Next Article in Journal
Evolution in the Impact of Pro-Poor Policies on Farmers’ Confidence: Based on Age-Period-Cohort Analysis Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Identification and Prioritization of Green Lean Supply Chain Management Factors Using Fuzzy DEMATEL
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effect of Artificial Intelligence on the Development of China’s Wholesale and Retail Trade

Sustainability 2023, 15(13), 10524; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310524
by Lingxiang Jian, Shuxuan Guo * and Shengqing Yu
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2023, 15(13), 10524; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310524
Submission received: 27 May 2023 / Revised: 27 June 2023 / Accepted: 3 July 2023 / Published: 4 July 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This articles use neural methods to study IT in wholesale and retail industries in China. However, I rarely find any literature on countries other than China, and there is a whole lot of grammatical problem of missing out the connectives.

I think the authors should hire a native speaker to thoroughly review the article, conduct a more holistic literature review of how researchers in other countries have studied the application of IT in wholesale and retail industries, and explain why the year of 2021 was used as an illustration when China has experienced a nationwide lockdown that may have biased the results.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

see enclosed

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for all your precious feedback!

We have studied your comments carefully and have tried our best to revise our paper according to the comments, now we will respond point by point below. Our response is in red, and the revisions in the revised manuscript are highlighted. Please refer to the coverletter for detailed information.

We would like to express our great appreciation to you for comments on our paper. Thank you and best regards!

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

 

The article is interesting, well organized, it can be seen that it has been worked on and that it is the result of serious research.

Recommendations:

1. Theoretical Analysis of the Influence of AI on the high-quality development of WRT

-  I think that the theoretical analysis must be completed with studies that analyze the influence of AI in business. For example. Perifanis, N.-A.; Kitsios, F. Investigating the Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Business Value in the Digital Era of Strategy: A Literature Review. Information 2023, 14, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14020085 - I think it's a valuable source for documentation.

 

2. Materials and Methods

-  I don't think that the methods used need to be described in detail, pp. 4-6.

- 2.4. Data Source - I think it is necessary to describe more specifically the data series used.

 Also, I think you must have in References - the source of the data or at least of the institutions that made this data available (China statistical yearbooks, Provincial statistical yearbooks, China National Intellectual Property Administration, International Carbon Action Partnership Organization (ICAP), International Federation of Robots (IFR)). Even if the work refers to 30 regions of China, I think that a series of data used for at least one region can be exemplified.

- The source will be added to each Table/figure: "made by the authors" or another source.

- You need to introduce the Conclusions section, or reorganize the Discussion part. In Conclusions section, summarize the main results, if the work has certain limitations, what is the reason for these limitations, and what are the future research directions.

Thank you very much!

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for all your precious feedback!

We have studied your comments carefully and have tried our best to revise our paper according to the comments, now we will respond point by point below. Our response is in red, and the modifications in the revised manuscript are highlighted. Please refer to the coverletter for detailed information.

We would like to express our great appreciation to you for comments on our paper. Thank you and best regards!

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The reviewed manuscript is interesting and concerns a very topical issue. The Authors justified the undertaken research problem, formulated the goal, defined the research methods used, and presented the conclusions. Particularly interesting are the methods of data analysis. However, to improve the study, I propose minor changes and additions.

1. The basis of the research should be a literature review. Although the Authors, after justification, inserted a chapter entitled "Theoretical analysis of the impact of artificial intelligence on the development of high-quality WRT", they quoted only five literature items.

2. The study should clearly state the goal, which should also be presented in the summary. In this manuscript, the introduction states two different purposes of the article (lines 59-62 and 81-84).

3. It is good practice in scientific studies to formulate research hypotheses.

4. The manuscript has ended with a discussion, which is a summary. In the Discussion, reference should be made to the results of research by other authors. The article should end with conclusions practically already formulated in the Discussion. At the end of the study, it is also practiced to present recommendations for further research.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for all your precious feedback!

We have studied your comments carefully and have tried our best to revise our paper according to the comments, now we will respond point by point below. Our response is in red, and the revisions in the revised manuscript are highlighted. Please refer to the coverletter for detailed information.

We would like to express our great appreciation to you for comments on our paper. Thank you and best regards!

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Enclosed for comments on comments

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

See above

Author Response

Dear reviewer:

Thanks for your comments on our article again. We have directly revised the grammar problems and conjunctions you marked in the manuscript. On other issues, please refer to the cover letter for detailed information.

We would like to express our great appreciation to you for comments on our paper. Thank you and best regards!

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 3

Reviewer 1 Report

fine

et al. not et al

Author Response

Dear reviewer:

We have revised "et al" to "et al." in this article, thank you for your comments!

Back to TopTop