Next Article in Journal
Factors Influencing Housing Satisfaction in Post-Disaster Resettlement: A Case of Nepal
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Runoff Prediction Accuracy in a Mountainous Watershed Using a Remote Sensing-Based Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design of an Optimal Robust Possibilistic Model in the Distribution Chain Network of Agricultural Products with High Perishability under Uncertainty
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Logistics and Operations Modelling and Optimization for Sustainable Supply Chain

by
Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber
1,2,
Alireza Goli
3 and
Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee
4,5,*
1
Faculty of Engineering and Management, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
2
Institute of Applied Mathematics, Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06800, Turkey
3
Department of Industrial Engineering and Future Studies, University of Isfahan, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
4
Department of Industrial Engineering, Istinye University, Istanbul 34396, Turkey
5
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 320315, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(17), 12727; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712727
Submission received: 14 August 2023 / Accepted: 21 August 2023 / Published: 23 August 2023
Optimization plays an important role in several branches of the engineering sciences. Optimization challenges are becoming increasingly complex, especially in supply chain planning; nowadays, traditional methods are not effective enough to solve complex optimization problems [1,2]. New variants of metaheuristic algorithms have recently emerged that primarily aim to combine innovative methods to better search for solutions [3,4]. Many such algorithms have been inspired by nature; the most significant include the Keshtel Algorithm (KA), Red Deer Algorithm (RDA), and Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO). Various optimization problems have also been proposed to find suitable, eligible, optimal solutions for sustainability [5,6,7]. Furthermore, researchers and decision makers have developed and widely employed metaheuristic algorithms for various complex problems. In fact, in the future, almost all aspects of human daily life are expected to be affected by this technology. Experts believe that metaheuristic algorithms will soon be able to find the best possible solution for supply chains.
To address the abovementioned requirements, this Special Issue (SI), entitled “Logistics and Operations Modelling and Optimization for Sustainable Supply Chain”, enables transparent and rapid communication of research highlighting the role of optimization in multidisciplinary areas in mathematical programming. The emphasis is on the impact, depth, and originality of new concepts, methods, and observations with respect to novel methods such as metaheuristic algorithms. This SI seeks to clarify how optimization approaches can be evaluated and implemented in sustainable supply chains. Accordingly, we received 19 manuscripts, where most of the submissions fell into the aforementioned research topics of this SI. Seven manuscripts (including six research studies and one review study) were accepted for publication in Sustainability after providing the requested revisions by the authors, for which the average acceptance rate was approximately 37%.
The published manuscripts thoroughly examined the application of optimization and decision analysis techniques to highlight current progress on novel models and solution algorithms which can contribute to a better understanding of the performance of logistics systems and sustainable supply chain management and provide useful practical insights. The details of contributions are as follows:
  • A two-echelon reverse supply chain system involving a remanufacturer and a collector was studied by Salami et al., wherein the collector receives the used products by paying a reward to consumers. They conducted a numerical analysis to ensure that under a contract, the risk of uncertainty is divided among the members.
  • Babaei et al. developed an algorithm based on an extended Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model to assess omnichannel distribution network configurations. They took into account cost, service, transparency, and environmental criteria and utilized an uncertain optimization model to investigate a case study in the Indian retail industry.
  • A bibliometric systematic review was performed by Zhou and Liu in the field of blockchain-enabled cross-border e-commerce supply chain management. They collected all relevant publications from the Web of Science database from 2013 to 2021 to conduct a network and co-word study by visualizing collaborative relationships with the help of VosViewer (version 2009). They concluded that researchers and industrial managers can promote innovative management practices in cross-border e-commerce supply chains by adopting blockchain.
  • Apparel supply chain management based on reorder decision making was addressed by Baghbadorani et al. using a unified modelling language to delineate the relationship between agents and simulate the supply chain processes. They also applied an enhanced African vulture optimizer, a modified bioinspired approach, and fuzzy inference theory to assist the supply chain agent in the decision-making process.
  • Noruzi et al. proposed a robust bi-objective mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model to concurrently minimize the total cost and environmental impact under an uncertain environment for a multiperiod railway network design problem. The Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) was employed to treat the problem complexity as well as the model bi-objectiveness.
  • A secondary supply chain consisting of a cross-border e-commerce enterprise and a third-party logistics (3PL) enterprise was considered by Ji et al. in order to establish a Stackelberg game model. Given the stochastic fluctuation of exchange rate and demand, a combined decision model was proposed to incorporate the logistics-service level and financial service pledge rate of the 3PL enterprise. It was demonstrated that the optimal logistics-service level and pledge rate grow with an increase in import tariffs and logistics sensitivity coefficients in offshore markets.
  • Daneshvar et al. formulated a distribution network problem of agricultural products with high perishability under uncertainty with the help of a robust possibilistic optimization model. A Genetic Algorithm (GA), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), and Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm (AOA) were implemented to tackle the problem complexity and then assessed through a statistical analysis.

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editors are thankful to all authors and referees for their valuable contributions. The dedicated volunteer work of referees in particular had a remarkable impact on the quality of the accepted papers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Babaei, A., Khedmati, M., Jokar, M. R. A., & Babaee Tirkolaee, E. (2022). Performance evaluation of omni-channel distribution network configurations considering green and transparent criteria under uncertainty. Sustainability, 14(19), 12607.
  • Bahadoran Baghbadorani, S., Johari, S. A., Fakhri, Z., Khaksar Shahmirzadi, E., Navruzbek Shavkatovich, S., & Lee, S. (2022). A New Version of African Vulture Optimizer for Apparel Supply Chain Management Based on Reorder Decision-Making. Sustainability, 15(1), 400.
  • Daneshvar, A., Radfar, R., Ghasemi, P., Bayanati, M., & Pourghader Chobar, A. (2023). Design of an Optimal Robust Possibilistic Model in the Distribution Chain Network of Agricultural Products with High Perishability under Uncertainty. Sustainability, 15(15), 11669.
  • Ji, J., Zheng, H., Qi, J., Ji, M., Kong, L., & Ji, S. (2023). Financial and Logistical Service Strategy of Third-Party Logistics Enterprises in Cross-Border E-Commerce Environment. Sustainability, 15(8), 6874.
  • Noruzi, M., Naderan, A., Zakeri, J. A., & Rahimov, K. (2023). A Robust Optimization Model for Multi-Period Railway Network Design Problem Considering Economic Aspects and Environmental Impact. Sustainability, 15(6), 5022.
  • Salami, M. S., Eslamipirharati, M., Bakhshi, A., Aghsami, A., Jolai, F., & Yazdani, M. (2022). Does a buyback contract coordinate a reverse supply chain facing remanufacturing capacity disruption and returned product quality uncertainty?. Sustainability, 14(23), 15939.
  • Zhou, F., & Liu, Y. (2022). Blockchain-enabled cross-border e-commerce supply chain management: A bibliometric systematic review. Sustainability, 14(23), 15918.

References

  1. Brandenburg, M.; Govindan, K.; Sarkis, J.; Seuring, S. Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2014, 233, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Detwal, P.K.; Agrawal, R.; Samadhiya, A.; Kumar, A.; Garza-Reyes, J.A. Research developments in sustainable supply chain management considering optimization and industry 4.0 techniques: A systematic review. Benchmarking Int. J. 2023. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar]
  3. Eskandarpour, M.; Dejax, P.; Miemczyk, J.; Péton, O. Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review. Omega 2015, 54, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Faramarzi-Oghani, S.; Dolati Neghabadi, P.; Talbi, E.G.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. Meta-heuristics for sustainable supply chain management: A review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2023, 61, 1979–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sheu, J.B.; Chou, Y.H.; Hu, C.C. An integrated logistics operational model for green-supply chain management. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2005, 41, 287–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Seuring, S. A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decis. Support Syst. 2013, 54, 1513–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jahani, H.; Jain, R.; Ivanov, D. Data science and big data analytics: A systematic review of methodologies used in the supply chain and logistics research. Ann. Oper. Res. 2023, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Weber, G.-W.; Goli, A.; Tirkolaee, E.B. Logistics and Operations Modelling and Optimization for Sustainable Supply Chain. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12727. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712727

AMA Style

Weber G-W, Goli A, Tirkolaee EB. Logistics and Operations Modelling and Optimization for Sustainable Supply Chain. Sustainability. 2023; 15(17):12727. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712727

Chicago/Turabian Style

Weber, Gerhard-Wilhelm, Alireza Goli, and Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee. 2023. "Logistics and Operations Modelling and Optimization for Sustainable Supply Chain" Sustainability 15, no. 17: 12727. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712727

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop