Next Article in Journal
Urban Health in Urban Planning—Exploring the Status: A Survey in Greek Local Authorities
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating Farm Tourism Development for Sustainability: A Case Study of Farms in the Peri-Urban Area of Novi Sad (Serbia)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing Students’ Awareness of 4Cs Skills after Mobile-Technology-Supported Inquiry-Based Learning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Perceived Usability Evaluation of Educational Technology Using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ): A Systematic Review

by
Prokopia Vlachogianni
and
Nikolaos Tselios
*
Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education, University of Patras, 26504 Rion, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(17), 12954; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712954
Submission received: 27 June 2023 / Revised: 2 August 2023 / Accepted: 22 August 2023 / Published: 28 August 2023

Abstract

Given that educational technology has increased tremendously, usability testing is a necessity to maximize the efficiency of technological tools in education. The findings of a systematic review including 42 research papers that evaluated the educational technologies’ perceived usability with the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) and the Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ) are presented in this article. The results were categorized according to the following factors: (a) score derived from evaluating usability with PSSUQ/CSUQ, (b) type of educational technology employed, (c) subject studied, (d) educational stage, (e) participant type, (f) age, and (g) participant count in each survey. The usability levels were found to be satisfactory (M = 72.75, SD = 15.12) from the statistical analysis of all surveys (N = 58). The mobile applications category showed a very good mean PSSUQ/CSUQ score (M = 81.53, SD = 12.61) followed by the multimedia category with 73.89 (SD = 19.69) and internet platforms (M = 73.23, SD = 7.74). The educational stage (p = 0.01) and the participant type (p = 0.005) seem to relate to the obtained PSSUQ/CSUQ scores. However, the participants’ age, the subject being studied, or the participant count in each study did not exhibit any significant correlation with the PSSUQ/CSUQ scores. Over the course of time, a marginal non-statistically significant improvement was noted in terms of perceived usability (p = 0.136).
Keywords: usability; Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ); Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ); internet platforms; learning management systems (LMS); mobile applications; educational technology; multimedia usability; Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ); Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ); internet platforms; learning management systems (LMS); mobile applications; educational technology; multimedia

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vlachogianni, P.; Tselios, N. Perceived Usability Evaluation of Educational Technology Using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ): A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12954. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712954

AMA Style

Vlachogianni P, Tselios N. Perceived Usability Evaluation of Educational Technology Using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ): A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2023; 15(17):12954. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712954

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vlachogianni, Prokopia, and Nikolaos Tselios. 2023. "Perceived Usability Evaluation of Educational Technology Using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ): A Systematic Review" Sustainability 15, no. 17: 12954. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712954

APA Style

Vlachogianni, P., & Tselios, N. (2023). Perceived Usability Evaluation of Educational Technology Using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ): A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 15(17), 12954. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712954

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop