Next Article in Journal
Strategic Orientation, Dynamic Capabilities, and Digital Transformation of Commercial Banks: A Fuzzy-Set QCA Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Association between Regional Digitalization and High-Quality Economic Development
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Weak Zones on Resilience of Sustainable Surface Course Mixtures of Fresh-Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CO2 Impact Analysis for Road Embankment Construction: Comparison of Lignin and Lime Soil Stabilization Treatments

1
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy
2
Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(3), 1912; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031912
Submission received: 31 December 2022 / Revised: 13 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Road Construction)

Abstract

The last decade has witnessed increased attention toward products, services, and works with reduced environmental impacts. In the field of road construction, the use of alternative materials, wastes, or by-products obtained from industries is attracting considerable interest. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a powerful project-level tool that allows the assessment of the environmental impacts of a road infrastructure, from raw materials production to end of life phase. In this study, the environmental impacts (in terms of global warming potential-GWP) of an embankment construction project are investigated by a cradle-to-gate approach. The analysis focuses on all the processes involved in the construction of an embankment section, from the base to the preparation of the pavement formation level. The results are provided for two different road types and two different stabilization methods, including the use of lignin and lime. All processes that contribute towards global warming are investigated and described in detail. The most important finding of the LCA, in terms of GWP, is that the production of materials is the phase that contributes the significant share of the total environmental impact (more than 90%) for all scenarios. The lowest production-related emissions can be recorded for the scenarios involving lignin treatment for the stabilization of the embankment body. Furthermore, the percentage increase in GWP ranges between 51% and 39% for transportation activities and 10–11% for construction activities, comparing the scenarios including lime stabilization with the scenarios involving lignin treatment.
Keywords: carbon footprint; soil stabilization; road construction; sustainable construction; waste reuse; life cycle assessment (LCA); alternative materials; environmental impacts; sustainability carbon footprint; soil stabilization; road construction; sustainable construction; waste reuse; life cycle assessment (LCA); alternative materials; environmental impacts; sustainability

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Perri, G.; De Rose, M.; Domitrović, J.; Vaiana, R. CO2 Impact Analysis for Road Embankment Construction: Comparison of Lignin and Lime Soil Stabilization Treatments. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031912

AMA Style

Perri G, De Rose M, Domitrović J, Vaiana R. CO2 Impact Analysis for Road Embankment Construction: Comparison of Lignin and Lime Soil Stabilization Treatments. Sustainability. 2023; 15(3):1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031912

Chicago/Turabian Style

Perri, Giusi, Manuel De Rose, Josipa Domitrović, and Rosolino Vaiana. 2023. "CO2 Impact Analysis for Road Embankment Construction: Comparison of Lignin and Lime Soil Stabilization Treatments" Sustainability 15, no. 3: 1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031912

APA Style

Perri, G., De Rose, M., Domitrović, J., & Vaiana, R. (2023). CO2 Impact Analysis for Road Embankment Construction: Comparison of Lignin and Lime Soil Stabilization Treatments. Sustainability, 15(3), 1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031912

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop