Next Article in Journal
Identification and Counting of Coffee Trees Based on Convolutional Neural Network Applied to RGB Images Obtained by RPA
Previous Article in Journal
The Consensus of Global Teaching Evaluation Systems under a Sustainable Development Perspective
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of Water Resource Allocation and Optimization Considering Reclaimed Water in a Typical Chinese City

Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics and Estuary, Hangzhou 310020, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(1), 819; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010819
Submission received: 24 November 2022 / Revised: 29 December 2022 / Accepted: 30 December 2022 / Published: 2 January 2023

Abstract

:
Reclaimed water is considered to be an important alternative to freshwater to solve the imbalance between the supply and demand of regional water resources; it is also recognized as an effective tool for alleviating ecological problems caused by insufficient water flow. Yiwu City is a typical area experiencing a water shortage in southeastern China because the regional water resources are limited. In this study, the multiple water resource allocations in Yiwu City are optimized, the complex coupling model of multiple water resource allocation is established, and both the economic and ecological effects of multiple water resource allocation in Yiwu City are simulated and analyzed. The simulation results of optimizing the multiple water resource allocations show an efficient way of reclaimed water utilization in this typical Chinese city. In order to ensure the future economic and social development of Yiwu City, it is necessary to introduce reclaimed water into different fields, such as residential water, industrial water, agricultural water, and environmental water. Reclaimed water has also proven to have a high capability for pollutant control and reduction, which is also important to the ecology and environmental protection.

1. Introduction

Recently, China has made great progress in the development and utilization of unconventional water sources, especially the recycling of tailwater from wastewater treatment plants [1,2,3]. The amount of unconventional water utilization in China has increased remarkably from 2000 to 2020, which plays an important role in alleviating the contradiction between water supply and demand, optimizing regional water resource allocation, and protecting the water environment [3,4,5,6,7]. However, the development and utilization of unconventional water is still critical in most Chinese cities due to the serious water shortage problem [5,8,9]. The proportion of reclaimed water utilization in the dual water supply system in China is less than 1.5%, which is relatively low compared to other countries, such as Japan, Israel, and Singapore [10,11,12]. In this study, the tailwaters of wastewater treatment plants are included in a complex system composed of water resource allocation, social and economic development, and the regional water environment. The optimal allocation of reclaimed water into different fields, such as residential water, industrial water, agricultural water, and environmental water are all considered in this study, while the nexus model is established by introducing both the ecological and social factors, as well as the financial factor. As an example, a multidimensional, synergetic, multisource allocation model is developed and utilized in a typical Chinese city.
Reclaimed water has been utilized in urban water resource allocation for decades; many countries have introduced reclaimed water in multisource water configuration systems, especially the United States, Japan, Israel, and Singapore. It is widely acknowledged that early in 1920, the government of Arizona (USA) developed urban wastewater recycling from the experimental research stage to the application stage [13,14,15,16]. In the 1960s, the United States built numbers of largescale wastewater treatment plants to treat and recycle domestic wastewater [17,18]. In 1992, the United States Environmental Protection Agency published guidance on dual water supply systems, including wastewater reuse, reclaimed water quality standards, dual water supplies, etc. [16,17,18,19]. The amount of wastewater recycling in California in 2000 reached 8.64 × 108 m3. The City of Los Angeles plans to use 69% of the total wastewater by the end of 2050, which is approximately 42% of the total water demand of the city [18,20]. As a legal and effective alternative to freshwater, reclaimed water has become an important part of the urban water supply system in the United States [19,20,21,22].
The difference in population densities in different areas of Japan results in serious water shortage problems in some cities with high populations. Therefore, Japan started researching wastewater recycling and reclaimed water utilization in 1955 [21,22]. During the 1970s, two-thirds of the total water used in the Seto Inland Sea was reclaimed water. In the 1980s, approximately 6.3 × 107 m3/d of Japan’s urban wastewater was used as a recycled resource. In 2020, Japan had built more than 2789 reclaimed water utilization facilities, which are mainly used for the treatment and reuse of urban wastewater and a dual water supply after treatment [21,22,23,24].
Israel also suffers from the problems of a water shortage since 70% of Israel’s mainland is desert. The extremely poor water resource in Israel has led to a distinctive reclaimed water usage system in the country [22,23,24,25,26]. During the 1960s, the management and utilization of reclaimed water in Israel became highly efficient. In most Israeli cities, the sewage discharge and water supply systems have been constructed completely; both engineering and non-engineering measures are utilized in order to save water resources [23,24,27]. In the late 1980s, there were 210 municipal wastewater recycling projects in Israel. Currently, almost 100% of domestic wastewater and 72% of municipal wastewater is treated and reused as a reclaimed water resource [27,28,29,30].
As a widely acknowledged alternative to freshwater to solve the imbalance problem between the supply and demand of regional water resources, reclaimed water is the key consideration of this study. A typical city experiencing a water shortage in China has been selected for this study. The allocation and optimization of water resources, taking into consideration reclaimed water, in this city has been executed and simulated in order to show the advantages of the newly derived multidimensional, synergetic, multisource allocation model. The social, economic, and environmental factors of water resource allocation and optimization are also investigated in detail.

2. Study Site

2.1. Characteristics of Yiwu City, China

Although the average annual precipitation of Yiwu City is 1418 mm, the high population density and economic factors of this city are still embarrassing, accounting for 1683 people per square kilometer and a total GDP of CNY 135 million, or USD 22.5 million, for the city. Hence, Yiwu City is widely known as a typical water shortage area in southeastern China; the local water resource per capita is only 20% of the Chinese national average. There are three types of water resources available in Yiwu City. First, Yiwu City has six medium-sized reservoirs and a project that diverts water from Dongyang City to Yiwu City. Together, the six medium-sized reservoirs have a total water storage capacity of 1.56 × 108 m3. As a high-quality water resource, it is mainly used for the domestic urban water supply, agricultural irrigation, etc. Indeed, the regional utilization rate of the water resource in Yiwu City is more than 40%, which is relatively high, while the amount of water diverted from Dongyang City to Yiwu City is more than 0.9 × 108 m3 per year, which is mostly used for the domestic urban water supply. Second, the average annual water resource of the Yiwu River and its tributaries is 1.27 × 109 m3, which is relatively high compared to the water resource of the six medium-sized reservoirs. When considering the water environment, the utilization of reclaimed water in Yiwu City shows advantages in the reduction of COD (chemical oxygen demand) and NH3-N (ammonia nitrogen) in the water of the Yiwu River, which is usually unsatisfactory due to the pollutants discharged from the urban area [1,3,10,29].
Figure 1 shows the dual water supplement and reclaimed water utilization in Yiwu City. The high-quality water resources in Yiwu City are lacking, and they are usually used for the drinking water system. As a good alternative, the tailwater of the wastewater treatment plant in Yiwu City is considered as another water resource, which equaled approximately 570,000 t/d at the end of 2018, while the water quality indicator of the tailwater is given as COD < 50 mg/L, NH3-N < 1.0 mg/L. Due to the low water quality of the tailwater from the wastewater treatment plant, the present utilization rate of the tailwater is only 11.24%, which leads to a low level of reclaimed water usage in industry and the agricultural fields of Yiwu City. Although the water quality of the tailwater is unsatisfactory, an additional treatment method is developed and executed in this study in order to improve the water quality and ensure water supply security. Nowadays, reclaimed water is a stable and reliable water resource in Yiwu City, and it can be used for the industrial and environmental water supplies. In the future, the increase in the population of Yiwu City will result in a huge amount of wastewater production as well as reclaimed water resources. Thus, reclaimed water will become a convincing water resource in the future in Yiwu City.

2.2. Dual Water Supply System and Reclaimed Water Utilization in Yiwu City

Due to the fact that the water supply system and multiple water resources are complex in Yiwu City, the water–economy–social nexus model established in this study considers the dual water supply system, the economic effects, and the ecological benefits for Yiwu City.
First, the nexus model is set up by generalizing the water supply projects and wastewater treatment plants. Generally, the social water cycle is considered as a main function in the present model. Second, the relationship between water suppliers and water consumers is fully considered in the present model. Third, the utilization of reclaimed water and the dual water supply system are classified and generalized by considering water quality demand. Finally, according to the demand for water quality, the multiple sources of the water resources in Yiwu City are classified as high-quality water, general water, and reclaimed water [10,25,29,30,31].
Among them, “high-quality water resource” refers to the water storage of the six reservoirs and the water diverted from Dongyang City, outside the local region of Yiwu City, which is mainly allocated for the domestic residents and agriculture, while the general water source refers to the Yiwu River and its tributaries, which is mostly allocated to industrial water, agricultural water, and ecological water. The reclaimed water source refers to the tailwaters of nine wastewater treatment plants in Yiwu City, and it is mostly allocated to the industrial and ecological water systems, depending on the different reclaimed water qualities from different wastewater treatment plants. Figure 2 shows the dual water supply system and the utilization of reclaimed water in Yiwu City.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Basic Equations

Based on the above analysis of the internal coupling mechanism and multidimensional, dynamic, synergetic relationship of water resource, economy, ecology, and environment, the utilization of reclaimed water is integrated into the dual water supply system and is fully considered as an independent water resource for the consumers [25,26,28]. The multidimensional, synergetic, multisource allocation model was then derived in this study by combining the effects in the field for society, the economy, and ecology. The basic equations of the present model are given as follow [21,22,23,24,25,26].
The basic objective function includes both the expected benefits and penalties of the water supply capacity, which are differentiated to obtain expected, comprehensive benefits under different allocation scenarios of the multiple water resources in Yiwu City. The penalties include the penalty of the low water assurance rate and unqualified water quality in specific sections of the river. The objective function of the model is given as [31,32,33]:
max F Q q = i = 1 N I [ Q i max Q i ] × B i i = 1 N I j = 1 N J [ Q E i j × C i j + f 1 ( q i j ) ]
where FQq is the expected comprehensive benefit of regional multisource water allocation (CNY or USD); Qimax is the maximum water supply capacity of the specific water source (m3); Qi is the configured water supply volume of the specific water source (m3), Bi is the net benefit coefficient of the specific water source (CNY/m3 or USD/m3); QEij is the water shortage cause by the predicted water resource allocation (m3), Cij is the penalty coefficient of the water shortage (CNY/m3 or USD/m3), Qij is the amount of water allocated to local water consumers (m3), and f1(qij) is the penalty coefficient considering the environmental capacity of the local river network (CNY/m3 or USD/m3).
The water resource assurance rate is defined as [6,33]:
ρ j ρ j *
while the environmental capacity of the local river network, which is also considered regarding the water quality at a specific section, is given as [6,9,28,29,30,31,32,33]:
i = 1 N I j = 1 N J f 1 ( q i j ) = { D × Δ W , W i j > W 0 0 , W i j < W 0
W i j = A × γ 2 + W F i j × γ 3
where ρj is the water supply assurance rate, D is the penalty coefficient for pollutant discharge beyond the capacity to accept pollutants (CNY/t or USD/t); ΔW is the discharged amount of pollutants beyond the environmental capacity (t), ΔW = WijW0, A is the rainwater collection area of the local river network (km2), WFij is the amount of wastewater discharge considering different consumers (t), γ2 is the discharge coefficient of the non-point source (t/m3), and γ3 is the discharge coefficient of the point source (t/m3).
The total amount of the local water resource, including reclaimed water, is also presented in the model, given as [33,34,35]:
Q i Q i max
Additionally, the constrained reservoir dispatching ability, the water supply capacity, and the non-negative constraint are also included in this model.

3.2. Simulation Parameters

According to the hydrological conditions in Yiwu City, 90% of the rainfall frequency is selected in this study for the model simulation and analysis. The simulated results for the environmental capacity of the Yiwu River in 2030 is 9427 T/a of COD and 283 T/a of NH3-N. Table 1 shows the emission indicators of the point source and the non-point source.
Table 2 and Table 3 show the value of the net benefit coefficient per cubic meter of water for various water resources and the value of the penalty coefficient for water shortages per cubic meter of water for different water consumers. It should be noted that the penalty for pollutants entering the river that exceed the environmental capacity is relatively high, namely CNY 22,800 /m3, or USD 3800/m3. Table 4 shows the parameters of the nexus model during the multiple water resources configuration.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Model Testing and Calibration

The model testing was executed by calculating the past water demand and forecasting the future water demand of Yiwu City. Table 5 shows the monthly distribution of water resources from all of the water sources, such as the six reservoirs, the water diversion project, the Yiwu River and its tributaries, and the reclaimed water from Yiwu City, with a consideration of 90% rainfall frequency. Table 6 shows the simulation results of water consumption for different fields of Yiwu City in both 2020 and 2030.
Figure 3 shows the results of annual water consumption and predicted water demand for both the past year of 2020 and the future year of 2030. The past data was collected from The Regional Statistical Yearbook and the prediction data was calculated by using the multidimensional, synergetic, multisource allocation model developed in this study.

4.2. Simulation Results

The immune particle swarm optimization algorithm (IPSO) is introduced in this study to solve the optimal allocation model of multiple water sources in Yiwu City based on the prediction for the water demand in 2030. However, as shown in Table 7, the simulation results of the basic allocation scheme of multiple water sources, considering a 90% insurance rate, have been proven to be unacceptable and unachievable due to the relatively high amount of total water demand. Therefore, both management and control methods are required in order to reduce the water demand in 2030. Hence, the reduction of water consumption in Yiwu City is anticipated in the future; the updated allocation of the water resources in 2030, considering the limitation of the insurance rate and environmental capacity is shown in Table 8, while the reclaimed water is also proven to be a necessary and precious resource for the water consumers in Yiwu City in 2030.
Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the optimal water resource allocation results for 2030. First, it should be noted that the restriction of the water supply in Yiwu City will be approximately 1.818 × 108 m3/a by the end of 2030 to ensure the water supply guarantee rate. Second, the utilization of reclaimed water will become versatile in the future; thus, the requirement of reclaimed water used in ecological flow will be reduce from 1.005 × 108 m3/a to 7.91 × 107 m3/a; the discrepancy of the reclaimed water used in ecological flow between the past year of 2020 and the future year of 2030 also confirms that reclaimed water will be used in the industrial and agricultural fields and will become an important part of the dual water supply system.

4.3. Analysis and Discussion

It can be concluded from the simulation results of the present multidimensional, synergetic, multisource allocation model that reclaimed water is a reliable and important water source for Yiwu City as an alternative to freshwater and gray water in the industrial, agricultural, and urban water supply, especially in the future year of 2030.
The discrepancies in water resource allocations between traditional predictions and the newly derived model for the year of 2030 are shown in Table 6 and Table 7, while the classification of different water resource comparisons between the traditional and novel models are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. The results predicted by traditional method have been obtained from the Statistical Yearbook of Yiwu City and the Regional Water Source Planning Report of Yiwu City. The social, economic, and environmental factors of water resource allocation and optimization are also investigated in detail.
The traditional method predicts that, together, the residential and environmental water resource will not meet the requirements in the year 2030, with a water shortage of 0.282 × 108 m3/a and 0.042 × 108 m3/a, respectively, eventually leading to a total water shortage of 0.324 × 108 m3/a in the year 2030 in Yiwu city, and it becomes embarrassing due to the fact that Yiwu city does not have enough freshwater resource to deal with the large amount of the water demand. However, when considering the reclaimed water as an effective alternative of the freshwater resource, with the new derived model in this study, the forecasting of the water allocation in all the fields of water consumers such as residents, industry, environment except irrigation. The new derived model indeed optimized the water resource in all the fields and results in a remaining water resource of 5.024 × 108 m3/a of Yiwu River and 0.620 × 108 m3/a of reclaimed water. Although the remaining water resource is slightly more than the prediction results from the traditional method, it is critical for Yiwu city to protect, sustain and preserve its society, economy and environment in the future.
Therefore, reclaimed water is proved an effective way to ensure the future economic and social development of Yiwu City. The incorporate of the reclaimed water into the allocation of multiple water resources is proved important and effective. The water supply capacity of the existing six reservoirs, which are recognized as supplying high-quality water, with a water supply capacity of 1.35 × 108 m3/a, while the water demand of Yiwu City was 1.346 × 108 m3/a in 2020; hence, a balance is achieved between the water demand and supply. However, the prediction result of high-quality water is only 2.246 × 108 m3/a in 2030, but the total demand of water resources in Yiwu City will reach 5.061 × 108 m3/a by the end of 2030, which is almost 2.25 times of the high-quality freshwater supply capacity. Due to the fact that Yiwu City is lacking water resources, the most effective way to improve the water supply insurance rate of this city is to incorporate reclaimed water into the multiple water resources allocation system.
Moreover, it is also indicated from the simulation results that if the reclaimed water is not included in the multiple water resources allocation system, the quantity of point source pollutants generated by water consumers in 2030 of Yiwu City will increase by 60% compared to the past year of 2020, leading to a serious water environment problem. When considering the reclaimed water utilization in Yiwu City, the amount of major pollutant discharges will be reduced by 50% compared to the past year of 2020, and the impact on the water environment will also be relieved. Therefore, both water security and water environmental protection can be achieved by introducing reclaimed water into the water supply system in Yiwu City.

5. Conclusions

A multidimensional, synergetic, multisource allocation model has been established for the water supply system in Yiwu City; the internal coupling mechanism and multidimensional, dynamic, synergetic relationship between water resources, economy, ecology and environment have been investigated. The effects of multiple water resource allocations on economics, society, and ecology are represented in the nexus model in both current and future stages.
Neither the high-quality water nor the normal water supply capacity in Yiwu City in 2030 is sufficient to meet the requirements of the calculated water demand. Therefore, reclaimed water has been introduced as a convincing alternative for minimizing the water shortage. The utilization of reclaimed water in both the urban and rural water supply systems are encouraged in the study area. The dual water price for the dual water supply system, including freshwater and reclaimed water, has been anticipated for the future to further accelerate the utilization of reclaimed water in Yiwu City.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.F. and S.W.; methodology, L.F. and J.W.; investigation, L.F. and S.W.; resources, H.P. and Z.G.; writing—original draft, L.F. and S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was jointly supported by the Applied Basic Public Research Program and Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LGF22E090007), the Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (No. 2022C03G1313221), the Technology Demonstration Project of Chinese Ministry of Water Resources (No. SF-202212), the Soft Science and Technology Plan Project of Zhejiang Province (No. 2022C35022), and the Research Program of the Department of Water Resources of Zhejiang Province (No. RB2107, RC2139, RA2102, ZIHE21Q003, ZIHE21Z002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available at www.yw.gov.cn.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tian, X.; Sarkis, J.; Geng, Y.; Qian, Y.Y.; Gao, C.X.; Bleischwitz, R.; Xu, Y. Evolution of China’s water footprint and virtual water trade: A global trade assessment. Environ. Int. 2018, 121, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, Q.; Wang, W.; Jiang, X.; Lu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J. Analysis of the potential of reclaimed water utilization in typical inland cities in northwest China via system dynamics. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 270, 110878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. NBSM. Bureau of Statistics; Ministry of Environmental Protection of China. In China Environmental Statistical Yearbook; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ao, D.; Chen, R.; Wang, X.C.; Liu, Y.; Dzakpasu, M.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Y.; Xue, T.; Wang, N. On the risks from sediment and overlying water by replenishing urban landscape ponds with reclaimed wastewater. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 236, 488–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, R.; Zimmerman, J. Hybrid analysis of blue water consumption and water scarcity implications at the global, national, and basin levels in an increasingly globalized world. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 5143–5153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhao, P.; Ma, M.; Hu, Y.; Wu, W.; Xiao, J. Comparison of international standards for irrigation with reclaimed water. Agr. Water Manag. 2022, 274, 107974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tuninetti, M.; Tamea, S.; Laio, F.; Ridolfi, L. To trade or not to trade: Link prediction in the virtual water network. Adv. Water Resour. 2017, 110, 528–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Deng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, H. Multi-omic studies on the toxicity variations in effluents from different units of reclaimed water treatment. Water Res. 2022, 208, 117874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sah, S.; Singh, R. Phylogenetical coherence of Pseudomonas in unexplored soils of Himalayan region. 3 Biotech. 2016, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zaibel, I.; Zilberg, D.; Groisman, L.; Arnon, S. Impact of treated wastewater reuse and floods on water quality and fish health within a water reservoir in an arid climate. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 559, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, X.; Du, H.B.; Zhang, Z.K.; Crittenden, J.C.; Lahr, M.L.; Moreno-Cruz, J.; Guan, D.; Mi, Z.F.; Zuo, J. Can virtual water trade save water resources? Water Res. 2019, 163, 114848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Leong, C.; Mukhtarov, F. Global IWRM ideas and local context: Studying narratives in rural Cambodia. Water 2018, 10, 1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Liao, Z.; Chen, Z.; Xu, A.O.; Gao, Q.; Song, K.; Liu, J.; Hu, H.Y. Wastewater treatment and reuse situations and influential factors in major Asian countries. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 282, 111976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, C.; Yuan, Z.X.; Liu, Y.Y.; Wu, Q.Y.; Sun, Y.X. Relative developmental toxicities of reclaimed water to zebrafish embryos and the relationship with relevant water quality parameters. Water Cycle 2021, 2, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lyu, S.; Chen, W.; Zhang, W.; Fan, Y.; Jiao, W. Wastewater reclamation and reuse in China: Opportunities and challenges. J. Environ. Sci. 2016, 39, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Masi, F.; Langergraber, G.; Santoni, M.; Istenic, D.; Atanasova, N.; Buttiglieri, G. Possibilities of nature-based and hybrid decentralized solutions for reclaimed water reuse. In Advances in Chemical Pollution, Environmental Management and Protection; Verlicchi, P., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 145–187. [Google Scholar]
  17. Santos, F.; Almeida, C.M.R.; Ribeiro, I.; Mucha, A.P. Potential of constructed wetland for the removal of antibiotics and antibiotic resistant bacteria from livestock wastewater. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 129, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Santos, F.; Almeida, C.M.R.d.; Ribeiro, I.; Ferreira, A.C.; Mucha, A.P. Removal of veterinary antibiotics in constructed wetland microcosms–response of bacterial communities. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 169, 894–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chen, Z.; Wu, G.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Q.; Shi, Q.; Ngo, H.H.; Vargas Saucedo, O.A.; Hu, H.Y. Water Eco-Nexus Cycle System (WaterEcoNet) as a key solution for water shortage and water environment problems in urban areas. Water Cycle 2020, 1, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pan, N.; Hou, Z.A.; Chen, W.P.; Jiao, W.T.; Peng, C.; Liu, W. Study on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass carbon in Greenland irrigated with reclaimed water. Huan Jing Ke Xue= Huanjing Kexue 2012, 33, 4081–4087. [Google Scholar]
  21. Perdigao, R.; Almeida, C.M.R.; Santos, F.; Carvalho, M.F.; Mucha, A.P. Optimization of an autochthonous bacterial consortium obtained from beach sediments for bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Water 2021, 13, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wencki, K.; Thone, V.; Ante, A.; Hogen, T.; Hohmann, C.; Tettenborn, F.; Pohl, D.; Preiss, P.; Jungfer, C. Approaches for the evaluation of future-oriented technologies and concepts in the field of water reuse and desalination. J. Water Reuse. Desalinat. 2020, 10, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ahmed, S.S.; Bali, R.; Khan, H.; Mohamed, H.I.; Sharma, S.K. Improved water resource management framework for water sustainability and security. Environ. Res. 2021, 201, 111527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Verstraete, W.; Van de Caveye, P.; Diamantis, V. Maximum use of resources present in domestic “used water”. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 5537–5545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bailey, E.S.; Casanova, L.M.; Simmons, O.D.; Sobsey, M.D. Tertiary treatment and dual disinfection to improve microbial quality of reclaimed water for potable and non-potable reuse: A case study of facilities in North Carolina. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 630, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhai, M.; Huang, G.; Liu, L.; Zhang, X. Ecological network analysis of an energy metabolism system based on input-output tables: Model development and case study for Guangdong. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 227, 434–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, C.; Anadon, L.D. A multi-regional input–output analysis of domestic virtual water trade and provincial water footprint in China. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 100, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Marks, J.S. Taking the public seriously: The case of potable and non potable reuse. Desalination 2006, 187, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dong, L.; Qi, Z.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Qi, Y.; Wu, H. Organics and nutrient removal from swine wastewater by constructed wetlands using ceramsite and magnetite as substrates. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 104739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Eljamal, R.; Eljamal, O.; Maamoun, I.; Yilmaz, G.; Sugihara, Y. Enhancing the characteristics and reactivity of nZVI: Polymers effect and mechanisms. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 315, 113714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Maamoun, I.; Eljamal, O.; Eljamal, R.; Falyouna, O.; Sugihara, Y. Promoting aqueous and transport characteristics of highly reactive nanoscale zero valent iron via different layered hydroxide coatings, Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 506, 145018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fernandes, J.P.; Almeida CM, R.; Pereira, A.C.; Ribeiro, I.L.; Reis, I.; Carvalho, P.; Mucha, A.P. Microbial community dynamics associated with veterinary antibiotics removal in constructed wetlands microcosms. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 182, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Flores, L.; García, J.; Pena, R.; Garfí, M. Constructed wetlands for winery wastewater treatment: A comparative Life Cycle Assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 659, 1567–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Galve, J.C.A.; Sundo, M.B.; Camus, D.R.D.; De Padua, V.M.N.; Morales, R.D.F. Series type vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands forDairy farm wastewater treatment. Civ. Eng. J. 2021, 7, 292–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Benson, B.C.; Rusch, K.A. Investigation of the light dynamics and their impact on algal growth rate in a hydraulically integrated serial turbidostat algal reactor (HISTAR). Aquacult. Eng. 2006, 35, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dual water supply system and reclaimed water utilization in Yiwu City.
Figure 1. Dual water supply system and reclaimed water utilization in Yiwu City.
Sustainability 15 00819 g001
Figure 2. Multiple water resources utilized in Yiwu City.
Figure 2. Multiple water resources utilized in Yiwu City.
Sustainability 15 00819 g002
Figure 3. Past and future water demand in Yiwu City.
Figure 3. Past and future water demand in Yiwu City.
Sustainability 15 00819 g003
Figure 4. Multiple water resources utilized in different fields: basic prediction.
Figure 4. Multiple water resources utilized in different fields: basic prediction.
Sustainability 15 00819 g004
Figure 5. Multiple water resources utilized in different fields: IPSO prediction.
Figure 5. Multiple water resources utilized in different fields: IPSO prediction.
Sustainability 15 00819 g005
Table 1. Emission of non-point and point sources in Yiwu City.
Table 1. Emission of non-point and point sources in Yiwu City.
IndicesNon-Point SourcePoint Source
IndicatorCODNH3-NCODNH3-N
Unitt/km2t/km2mg/Lmg/L
Total emission5.1990.29516.570.28
Table 2. Benefits of different water resources in Yiwu City.
Table 2. Benefits of different water resources in Yiwu City.
Water ResourcesBenefits (CNY/m3), (USD/m3)
High-Quality WaterGeneral WaterReclaimed Water
Value2280, (380)1140, (190)570, (95)
Table 3. Punishment for different water resource users in Yiwu City.
Table 3. Punishment for different water resource users in Yiwu City.
Water UsagePunishment (CNY/m3), (USD/m3)
ResidentsAgricultureIndustryEnvironmentOthers
Value22,800, (3800)11,400, (1900)11,400, (1900)5700, (950)5700, (950)
Table 4. Parameters of the nexus model.
Table 4. Parameters of the nexus model.
CategoryIndicatorValue
Reclaimed water in dual water supply system Industrial water
replace rate
57%
Urban public water
replace rate
40%
IPSO (immune particle swarm optimization algorithm) Irrigation100
Examples N100
Inertia weightInitial (1.2), Final (0.8)
Learning factor2
New particles M100
Randomized particles2
Threshold ξ 0.6
Table 5. The quantity of water resources in Yiwu City considering different sources.
Table 5. The quantity of water resources in Yiwu City considering different sources.
MonthMultisource Water Resources (108 m3)
Six ReservoirsWater Diversion ProjectYiwu River and Its TributariesReclaimed Water
10.0310.0750.4270.135
20.0530.0750.7220.118
30.1050.0751.4450.149
40.1090.0751.4890.141
50.1050.0751.4450.143
60.1740.0752.3880.142
70.0740.0751.0170.148
80.0380.0750.5160.142
90.0370.0750.5010.135
100.0230.0750.3100.131
110.0230.0750.3100.123
120.0230.0750.3100.134
In total0.7930.90010.881.641
Table 6. Past and future water demand in Yiwu City.
Table 6. Past and future water demand in Yiwu City.
MonthPast Water Demand (2020) (108 m3/a)Future Water Demand (2030) (108 m3/a)
IrrigationIndustryResidentsEnvironmentIrrigationIndustryResidentsEnvironment
10.0380.0390.0950.0380.0460.0610.1580.038
20.0380.0390.06700.0460.0610.1110
30.0380.0390.09000.0460.0610.1500
40.0380.0390.10300.0460.0610.1710
50.0380.0390.10800.0460.0610.1810
60.0450.0390.11700.0540.0610.1950
70.1230.0390.12100.1570.0610.2020
80.1780.0390.1410.2220.2280.0610.2360.222
90.1410.0390.1370.1700.1790.0610.2290.170
100.0450.0390.1230.1340.0540.0610.2040.134
110.0380.0390.1270.1100.0460.0610.2120.110
120.0380.0390.1170.1170.0460.0610.1960.117
In total0.7970.4661.3460.7910.9910.7342.2460.791
Table 7. Basic prediction of water resources considering reclaimed water in 2030 (108 m3).
Table 7. Basic prediction of water resources considering reclaimed water in 2030 (108 m3).
CategorySix ReservoirsWater Diversion ProjectYiwu River Reclaimed WaterIn TotalWater Shortage
Residential0.4600.90000.6042.246−0.282
Industrial0000.7320.7320
Irrigation000.99400.9940
Environmental000.2100.5360.746−0.042
In total0.4600.9001.2051.8724.974−0.324
Water resources remaining004.5950.827
Table 8. IPSO prediction of water resources considering reclaimed water in 2030 (108 m3).
Table 8. IPSO prediction of water resources considering reclaimed water in 2030 (108 m3).
CategorySix ReservoirsWater Diversion ProjectYiwu River Reclaimed WaterIn TotalWater Shortage
Residential0.4600.90000.4581.8180
Industrial0000.7320.7320
Irrigation000.99400.9940
Environmental000.2920.4990.7910
In total0.4600.9001.2861.6894.3350
Water resources remaining005.0240.620
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fu, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Peng, H.; Gui, Z. Study of Water Resource Allocation and Optimization Considering Reclaimed Water in a Typical Chinese City. Sustainability 2023, 15, 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010819

AMA Style

Fu L, Wang J, Wang S, Peng H, Gui Z. Study of Water Resource Allocation and Optimization Considering Reclaimed Water in a Typical Chinese City. Sustainability. 2023; 15(1):819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010819

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fu, Lei, Junmin Wang, Shiwu Wang, Hongxi Peng, and Zihan Gui. 2023. "Study of Water Resource Allocation and Optimization Considering Reclaimed Water in a Typical Chinese City" Sustainability 15, no. 1: 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010819

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop