Modelling the Coupling Relationship between Urban Road Spatial Structure and Traffic Flow
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- How can the feature parameters of spatial syntax in the urban planning stage be effectively combined with the traffic flow parameters in the road traffic operation stage so as to achieve mutual support and coordinated development between the two?
- (2)
- What is the inherent coupling mechanism between the two? How can we extract the key factors and describe them quantitatively through analysis of this mechanism?
- (3)
- Based on this coupling mechanism, how can we construct a mathematical model between the two parameters in order to provide strong theoretical support for road traffic system planning?
- (4)
- How can we use this mathematical model to provide a new applied perspective and practical method for traffic flow analysis in the urban planning stage?
- (1)
- To reveal the intrinsic connection and coupling mechanism between the feature parameters of spatial syntax in the urban planning stage and the traffic flow parameters in the road traffic operation stage;
- (2)
- To construct mathematical models to effectively combine these two indicators and provide a theoretical basis for the optimal planning of road traffic systems;
- (3)
- To expand the methods of traffic flow analysis in the urban planning stage, provide new application perspectives and practical tools and help to realize the synergistic development of traffic operation and planning;
- (4)
- To provide support to improve the level of road traffic system planning, optimize urban planning and design and further improve the travel experience and quality of life of urban residents through professional research.
2. Literature Review
3. Construction of Spatial Syntactic Model
3.1. Fundamentals of Spatial Syntax
3.2. Morphological Variables of Spatial Syntax
3.3. Construction of the Abstract Road Network of the Study Area
4. Construction of Coupling Relationship Model
4.1. Integration Degree Analysis of Abstract Road Network
4.2. Intelligence Degree Analysis of Abstract Road Network
4.3. Coupling Characteristic Analysis of Integration and Traffic Flow Characteristic Parameters
4.3.1. Selection of Traffic Flow Characteristic Parameters
4.3.2. Data Sources and Processing Methods
4.3.3. Coupling Characteristic Analysis of Integration and Saturation
4.4. Model Analysis of the Relationship between Integration and Saturation Coupling
Model Analysis of the Relationship between Integration and Saturation
4.5. Decision of Threshold of Integration
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The spatial structure of the road network and traffic flow show a coupled relationship. The coupling pattern in the core area is different from that in the peripheral area. In the core area, the integration of segments is high, with excessive saturation in these segments with an increase in the OD demand, followed by stable saturation. In the peripheral regions, the integration of segments remains minimal, and the saturation of these segments gradually increases. However, when the OD demand becomes significantly high, the saturation in the peripheral areas may surpass that in the core area. Therefore, a dense road network is reasonable in the core area, and high capacity is important in the peripheral area.
- (2)
- When the saturation of the road network is low, for example, less than 0.75, as in this paper, the relationship between integration and saturation is not obvious. When the saturation of the road network is high, for example, between 0.75 and 0.9, as in this paper, the relationship between integration and saturation is evident. Therefore, in the traffic planning stage, high OD demand should be used to test the toughness of the road network.
- (3)
- When the saturation of the road network takes different values, the theoretical models between integration and saturation are different. Among these models, the linear model has the best fit. The linear model discovers the nature of the relationship between integration and saturation, and according to the model, the threshold of integration for one segment can be obtained. This threshold can supply the critical value of integration for traffic planning.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pi, M.; Yeon, H.; Son, H.; Jang, Y. Visual Cause Analytics for Traffic Congestion. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021, 27, 2186–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.; Kim, Y.; Jin, S.M.; Kim, D.; Ko, S. A Visual Analytics System for Exploring, Monitoring, and Forecasting Road Traffic Congestion. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2019, 26, 3133–3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terraza, M.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z. Intersection Signal Timing Optimisation for an Urban Street Network to Minimise Traffic Delays. Promet-Traffic Transp. 2021, 33, 579–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zang, X. Theoretical threshold of travel time for travel time reliability from probabilistic measures. Transp.-Transp. Dyn. 2021, 10, 68–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, Y.; Xu, M.; Li, J.; Zuylen, H.V. Determining the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram from Mixed and Partial Traffic Data. Promet-Traffic Transp. 2018, 30, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, W.; Wong, S.C.; Liu, H.X. Network topological effects on the macroscopic fundamental Diagram. Transp. B Transp. Dyn. 2021, 9, 376–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Hu, T.; Gao, F.; Wu, R.; Guo, W.; Zhu, X. A hybrid data-driven framework for spatiotemporal traffic flow data imputation. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 16343–16352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.; Li, W.; Zheng, W.; Dong, C.; Wang, S.; Chen, Q. Lane-level heterogeneous traffic flow prediction: A spatiotemporal attention-based encoder–decoder model. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 2023, 15, 51–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Han, X.; Xu, X. Traffic flow prediction model based on the combination of improved gated recurrent unit and graph convolutional network. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 804454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, T.; Liu, K.; Liang, C. An improved cellular automata traffic flow model considering driving styles. Sustainability 2023, 15, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, Y.; Mao, S.; Zhang, Y. A traffic flow model considering influence of car-following and its echo characteristics. Nonlinear Dyn. 2017, 89, 1099–1109. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Haghani, A. Fractional time-varying grey traffic flow model based on viscoelastic fluid and its application. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2022, 157, 149–174. [Google Scholar]
- Lilhore, U.K.; Imoize, A.L.; Li, C.T.; Simaiya, S.; Pani, S.K.; Goyal, N.; Kumar, A.; Lee, C.C. Design and implementation of an ML and IoT based Adaptive Traffic-management system for smart cities. Sensors 2022, 22, 2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Y.; Huo, L.; Wu, J.; Bashir, A.K. Swarm learning-based dynamic optimal management for traffic congestion in 6G-driven intelligent transportation system. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023, 24, 7831–7846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, H.; Xu, L. Research on the application of big data visualization technology in urban road congestion. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 2022, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Zhang, T.; Hu, W. Intelligent traffic flow prediction and analysis based on internet of things and big data. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 2022, 6420799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Zha, H.; Zhang, S.; Ma, L. Road section traffic flow prediction method based on the traffic factor state network. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2023, 618, 128712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, C.; Chen, C.H.; Hwang, F.J.; Chang, C.C.; Chang, C.C. Fast spatiotemporal learning framework for traffic flow forecasting. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamu, C.; van Nes, A.; Garau, C. Bill Hillier’s Legacy: Space Syntax—A Synopsis of Basic Concepts, Measures, and Empirical Application. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, L.; Wang, T.; Adeyeye, K. A Comparative Study of Urban Spatial Characteristics of the Capitals of Tang and Song Dynasties Based on Space Syntax. Urban Sci. 2021, 5, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, W.; Du, N.; Wang, X. Understanding the City-transport System of Urban Agglomeration through Improved Space Syntax Analysis. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 2022, 45, 161–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, Z.; Pan, L.; Wang, Q.; Chen, P.; Yan, C.; Liu, L. Research on Urban Ecological Network Under the Threat of Road Networks—A Case Study of Wuhan. Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mariusz, L. Space syntax as a socio-economic approach: A review of potentials in the polish context. Misc. Geogr. Reg. Stud. Dev. 2022, 26, 5–14. [Google Scholar]
- Lerman, Y.; Rofe, Y.; Omer, I. Using Space Syntax to Model Pedestrian Movement in Urban Transportation Planning. Geogr. Anal. 2014, 46, 392–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yücekaya, M.; Günaydn, A. An Investigation of Sustainable Transportation Model in Campus Areas with Space Syntax Method. Int. J. Archit. Plan. 2020, 8, 262–281. [Google Scholar]
- Esposito, D.; Santoro, S.; Camarda, D. Agent-Based Analysis of Urban Spaces Using Space Syntax and Spatial Cognition Approaches: A Case Study in Bari, Italy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, B.; Liu, C. Street-based Topological Representations and Analyses for Predicting Traffic Flow in GIS. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2009, 23, 1119–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tao, W.; Zhang, L.; Shen, M.; Huang, M. Study on the Prediction of Urban Road Traffic from the Perspective of Syntax:A Case study on Renmin Viaduct Demolition in GuangZhou. J. South China Norm. Univ. 2017, 49, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Liu, X. Quantitative Analysis of Urban Spatial Morphology Based on GIS Regionalization and Spatial Syntax. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.; Ban, Y. Comparative Analysis on Topological Structures of Urban Street Networks. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Knoop, V.L.; Lint, H.V.; Hoogendoorn, S.P. Traffic dynamics: Its impact on the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2015, 438, 236–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laval, J.A.; Castrillón, F. Stochastic Approximations for the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram of Urban Networks—ScienceDirect. Transp. Res. Procedia 2015, 7, 615–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ulmer, M.W.; Goodson, J.C.; Mattfeld, D.C.; Thomas, B.W. On modeling stochastic dynamic vehicle routing problems. EURO J. Transp. Logist. 2020, 9, 100008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, S.Y.; Chen, S. A study on the Spatial form of Urban Traffic based on Spatial Syntax—A case study of Changsha University City. J. Nat. Sci. Hunan Norm. Univ. 2015, 38, 64–69. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.J.; Xia, C.; Zhang, A.Q. Expansion intensity Index based on Space Syntax and its Application in Urban expansion Analysis. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2016, 71, 1302–1314. [Google Scholar]
Road Name | Road Grade | Evening Peak Traffic Flow (pcu/h) | Saturation | Integration |
---|---|---|---|---|
Huadu Avenue | Expressway | 3952 | 0.76 | 1.0600 |
G106 | Trunk road | 1701 | 0.63 | 0.8628 |
Commercial Avenue | Trunk road | 2052 | 0.76 | 0.9780 |
Xu-Guang highway | Highway | 3672 | 0.51 | 0.9539 |
Ziwei Road | Subsidiary road | 1428 | 0.68 | 1.5434 |
Sandong Avenue | Trunk road | 1872 | 0.52 | 1.1320 |
Gongyi Road | Subsidiary road | 1736 | 0.62 | 1.6200 |
Tiangui Road | Trunk road | 1755 | 0.65 | 1.1840 |
Shuguang Road | Subsidiary road | 1491 | 0.71 | 1.1890 |
Fenghuang Road | Trunk road | 1809 | 0.67 | 1.2740 |
Yingbin Avenue | Trunk road | 2808 | 0.78 | 1.1622 |
North Jianshe Road | Trunk road | 1944 | 0.72 | 1.2349 |
Subzone Number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 53 | 60 | 203 | 122 | 136 | 200 | 153 | 93 |
2 | 53 | 0 | 52 | 60 | 932 | 190 | 60 | 60 | 64 |
3 | 60 | 52 | 0 | 326 | 205 | 136 | 326 | 156 | 205 |
4 | 198 | 60 | 325 | 0 | 300 | 58 | 60 | 869 | 300 |
5 | 86 | 977 | 217 | 311 | 0 | 125 | 311 | 144 | 60 |
6 | 134 | 199 | 134 | 59 | 115 | 0 | 56 | 52 | 188 |
7 | 188 | 60 | 325 | 60 | 300 | 55 | 0 | 60 | 110 |
8 | 149 | 60 | 156 | 886 | 138 | 52 | 60 | 0 | 138 |
9 | 99 | 65 | 217 | 311 | 60 | 164 | 121 | 144 | 0 |
Road Name | Road Grade | Saturation | Integration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 Times | 1.4 Times | 1.6 Times | 1.8 Times | |||
Huadu Avenue | Expressway | 0.802 | 0.810 | 0.873 | 0.959 | 1.0600 |
G106 | Trunk road | 0.789 | 0.803 | 0.893 | 0.947 | 0.8628 |
Commercial Avenue | Trunk road | 0.814 | 0.822 | 0.894 | 0.955 | 0.9780 |
Xu-Guang highway | Highway | 0.747 | 0.812 | 0.833 | 0.854 | 0.9539 |
Ziwei Road | Subsidiary road | 0.872 | 0.910 | 0.911 | 0.918 | 1.5434 |
Sandong Avenue | Trunk road | 0.768 | 0.842 | 0.866 | 0.899 | 1.1320 |
Gongyi Road | Subsidiary road | 0.852 | 0.900 | 0.912 | 0.923 | 1.6200 |
Tiangui Road | Trunk road | 0.808 | 0.835 | 0.847 | 0.877 | 1.1840 |
Shuguang Road | Subsidiary road | 0.811 | 0.833 | 0.868 | 0.874 | 1.1890 |
Fenghuang Road | Trunk road | 0.793 | 0.865 | 0.879 | 0.884 | 1.2740 |
Yingbin Avenue | Trunk road | 0.835 | 0.844 | 0.855 | 0.892 | 1.1622 |
North Jianshe Road | Trunk road | 0.805 | 0.866 | 0.873 | 0.883 | 1.2350 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhou, S.; Zang, X.; Yang, J.; Chen, W.; Li, J.; Chen, S. Modelling the Coupling Relationship between Urban Road Spatial Structure and Traffic Flow. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11142. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411142
Zhou S, Zang X, Yang J, Chen W, Li J, Chen S. Modelling the Coupling Relationship between Urban Road Spatial Structure and Traffic Flow. Sustainability. 2023; 15(14):11142. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411142
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhou, Shaobo, Xiaodong Zang, Junheng Yang, Wanying Chen, Jiahao Li, and Shuyi Chen. 2023. "Modelling the Coupling Relationship between Urban Road Spatial Structure and Traffic Flow" Sustainability 15, no. 14: 11142. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411142
APA StyleZhou, S., Zang, X., Yang, J., Chen, W., Li, J., & Chen, S. (2023). Modelling the Coupling Relationship between Urban Road Spatial Structure and Traffic Flow. Sustainability, 15(14), 11142. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411142