A Study on Temporal and Spatial Differences in Women’s Well-Being in an Ecologically Vulnerable Area in Northwest China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Framework and Methods
2.3. Research Methods and Calculations
2.3.1. Calculation of the WDI
2.3.2. Spatial Imbalance Measurement
2.4. Data Sources
3. Results
3.1. Spatial and Temporal Changes in the Level of Women’s Development in Northwest China
3.1.1. Time Variation
3.1.2. Spatial Variation
3.2. Analysis of the Spatial Imbalance of Women’s Well-Being in Northwest China
3.2.1. Imbalance Analysis of the WDI and CII Based on the Theil Index
3.2.2. Gap Analysis of WDI Based on the Dagum Gini Coefficient
4. Discussion
- Protecting the local environment, modernizing and restructuring the industrial structure, switching the regional development model, and raising the regional development level are the essential steps that need to be taken to increase the well-being of women in Northwest China. By utilizing national strategic initiatives such as the Great Western Development and the Silk Road to jump onto the new era’s wave of fast development, we will cut resource consumption and pollution emissions. We also plan to bring sophisticated science and technology as well as green and energy-saving businesses, and to encourage the growth of regional traditions, distinctive landforms, and a sense of place.
- By implementing a systematic and effective gender budgeting system and other measures, the nation will update the social security funding model, raise social security spending, and create a social security system with the overarching objective of achieving gender equality and ending gender segregation. We will strengthen the protections offered to women in the areas of unemployment insurance, health insurance, maternity insurance, old age insurance, and medical insurance.
- Education is a critical tool for women seeking equality and advancement. A woman’s knowledge of the world and level of professional engagement in social activities are both influenced by their degree of education. In addition to the fundamental requirement that women in Northwest China have equal access to education, it is important to encourage women to pursue higher education and to increase their general awareness through financial aid and increased enrollment quotas. However, women might earn more money in line with their degree of education after completing a higher education.
- When women work in the social sphere, they may convert the labor force that has been primarily focused on the home sphere into economic revenue, which can raise individual income levels and strengthen family relationships. The expansion of women’s employment sectors, the addition of women’s employment positions, the reasonable arrangement of employment training, the optimization of women’s employment structures, the promotion of women’s employment level, and the improvement of women’s employment quality can all be done against the background of the growing proportion of tourism and other tertiary industries in the ecologically vulnerable provinces of Northwest China.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Huang, G.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Nie, M.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Bao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J. Advances in human well-being research: A sustainability science perspective. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 7519–7527. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Q.; Chen, H. The Relationship between Human Well-Being and Carbon Emissions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, A.K. Measurement of social development: An international comparison. Soc. Indic. Res. 2008, 86, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirahmadizadeh, A.; Ghelichi-Ghojogh, M.; Vali, M.; Jokari, K.; Ghaem, H.; Hemmati, A.; Jafari, F.; Dehghani, S.S.; Hassani, A.H.; Jafari, A.; et al. Correlation between human development index and its components with COVID–19 indices: A global level ecologic study. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, C.; Wang, S. Spatio-temporal difference evolution and scenario simulation of multi-dimensional well-being in Poyang Lake area based on system dynamics. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2021, 41, 2954–2967. [Google Scholar]
- Nugroho, T.W.; Hanani, N.; Toiba, H.; Sujarwo, S. Promoting Subjective Well-Being among Rural and Urban Residents in Indonesia: Does Social Capital Matter? Sustainability 2022, 14, 4. [Google Scholar]
- Rahman, M.S.; Andriatmoko, N.D.; Saeri, M.; Subagio, H.; Malik, A.; Triastono, J.; Oelviani, R.; Kilmanun, J.C.; da Silva, H.; Pesireron, M.; et al. Climate Disasters and Subjective Well-Being among Urban and Rural Residents in Indonesia. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6. [Google Scholar]
- Song, M.; Huntsinger, L.; Han, M. How does the Ecological Well-Being of Urban and Rural Residents Change with Rural-Urban Land Conversion? The Case of Hubei, China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Women’s Well-Being Index. Available online: https://calbudgetcenter.org/resources/womens-well-being-index/ (accessed on 12 December 2022).
- Gender Disparity Index. Available online: https://womenandprogress.org/ (accessed on 12 December 2022).
- Belmin, C.; Hoffmann, R.; Elkasabi, M.; Pichler, P. LivWell: A sub-national dataset on the living conditions of women and their well-being for 52 countries. Sci. Data 2022, 9, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Panday, P. Women’s Empowerment and the Well-being of Children in Nepal. J. Dev. Soc. 2020, 36, 129–154. [Google Scholar]
- Roseboom, T.J. Why achieving gender equality is of fundamental importance to improve the health and well-being of future generations: A DOHaD perspective. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2020, 11, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, F.; Bao, L.; Shattuck, R.M.; Borja, J.B.; Gultiano, S. Implications of Changes in Family Structure and Composition for the Psychological Well-Being of Filipino Women in Middle and Later Years. Res. Aging 2017, 39, 275–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strange, J.M. In Full Possession of Her Powers: Researching and Rethinking Menopause in early Twentieth-century England and Scotland. Soc. Hist. Med. 2012, 25, 685–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulte, P.; Vainio, H. Well-being at work—Overview and perspective. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2010, 36, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gilbert-Ouimet, M.; Brisson, C.; Vezina, M. Psychosocial work stressors, high family responsibilities, and psychological distress among women: A 5-year prospective study. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2020, 63, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gur, R.E.; White, L.K.; Waller, R.; Barzilay, R.; Moore, T.M.; Kornfield, S.; Njoroge, W.F.M.; Duncan, A.F.; Chaiyachati, B.H.; Parish-Morris, J.; et al. The Disproportionate Burden of the COVID–19 Pandemic Among Pregnant Black Women. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 293, 113475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padrosa, E.; Vanroelen, C.; Muntaner, C.; Benach, J.; Julia, M. Precarious employment and mental health across European welfare states: A gender perspective. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2022, 95, 1463–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitchforth, J.; Fahy, K.; Ford, T.; Wolpert, M.; Viner, R.M.; Hargreaves, D.S. Mental health and well-being trends among children and young people in the UK, 1995–2014: Analysis of repeated cross-sectional national health surveys. Psychol. Med. 2019, 49, 1275–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Damaske, S.; Bratter, J.L.; Frech, A. Single mother families and employment, race, and poverty in changing economic times. Soc. Sci. Res. 2017, 62, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Trzcinski, E.; Holst, E. Gender Differences in Subjective Well-Being in and out of Management Positions. Soc. Indic. Res. 2012, 107, 449–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Emerson, E.; Hatton, C. Self-reported well-being of women and men with intellectual disabilities in England. Am. J. Ment. Retard. 2008, 113, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Torchio, M.F.; Lucia, U.; Grisolia, G. Economic and Human Features for Energy and Environmental Indicators: A Tool to Assess Countries’ Progress towards Sustainability. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ture, C.; Ture, Y. A model for the sustainability assessment based on the human development index in districts of Megacity Istanbul (Turkey). Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 3623–3637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biggs, R.; Clements, H.S.; Cumming, G.S.; Cundill, G.; de Vos, A.; Hamann, M.; Luvuno, L.; Roux, D.J.; Selomane, O.; Blanchard, R.; et al. Social-ecological change: Insights from the Southern African Program on Ecosystem Change and Society. Ecosyst. People 2022, 18, 447–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, E.; Queiroz, C.; Pereira, H.M.; Vicente, L. Ecosystem services and human well-being: A participatory study in a mountain community in Portugal. Ecol. Soc. 2005, 10, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, L.M.; Case, J.L.; Smith, H.M.; Harwell, L.C.; Summers, J.K. Relating ecoystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a US index. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 28, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Ma, X.; Zhao, X.; Li, W. Spatiotemporal of the Coupling Relationship between Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being in Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yee, S.H. Contributions of Ecosystem Services to Human Well-Being in Puerto Rico. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heywood, I.; Sammut, D.; Bradbury-Jones, C. A qualitative exploration of ‘thrivership’ among women who have experienced domestic violence and abuse: Development of a new model. BMC Womens Health 2019, 19, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell, R.J.; Donath, S.; Davison, S.L.; Davis, S.R. Endogenous androgen levels and well-being: Differences between premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Menopause-J. N. Am. Menopause Soc. 2006, 13, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilgic, G.; Citak Bilgin, N. Relationship Between Fear of Childbirth and Psychological and Spiritual Well-Being in Pregnant Women. J. Relig. Health 2021, 60, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coty, M.-B.; Wallston, K.A. Roles and well-being among healthy women and women with rheumatoid arthritis. J. Adv. Nurs. 2008, 63, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jradi, H.; Abouabbas, O. Well-Being and Associated Factors among Women in the Gender-Segregated Country. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kyrolainen, A.-J.; Gillett, J.; Karabin, M.; Sonnadara, R.; Kuperman, V. Cognitive and social well-being in older adulthood: The CoSoWELL corpus of written life stories. Behav. Res. Methods 2022, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alcaniz, M.; Riera-Prunera, M.-C.; Sole-Auro, A. ”When I Retire, I’ll Move Out of the City”: Mental Well-being of the Elderly in Rural vs. Urban Settings. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ali, S.F.; Semma, B.; Thornhill, C.W.; Castillo, L.G. Eudaimonic Well-Being for Lesbian and Bisexual Women: The Roles of Religion and Social Connectedness. J. Homosex. 2022, 69, 1066–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mir, S.; Naz, F. Spousal Psychological Violence, Coping Strategies and Psychological Well-Being in Married Women. FWU J. Soc. Sci. 2017, 11, 242–253. [Google Scholar]
- Pilar Matud, M.; Lopez-Curbelo, M.; Fortes, D. Gender and Psychological Well-Being. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 19. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, W.H.; Sheffield, J.; Khoo, S.K.; Byrne, G.; Pachana, N.A. Influences on Psychological Well-Being and Ill-Being in Older Women. Aust. Psychol. 2018, 53, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshanloo, M.; Sirgy, M.J.; Park, J. Directionality of the relationship between social well-being and subjective well-being: Evidence from a 20-year longitudinal study. Qual. Life Res. 2018, 27, 2137–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alawiyah, T.; Held, M.L. Social Capital: Promoting Health and Well-Being Among Indonesian Women. Affil.-J. Women Soc. Work 2015, 30, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kettlewell, N.; Lam, J. Retirement, social support and mental well-being: A couple-level analysis. Eur. J. Health Econ. 2022, 23, 511–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, A.; Husain, A. Social Support as A Moderator of Positive Psychological Strengths and Subjective Well-Being. Psychol. Rep. 2010, 106, 534–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, E.; Kim, H.-C. Is she really happy? A dual-path model of narcissistic self-presentation outcomes for female facebook users. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 108, 106328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chapman, B.; Guven, C. Revisiting the Relationship Between Marriage and Wellbeing: Does Marriage Quality Matter? J. Happiness Stud. 2016, 17, 533–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, S.; Raymo, J.M. Marriage and Women’s Health in Japan. J. Marriage Fam. 2016, 78, 780–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, M.; Sarwar, S.; Li, Z. Spatio-Temporal Differentiation Mode and Threshold Effect of Yangtze River Delta Urban Ecological Well-Being Performance Based on Network DEA. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, X.; Tian, Z.; Ding, C.; Liu, C.; Wang, W.; Zhao, R.; Xing, Y. Digital Economy, Environmental Regulation, and Ecological Well-Being Performance: A Provincial Panel Data Analysis from China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verhofstadt, E.; Van Ootegem, L.; Defloor, B.; Bleys, B. Linking individuals’ ecological footprint to their subjective well-being. Ecol. Econ. 2016, 127, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, M.K.; Sok, S.R. Influence of Leisure Activity Participation Between Genders Among Korean Older Adults. J. Gerontol. Nurs. 2018, 44, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furuya, S.; Raymo, J.M. Living arrangements, intergenerational support, and married women’s subjective well-being. Asian Popul. Stud. 2022, 18, 87–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- You, S.; Shin, K. Relationships among exercise beliefs, physical exercise, and subjective well-being: Evidence from Korean middle-aged adults. Health Care Women Int. 2017, 38, 1263–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, D.M.; Nazroo, J.; O’Connor, D.B.; Blake, M.; Pendleton, N. Sexual Health and Well-being Among Older Men and Women in England: Findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2016, 45, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cai, X.; Li, Z.; Liang, Y. Tempo-spatial changes of ecological vulnerability in the arid area based on ordered weighted average model. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 133, 108398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren., B.; Ru, S.; Yao., C. The Blue Book of Western Region of China: Annual Report on Development in Western Region of China; Social Sciences Academic Press: Beijing, China, 2013; p. 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Fang, C.; Xin, F.; Yi, Z. Prevalence of depressive symptoms and correlated factors among pregnant women during their second and third trimesters in northwest rural China: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022, 22. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, J.; You, C.; Yong, J. Integrated water resources management and water users’ associations in the arid region of northwest China: A case study of farmers’ perceptions. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 145, 162–169. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, H.; Tang, Y.; Huo, X. Liushou Women’s Happiness and its Influencing Factors in Rural China. Soc. Indic. Res. 2014, 117, 907–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yingchun, J.; Zhenzhen, Z. China’s Low Fertility Rate from the Perspective of Gender and Development. Soc. Sci. China 2020, 41, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuxia, Y.; Mian, Y.; Bing, X.; Qiaoling, L. The effects of China’s western development strategy implementation on local ecological economic performance. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 202, 925–933. [Google Scholar]
- Xinhua Silk Road Information Service. Available online: https://en.imsilkroad.com/p/312941.html (accessed on 12 December 2022).
- Resource and Environment Science and Data Center. Available online: https://www.resdc.cn/ (accessed on 12 December 2022).
- Yu, M.; Li, Q.; Hayes, M.J.; Svoboda, M.D.; Heim, R.R. Are droughts becoming more frequent or severe in China based on the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index: 1951–2010? Int. J. Climatol. 2014, 34, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- China Statistical Yearbook. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2020/indexch.htm. (accessed on 12 December 2022).
- Lasso, M.C.; Urrutia, A.M. HDPI: A Framework for Pollution-Sensitive Human Development Indicators. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2001, 3, 199–215. [Google Scholar]
- Hsu, C.-C.; Zhang, Y.; Ch, P.; Aqdas, R.; Chupradit, S.; Nawaz, A. A step towards sustainable environment in China: The role of eco-innovation renewable energy and environmental taxes. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 299, 113609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yibin, S.; Suping, Y. The price index system construction of gender equality. Stat. Decis. 2005, 4, 58–60. [Google Scholar]
- Kobus, M. Polarization measurement for ordinal data. J. Econ. Inequal. 2015, 13, 275–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H. In Theil Index Measurement and Analysis of the Household Income Distribution Gap in China. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Symposium on Labor Employment and Income Distribution Studies, Beijing, China, 13–14 November 2010; pp. 199–205. [Google Scholar]
- Kakamu, K. Simulation Studies Comparing Dagum and Singh-Maddala Income Distributions. Comput. Econ. 2016, 48, 593–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Atefoe, E.A.; Kugbey, N. Psychological functioning and well-being among Ghanaian women: A brief report. J. Psychol. Afr. 2018, 28, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chawla, S.; Sharma, R.R. Enhancing Women’s Well-Being: The Role of Psychological Capital and Perceived Gender Equity, with Social Support as a Moderator and Commitment as a Mediator. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, M.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Olsson, G.; Bai, H. Water and related electrical energy use in urban households-Influence of individual attributes in Beijing, China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 130, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, L.; Li, L.; Wu, Y. How does population structure affect pollutant discharge in China? Evidence from an improved STIRPAT model. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 2765–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Zhou, C. What are the impacts of demographic structure on CO2 emissions? A regional analysis in China via heterogeneous panel estimates. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 650, 2021–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Total Land Area (10,000 km2) | Terrain | Hydrological Conditions | Climate Type | Average Annual Precipitation (mm) | Forest Cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shaanxi | 20.56 | Highlands, plains, and mountains | Yellow River, Yangtze River | Temperate, subtropical monsoon climate | 760.50 | 43.06 |
Gansu | 42.58 | Highland | Yellow River, Yangtze River, and Inland rivers | Monsoonal climate, continental climate, highland mountain climate | 450.30 | 11.28 |
Qinghai | 72.12 | Highland | Yangtze River, Yellow River, and The origin of the Lancang River | Highland continental climate | 338.90 | 6.30 |
Ningxia | 6.64 | Highlands, plains, and mountains | Yellow River | Temperate continental climate | 331.60 | 11.89 |
Xinjiang | 166.49 | Basin, mountains | Glacial snow, in-stream, and out-stream rivers | Temperate continental climate | 192.40 | 4.24 |
Total production value (billion yuan) | The proportion of primary industry | The proportion of secondary and tertiary industries | Secondary and tertiary industry employment (10,000 people) | Per capita disposable income (yuan) | ||
Shaanxi | 26181.86 | 8.66% | 91.34% | 1473 | 26226.0 | |
Gansu | 9016.70 | 13.29% | 86.71% | 734 | 20335.1 | |
Qinghai | 3005.9 | 11.12% | 88.88% | 208 | 24037.4 | |
Ningxia | 3920.5 | 8.62% | 91.38% | 261 | 25734.9 | |
Xinjiang | 13797.6 | 14.36% | 85.64% | 896 | 23844.7 | |
Total | 55922.56 | 3572 | ||||
Year-end Population (10,000 persons) | Male population share (%) | Female population share (%) | Urban Population Density (People/km2) | Code | ||
Shaanxi | 3955 | 51.2 | 48.8 | 4985 | SX/S | |
Gansu | 2502 | 50.76 | 49.8 | 3235 | GS/G | |
Qinghai | 592 | 50.3 | 49.7 | 2930 | QH/Q | |
Ningxia | 720 | 50.94 | 49.06 | 3153 | NX/N | |
Xinjiang | 2585 | 48.3 | 51.7 | 3627 | XJ/X | |
Total | 10354 | NC |
Dimensional Layer | Indicator Layer | Weight | Minimum Value | Maximum Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Long and Healthy Life | X1 | Life expectancy for women/year | 0.5 | 20 | 85 |
X2 | Maternal mortality rate 1/100,000 | 0.25 | 0 | 140 | |
X3 | Detection rate of gynecological diseases (%) | 0.25 | 0 | 60 | |
Standard of living | X4 | Employment rate of urban women in other ownership units (%) | 0.15 | 0 | 60 |
X5 | Female unemployment rate (%) | 0.15 | 0 | 30 | |
X6 | Female disposable income per capita/yuan | 0.7 | 352.4 | 264,300 | |
Resource Consumption | X7 | Women’s water consumption (m3/person) | 0 | 2850 | |
X8 | Female per capita built-up area (m2/person) | 0 | 300,000 | ||
X9 | Carbon emissions per woman (tons/person) | 0 | 30 | ||
Pollution Emission | X10 | Female per capita wastewater discharge (tons/person) | 0 | 35 | |
X11 | Solid waste per woman (kg/person) | 0 | 70/30,000 | ||
X12 | Exhaust emissions per woman (m3/person) | 0 | 260,000 | ||
Knowledge | X13 | Average years of education for women/year | 0.5 | 0 | 15 |
X14 | Illiteracy rate of females over 15 years old (%) | 0.25 | 0 | 35 | |
X15 | Percentage of women among college students (%) | 0.25 | 0 | 30 |
Year | SX | GS | QH | NX | XJ | Standard Deviation | Range | NC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 | 0.605 | 0.510 | 0.442 | 0.575 | 0.492 | 0.058 | 0.163 | 0.525 |
2004 | 0.602 | 0.517 | 0.475 | 0.584 | 0.532 | 0.046 | 0.126 | 0.542 |
2005 | 0.607 | 0.492 | 0.474 | 0.507 | 0.530 | 0.046 | 0.133 | 0.522 |
2006 | 0.633 | 0.512 | 0.515 | 0.575 | 0.551 | 0.045 | 0.121 | 0.557 |
2007 | 0.642 | 0.541 | 0.536 | 0.541 | 0.577 | 0.040 | 0.106 | 0.567 |
2008 | 0.665 | 0.570 | 0.551 | 0.568 | 0.594 | 0.040 | 0.114 | 0.589 |
2009 | 0.676 | 0.574 | 0.578 | 0.557 | 0.636 | 0.045 | 0.119 | 0.604 |
2010 | 0.696 | 0.611 | 0.583 | 0.545 | 0.618 | 0.050 | 0.151 | 0.611 |
2011 | 0.709 | 0.606 | 0.598 | 0.603 | 0.639 | 0.042 | 0.111 | 0.631 |
2003–2012 | 0.110 | 0.114 | 0.160 | 0.049 | 0.090 | 0.036 | 0.112 | 0.105 |
2012 | 0.716 | 0.623 | 0.603 | 0.623 | 0.582 | 0.046 | 0.134 | 0.629 |
2013 | 0.734 | 0.645 | 0.607 | 0.655 | 0.596 | 0.049 | 0.138 | 0.648 |
2014 | 0.729 | 0.658 | 0.640 | 0.638 | 0.630 | 0.036 | 0.099 | 0.659 |
2015 | 0.750 | 0.658 | 0.599 | 0.660 | 0.639 | 0.050 | 0.151 | 0.661 |
2016 | 0.759 | 0.679 | 0.578 | 0.670 | 0.659 | 0.058 | 0.181 | 0.669 |
2017 | 0.765 | 0.679 | 0.633 | 0.653 | 0.681 | 0.045 | 0.132 | 0.682 |
2018 | 0.764 | 0.652 | 0.651 | 0.622 | 0.687 | 0.049 | 0.142 | 0.675 |
2019 | 0.771 | 0.664 | 0.650 | 0.592 | 0.688 | 0.058 | 0.179 | 0.673 |
2020 | 0.780 | 0.676 | 0.661 | 0.633 | 0.700 | 0.050 | 0.147 | 0.690 |
2012–2020 | 0.065 | 0.052 | 0.058 | 0.010 | 0.118 | 0.034 | 0.108 | 0.061 |
SX | GS | QH | NX | XJ | Standard Deviation | Range | NC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 | 0.576 | 0.529 | 0.523 | 0.562 | 0.582 | 0.024 | 0.059 | 0.554 |
2004 | 0.582 | 0.536 | 0.527 | 0.573 | 0.588 | 0.025 | 0.061 | 0.561 |
2005 | 0.581 | 0.528 | 0.528 | 0.566 | 0.583 | 0.025 | 0.056 | 0.557 |
2006 | 0.596 | 0.535 | 0.543 | 0.580 | 0.596 | 0.026 | 0.061 | 0.570 |
2007 | 0.610 | 0.552 | 0.556 | 0.597 | 0.613 | 0.026 | 0.061 | 0.585 |
2008 | 0.626 | 0.566 | 0.568 | 0.617 | 0.622 | 0.027 | 0.060 | 0.600 |
2009 | 0.637 | 0.577 | 0.580 | 0.626 | 0.633 | 0.026 | 0.059 | 0.610 |
2010 | 0.660 | 0.604 | 0.595 | 0.642 | 0.649 | 0.026 | 0.065 | 0.630 |
2011 | 0.668 | 0.616 | 0.613 | 0.648 | 0.664 | 0.023 | 0.055 | 0.642 |
2003–2012 | 0.103 | 0.101 | 0.092 | 0.096 | 0.088 | 0.005 | 0.015 | 0.096 |
2012 | 0.679 | 0.630 | 0.614 | 0.658 | 0.670 | 0.024 | 0.065 | 0.650 |
2013 | 0.690 | 0.641 | 0.631 | 0.671 | 0.676 | 0.022 | 0.060 | 0.662 |
2014 | 0.692 | 0.646 | 0.644 | 0.673 | 0.688 | 0.020 | 0.048 | 0.668 |
2015 | 0.711 | 0.654 | 0.633 | 0.685 | 0.693 | 0.028 | 0.078 | 0.675 |
2016 | 0.712 | 0.662 | 0.647 | 0.697 | 0.698 | 0.024 | 0.064 | 0.683 |
2017 | 0.721 | 0.673 | 0.660 | 0.708 | 0.715 | 0.024 | 0.061 | 0.695 |
2018 | 0.728 | 0.673 | 0.670 | 0.703 | 0.717 | 0.023 | 0.058 | 0.698 |
2019 | 0.733 | 0.679 | 0.676 | 0.708 | 0.717 | 0.022 | 0.057 | 0.703 |
2020 | 0.739 | 0.686 | 0.681 | 0.716 | 0.724 | 0.022 | 0.058 | 0.709 |
2012–2020 | 0.060 | 0.057 | 0.066 | 0.058 | 0.054 | 0.004 | 0.012 | 0.059 |
Year | Overall G | (G-S) | (Q-S) | (Q-G) | (N-S) | (N-G) | (N-Q) | (X-S) | (X-G) | (X-Q) | (X-N) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 | 0.0623 | 0.0859 | 0.1555 | 0.0706 | 0.0261 | 0.0599 | 0.1299 | 0.1036 | 0.0179 | 0.0528 | 0.0777 |
2004 | 0.0471 | 0.0754 | 0.1174 | 0.0423 | 0.0152 | 0.0603 | 0.1023 | 0.0611 | 0.0144 | 0.0567 | 0.0459 |
2005 | 0.0466 | 0.1043 | 0.1231 | 0.0190 | 0.0891 | 0.0153 | 0.0344 | 0.0675 | 0.0370 | 0.0560 | 0.0217 |
2006 | 0.0434 | 0.1056 | 0.1030 | 0.0026 | 0.0475 | 0.0583 | 0.0558 | 0.0690 | 0.0368 | 0.0343 | 0.0215 |
2007 | 0.0351 | 0.0853 | 0.0903 | 0.0050 | 0.0854 | 0.0001 | 0.0049 | 0.0529 | 0.0326 | 0.0375 | 0.0326 |
2008 | 0.0345 | 0.0766 | 0.0939 | 0.0174 | 0.0786 | 0.0020 | 0.0154 | 0.0567 | 0.0200 | 0.0374 | 0.0220 |
2009 | 0.0397 | 0.0813 | 0.0781 | 0.0032 | 0.0965 | 0.0154 | 0.0186 | 0.0301 | 0.0513 | 0.0481 | 0.0666 |
2010 | 0.0443 | 0.0657 | 0.0890 | 0.0234 | 0.1218 | 0.0565 | 0.0332 | 0.0594 | 0.0063 | 0.0297 | 0.0628 |
2011 | 0.0328 | 0.0786 | 0.0851 | 0.0066 | 0.0807 | 0.0022 | 0.0044 | 0.0521 | 0.0267 | 0.0332 | 0.0288 |
2012 | 0.0366 | 0.0688 | 0.0854 | 0.0168 | 0.0689 | 0.0001 | 0.0167 | 0.1029 | 0.0344 | 0.0176 | 0.0343 |
2013 | 0.0401 | 0.0645 | 0.0951 | 0.0308 | 0.0568 | 0.0077 | 0.0385 | 0.1037 | 0.0395 | 0.0086 | 0.0471 |
2014 | 0.0264 | 0.0518 | 0.0655 | 0.0137 | 0.0666 | 0.0148 | 0.0011 | 0.0731 | 0.0213 | 0.0076 | 0.0065 |
2015 | 0.0391 | 0.0654 | 0.1119 | 0.0469 | 0.0640 | 0.0014 | 0.0483 | 0.0800 | 0.0147 | 0.0322 | 0.0161 |
2016 | 0.0457 | 0.0550 | 0.1353 | 0.0809 | 0.0623 | 0.0073 | 0.0736 | 0.0704 | 0.0154 | 0.0656 | 0.0081 |
2017 | 0.0341 | 0.0592 | 0.0941 | 0.0351 | 0.0786 | 0.0195 | 0.0156 | 0.0579 | 0.0013 | 0.0364 | 0.0208 |
2018 | 0.0379 | 0.0790 | 0.0796 | 0.0006 | 0.1026 | 0.0239 | 0.0233 | 0.0533 | 0.0258 | 0.0264 | 0.0497 |
2019 | 0.0470 | 0.0745 | 0.0848 | 0.0103 | 0.1314 | 0.0575 | 0.0472 | 0.0570 | 0.0176 | 0.0279 | 0.0750 |
2020 | 0.0386 | 0.0719 | 0.0829 | 0.0111 | 0.1038 | 0.0321 | 0.0210 | 0.0542 | 0.0178 | 0.0289 | 0.0499 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ma, J.; Lei, M.; Yu, H.; Li, R. A Study on Temporal and Spatial Differences in Women’s Well-Being in an Ecologically Vulnerable Area in Northwest China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2324. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032324
Ma J, Lei M, Yu H, Li R. A Study on Temporal and Spatial Differences in Women’s Well-Being in an Ecologically Vulnerable Area in Northwest China. Sustainability. 2023; 15(3):2324. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032324
Chicago/Turabian StyleMa, Jinjing, Min Lei, Huan Yu, and Rui Li. 2023. "A Study on Temporal and Spatial Differences in Women’s Well-Being in an Ecologically Vulnerable Area in Northwest China" Sustainability 15, no. 3: 2324. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032324
APA StyleMa, J., Lei, M., Yu, H., & Li, R. (2023). A Study on Temporal and Spatial Differences in Women’s Well-Being in an Ecologically Vulnerable Area in Northwest China. Sustainability, 15(3), 2324. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032324