Halal Healthcare Services: Patients’ Satisfaction and Word of Mouth Lesson from Islamic-Friendly Hospitals
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Underpinning Theory
2.2. Hospital Halal Attributes
2.3. Hospital Intrinsic Value
2.4. Hospital Extrinsic Value
2.5. Satisfaction and WOM
2.6. Mediating Effect of Satisfaction
3. Methodology
3.1. Sample and Data Collection
3.2. Measurement Instrument
3.3. Common Method Bias
3.4. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Demographic Information
4.2. Measurement Model Analysis
4.3. Structural Model Test
4.4. Importance–Performance Matrix Analysis
5. Discussion and Conclusions
5.1. Theoretical and Practical Implications
5.2. Limitations and Direction for Future Study
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rahman, M.K.; Bhuiyan, M.A.; Zailani, S. Healthcare Services: Patient Satisfaction and Loyalty Lessons from Islamic Friendly Hospitals. Patient Prefer. Adherence 2021, 15, 2633–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rahman, M.K.; Zailani, S. The effectiveness and outcomes of the Muslim-friendly medical tourism supply chain. J. Islam. Mark. 2017, 8, 732–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, J.A.; Meltzer, D.; Arora, V.; Chung, G.; Curlin, F.A. Attention to inpatients’ religious and spiritual concerns: Predictors and association with patient satisfaction. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2011, 26, 1265–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zawawi, M.; Othman, K. An overview of Shari’ah compliant healthcare services in Malaysia. Malays. J. Consum. Fam. Econ. 2018, 3, 91–100. [Google Scholar]
- Rahman, M.K.; Zailani, S.; Musa, G. Tapping into the emerging Muslim-friendly medical tourism market: Evidence from Malaysia. J. Islam. Mark. 2017, 8, 514–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prakash, B. Patient satisfaction. J. Cutan. Aesthetic Surg. 2010, 3, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, A.M.; Ali, M.; Qayyum, A.; Begum, A.; Han, H.; Ariza-Montes, A.; Araya-Castillo, L. Exploring the impact of linguistic signals transmission on patients’ health consultation choice: Web mining of online reviews. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, J.; An, B.; Xu, M.; Gan, D.; Pan, T. Internal or External Word-of-Mouth (WOM), Why Do Patients Choose Doctors on Online Medical Services (OMSs) Single Platform in China? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, S.; Muhamad, N.; Sumardi, W.H. Customer-perceived service wellbeing in a transformative framework: Research propositions in the area of health services. Int. Rev. Public Nonprofit Mark. 2022, 19, 219–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobari, N.; Kurniati, A.; Usman, H. The influence of Islamic attributes and religious commitments toward halal wellness services customer satisfaction and loyalty. J. Islam. Mark. 2022, 13, 177–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dabphet, S. Managing Islamic attributes through the satisfaction of Muslim tourists in a non-Muslim country. Int. J. Tour. Cities 2021, 7, 237–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greig, S.; Hekmat, S.; Garcia, A.C. Current practices and priority issues regarding nutritional assessment and patient satisfaction with hospital menus. Can. J. Diet. Pract. Res. 2018, 79, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reznek, M.A.; Larkin, C.M.; Scheulen, J.J.; Harbertson, C.A.; Michael, S.S. Operational factors associated with emergency department patient satisfaction: Analysis of the academy of administrators of emergency medicine/Association of Academic Chairs of emergency medicine national survey. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2021, 28, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hsu, L.C. Investigating effect of service encounter, value, and satisfaction on word of mouth: An outpatient service context. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shahbaz, S.; Hans, R.K.; Mudassar, S. Service quality, word of mouth and trust: Drivers to achieve patient satisfaction. Sci. Res. Essays 2010, 5, 2457–2462. [Google Scholar]
- Zarmani, N.F.; Ramli, M.A.; Salleh SM SS, M.; Daud, M.Z.; Tumiran, M.A. Analysis on the Halal Status of a Medical Device: A Study On The Surgical Suture. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multidisciplinary Approaches in Social Sciences, Islamic and Technology 2020 (ICMASIT 2020), Kota Bharu, Malaysia, 13–14 December 2020; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Alserhan, B.A.; Alserhan, Z.A. Researching Muslim consumers: Do they represent the fourth-billion consumer segment? J. Islam. Mark. 2012, 3, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, S.; Dart, J. Measuring market orientation: A multi--factor, multi--item approach. J. Mark. Manag. 1994, 10, 725–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, M.; Wattis, J. Spirituality in nursing practice. Nurs. Stand. 2015, 29, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Curlin, F.A.; Roach, C.J.; Gorawara-Bhat, R.; Lantos, J.D.; Chin, M.H. How are religion and spirituality related to health? A study of physicians’ perspectives. South. Med. J. 2005, 98, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oliver, R.L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Mark. Res. 1980, 17, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.L. A conceptual model of service quality and service satisfaction: Comparative goals, different concepts. Adv. Serv. Mark. Manag. 1993, 2, 65–85. [Google Scholar]
- Johnston, R. The determinants of service quality: Satisfiers and dissatisfiers. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 1995, 6, 53–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L.L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Mark. 1985, 49, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zailani, S.; Ali, S.M.; Iranmanesh, M.; Moghavvemi, S.; Musa, G. Predicting Muslim medical tourists’ satisfaction with Malaysian Islamic friendly hospitals. Tour. Manag. 2016, 57, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelkader, A.A. Measuring service quality of the Muslim friendly hotels in England and its impact on behavioural intention. Int. J. Cust. Relatsh. Mark. Manag. IJCRMM 2015, 6, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.K.; Zailani, S.; Musa, G. The perceived role of Islamic medical care practice in hospital: The medical doctor’s perspective. J. Islam. Mark. 2018, 9, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.K.; Newaz, M.S.; Hemmati, M.; Mallick, S.Y. Analyzing health-care service environment with Malaysian general practice clinics. Health Educ. 2021, 121, 246–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeaheng, Y.; Al-Ansi, A.; Han, H. Halal-friendly hotels: Impact of halal-friendly attributes on guest purchase behaviors in the Thailand hotel industry. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2019, 36, 729–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, J.S.; Reeve, J. Developmental pathways of preadolescents’ intrinsic and extrinsic values: The role of basic psychological needs satisfaction. Eur. J. Personal. 2021, 35, 151–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carayon, P.; Wetterneck, T.B.; Rivera-Rodriguez, A.J.; Hundt, A.S.; Hoonakker, P.; Holden, R.; Gurses, A.P. Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety. Appl. Ergon. 2014, 45, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rahman, M.K. Medical tourism: Tourists’ perceived services and satisfaction lessons from Malaysian hospitals. Tour. Rev. 2019, 74, 739–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahoo, D.; Ghosh, T. Healthscape role towards customer satisfaction in private healthcare. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 2016, 29, 600–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kang, E.J. Fashion and the aesthetic aspects of social life. Monist 2018, 101, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caricati, L.; La Sala, R.; Marletta, G.; Pelosi, G.; Ampollini, M.; Fabbri, A.; Ricchi, A.; Scardino, M.; Artioli, G.; Mancini, T. Work climate, work values and professional commitment as predictors of job satisfaction in nurses. J. Nurs. Manag. 2014, 22, 984–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dianrui, G. The Effect of Intrinsic Motivation on Nurse Job Satisfaction at Royal Prima Hospital Medan in 2022. South Asian Res. J. Bus. Manag. 2022, 4, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, H.; Yong, H. Effects of Job Satisfaction Interventions in Reinforcing Intrinsic Motivation for Hospital Nurses: A Meta-Analysis. Korean J. Occup. Health Nurs. 2020, 29, 208–218. [Google Scholar]
- Park, G.W.; Kim, Y.; Park, K.; Agarwal, A. Patient-centric quality assessment framework for healthcare services. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2016, 113, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, X.; Ye, Z.; Liu, K.; Wu, N. The effects of live platform exterior design on sustainable impulse buying: Exploring the mechanisms of self-efficacy and psychological ownership. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ramli, A.H. Patient trust on the hospital service delivery system. Bus. Entrep. Rev. 2016, 16, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tan CN, L.; Ojo, A.O.; Cheah, J.H.; Ramayah, T. Measuring the influence of service quality on patient satisfaction in Malaysia. Qual. Manag. J. 2019, 26, 129–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linder-Pelz, S. Social psychological determinants of patient satisfaction: A test of five hypotheses. Soc. Sci. Med. 1982, 16, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ng, S.; Russell-Bennett, R. The role of affect in consumer evaluation of health care services. Health Mark. Q. 2015, 32, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sweeney, J.; Soutar, G.; Mazzarol, T. Factors enhancing word-of-mouth influence: Positive and negative service-related messages. Eur. J. Mark. 2014, 48, 336–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dennis, C.; Newman, A.; Michon, R.; Brakus, J.J.; Wright, L.T. The mediating effects of perception and emotion: Digital signage in mall atmospherics. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2010, 17, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, D.; Yang, X.; Li, X.; Jain, H.K.; Liang, C. Understanding the role of mobile internet-based health services on patient satisfaction and word-of-mouth. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chaniotakis, I.E.; Lymperopoulos, C. Service quality effect on satisfaction and word of mouth in the health care industry. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 2009, 19, 229–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suki, N.M.; Lian JC, C.; Suki, N.M. Do patients’ perceptions exceed their expectations in private healthcare settings? Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 2011, 24, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaur, S.S.; Xu, Y.; Quazi, A.; Nandi, S. Relational impact of service providers’ interaction behavior in healthcare. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 2011, 21, 67–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoque, M.N.; Rahman, M.K.; Said, J.; Begum, F.; Hossain, M.M. What Factors Influence Customer Attitudes and Mindsets towards the Use of Services and Products of Islamic Banks in Bangladesh? Sustainability 2022, 14, 4703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, S.; Muhamad, N.; Leong, V.S. Healthcare quality for Muslims: TCCM and TSR frameworks analyses. J. Islam. Mark. 2021. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eid, R.; El-Gohary, H. Muslim tourist perceived value in the hospitality and tourism industry. J. Travel Res. 2015, 54, 774–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, W.W.; Marcolin, B.L.; Newsted, P.R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf. Syst. Res. 2003, 14, 189–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Demidenko, E. Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited. Stat. Med. 2007, 26, 3385–3397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Iterson, M.; Hoen, P.; Pedotti, P.; Hooiveld, G.; Dunnen, J.D.; van Ommen, G.; Boer, J.; Menezes, R. Relative power and sample size analysis on gene expression profiling data. BMC Genom. 2009, 10, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Falter, M.; Hadwich, K. Customer service well-being: Scale development and validation. Serv. Ind. J. 2020, 40, 181–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kock, N. Common method bias: A full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM. In Partial Least Squares Path Modeling; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 245–257. [Google Scholar]
- Kock, N. Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. Int. J. e-Collab. 2015, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sheridan, J.; Coakes, C.O. SPSS: Analysis without Anguish (Version 18); John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Chin, W.W. How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germny, 2010; pp. 655–690. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dijkstra, T.K.; Henseler, J. Consistent partial least squares path modelling. MIS Q. 2015, 39, 297–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2016, 116, 1865–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Twenge, J.M.; Campbell, S.M.; Hoffman, B.J.; Lance, C.E. Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. J. Manag. 2010, 36, 1117–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wardi, Y.; Abror, A.; Trinanda, O. Halal tourism: Antecedent of tourist’s satisfaction and word of mouth (WOM). Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2018, 23, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Al-Ansi, A.; Olya, H.G.; Kim, W. Exploring halal-friendly destination attributes in South Korea: Perceptions and behaviors of Muslim travelers toward a non-Muslim destination. Tour. Manag. 2019, 71, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciasullo, M.V.; Manna, R.; Cavallone, M.; Palumbo, R. Envisioning the future of health systems: Exploratory insights from European countries. Futures 2020, 121, 102585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbolat, M.; Sezer, C.; Ünal, Ö.; Amarat, M. The mediating role of patient satisfaction in the effect of patient visit experiences on word-of-mouth intention. Health Mark. Q. 2021, 38, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konuk, F.A. The influence of perceived food quality, price fairness, perceived value and satisfaction on customers’ revisit and word-of-mouth intentions towards organic food restaurants. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 50, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.S.; Lin, C.L.; Chang, C.H. The influence of greenwash on green word-of-mouth (green WOM): The mediation effects of green perceived quality and green satisfaction. Qual. Quant. 2014, 48, 2411–2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Characteristics | Frequency | % | Characteristics | Frequency | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Education level | ||||
Male | 195 | 56.1 | SPM/Diploma | 23 | 7.4 |
Female | 114 | 43.9 | Professional certification | 10 | 3.2 |
Residence status | Bachelor’s degree | 207 | 67.0 | ||
Malaysian | 202 | 67.3 | Masters’ degree | 56 | 18.1 |
Others | 107 | 32.7 | Doctorate | 13 | 4.2 |
Age | Occupation | ||||
20–25 years old | 42 | 15.2 | Unemployed/self-employed | 226 | 73.1 |
26–35 years old | 59 | 28.4 | Private employee | 61 | 19.7 |
36–40 years old | 174 | 43.8 | Government employee | 22 | 7.1 |
41–45 years old | 23 | 8.4 | Income level (monthly) | ||
Above 45 | 11 | 4.2 | Below RM 2000 | 141 | 45.6 |
Marital status | RM 2001 to 5000 | 39 | 12.6 | ||
Single | 64 | 20.7 | RM 5001 to 10,000 | 102 | 33.0 |
Married | 235 | 76.1 | Above RM 10,000 | 16 | 5.2 |
Others | 10 | 3.2 | Null/Non Income | 11 | 3.6 |
Choosing hospital | Visiting yearly | ||||
Close to home/residence | 156 | 50.5 | 1–2 times | 83 | 18.9 |
Good reputation | 89 | 28.8 | 3–4 times | 195 | 47.1 |
Insurance panel hospital | 29 | 9.4 | 5–6 times | 19 | 27.1 |
Others | 35 | 11.3 | Above 6 times | 12 | 6.9 |
Reasons for visiting | Health service perception | ||||
Illness | 179 | 57.9 | Poor | 6 | 1.9 |
Beauty/aesthetics | 16 | 5.2 | Fair | 46 | 14.9 |
Pregnancy-related | 10 | 3.2 | Good | 137 | 44.3 |
Medical checkup/counseling | 86 | 27.8 | Very good | 99 | 32.0 |
Others | 18 | 5.8 | Excellent | 21 | 6.8 |
Variables | Mean | SD | SK | KU | CA | rho_A | CR | AVE | VIF | FL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Halal healthcare attributes | 0.826 | 0.832 | 0.884 | 0.656 | 1.905 | |||||
Item_ha1 | 3.73 | 0.978 | −0.352 | −0.335 | 1.773 | 0.822 | ||||
Item_ha2 | 3.59 | 0.958 | −0.224 | −0.411 | 2.052 | 0.836 | ||||
Item_ha3 | 3.46 | 0.975 | −0.212 | −0.319 | 1.773 | 0.779 | ||||
Item_ha4 | 3.51 | 0.899 | 0.541 | −0.657 | 1.709 | 0.802 | ||||
Hospital intrinsic value | 0.877 | 0.882 | 0.907 | 0.621 | 2.575 | |||||
Itme_iv1 | 3.57 | 0.907 | −0.317 | −0.005 | 1.804 | 0.730 | ||||
Item_iv2 | 3.61 | 0.973 | −0.236 | −0.476 | 2.725 | 0.851 | ||||
Item_iv3 | 3.74 | 0.959 | −0.408 | −0.366 | 2.704 | 0.841 | ||||
Item_iv4 | 3.77 | 0.893 | −0.225 | −0.620 | 2.357 | 0.834 | ||||
Item_iv5 | 3.84 | 0.856 | −0.307 | −0.124 | 1.629 | 0.727 | ||||
Item_iv6 | 3.55 | 1.048 | −0.278 | −0.615 | 1.640 | 0.736 | ||||
Hospital extrinsic value | 0.728 | 0.874 | 0.762 | 0.524 | 2.176 | |||||
Item_ev1 | 3.44 | .0922 | −0.085 | −0.316 | 1.274 | 0.650 | ||||
Item_ev2 | 3.78 | 0.888 | −0.337 | −0.206 | 1.352 | 0.771 | ||||
Item_ev3 | 3.76 | 0.944 | −0.615 | 0.235 | - | 0.548 | ||||
Item_ev4 | 3.72 | 0.887 | −0.174 | −0.596 | - | 0.628 | ||||
Item_ev5 | 3.58 | 0.992 | −0.170 | −0.426 | 1.071 | 0.667 | ||||
Satisfaction | 0.841 | 0.842 | 0.894 | 0.678 | - | |||||
Item_hhw1 | 3.77 | 0.867 | −0.213 | −0.388 | 2.242 | 0.854 | ||||
Item_hhw2 | 3.68 | 0.868 | −0.092 | −0.292 | 2.262 | 0.846 | ||||
Item_hhw3 | 3.57 | 0.955 | −0.275 | −0.100 | 1.889 | 0.820 | ||||
Item_hhw4 | 3.89 | 0. 781 | −0.193 | −0.571 | 1.638 | 0.771 | ||||
Word of mouth | 0.715 | 0.791 | 0.796 | 0.504 | 1.000 | |||||
Item_wom1 | 3.95 | 0.784 | −0.133 | −0.892 | 1.415 | 0.784 | ||||
Item_wom2 | 3.78 | 0.861 | −0.180 | −0.266 | 1.534 | 0.873 | ||||
Item_wom3 | 3.61 | 0.946 | −0.225 | −0.245 | 2.189 | 0.567 | ||||
Item_wom4 | 3.81 | 0.922 | −0.288 | −0.688 | 2.161 | 0.563 |
Characteristics | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hospital extrinsic value (1) | |||||
Halal healthcare attributes (2) | 0.555 | ||||
Satisfaction (3) | 0.665 | 0.730 | |||
Hospital intrinsic value (4) | 0.725 | 0.780 | 0.822 | ||
Word of mouth (5) | 0.704 | 0.513 | 0.755 | 0.654 |
Indicators | EV | HA | HHS | IV | WOM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The hospital provides fun activities for the children (ev1) | 0.650 | 0.419 | 0.472 | 0.474 | 0.345 |
Pleasant personnel of the admin staff of hospital (ev2) | 0.771 | 0.495 | 0.512 | 0.584 | 0.443 |
The specialist has sympathy for the patient (ev3) | 0.548 | 0.066 | 0.172 | 0.210 | 0.345 |
Nurse sympathetic towards patient (ev4) | 0.628 | 0.210 | 0.247 | 0.309 | 0.406 |
Full information disclosed (ev5) | 0.667 | 0.217 | 0.339 | 0.358 | 0.451 |
The hospital provides prayer amenities (mats, direction of Qibla, wudhu) in the prayer room (ha1) | 0.436 | 0.822 | 0.569 | 0.626 | 0.401 |
The hospital practices the Islamic greeting “salam” to the Muslim patient (ha2) | 0.372 | 0.836 | 0.470 | 0.524 | 0.355 |
The staff of this hospital practice Bismillah with starting activity and ending with Alhamdulillah (ha3) | 0.324 | 0.779 | 0.441 | 0.476 | 0.326 |
The hospital maintains the barrier of aurat between Muslim women specialists with Muslim women patients (ha4) | 0.475 | 0.802 | 0.492 | 0.540 | 0.407 |
The waiting area of this hospital is comfortable (iv1) | 0.467 | 0.412 | 0.465 | 0.730 | 0.458 |
The clean waiting area of the hospital (iv2) | 0.539 | 0.595 | 0.628 | 0.851 | 0.485 |
The safe waiting area in this hospital (iv3) | 0.506 | 0.560 | 0.538 | 0.841 | 0.467 |
The specialist gives appropriate treatment advice (iv4) | 0.535 | 0.600 | 0.576 | 0.834 | 0.513 |
I receive the warm greeting from the physician in this hospital (iv5) | 0.477 | 0.465 | 0.546 | 0.727 | 0.476 |
I receive the warm greeting from the nurse in this hospital (iv6) | 0.508 | 0.531 | 0.579 | 0.736 | 0.401 |
The hospital serves the welfare of society (hhw1) | 0.469 | 0.532 | 0.854 | 0.584 | 0.560 |
During the physician’s service, I have a feeling of happiness towards the physician’s service (hhw2) | 0.483 | 0.511 | 0.846 | 0.613 | 0.574 |
During the nurse’s service, I have a feeling of happiness (hhw3) | 0.507 | 0.518 | 0.820 | 0.587 | 0.562 |
I trust the hospital service provider (hhw4) | 0.472 | 0.460 | 0.771 | 0.551 | 0.581 |
I intend to continue to receive healthcare services from this hospital (wom1) | 0.421 | 0.390 | 0.571 | 0.458 | 0.784 |
I will recommend this hospital to others (wom2) | 0.488 | 0.438 | 0.683 | 0.582 | 0.873 |
I will spread positive word of mouth about this hospital’s healthcare services (wom3) | 0.471 | 0.202 | 0.272 | 0.289 | 0.567 |
I will recommend my family to visit this hospital that I am already dealing with (wom4) | 0.407 | 0.137 | 0.192 | 0.186 | 0.563 |
Hypothesis Relationship | Beta | SD | t-Value | p-Value | R2 | f2 | Decision |
H1: HA → HHS | 0.225 | 0.052 | 4.281 | 0.000 | 0.046 | Accept | |
H2: IV → HHS | 0.432 | 0.028 | 7.042 | 0.000 | 0.104 | Accept | |
H3: EV → HHS | 0.196 | 0.051 | 3.824 | 0.000 | 0.560 | 0.114 | Accept |
H4: HHS → WOM | 0.692 | 0.028 | 24.095 | 0.000 | 0.478 | 0.916 | Accept |
Mediating effect of satisfaction | |||||||
Relationship | Beta | CI-Min | CI-Max | t-Value | p-Value | Decision | |
H5a: HA → HHS → WM | 0.155 | 0.052 | 0.202 | 4.224 | 0.000 | Accept | |
H5b: IV → HHS → WM | 0.229 | 0.134 | 0.314 | 6.686 | 0.000 | Accept | |
H5c: EV → HHS → WM | 0.136 | 0.065 | 0.152 | 3.671 | 0.000 | Accept |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Rahman, M.K.; Zainol, N.R.; Nawi, N.C.; Patwary, A.K.; Zulkifli, W.F.W.; Haque, M.M. Halal Healthcare Services: Patients’ Satisfaction and Word of Mouth Lesson from Islamic-Friendly Hospitals. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021493
Rahman MK, Zainol NR, Nawi NC, Patwary AK, Zulkifli WFW, Haque MM. Halal Healthcare Services: Patients’ Satisfaction and Word of Mouth Lesson from Islamic-Friendly Hospitals. Sustainability. 2023; 15(2):1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021493
Chicago/Turabian StyleRahman, Muhammad Khalilur, Noor Raihani Zainol, Noorshella Che Nawi, Ataul Karim Patwary, Wan Farha Wan Zulkifli, and Md Mahmudul Haque. 2023. "Halal Healthcare Services: Patients’ Satisfaction and Word of Mouth Lesson from Islamic-Friendly Hospitals" Sustainability 15, no. 2: 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021493
APA StyleRahman, M. K., Zainol, N. R., Nawi, N. C., Patwary, A. K., Zulkifli, W. F. W., & Haque, M. M. (2023). Halal Healthcare Services: Patients’ Satisfaction and Word of Mouth Lesson from Islamic-Friendly Hospitals. Sustainability, 15(2), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021493