Energy Storage Configuration of Distribution Networks Considering Uncertainties of Generalized Demand-Side Resources and Renewable Energies

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper proposed an ESS’s configuration model in distribution networks and obtained the configuration of ESS considering the uncertainty of GDRs and renewable energies. The work is interesting, which can be accepted if the following problems could be solved:

P9, the analysis and discussion on the formula (25) is confused, whether is ”In the right part greater than 0” is “If the right part greater than 0”, “ In the left part less than 0” is “ If the left part less than 0”?

 The English should be improved a lot, like

In introduction, the past tense should better be used for the descriptions of works carried out by the literature.

P1, “In the past years” should be in the past few years

P2, “[11]” should be “Ref.[11]”;

 

Some formats need to be corrected, like

The equations should be right aligned.

The initial letter of calculation in “Figure 4. Flow chart of Calculation” should be lowercase.

Author Response

Dear editor and reviewer, please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comment No. 1: This paper should be edited grammatically.

Comment No. 2: You should add quantitative results in the abstract.

Comment No. 3: You should double check the mathematical formulations.

 

Comment No. 4: The originality of the paper needs to be stated clearly. It is of importance to have sufficient results to justify the novelty of a high-quality journal paper. The Introduction should make a compelling case for why the study is useful along with a clear statement of its novelty or originality by providing relevant information and providing answers to basic questions such as: What is already known in the open literature? What is missing (i.e., research gaps)? What needs to be done, why and how? Clear statements of the novelty of the work should also appear briefly in the Abstract and Conclusions sections.

Comment No. 5: An updated and complete literature review should be conducted and should appear as part of the Introduction, while bearing in mind the work's relevance to this Journal and taking into account the scope and readership of the journal. The results and findings should be compared to and discussed in the context of earlier work in the literature.

Author Response

Dear editor and reviewer, please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Now it can be published.