Research on Sharing Behavior Strategy of Cultural Heritage Institutions Based on Evolutionary Game Theory

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The passage discusses the challenges faced by existing cultural heritage institutions in sharing information and data. These institutions have a low willingness to share, and data sharing is difficult due to various reasons. The text highlights the importance of encouraging more institutions to participate in the sharing platform as it can lead to value creation, improved competitiveness, and sustainable development of the cultural heritage sector.

To address the problem of selecting cultural heritage institutions for data sharing, the paper proposes an evolutionary game model using evolutionary game theory. The model aims to explore the system's evolutionary path, analyze the stability of equilibrium points, and conduct simulation experiments using MATLAB to validate the findings.

The research findings suggest that several factors can facilitate the sharing of cultural heritage institutions. These factors include increasing the penalty for non-sharing parties, enhancing the coefficient of synergistic benefit, increasing the data sharing volume, promoting data complementarity, and reducing the fixed sharing cost and the loss of gains for sharing parties.

 

Overall, the study indicates that implementing measures such as adjusting penalties and incentives, promoting data collaboration, and reducing costs can effectively promote the sharing of cultural heritage institutions and improve the overall sharing platform.

The passage discusses the challenges faced by existing cultural heritage institutions in sharing information and data. These institutions have a low willingness to share, and data sharing is difficult due to various reasons. The text highlights the importance of encouraging more institutions to participate in the sharing platform as it can lead to value creation, improved competitiveness, and sustainable development of the cultural heritage sector.

To address the problem of selecting cultural heritage institutions for data sharing, the paper proposes an evolutionary game model using evolutionary game theory. The model aims to explore the system's evolutionary path, analyze the stability of equilibrium points, and conduct simulation experiments using MATLAB to validate the findings.

The research findings suggest that several factors can facilitate the sharing of cultural heritage institutions. These factors include increasing the penalty for non-sharing parties, enhancing the coefficient of synergistic benefit, increasing the data sharing volume, promoting data complementarity, and reducing the fixed sharing cost and the loss of gains for sharing parties.

 

Overall, the study indicates that implementing measures such as adjusting penalties and incentives, promoting data collaboration, and reducing costs can effectively promote the sharing of cultural heritage institutions and improve the overall sharing platform.

 

Author Response

请参阅附件

Reviewer 2 Report

Figure 9 resolution should be increased.

There are problems with the positioning of the tables. Fix it.

The formulas are very complex to write. Formula numbering must be right-justified.

The work is very well planned and written. However, it is recommended to draw a flowchart that allows to briefly describe the study. It will make the article easier to understand.

Author Response

请参阅附件

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Please see the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Please see the attachment.

Author Response

请参阅附件

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 4 Report

El tema del artículo es interesante y de actualidad, el artículo tiene una buena estructura, pero recomiendo mejorar el resumen y tener en cuenta la siguiente estructura:

 

El resumen es analítico, es decir, debe incluir:

a. Tema

b. Pregunta

C. Justificación

d. Metodología

 

 

Las conclusiones deben tener mayor profundidad y contundencia y de acuerdo con el objetivo de la investigación, el documento menciona una sola conclusión.

 

 

 

Author Response

请参阅附件

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

1. Author should place more references as state of the art method in the second paragraph so that reader will understand the position of your study.

2. A justification, why author use the propose method should be addressed in the introduction, in last paragraph.

Title

The title is fine. It consist of object, purpose, method.

 

Abstract

a) You missed to write the conclusion sentence in your abstract. This to answer your proposed method

b) In the last sentence, you can add the implication of your work for your society

 

1. Introduction

a) This article has lack of references especially for the state of the art method. You should write more related reference that discussed the same study in the fourth paragraph, at leash 4-5 main references.

b) After you state the purpose of your study then you should make a justification what is the superior of your current study compared to previous studies.

 

2. Research Method

 (Part A. Literature Study) It sound a contrary procedure, in previous paragraph, you mention that you obtain this data from secondary data but in the other paragraph you said that you submitted an ethical clearence. Usually, if you used secondary data then you do not need to submitting the Ethical Clearenc procedure.

 

3. Results

You have mentioned the result completely.

 

4. Discussion

You should restructure your paragraph in the discussion section. Usually, in the discussion section, it consists of 1) interpretation of your result, 2) Comparison between yours and other studies, 3) you can tell the limitation of your work.

 

5. Conclusion

You should 1) re-state the purpose of your study in the beginning of the paragraph, 2) mention the main finding and other results.

 

 

 

1. Author should place more references as state of the art method in the second paragraph so that reader will understand the position of your study.

2. A justification, why author use the propose method should be addressed in the introduction, in last paragraph.

Title

The title is fine. It consist of object, purpose, method.

 

Abstract

a) You missed to write the conclusion sentence in your abstract. This to answer your proposed method

b) In the last sentence, you can add the implication of your work for your society

 

1. Introduction

a) This article has lack of references especially for the state of the art method. You should write more related reference that discussed the same study in the fourth paragraph, at leash 4-5 main references.

b) After you state the purpose of your study then you should make a justification what is the superior of your current study compared to previous studies.

 

2. Research Method

 (Part A. Literature Study) It sound a contrary procedure, in previous paragraph, you mention that you obtain this data from secondary data but in the other paragraph you said that you submitted an ethical clearence. Usually, if you used secondary data then you do not need to submitting the Ethical Clearenc procedure.

 

3. Results

You have mentioned the result completely.

 

4. Discussion

You should restructure your paragraph in the discussion section. Usually, in the discussion section, it consists of 1) interpretation of your result, 2) Comparison between yours and other studies, 3) you can tell the limitation of your work.

 

5. Conclusion

You should 1) re-state the purpose of your study in the beginning of the paragraph, 2) mention the main finding and other results.

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx