completely within the acceptable range. From Table 7, the modified model was significant on the remaining paths; that is, the remaining seven hypotheses are all valid.
Since some hypotheses in model 1 did not pass the test, it was planned to modify this model by simplifying it. Hence, the two insignificant paths of “negative after-sales service quality → user involvement degree” and “negative logistics service quality → user involvement degree” in model 1 were deleted.

4.2. Mediation Effects

This paper used the bootstrap method to test for mediating effects, with 2000 replicate samples and a 95% confidence interval.
H3 verified that user involvement had a partial mediating effect between the four negative online shopping experiences and negative eWOM motivation. From Table 8, the 95% CI intervals of the indirect effects of product quality and online shopping platform environment did not include 0, which verified the existence of mediating effects; similarly, the 95% CI intervals of direct effects did not include 0, which also indicated the existence of partial mediating effects, and the results were consistent with the discriminatory results of the path coefficient method. Therefore, the total mediating effect of user involvement in the influence of product quality and online shopping platform environment on negative eWOM motivation was significant.

4.3. Structural Model 2

The results of the fit index of the structural equation model were calculated using Amos software. As shown in Table 9, except for the PGFI index, which was slightly higher than the fit standard, other indexes were within the standard interval. Therefore, the model for study 2 had a high degree of fit.
As shown in Table 10, H4 and H5 are both supported. This shows that there was a significant positive correlation between the motivation of negative online word-of-mouth communication and the two kinds of communication behaviors.
H4 and H5 verify that there was a significant positive correlation between the negative eWOM motivation and the two types of eWOM behavior. Whether it is a short-term transmission form or a lasting transmission form, both are generated by motivational stimulation. From the perspective of behavior categories, the path coefficient of immediate word-of-mouth communication is higher than that of ongoing word-of-mouth communication, indicating that such behavioral intentions are stronger; that is, users are more willing to use online comments and other forms of word-of-mouth communication. The above results show that the relationship between negative eWOM motivation and immediate eWOM behavior is stronger than that of ongoing eWOM behavior, which proves that users are more inclined to spread eWOM through immediate forms, such as posting negative reviews online after generating eWOM motivation.

4.4. Moderation Effects

This paper explored the moderating effect of user self-construal types using grouped regressions and, therefore, examined the moderating effect of self-construal on eWOM motivation under two types of word-of-mouth behaviors separately.
H6 and H7 tested whether self-construal has a moderating effect on eWOM motivation under two types of eWOM behaviors. As shown in Table 11, under immediate eWOM behavior, the significance of the F-test statistic for both regression models was 0, and the model was significant overall. In the model for interdependent self-construal, negative eWOM motivation could explain 85.9% of the immediate eWOM behavior. In the model of independent self-construal, negative eWOM motivation could explain 83.9% of the immediate eWOM behavior. The t-statistic of the moderating model of self-construal under the immediate word of mouth behavior was 1.832, and the concomitant probability was 0.067, which means that the original hypothesis was rejected with a 10% confidence interval and the moderating effect was significant. The moderating effect of different user self-construal on the “motivation–immediate word-of-mouth” model was found to be significant. Therefore, H6a and H7a were supported. In terms of specific personality types, independent self-construal moderates negative eWOM motivation and immediate online word-of-mouth behavior more significantly, because the coefficient of the independent variable X for the interdependent personality model was 0.952, which is smaller than the coefficient of the independent personality model at 1.034. After experiencing an unpleasant shopping experience, these customers are more likely to give quick and timely feedback on their post-purchase experience and vent their emotions by posting online reviews and other forms.
As shown in Table 12, the models of interdependent and independent personality on eWOM motivation pass the significance test. The t-statistic of the moderating model of self-construal on negative eWOM motivation under ongoing electronic word-of-mouth behavior was calculated at 0.0819, and its concomitant probability was 0.413, which means that the original hypothesis was accepted with a 10% confidence interval and the moderating effect was not significant; thus, H6b and H7b were not supported.

5. Discussion

5.1. Summary

Based on the results, the main conclusions of the paper are as follows:
  • The results of the empirical analysis showed that negative product quality, negative platform environment, negative logistics and negative after-sales service all had different degrees of influence on the motivation of negative eWOM communication. There is a significant positive correlation between negative product quality and negative platform environment and user involvement.
  • User involvement was positively associated with negative eWOM communication motivations and was partially mediated between negative product quality, negative online shopping platform environment and negative eWOM motivation.
  • There was a significant positive correlation between negative eWOM motivation and the two kinds of eWOM communication behaviors.
  • Under immediate eWOM behavior, the user’s self-construal moderated the relationship between eWOM motivation and immediate eWOM behavior, while this moderating effect is not significant under ongoing eWOM behavior.
Conclusion 1 further confirms that the experience of shopping failure is an important trigger of emotional changes in consumers. It can be inferred that users are still most concerned about the product itself, and that while users choose to shop online and enjoy the favorable price and convenient logistics, they do not lower their expectations of the product and service quality itself. The online shopping platform environment is an important factor affecting consumers’ shopping experience. According to the ELM model, online shopping experiences can be divided into central path cues and edge path cues, central path cues include factors such as community atmosphere environment in addition to product quality itself, and this variable has a significant impact on word-of-mouth communication intention [39]. However, there was no strong statistical evidence that the online shopping platform environment has a significant effect on users’ negative word-of-mouth communication motivations. Therefore, this paper argues that the unpleasantness brought to users by a terrible shopping experience, to some extent, undermines the unpleasantness formed due to the unfriendly online shopping platform environment, as users care most about the product itself. This is also reflected by the fact that the product quality dimension had the highest path coefficient among the four factors. Moreover, we believe that in addition to “hard” services such as logistics services, users are increasingly concerned about “soft” services such as after-sales maintenance, the lack of which is more likely to cause dissatisfaction. Previous studies have investigated the effect of information diversity and valence on influencing the level of user engagement [40], and the effect of the dimensions of negative online shopping experience on user engagement complements previous studies.
Conclusion 2 suggests that increased user engagement leads to increased negative eWOM motivation. This study is consistent with the findings of Cheung et al. [41]. If users are willing to invest personal energy (physically, emotionally and cognitively) into an online shopping experience, they will have a higher propensity to spread word-of-mouth communication about it. In addition, contextual factors in a given environment are important factors influencing the level of user engagement. This finding is similar to that of the study by Mclean et al. [42]. From the perspective of path coefficients, there is a significant positive correlation between product quality dimensions and platform context and user engagement. Product quality remains the primary factor influencing user engagement. The environment of the online shopping platform had the second highest impact on user engagement. A bad online shopping platform environment consumes users’ energy in the shopping process, increases search costs and, thus, affects the generation of negative IWOM communication motivations.
Conclusions 3 and 4 show that both immediate and ongoing eWOM behaviors are generated by motivation, which further validates that the construction of this study’s model was consistent with the S–O–R framework. The path coefficients of immediate eWOM behaviors were higher than those of ongoing eWOM behaviors, indicating that users have stronger intentions to engage in immediate eWOM behaviors. This paper focuses on the effect of users’ personality traits on word-of-mouth communication, a study that differs from Yan Li et al.’s approach of using self-construal as a mediator of product scarcity and WOM willingness [43]. The results of the SEM show that negative eWOM motivations significantly affect eWOM behavior. Independent individuals are freer to express themselves on an online platform without being influenced by other voices; therefore, independent personality constructs have a more significant moderating effect on the motivation and immediate eWOM communication, and this finding is similar to that of Song et al. that independent self-construal weakens the negative impact of electronic word-of-mouth dispersion on order decision [44]. Interdependent individuals are more concerned about the social attributes of their behavior, so they are more rational and cautious. This is consistent with Hoffman et al.’s findings that consumers’ interdependent self-construal does not impact their sharing behavior, purchase intention and WOM [33].

5.2. Theoretical Implications

The theoretical contribution of this study was the exploration of the intrinsic driving mechanisms of negative eWOM communication behavior by considering the mediating role of user engagement and the moderating role of self-construal. Since previous studies have only empirically examined which experiences in offline contexts trigger positive eWOM, this paper fills the research gap on the effect of experiences in online contexts on negative eWOM. The SEM results suggest that all four dimensions of negative online shopping experience have an impact on the motivation of negative eWOM communication, while user engagement plays a partly mediating role in the middle. A partial positive relationship between consumer involvement and eWOM intention was identified [45]. If the level of involvement is high, consumers will pay more attention to the specific product and its information. After purchase, consumers are expected to have stronger emotional reactions and thus be more eager to share information about the product [46]. However, our study noticed that negative experiences enhance user involvement by providing more time and effort.
The study also found that the communicator’s own personality traits can shape the negative oral transmission motivation–negative oral transmission behavior path. However, this moderating effect was not always significant for the different types of eWOM behaviors. Compared with dependent personality constructs, individuals with independent self-constructs are more likely to give timely feedback on their post-purchase experiences and vent their emotions after experiencing unpleasant shopping experiences by posting online reviews. This further confirms the effectiveness of the self-construct on social media success.

5.3. Managerial Implications

Consuming in nonphysical scenarios means that users have to pay a greater cost of trust. Therefore, users measure the quality of online shopping in a holistic dimension, and the lack of any aspect can cause an unpleasant shopping experience for users which, in turn, causes a lack of trust. Therefore, online retailers need to pay attention to service recovery after service failure. When merchants provide service remedies that satisfy users, users will not be motivated to spread negative word-of-mouth and, subsequently, they will not engage in negative eWOM communication. They may even become propagators of corporate image building.
Given that eWOM behavior is inconsistent among individuals with different types of self-construal, it is necessary for companies to focus on user traits and introduce big data analysis techniques for user profiling. In the era of big data, users’ purchasing habits, browsing records and evaluation information are clearly presented in the background. Businesses should conduct user profiling based on the information they already have, and carry out targeted and accurate marketing and corporate image maintenance for users. In fact, negative eWOM communication is often an irrational act of unplanned behavior. By establishing a membership mechanism and maintaining a community of users, merchants can provide users with a channel to vent, a space to discuss and a platform to seek help in order to guide word-of-mouth and then take accurate service remedies to reduce the negative impact to a manageable level.

6. Limitations and Future Research

The sample size of this paper was not rich enough to cover adequately the situation of internet users in all regions of China. From the regional scope of respondents’ responses, as shown by the ID at the backend of the questionnaire, it is obvious that the respondents were concentrated in East China, and there were few respondents in Central and Western China. The reason was that people in the eastern region have a higher level of internet participation. The regional distribution tended to reflect the economic strength of the respondents, which is also an important influencing factor on the eWOM of users. In addition to considering user personality traits, future research models could introduce income level, education level and length of online shopping as control variables to enrich the model construction and provide targeted suggestions for enterprise word-of-mouth crisis management.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H.; Methodology, Y.H.; Software, J.W.; Investigation, Y.H., J.W. and M.W.; Data curation, J.W.; Writing—original draft, J.W.; Writing—review & editing, M.W.; Supervision, M.W.; Project administration, Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 16BGL088).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Basic information.
Table A1. Basic information.
Gendera. Male           b. Female
Agea. <20b. 21–30c. 31–40d. 41–50
Educationa. High schoolb. Collegec. Undergraduated. Mastere. Doctor
Online shopping experience (years)a. Less than 1 yb. 1–2 yc. 3–5 yd. 6–10 ye. More than 10 y
Careera. Studentb. Teacherc. Civil Servantd. Company employeee. Self-employed
Monthly Revenue (RMB)a. 0–3000b. 3001–6000c. 6001–10,000d. 10,000–15,000e. >15,000
Table A2. Questionnaire.
Table A2. Questionnaire.
Items for Negative Product QualityInconformity ←--------→ Conformity
1       2       3       4       5       6       7
1. The actual product received is not the same as the product shown in the picture on the page.
2. Merchants resell defective products that have been returned or exchanged.
3. The date of manufacture of products purchased online (especially food) is not fresh (expired).
Items for After-sales service qualityInconformity--------conformity
1       2       3       4       5       6       7
1. Human customer service cannot respond to after-sales inquiries in a timely manner or shows impatience in their attitude.
2. The merchant’s process for handling returns and exchanges is cumbersome and the review speed for refunds is slow.
3. In the event of a price reduction within the price guarantee period, the merchant is willing to compensate the difference in price for the consumer who has purchased the product.
Items for Online shopping platform environmentsInconformity--------conformity
1       2       3       4       5       6       7
1. The information on the product detail page is incomplete and the advertising content is exaggerated.
2. The rules of online shopping coupons, allowances, reductions and other promotional activities are complicated, and the prompt of not meeting the conditions of the offer often occurs when paying
3. Merchants often raise prices before discounting, misleading consumers with false discounts.
Items for Logistics service qualityInconformity--------conformity
1       2       3       4       5       6       7
1. In order to save costs, sellers choose low-cost logistics, rather than high-quality logistics like “SF”.
2. There is a “false shipment” where the merchant has confirmed the shipment but there is a delay in the collection information.
3. When the logistics information is not updated for a long time, the seller cannot help communicate with the logistics in time.
Items for User involvementInconformity--------conformity
1       2       3       4       5       6       7
1. I will carefully compare the intended products across platforms and will not place an order until I have selected the most cost-effective product.
2. I will vigorously defend my rights even if it takes a lot of time and effort.
3. If the merchant’s service remedies do not satisfy me, I will further complain through other channels.
Items for Negative eWOM motivationInconformity--------conformity
1       2       3       4       5       6       7
1. I want to vent my frustration by posting negative comments.
2. I want to show my professionalism and gain the approval of other users by posting negative reviews.
3. I want to get amusement by posting negative reviews.
4. I hope to punish the merchant by posting negative reviews to warn other consumers not to buy this product.
5. I want to get advice and help from other users by posting negative reviews.
Items for Self-construalInconformity--------conformity
1       2       3       4       5       6       7
1. I am able to be consistent with anyone.
2. I am curious and willing to try new things.
3. I would rather reject someone outright than be misunderstood.
4. In small groups, I often play the “leader” role.
5. Speaking in public is no problem for me.
6. If I disagree with my colleagues, I will give in to avoid arguments.
7. My parents’ opinions have a great influence on me when it comes to life events such as studying and choosing a career.
8. For the good of the group, I would rather sacrifice my own interests.
9. I prefer people who are modest and prudent.
10. When my family and friends around me feel happy, I feel happy too.
Items for Negative eWOM behaviorInconformity--------conformity
1       2       3       4       5       6       7
1. Once an unpleasant shopping experience occurs, I will publish a bad review on the platform as soon as possible.
2. When I have an unpleasant shopping experience, I may tell people around me through social media such as wechat.
3. Once an unpleasant shopping experience occurs, I will quickly apply to the user service (administrator) of the online shopping platform for intervention.
4. Long after I had a bad shopping experience, I would leave comments on information sharing sites describing my bad shopping experience.
5. I would repeatedly post and reply to negative posts I had posted in order to get more attention.
6. I will write a post about my impressive negative online shopping experience on social platforms such as Douban, Little Red Book.

References

  1. Arndt, J. Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product. J. Mark. Res. 1967, 4, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brown, J.; Broderick, A.J.; Lee, N. Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network. J. Interact. Mark. 2007, 21, 2–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Litvin, S.W.; Goldsmith, R.E.; Pan, B. Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tour. Manag. 2008, 29, 458–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nieto, J.; Hernández-Maestro, R.M.; Muñoz-Gallego, P.A. Marketing decisions, user reviews, and business performance: The use of the Toprural website by Spanish rural lodging establishments. Tour. Manag. 2014, 45, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Arruda Filho, E.J.M.; Barcelos, A.D.A. Negative online word-of-mouth: Consumers’ retaliation in the digital world. J. Glob. Mark. 2021, 34, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Álvarez-Monzoncillo, J.M.; de Haro Rodríguez, G.; Picard, R.G. Digital word of mouth usage in the movie consumption decision process: The role of Mobile-WOM among young adults in Spain. Int. J. Media Manag. 2018, 20, s107–s128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kumari, P.; Sangeetha, R. How Does Electronic Word of Mouth Impact Green Hotel Booking Intention? Serv. Mark. Q. 2022, 43, 146–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jeong, E.; Jang, S.S. Restaurant experiences triggering positive electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) motivations. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2011, 30, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, S.; Yan, Q.; Yan, M.; Shen, C. Tourists’ emotional changes and eWOM behavior on social media and integrated tourism websites. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2020, 22, 336–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zaichkowsky, J.L. Measuring the involvement construct. J. Consum. Res. 1985, 12, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mittal, B.; Lee, M.S. A causal model of consumer involvement. J. Econ. Psychol. 1989, 10, 363–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hoy, M.G.; Andrews, J.C. Adherence of prime-time televised advertising disclosures to the “clear and conspicuous” standard: 1990 versus 2002. J. Public Policy Mark. 2004, 23, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Leong, L.-Y.; Hew, T.-S.; Ooi, K.-B.; Lin, B. Do electronic word-of-mouth and elaboration likelihood model influence hotel booking? J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2019, 59, 146–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tuu, H.H.; Olsen, S.O. Ambivalence and involvement in the satisfaction-repurchase loyalty relationship. Australas. Mark. J. 2010, 18, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sarwar, M.A.; Awang, Z.; Nasir, J.; Sabiu, I.T.; Usop, R.; Muhamad, S.F. Antecedents and Outcome of Electronic Word of Mouth (EWOM): Moderating Role of Product Involvement. J. Manag. Oper. Res. 2019, 1, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y. Compound attitudes, user engagement and eWOM: An empirical study on WeChat. In Proceedings of the CONF-IRM 2015, Songdo, Republic of Korea, 24–26 March 2015. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wu, L. The antecedents of user satisfaction and its link to complaint intentions in online shopping: An integration of justice, technology, and trust. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2013, 33, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, H.; Jayawardhena, C.; Osburg, V.S.; Yoganathan, V.; Cartwright, S. Social sharing of consumption emotion in electronic word of mouth (eWOM): A cross-media perspective. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 132, 208–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schoner-Schatz, L.; Hofmann, V.; Stokburger-Sauer, N.E. Destination’s social media communication and emotions: An investigation of visit intentions, word-of-mouth and travelers’ facially expressed emotions. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2021, 22, 100661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zeelenberg, M.; Pieters, R. Beyond valence in user dissatisfaction: A review and new findings on behavioral responses to regret and disappointment in failed services. J. Bus. Res. 2004, 57, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sundaram, D.S.; Mitra, K.; Webster, C. Word of-Mouth Communications: A Motivational Analysis. Adv. Consum. Res. 1998, 25, 527–531. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wetzer, I.M.; Zeelenberg, M.; Pieters, R. “Never eat in that restaurant, I did!” Exploring why people engage in negative word-of-mouth communication. Psychol. Mark. 2008, 24, 661–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hale, J.L.; Householder, B.J.; Greene, K.L. The theory of reasoned action. In The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2002; Volume 14, pp. 259–286. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ajzen, I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action Control; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 1985; pp. 11–39. [Google Scholar]
  25. Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hu, Y.; Kim, H.J. Positive and negative eWOM motivations and hotel customers’ eWOM behavior: Does personality matter? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 75, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Calancie, O.; Ewing, L.; Narducci, L.D.; Horgan, S.; Khalid-Khan, S. Exploring how social networking sites impact youth with anxiety: A qualitative study of Facebook stressors among adolescents with an anxiety disorder diagnosis. Cyberpsychology J. Psychosoc. Res. Cyberspace 2017, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Komunda, M.; Osarenkhoe, A. Remedy or cure for service failure? Effects of service recovery on customer satisfaction and loyalty. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2012, 18, 82–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Berger, J.; Schwartz, E.M. What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth? J. Mark. Res. 2011, 48, 869–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Singelis, T.M. The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 1994, 20, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Markus, H.R.; Kitayama, S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 1991, 98, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Seo, J.Y.; Scammon, D.L. Does feeling holier than others predict good deeds? Self-construal, self-enhancement and helping behavior. J. Consum. Mark. 2014, 31, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hofmann, V.; Schwayer, L.M.; Stokburger-Sauer, N.E.; Wanisch, A.T. Consumers’ self-construal: Measurement and relevance for social media communication success. J. Consum. Behav. 2021, 20, 959–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, W.L.; Song, M.M.; Duan, Y.C.; Hong, Y.; Sui, W.J. The Influence of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Dispersion on Order Decision from the Perspective of Self-Construal. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1994, 012024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Van Baaren, R.B.; Ruivenkamp, M. Self-construal and values expressed in advertising. Soc. Influ. 2007, 2, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, H.; van Rijn, M.B.; Sanders, K. Perceived organizational support and knowledge sharing: Employees’ self-construal matters. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2020, 31, 2217–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fazli-Salehi, R.; Torres, I.M.; Madadi, R.; Zúñiga, M.Á. The Role of Self-Construal and Competitiveness in Consumers’ Self-Brand Connection with Domestic vs. Foreign Brands. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2021, 33, 319–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, J.; Qian, C.; He, M.T. A study of location-based online comment information sharing behavior in virtual communities. Intell. Sci. 2018, 36, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nisar, T.M.; Prabhakar, G.; Ilavarasan, P.V.; Baabdullah, A.M. Up the ante: Electronic word of mouth and its effects on firm reputation and performance. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 53, 101726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheung, C.M.; Thadani, D.R. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decis. Support Syst. 2012, 54, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. McLean, G.; Wilson, A. Shopping in the digital world: Examining customer engagement through augmented reality mobile applications. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 101, 210–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Y.; Wu, R.; Li, D.; Fan, H. Can scarcity of products promote or restrain consumers’ word-of-mouth in social networks? The moderating roles of products’ social visibility and consumers’ self-construal. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 95, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Song, M.; Law, R.; Duan, Y. What are the obstacles in the way to “avoid landmines”? Influence of electronic word-of-mouth dispersion on order decision from the self-construal perspective. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 107, 103334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chu, S.C.; Lien, C.H.; Cao, Y. Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) on WeChat: Examining the influence of sense of belonging, need for self-enhancement, and consumer engagement on Chinese travellers’ eWOM. Int. J. Advert. 2019, 38, 26–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Alhidari, A.; Iyer, P.; Paswan, A. Personal level antecedents of eWOM and purchase intention, on social networking sites. J. Cust. Behav. 2015, 14, 107–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of model 1.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of model 1.
Sustainability 15 00660 g001
Figure 2. Conceptual framework of model 2.
Figure 2. Conceptual framework of model 2.
Sustainability 15 00660 g002
Table 1. Sample Demographics.
Table 1. Sample Demographics.
Characteristics FrequencyPercent
GenderMale17354.40%
Female14545.60%
Age≤203511.01%
21–3012037.74%
31–405818.24%
41–506420.13%
≥514112.89%
EducationHigh school5717.92%
College13642.77%
Undergraduate10031.45%
Master144.40%
Doctor113.46%
Age of online shopping≤1 y123.77%
1–2 y5918.55%
3–5 y16451.57%
5–10 y7122.33%
≥10y123.77%
JobStudent3811.95%
Teacher3912.26%
Civil Servant3210.06%
Self-employed13040.88%
Employees6821.38%
Jobless/freelance113.46%
Monthly revenue0–30004714.78%
3000–600014144.34%
6000–10009730.50%
10,000–15,000216.60%
≥15,000123.77%
Table 2. Cronbach’s α, CR, AVE and factor loadings.
Table 2. Cronbach’s α, CR, AVE and factor loadings.
CITCαCRAVELoadings
Product Quality (A)A10.7590.8870.8570.6660.791
A20.8630.852
A30.7210.804
After-sales Service (B)B10.7800.9200.9120.7770.803
B20.8850.967
B30.8490.867
Platform Environment (C)C10.7700.8960.8720.6960.774
C20.8700.914
C30.7460.810
Logistics Service (D)D10.7410.8900.8440.6430.802
D20.8710.794
D30.7480.811
User Involvement (E)J10.7280.8870.8200.6030.786
J20.8690.724
J30.7450.817
Negative eWOM Motivation (F)F10.7970.9350.9160.6860.863
F20.8170.817
F30.8320.724
F40.8500.813
F50.8350.913
Self-construal type (G)G10.8630.9670.9660.7400.856
G20.8560.846
G30.8290.820
G40.8160.826
G50.8910.901
G60.8420.886
G70.8670.890
G80.8060.811
G90.8320.857
G100.8930.903
Negative eWOM behavior (H)H10.8490.9490.9190.6550.791
H20.8590.857
H30.8410.783
H40.8220.821
H50.8950.803
H60.8020.799
Table 3. Discriminant validity.
Table 3. Discriminant validity.
MeanSDABCDEFGH
A4.7971.4010.863
B4.7601.3630.3530.881
C4.7871.3890.2560.2450.861
D4.8671.4240.3470.4520.3090.861
E4.8201.4570.4920.3380.3670.3010.871
F4.9501.4340.3750.4200.4740.4430.3010.876
G4.9411.3770.2020.2670.2340.3230.4210.1180.860
H4.9971.3500.2210.3970.3310.1420.3110.2240.3060.809
Note: SD: Standard Deviation.
Table 4. Fitting Results of Model 1.
Table 4. Fitting Results of Model 1.
Test StatisticRMRRMSEAGFIRFICFIPGFI Χ 2 / df
Result0.0420.0000.970.8740.9080.5470.885
Table 5. Path Coefficient of Model 1.
Table 5. Path Coefficient of Model 1.
Hypotheses and PathsLoad FactorStandard Errorp Value
H1a: User involvement ← Negative product quality0.4010.055*
H1b: User involvement ← Negative after-sale service−0.1300.0900.151
H1c: User involvement ← Negative online shopping platform environment0.3720.026*
H1d: User involvement ← Negative logistics service−0.0050.0260.848
H2: Negative eWOM motivation ← User involvement0.5200.033*
H3a: Negative eWOM motivation ← Negative product quality0.5020.021*
H3b: Negative eWOM motivation ← Negative after-sale service0.4230.027*
H3c: Negative eWOM motivation ← Negative online shopping platform environment0.2770.037*
H3d: Negative eWOM motivation ← Negative logistics service0.3310.036*
Note: * indicate p < 0.001.
Table 6. Fitting Results of Modified Model 1.
Table 6. Fitting Results of Modified Model 1.
RMRRMSEAGFIRFICFIPGFI Χ 2 / df
Original results0.0420.0000.9700.8740.9080.5470.885
Modified results0.0440.0000.9730.8870.9100.5510772
Table 7. Path Coefficient of Modified Model 1.
Table 7. Path Coefficient of Modified Model 1.
Hypotheses and PathsLoad FactorStandard Errorp Value
H1a: User involvement ← Negative product quality0.4740.047 *
H1c: User involvement ← Negative online shopping platform environment0.3920.015 *
H2: Negative eWOM motivation ← User involvement0.5310.038 *
H3a: Negative eWOM motivation ← Negative product quality0.5750.006 *
H3b: Negative eWOM motivation ← Negative after-sale service0.3230.1150.006
H3c: Negative eWOM motivation ← Negative online shopping platform environment0.2790.042 *
H3d: Negative eWOM motivation ← Negative logistics service0.3270.033 *
Note: * indicate p < 0.001, p represents the significance of the interaction between paths. When p < 0.05, the paths are significant.
Table 8. Mediation effect test in model 1.
Table 8. Mediation effect test in model 1.
EffectBias Corrected 95% CI
Product Quality → Negative eWOM motivationTotal effect0.2320.689
Indirect effect0.0150.292
Direct effect0.0860.577
Online shopping platform environment → eWOM motivationTotal effect0.3150.732
Indirect effect0.0270.265
Direct effect0.1560.542
Table 9. Fitting Results of Modified Model 2.
Table 9. Fitting Results of Modified Model 2.
RMRRMSEAGFIRFICFIPGFI Χ 2 / df
Result0.0360.0000.930.920.9120.5221.216
Table 10. Path Coefficient of Model 2.
Table 10. Path Coefficient of Model 2.
Hypotheses and PathsLoad FactorStandard Errorp Value
H4: Negative eWOM motivation→ Immediate eWOM communication0.5530.022 * * *
H5: Negative eWOM motivation→ Ongoing eWOM communication0.4010.017 * * *
Note: * * * indicate p < 0.001.
Table 11. Regression results under immediate eWOM behavior.
Table 11. Regression results under immediate eWOM behavior.
InterdependentIndependent
VariableCoefficientp ValueVariableCoefficientp Value
Constant term0.14910.1101Constant term−0.09580.5071
X0.95190.0000X1.03420.0000
R20.8588R20.8392
F1198.3171F610.7641
Sig.F0.0000Sig.F0.0000
Table 12. Regression results under ongoing eWOM behavior.
Table 12. Regression results under ongoing eWOM behavior.
InterdependentIndependent
VariableCoefficientp ValueVariableCoefficientp Value
Constant term0.01190.9122Constant term−0.12640.3946
X1.00660.0000X1.04600.0000
R20.8340R20.8350
F989.6102F591.8913
Sig.F0.0000Sig.F0.0000
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, M. Causes and Behavioral Evolution of Negative Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication: Considering the Mediating Role of User Involvement and the Moderating Role of User Self-Construal. Sustainability 2023, 15, 660. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010660

AMA Style

He Y, Wu J, Wang M. Causes and Behavioral Evolution of Negative Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication: Considering the Mediating Role of User Involvement and the Moderating Role of User Self-Construal. Sustainability. 2023; 15(1):660. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010660

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Youshi, Jingyan Wu, and Min Wang. 2023. "Causes and Behavioral Evolution of Negative Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication: Considering the Mediating Role of User Involvement and the Moderating Role of User Self-Construal" Sustainability 15, no. 1: 660. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010660

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop