Next Article in Journal
Are the Barriers to Private Solar/Wind Investment in Vietnam Mainly Those That Limit Network Capacity Expansion?
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Regional Straw Utilization: Collaborative Approaches and Network Optimization
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of FDI on Environmental Degradation in Romania: Testing the Pollution Haven Hypothesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sod Culture with Vicia villosa Alters the Diversity of Fungal Communities in Walnut Orchards for Sustainability Development

1
Tibet Plateau Walnut Industry Research Institute, College of Horticulture and Gardening, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China
2
Wuhan Forest Resource Monitoring Center, Wuhan 430022, China
3
Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
4
Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
5
Hubei Academy of Forestry, Wuhan 430075, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(13), 10731; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310731
Submission received: 23 May 2023 / Revised: 30 June 2023 / Accepted: 5 July 2023 / Published: 7 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontier Research: Waste Management for Sustainable Development)

Abstract

:
Monoculture frequently causes loss of soil nutrients and the emergence of soil-borne diseases in walnut orchards, whereas it is unknown whether sod culture with Vicia villosa (a popular agroforestry system) in walnut orchards impacts the structural composition and diversity of soil fungal communities. Fungal communities in walnut orchards with the cover plant V. villosa were investigated in this work utilizing high-throughput sequencing of ITS, as well as examination of root arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and hyphal length of soil fungi. The monoculture and interplanted walnut models generated 33,511 and 34,620 effective tags with sequence similarity of 97%, respectively annotating 245 and 236 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Among these, a total of 158 OTUs were found to be shared across monoculture and interplanted orchards. Walnuts grown in monoculture had a total of 245 species, belonging to 245 genera and 36 phyla, while walnuts with V. villosa as cover crops had 236 species, belonging to 236 genera and 19 phyla. The application of V. villosa as a cover plant significantly increased 1-Simpson and Shannon indices of soil fungi, indicating that interplanting V. villosa promoted soil fungal community diversity. Three dominant fungal phyla were detected in the soil, with Glosseromycota being the most dominant phylum. V. villosa as a cover plant significantly reduced the abundance of Funneliformis and Densospora in the soil, while it significantly increased the colonization of native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in roots by 94%, along with a 39% significant decrease in mycorrhizal hyphal length, as compared with the monoculture. Overall, V. villosa as a cover plant alters the composition and diversity of the soil fungal community, with reduced Funneliformis (F. geosporum) and Densospora abundance, and increased mycorrhizal colonization rate in roots, contributing to the sustainable and high-quality development of walnuts.

1. Introduction

Walnut is a globally important economic tree species [1,2], rich in proteins, vitamins, and unsaturated fatty acids that are favourable to human health [3,4]. Walnut is frequently monocultured, with excessive use of chemical fertilizers and herbicides, resulting in poor soil environments that suppress soil microbial communities and yields [5]. Compared to monocultures, agroforestry systems can capture more resources like light and nutrients, as well as improve soil microbial populations. Bai et al. [6] reported that walnut–tea intercropping significantly and positively affected the abundance of fungal operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and thus increased host adaptability and growth. Mwakilili et al. [7] documented that maize–Desmodium intercropping increased the diversity of beneficial fungi in the soil and resulted in strong heterogeneity of the fungal microbiome. The intercropping of Morus alba and Lespedeza bicolor altered soil nitrogen levels as well as the homogeneity and diversity of fungal communities in plantation forests, thereby affecting soil carbon and nitrogen cycles [8].
Plants and soil environments interact with each other, and the number and species of rhizospheric soil microorganisms affect the uptake and transformation of soil nutrients by plants, thereby regulating plant growth, development, and health [9]. Successive monocultures increase soil-borne pathogen accumulation, along with reduced beneficial microorganisms [10,11], resulting in a severe reduction in plant productivity [12,13]. Arafat et al. [14] discovered that beneficial fungal species decreased and soil pathogenic microorganisms increased following years of long-term tea monoculture, leading to reduced tea yield. Fungi are an abundant and important group of soil microorganisms [15] that can function as plant symbionts, pathogens, and decomposers [16,17]. Among soil symbiotic fungi, many plant roots establish reciprocal relationships with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and ectomycorrhizal fungi [18], which aid in plant nutrient and water uptake [19]. Therefore, the composition and diversity of fungal communities in the soil can be important indicators of soil health and sustainability [20,21,22]. Walnut plants can form ectomycorrhizae as well as arbuscular mycorrhizae in their roots [23]. Mycorrhizae have been demonstrated to play critical roles in nutrient absorption and growth promotion of walnuts [24,25]. Moreover, walnut as a deep-rooted plant serves as a reservoir of AMF propagules for the restoration of surrounding vegetation [26]. In addition, in walnut agroforestry ecosystems, allelopathic substrates, such as juglone, can be transferred from walnut trees to their neighbouring plants via the common mycorrhizal network, thus inhibiting the growth of adjacent plants in the same ecosystem [27]. The variability of soil mycorrhizal fungi in walnut agroforestry systems is an important indicator of soil health in walnut orchards.
It is critical to maintain soil fertility and limit weed growth in orchards [28]. Orchard mulching has numerous ecological and economic benefits, including improved soil microbial abundance, decreased incidence of plant diseases and pests, reduced usage of pesticides and chemical fertilizers, and improved fruit quality and yield [29,30]. Leguminous crops are commonly used as cover crops in orchards to improve soil fertility, maintain soil moisture, and improve soil physicochemical properties [31,32], which may indirectly alter the diversity, activity, and community of microorganisms in the soil [32]. The intercropping of three green-manure crops changed the fungal community in apple orchards on the Loess Plateau, assisting in the optimisation of soil fungal community composition, thereby suppressing soil pathogens and promoting nutrient uptake by plants [33]. Many walnut orchards have successfully introduced cover crops, in which legumes and grasses can be employed as annuals or perennials, producing a positive impact on the orchard soil and eco-environment [34]. For example, sod culture in orchards can suppress rank weeds, prevent water and fertilizer loss, reduce the occurrence of pests and diseases, and improve soil physical and chemical properties and ecological environment, thereby achieving sustainable development of orchards [28,29,33].
Vicia villosa Roth. is a high-quality legume forage grass that has been widely used in sod culture of orchards because of its adaptability, nitrogen fixation, rapid decomposition and return to the soil as green manure, and the enrichment of beneficial microbes [35]. Jiang et al. [36] used V. villosa as a cover plant in apple orchards and found that the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria in the soil was increased, and the relative abundance of pathogenic fungi was decreased, thus improving the soil microenvironment in orchards. In China, the cover plant V. villosa has been used in walnut orchards, with positive impacts on soil fertility [35,37]. However, it is unclear how soil fungal populations change in the interplanted model, which is critical for understanding the high quality and productivity of walnuts grown in this manner. High-throughput sequencing of ITS was used in this study to analyse changes in the soil fungal community structure of walnut orchards after V. villosa was planted, as well as changes in root mycorrhizal colonization and soil mycelium length. The results are expected to provide a reference for future fungal (particularly AMF) management in walnut orchards with sod culture.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Location

This study was conducted at the Hubei Walnut Germplasm Repository (31°21′ N, 111°23′ E) in Yantang village, Chengguan town, Baokang county, Xiangyang, Hubei, China. The walnut variety ‘Qingxiang’ was used. The average annual rainfall was 934.6 mm and the average annual frost-free period was 240 days. The soil parent material was mostly mudstone type and carbonate type, and the soil was yellow-brown loam. The soil organic carbon content in the 0–10 cm layer of the study site was 14.62 g/kg, the alkaline nitrogen was 97.41 mg/kg, the Olsen-P was 22.20 mg/kg, and the available potassium was 169.01 mg/kg [35]. V. villosa was sown in rows in 2014.

2.2. Soil Sampling and Experimental Design

On April 15, 2019, four ‘Qingxiang’ walnut trees were chosen as experimental materials from the orchard planted with the cover crop V. villosa. In four directions under the canopy (1 m distant from the tree trunk) of each walnut, the top 0–5 cm of soil was removed and 5–10 cm of soil was collected and mixed well in all four directions for one sample. At the same time, four walnut trees without the cover crop treatment were employed as the controls. All samples were divided into two groups: one without any treatment was brought back to the laboratory for the analysis of root AMF colonization rate and soil hyphal length; the other was preserved on dry ice and used for fungal sequencing. Therefore, there were two treatments in this experiment: one for walnuts covered with V. villosa between rows (interplanted walnut), and the other for walnuts not covered with any crops as the control (monoculture walnut).

2.3. Determinations of Root AMF Colonization Rate and Soil Mycelial Length

Root mycorrhizal colonization rate was assessed according to the method described by Huang et al. [24]. The sampled roots were sliced into 1-cm segments and placed in 10% KOH solution at 95 °C for 2.5 h, incubated with 10% H2O2 solution for 15 min, acidified with 0.2 mol/L HCl for 15 min, stained with 0.05% trypan blue in lactophenol, and microscopically examined for mycorrhizal colonization. Here, 12 root segments were observed per tree, with a total of 96 root segments. Mycorrhizal colonization rate (%) = 100 × lengths of colonized root segments / total lengths of root segments detected. Soil mycelial length analysis was carried out in accordance with the method described by Bethlenfalvay and Ames [38].

2.4. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Illumina Sequencing

After genomic DNA extraction using the Dneasy PowerSoil kit (Qiagen, USA), the DNA was visualized using 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. PCR amplification was carried out using the diluted genomic DNA as a template, with specific primers of ITS1F (5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′) and ITS2R (5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′) with barcode based on the fungal ITS fragment sequencing region. The PCR procedure was as follows: 94 °C for 1 min, 30 cycles; 94 °C for 20 s, 48 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s; and 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were examined by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. The TruSeq DNA PCR-Free Sample Prep kit (FC-121-3001/3003) was used to create the library. After the library was constructed and qualified through quantification and library testing, sequencing was performed on the Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform in PE250 mode with the Illumina Hiseq Rapid SBS kit v2 (FC-402-4023 500 Cycle).

2.5. Data Analysis

To splice the double-ended sequences, FLASH was used for sequence processing. Each sample sequence was split from the reads based on Barcode. The raw data were achieved by truncating the Barcode sequences, and then quality control was performed using Trimmomatic to obtain valid Clean Reads. Based on Usearch (v7.1), the UPARSE algorithm was used to cluster OTUs at 97% consistency levels, selecting the sequence with the highest frequency of occurrence in each OTU as the representative sequence of the OTU. The UCLUST classification and the UNITE database were used for annotation analysis. Multiple alignment of representative sequences was performed using the FFT-NS-2 algorithm of MAFFT (v7). Community composition analysis, alpha diversity, beta diversity, and differential species analysis were analysed using R software (v2.15.3).
The data regarding root mycorrhizal colonization rate and soil mycelial length were analysed by analysis of variance using SAS software (v9.1.3), and significant differences between treatments were analysed using Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05), where root mycorrhizal colonization rate was arcsine-transformed prior to the analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Changes in Sequencing Data and OTUs

According to the ITS sequencing data, the numbers of spliced sequences obtained from monoculture walnuts and interplanted walnuts were 35,184 and 36,315, respectively (Table 1). After filtering the chimeras, the final number of valid sequences obtained were 33,511 and 34,620, respectively, in the monoculture walnut and interplanted walnut, with effective rates of 92.01% and 90.28%, respectively. The average length of valid sequences was 258 bp for both treatments.
Rarefaction curves can reflect the abundance of species in a sample in an indirect way. When the rarefaction curve of the samples levelled off, it suggested that the amount of sequencing data was sufficient and the sequencing results basically reflected all species in the walnut rhizosphere. The rarefaction curve (Figure 1a) clearly showed that after 12,500 sequences, the number of OTUs for ITS stabilized at 97% similarity. There were 245 OTUs in the monoculture walnut sample and 236 OTUs in the interplanted walnut, for a total of 323 OTUs in the two treatment samples, including 158 OTUs in both monoculture walnut and interplanted walnut (Figure 1b). The use of V. villosa as a cover crop in the walnut orchard reduced the number of fungal OTUs, resulting in a shift in the distribution of soil fungal community composition.
Based on the annotated OTUs, the monoculture mode had 245 species, belonging to 245 genera and 36 phyla; the interplanted mode had 236 species, affiliated with 236 genera and 19 phyla (Table 2).

3.2. Changes in the Structural Composition of Soil Fungal Communities at the Phylum, Genus, and Species Level

The dominant species in two treatments of walnut soil samples belonged to the Glomeromycota, Mucoromycota, and Ascomycota, according to phylum taxonomic analysis of soil fungal community composition (Figure 2a). Glomeromycota had average relative abundance of nearly 100% in all groups of soil and was the most dominant phylum in the interplanted walnut. In addition, the cover plant V. villosa in the walnut orchard reduced the abundance of Mucoromycota by 99%, compared to the monoculture walnut.
Similarly, the structural composition of soil fungal communities changed significantly at the class, order, family, genus, and species level (Figure 2b,c; Supplementary Material Figure S1). The community composition of soil fungi in the walnut orchard was analysed at the genus level, with Funneliformis, Densospora, Symbiotaphrina, and Preussia being the dominant fungi in the two groups of soil samples (Figure 2b). Compared with monoculture walnut, the interplanted walnut significantly reduced the abundance of Funneliformis and Densospora, with Funneliformis decreasing by 96%. In Funneliformis, F. geosporum abundance was obviously reduced by 96% under intercropped versus monoculture walnut conditions (Figure 2c).
Cluster analysis of the dominant fungi in both monoculture walnut and interplanted walnut at the genus level showed that the distribution of fungal community structure was similar within the same group, while there were significant differences in the distribution of fungal community structure between the groups. Preussia and Symbiotaphrina were more abundant in the interplanted walnut sample and less abundant than in the monoculture walnut sample, but Funneliformis and Densospora were more abundant in the monoculture walnut than in the interplanted walnut (Figure 2d).

3.3. Changes in the Diversity of Soil Fungal Communities

Alpha diversity of fungi can reflect the abundance, homogeneity, and diversity of fungal communities. The results showed that the 1-Simpson (Figure 3b) and Shannon (Figure 3c) index of the soil fungi was higher in the interplanted walnuts than in the monoculture walnuts, with no difference in the Chao1 (Figure 3a) index between the two treatments. This indicated that the cover plant V. villosa increased the alpha diversity of fungi in the walnut orchard.
Beta diversity of fungi gives an indication of fungal community structure. A principal component analysis (PCA) of the fungal composition of walnut soils showed that PC1 and PC2 contributed 63.7% and 26.9%, respectively, with a total contribution of 90.6% (Figure 3d). PC1 clearly distinguished between the monoculture walnut and the interplanted walnut groups. The four samples from the monoculture walnut treatment clustered together, indicating that the fungal community composition within the group was similar. In contrast, the high dispersion between the four samples from the interplanted walnut indicated significant changes in fungal community structure (Figure 3e). These results suggest that V. villosa as a cover crop had a high degree of variability on the soil fungal community structure of walnut orchards. At the taxonomic unit level of genus, a random forest analysis of soil fungi revealed that Densospora and Funneliformis differed significantly between the two groups, with a greater influence of Densospora on the grouping (Figure 3f).

3.4. Changes in Mycorrhizal Fungal Growth in Soil and Roots

A good symbiotic association could be developed between walnut roots and native AMF (Figure 4a), with root AMF colonization rate of 38.67% and 75.12% in monoculture and interplanted walnut groups, respectively (Figure 4b). The cover plant V. villosa significantly promoted walnut root AMF colonization rate by 94%, compared to the monoculture. A large number of mycorrhizal hyphae existed in the rhizosphere of walnuts (Figure 4c), with soil hyphal length ranging from 3.41–5.60 cm/g (Figure 4d). Soil hyphal length was significantly reduced by 39%, after planting the cover plant V. villosa compared to the monoculture walnut.

4. Discussion

High-throughput sequencing techniques can provide detailed insights into the composition and dynamics of soil microbial communities and have become a prominent way for studying microbial community diversity [39], with ITS sequencing being widely used for fungal taxonomy [40]. In this study, high-throughput sequencing of ITS was performed on soils from walnut orchards in monoculture and from walnut orchards interplanted with the cover crop V. villosa to elucidate the effect of agroforestry systems on soil fungal diversity in walnut orchards. The sequencing demonstrated that V. villosa as a cover plant altered the fungal community composition of walnut orchards and enriched the fungal community diversity of soils, which was consistent with the results of Qin et al. [41] in the soil fungal community of cucumber intercropped with watercress. Studies have demonstrated that V. villosa promoted soil fungal diversity and improved soil quality [42]. According to the findings of Qian et al. [33], white clover as a cover plant in apple orchards improved the diversity, richness, and relative abundance of soil beneficial fungi and specific fungal genera. In our study, sod culture dramatically reduced soil fungi at the genus and species level, as compared with monoculture, which may be due to the toxic effect of juglone released by walnut roots on soil fungi [43]. The results of PCA showed that the fungal communities in the interplanted walnut differed significantly from those in monoculture forests. The fungal diversity of the four samples in the interplanted walnut was quite discrete, indicating that the effect of V. villosa as a cover plant on soil fungi in walnut orchards was variable.
Sod culture in orchards increases total and soluble organic carbon concentrations of the soil, thus altering the abundance and diversity of fungi in the soil [44]. Mulching in hazelnut orchards improved soil physicochemical conditions, resulting in reduced pathogenic fungi and increased symbiotic fungi [45]. Similarly, long-term sod culture also changed the soil fungal community composition of Chinese hickory orchards, with increasing the relative abundance of Ascomycota, lowering the relative abundance of Basidiomycota, and changing the dominant genus in the soil [46]. The results of the high-throughput ITS sequencing data also showed that V. villosa, as a cover plant, had an effect on soil fungi of walnut orchards at different taxonomic levels. At the phylum level, Glomeromycota exhibited the highest relative abundance in the interplanted walnut, while Mucoromycota had a lower abundance. Glomeromycota are known to be associated with mycorrhizal fungi in the soil, and they can colonize about 80% of terrestrial plants to establish mycorrhizae that help plants obtain nutrients and water [47]. Mucoromycota can establish a variety of beneficial or pathogenic associations with their hosts [48]. The use of V. villosa as a cover plant in walnut orchards lowered the similarity in soil fungal community composition and considerably reduced the abundance of Funneliformis (a group of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) and Densospora (a group of ectomycorrhizal fungi) in the soil. In addition, native AMF could colonize roots of walnut, with fungal colonization rates of 38.67% and 75.12% in monoculture and intercropped walnut trees, respectively. The colonization of indigenous AMF was observed in walnuts in Linxiang, Yunnan, China, with an AMF colonization rate of 80.67% [49]. The variability in mycorrhizal colonization rates between our study and the study by Mao et al. [49] could be attributed to the fact that root AMF colonization rate is influenced by a variety of factors such as soil conditions, environmental factors, management practices, and tree age [50]. Interplanting V. villosa promoted the colonization of beneficial AMF on walnut roots. Similarly, Wang et al. [51] also reported an increase in root mycorrhizal colonization of citrus trees after sod culture with white clover. However, interplanting V. villosa also dramatically reduced soil hyphal length, as compared with the monoculture walnuts, which may be related to the high dispersion of soil fungi induced by V. villosa. In addition, interplanting V. villosa also reduced the relative abundance of Funneliformis. Both Funneliformis and Densospora are beneficial root-associated fungi that form mycorrhizae with plant roots. They may form a dense underground common mycorrhizal network in the soil between plants that contribute to plant water and nutrient uptake [52]. Indeed, legumes (e.g., V. villosa) require large amounts of phosphorus for nitrogen fixation, and mycorrhizal fungi are prominent in promoting P uptake by the host [30]. Thus, in walnut intercropped with V. villosa, more mycorrhizal fungi were enriched in the intercropped plants than in the walnut rhizosphere. Another study conducted by He et al. [53] also showed that V. villosa could be colonized by AMF, with a higher root colonization rate in V. villosa (78%) than in walnuts (57%). Therefore, mycorrhizal fungi such as Funneliformis and Densospora may heavily colonize roots of V. villosa, resulting in a reduction in the walnut rhizosphere. Draghi et al. [54] also confirmed that in sustainable agricultural systems, V. villosa as a cover plant was able to recruit root-associated beneficial microorganisms, such as Burkholderia spp., in its roots, contributing to the dominance of beneficial microorganisms for subsequent crop growth. In such intercropping pattern of walnut, mycorrhizal fungi also increased root colonization rate of walnut, thus reducing the abundance of mycorrhizal fungi in the soil. The present study only analysed the changes in soil AMF, and more research is needed in conjunction with mycorrhizal fungal diversity in walnut roots as well as in roots of intercrops. Mycorrhizal fungi from the roots of V. villosa can be released into the walnut root environment after the senescence of V. villosa in summer, which is helpful for walnut growth and hence the sustainability of walnuts.
Interplanted walnuts reduce abundance of soil Funneliformis, resulting in a decrease in soil mycorrhizal hyphae. In turn, this appears to cause more Funneliformis to colonize walnut or V. villosa roots, leading to an increased rate of root mycorrhizal colonization, which benefits the growth and nutrient absorption of walnut [23,24,25], thus encouraging sustainable production of walnut. Furthermore, sod culture in orchards also improved soil fertility, thereby reducing nitrogen fertilizer inputs [55]. However, the effect of sod culture on soil microbes would exhibit distinct differences with the growth period of fruit trees [36]. Therefore, an in-depth study of the composition and diversity of soil fungal communities in the interplanted model is useful for elucidating the V. villosa–AMF–walnut interactions and assessing soil productivity, health, and sustainability in walnut orchards.

5. Conclusions

Interplanting V. villosa in walnut orchards increased the diversity and changed community composition of soil fungal populations in walnut orchards, but reduced the abundance of Funneliformis and Densospora, with F. geosporum reducing rapidly. One of the reasons for the decrease in mycorrhizal fungi in the walnut rhizosphere is the increased accumulation of mycorrhizal fungi in roots, which ensures the long-term sustainable production of walnut. The changes in the soil fungal population and diversity caused more AMF to colonize roots after sod culture with V. villosa, which is beneficial to the growth of walnut and the reduction of fertilizer inputs in orchards, as well as building a good microenvironment for the soil to achieve sustainable development of the orchard.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su151310731/s1, Figure S1. The relative abundance of fungal communities at the class (a), order (b), and family (c) level in different walnut orchards.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.-S.W.; data curation, W.-X.H. and Q.-F.S.; methodology, W.-X.H.; resources, Q.-S.W. and Y.-J.X.; supervision, Q.-S.W.; writing—original draft preparation, W.-X.H.; writing—review and editing, A.H., E.F.A., Y.-J.X. and Q.-S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Hubei Province ‘14th Five-Year’ Major Science and Technology Aid Tibet project (SCXX-XZCG-22016). The authors are grateful to their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP2023R356), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are included in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP2023R356), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, M.; Li, C.; Cao, C.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Che, J.; Yang, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, H.; He, G.; et al. Walnut fruit processing equipment: Academic insights and perspectives. Food Eng. Rev. 2021, 13, 822–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zareef, M.; Arslan, M.; Hassan, M.M.; Ali, S.; Ouyang, Q.; Li, H.; Wu, X.; Hashim, M.M.; Javaria, S.; Chen, Q. Application of benchtop NIR spectroscopy coupled with multivariate analysis for rapid prediction of antioxidant properties of walnut (Juglans regia). Food Chem. 2021, 359, 129928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kalogiouri, N.P.; Manousi, N.; Rosenberg, E.; Zachariadis, G.A.; Paraskevopoulou, A.; Samanidou, V. Exploring the volatile metabolome of conventional and organic walnut oils by solid-phase microextraction and analysis by GC-MS combined with chemometrics. Food Chem. 2021, 363, 130331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, W.; Pu, X.; Sun, J.; Shi, X.; Cheng, W.; Wang, B. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum on functional characteristics and flavor profile of fermented walnut milk. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 160, 113254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xue, L.; Ren, H.; Brodribb, T.J.; Wang, J.; Yao, X.; Li, S. Long term effects of management practice intensification on soil microbial community structure and co-occurrence network in a non-timber plantation. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 459, 117805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bai, Y.C.; Li, B.X.; Xu, C.Y.; Raza, M.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Q.Z.; Fu, Y.N.; Hu, J.Y.; Imoulan, A.; Hussain, M.; et al. Intercropping walnut and tea: Effects on soil nutrients, enzyme activity, and microbial communities. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 852342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mwakilili, A.D.; Mwaikono, K.S.; Herrera, S.L.; Midega, C.A.; Magingo, F.; Alsanius, B.; Dekker, T.; Lyantagaye, S.L. Long-term maize-Desmodium intercropping shifts structure and composition of soil microbiome with stronger impact on fungal communities. Plant Soil 2021, 467, 437–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, J.; Wei, Y.; Du, H.; Zhu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Yin, Y. Effects of intercropping between Morus alba and nitrogen fixing species on soil microbial community structure and diversity. Forests 2022, 13, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gao, Z.; Han, M.; Hu, Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, C.; Wang, X.; Tian, Q.; Jiao, W.; Hu, J.; Liu, L.; et al. Effects of continuous cropping of sweet potato on the fungal community structure in rhizospheric soil. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alami, M.M.; Xue, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhu, D.; Abbas, A.; Gong, Z.; Wang, X. Structure, function, diversity, and composition of fungal communities in rhizospheric soil of Coptis chinensis Franch under a successive cropping system. Plants 2020, 9, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wu, H.; Yan, W.; Wu, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Rensing, C.; Lin, W. Consecutive monoculture regimes differently affected the diversity of the rhizosphere soil viral community and accumulated soil-borne plant viruses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022, 337, 108076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shen, Z.; Penton, C.R.; Lv, N.; Xue, C.; Yuan, X.; Ruan, Y.; Li, R.; Shen, Q. Banana Fusarium wilt disease incidence is influenced by shifts of soil microbial communities under different monoculture spans. Microb. Ecol. 2018, 75, 739–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wu, H.; Wu, H.; Jiao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Rensing, C.; Lin, W. The combination of biochar and PGPBs stimulates the differentiation in rhizosphere soil microbiome and metabolites to suppress soil-borne pathogens under consecutive monoculture regimes. GCB Bioenergy 2022, 14, 84–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Arafat, Y.; Tayyab, M.; Khan, M.U.; Chen, T.; Amjad, H.; Awais, S.; Lin, X.; Lin, W.; Lin, S. Long-term monoculture negatively regulates fungal community composition and abundance of tea orchards. Agronomy 2019, 9, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Wang, Y.; Pan, F.; Wang, Q.; Luo, J.; Zhang, Q.; Pan, Y.; Wu, C.; Liu, W. The effect of different remediation treatments on soil fungal communities in rare earth tailings soil. Forests 2022, 13, 1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Arafat, Y.; Lin, W. Studies on fungal communities and functional guilds shift in tea continuous cropping soils by high-throughput sequencing. Ann. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ye, G.; Lin, Y.; Luo, J.; Di, H.J.; Lindsey, S.; Liu, D.; Fan, J.; Ding, W. Responses of soil fungal diversity and community composition to long-term fertilization: Field experiment in an acidic Ultisol and literature synthesis. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 145, 103305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Zou, Y.N.; Shu, B.; Wu, Q.S. Deciphering molecular mechanisms regarding enhanced drought tolerance in plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 308, 111591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Carron, A.I.; Garibaldi, L.A.; Marquez, S.; Fontenla, S. The soil fungal community of native woodland in Andean Patagonian forest: A case study considering experimental forest management and seasonal effects. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 461, 117955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Odelade, K.A.; Babalola, O.O. Bacteria, fungi and archaea domains in rhizospheric soil and their effects in enhancing agricultural productivity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Shen, Q.; Yang, J.; Su, D.; Li, Z.; Xiao, W.; Wang, Y.; Cui, X. Comparative analysis of fungal diversity in rhizospheric soil from wild and reintroduced Magnolia sinica estimated via high-throughput sequencing. Plants 2020, 9, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ali, I.; Yuan, P.; Ullah, S.; Iqbal, A.; Zhao, Q.; Liang, H.; Khan, A.; Imran; Zhang, H.; Wu, X.; et al. Biochar amendment and nitrogen fertilizer contribute to the changes in soil properties and microbial communities in a Paddy field. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 834751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, W.Y.; Wu, Q.S.; Xu, Y.J.; Kuča, K. Exploring mycorrhizal fungi in walnut with a focus on physiological roles. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobo. 2021, 49, 12363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, G.M.; Zou, Y.N.; Wu, Q.S.; Xu, Y.J.; Kuča, K. Mycorrhizal roles in plant growth, gas exchange, root morphology, and nutrient uptake of walnuts. Plant Soil Environ. 2020, 66, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zou, Y.N.; Xu, Y.J.; Liu, R.C.; Huang, G.M.; Kuča, K.; Srivastava, A.K.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Wu, Q.S. Two different strategies of Diversispora spurca-inoculated walnut seedlings to improve leaf P acquisition at low and moderate P levels. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1140467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mortier, E.; Lamotte, O.; Martin-Laurent, F.; Recorbet, G. Forty years of study on interactions between walnut tree and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 40, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Achatz, M.; Rillig, M.C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal hyphae enhance transport of the allelochmical juglone in the field. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 78, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Webber, S.M.; Bailey, A.P.; Huxley, T.; Potts, S.G.; Lukac, M. Traditional and cover crop-derived mulches enhance soil ecosystem services in apple orchards. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 178, 104569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, R.; Cao, B.; Sun, Q.; Song, L. Response of grass interplanting on bacterial and fungal communities in a jujube orchard in Ningxia, northwest China. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xiao, L.; Lai, S.; Chen, M.; Long, X.; Fu, X.; Yang, H. Effects of grass cultivation on soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community in a tangerine orchard. Rhizosphere 2022, 24, 100583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cloutier, M.L.; Murrell, E.; Barbercheck, M.; Kaye, J.; Finney, D.; García-González, I.; Bruns, M.A. Fungal community shifts in soils with varied cover crop treatments and edaphic properties. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ding, T.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, W.; Duan, T. Green manure crops affected soil chemical properties and fungal diversity and community of apple orchard in the Loess Plateau of China. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nut. 2021, 21, 1089–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qian, Y.L.; Wang, X.Z.; Lai, X.F.; Li, J.C.; Shen, Y.Y. Effects of perennial forage on characteristics of the soil fungal community in an apple orchard. Acta Pratac. Sin. 2019, 28, 124–132. [Google Scholar]
  34. Grant, J.; Anderson, K.K.; Prichard, T.; Bugg, R.L.; Thomas, F.; Johnson, T. Cover Crops for Walnut Orchards, 1st ed.; UCANR Publications: Davis, CA, USA, 2006; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  35. Xu, Y.J.; Fu, Y.N.; Chen, Y.X.; Xu, C.Y.; Liao, S.; Wang, Q.Z.; Xu, C.Y. Decomposition dynamics and nutrient release of Vicia villosa in walnut forest. J. Inner Mongolia Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2022, 43, 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jiang, L.L.; Sun, R.H.; Zhang, G.Y.; Gong, Q.T.; Wu, H.B.; Du, X.K. Effects of Vicia villosa Roth cultivation on soil microbial community structure in apple orchards. Acta Agric. Boreali Sin. 2022, 37, 291–299. [Google Scholar]
  37. Guo, Y.; Nie, C.J.; Xiang, Y.Z.; Xu, H.; Liu, X.; Zeng, H.; Li, C. Effect of different agroferestry patterns on soil fertility in Juglans region Orchards. Chin. J. Soil Sci. 2016, 47, 391–397. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bethlenfalvay, G.J.; Ames, R.N. Comparison of two methods for quantifying extraradical mycelium of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1987, 51, 834–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Q.; Wang, C.; Xiang, X.; Xu, H.; Han, G. Analysis of microbial diversity and succession during Xiaoqu Baijiu fermentation using high-throughput sequencing technology. Eng. Life Sci. 2022, 22, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, F.; Yang, D.; Liu, S.; Xu, S.; Wang, F.; Chen, H.; Liu, Y. Use of high-throughput sequencing to identify fungal communities on the surface of citri reticulatae pericarpium during the 3-year aging process. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 3142–3151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Qin, L.J.; Yu, T.T.; Wang, J.M.; Gao, Y.B.; Wang, S.Z.; Li, Z.; Yun, X.F. Soil fungal ITS diversity in cucumber-celery intercropping. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2019, 27, 529–536. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Yang, J.; Duan, Y.; Luo, Y.; Taherzadeh, M.J.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Awasthi, M.K.; Zhao, Z. The diversity of microbial community and function varied in response to different agricultural residues composting. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 715, 136983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mahoney, N.; Molyneux, R.J.; Campbell, B.C. Regulation of aflatoxin production by naphthoquinones of walnut (Juglans regia). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 4418–4421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, Y.P.; Mao, Y.F.; Hu, Y.L.; Zhang, L.L.; Yin, Y.J.; Pang, H.l.; Su, X.F.; Yang, L.; Shen, X. Effects of grass planting in apple orchard on soil microbial diversity, enzyme activities and carbon components. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil. 2021, 27, 1792–1805. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ma, W.; Yang, Z.; Hou, S.; Ma, Q.; Liang, L.; Wang, G.; Liang, C.; Zhao, T. Effects of living cover on the soil microbial communities and ecosystem functions of hazelnut orchards. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 652493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hu, Y.B.; Liang, C.F.; Jin, J.; Wang, X.X.; Ye, Z.H.; Wu, J.S. Effects of long-term sod cultivation on chinese hickory plantation soil fungal community and enzyme activities. Environ. Sci. 2023, 44, 2945–2954. [Google Scholar]
  47. Naranjo-Ortiz, M.A.; Gabaldón, T. Fungal evolution: Major ecological adaptations and evolutionary transitions. Biol. Rev. 2019, 94, 1443–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Bonfante, P.; Venice, F. Mucoromycota: Going to the roots of plant-interacting fungi. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2020, 34, 100–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mao, J.H.; Li, R.B.; Jing, Y.B.; Ning, D.L.; Li, Y.P.; Chen, H.Y. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with walnut trees and their effect on seedling growth. J. Forest Environ. 2022, 42, 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  50. Xiang, D.; Veresoglou, S.D.; Rillig, M.C.; Xu, T.; Li, H.; Hao, Z.; Chen, B. Relative importance of individual climatic drivers shaping arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 72, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, P.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Q.S. Effects of soil tillage and planting grass on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal propagules and soil properties in citrus orchards in southeast China. Soil Tillage Res. 2016, 155, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wu, Q.S.; Zhang, Y.C.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Srivastava, A.K. Underground communication of root hormones by common mycorrhizal network between trifoliate orange and white clover. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2017, 63, 1187–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. He, W.X.; Wu, Q.S.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Muthuramalingam, P.; Al-Arjani, A.-B.F.; Zou, Y.N. Effects of symbiotic fungi on sugars and soil fertility and structure-mediated changes in plant growth of Vicia villosa. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Draghi, W.O.; Alvarez, F.; Russo, D.M.; Lagares, A.; Wall, L.G.; Zorreguieta, A. Root-associated Burkholderia spp. on the hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.) cover crop vary depending on soil history of use. Rhizosphere 2021, 17, 100297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pott, L.P.; Amado, T.J.C.; Schwalbert, R.A.; Gebert, F.H.; Reimche, G.B.; Pes, L.Z.; Ciampitti, I.A. Effect of hairy vetch cover crop on maize nitrogen supply and productivity at varying yield environments in Southern Brazil. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 759, 144313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Rarefaction curves (a) and Venn diagram depicting the numbers and percentages of fungi (b) in different walnut orchards. See Table 1 for abbreviations.
Figure 1. Rarefaction curves (a) and Venn diagram depicting the numbers and percentages of fungi (b) in different walnut orchards. See Table 1 for abbreviations.
Sustainability 15 10731 g001
Figure 2. Relative abundance of fungal communities with high abundance at the phylum (a), genus (b) and species (c) level in different walnut orchards, along with a heatmap (d) of soil fungal community composition at the genus level. See Table 1 for abbreviations.
Figure 2. Relative abundance of fungal communities with high abundance at the phylum (a), genus (b) and species (c) level in different walnut orchards, along with a heatmap (d) of soil fungal community composition at the genus level. See Table 1 for abbreviations.
Sustainability 15 10731 g002
Figure 3. Alpha diversity index of fungal community richness (Chao1) (a) and diversity (1-Simpson and Shannon) (b,c) in different walnut orchards, as well as principal component analysis (d), weighted unifrac clustering analysis (e), and random forest analysis (f). *: p < 0.05, ns: p > 0.05. See Table 1 for abbreviations.
Figure 3. Alpha diversity index of fungal community richness (Chao1) (a) and diversity (1-Simpson and Shannon) (b,c) in different walnut orchards, as well as principal component analysis (d), weighted unifrac clustering analysis (e), and random forest analysis (f). *: p < 0.05, ns: p > 0.05. See Table 1 for abbreviations.
Sustainability 15 10731 g003
Figure 4. Changes in AMF colonization and soil hyphae of walnuts after planting V. villosa. (a) AMF colonization of walnut roots; (b) changes in AMF colonization rate; (c) soil mycorrhizal hyphae of walnut; (d) changes in rhizosphere soil hyphal length. Data (means ± SE, n = 4) with different letters above the bars indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences. Abbreviations: Ih, intraradical hyphae; Iw, interplanted walnut; Mw, monoculture walnut; V, vesicle; Sh, soil hyphae.
Figure 4. Changes in AMF colonization and soil hyphae of walnuts after planting V. villosa. (a) AMF colonization of walnut roots; (b) changes in AMF colonization rate; (c) soil mycorrhizal hyphae of walnut; (d) changes in rhizosphere soil hyphal length. Data (means ± SE, n = 4) with different letters above the bars indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences. Abbreviations: Ih, intraradical hyphae; Iw, interplanted walnut; Mw, monoculture walnut; V, vesicle; Sh, soil hyphae.
Sustainability 15 10731 g004
Table 1. Data statistics of fungus communities in different treatment walnut fields.
Table 1. Data statistics of fungus communities in different treatment walnut fields.
TreatmentsRaw TagsEffective TagsEffective Rates (%)Average Length (bp)
Mw35,18433,51192.01258
Iw36,31534,62090.28258
Abbreviations: Mw, monoculture walnut; Iw, interplanted walnut.
Table 2. Results of OTU annotation of fungi in different walnut orchards.
Table 2. Results of OTU annotation of fungi in different walnut orchards.
TreatmentsKingdomPhylumClassOrderFamilyGenusSpecies
Mw3436244245245245245
Iw1819234236236236236
See Table 1 for abbreviations.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, W.-X.; Sun, Q.-F.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Wu, Q.-S.; Xu, Y.-J. Sod Culture with Vicia villosa Alters the Diversity of Fungal Communities in Walnut Orchards for Sustainability Development. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10731. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310731

AMA Style

He W-X, Sun Q-F, Hashem A, Abd_Allah EF, Wu Q-S, Xu Y-J. Sod Culture with Vicia villosa Alters the Diversity of Fungal Communities in Walnut Orchards for Sustainability Development. Sustainability. 2023; 15(13):10731. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310731

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Wan-Xia, Qiao-Feng Sun, Abeer Hashem, Elsayed Fathi Abd_Allah, Qiang-Sheng Wu, and Yong-Jie Xu. 2023. "Sod Culture with Vicia villosa Alters the Diversity of Fungal Communities in Walnut Orchards for Sustainability Development" Sustainability 15, no. 13: 10731. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310731

APA Style

He, W. -X., Sun, Q. -F., Hashem, A., Abd_Allah, E. F., Wu, Q. -S., & Xu, Y. -J. (2023). Sod Culture with Vicia villosa Alters the Diversity of Fungal Communities in Walnut Orchards for Sustainability Development. Sustainability, 15(13), 10731. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310731

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop