Next Article in Journal
Assessing Exergy Efficiency in Computer-Aided Modeled Large-Scale Production of Chitosan Microbeads Modified with Thiourea and Magnetite Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Primary Power Analysis of a Global Electrification Scenario
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Variation in the Ecological Carrying Capacity and Its Driving Factors of the Five Lake Basins in Central Yunnan Plateau, China

Sustainability 2023, 15(19), 14442; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914442
by Hong Zhu 1,2,3, Feng Cheng 1,2,3, Jinliang Wang 1,2,3,*, Yuanmei Jiao 1,2,3, Jingchun Zhou 1,2,3, Jinming Sha 4, Fang Liu 1,2,3 and Lanping Nong 1,2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Reviewer 4:
Sustainability 2023, 15(19), 14442; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914442
Submission received: 19 July 2023 / Revised: 12 September 2023 / Accepted: 28 September 2023 / Published: 3 October 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The author developed a comprehensive index evaluation method to evaluate the ecological carrying 10 capacities of the five lake basins, and analyzed the spatiotemporal variations of ecological carrying capacity and its driving factors. This analysis holds significant implications for balancing socio-economic development with ecological carrying capacity. I have a few minor suggestions regarding the content of the article:

1. Combine Table 2 and Table 4.

2. What is meant by "geo-detector" mentioned in line 432? An introduction is needed.

3. Are the q-values statistically significant?

4. How is the fitting performance of the model? What is the goodness of fit?

5. Is Table 9 incomplete?

6. In line 443, "Ecological elasticity" should be ">0.7"

Minor editing of English language required.

Author Response

Please see the attachment below.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1.The abstract section only contains the research results of the paper and needs to be reorganized。

2.The introduction lacks the research motivation and challenges of the paper。

3. Lines 86-106 should be placed in the 2.1 Study Area.

4.Formulas [3]-[7], Yij, E(Fij) lacks explanation.

5.Lack of analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of selecting research methods in the paper.

6. The 5 Discussion section is only a comparison of research methods and content with previous studies, and should provide relevant suggestions based on the research results of the paper.

7. Lack of innovation and research deficiencies in the conclusions section of the paper.

need improvement

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This study constructed the ecological carrying capacity evaluation index system from three dimentions: ecological function elasticity, resource supply  and environmental capacity, and socio-economic coordination,and analyzed the ecological carrying capacity of five lake basins of the Central Yunnan Plateau. 

Although this paper is valuable, there are still some points for improvement and discussion:

Firstly, the significance of ecological carrying capacity evaluation was elaborated in the paper, but the concept of ecological carrying capacity was not mentioned.

Secondly, the main indicators for socio-economic coordination in this paper include economic density, population density, real GDP per capita, etc. In fact, the socio-economic factors that affect ecological carrying capacity are mainly human activities around the five lake basins, such as tourism activities. Therefore, it is recommended to include human activities factors (e.g. tourism activities) in socio-economic coordination indicators.

 

English language needs further improvement.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

Dear Authors,

The manuscript is very interesting and well-written, but some improvements could be made, such as supporting references in some categories of value, the factors influencing the carrying capacity should be better explained and supported with references. Please read the notes in the manuscript.

Thank you,

Reviewer

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please find the attachment below.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper has been improved according to the review comments. It's good enough to be accepted.

Back to TopTop