1. Introduction
Among the biggest challenges in the 21st century are environmental issues. As an emerging market, Turkey needs to improve its environmental quality. In the literature, ways by which political risk affects the environment in Turkey have not been studied. To contribute to the issue, the impact of political stability on environmental quality in Turkey was studied. In the study, ways by which political stability, economic growth, renewable energy use, environmental regulation, and patents related to technology affect carbon emissions in the long term are explored by analyzing unique data for the case of Turkey. In addition, the literature on the subject is examined, and some recommendations are made according to the findings obtained within the scope of the study. In the study, NARDL and DOLS models are used to investigate the effect of political stability on environmental quality in Turkey.
Moreover, the present study answered the following questions: Does political stability affect environmental quality in Turkey in the long term? Does renewable energy consumption affect environmental quality in Turkey? Do environmental technology patents affect the environment in the long term? How does the growth of the economy in Turkey have an impact on the environment?
In a democratic process, the formation of an administrative structure that works effectively and efficiently in accordance with the rules of law is called political stability. The purpose of this definition is to see whether the decisions made by governments with respect to political, economic, and social issues are suitable for the characteristics of the society, meet the expectations of the society, and meet their needs. Political and institutional factors are as important as economic factors with respect to the success of the economies of countries at the macroeconomic level in the 21st century, and researchers have published many articles supporting this view in the literature. Political stability is important for countries to develop economically. A favorable political environment’s creation in the country is necessary for attracting foreign investors. However, having only a successful democratic regime, good governance, and a solid institutional structure is not enough to attract foreign investors. The sustainability of these features is another factor that should be considered in order to encourage foreign investors [
1].
The concept of sustainability, which is evaluated in terms of its environmental aspect, is divided into three sub-dimensions: economic, social, and environmental sub-dimensions. Countries have their own sustainable development goals and implement various policies in order to achieve these goals. Although sustainable development policies in Turkey have only just begun, they have been put into effect on a micro-based basis. It can be said that the period of political stability that Turkey went through during this period had a positive effect on investments in the aforementioned sustainable policies [
2].
Political stability defines a society and its ability to continue the path of development. It guides economic activities by making long-term predictions for decision makers who want to invest and making predictions in certain environments. Political stability is effective with respect to the environment, and it ensures the transfer of resources to future generations and their effective use. Political stability and environmental sustainability constantly influence each other. For the continuation of environmental sustainability, economic growth and ecological balance should be in harmony, and appropriate sustainable development policies should be prepared by taking the environmental factor into consideration when planning [
3].
People have met the basic needs they need for their lives by making use of the ecosystem. The low population in the beginning allowed people to continue their lives by acting in harmony with nature without harming the environment. The place of the ecosystem in our lives is indispensable for the continuation of the life cycle, for meeting the needs of people, for their existence, and for the cycle of climate and natural events. As a result of the increasing population relative to industrialization, the raw material and energy needs of people have also increased, resulting in the increased use of raw materials and fossil resources in order to meet needs. The deterioration of the ecosystem by humans and the fact that nature is not allowed to renew itself negatively affected the environment and caused it to become polluted. Some of these effects are the increase in air temperatures, drought, decrease in precipitation, destruction of forests, increase in fires due to extreme heat, inability to obtain the desired efficiency in production, and the extinction of living things in the seas [
4].
Rapidly increasing populations, energy needs, and industrialization have caused a decrease in raw materials and fossil resources due to increased use and the deterioration of the ecological balance. While using resources, the need for planning has emerged with respect to considering future generations. In order to reduce environmental pollution and waste, the use of nonrenewable energy sources should be reduced, and the use of renewable energy resources should be replaced; moreover, the country should be guided by producing policies in line with this direction. Planning that includes the environment in sustainable development plans can reduce environmental pollution so that nature is given the opportunity to renew itself due to the implementation of sustainable environmental policies. The ecological balance should be given importance in ensuring sustainable development, and the environment should be used effectively and efficiently in achieving the goals determined by economic growth; moreover, renewable energy should be preferred. Making investments that encourage the use of renewable energy resources in Turkey can increase the environmental quality [
2].
Until the 1970s, states unconsciously consumed natural resources by thinking that they were unlimited and acted by focusing only on growth, damaging the environment. Studies focused on economic growth have caused an increase in environmental pollution and it has been understood that this situation is not sustainable. During the 1980s, it was understood that resources were not unlimited, and sustainable development models were created by including the environment in economic development plans. In addition, planning for environmental policies has been carried out with future generations in mind [
5].
It is commonly reported in journalism that a government cannot survive because of political instability. In this view, uncertainty plays an important role. For the country to be considered unstable, a government does not have to fall. The government only needs to be seriously threatened by political tensions. It is possible to make this view functional, but it cannot be applied to real-world situations and is, therefore, only useful for anecdotal examples. For a government to remain stable, it must fulfill its stated duties and remain in power [
6]. Clearly, governments that change frequently and have different preferences (often at odds) produce inconsistent policy outcomes. Moreover, the rapid turnaround indicates that the government cannot rely on sufficient political support. Political instability and economic growth are rarely examined empirically due to a lack of data. Nevertheless, some economists are interested in this relationship. According to Kuznets [
7], much economic growth should not be expected due to unforeseen changes in the conditions of political turmoil.
Studies on environmental pollution have begun to pay attention to institutional factors recently. There can be direct and indirect effects on environmental quality from policies and regulations. To assess institutional quality, various proxies are used. In terms of governance structures that work effectively and efficiently, political stability, corruption control, and the rule of law are the most important indicators [
8]. Studies investigating the impact on environmental quality have mostly focused on corruption and the rule of law as indicators of institutional quality [
9]. Reduced carbon emissions are achieved via the formulation and regulation of environmental policies. In order to formulate and implement environmental policies, an impartial institutional system is crucial. It is crucial that a strong and stable government is in place in a country free of corruption in order to develop an effective environmental strategy and implement it. Nonetheless, if institutions are weak and there are flaws, firms will take advantage of pollution control protocols to maximize profits [
10]. Additionally, the spatial institutional spillover effect is one way powerful institutions can reduce pollution domestically and spread the effect to neighboring countries. [
11]. As economic growth proceeds, institutions that are impartial and effective contribute to reducing environmental pollution [
12]. Environmental policies and green technologies cannot be formulated and regulated effectively due to weak institutions [
13]. A country’s ability to control environmental pollution depends on strong institutions. During the study’s period from 2000 to 2016, political stability, corruption control, and the rule of law were compared to determine their effects on CO
2 emissions. It was observed that the rule of law, political stability, and corruption control all play a significant role in reducing carbon emissions and improving the environment. Observations indicate a decline in CO
2 emissions when political stability is compared to the rule of law [
14]. Developing, regulating, and applying environmental laws without compromise are crucial to reducing CO
2 emissions. A major threat of the 21st century is climate change caused by carbon emissions and global warming [
15]. To avoid the significant impacts of global warming and to limit the temperature increase by 2 degrees Celsius over the century, 196 countries signed the Paris Agreement on Climate Change in 2015 [
16]. Environmental pollution policies such as the Paris Agreement and other related policies are largely determined by the quality of institutions [
17].
Chowdhury et al. [
18] conducted a study on the effects of foreign direct investments and other variables on the ecological footprint of 92 countries between 2001 and 2016. As a result of the research, the researchers, who observed that export and institutional quality reduce the ecological footprint, concluded that direct investment has a negative effect on the ecological footprint. The ecological footprints of BRICS countries between 1995 and 2016 were examined by Kongbuamai et al. [
19], and they examined economic growth, renewable energy consumption, nonrenewable energy consumption, industrialization, and the consistency of environmental policy. Based on their research, they concluded that economic growth, energy consumption from renewable and nonrenewable sources, and industrial activities have a direct and positive effect on the ecological footprint; however, consistency in environmental policies adversely impacts it. As a result, they concluded that BRICS countries should focus on preventive environmental policies in order to be successful in the field of environmental sustainability.
3. Data and Methodology
The present study investigates the effect of political stability on environmental quality, taking into account the critical role of economic growth, patents in environmental technologies, environmental regulation, and renewable energy consumption in Turkey from 1990 to 2019. The estimated model of the present study is shown below:
Equation (1) highlights that CO
2 emissions are determined by a combination of variables such as LPATENT, LPRI, LGDP, ER, and LREC. This model is converted into their regression form for empirical analysis as follows:
where LCO
2, LPATENT, LPRI, LREC, LGDP, and ER stand for production-based CO
2 emissions, patents on environmental technologies, political risk index, renewable energy consumption, gross domestic product, and environmental regulation, respectively. The Regulation on Environmental Impact Assessment came into force on 25 November 2014 while the Regulation on Environmental Permits and Licenses came into force on 10 September 2014. Therefore, the present study used a dummy variable to capture the effect of environmental regulations on environmental sustainability in Turkey, as advised by [
57,
58,
59]. The present study used NARDL and DOLS models to investigate political stability on environmental quality in Turkey. To examine long-term equilibrium interactions between independent and dependent variables, the paper employs NARDL methods. NARDL approaches can address heteroscedasticity, serial correlation problems, and time series data in contrast to conventional ARDL methodologies. Moreover, although variables are integrated, the NARDL approach still applies. Finally, to obtain the nonlinear effect of LPATENT, LPRI, LREC, ER, and LGDP on LCO
2 in Turkey, the present study employed the NARDL approach. Thus, the final expression of Equation (2), after considering the positive and negative shock of regressors using the NARDL model, is reported in Equation (3) as follows:
In this study, the DOLS estimator is used as a robust test for the outcomes of NARDL. The DOLS eliminates serial correlation and endogeneity problems by using a parametric procedure.
Figure 1 and
Table 1 illustrate the analysis flowchart and descriptive statistics of time series variables. As a result of the analysis of the data within the scope of the study, the graphs of political stability, economic growth, environmental technology patents, renewable energy consumption, and carbon emissions by year are presented in
Figure 2. According to the pattern of the carbon emissions graph, although it decreased in some years, it generally continued until 2017 in an increasing manner and started to decline since that date. When we examine the political stability trend of Turkey with the data between research dates, as observed in the graphic above, it was determined that the stability in the country, which was governed by coalition governments in 1990–1991, was at a bad level and far below expectations. It has been determined that political stability increased in 1993 and decreased from 1994 to 1999, so it reached the worst level in research history in 1999. The transition to single-party rule in 2002 brought stability. It increased steadily until 2005, and stability was achieved via economic growth. It was determined that political stability reached the highest level in 2005 among the research dates. However, it was concluded that political stability went down in general with the effect of the world economic crisis between 2008 and 2012. In 2013, 8.5% growth was achieved in the country, and stability increased. However, in the following years, it was concluded that there was a slight decrease in the level of stability due to the political and economic developments in the country and in the world.
4. Empirical Findings
The present study investigates the effect of political stability on environmental quality, taking into account the critical role of economic growth, patents in environmental technologies, and renewable energy consumption in Turkey from 1990 to 2019. Based on this aim, as an initial test, the BDS test was conducted to decide which estimate should be used to capture the aim of the study. By applying the unit root test, whether the data were stationary or not was examined. Since the nonlinear model is likely to give more accurate results, the nonlinear model has been used in the present study. Nonlinear ARDL long-run form values were calculated to determine the positive or negative effects of the effect. Finally, DOLS techniques were used as a robust estimator to support the outcomes of the NARDL test for the estimated model.
In
Table 2, which test model would be used for performing the BDS test is decided. The test was applied for all variables. Results that are less than 0.01 indicate that each of our variables is independent, as reported in
Table 2. For this reason, the nonlinear model was used in the study since the use of the nonlinear model is likely to provide more consistent results.
After the nonlinear model was determined, whether the data were stationary was evaluated by applying the unit root test, and it was observed that since all data were less than 0.01, it was not necessary to use the second difference because the first difference was stationary. This indicates that the time series variables exhibit an I(1) behavior, as shown in
Table 3.
In this study, the new-generation nonlinear ARDL bound test model was used. The long-term impact of our independents, namely political stability, patents on environmental technologies, renewable energy consumption, and economic growth, on the environment is explored. The NARDL bound estimator reveals that time series variables have a long-term effect according to the reliability numbers of 10%, 5%, 2.5%, and 1%, as reported in
Table 4, but whether the effects are negative or positive on an individual basis has not been determined. Therefore, the NARDL test is applied, and the outcomes of the test are reported in
Table 5.
The nonlinear model is used in
Table 5, and the results show how each independent variable affects the environment in the long run. Since the probability of patents is higher than 0.05, its negative and positive effects on the environment do not matter. However, the coefficient is negative, indicating that investment in environmental technology improves the environment or limits environmental degradation. This outcome can support the outcomes reported by Cheng et al. [
55] and Shahbaz et al. [
56], which underlined that technological innovations reduced CO
2 levels.
Table 5 also reports that the positive shocks of political stability affect environmental degradation. Turkey’s political stability reduces carbon emissions. In other words, as political stability in the country increases, environmental sustainability and environmental quality also increase according to the estimated results. Purcel [
23] examined the relationship between political stability and carbon emission in low–middle-income countries, and Sohail et al. [
28] also conducted a similar study for the case of Pakistan and concluded that political stability reduces carbon emissions by making a positive contribution to the environment in the long term. As shown in
Table 5, the
p-values of the economic growth coefficient are below 5% and positive. Positive economic growth increases environmental degradation. In other words, as the economy grows, environmental degradation increases and environmental sustainability decreases. The findings of Solarin et al. [
38], support our empirical results since Solarin et al. [
38] concluded that in Nigeria, economic growth will pollute the environment in the short term and have a positive effect on environmental quality in the long term.
The fact that renewable energy makes up less than 5% and is determined as negative indicates that it makes a positive contribution to the environment. Doğan and Şeker [
45] support the findings of our research since they found similar findings for countries using the most amount of renewable energy in the world. As a result, when the data were examined, findings were obtained. While political stability and renewable energy contribute positively to environmental sustainability, the environment is polluted in Turkey as economic growth increases. In addition, it has been determined that patents on environmental technologies do not have a significant effect on environmental pollution
As supportive evidence, the present study used the DOLS approach (
Table 6). The main findings of DOLS are as follows: Political stability, renewable energy, and environmental technology patents contribute to environmental sustainability and are environmentally friendly. However, as the economy grows, the environment in Turkey deteriorates. At a 5% significance level, environmental regulations do not significantly affect environmental sustainability in Turkey.
5. Conclusions
As a result of the increasing population relative to industrialization, the raw material and energy needs of people have also increased, causing an increased use of raw materials and fossil fuels in order to meet the needs and deterioration of the ecological balance. The deterioration of the ecosystem and the failure of nature to renew itself adversely affected the environment and caused it to become polluted. In ensuring sustainable development, the three main components of sustainability, which are environmental protection, economic growth, and social dimension, work in harmony, increasing the potential to meet people’s wishes and needs. Institutions play a role in the implementation of environmental policies via policies and regulations. In order to reduce environmental pollution and waste, the use of nonrenewable energy sources should be reduced, and the use of renewable energy sources should be preferred. In the case of investments in technology, the increase in domestic innovations with developments in the future can reduce CO2 emissions. Compliance with sustainable environmental policies while making development plans can facilitate the establishment of an ecological balance, and nature can be given the opportunity to renew itself.
There are problems with environmental issues in Turkey. In order to identify these and improve the quality of the environment, how political risks affect the environment in Turkey was investigated. In order to contribute to the solution, the impact of political stability on the quality of the environment in Turkey was identified. This empirical study has contributed to the literature because it is the first study conducted within the context of Turkey, and four different variables have been used together. In the study, the long-term effects of political stability, economic growth, patents on environmental technologies, and renewable energy use on the environment were examined. The evaluation was carried out by making use of unique data for the case of Turkey. NARDL and DOLS models were used in the study. How each independent variable affects the environment in the long run was evaluated. The outcome of the present study reveals that there was no negative or positive effect of patents on the environment. However, investment in environmental technology improves the environment or limits environmental degradation. Political stability affects environmental degradation. Turkey’s political stability reduces carbon emissions, and as political stability increases, environmental sustainability and environmental quality are expected to increase. Economic growth increases environmental degradation. In other words, as the economy grows, environmental degradation increases and environmental sustainability decreases. The use of renewable energy provides a positive contribution to the environment by reducing carbon emissions.
As a result, it is expected that political stability and renewable energy consumption in Turkey will contribute positively to environmental sustainability in the long run, and that the environment will be polluted in the case of increased economic growth. In addition, patents will not have a significant effect on environmental pollution. Political stability, renewable energy, and environmental technology patents will contribute to environmental sustainability in an environmentally friendly manner, but the growth of the economy causes environmental degradation in Turkey. Based on these findings, the following policy recommendations were made. In order to ensure the continuity of Turkey’s environmental sustainability, investigating renewable energy sources and determining those that can be applied in the country are recommended. Research can be carried out within the scope of international rules that should be followed in order to protect the environment while ensuring economic growth and determining the legal regulations needed. If we want a healthy, livable world and sustainable environment for future generations, starting from educational institutions, environmental awareness should be imparted upon young people by providing training by expert personnel in order to create environmental awareness. R & D studies for environmental technologies should be supported, and increasing the institutional quality of a country should be ensured by coordinating with public-non-governmental organizations with the aim of increasing environmental quality.