Next Article in Journal
Fiscal Policy, Oil Price, Foreign Direct Investment, and Renewable Energy—A Path to Sustainable Development in South Africa
Previous Article in Journal
The Potential of Gamification for Social Sustainability: Meaning and Purposes in Agri-Food Industry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nitrogen Fertilization Causes Changes in Agricultural Characteristics and Gas Emissions in Rice Field
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Using Chromosomal Abnormalities and Germination Traits for the Assessment of Tritipyrum Amphiploid Lines under Seed-Aging and Germination Priming Treatments

1
Department of Plant Production and Genetics, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz 7144165186, Iran
2
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Engineering, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz 7144165186, Iran
3
Department of Field Crops, School of Agriculture, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van 65090, Turkey
4
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van 65090, Turkey
5
Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, Coppito, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(12), 9505; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129505
Submission received: 21 February 2023 / Revised: 9 June 2023 / Accepted: 12 June 2023 / Published: 13 June 2023

Abstract

:
Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum (PTCT) amphiploid is a new cereal grown in saline soil and brackish water for grain and forage production. We evaluated the tolerance to seed deterioration in 13 promising PTCT lines, assessing accelerated aging (AA) tests by using AA boxes with 100% relative humidity at 40 °C for 72 h. The (Ma/b)(Cr/b)F4 and (St/b)(Cr/b)F4) PTCT lines, more sensitive to seed aging, were primed with NaCl, Salicylic Acid (SA), and Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) to increase the seed vigor of artificially aged seeds. Germination and emergence traits, biochemical parameters, and chromosomal abnormalities induced by artificial aging were measured in deteriorated and not-deteriorated seeds. The highest reduction percentages related to seed vigor were observed in (Ka/b)(Cr/b)F2 (34.52) and La(4B,4D)/b (28.15) lines, while the lowest was found in (Ma/b)(Cr/b)F4 (7.65) and (St/b)(Cr/b)F4 (7.46) lines. Seed aging also increases electrolytes, potassium, and protein leakages. Chromosomal abnormalities are caused by seed aging that interferes with chromosome behaviors during cell division. Seed priming on aged seeds revealed an increase in the germination percentage (GP) with PEG treatment, while the priming by SA showed an increase in seedling traits, such as the seedling length (SL2). In conclusion, we highlighted the potential use of different PTCT lines and the effective use of seed priming on deteriorated seed to enhance seed viability and seedling vigor as a useful tool for sustainable agriculture.

1. Introduction

The development and selection of new amphiploid lines of cereals are crucial to identify the most performing ones in terms of crop production and survival in harsh environmental conditions [1,2]. Nowadays, one of the main factors reducing plant productivity is the poor seedling establishment in dry and semi-arid areas due to different abiotic stresses, such as rare annual precipitation, high evaporation, water scarcity, and soil salinity [3,4]. Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum (PTCT) lines, derived from the natural hybridization of Triticum aestivum L. and Thinopyrum bessarabicum, are recombinant chromosomal lines of hexaploid Tritipyrum, a new salt-tolerant species of cereal [5,6]. It was demonstrated that Tritipyrum lines could tolerate a salt concentration of about 250 mmol NaCl [7,8]. Thus, these novel amphiploid lines provide a new opportunity for producing grain and forage in saline soils and brackish waters in arid and semi-arid areas.
The first step toward reaching high production yields is the effective establishment of a crop. Seed germination dynamics play a crucial role in this process [9]. The uniformity of development, yield, and quality of the harvested products are all greatly influenced by the quality of the seeds and how they are stored [10]. The seed’s nature and its physical, morphological, and nutrient storage conditions are crucial to enable the proper seedling establishment and the least amount of mechanical and biological losses [11,12]. Understanding the intricate factors affecting seed longevity is extremely important from an ecological, agronomical, and economic perspective [13]. It is recognized that the aging rate of the seeds is strongly influenced by environmental and genetic factors, such as storage temperature, seed moisture content, and seed quality [14]. These factors could affect all the seed properties that determine the successful plant establishment. Seed vigor is the sum of the seed properties which determine the potential for high germination abilities, rapid, uniform emergence, and development of normal seedlings under a wide range of field conditions, as defined by the Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA) [15,16].
The uniformity of emergence and seedling establishment, with consequently farmers’ income, could be reduced by seed deterioration. Almost every year, 25% of the harvested seeds lose their quality due to deterioration [17]. Seed deterioration may occur as a natural phenomenon, starting with a chain of biochemical events, such as membrane damage and disruption of biochemical processes [18]. Thereby, most of the vital properties of seeds are diminished, starting with a decline in germination and emergence [19], leading to poor seedling establishment [20]. During seed deterioration, chromosomal aberration and permanent chemical and structural changes occur at the cellular level that leads to a decreased viability of seeds [21].
In natural conditions, seed deterioration induces decreased germination percentages, poor seedling production, lowered vigor, declined viability, and seed death [22]. Furthermore, deteriorated seeds have a more non-uniform establishment than healthy seeds [23]. These issues lead to low seedling emergence, and few plants per hectare occur in the form of spots in the field [23]. The viability of damaged seeds can be influenced by a decrease in total carbohydrates and an increase in lipid peroxidation during storage [24]. Seed quality and viability decrease are further triggered by adverse environmental conditions, leading to a decay rate variation among varieties of the same species [10,25,26]. Under high salt concentrations, for example, seed decay induces chromosome abnormalities during cell division (e.g., chromosome stickiness, laggard chromosome, disturbed and irregular anaphase, and anaphase bridge formation) [27,28]. Katabale and colleagues [29] observed high rates of chromosomal abnormalities after exposing onion (Allium cepa L.) seedlings to aqueous extracts of neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf. Another study by Pavlova [30] evaluated nickel’s toxic effects on root-meristem cell division in the seedlings of Plantago lanceolata L., observing anaphase bridges, chromosome adhesion, retardation, and extrusion of nuclear material into the cytoplasm of these cells. The percentage of chromosome alterations usually increases in a concentration and time-dependent manner.
Seed storability is one of the key factors that assure plant propagation and crop production [31]. This important characteristic has not been described for PTCT lines developed in our previous work [11]. Currently, conventional methods to evaluate seed storability include seed vigor accelerated aging (AA), followed by germination and seedling growth tests [31,32]. Additionally, after AA, deterioration tests and electrical conductivity (EC), pH level, and cellular leakage of solutes during seeds’ water uptake can be measured [33]. Biochemical processes augment cell membrane permeability in seeds during storage. As a result, some cellular solutes (sugars, amino acids, fatty acids, proteins, enzymes, and inorganic ions like K+, Ca+2, Mg+2, Na+, and Mn+2) are released to the external environment during water uptake for germination [31]. The amount of solute leakage can be used as an indicator for screening the storability of cultivars [34]. The frequencies of chromosomal abnormalities arising from chromosomal fusions formed through errors in re-joining DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by the cell’s recombination pathways can occur in AA tests [35].
One of the strategies used to improve plant growth in semi-arid and salinity-affected environments is the priming of seeds. Many works highlighted the use of seed priming to increase germination rate and crop development uniformity for overcoming poor germination and erratic crop stand [36]. This treatment is provided before planting, in the early germination stage, when water is absorbed but prevents roots from coming out. In this process, seeds are soaked in water or various osmotic solutions and then dried until the initial moisture is achieved [37]. Some biochemical processes are required during priming to initiate germination (e.g., water absorption, hydrolysis or metabolism of inhibitory materials, and enzymatic activities) [38]. The induced effects remain even after redrying the seeds. Materials of high molecular weights are usually used for priming. Polyethylene glycol (PEG6000-8000) is the most used for seed priming. PEG is a non-toxic substance with a high molecular weight, osmotic pressure, and water solubility, which does not penetrate plant tissues while serving as a suitable compound for inducing drought stress [39,40]. Salicylic Acid (SA) is a phenolic growth-regulating compound that is present in low quantities (mg of fresh weight or less) in growing plants and applied for seed priming [41]. It was demonstrated that rice seed priming by SA increases seed vitality [42]. Salts are frequently utilized for seed priming [43,44]. Pretreatment with mineral salts (halo-priming) is an easy, low-cost, and low-risk technique effective in seed priming for plantations under salinity stress conditions [45]. Priming is a simple, low-cost, low-risk approach to increase the vigor of deteriorated seeds.
The storage-tolerant lines development is one of the key characteristics of the ongoing plant breeding program. However, this method of introducing current lines has been little investigated. In this work, we hypothesized that 13 germplasms of Tritipyrum could be valid tolerant storage lines.
To test this hypothesis, we analyzed 13 germplasms of Tritipyrum to determine seed vigor by assessing germination and emergence traits, cell leakage, and cytogenetic abnormalities. Three different seed priming treatments were performed on the artificially aged seeds, and germination and emergence traits were measured to evaluate the potential increase in germination vitality of aged seeds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

In this study, 13 PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines (Tritipyrum, 2n = 6x = 42, AABBEbEb) were provided by the Department of Crop Production and Plant Genetics, School of Agriculture, Shiraz, Iran and transferred to the laboratory to evaluate their viabilities. The Tritipyrum lines used were La/b (1), (Ka/b)(Cr/b)F5 (2), (Ka/b)(Cr/b)F2 (3), La(4B,4D)/b (4), Ka/b (5), St/b (6), (Ma/b)(Cr/b)F3 (7), (Ma/b)(Cr/b)F4 (8), (St/b)(Cr/b)F4 (9), Cr/b (10), Az/b (11), (Ka/b)(Cr/b)F3 (12), (Ka/b)(Cr/b)F6 (13), and kavir (14) as a control. Then, the homogeneous and uniform seeds were selected and stored in plastic bags with minimum permeability at 5 °C.

2.2. Accelerated Aging (AA) Analysis

The experiments were carried out in a completely randomized factorial design with three replications at the laboratory and greenhouse of the College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Seeds were placed in mesh bags on a sieve suspended above water inside a plastic Accelerated Aging (AA) box [28]. The box was kept in the incubator with 100% relative humidity at 40 °C for 72 h [46]. After this aging period, four replicates of 25 seeds for each treatment were analyzed for seed germination and emergence as described. The mean average seedling percentage for each batch was calculated ten days after sowing based on an evaluation of seedling development. Seed moisture content (oven-drying method at 105 °C/24 h) was also measured before and after the aging period to assess the accuracy of the AA results. For cytogenetic studies, the seeds were subjected to AA stress adjusted in a desiccator with 100% humidity in Petri dishes above wire meshes, sealed, and maintained at 5 °C (T1), 40 °C (T2), 50 °C (T3), 60 °C (T4), and 70 °C (T5) for 24 h. In the control treatments (T1), the seeds were kept in a cold chamber at 5 °C. After applying each heat treatment, a cytogenetic analysis of artificially aged seeds was performed.

2.2.1. Germination Test

Three replicates of 25 seeds were analyzed in 90-mm glass Petri dishes on 1-layered filter paper (No. 1) at 25 °C. Each plate received 10 mL of deionized water, enough to cover each seed by roughly half its content [47].

2.2.2. Emergence Test

The emergence test was conducted in a greenhouse with four replicates of 25 seeds. Each germplasm was hand-sowed on trays of sand at a depth of 20 mm in 1-m-long furrows in 60-mm-spaced rows. The emerged seedlings were counted daily. Evaluation of seedling development was performed ten days after starting the tests. Emergence tests were carried out at the deterioration levels of deteriorated seeds and not-aged seeds of the different Tritipyrum lines for ten days. Tritipyrum lines, a new salt-tolerant cereal, are derived from the natural hybridization of Triticum aestivum L. and Thinopyrum bessarabicum [5,6].

2.3. Plant Traits

2.3.1. Germination Percentage (GP)

Germination Percentage (GP) was calculated through the following formula:
G P = N n 100
where N is the number of germinated seeds, and n is the number of experimental seeds.

2.3.2. Germination Rate (GR)

Germination count was performed daily at the same time, and Germination Rate (GR) was calculated by using the following equations [48]:
G R = 1 / M G T
M G T = n i d i / N
where ni shows the number of seeds germinated per day, di represents the incubation period, and N denotes the total number of seeds germinated in each treatment.

2.3.3. Shoot Length (SL) and Root Length (RL)

Shoot Length (SL) and Root Length (RL) was measured with a ruler with 1-mm accuracy, and then, their average lengths were recorded for each treatment in each repetition [46].

2.3.4. Seedling Length Vigor Index (SLVI)

Seedling Length Vigor Index (SLVI) was calculated via the following equation [49]:
S L V I = R L + S L G P 100
where RL, SL, and GP stand for root length (cm), shoot length (cm), and germination percentage, respectively. Length measurements were performed by considering the total seedling in each treatment and replication.

2.3.5. Shoot Dry Weight (SDW) and Root Dry Weight (RDW)

Shoot and root were separated to measure their dry weights. They were heated in an air-heated oven at 105 °C for 30 min, dried in the oven at 70 °C for 24 h, and then determined their dry weights with an accuracy of 0.0001 g.

2.3.6. Tolerance Index (TI)

We also calculated the Tolerance Index (TI) through the following equation [50]:
T I = M e a n   t r a i t s   a f t e r   A A M e a n   t r a i t s   b e f o r e   A A 100

2.3.7. Reduction Percentage (RP)

Reduction Percentage (RP) was calculated for GP, GR, GE, SDW, RDW, SVI, EP, and ER by applying the following formula:
R P = 1 N x M c   100
where Nx and Mc are the amounts of germination and emergence traits after and before seed aging (aged and not-aged seeds) since the measurement units of germination traits were different, the declining changes in each trait were first calculated and converted into percentages after applying artificial seed aging. Then, their means were determined for each cultivar.

2.4. Biochemical Parameters

2.4.1. Electrical Conductivity (EC)

Electrolyte leakage was measured based on the leakage of solutes from the cell membranes of all the seeds in deionized distilled water. Fifty undamaged seed samples per lot were weighed on an analytical balance (0.01 g) and soaked in 25 mL of distilled water at 25 ± 1 °C for 24 h [51]. Then, the Electrical Conductivities (ECs) of the leachates were measured with a conductivity meter (K220 Consort, DDS-11A model, Nanjing T-bota Scietech Instruments & Equipment Co., Ltd. (TBT), Nanjing, China).

2.4.2. Potassium Leakage

Fifty undamaged seed samples per lot were weighed on an analytical balance (0.01 g) in 4 replicates and then soaked in 75 mL of distilled water at 25 ± 1 °C. Then, they were placed in disposable plastic cups and kept in a germinator at 25 °C. After 48 h (imbibition period), leached potassium was determined with a flame photometer adjusted to 50 g K+ mL−1 and reading 50 [52]. The results were expressed in g K+ g−1 seeds.

2.5. Cytogenetic Analysis

Cytogenetic analysis was carried out through the root-tip smear method [53,54]. Root cell chromosomes of plants are suitably utilized for research purposes like studying chromosomal abnormalities due to their ease of access, large size, small number in each batch, and detectable characteristics [55]. Twenty-five seeds with three replicates in each treatment were used in the germination test. Seed germination rates varied due to the different temperatures applied in each treatment. Once the radicles were 1–2 cm long, the root tips containing meristem tissues were collected after keeping them in Lewitsky’s fixative solution for 16 h. Then, the samples were hydrolyzed (1N HCl was maintained at 60 °C for 10 min), washed in distilled water, and stained with 2% acetic orcein using the squashing method [56]. The slides were observed through a light microscope (Zeiss, Axiolab 5, Jena, Germany), and the best chromosomal plates were captured at 100× magnification using an Axiocam 208 color camera (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Five hundred cells per treatment (100 cells with five replicates) were counted and analyzed. Mitotic Index (MI) was calculated by dividing the total number of cells under division by the total number of cells analyzed multiplied by 100.

2.6. Seed Priming

The seeds of PTCT lines, including (Ka/b)(Cr/b)F2 and La(4B/4D)/b that resulted in the more sensitive to seed aging, were primed at four levels of priming treatments, including control, NaCl (350 mM), SA (1100 ppm), and osmo-priming with PEG6000 (−1.2 Mpa) for 9 h [57]. Then, the germination test was performed as described in the previous section.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The data were tested for normality via the Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test [58]. They were then analyzed using SAS software (version 9.3), and the graphs were plotted in Excel. To show the effect of aging on the slope of germination percentage and emergence percentage, the regression test was performed by Excel 2010 software. The means were compared by Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) in the case where the F-test of the two-way ANOVA was at least at the p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 level of confidence.

3. Results

3.1. Accelerated Aging (AA) Effects on Germination and Emergence Traits

Seed vigor was affected by the accelerated aging test (Table 1). The seed accelerated aging reduced the germination percentage (GP), seedling traits emergence percentage, and emergence rate. The percentage of reduction of seedling traits and the percentage and speed of emergence to seed aging did not follow the same trend. So that the highest percentage reduction (PR) of germination percentage (36.9), germination rate (31.75 seed/day), and the lowest percentage reduction (PR) of germination percentage (2), germination rate (5.40 seed/day) were observed in line 3 and line 9, respectively. The highest percentage reduction (PR) of the shoot length (33.06) and the lowest percentage reduction (PR) of it (0.18) were observed in line 1 and line 6, respectively. The highest percentage reduction (PR) of root length (65.22) and the lowest percentage reduction (PR) of it (6.46) were observed in line 3 and line 8, respectively. The highest percentage reduction (PR) of the seedling vigor index (41.69) and the lowest percentage reduction (PR) of it (1.48) were observed in line 3 and line 10, respectively. The highest percentage reduction (PR) of the root shoot ratio (8.36) and the lowest percentage reduction (PR) of it (0.42) was observed in line 2 and line 5, respectively. The highest percentage reduction (PR) of the root dry weight (55.42) and the lowest percentage reduction (PR) of it (2.83) were observed in line 3 and line 10, respectively. The highest percentage reduction (PR) of the shoot dry weight (44.66) and the lowest percentage reduction (PR) of it (2) were observed in line 3 and line 11, respectively. The highest percentage reduction (PR) of the emergence percentage (19.46) and the lowest percentage reduction (PR) of it (3.73) were observed in line 3 and line 12, respectively. The highest percentage reduction (PR) of the emergence rate (27.27 seed/day) and the lowest percentage reduction (PR) of it (20 seed/day) were observed in line 2 and line 12, respectively (Table 1).
We can use the average reduction percentage for the final evaluation of cultivars regarding the effect of aging on germination percentage, germination rate, seedling traits, emergence percentage, and emergence rate. The highest and lowest mean reductions percentage of germination percentage (GP), the germination rate (GR), the shoot length (SL), the root length (RL), the seedling vigor index (SVI), the root shoot ratio (R/S), the root dry weight (RDW), the shoot dry weight (SDW), the emergence percentage (EP) and the emergence rate (ER) occurred in (Ka/b)(Cr/b)F2, La (4B,4D)/b lines and (Ma/b)(Cr/b)F4, (St/b)(Cr/b)F4 lines, respectively (Figure 1). So (Ma/b)(Cr/b)F4, (St/b)(Cr/b)F4, and (Ka/b)(Cr/b)F2, La(4B,4D)/b lines were introduced as the tolerant and sensitive lines to seed deterioration, respectively.
The trends of average germination and emergence percentage were affected by seed aging of Tritipyrum lines.
Seed aging reduced germination and emergence rate (slope of germination curve over time) (Figure 2). The germination process in control seeds (not aged) and aged seeds follows the logarithmic model with 93% accuracy, and seed aging has not reduced the prediction accuracy. However, the prediction accuracy of emergence, a situation similar to a farm, has decreased by 90%.
Seed aging reduced the percentage of final germination (83.5) and the percentage of final emergence (49.28) compared to the control (94.4). Additionally, seed aging decreased the germination slope from 44.33 (control) to 42.2 and reduced the emergence percentage to 25 in the aged seeds.
Seed aging delayed reaching maximum germination and reaching maximum emergence by one and two days, respectively. Thus, the maximum germination in the control seed occurred on the sixth day, but in the aged seeds, it occurred on the seventh day, and the maximum emergence occurred on the ninth day (Table 2).
Tolerance Index (TI) to aging was evaluated to introduce aging-tolerant cultivars. The PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines showed different responses to aging tolerance. The lowest and highest TI manifested in the germination percentage (GP), the germination rate (GR), the shoot length (SL), the root length (RL), the seedling vigor index (R/S), the root shoot ratio (RSW), the root dry weight (RDW), the shoot dry weight (SDW), the emergence percentage (EP) and the emergence rate (ER) occurred in (Ka/b)(Cr/b)F2 (56.3), La(4B,4D)/b (67) lines and (Ma/b)(Cr/b)F4 (99), (St/b)(Cr/b)F4 (98) lines, respectively (Figure 3). Finally, (Ma/b)(Cr/b)F4, (St/b)(Cr/b)F4, and (Ka/b)(Cr/b)F2, La(4B,4D)/b was introduced as the tolerant and sensitive lines to seed deterioration, respectively.

3.2. Biochemical Parameters and Membrane Permeability

The effect of aging on membrane permeability was estimated based on the electrolyte, protein, and potassium leakages. The EC values recorded for the seeds of PTCT lines were different. The ECs were enhanced by seed aging, so their measurements of the leachates from the aged seed were significantly more than the non-aged seed. The highest and lowest ECs were recorded in (Ka/b)(Cr/b)F2 (132.33 μS cm−1 g−1) and La(4B,4D)/b (145.44 μS cm−1 g−1) lines and (Ma/b)(Cr/b)F4 (58.66) and (St/b)(Cr/b)F4 (59.33) lines, respectively. In this study, protein and potassium leakage values differed after the seed lines’ aging treatments. The seed protein and potassium leakages were affected by its aging. The values of protein and potassium leakages from the aged seeds were significantly higher than those of the control treatments (not aged) (Table 3).

3.3. Cytogenetic Analysis

The mitotic results followed by observing the root-tip cells demonstrated mitotic depression, various types of chromosomal abnormalities, and changes in the Mitotic Index (MI) using different artificial aging treatments to the seeds. Since the cytological qualities of the seeds were negatively influenced by Accelerated-Aging (AA) stress through increasing temperatures, using artificial aging stress was an efficient method to study the alterations caused by the seed deterioration process. Different temperatures induced various mitotic abnormalities, including chromosome bridge (a, b, c, d), chromosome fragment (e, f), chromosome stickiness (g, h), disorganized cell (i), laggard chromosome (j), chromosome break (k, l, m), unequal anaphase (n, o), and disturbed metaphase (p) in the root-tip cells (Figure 4, Table 4 and Table 5). The highest and lowest percentages of chromosomal abnormalities were evidenced in the seeds treated at 70 °C and the control treatments. In this study, MI was an efficient index for detecting the seed deterioration process, which ranged from 2.40 to 12.00%, with a sharp decrease in rate throughout the treatments due to applying higher stress temperatures (Table 4). The highest depression in cell division was witnessed in the seed’s root tips of the seeds, which were stored at 70 °C with an MI value of not more than 2.4% compared with 12% in the control treatments. In general, the rate of mitotic division is precisely related to ATP levels. Therefore, cell division can be an energy-dependent process. Chromosome movement mainly depends on the energy-generating system. It can be assumed that any toxic materials in the aged seeds may disturb their respiratory pathways, producing low-energy and other essential ATP compounds like sugars and protein molecules. PTCT lines also showed a susceptible attitude toward long-term storage in the gene bank and maintained germination and vigor for a longer period. This aspect is in line with the chromosomal abnormalities induced by AA.

3.4. Seed Priming

GP, GR, and seedling traits of the aged seeds of PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines were improved by pretreatments. GP and GR were significantly augmented by priming. Their highest values were observed in the seeds primed with PEG6000 and NaCl, respectively. Treatment with polyethylene glycol ameliorated GP up to 69/58 compared to the control treatments (unprimed seeds). Seed priming of the deteriorated seeds significantly impacted the SVI and GE values of the seedlings. The highest SVI and GE values were observed in the deteriorated seeds primed with PEG6000. Therefore, treatment with PEG6000 enhanced SVI and GE in the seedlings up to 13/15 and 2/23, respectively, compared to the control treatments. Root Dry Weight (RDW) and Shoot Dry Weight (SDW) were also significantly augmented by priming (Table 6).

4. Discussion

The reduction percentage and the Tolerance Index of germination and emergence traits of the aged seed showed that (Ma/b)(Cr/b)F4, (St/b)(Cr/b)F4 PTCT lines are the most tolerant lines to seed deterioration. Instead, the more sensitive lines were (Ka/b)(Cr/b)F2 and La(4B,4D)/b. The results obtained from seed aging about (St/b)(Cr/b)F3 line is promising, also considering its potential in salinity tolerance, as demonstrated by Pirsalami et al. (2021) [59]. Furthermore, seed aging decreased cell membrane stability and increased the electrolyte, protein, and potassium leakages. This physiological parameter was inversely related to seed quality [60]. Differences in the EC values indicated that the membrane’s nature and extent of protection were not the same in the studied seed lines. Seed deterioration is associated with increased permeability of the seed membrane, leading to higher electrolyte leakage during imbibition [61]. During storage, the seeds gradually get old and lose their strength through coagulation and the breakdown of proteins [62]. The more sensitive the storage condition, the faster the process develops as the temperature of the seed mass increases [63]. We noticed that artificial aging causes cytological damage in seeds and chromosomal abnormalities. It is known that chromosomal aberrations increase during seed aging [64]. We observed that, at mitosis, the enhancing seed age led to the percentage reduction of the dividing cells. With increasing temperature, the number of cells under division decreases while chromosomal abnormalities and injuries increase, leading, for example, to the formation of anaphase and telophase bridges [65,66,67]. The chromosomal bridge may be caused by chromosomal adhesion and the subsequent inability of chromosomes to initiate a normal anaphase separation. It may be attributed to unequal transmission or the origin of chromosomal fragments [68]. Hence, cell division phases are considered helpful for detecting the seed deterioration process. This study’s cell numbers at the interphase stage ranged from 440 to 488. MI indicates the frequency of mitotic division, in which temperature increase and reduces. With increasing deterioration time, a decrease in cell division was observed.
Chromosomal abnormalities in the mitotic cells of degraded seeds are detected via micronucleosis and chromosome breakage and bridge [69]. Chromosome fragment formation might be due to chromosomes’ stickiness followed by separation failure. Breakage and reunion of the broken ends lead to chromosome bridges, which could be observed until early telophase. Our results of cytological changes in the root-tip cells of the aged seeds confirmed the previous studies [69,70]. In prophase, chromosomes are already visible, preparing to enter metaphase. When they exhibit a distinct pattern of organization, any irregularities occur probably due to mitotic spindle formation and chromosome condensation triggered by already duplicated chromosomes in the interphase. Chromosome disorganization at this stage would interfere with the regularity of metaphase chromosomes due to disturbances in mitotic spindle organization. Disorganized metaphase chromosomes appear due to their diffuse arrangements in the equatorial planes of the cells. This chromosome aberration is considered a sign of spindle malformation or partial inactivation. However, little is known about the activities of the directly regulated zones [71]. Therefore, the chromosomes organized in the equatorial plates represent regular cell divisions in the metaphase [72]. Only low cell irregularities were detected in the control treatments in this research, while aberrations were observed in the stress treatments.
Applying priming in the accelerated seed of PTCT lines was promising (Table 6). It was observed that primed seeds’ germination traits were greater than untreated seeds. In addition, the germination traits were enhanced by applying all three priming treatments (halo-priming, hormone-priming, and osmo-priming). Seed priming promotes efficient germination by inducing a more favorable physiological state. It regulates hydration that starts the normal metabolic process during the early stages of germination before the protrusion of the radicle [73]. In this study, osmo-priming increased germination traits further than hydropriming and hormone-priming (Table 6), as Mohajeri et al. (2016) observed. They reported that polyethylene glycol application for seed priming improved vetch seeds’ root dry weight and shot dry weight values [74].
Furthermore, Chen et al. (2021) observed that PEG6000 application for seed priming improved germination percentage and germination rate [75]. Osmo-priming can benefit abiotic stresses like drought, extreme temperature, and salinity, generating different pre-germination metabolic activities, improving the antioxidant system, and preparing the seed for radicle protrusion [76]. In our study, priming significantly affected shoot and root length (Table 6). The highest and lowest mean values of these traits were observed in hormonal priming with SA and the control treatments, respectively (Table 6). These outcomes match with those attained by Tabatabaei [77]. Many field crops have reported increasing SVI and GE values in seedlings by priming seeds [78,79,80,81]. Rosinska et al. (2023) reported the benefits of osmo-priming on germination and seedling vigor in carrots seeds. They demonstrated the potentiality of this treatment also to mitigate biotic stress [82]. PTCT lines’ best germination percentage, germination rate, shoot length, root length, seedling vigor index, and dry seedling weight were observed in seeds treated by osmo-priming compared to the control. Possible mechanisms for improved germination traits by halo-priming, hormone-priming, and osmo-priming are activation of water-induced metabolic processes, improved repair due to enzyme activity, and production of hormones. Osmo-priming with PEG enhances some of the antioxidant enzymes, such as the activities of catalase-peroxidase in seedlings exposed to stress, thus increasing seed germination and stand establishment [83]. In other research, Zhang and colleagues found that osmo-priming with PEG improved cell membrane stability, enhanced superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase, and decreased lipid peroxidation, compared to non-primed seeds [84].

5. Conclusions

It is a well-known fact that some seeds of Tritipyrum lines are susceptible to aging. The latter significantly decreases germination and emergence traits and enhances leakage of cellular solutes of PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines. In this research, these responses to seed deterioration were varied, indicating genetic diversities of the PTCT lines. These genetic diversities were also underlined by the different Tolerance Indexes (TI) obtained after aging. Some PTCT lines were prone to long-term storage in the gene bank and could maintain germination and vigor, as also evidenced by the chromosomal abnormalities induced by the artificial aging of seeds. Nevertheless, the vigor of the deteriorated seeds of the PTCT lines was significantly improved by priming. The treatment could ameliorate the germination and seedling establishment rate of the PTCT lines of the aged seeds. These findings are in line with our previous studies on other cereals like wheat and triticale. We observed that these PTCT lines gave a positive response to priming. In addition, we observed an enhancement of the early vigor of Tritipyrum line seeds by using priming.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T. and H.S.H.; methodology, H.M. and S.N.; software, Y.R.D.; validation, M.T. and H.S.H.; formal analysis, H.M.; investigation, M.T. and S.N.; resources, M.T.; data curation, Y.R.D. and L.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T. and S.N.; writing—review and editing, S.N., B.F. and L.P.; supervision, M.T.; project administration, M.T.; funding acquisition, B.F., L.P. and Y.R.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De Vitis, M.; Hay, F.R.; Dickie, J.B.; Trivedi, C.; Choi, J.; Fiegener, R. Seed Storage: Maintaining Seed Viability and Vigor for Restoration Use. Restor. Ecol. 2020, 28, S249–S255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nikitina, E.; Kuznetsova, V.; Kroupin, P.; Karlov, G.I.; Divashuk, M.G. Development of Specific Thinopyrum cytogenetic Markers for Wheat-Wheatgrass Hybrids Using Sequencing and QPCR Data. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. El-Beltagi, H.S.; Basit, A.; Mohamed, H.I.; Ali, I.; Ullah, S.; Kamel, E.A.R.; Shalaby, T.A.; Ramadan, K.M.A.; Alkhateeb, A.A.; Ghazzawy, H.S. Mulching as a Sustainable Water and Soil Saving Practice in Agriculture: A Review. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Srivastava, N. Salt Stress Responses and Tolerance in Wheat. In Wheat Production in Changing Environments; Springer: Singaprore, 2019; pp. 89–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Grewal, S.; Yang, C.; Edwards, S.H.; Scholefield, D.; Ashling, S.; Burridge, A.J.; King, I.P.; King, J. Characterisation of Thinopyrum bessarabicum Chromosomes through Genome-Wide Introgressions into Wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 389–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. William, M.D.H.M.; Mujeeb-Kazi, A. Thinopyrum bessarabicum: Biochemical and Cytological Markers for the Detection of Genetic Introgression in Its Hybrid Derivatives with Triticum aestivum L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1993, 86–86, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khokhar, J.S.; Sareen, S.; Tyagi, B.S.; Wilson, L.; Young, S.; King, J.; King, I.; Broadley, M.R. Novel Sources of Variation in Grain Yield, Components and Mineral Traits Identified in Wheat Amphidiploids Derived from Thinopyrum bessarabicum (Savul. & Rayss) Á. Löve (Poaceae) under Saline Soils in India. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. King, I.P.; Law, C.N.; Cant, K.A.; Orford, S.E.; Reader, S.M.; Miller, T.E. Tritipyrum, a Potential New Salt-Tolerant Cereal. Plant Breed. 1997, 116, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vidak, M.; Lazarević, B.; Javornik, T.; Šatović, Z.; Carović-Stanko, K. Seed Water Absorption, Germination, Emergence and Seedling Phenotypic Characterization of the Common Bean Landraces Differing in Seed Size and Color. Seeds 2022, 1, 324–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arif, M.A.R.; Afzal, I.; Börner, A. Genetic Aspects and Molecular Causes of Seed Longevity in Plants—A Review. Plants 2022, 11, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Farokhzadeh, S.; Shahsavand Hassani, H.; Mohammadi-Nejad, G.; Zinati, Z. Evaluation of Grain Yield Stability of Tritipyrum as a Novel Cereal in Comparison with Triticale Lines and Bread Wheat Varieties through Univariate and Multivariate Parametric Methods. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0274588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shaw, N.; Barak, R.S.; Campbell, R.E.; Kirmer, A.; Pedrini, S.; Dixon, K.; Frischie, S. Seed Use in the Field: Delivering Seeds for Restoration Success. Restor. Ecol. 2020, 28, S276–S285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ramtekey, V.; Cherukuri, S.; Kumar, S.; Kudekally, S.V.; Sheoran, S.; Bashar, K.U.; Naik, B.K.; Kumar, S.; Singh, A.N.; Singh, H.V. Seed Longevity in Legumes: Deeper Insights into Mechanisms and Molecular Perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rajjou, L.; Debeaujon, I. Seed Longevity: Survival and Maintenance of High Germination Ability of Dry Seeds. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2008, 331, 796–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chutia, J.; Borah, S.P. Water Stress Effects on Leaf Growth and Chlorophyll Content but Not the Grain Yield in Traditional Rice (Oryza sativa Linn.) Genotypes of Assam, India II. Protein and Proline Status in Seedlings under PEG Induced Water Stress. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 971–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Reed, R.C.; Bradford, K.J.; Khanday, I. Seed Germination and Vigor: Ensuring Crop Sustainability in a Changing Climate. Heredity 2022, 128, 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Thirusendura Selvi, D.; Saraswathy, S. Seed Viability, Seed Deterioration and Seed Quality Improvements in Stored Onion Seeds: A Review. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 93, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Walters, C.; Ballesteros, D.; Vertucci, V.A. Structural Mechanics of Seed Deterioration: Standing the Test of Time. Plant Sci. 2010, 179, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rice, K.J.; Dyer, A.R. Seed Aging, Delayed Germination and Reduced Competitive Ability in Bromus Tectorum. Plant Ecol. 2001, 155, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Boakye Boadu, K.; Siaw, D.E.K.A. The Effect of Storage Period on the Viability of Triplochiton scleroxylon K. Schum. Seeds. Sci. Afr. 2019, 5, e00127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bewley, J.D.; Bradford, K.J.; Hilhorst, H.W.M.; Nonogaki, H. Longevity, Storage, and Deterioration. In Seeds; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 341–376. [Google Scholar]
  22. Oskouei, B.; Majidi Heravan, E.; Hamidi, A.; Moradi, F.; Moghaddam, A. Study of Accelerated Aging Time Effect on Seed Different Size and Shapes Vigor of Hybrid Corn (Zea mays), Cv. Single Cross 704. Iran. J. Seed Sci. Res. 2015, 2, 45–53. [Google Scholar]
  23. Finch-Savage, W.E.; Bassel, G.W. Seed Vigour and Crop Establishment: Extending Performance beyond Adaptation. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 567–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Sukesh; Chandrashe, K.R. Biochemical Changes During the Storage of Seeds of Hopea ponga (Dennst.) Mabberly: An Endemic Species of Western Ghats. Res. J. Seed Sci. 2011, 4, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Jatoi, S.A.; Afzal, M.; Nasim, S.; Anwar, R. Seed Deterioration Study in Pea, Using Accelerated Ageing Techniques. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2001, 4, 1490–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kapoor, N.; Arya, A.; Siddiqui, M.A.; Amir, A.; Kumar, H. Seed Deterioration in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Accelerated Ageing. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2010, 9, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Tabur, S.; Demir, K. Role of Some Growth Regulators on Cytogenetic Activity of Barley under Salt Stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2009, 60, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hamdani, A. Cytological and phenological characterization of adapted genetic stocks derived from Triticum aestivum/Thinopyrum bessarabicum. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2018, 55, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Katabale, M.K.; Esther, N.; Kariuki, D. Phytochemical Screening, Cytotoxic, Genotoxic and Mutagenic Effects of the Aqueous Extract of Azadirachta indica Leaves. Int. J. Herb. Med. 2017, 5, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pavlova, D. Nickel Effect on Root-Meristem Cell Division in Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae) Seedlings. Aust. J. Bot. 2017, 65, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marcos Filho, J. Seed Vigor Testing: An Overview of the Past, Present and Future Perspective. Sci. Agric. 2015, 72, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Flores, P.; Poggi, D.; Gariglio, N.; Catraro, M. Accelerated Aging Test to Assess Vigor of Juglans nigra Seeds. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 2020, 20, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aosa, I. Seed Vigor Testing Handbook; Contribution 32; Association of Official Seed Analysts: Washington, DC, USA, 1983; p. 88. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fessel, S.A.; Vieira, R.D.; daCruz, M.C.P.; de Paula, R.C.; Panobianco, M. Electrical Conductivity Testing of Corn Seeds as Influenced by Temperature and Period of Storage. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2006, 41, 1551–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Waterworth, W.M.; Bray, C.M.; West, C.E. Seeds and the Art of Genome Maintenance. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ur Rehman, H.; Iqbal, H.; Basra, S.M.A.; Afzal, I.; Farooq, M.; Wakeel, A.; WANG, N. Seed priming improves early seedling vigor, growth and productivity of spring maize. J. Integr. Agric. 2015, 14, 1745–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. da Silva, M.F.; Araújo, E.F.; da Silva, L.J.; Amaro, H.T.R.; Dias, L.A.D.S.; Dias, D.C.F.D.S. Tolerance of Crambe (Crambe abyssinica Hochst) to Salinity and Water Stress during Seed Germination and Initial Seedling Growth. Ciência E Agrotecnologia 2019, 43, e025418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Mahakham, W.; Sarmah, A.K.; Maensiri, S.; Theerakulpisut, P. Nanopriming Technology for Enhancing Germination and Starch Metabolism of Aged Rice Seeds Using Phytosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Emmerich, W.E.; Hardegree, S.P. Polyethylene Glycol Solution Contact Effects on Seed Germination. Agron. J. 1990, 82, 1103–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Paparella, S.; Araújo, S.S.; Rossi, G.; Wijayasinghe, M.; Carbonera, D.; Balestrazzi, A. Seed Priming: State of the Art and New Perspectives. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 1281–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shi, Q.; Zhu, Z. Effects of Exogenous Salicylic Acid on Manganese Toxicity, Element Contents and Antioxidative System in Cucumber. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2008, 63, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jisha, K.C.; Puthur, J.T. Seed Priming with Beta-Amino Butyric Acid Improves Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Rice Seedlings. Rice Sci. 2016, 23, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. El-Sanatawy, A.M.; Ash-Shormillesy, S.M.A.I.; Qabil, N.; Awad, M.F.; Mansour, E. Seed Halo-Priming Improves Seedling Vigor, Grain Yield, and Water Use Efficiency of Maize under Varying Irrigation Regimes. Water 2021, 13, 2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. De Souza, L.M.; da Conceição, E.M.; Barbosa, M.R.; Palhares Neto, L.; dos Santos, A.M.M.; de Souza, R.A.; Houllou, L.M. Effect of Seed Priming with NaCl on the Induction of Salinity Tolerance in Myracrodruon urundeuva Allemão in Vitro. Ciência Florest. 2022, 32, 2199–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kamleshkumar Vaktabhai, C.; Kumar, S.; Sanjeev Kumar, C. Seedling Invigouration by Halo Priming in Tomato against Salt Stress. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 716–722. [Google Scholar]
  46. ISTA. Handbook of Vigour Test Methods, 3rd ed.; ISTA: Zurich, Switzerland, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kibasa, V.; Mahajan, G.; Chauhan, B.S. Seed Germination Ecology of Hood Canarygrass (Phalaris paradoxa L.) and Herbicide Options for Its Control. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 15241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Roberts, E.H.; Ellis, R.H. Seed Physiology and Seed Quality in Soyabean. In Seed Quality and Storage of Soybeans; Mississippi State University: Starkville, MS, USA, 1980; pp. 297–311. [Google Scholar]
  49. El-Nashar, Y.I.; Dewir, Y.H. Stimulation of Germination and Seedling Vigor in Dormant Seeds of African Juniper. Horttechnology 2019, 29, 874–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Bianconi, D.; Pietrini, F.; Massacci, A.; Iannelli, M.A. Uptake of Cadmium by Lemna minor, a (Hyper?-) Accumulator Plant Involved in Phytoremediation Applications. E3S Web Conf. 2013, 1, 13002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Vieira, R.D.; Penariol, A.L.; Perecin, D.; Panobianco, M. Condutividade Elétrica e Teor de Água Inicial Das Sementes de Soja. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2002, 37, 1333–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Miguel, M.V.D.C.; Marcos Filho, J. Potassium Leakage and Maize Seed Physiological Potential. Sci. Agric. 2002, 59, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. de Paula, J.M.; Ferreira Pinto-Maglio, C.A. Technique to Obtain Mitotic Chromosomes of Conyza bonariensis L. Cronquist (Asteraceae). Am. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1466–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Souza, S.A.M.; Martins, K.C.; Pereira, T.N.S. Polimorfismo Cromossômico Em Capsicum Chinense Jacq. Cienc. Rural. 2011, 41, 1777–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Asthana, M.; Kumar, A. Dose Response of Viola Odorata on Meiotic and Mitotic Chromosomes of Vicia faba. J. Pharm. Res. Int. 2014, 4, 520–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Najafi, S.; Anakhatoon, E.Z.; Birsin, M.A. Karyotype Characterisation of Reputed Variety of Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) in West Azerbaijan-Iran. J. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2013, 7, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  57. Taghvaei, M.; Maleki, H. Introducing Sensitive Strains to Degradation. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on New Findings in Agricultural Sciences of Natural Resources and Environment, Tehran, Iran, 16 March 2013. [Google Scholar]
  58. Zar, J.H. Biostatistical Analysis, 5th ed.; Prantice Hill: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pirsalami, Z.; Masoumiasl, A.; Shahsevand hasani, H.; Dehdari, M. Comparison of Salinity Tolerance in Non-Iranian Primary Tritipyrum Promising Lines with Two Wheat Cultivars in Germination Stage. Iran. J. Seed Res. 2021, 7, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Koostra, P.T.; Harrington, J.F. Biotechnical Effects of Age on Membrane Lipids of Cucumis sativus L. Seed. Proc. Int. Seed Test. Assoc. 1969, 34, 329–340. [Google Scholar]
  61. Parrish, D.J.; Leopold, A.C. On the Mechanism of Aging in Soybean Seeds. Plant Physiol. 1978, 61, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Adetunji, A.E.; Adetunji, T.L.; Varghese, B.; Sershen; Pammenter, N.W. Oxidative Stress, Ageing and Methods of Seed Invigoration: An Overview and Perspectives. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Prasad, P.V.V.; Staggenborg, S.A.; Ristic, Z. Impacts of Drought and/or Heat Stress on Physiological, Developmental, Growth, and Yield Processes of Crop Plants. In Response of Crops to Limited Water: Understanding and Modeling Water Stress Effects on Plant Growth Processes; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 301–355. [Google Scholar]
  64. Waterworth, W.M.; Footitt, S.; Bray, C.M.; Finch-Savage, W.E.; West, C.E. DNA Damage Checkpoint Kinase ATM Regulates Germination and Maintains Genome Stability in Seeds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 9647–9652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Ranjbar, M.; Karamian, R.; Hadadi, A.; Ranjbar, M.; Karamian, R.; Hadadi, A. Biosystematic Study of Onobrchis viciifolia Scop. and Onobrchis altissima Grossh. (Fabaceae) in Iran. Iran. J. Bot. 2009, 15, 85–95. [Google Scholar]
  66. Souza, M.M.; Martins, E.R.; Pereira, T.N.S.; Oliveira, L.O. Reproductive Studies on Ipecac (Cephaelis ipecacuanha (Brot.) A. Rich; Rubiaceae): Meiotic Behavior and Pollen Viability. Braz. J. Biol. 2006, 66, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Pampalona, J.; Roscioli, E.; Silkworth, W.T.; Bowden, B.; Genescà, A.; Tusell, L.; Cimini, D. Chromosome Bridges Maintain Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment throughout Mitosis and Rarely Break during Anaphase. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Ahmad Bhat, T.; Sharma, M.; Anis, M. Comparative Analysis of Mitotic Aberrations Induced by Diethyl Sulphate (DES) and Sodium Azide (SA) in Vicia faba L. (Fabaceae). Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2007, 10, 783–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Jangjoo, F.; Tajbakhsh-shishvan, M. Effect of Different Pre-Treatments on Germination Indices and Chromosomal Aberrations of Aged Onion Seeds (Allium cepa). Iran. J. Seed Res. 2020, 7, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Menezes, V.O.; Lopes, S.J.; Tedesco, S.B.; Henning, F.A.; Zen, H.D.; Mertz, L.M. Cytogenetic Analysis of Wheat Seeds Submitted to Artificial Aging Stress. J. Seed Sci. 2014, 36, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Marcano, L.; Carryon, I.; Del Campo, A.; Montiel, X. Cytotoxicity and Mode of Action of Maleic Hydrazide in Root Tips of Allium cepa L. Environ. Res. 2004, 94, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Bosio, S.; Laughinghouse, H.D., IV. Bioindicator of Genotoxicity: The Allium Cepa Test. In Environmental Contamination; InTech: Moscow, Russia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Gao, G.; Ali, I.; Wu, X.; Tang, M.; Chen, L.; Jiang, L.; Liang, T. Effects of Various Seed Priming on Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Traits of Rice under Chilling Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Mohajeri, F.; Taghvaei, M.; Ramrudi, M.; Galavi, M. Effect of Priming Duration and Concentration on Germination Behaviors of (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Seeds. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Conserv. 2016, 22, 603–609. [Google Scholar]
  75. Chen, X.; Zhang, R.; Xing, Y.; Jiang, B.; Li, B.; Xu, X.; Zhou, Y. The Efficacy of Different Seed Priming Agents for Promoting Sorghum Germination under Salt Stress. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0245505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lei, C.; Bagavathiannan, M.; Wang, H.; Sharpe, S.M.; Meng, W.; Yu, J. Osmopriming with Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Germinating Crop Seeds: A Review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tabatabaei, S. The Effect of Priming on Germination and Enzyme Activity of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Seeds after Accelerated Aging. J. Stress Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 4, 132–138. [Google Scholar]
  78. Ghasemi Lemraski, D. Effect of Priming on Seed Germination Characteristics of Wheat (Triticum sestivum L.) Cultivars. Seed Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  79. Sheikhnavaz Jahed, P.; Sedghi, M.; Seyedsharifi, R.; Sofalian, O. Effect of Seed Priming on Physiological and Germination Characteristics of Deteriorated Seed of Squash (Cucurbita pepo L. var. Styrica) under Salinity Stress. Iran. J. Seed Sci. Technol. 2022, 11, 53–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ansari, O.; Sharif Zadeh, F. Low Moisture Content Reduction (SMCR) Can Improve Some Seed Germination Indexes in Primed Seeds of Mountain Rye (Secale montanum) under Accelerated Aging Conditions. Seed Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
  81. Ramezani, M.; Rezai-sokhet, B. Effect of Osmotic Treatment on Seed Germination of Tomato (Lycopersicom esculentum Mill.). J. Agric. Lasting Manuf. 2013, 21, 2–15. [Google Scholar]
  82. Rosińska, A.; Andrzejak, R.; Kakkerla, V. Effect of Osmopriming with Melatonin on Germination, Vigor and Health of Daucus carota L. Seeds. Agriculture 2023, 13, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Goswami, A.; Banerjee, R.; Raha, S. Drought Resistance in Rice Seedlings Conferred by Seed Priming. Protoplasma 2013, 250, 1115–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhang, F.; Yu, J.; Johnston, C.R.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, K.; Lu, F.; Zhang, Z.; Zou, J. Seed Priming with Polyethylene Glycol Induces Physiological Changes in Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Seedlings under Suboptimal Soil Moisture Environments. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0140620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Reduction Percentage (RP) of the germination and emergence traits after seed aging of PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines. Results followed by the same case letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Figure 1. Reduction Percentage (RP) of the germination and emergence traits after seed aging of PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines. Results followed by the same case letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Sustainability 15 09505 g001
Figure 2. The effect of seed aging on the average trend germination and emergence percentage of PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines. Data represented germination and emergence from three and four replication, respectively. Control: germination percentage of non-aged seeds; AG%: germination percentage of aged seed in the laboratory; AE%: emergence percentage of aged seed in the greenhouse.
Figure 2. The effect of seed aging on the average trend germination and emergence percentage of PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines. Data represented germination and emergence from three and four replication, respectively. Control: germination percentage of non-aged seeds; AG%: germination percentage of aged seed in the laboratory; AE%: emergence percentage of aged seed in the greenhouse.
Sustainability 15 09505 g002
Figure 3. Tolerance index (TI) of germination and emergence traits after seed accelerated aging of PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines. Results followed by the same case letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Figure 3. Tolerance index (TI) of germination and emergence traits after seed accelerated aging of PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines. Results followed by the same case letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Sustainability 15 09505 g003
Figure 4. Different abnormalities in mitosis and chromosomes on aged seeds; Chromosome Bridge (ad); Chromosome Fragment (e,f); Chromosome Stickiness (g,h); Disorganized cell (i); Laggard Chromosomes (j); Chromosome Break (km); Unequal anaphase (n,o); Disturbed Metaphase (p).
Figure 4. Different abnormalities in mitosis and chromosomes on aged seeds; Chromosome Bridge (ad); Chromosome Fragment (e,f); Chromosome Stickiness (g,h); Disorganized cell (i); Laggard Chromosomes (j); Chromosome Break (km); Unequal anaphase (n,o); Disturbed Metaphase (p).
Sustainability 15 09505 g004
Table 1. Effect of seed accelerated aging on germination and emergence traits of PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines.
Table 1. Effect of seed accelerated aging on germination and emergence traits of PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines.
Line1234567891011121314
GPNA100 a98 a97.33 a89.33 a94.67 a100 a98.67 a100 a100 a100 a100 a97.33 a97.33 a97 a
A80 b93 b61.33 b70.67 b86.67 b81.33 b92 b95.33 b98 b98.67 b92 b84 b93.33 b96 b
PR (%) 205.1036.920.888.4518.676.764.6721.33813.694.101.03
GRNA0.24 a0.39 a0.38 a0.35 a0.35 a0.41 a0.43 a0.38 a0.37 a0.36 a0.43 a0.39 a0.33 a0.42 a
A0.2 b0.3 b0.26 b0.3 b0.311 b0.27 b0.3 b0.33 ab0.35 ab0.25 b0.24 b0.29 b0.3 b0.38 b
PR (%) 16.6623.0731.5714.2811.1434.1430.2313.155.4030.5544.1825.649.099.52
SLNA9.98 a10.80 a7.12 a9.29 a9.41 a9.96 a11.08 a11.5 a11.8 a10.18 a10.23 a9.77 a10.37 a11.98 a
A6.68 b9.86 b6.62 b7.47 b9.3 ab9.95 ab8.1 b11.4 a10.35 ab9.36 b10.03 a9.55 a6.72 b10.1 b
PR (%) 33.0699.087.0219.591.160.1826.890.8612.288.051.952.2535.1915.69
RLNA10.81 a13.17 a9.72 a7.77 a9.06 a9.92 a8.49 a14.07 a15.13 a12 a9.07 a11.32 a9.84 a14.45 a
A9.86 b8.45 b3.38 b5.67 b8.41 b8.22 b7.77 b13.16 ab13.87 b7.91 b8.4 b9.1 b7.41 b13.25 b
PR (%) 8.78835.8365.2227.027.1717.138.486.468.3234.087.3819.6124.698.30
SVINA797 a1045 a694.6 a719.5 a889.4 a940.6 a1091.7 a1017 a1186.6 a936.66 a959 a923.81 a971.21 a1394 a
A766 a834 b405 b589 b816.8 a822.45 b898.9 b956 ab1035 ab922.80 b846 b836.82 b658.26 b1234 b
PR (%) 3.76 b20.1941.6918.138.1612.5617.6515.8312.781.4811.789.4132.2211.47
R/SNA1.22 a1.22 a1.05 a0.70 a0.95 a1.02 a0.98 a1.24 a1.34 a1.29 a0.98 a1.35 a1.87 a1.21 a
A0.89 b0.2 b0.45 b0.62 a0.91 a0.79 b0.74 ab1.16 a1.28 a0.76 ab0.88 ab0.92 b0.95 b1.10 ab
PR (%) 2.708.365.711.140.422.252.440.640.444.101.023.184.910.90
RDWNA0.08 a0.14 a0.08 a0.08 a0.09 a0.1 a0.1 a0.06 a0.11 a0.14 a0.12 a0.09 a0.11 a0.14 a
A0.06 b0.10 ab0.04 b0.06 bc0.06 ab0.08 ab0.07 ab0.06 a0.10 a0.14 a0.11 a0.08 a0.10 ab0.13 a
PR (%) 2527.9755.4225.9731.0314.4327.833.385.502.836.778.048.847.14
SDWNA0.11 a0.17 a0.103 a0.93 a0.1 a0.13 a0.15 a0.08 a0.16 a0.18 a0.15 a0.123 a0.15 a0.13 a
A0.1 ab0.15 ab0.06 b0.08 b0.08 b0.12 a0.10 ab0.08 a0.15 b0.17 ab0.14 ab0.11 b0.14 b0.13 a
PR (%) 11.811044.6691.3920.615.5131.338.0454.375.55213.004.663.70
EPNA91.33 a83.66 a87.33 a79.33 a85 a90.66 a89.6692.33 a93 a91 a90.33 a80.33 a87.33 a89 a
A80 b73.66 b70.33 c66 b74.66 b80 b78.66 b89 a89.6 a80 b80 b77.33 b77.3 b79.6 b
PR(%) 12.4011.9519.4616.8012.1611.7612.276.856.8812.0811.433.7311.4810.49
ERNA0.18 a0.22 a0.16 a0.18 a0.22 a0.19 a0.19 a0.24 a0.24 a0.2 a0.2 a0.20 a0.22 a0.24 a
A0.14 b0.16 b0.1 b0.12 b0.16 b0.14 bb0.14 bb0.2°0.2 a0.15 b0.15 b0.16 b0.17 b0.18 b
PR (%) 22.2227.2737.533.3327.2726.3126.3116.6616.6625252022.7225
Mean of PR (%) 15.6426.8834.5228.1512.7614.2919.027.657.4612.5011.9511.8515.799.32
Means that sharing the same letter does not differ significantly at p ≤ 0.05 between the lines. The traits represent the germination percentage (GP), the germination rate (GR), the shoot length (SL), the root length (RL), the seedling vigor index (SVI), the root shoot ratio (R/S), the root dry weight (RDW), the shoot dry weight (SDW), the emergence percentage (EP), the emergence rate (ER), the percentage reduction (PR), aged seeds (A) and not-aged seeds (NA).
Table 2. Comparison trend of germination and germination percentage of aged seeds with control of PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines.
Table 2. Comparison trend of germination and germination percentage of aged seeds with control of PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines.
Day123456789DMSlope
Control20.242.471829094.494.494.494.4644.33
AG%10.820.34259.874.280.283.583.583.5742.2
AE%3.577.8513.9227.534.6441.42474849.28925
Table 3. Effect of seed accelerated aging effect on electrical conductivity and the protein and potassium leakage values of PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines.
Table 3. Effect of seed accelerated aging effect on electrical conductivity and the protein and potassium leakage values of PTCT (Primary Trans Chromosomal Tritipyrum) lines.
Line1234567891011121314
ECNA19.852730.6943.1111.7427.5130.6619.3319.6036.712718.031017
A109.7097132.33145.44101.19118.6969.2358.6659.33125.6096.04105.3810574
KL (%)NA13981354153915531482153612981003103815291366142212971005
A25982553290029422782270023001603170327282562262225541953
PL (%)NA60646459636167561491965625667
A8086969587768268616386828079
Table 4. Different mitotic phases of root cells under five increasing aging treatments.
Table 4. Different mitotic phases of root cells under five increasing aging treatments.
Treatment *TACDCICPCMCACTMI (%)
REIRREIRREIRREIRREIR
T150059144014-17-16112-12.00
T250038345915-16-13608.20
T3500309461121125135-7.80
T450016947515--313-35.00
T55006648851-1-2122.40
* T1: control; T2: 24 h at 40 °C; T3: 24 h at 50 °C; T4: 24 h at 60 °C; T5: 24 h at 70 °C. Regular Cells (RE); Irregular Cells (IR); Total number of cells analyzed (TA); the number of cells under different phases of mitotic division (MD) at cell interphase (CI), cell prophase (CP), cell metaphase (CM), cell anaphase (CA), cell telophase (CT) and the mitotic index (MI) in seeds submitted to five different aging treatments.
Table 5. Types of cell division abnormalities mitotic phases of root cells under five increasing aging treatments.
Table 5. Types of cell division abnormalities mitotic phases of root cells under five increasing aging treatments.
Treatment *CDCBBDCTICIrregular Cells (%)
T1601--11.66
T2412-137.31
T3391-8923.07
T425171936.00
T51215-650.00
* T1: control; T2: 24 h at 40 °C; T3: 24 h at 50 °C; T4: 24 h at 60 °C; T5: 24 h at 70 °C; Total Number of cells under mitotic division (CD); number and types of cell division abnormalities: Chromosome Breaks (CB); Bridge (B); Disorganized Cells (DC) and Total number of Irregular Cells (TIC) in seeds submitted to five different aging treatments.
Table 6. Effect of different seed priming treatments on PTCT lines for germination percentage, germination rate, and seedling traits of aged seeds.
Table 6. Effect of different seed priming treatments on PTCT lines for germination percentage, germination rate, and seedling traits of aged seeds.
ControlNaClSalicylic AcidPolyethylene Glycol
Germination Traits
GP40 b57.92 ab65.00 ab69.58 a
GR0.30 b0.39 a0.37 a0.37 a
SL17.69 b11.11 a12.25 a11.84 a
GE1.19 b1.65 ab2.00 a2.23 a
RL4.04 b6.47 a6.89 a6.97 a
SL211.73 b17.49 a19.14 a18.81 a
SVI4.72 b10.50 ab12.36 ab13.15 a
RDW0.03 b0.07 a0.08 a0.07 a
SDW10.04 b0.08 a0.10 a0.10 a
SDW20.07 b0.15 a0.17 a0.16 a
Means with the same letter are not significant at p ≤ 0.01. The traits represent the germination percentage (GP), the germination rate (GR), the shoot length (SL1), the germination energy (GE), the root length (RL), the seedling length (SL2), the seedling vigor index (SVI), the root dry weight (RDW), the shoot dry weight (SDW1), the dry seedling weight (SDW2).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Taghvaei, M.; Maleki, H.; Najafi, S.; Hassani, H.S.; Danesh, Y.R.; Farda, B.; Pace, L. Using Chromosomal Abnormalities and Germination Traits for the Assessment of Tritipyrum Amphiploid Lines under Seed-Aging and Germination Priming Treatments. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129505

AMA Style

Taghvaei M, Maleki H, Najafi S, Hassani HS, Danesh YR, Farda B, Pace L. Using Chromosomal Abnormalities and Germination Traits for the Assessment of Tritipyrum Amphiploid Lines under Seed-Aging and Germination Priming Treatments. Sustainability. 2023; 15(12):9505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129505

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taghvaei, Mansour, Hamideh Maleki, Solmaz Najafi, Hossein Shahsavand Hassani, Younes Rezaee Danesh, Beatrice Farda, and Loretta Pace. 2023. "Using Chromosomal Abnormalities and Germination Traits for the Assessment of Tritipyrum Amphiploid Lines under Seed-Aging and Germination Priming Treatments" Sustainability 15, no. 12: 9505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129505

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop