The Role of Citizen Science in Promoting Ocean and Water Literacy in School Communities: The ProBleu Methodology
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Proposed Research
2.1. Funding Calls
- The needs and aims of individual projects.
- The potential to be shared across the educational sector.
- Environmental themes and issues addressed.
- Types of participation involved.
- The innovation potential of the impacts across society.
2.2. Adaptation of Resources
2.3. Development of Tools
2.4. Key Methodological Processes
- Primary school children, secondary school youth, teachers, school administration and the Network of European Blue Schools. Children, youth and teachers are the lifeblood of school projects. Different school actors can be applicants for funding, as the coordinators of student- or school-led initiatives.
- Wider school community, including parents, NGOs and other social partners. The wider school community involvement takes several forms. As well as being a target of extended actions to improve ocean and water literacy, it is engaged as a potential sponsor of events, helping to communicate activities as widely as possible. Social partners are also part of the user-centred design process, helping to ensure that support tools assist environmental education in fully realising its potential to bridge the gap between science and society. Some social partners can further engage participants with learning outside the school environment (e.g., educational activities in aquaria).
- Academia. Not only are academics involved as part of a user-centred design approach, but existing networks (e.g., EU-Citizen.Science, ECS, ECSA, MICS, current and past Science-with-and-for-Society projects) are also used to communicate activities and disseminate outputs and results.
- Policymakers. A key aim of ProBleu-CS is to implement innovative systems to support environmental education. Policymakers are critical in ensuring that future research-and-innovation systems learn from applying ProBleu-CS and that societal impacts from environmental education actions are fully realised.
- Journalists and media, including scientific and educational publications. Journalists are key in widely communicating the funding opportunities related to ProBleu-CS and enhancing the recognition of successful practices through publicising the best school projects.
- Large-scale initiatives and programmes. To ensure sustained growth of the Network, as well as project sustainability, large-scale initiatives and programmes with potential partners for school projects and activities—including, for example, The European Marine Science Educators Association (EMSEA)—are a key target group.
3. Anticipated Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Impact
4.1.1. Scientific Impacts
4.1.2. Economic and Technological Impacts
4.1.3. Societal Impacts
4.2. Scale and Significance
- At least 400 schools, 30,000 students and 1300 educators mobilised to use ProBleu-CS resources.
- At least 300 projects using challenge-based learning, design thinking or science shops.
- Catalogue of new co-created teaching materials, such as courses, websites, multimedia items and text documents, shared by at least 300 creators.
- At least 10% of teaching material and activities accessible to any kind of special need.
- Financing of at least 100 projects.
- At least 300 twinned applications submitted.
- Documentation of the management, reviewing, monitoring, reporting and marketing processes of funding calls publicly available.
4.3. Requirements and Potential Barriers
4.3.1. Neutrality
4.3.2. Equitability and Transparency
4.3.3. Scale
4.3.4. Unfair Advantages
4.3.5. Languages
4.3.6. Functional Diversity
4.3.7. Sustainability
4.3.8. Limitations to the ProBleu-CS Approach
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- European Union. Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). In Official Journal of the European Union; European Union: Maastricht, The Netherlands, 2008; L 164/19–40. [Google Scholar]
- European Union. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (Water Framework Directive). In Official Journal of the European Communities; European Union: Maastricht, The Netherlands, 2000; L 327/1–72. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment; Tsiripidis, I.; Piernik, A.; Janssen, J. European Red List of Habitats Part 2, Terrestrial and Freshwater Habitats; Publications Office of the European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UN-Water. 2021: Summary Progress Update 2021—SDG 6—Water and Sanitation for All; UN-Water: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Andriamahefazafy, M.; Touron-Gardic, G.; March, A.; Hosch, G.; Palomares, M.L.D.; Failler, P. Sustainable development goal 14: To what degree have we achieved the 2020 targets for our oceans? Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2022, 227, 106273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisman, L. The Effects of Local Learning on Environmental Awareness in Children: An Empirical Investigation. J. Environ. Educ. 2005, 36, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hildén, M. The evolution of climate policies—The role of learning and evaluations. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 1798–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wichmann, C.-S.; Fischer, D.; Geiger, S.M.; Honorato-Zimmer, D.; Knickmeier, K.; Kruse, K.; Sundermann, A.; Thiel, M. Promoting pro-environmental behavior through citizen science? A case study with Chilean schoolchildren on marine plastic pollution. Mar. Policy 2022, 141, 105035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, R.; Evans, K.; Evans, K.; Alexander, K.; Bettiol, S.; Corney, S.; Cullen-Knox, C.; Cvitanovic, C.; de Salas, K.; Emad, G.R.; et al. Connecting to the oceans: Supporting ocean literacy and public engagement. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2022, 32, 123–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Union. Network of European Blue Schools. Available online: https://maritime-forum.ec.europa.eu/en/frontpage/1485 (accessed on 22 July 2023).
- European Union. EU4Ocean Coalition. Available online: https://maritime-forum.ec.europa.eu/en/frontpage/1482 (accessed on 22 July 2023).
- Hadjimichael, M. A call for a blue degrowth: Unravelling the European Union’s fisheries and maritime policies. Mar. Policy 2018, 94, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Clark, H.; Coll-Seck, A.M.; Banerjee, A.; Peterson, S.; Dalglish, S.L.; Ameratunga, S.; Balabanova, D.; Bhan, M.K.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Borrazzo, J.; et al. A future for the world’s children? A WHO-UNICEF-Lancet Commission. Lancet 2020, 395, 605–658, Erratum in Lancet 2020, 395, 1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gaskell, A. Open Distance Learning. In Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory; Peters, M.A., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceccaroni, L.; Bowser, A.; Brenton, P. Civic education and citizen science: Definitions, categories, knowledge representation. In Analyzing the Role of Citizen Science in Modern Research; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2017; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- Mominó, J.M.; Piera, J.; Jurado, E. Citizen observatories as advanced learning environments. In Analyzing the Role of Citizen Science in Modern Research; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2017; pp. 192–212. [Google Scholar]
- Available online: https://www.freshwaterwatch.org/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Young, J.C.; Rose, D.C.; Mumby, H.S.; Benitez-Capistros, F.; Derrick, C.J.; Finch, T.; Garcia, C.; Home, C.; Marwaha, E.; Morgans, C.; et al. A methodological guide to using and reporting on interviews in conservation science research. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2018, 9, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wilkinson, M.D.; Dumontier, M.; Aalbersberg, I.J.; Appleton, G.; Axton, M.; Baak, A.; Blomberg, N.; Boiten, J.W.; da Silva Santos, L.B.; Bourne, P.E.; et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 2016, 3, 160018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rasmussen, P. Educational research—public responsibility, private funding? Nord. J. Stud. Educ. Policy 2022, 8, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Copejans, E.; Besançon, M.; Lourenço, C.; Batista, V.; Soares, S.; Noronha, A.; European Commission. A wave of European Blue Schools. In Handbook for Teachers; European Commission, Directorate-General Maritime Affairs and Fisheries: Brussels, Belgium, 2020; 104p. [Google Scholar]
- Su, J.; Yang, W. Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT: A Framework for Applying Generative AI in Education. ECNU Rev. Educ. 2023, 20965311231168423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://oceanliteracy.unesco.org/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Available online: https://eu-citizen.science/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Available online: https://eosc-portal.eu/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Available online: https://www.ecsa.ngo/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Available online: https://citizenscience.org/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Available online: https://citizenscience.org.au/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Pérez-Sánchez, E.O.; Chavarro-Miranda, F.; Riano-Cruz, J.D. Challenge-based learning: A ‘entrepreneurship-oriented’ teaching experience. Manag. Educ. 2023, 37, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foster, M.K. Design Thinking: A Creative Approach to Problem Solving. Manag. Teach. Rev. 2021, 6, 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, L.F.; Smith, R.S.; Smythe, J.T.; Varon, R.K. Challenge-Based Learning: An Approach for Our Time; The New Media Consortium: Austin, TX, USA, 2009; Available online: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182083/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Wu, J.; Atit, K.; Ramey, K.E.; Flanagan-Hall, G.A.; Vondracek, M.; Jona, K.; Uttal, D.H. Investigating Students’ Learning through Co-designing with Technology. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 2021, 30, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wam, H.K.; Goździk, A.; Aspholm, P.E.; Juńczyk, T. Democratizing education: Open schooling engaged the less privileged in environmental sciences. PLoS ONE 2021, 17, e0266655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://www.cost.eu/actions/CA15212/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Paleco, C.; García Peter, S.; Salas Seoane, N.; Kaufmann, J.; Argyri, P. Inclusiveness and Diversity in Citizen Science. In The Science of Citizen Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 261–281. [Google Scholar]
- Available online: https://edu-arctic.eu/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Fraisl, D.; Campbell, J.; See, L.; Wehn, U.; Wardlaw, J.; Gold, M.; Moorthy, I.; Arias, R.; Piera, J.; Oliver, J.L.; et al. Mapping citizen science contributions to the UN sustainable development goals. Sustain. Sci. 2020, 15, 1735–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souder, L. The Ethics of Scholarly Peer Review: A Review of the Literature; Learned Publishing: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; Volume 24, pp. 55–72. [Google Scholar]
- Parrish, J.K.; Jones, T.; Burgess, H.K.; He, Y.; Fortson, L.; Cavalier, D. Hoping for optimality or designing for inclusion: Persistence, learning, and the social network of citizen science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 1894–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pateman, R.M.; Dyke, A.; West, S.E. The Diversity of Participants in Environmental Citizen Science. Citiz. Sci. Theory Pract. 2021, 6, 9, ISSN 2057-4991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phillips, T.B.; Ballard, H., L.; Lewenstein, B.V.; Bonney, R. Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Sci. Educ. 2019, 103, 665–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rotman, D.; Hammock, J.; Preece, J.; Boston, C.L.; Hansen, D.L.; Bowser, A.; He, Y. Does motivation in citizen science change with time and culture? In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, Baltimore, MD, USA, 15–19 February 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Pocock, M.J.O.; Roy, H.E.; August, T.; Kuria, A.; Barasa, F.; Bett, J.; Githiru, M.; Kairo, J.; Kimani, J.; Kinuthia, W.; et al. Developing the Global Potential of Citizen Science: Assessing Opportunities That Benefit People, Society and the Environment in East Africa. J. Appl. Ecol. 2019, 56, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Toomey, A.; Domroese, M. Can citizen science lead to positive conservation attitudes and behaviors? Hum. Ecol. Rev. 2013, 20, 50–62. [Google Scholar]
- Hidalgo, E.S.; Perelló, J.; Becker, F.; Bonhoure, I.; Legris, M.; Cigarini, A. Participation and Co-Creation in Citizen Science; Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, A., Ceccaroni, L., Lemmens, R., Perelló, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R., Wagenknecht, K., Eds.; The Science of Citizen Science, 199; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Expected Outcomes | Expected Results | KPIs |
---|---|---|
ProBleu-CS helps mobilise and engage children, youth, teachers and school communities to implement SDG4, 6 and 14 through innovative environmental education programmes. These programmes increase (1) ocean and water literacy and (2) the understanding of their value. For example, ProBleu-CS helps make the most relevant ocean and freshwater data from biogeochemical models and satellite Earth observation accessible and understandable to the school communities. As a baseline for educators’ engagement, an H2020 project (EDU-ARCTIC) [36] enrolled 1200 teachers in an informal open-schooling course in environmental science. | (OBJ1) Increased mobilisation through engagement in environmental education, directly addressing SDG4, 6 and 14. | KPI#1: At least 400 schools mobilised to use resources KPI#2: At least 30,000 students and 1300 educators using ProBleu-CS resources |
ProBleu-CS helps mobilise and engage children, youth, teachers and school communities to implement SDG4, 6 and 14 through the funding of student and school projects and generating resources such as recommendations, guidance and best-practice materials. The call for student and school projects helps promote SDG6, 4 and 14, and attract new schools to apply for the Network of European Blue Schools membership. The Network’s growth is also supported by twinned applications (by a school from the Network and those aspiring to become accredited members of the Network), employing a perspective of peer-to-peer learning. | (OBJ1) Schools’ engagement in student and school projects, addressing SDG4, 6 and 14. (OBJ3) Growing Network of European Blue Schools. | KPI#3: At least four calls for students’ and school projects’ funding KPI#4: At least 100 projects funded and successfully implemented KPI#5: The Network of European Blue Schools is ten times the size it was at the beginning of the implementation of the ProBleu methodology KPI#6: At least 300 twinned applications submitted |
ProBleu-CS supports schools to implement SDG6, 14 and 4 and mobilise students, teachers and the broader community by offering innovative educational content and teaching/learning methods, such as challenge-based learning, design thinking, science shops and citizen science. For example, schools can link school projects to the evidence used in the international research community, advising on pollution and biodiversity-loss crises. This link allows participants to address school or student project questions such as, ‘Is our lake water level and quality changing?’, ‘How will subsidence in coastal areas affect my town?’, ‘What happens to the plastic pollution in our river–sea system?’ or ‘Are algal blooms becoming more widespread?’. Barriers to data uptake in the classroom are removed by coupling age-relevant data views to clear teaching and learning goals, including input from scientists and educators to suit their specific needs. | (OBJ1) Increased mobilisation through engagement in environmental education, directly addressing SDG6, 14 and 4. (OBJ2) Increased ocean and water literacy among children and youth, teachers and schools. Improved understanding of the value and sense of responsibility towards ocean and waters among the youth and teachers. | KPI#7: Number of students and teachers engaged in environmental education programs KPI#8: Uptake of practical teaching aids by at least 30 schools KPI#9: Teaching aids from the shared catalogue used by educators at least 300 times KPI#10: At least 300 projects using challenge-based learning, design thinking or science shops KPI#11: Assessment of the change in ocean and water literacy in at least 30 schools, by interviews KPI#12: Assessment of the change in ocean and water value perceptions in at least 300 schools, by surveys |
ProBleu-CS helps grow the Network by: (1) engaging schools in activities related to SDG6, 14 and 4 and based on an open-schooling perspective, (2) mobilising a wider community for co-creation and communication of SDG6, 14 and 4, as well as (3) raising awareness about the Network through targeted dissemination and communication actions. Adopting the informal open-schooling methodology developed by the H2020 project EDU-ARCTIC [36] for environmental science, aimed at teachers with teenage pupils, ProBleu-CS helps engage parents, carers, professionals from enterprises and civil society to identify and counter failures to reach the less privileged and to document learning. Finally, to facilitate the engagement in implementing SDG6, 14 and 4, ProBleu-CS will offer the possibility to quantitatively explore complex scientific data, and will generate ready-to-use map figures. | (OBJ4) Mobilisation of the broader community through engagement in environmental education, directly addressing SDG6, 14 and 4. Increased diversity and inclusivity. (OBJ3) Growing Network of European Blue Schools. An open platform, hosting all resources generated in the context of ProBleu-CS. Fully accessible documentation of funding calls, marketing and creative materials, which can be adapted and reused by citizen science projects to support future implementation of the methodology. | KPI#13: At least four calls for students’ and school projects’ funding KPI#14: At least 100 projects funded and successfully implemented KPI#15: The Network of European Blue Schools is ten times the size it was at the beginning of the implementation of the ProBleu methodology KPI#16: At least 300 twinned applications submitted |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ceccaroni, L.; Woods, S.M.; Butkevičienė, E.; Parkinson, S.; Sprinks, J.; Costa, P.; Simis, S.G.H.; Lessin, G.; Liñán, S.; Companys, B.; et al. The Role of Citizen Science in Promoting Ocean and Water Literacy in School Communities: The ProBleu Methodology. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11410. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411410
Ceccaroni L, Woods SM, Butkevičienė E, Parkinson S, Sprinks J, Costa P, Simis SGH, Lessin G, Liñán S, Companys B, et al. The Role of Citizen Science in Promoting Ocean and Water Literacy in School Communities: The ProBleu Methodology. Sustainability. 2023; 15(14):11410. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411410
Chicago/Turabian StyleCeccaroni, Luigi, Sasha M. Woods, Eglė Butkevičienė, Stephen Parkinson, James Sprinks, Pedro Costa, Stefan G. H. Simis, Gennadi Lessin, Sonia Liñán, Berta Companys, and et al. 2023. "The Role of Citizen Science in Promoting Ocean and Water Literacy in School Communities: The ProBleu Methodology" Sustainability 15, no. 14: 11410. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411410
APA StyleCeccaroni, L., Woods, S. M., Butkevičienė, E., Parkinson, S., Sprinks, J., Costa, P., Simis, S. G. H., Lessin, G., Liñán, S., Companys, B., Bonfill, E., & Piera, J. (2023). The Role of Citizen Science in Promoting Ocean and Water Literacy in School Communities: The ProBleu Methodology. Sustainability, 15(14), 11410. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411410